Biology:Spinosauridae

From HandWiki
Short description: Family of dinosaurs

Spinosaurids
Temporal range: Early Cretaceous–Late Cretaceous, 139–93 Ma
Possible Santonian record,[1][2] but see.[3] Possible Middle Jurassic record.[4]
Spinosauridae Diversity.jpg
Montage of four spinosaurids, clockwise from top left: Baryonyx, Irritator, Spinosaurus and Suchomimus
Scientific classification e
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade: Theropoda
Clade: Avetheropoda
Infraorder: †Carnosauria (?)
Family: †Spinosauridae
Stromer, 1915
Type species
†Spinosaurus aegyptiacus
Stromer, 1915
Subgroups

*disputed validity; =Spinosaurus?[5][6][7]

Synonyms
  • Baryonychidae Charig & Milner, 1986
  • Irritatoridae Martill et al., 1996
  • Sigilmassasauridae Russell, 1996

The Spinosauridae (or spinosaurids) are a clade or family of tetanuran theropod dinosaurs comprising ten to seventeen known genera. Spinosaurid fossils have been recovered worldwide, including Africa, Europe, South America and Asia. Their remains have generally been attributed to the Early to Mid Cretaceous.

Spinosaurids were large bipedal carnivores. Their crocodilian-like skulls were long, low and narrow, bearing conical teeth with reduced or absent serrations. The tips of their upper and lower jaws fanned out into a spoon-shaped structure similar to a rosette, behind which there was a notch in the upper jaw that the expanded tip of the lower jaw fit into. The nostrils of spinosaurids were retracted to a position further back on the head than in most other theropods, and they had bony crests on their heads along the midline of their skulls. Their robust shoulders wielded stocky forelimbs, with three-fingered hands that bore an enlarged claw on the first digit. In many species, the upwards-projecting neural spines of the vertebrae (backbones) were significantly elongated and formed a sail on the animal's back (hence the family's etymology), which supported either a layer of skin or a fatty hump.

The genus Spinosaurus, from which the family, one of its subfamilies (Spinosaurinae) and tribes (Spinosaurini) borrow their names, is the longest known terrestrial predator from the fossil record, with an estimated length of up to 14 meters (46 ft) and body mass of up to 7.4 metric tons (8.2 short tons). The closely related genus Sigilmassasaurus may have reached a similar or greater size, though its taxonomy is disputed. Direct fossil evidence and anatomical adaptations indicate that spinosaurids were at least partially piscivorous (fish-eating), with additional fossil finds indicating they also fed on other dinosaurs and pterosaurs. The osteology of spinosaurid teeth and bones has suggested a semiaquatic lifestyle for some members of this clade. This is further indicated by various anatomical adaptations, such as retracted eyes and nostrils; and the deepening of the tail in some taxa, which has been suggested to have aided in underwater propulsion akin to that of modern crocodilians. Spinosaurs are proposed to be closely related to the megalosaurid theropods of the Jurassic. This is due to both groups sharing many features such an enlarged claw on their first manual ungual and an elongated skull.[8] However, some propose that this group (which is known as the Megalosauroidea) is paraphyletic and that spinosaurs represent either the most basal tetanurans[9] or as basal carnosaurs which are less derived than the megalosaurids.[10] Some have proposed a combination of the two ideas with spinosaurs being in a monophyletic Megalosauroidea inside a more inclusive Carnosauria that is made up of both allosauroids and megalosauroids.[11]

History of discovery

Elements of the holotype specimen of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, as illustrated by Ernst Stromer in 1915

The first spinosaurid fossil, a single conical tooth, was discovered circa 1820 by British paleontologist Gideon Mantell in the Wadhurst Clay Formation.[12] In 1841, naturalist Sir Richard Owen mistakenly assigned it to a crocodilian he named Suchosaurus (meaning "crocodile lizard").[13][14] A second species, S. girardi, was later named in 1897.[15] However, the spinosaurid nature of Suchosaurus was not recognized until a 1998 redescription of Baryonyx.[16]

