Biology:Glyptodont

From HandWiki
(Redirected from Biology:Glyptodontidae)

Glyptodonts are an extinct clade of large, heavily armored armadillos, reaching up to 1.5 metres (4.9 ft) in height, and maximum body masses of around 2 tonnes. They had short, deep skulls, a fused vertebral column, and a large bony carapace made up of hundreds of individual scutes. Some glyptodonts had clubbed tails, similar to ankylosaurid dinosaurs.[1]

The earliest widely recognised fossils of glyptodonts in South America are known from the late Eocene, around 38 million years ago, and they spread to southern North America after the continents became connected around 2.7 million years ago.[2] The best-known genus within the group is Glyptodon.

Glyptodonts were historically considered to constitute the distinct family Glyptodontidae, with their relationships to modern armadillos being contested. In 2016, an analysis of the mitochondrial genome of Doedicurus found that it was, in fact, nested within the modern armadillos as the sister group of a clade consisting of Chlamyphorinae (fairy armadillos) and Tolypeutinae (giant, three-banded and naked-tailed armadillos). For this reason, glyptodonts and all armadillos but Dasypus (long-nosed or naked-tailed armadillos) were relocated to a new family, Chlamyphoridae, and glyptodonts were demoted to the subfamily Glyptodontinae.[2][1] Other authors have continued to use Glyptodontidae.[3][4] Based on the morphology of the inner ear, a close relationship with pampatheres has also been proposed.[5]

Glyptodonts abruptly became extinct approximately 12,000 years ago at the end of the Late Pleistocene, as part of the end-Pleistocene extinction event, along with most other large animals in the Americas. Evidence has been found suggesting that they were hunted by recently arrived Paleoindians, which may have played a role in their extinction.[3]

Evolution

Cladogram of Cingulata based on molecular evidence[2][6][7]
Cingulata
 

Dasypodidae

 
Chlamyphoridae
Euphractinae
 

Euphractus

 
 
 

Zaedyus

 
 
 

Chaetophractus villosus

 
 
 

Chaetophractus nationi

 
 

C. vellerosus

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

†Glyptodontinae (Doedicurus)

 
 
Chlamyphorinae
 

Chlamyphorus

 
 

Calyptophractus

 
 
Tolypeutinae
 

Priodontes

 
 
 

Tolypeutes

 
 

Cabassous

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The earliest remains of glyptodonts are known from the late of Eocene in South America,[1] with more complete remains known from the Oligocene and Early Miocene onwards.[8] Genetic evidence indicates that glyptodonts are nested within the diversity of living armadillos, with their distinctive body armour having evolved from the banded armour found in living armadillos.[1][8] Analysis of inner ear morphology corroborates this position, while also finding that pampatheres are the close relatives of glyptodonts:[5]

Cingulata
 

Dasypodidae

 
 
 

Euphractinae

 
 
 

Chlamyphorinae

 
 

Tolypeutinae

 
 
 

†Pampatheres

 
 

†Glyptodonts

 
 
 
 
 

Cladogram after Casali et al. 2026 based on combined morphological and molecular evidence:[4]

Cingulata
 
 

†Palaeopeltis

 
 

†Peltephilidae 100px

 
 
Paracingulata
Dasypodoidea
 

†Pucatheriidae

 
 

Dasypodidae (long-nosed/nine banded armadillos) 100px

 
 
Chlamyphoroidea
 
 

†Utaetus

 
 

†Parutaetus

 
 
Glytophracta
Euphracta
 

Tolypeutidae (incl. giant and three-banded armadillos) 100px

 
 
 

Chlamyphoridae (fairy armadillos) 100px

 
 

Euphractidae (incl. hairy and six-banded armadillos) 100px

 
 
 
†Glyptodonta
 

†Eocoelophorus

 
 
 

†Pampatheriidae 100px

 
 
 

†Glyptatelidae

 
 
 

†Pachyarmatheriidae 100px

 
 

†Glyptodontidae 100px

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Glyptodonts are divided into two major groups, which split during or prior to the Early Miocene. The first is the traditional Glyptodontinae, which is includes the well known genera of Glyptodon and Glyptotherium, which probably originated in Northern South America, while the second is the unnamed "Austral clade", containing the majority of glyptodont diversity, which as the name suggests probably originated in Southern South America.[9]

Cladogram after Barasoain et al. 2022:[9]

Glyptodonts
Traditional Glyptodontinae
 

Boreostemma

 
 
 

Glyptotherium

 
 

Glyptodon

 
 
 
"Austral clade"
 

Propalaehoplophorus

 
 
 

Eucinepeltus

 
 
 

Cochlops

 
 

Palaehoplophorus

 
 
 

Kelenkura

 
 
 

Eosclerocalyptus

 
 
