Biology:Single-cell multi-omics integration

From HandWiki
Short description: Computational methods in biology


File:MultiOmicIntegrationStrategies.png
Schematic of the different single-cell multi-omic integration strategies. Adapted from Adossa et al., 2021[1]

Single-cell multi-omics integration describes a suite of computational methods used to harmonize information from multiple "omes" to jointly analyze biological phenomena.[2][3][4][5] This approach allows researchers to discover intricate relationships between different chemical-physical modalities by drawing associations across various molecular layers simultaneously. Multi-omics integration approaches can be categorized into four broad categories: Early integration, intermediate integration, late integration methods.[6] Multi-omics integration can enhance experimental robustness by providing independent sources of evidence to address hypotheses, leveraging modality-specific strengths to compensate for another's weaknesses through imputation, and offering cell-type clustering and visualizations that are more aligned with reality[2][3]

Background

The emergence of single-cell sequencing technologies has revolutionized our understanding of cellular heterogeneity, uncovering a nuanced landscape of cell types and their associations with biological processes. Single-cell omics technologies has extended beyond the transcriptome to profile diverse physical-chemical properties at single-cell resolution, including whole genomes/exomes, DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, epitranscriptome (e.g., mRNAs, microRNAs, tRNAs, lncRNAs), proteome, phosphoproteome, metabolome, and more.[4][7][8] In fact, there is an expanding repository of publicly available single-cell datasets, exemplified by growing databases such as the Human Cell Atlas Project (HCA), the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and the ENCODE project.[9][10][11][12][13] With the increasing diversity in both available datasets and data types, multi-omics data integration and multimodal data analysis represent pivotal trajectories for the future of systems biology.

Single-cell multi-omics integration can reveal underappreciated relationships between chemical-physical modalities, broaden our definition of cell states beyond single modality feature profiles, and provide independent evidence during analysis to support testing of biological hypotheses. However, the high dimensionality (features > observations), high degree of stochastic technical and biological variability, and sparsity of single-cell data (low molecule recovery efficiency) make computational integration a challenging problem.[14][15][16][17] Furthermore, different solutions for multi-omics integration are available depending on factors such as whether the data is matched (simultaneous measurements derived from the same cell) or unmatched (measurements derived from different cells), whether cell-type annotations are available, or whether modality feature conversion is available, with different implementations tailored to suit the specific use case.[2] As such, there are multiple approaches to single-cell data integration, each with a distinct use case, and each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages.[2][6][18]

Approaches to multi-omics integration

Early integration

Early integration is a method that concatenates (by binding rows and columns) two or more omics datasets into a single data matrix.[19][20] Some advantages of early integration are that the approach is simple, highly interpretable, and capable of capturing relationships between features from different modalities. Early integration is primarily employed to merge datasets of the same datatype (e.g., integrating two distinct scRNA-seq datasets). This is because integrating datasets from different modalities may lead to a combined feature set with variable feature value ranges. For instance, expression data often spans a wider range compared to accessibility data, which typically ranges between values of 0 and 2.

Early integration approaches produce data matrices with higher dimensionality compared to the original matrix. As such, dimensionality reduction methods such as feature selection and feature extraction are often necessary steps for downstream analysis. Feature selection involves retaining only the important variables from the original omic layers, while feature extraction transforms the original input features into combinations of the original features. The projection of high-dimensional data into a lower-dimensional space reduces noise and simplifies the dataset, resulting in easier data handling.

Intermediate integration

Intermediate integration describes a class of approaches which aim to analyze multiple omic datasets simultaneously without the need for prior data transformation (as this occurs during data integration).[19][20] Several examples of intermediate integration include similarity-based integration, joint dimension reduction, and statistical modelling.

Similarity-based integration

Similarity-based integration aims to identify patterns across multi-omic datasets through the use of spectral clustering (eg. Spectrum[21] and PC-MSC[22]). Spectral clustering cluster cells based on either similarity matrices derived from a multi-omic dataset or graph fusion algorithms (eg. Seurat4) which construct graphs from individual omics layers and merges them into a single graph.[23]

Joint dimension reduction

Joint dimension reduction aims to reduce the complexity of multi-omics data by projecting observations onto a lower dimensional latent space such that the different omics layers can be analyzed together.[24] Canonical correlation analysis (CCA), non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and manifold alignment are popular approaches for joint dimensionality reduction. Tools that use CCA or its derivative sparse CCA, such as Seurat3[25] and bindSC[26] identify linear relationships between datasets by identifying linear combinations of variables that maximize feature correlation. Tools which use NMF (eg. LIGER[27] and coupledNMF[28]) extract low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional data such that both shared and dataset-specific factors across the multiple omics datasets can be identified. Manifold alignment (eg., MATCHER[29] and MAGAN[30]) refers to an approach where low dimension representations of various multi-omic datasets are computed individually and then represented as a common latent space.