The first fossils referred to a spinosaurid were discovered in 1912 at the Bahariya Formation in Egypt. Consisting of vertebrae, skull fragments, and teeth, these remains became the holotype specimen of the new genus and species Spinosaurus aegyptiacus in 1915, when they were described by German paleontologist Ernst Stromer. The dinosaur's name meant "Egyptian spine lizard", in reference to the unusually long neural spines not seen previously in any other theropod. In April 1944, the holotype of S. aegyptiacus was destroyed during an allied bombing raid in World War II.[17][18] In 1934, Stromer referred a partial skeleton also from the Bahariya Formation to a new species of Spinosaurus;[19] the specimen has since been alternatively assigned to another African spinosaurid, Sigilmassasaurus.[20]

In 1983, a relatively complete skeleton was excavated from the Smokejacks pit in Surrey, England . These remains were described by British paleontologists Alan J. Charig and Angela C. Milner in 1986 as the holotype of a new species, Baryonyx walkeri. After the discovery of Baryonyx, many new genera have since been described, with the majority from very incomplete remains. However, other finds bear enough fossil material and distinct anatomical features to be assigned with confidence. Paul Sereno and colleagues described Suchomimus in 1998, a baryonychine from Niger, on the basis of a partial skeleton found in 1997. In 2004, partial jaw bones were recovered from the Alcântara Formation, these were referred to a new genus of spinosaurine named Oxalaia in 2011 by Alexander Kellner.[18]

On 2021 a recent discovery in Isle of Wight an island off the south coast of England, remains of a spinosaurid which is said to be of a new species is found. As per the findings, it is about 10 meters in length and weighed several tons. The prehistoric bones of the spinosaurid were found in a geological layer of rock known as the Vectis Formation in Compton Chine, it is the first identifiable theropod from the Vectis Formation. The study was led by Christopher Barker, a PhD doctoral student in vertebrate paleontology at the University of Southampton.[21]

Description

Size comparison of spinosaurid genera (from left to right) Irritator, Baryonyx, Oxalaia, Spinosaurus, Suchomimus, and Ichthyovenator with a human

Although reliable size and weight estimates for most known spinosaurids are hindered by the lack of good material, all known spinosaurids were large animals.[18] The smallest genus known from good material is Irritator, which was between 6 and 8 meters (20 and 26 feet) long and around 1 metric ton (1.1 short tons; 0.98 long tons) in weight.[22][23] Ichthyovenator, Baryonyx, and Suchomimus ranged from 7.5 to 11 m (25 to 36 ft) long, and weighed between 1 and 5.2 t (1.1 and 5.7 short tons; 0.98 and 5.12 long tons).[24][23][25] Oxalaia may have reached a length of between 12 and 14 m (39 and 46 ft) and a weight of 5 to 7 t (5.5 to 7.7 short tons; 4.9 to 6.9 long tons).[26] The largest known genus is Spinosaurus, which was capable of reaching lengths of 14 m (46 ft) and weighed around 7.4 t (8.2 short tons; 7.3 long tons), making it the longest known theropod dinosaur and terrestrial predator.[27] The closely allied Sigilmassasaurus may have grown to a similar or greater length, though its taxonomic relationship with Spinosaurus is uncertain.[28] This consistency in large body size among spinosaurids could have evolved as a byproduct of their preference for semiaquatic lifestyles, as without the need to compete with other large theropod dinosaurs for food, they would have been able to grow to massive lengths.[29]