 
 
 

Plohophorus

 
 

Pseudohoplophorus

 
 
Doedicurinae
 

Doedicurus

 
 

Eleutherocercus

 
 
 
 
 

Neosclerocalyptus

 
Hoplophorini
 

Hoplophorus

 
 
 

Propanochthus

 
 

Panochthus

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

After the Isthmus of Panama formed about three million years ago, the genus Glyptotherium spread north as part of the Great American Interchange, as did pampatheres, armadillos and a number of other types of xenarthrans (e.g., ground sloths).[10]

Description

Doedicurus and Glyptodon by Robert Bruce Horsfall

The largest glyptodonts like Doedicurus reached a height of 1.5 metres (4.9 ft) and 4 metres (13 ft) in length, with a body mass of over two tonnes. The body of glyptodonts was covered in a large immobile carapace made up of hundreds of bony scutes/osteoderms, with the underside of the body and the top of the head also being protected with osteoderms. This protection reached a thickness of 2.5 centimetres (0.98 in). The vertebrae of the back were extensively fused to each other. The limbs were short and robustly built, with the pectoral girdle being wide. The head was short and blunt, with deep jaws. The teeth were grooved, and were evergrowing.[1] The tail was covered in rings composed of osteoderms, which allowed the tail to flex. In many glyptodonts (members of the "Austral clade" other than Propalaehoplophorus and Eucinepeltus), the end of the tail was covered in a completely fused "caudal tube".[9] The end of caudal tubes of at least some glyptodonts are covered in depressions which in life are suggested to have been anchoring points for horny, likely keratinous spikes, allowing for the tail to function as an effective weapon when swung. These "tail clubs" are similar in construction to those of ankylosaurid dinosaurs.[11]

Ecology

Glyptodonts are thought to have been herbivores that fed on low lying vegetation, with mixed feeding or grazing based diets.[12] Some glyptodonts were likely selective feeders, while others were likely bulk feeders.[12][13] Damage to some glyptodont carapaces suggested to be caused by tail club impacts suggests that tail clubs may have been used in combat between glyptodonts, perhaps in sexual contests between males.[14]

Detail of Propalaehoplophorus scutes, early Miocene, in the permanent collection of The Children's Museum of Indianapolis