Statistical modeling

Various statistical approaches, including the probabilistic Bayesian modeling framework (which allows for the incorporation of prior knowledge and uncertainties into the analysis), can be used to integrate multi-omic datasets. For instance, BREM-SC[31] employ a Bayesian clustering framework to jointly cluster multi-omic datasets, while other tools like clonealign utilizes Bayesian methods to integrate gene expression and copy number profiles for studying cancer clones.

Late integration

Late integration aims to preprocess and model omics modalities separately, and then combine the two models at the end.[19][20] The advantage of late integration is that tailored tools for each omics modality can be applied per modality. While late integration approaches are commonly used in the context of bulk multi-omics studies (eg., Cluster-of-clusters analysis[32] and Kernel Learning Integrative Clustering[33]), late integration approaches to single cell integration is still a novel field. For example, ensemble learning techniques such as ensemble clustering (eg. SAME-clustering,[34] Sc-GPE,[35] EC-PGMGR[36]), have demonstrated potential in aggregating clustering results from different sources. These methods combine the clustering results from different omics datasets to create a consensus clustering which models the relationships between the individual clustering results to find an improved global clustering solution across the different modalities.

As late integration involves analyzing each individual omics layer separately before integrating the results into a consensus result, it may fail to capture interactions and relationships across different omics modalities. As such, some groups argue that late integration represents multiple parallel single-omics analysis conducted on multiple data types, rather than fulfilling the "true goal" of multi-omics integration, which is to discover inter-omics relationships present in multi-omics data.[20]

Single-Cell Multi-Omic Integration Tools
Tool Benchmarked Modalities Supported Integration Strategy
BindSC[26] Transcriptome and chromatin accessibility Intermediate
BREM-SC[31] Transcriptome and proteome Early or Intermediate
CiteFuse[37] Transcriptome and proteome Late
Clonealign[38] Transcriptome and genome Intermediate
CoupledNMF[28] Transcriptome and chromatin accessibility data Intermediate
LIGER[27] Transcriptome, spatial gene expression, methylome, and chromatin accessibility Intermediate
MAGAN[30] Multiplexed immunohistochemistry and transcriptome Intermediate
MMD-MA[39] Transcriptome and methylome Intermediate
MOFA+[40] Transcriptome and chromatin accessibility Early or Intermediate
SCHEMA[41] Transcriptome, chromatin accessibility, and spatial gene expression Intermediate
scMVAE[42] Transcriptome and chromatin accessibility Intermediate
Seurat3[25] Transcriptome and chromatin accessibility Intermediate or Late
Seurat4[43] Transcriptome, chromatin accessibility and proteome Intermediate or Late
Seurat5[44] Transcriptome, proteome, methylome and hashtag oligos Intermediate or Late
Spectrum[21] Transcriptome, miRNA, and proteome Intermediate
TotalVI[45] Transcriptome and proteome Intermediate
UniCom[46] Transcriptome and methylome Intermediate

Considerations for multi-omics data integration

Noise

As single-cell data is prone to noise from both biological and technical sources, developing robust de-noising methods to mitigate noise may be necessary.[47] In the context of single-cell experiments, biological variation arising from factors such as transcriptional bursts, differences in cell cycle, and cell microenvironment can introduce noise to the dataset. Additionally, technical variability resulting from factors like poor sequence quality, uneven sequence coverage, and sample contamination must also be addressed.

Dataset compatibility

Integrating different omic modalities can be challenging due to differences in the structure of different datasets.[48] For example, scRNA-seq features are expressed on a continuous scale whereas chromatin accessibility data (ie. scATAC-seq) exists between 0-2 (two copies of each region per cell). As such, integration of different modalities may require additional steps to transform the datasets into a common latent space. Even then, integration strategies such as early integration may still be prone to issues of bias if the resulting matrix is disproportionately represented by features from one specific modality.