Skull

Annotated skull diagram of Spinosaurus

Spinosaurid skulls—similar in many respects to those of crocodilians—were long, low and narrow.[18] As in other theropods, various fenestrae (openings) in the skull aided in reducing its weight. In spinosaurs however, the antorbital fenestrae were greatly reduced, akin to those of crocodilians.[30] The tips of the premaxillae (frontmost snout bones) were expanded in a spoon shape, forming what has been called a "terminal rosette" of enlarged teeth. Behind this expansion, the upper jaw had a notch bearing significantly smaller teeth, into which the also expanded tips of the dentaries (tooth bearing bones of the mandible) fit into, with a notch behind the expansion of the dentary.[18] The maxillae (main upper jaw bones) were long and formed a low branch under the nostrils that connected to the rear of the premaxillae. The teeth at the frontmost part of the maxillae were small, becoming significantly larger soon after and then gradually decreasing in size towards the back of the jaw.[31] Analysis of the teeth of spinosaurids and their comparison to the teeth of tyrannosaurids suggest that the deep roots of spinosaurids helped to better anchor the teeth of these animals and distribute the stress against lateral forces generated during bites in predation and feeding scenarios.[32]

Closeup of the teeth of Suchomimus

Despite their highly modified skulls, analysis of the endocasts of Baryonyx walkeri and Ceratosuchops inferodios reveals spinosaurid brains shared a high degree of similarity with those of other non-maniraptoriform theropods.[33]

Lengthwise atop their skulls ran a thin and shallow sagittal crest that was usually tallest near or above the eyes, either becoming shorter or disappearing entirely towards the front of the head.[18][34][35] Spinosaurus's head crest was comb-shaped and bore distinct vertical grooves,[34] while those of Baryonyx and Suchomimus looked like small triangular bumps.[36][7] Irritator's median crest stopped above and behind the eyes in a bulbous, flattened shape. However, given that no fully preserved skulls are known for the genus, the complete shape of Irritator's crest is unknown.[31] Cristatusaurus and Suchomimus (a possible synonym of the former) both had narrow premaxillary crests.[37] Angaturama (a possible synonym of Irritator) had an unusually tall crest on its premaxillae that nearly overhung the tip of the snout with a small forward protrusion.[35]

Spinosaurid nostrils were set far back on the skull, at least behind the teeth of the premaxillae, instead of at the front of the snout as in most theropods.[18] Those of Baryonyx and Suchomimus were large and started between the first and fourth maxillary teeth, while Spinosaurus's nostrils were far smaller and more retracted. Irritator's nostrils were positioned similarly to those of Baryonyx and Suchomimus, and were between those of Spinosaurus and Suchomimus in size.[35] Spinosaurids had long secondary palates, bony and rugose structures on the roof of their mouths that are also found in extant crocodilians, but not in most theropod dinosaurs.[30] Oxalaia had a particularly elaborate secondary palate, while most spinosaurs had smoother ones.[26] The teeth of spinosaurids were conical, with an oval to circular cross section and either absent or very fine serrations. Their teeth ranged from slightly recurved, such as those of Baryonyx and Suchomimus, to straight, such as those of Spinosaurus and Siamosaurus, and the crown was often ornamented with longitudinal grooves or ridges.[35][38]

Postcranial skeleton

Hand of spinosaurid specimen MN-4819-V (possibly belonging to Angaturama); note the enlarged condition of the first claw
Reconstructed foot bones of Spinosaurus; note the straight claws and enlarged hallux (first toe) touching the ground

The coracoid bones of the shoulders in spinosaurids were robust and hook shaped.[7] The arms were relatively large and well-built; the radius (long bone of the forearm) was stout and usually only half as long as the humerus (upper arm bone). Spinosaurid hands had three fingers, typical of tetanurans, and wielded an enlarged ungual on the first finger (or "thumb"), which formed the bony core of a keratin claw. In genera like Baryonyx and Suchomimus, the phalanges (finger bones) were of conventional length for large theropods, and bore hook-shaped, strongly curved hand claws.[18][24] Based on fragmentary material from the forelimbs of Spinosaurus, it appears to have had longer, more gracile hands and straighter claws than other spinosaurids.[39]