Extinction

At the end of the Late Pleistocene, all then-living glyptodont species, which belonged to the genera Glyptodon, Hoplophorus, Glyptotherium, Panochthus, Neuryurus, Doedicurus and Neosclerocalyptus, abruptly became extinct around 12,000 years ago as part of the end-Pleistocene extinction event, simultaneously with the vast majority of other large mammals in the Americas. These extinctions followed the first arrival of humans in the Americas, and the importance of human vs climatic factors in these extinctions has been the subject of contention. Several sites across South America are suggested to document hunting of glyptodonts by the recently arrived Paleoindians, which may have played a role in their extinction.[15][3] At the Muaco and Taima-Taima sites in Falcón State in northwestern Venezuela, several skulls of Glyptotherium display distinctive fracture marks on the skull roof that occurred around the time of death, suggested to have been caused by a deliberate percussive blow to a relatively thin part of the skull by a club or stone tool.[3]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Mitchell, Kieren J.; Scanferla, Agustin; Soibelzon, Esteban; Bonini, Ricardo; Ochoa, Javier; Cooper, Alan (July 2016). "Ancient DNA from the extinct South American giant glyptodont Doedicurus sp. (Xenarthra: Glyptodontidae) reveals that glyptodonts evolved from Eocene armadillos" (in en). Molecular Ecology 25 (14): 3499–3508. doi:10.1111/mec.13695. ISSN 0962-1083. PMID 27158910. Bibcode: 2016MolEc..25.3499M. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.13695. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Delsuc, F.; Gibb, G. C.; Kuch, M.; Billet, G.; Hautier, L.; Southon, J.; Rouillard, J.-M.; Fernicola, J. C. et al. (2016-02-22). "The phylogenetic affinities of the extinct glyptodonts". Current Biology 26 (4): R155–R156. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.039. PMID 26906483. Bibcode: 2016CBio...26.R155D. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01879335. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Carlini, Alfredo A.; Carrillo-Briceño, Jorge D.; Jaimes, Arturo; Aguilera, Orangel; Zurita, Alfredo E.; Iriarte, José; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. (December 2022). "Damaged glyptodontid skulls from Late Pleistocene sites of northwestern Venezuela: evidence of hunting by humans?" (in en). Swiss Journal of Palaeontology 141 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/s13358-022-00253-3. ISSN 1664-2376. Bibcode: 2022SwJP..141...11C. 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Casali, Daniel M.; Castro, Mariela C.; Ciancio, Martin R.; Gaudin, Timothy J.; Bramblett, Jeremy L.; Boscaini, Alberto; Perini, Fernando A.; Langer, Max C. (2026-07-01). "Unravelling the phylogeny of armadillos and their kin (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Cingulata) combining morphological, molecular, and stratigraphic data" (in en). Cladistics. doi:10.1111/cla.70048. ISSN 0748-3007. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.70048. 
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Tambusso, P. Sebastián; Varela, Luciano; Góis, Flávio; Moura, Jorge Felipe; Villa, Chiara; Fariña, Richard A. (June 2021). "The inner ear anatomy of glyptodonts and pampatheres (Xenarthra, Cingulata): Functional and phylogenetic implications" (in en). Journal of South American Earth Sciences 108. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103189. Bibcode: 2021JSAES.10803189T. 
  6. ↑ Upham, Nathan S.; Esselstyn, Jacob A.; Jetz, Walter (2019). "Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution and conservation". PLOS Biol 17 (12). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494. PMID 31800571. 
  7. ↑ Gibb, Gillian C.; Condamine, Fabien L.; Kuch, Melanie; Enk, Jacob; Moraes-Barros, Nadia; Superina, Mariella; Poinar, Hendrik N.; Delsuc, Frédéric (2015). "Shotgun Mitogenomics Provides a Reference PhyloGenetic Framework and Timescale for Living Xenarthrans". Molecular Biology and Evolution 33 (3): 621–642. doi:10.1093/molbev/msv250. PMID 26556496. 
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Brambilla, Luciano; Ibarra, Damián A.; Barboza, María C.; Bresso, Edgardo G.; Rosano, Germán; Pérez, Germán; Straccia, Pablo; Scian, Rubén D. et al. (February 2025). "Mitochondrial genome of Neuryurus rudis (Xenarthra, Cingulata); contribution to phylogeny and origin of glyptodonts" (in en). Gene 936. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2024.149059. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378111924009405. 
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Barasoain, Daniel; Zurita, Alfredo E.; Croft, Darin A.; Montalvo, Claudia I.; Contreras, Víctor H.; Miño-Boilini, Ángel R.; Tomassini, Rodrigo L. (June 2022). "A New Glyptodont (Xenarthra: Cingulata) from the Late Miocene of Argentina: New Clues About the Oldest Extra-Patagonian Radiation in Southern South America" (in en). Journal of Mammalian Evolution 29 (2): 263–282. doi:10.1007/s10914-021-09599-w. ISSN 1064-7554. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10914-021-09599-w. 
  10. ↑ Magoulick, Katherine M.; Saupe, Erin E.; Farnsworth, Alexander; Valdes, Paul J.; Marshall, Charles R. (May 2025). "Evaluating migration hypotheses for the extinct Glyptotherium using ecological niche modeling" (in en). Ecography 2025 (5). doi:10.1111/ecog.07499. ISSN 0906-7590. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07499. 
  11. ↑ Blanco, R. Ernesto; Jones, Washington W.; Rinderknecht, Andrés (2009-11-22). "The sweet spot of a biological hammer: the centre of percussion of glyptodont (Mammalia: Xenarthra) tail clubs" (in en). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276 (1675): 3971–3978. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1144. ISSN 0962-8452. PMID 19710060. 
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Saarinen, Juha; Karme, Aleksis (June 2017). "Tooth wear and diets of extant and fossil xenarthrans (Mammalia, Xenarthra) – Applying a new mesowear approach" (in en). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 476: 42–54. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.03.027. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0031018216306630. 
  13. ↑ Vizcaíno, Sergio F.; Cassini, Guillermo H.; Fernicola, Juan C.; Bargo, M. Susana (2011-09-30). "Evaluating Habitats and Feeding Habits Through Ecomorphological Features in Glyptodonts (Mammalia, Xenarthra)". Ameghiniana: 305–319. doi:10.5710/AMGH.v48i3(364). https://www.ameghiniana.org.ar/index.php/ameghiniana/article/view/364/778. 
  14. ↑ Alexander, R. McNeill; Fariña, Richard A.; Vizcaíno, Sergio F. (May 1999). "Tail blow energy and carapace fractures in a large glyptodont (Mammalia, Xenarthra)" (in en). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 126 (1): 41–49. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1999.tb00606.x. https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1999.tb00606.x. 
  15. ↑ Politis, Gustavo G.; Messineo, Pablo G.; Stafford, Thomas W.; Lindsey, Emily L. (March 2019). "Campo Laborde: A Late Pleistocene giant ground sloth kill and butchering site in the Pampas" (in en). Science Advances 5 (3). doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau4546. ISSN 2375-2548. PMID 30854426. Bibcode: 2019SciA....5.4546P. 

Template:Cingulata Genera Wikidata ☰ {{{from}}} entry