Dimensionality

Main article: High-dimensional statistics

Analyzing large-scale single-cell multi-omics datasets can be computationally intensive because of the high dimensionality of the datasets.[1][2] Hence, the tools employed for integrating datasets must be computationally efficient, or computational methods should be utilized initially to reduce the dimensionality of the datasets (refer to dimensionality reduction).

Interpretability and validation

Many integration methods focus on statistical associations rather than detailed causal modeling. As such, interpreting and validating the results can be particularly challenging, especially if a neural network was utilized, as these methods are black boxes.[20] The utility and validation of integration methods need to be assessed based on practical applications, such as accurately identifying biologically relevant multi-omic relationships.

Matched and unmatched data

The integration of single-cell multi-omic data presents different challenges depending on whether the datasets are matched or unmatched.[48] Matched datasets refer to multiple omic layers that are measured from the same individual cell whereas unmatched data refer to dataset that are measured from a different set of cells. While matched datasets enable direct comparisons between the different omics layers within the same cell, they may not be as readily available as unmatched datasets. On the other hand, while unmatched datasets allow for the integration of different sources and conditions, they require considerations of potential biases and confounding factors. (e.g., differences in cell populations, experimental conditions, or sample preparation methods between different datasets). Several approaches to multi-omics integration for unmatched data include matching by cell group (requires cell type annotations), matching by shared features, or statistical approaches such as NMF.[2]

Applications and uses

While single-modality datasets have proven to be a mainstay in systems biology, combining biological information across multiple modalities has the potential to address biological questions that cannot be inferred by a single data type alone.

Modelling biological networks

For example, the integration of transcriptome and DNA accessibility has enabled the development of bioinformatic tools to infer cell-type-specific gene regulatory networks.[49][50][51] This is achieved by leveraging transcription factor and target gene expression along with cis-regulatory information to impute relevant transcription factors and their regulatory partners.

Expanding definitions of cell state

Another application for multi omics integration is in expanding definitions of cell states incorporating features observed across multiple modalities. For instance, integrating protein marker detection with transcriptome profiling using a multi-omics sequencing technology such as CITE-seq can resolve cell state signatures based on joint gene regulatory and surface marker expression.[52] This enables more robust inferences regarding cellular phenotypes, which are akin to and directly comparable with results from classical flow cytometry. Moreover, defining cell states based on clustering analysis within an integrated latent space may offer more stable estimations of cellular phenotypes compared to analysis within a single-modality latent space.[2]