The hindlimbs of Suchomimus and Baryonyx were somewhat short and mostly conventional of other megalosauroid theropods.[18][24] Ichthyovenator's hip region was reduced, having the shortest pubis (pubic bone) and ischium (lower and rearmost hip bone) in proportion to the ilium (main hip bone) of any other known theropod.[40] Spinosaurus had an even smaller pelvis and hindlimbs in proportion to its body size; its legs composed just over 25 percent of the total body length. Substantially complete spinosaurid foot remains are only known from Spinosaurus. Unlike most theropods—which walk on three toes, with the hallux (first toe) being reduced and elevated off the ground—Spinosaurus walked on four functional toes, with an enlarged hallux that came in contact with the ground. The unguals of its feet, in contrast with the deeper, smaller and recurved unguals of other theropods, were shallow, long, large in relation to the foot, and had flat bottoms. Based on comparisons with those of modern shorebirds, it is possible that Spinosaurus's feet were webbed.[39]

Reconstructed neural spine sails of four spinosaurids; clockwise from top left: Spinosaurus, Irritator, Ichthyovenator, and Suchomimus.

The upward-projecting neural spines of spinosaurid vertebrae (backbones) were very tall, more so than in most theropods. In life, these spines would have been covered in skin or fat tissue and formed a sail down the animal's back, a condition that has also been observed in some carcharodontosaurid and ornithopod dinosaurs.[18][41] The eponymous neural spines of Spinosaurus were extremely tall, measuring over 1 m (3 ft 3 in) in height on some of the dorsal (back) vertebrae.[42] Suchomimus had a lower, ridge-like sail across the majority of its back, hip, and tail region.[7] Baryonyx showed a reduced sail, with a few of the rearmost vertebral spines being somewhat elongated.[36] Ichthyovenator had a sinusoidal (wave-like) sail that was separated in two over the hips, with the upper ends of some neural spines being broad and fan-shaped.[40] A neural spine from the holotype of Vallibonavenatrix shows a similar morphology to those of Ichthyovenator, indicating the presence of a sail in this genus as well.[43] One partial skeleton possibly referable to Angaturama also had elongated neural spines on its hip region.[44][45] The presence of a sail in fragmentary taxa like Sigilmassasaurus is unknown.[20] In members of the subfamily Spinosaurinae, like Ichthyovenator and Spinosaurus, the neural spines of the caudal (tail) vertebrae were tall and reclined, accompanied by also elongated chevrons—long, thin bones that form the underside of the tail. This was most pronounced in Spinosaurus, in which the spines and chevrons formed a large paddle-like structure, deepening the tail significantly along most of its length.[46][28]

Classification

Diagram illustrating various spinosaurids

The family Spinosauridae was named by Stromer in 1915 to include the single genus Spinosaurus. The clade was expanded as more close relatives of Spinosaurus were uncovered. The first cladistic definition of Spinosauridae was provided by Paul Sereno in 1998 (as "All spinosauroids closer to Spinosaurus than to Torvosaurus").[7]

Traditionally, Spinosauridae is divided into two subfamilies: Spinosaurinae, which contains the genera Icthyovenator, Irritator, Oxalaia, Sigilmassasaurus and Spinosaurus, is marked by unserrated, straight teeth, and external nares which are further back on the skull than in baryonychines,[7][47] and Baryonychinae, which contains the genera Baryonyx, Cristatusaurus, Suchosaurus, Suchomimus, Ceratosuchops, and Riparovenator,[48] which is marked by serrated, slightly curved teeth, smaller size, and more teeth in the lower jaw behind the terminal rosette than in spinosaurines.[7][47] Others, such as Siamosaurus, may belong to either Baryonychinae or Spinosaurinae, but are too incompletely known to be assigned with confidence.[48] Siamosaurus was classified as a spinosaurine in 2018, but the results are provisional and not entirely conclusive.[28]