Imputation

Furthermore, multi omics integration can overcome modality-specific limitations through imputation. For example, most spatial transcriptomic sequencing technologies suffer from limited spatial resolution (pixels comprising a mixture of local cells) and low feature complexity.[53] Integration of spatial transcriptomics with scRNAseq can help overcome these limitations by supporting the spatial deconvolution of low-resolution readouts and estimating the frequencies of each cell type[54][55]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Adossa, Nigatu; Khan, Sofia; Rytkönen, Kalle T.; Elo, Laura L. (2021). "Computational strategies for single-cell multi-omics integration". Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19: 2588–2596. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.060. ISSN 2001-0370. PMID 34025945. PMC 8114078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.060. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Miao, Zhen; Humphreys, Benjamin D; McMahon, Andrew P; Kim, Junhyong (2021). "Multi-omics integration in the age of million single-cell data". Nat Rev Nephrol 17 (11): 710–724. doi:10.1038/s41581-021-00463-x. PMID 34417589. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Subramanian, Indhupriya (2020). "Multi-omics Data Integration, Interpretation, and Its Application". Bioinform Biol Insights 14. doi:10.1177/1177932219899051. PMID 32076369. 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Stuart, Tim; Sajita, Rahul (2019). "Integrative single-cell analysis". Nat Rev Genet 20 (5): 257–272. doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0093-7. PMID 30696980. 
  5. ↑ Li, Yunjin; Ma, Lu; Wu, Duojiao; Chen, Geng (2021). "Advances in bulk and single-cell multi-omics approaches for systems biology and precision medicine". Brief Bioinform 22 (5). doi:10.1093/bib/bbab024. PMID 33778867. 
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 Adossa, Nigatu; Khan, Sofia; Rytkönen, Kalle T; Elo, Laura L (2021). "Computational strategies for single-cell multi-omics integration". Comput Struct Biotechnol J 19: 2588–2596. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.060. PMID 34025945. 
  7. ↑ Baysoy, Alev; Bai, Zhiliang; Satija, Rahul; Fan, Rong (2024). "The technological landscape and applications of single-cell multi-omics". Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 24 (10): 695–713. doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00615-w. PMID 37280296. 
  8. ↑ Macaulay, Iain C; Ponting, Chris P; Voet, Thierry (2017). "Single-Cell Multiomics: Multiple Measurements from Single Cells". Trends Genet 33 (2): 155–168. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2016.12.003. PMID 28089370. 
  9. ↑ Regev, Aviv; Teichmann, Sarah A; Lander, Eric S; Amit, Ido; Benoist, Christophe; Birney, Ewan; Bodenmiller, Bernd; Campbell, Peter et al. (2017). "The Human Cell Atlas". eLife 6. doi:10.7554/eLife.27041. PMID 29206104. 
  10. ↑ Lindeboom, Rik G.H; Regev, Aviv; Teichmann, Sarah A (2021). "Towards a Human Cell Atlas: Taking Notes from the Past". Trends Genet 37 (7): 625–630. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.03.007. PMID 33879355. 
  11. ↑ Weinstein, John N; Collisson, Eric A; Mills, Gordon B; Shaw, Kenna R Mills; Ozenberger, Brad A; Ellrott, Kyle; Shmulevich, Ilya; Sander, Chris et al. (2013). "The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project". Nat Genet 45 (10): 1113–1120. doi:10.1038/ng.2764. PMID 24071849. 
  12. ↑ The ENCODE Project Consortium (2012). "An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome". Nature 489 (7414): 57–74. doi:10.1038/nature11247. PMID 22955616. Bibcode: 2012Natur.489...57T. 
  13. ↑ The ENCODE Project Consortium (2020). "Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes". Nature 583 (7818): 699–710. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2493-4. PMID 32728249. Bibcode: 2020Natur.583..699E. 
  14. ↑ Lähnemann, David; Köster, Johannes; Szczurek, Ewa; McCarthy, Davis J; Hicks, Stephanie C; Robinson, Mark D; Vallejos, Catalina A; Campbell, Kieran R et al. (2020). "Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science". Genome Biol 21 (1): 31. doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1926-6. PMID 32033589. 
  15. ↑ Santiago-Rodriguez, Tasha M; Hollister, Emily B (2021). "Multi 'omic data integration: A review of concepts, considerations, and approaches". Semin Perinatol 45 (6). doi:10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151456. PMID 34256961. 
  16. ↑ Yuan, Guo-Cheng; Cai, Long; Elowitz, Michael; Enver, Tariq; Fan, Guoping; Guo, Guoji; Irizarry, Rafael; Kharchenko, Peter et al. (2017). "Challenges and emerging directions in single-cell analysis". Genome Biol 18 (1): 84. doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1218-y. PMID 28482897. 
  17. ↑ Argelaguet, RICARD; Cuomo, Anna S. E; Stegle, Oliver; Marioni, John C (2021). "Computational principles and challenges in single-cell data integration". Nat Biotechnol 39 (10): 1202–1215. doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00895-7. PMID 33941931. 
  18. ↑ Wu, Yan; Zhang, Kun (2020). "Tools for the analysis of high-dimensional single-cell RNA sequencing data". Nat Rev Nephrol 16 (7): 408–421. doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0262-0. PMID 32221477. 
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Adossa, Nigatu; Khan, Sofia; Rytkönen, Kalle T.; Elo, Laura L. (2021). "Computational strategies for single-cell multi-omics integration" (in en). Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19: 2588–2596. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.060. PMID 34025945. 
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 Picard, Milan; Scott-Boyer, Marie-Pier; Bodein, Antoine; Périn, Olivier; Droit, Arnaud (2021). "Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis". Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19: 3735–3746. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.030. ISSN 2001-0370. PMID 34285775. PMC 8258788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.030. 
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 John, Christopher R; Watson, David; Barnes, Michael R; Pitzalis, Costantino; Lewis, Myles J (2019-09-10). "Spectrum: fast density-aware spectral clustering for single and multi-omic data". Bioinformatics 36 (4): 1159–1166. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz704. ISSN 1367-4803. PMID 31501851. PMC 7703791. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz704. 
  22. ↑ Kumar, Abhishek; Rai, Piyush; Daume, Hal (2011). "Co-regularized Multi-view Spectral Clustering". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Inc.) 24. https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2011/hash/31839b036f63806cba3f47b93af8ccb5-Abstract.html. 
  23. ↑ Wang, Bo; Mezlini, Aziz M; Demir, Feyyaz; Fiume, Marc; Tu, Zhuowen; Brudno, Michael; Haibe-Kains, Benjamin; Goldenberg, Anna (March 2014). "Similarity network fusion for aggregating data types on a genomic scale" (in en). Nature Methods 11 (3): 333–337. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2810. ISSN 1548-7091. PMID 24464287. https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.2810. 
  24. ↑ Cantini, Laura; Zakeri, Pooya; Hernandez, Celine; Naldi, Aurelien; Thieffry, Denis; Remy, Elisabeth; Baudot, Anaïs (2021-01-05). "Benchmarking joint multi-omics dimensionality reduction approaches for the study of cancer" (in en). Nature Communications 12 (1): 124. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20430-7. ISSN 2041-1723. PMID 33402734. Bibcode: 2021NatCo..12..124C. 
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 Stuart, Tim; Butler, Andrew; Hoffman, Paul; Hafemeister, Christoph; Papalexi, Efthymia; Mauck, William M.; Hao, Yuhan; Stoeckius, Marlon et al. (June 2019). "Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data". Cell 177 (7): 1888–1902.e21. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031. ISSN 0092-8674. PMID 31178118. PMC 6687398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031. 
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 Dou, Jinzhuang; Liang, Shaoheng; Mohanty, Vakul; Miao, Qi; Huang, Yuefan; Liang, Qingnan; Cheng, Xuesen; Kim, Sangbae et al. (2022-05-09). "Bi-order multimodal integration of single-cell data". Genome Biology 23 (1): 112. doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02679-x. ISSN 1474-760X. PMID 35534898. 
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 Welch, Joshua D.; Kozareva, Velina; Ferreira, Ashley; Vanderburg, Charles; Martin, Carly; Macosko, Evan Z. (June 2019). "Single-Cell Multi-omic Integration Compares and Contrasts Features of Brain Cell Identity". Cell 177 (7): 1873–1887.e17. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.006. ISSN 0092-8674. PMID 31178122. PMC 6716797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.006. 
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Duren, Zhana; Chen, Xi; Zamanighomi, Mahdi; Zeng, Wanwen; Satpathy, Ansuman T.; Chang, Howard Y.; Wang, Yong; Wong, Wing Hung (2018-07-24). "Integrative analysis of single-cell genomics data by coupled nonnegative matrix factorizations" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (30): 7723–7728. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805681115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 29987051. Bibcode: 2018PNAS..115.7723D. 
  29. ↑ Welch, Joshua D.; Hartemink, Alexander J.; Prins, Jan F. (2017-07-24). "MATCHER: manifold alignment reveals correspondence between single cell transcriptome and epigenome dynamics". Genome Biology 18 (1): 138. doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1269-0. ISSN 1474-760X. PMID 28738873. 
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 Amodio, Matthew; Krishnaswamy, Smita (2018-02-09), MAGAN: Aligning Biological Manifolds 
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 Wang, Xinjun; Sun, Zhe; Zhang, Yanfu; Xu, Zhongli; Xin, Hongyi; Huang, Heng; Duerr, Richard H; Chen, Kong et al. (2020-05-07). "BREM-SC: a bayesian random effects mixture model for joint clustering single cell multi-omics data". Nucleic Acids Research 48 (11): 5814–5824. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa314. ISSN 0305-1048. PMID 32379315. PMC 7293045. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa314. 
  32. ↑ OSBREAC; Aure, Miriam Ragle; Vitelli, Valeria; Jernström, Sandra; Kumar, Surendra; Krohn, Marit; Due, Eldri U.; Haukaas, Tonje Husby et al. (December 2017). "Integrative clustering reveals a novel split in the luminal A subtype of breast cancer with impact on outcome" (in en). Breast Cancer Research 19 (1): 44. doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0812-y. ISSN 1465-542X. PMID 28356166. 
  33. ↑ Cabassi, Alessandra; Kirk, Paul D (27 June 2020). "Multiple kernel learning for integrative consensus clustering of omic datasets". Bioinformatics 36 (18): 4789–4796. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa593. PMID 32592464. PMC 7750932. https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/36/18/4789/5864023. Retrieved 2024-02-22. 
  34. ↑ Huh, Ruth; Yang, Yuchen; Jiang, Yuchao; Shen, Yin; Li, Yun (2020). "SAME-clustering: Single-cell Aggregated Clustering via Mixture Model Ensemble". Nucleic Acids Research 48 (1): 86–95. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz959. PMID 31777938. PMC 6943136. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/48/1/86/5644992. Retrieved 2024-02-22. 
  35. ↑ Zhu, Xiaoshu; Li, Jian; Li, Hong-Dong; Xie, Miao; Wang, Jianxin (2020-12-15). "Sc-GPE: A Graph Partitioning-Based Cluster Ensemble Method for Single-Cell". Frontiers in Genetics 11. doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.604790. ISSN 1664-8021. PMID 33384718. 
  36. ↑ Zhu, Yuan; Zhang, De-Xin; Zhang, Xiao-Fei; Yi, Ming; Ou-Yang, Le; Wu, Mengyun (2020). "EC-PGMGR: Ensemble Clustering Based on Probability Graphical Model With Graph Regularization for Single-Cell RNA-seq Data". Frontiers in Genetics 11. doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.572242. ISSN 1664-8021. PMID 33329710. 
  37. ↑ Kim, Hani Jieun; Lin, Yingxin; Geddes, Thomas A.; Yang, Jean Yee Hwa; Yang, Pengyi (2020). "CiteFuse enables multi-modal analysis of CITE-seq data". Bioinformatics 36 (14): 4137–4143. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa282. PMID 32353146. https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/36/14/4137/5827474. Retrieved 2024-02-22. 
  38. ↑ Campbell, Kieran R.; Steif, Adi; Laks, Emma; Zahn, Hans; Lai, Daniel; McPherson, Andrew; Farahani, Hossein; Kabeer, Farhia et al. (2019-03-12). "clonealign: statistical integration of independent single-cell RNA and DNA sequencing data from human cancers". Genome Biology 20 (1): 54. doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1645-z. ISSN 1474-760X. PMID 30866997. 
  39. ↑ Liu, Jie; Huang, Yuanhao; Singh, Ritambhara; Vert, Jean-Philippe; Noble, William Stafford (2019) (in en). Jointly Embedding Multiple Single-Cell Omics Measurements. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs). 143. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. pp. 13 pages, 3000894 bytes. doi:10.4230/LIPICS.WABI.2019.10. ISBN 978-3-95977-123-8. 
  40. ↑ Argelaguet, Ricard; Arnol, Damien; Bredikhin, Danila; Deloro, Yonatan; Velten, Britta; Marioni, John C.; Stegle, Oliver (2020-05-11). "MOFA+: a statistical framework for comprehensive integration of multi-modal single-cell data". Genome Biology 21 (1): 111. doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02015-1. ISSN 1474-760X. PMID 32393329. 
  41. ↑ Singh, Rohit; Hie, Brian L.; Narayan, Ashwin; Berger, Bonnie (2021-05-03). "Schema: metric learning enables interpretable synthesis of heterogeneous single-cell modalities". Genome Biology 22 (1): 131. doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02313-2. ISSN 1474-760X. PMID 33941239. 
  42. ↑ Zuo, Chunman; Chen, Luonan (2020-11-17). "Deep-joint-learning analysis model of single cell transcriptome and open chromatin accessibility data". Briefings in Bioinformatics 22 (4). doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa287. ISSN 1467-5463. PMID 33200787. PMC 8293818. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa287. 
  43. ↑ Hao, Yuhan; Hao, Stephanie; Andersen-Nissen, Erica; Mauck, William M.; Zheng, Shiwei; Butler, Andrew; Lee, Maddie J.; Wilk, Aaron J. et al. (June 2021). "Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data". Cell 184 (13): 3573–3587.e29. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048. ISSN 0092-8674. PMID 34062119. PMC 8238499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048. 
  44. ↑ Hao, Yuhan; Stuart, Tim; Kowalski, Madeline H.; Choudhary, Saket; Hoffman, Paul; Hartman, Austin; Srivastava, Avi; Molla, Gesmira et al. (February 2024). "Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis" (in en). Nature Biotechnology 42 (2): 293–304. doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y. ISSN 1546-1696. PMID 37231261. 
  45. ↑ Gayoso, Adam; Steier, Zoë; Lopez, Romain; Regier, Jeffrey; Nazor, Kristopher L.; Streets, Aaron; Yosef, Nir (March 2021). "Joint probabilistic modeling of single-cell multi-omic data with totalVI" (in en). Nature Methods 18 (3): 272–282. doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01050-x. ISSN 1548-7105. PMID 33589839. 
  46. ↑ Cao, Kai; Bai, Xiangqi; Hong, Yiguang; Wan, Lin (2020-07-01). "Unsupervised topological alignment for single-cell multi-omics integration". Bioinformatics 36 (Supplement_1): i48–i56. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa443. ISSN 1367-4803. PMID 32657382. PMC 7355262. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa443. 
  47. ↑ Janssen, Philipp; Kliesmete, Zane; Vieth, Beate; Adiconis, Xian; Simmons, Sean; Marshall, Jamie; McCabe, Cristin; Heyn, Holger et al. (2023-06-19). "The effect of background noise and its removal on the analysis of single-cell expression data". Genome Biology 24 (1): 140. doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02978-x. ISSN 1474-760X. PMID 37337297. 
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 Argelaguet, Ricard; Cuomo, Anna S. E.; Stegle, Oliver; Marioni, John C. (October 2021). "Computational principles and challenges in single-cell data integration" (in en). Nature Biotechnology 39 (10): 1202–1215. doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00895-7. ISSN 1546-1696. PMID 33941931. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-021-00895-7. 
  49. ↑ Kim, Daniel; Tran, Andy; Kim, Hani Jieun; Lin, Yingxin; Yang, Jean Yee Hwa; Yang, Pengyi (2023). "Gene regulatory network reconstruction: harnessing the power of single-cell multi-omic data". npj Syst Biol Appl 9 (1): 51. doi:10.1038/s41540-023-00312-6. PMID 37857632. 
  50. ↑ Bravo González-Blas, Carmen; De Winter, Seppe; Hulselmans, Gert; Hecker, Nikolai; Matetovici, Irina; Christiaens, Valerie; Poovathingal, Suresh; Wouters, Jasper et al. (2023). "SCENIC+: single-cell multiomic inference of enhancers and gene regulatory networks". Nat Methods 20 (9): 1355–1367. doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01938-4. PMID 37443338. 
  51. ↑ Fleck, Jonas Simon; Jansen, Sophie Martina Johanna; Whollny, Damian; Zenk, Fides; Seimiya, Makiko; Jain, Akanksha; Okamoto, Ryoko; Santel, Malgorzata et al. (2023). "Inferring and perturbing cell fate regulomes in human brain organoids". Nature 621 (7978): 365–372. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05279-8. PMID 36198796. Bibcode: 2023Natur.621..365F. 
  52. ↑ Stoeckius, Marlon; Hafemeister, Christoph; Stephenson, William; Houck-Loomis, Brian; Chattopadhyay, Pratip K; Swerdlow, Harold; Sajita, Rahul; Smibert, Peter (2017). "Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells". Nat Methods 14 (9): 865–868. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4380. PMID 28759029. 
  53. ↑ Atta, Lyla; Fan, Jean (2021). "Computational challenges and opportunities in spatially resolved transcriptomic data analysis". Nat Commun 12 (1): 5283. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25557-9. PMID 34489425. Bibcode: 2021NatCo..12.5283A. 
  54. ↑ Andersson, Alma; Bergenstråhle, Joseph; Asp, Michaela; Jurek, Aleksandra; Fernández Navarro, José; Lundeberg, Joakim (2020). "Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics enables probabilistic inference of cell type topography". Commun Biol 3 (1): 565. doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01247-y. PMID 33037292. 
  55. ↑ Ma, Ying; Zhou, Xiang (2022). "Spatially informed cell-type deconvolution for spatial transcriptomics". Nat Biotechnol 40 (9): 1349–1359. doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01273-7. PMID 35501392. 



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Single-cell_multi-omics_integration&oldid=4315602"