The subfamily Spinosaurinae was named by Sereno in 1998, and defined by Thomas Holtz and colleagues in 2004 as all taxa closer to Spinosaurus aegyptiacus than to Baryonyx walkeri. The subfamily Baryonychinae was named by Charig & Milner in 1986. They erected both the subfamily and the family Baryonychidae for the newly discovered Baryonyx, before it was referred to Spinosauridae. Their subfamily was defined by Holtz and colleagues in 2004, as the complementary clade of all taxa closer to Baryonyx walkeri than to Spinosaurus aegyptiacus. Examinations in 2017 by Marcos Sales and Cesar Schultz indicate that the South American spinosaurids Angaturama and Irritator were intermediate between Baronychinae and Spinosaurinae based on their craniodental features and cladistic analysis. A study by Arden et al. 2018 named the tribe Spinosaurini to include Spinosaurus and Sigilmassasaurus,[28] the latter of which's validity as a spinosaurid is debated. In 2021 Barker et al. named the new tribe Ceratosuchopsini within the Baryonychinae to encompass Suchomimus, Riparovenator, and Ceratosuchops.[1]

The 2017 study mentioned above indicates that Baryonychinae may in fact be non-monophyletic. Their cladogram can be seen below.[35]

Skeletons of Suchomimus (above) and Baryonyx (below) to scale
Spinosauridae
 

Baryonyx Baryonyx walkeri restoration.jpg

 
  Cristatusaurus
Cristatusaurus lapparenti by PaleoGeek.png
 
  Suchomimus
Suchomimus tenerensis by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
  Angaturama
Irritator challengeri by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
  Oxalaia
Oxalaia quilombensis by PaleoGeek.png
 
  Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
 
 

The next cladogram displays an analysis of Tetanurae simplified to show only Spinosauridae from Allain colleagues in 2012:[40]

Spinosauridae
Spinosaurinae
  Irritator
Irritator challengeri by PaleoGeek.png
 
  Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
Baryonychinae
  Ichthyovenator
Ichthyovenator laosensis by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
  Suchomimus
Suchomimus tenerensis by PaleoGeek.png
 
 

Baryonyx Baryonyx walkeri restoration.jpg

 
 
 
 

The 2018 phylogenetic analysis by Arden and colleagues, which included many unnamed taxa, resolved Baryonychinae as monophyletic, and also coined the new term Spinosaurini for the clade of Sigilmassasaurus and Spinosaurus.[28]

Spinosauridae
 

Praia das Aguncheiras taxon (Iberospinus)

 
Baryonychinae
 

Baryonyx walkeri Baryonyx walkeri restoration.jpg

 
  Suchomimus tenerensis
Suchomimus tenerensis by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
Spinosaurinae
  Siamosaurus suteethorni
Siamosaurus suteethorni by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
 

Eumeralla taxon[49]

 
 
  Ichthyovenator laosensis
Ichthyovenator laosensis by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
  Irritator challengeri
Irritator challengeri by PaleoGeek.png
 
  Oxalaia quilombensis
Oxalaia quilombensis by PaleoGeek.png
 
Spinosaurini
 

Gara Samani taxon

 
  Sigilmassasaurus brevicollis
Sigilmassasaurus brevicollis by PaleoGeek.png
 
  Spinosaurus aegyptiacus
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

In 2021, Chris Barker, Hone, Darren Naish, Andrea Cau, Lockwood, Foster, Clarkin, Schneider, and Gostling described two new spinosaurid species, Ceratosuchops inferodios and Riparovenator milnerae. In the paper, they performed a phylogenetic analysis incorporating a general range of theropods, but mostly focusing on Spinosauridae. The results of the analysis appear below:[1]

 

Megalosauridae Torvosaurus tanneri Reconstruction (Flipped).png

 
Spinosauridae
  Vallibonavenatrix
Vallibonavenatrix cani by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
Baryonychinae
 
  Iberospinus
Iberospinus natarioi by PaleoGeek.png
 
 

Baryonyx Baryonyx walkeri restoration.jpg

 
 
Ceratosuchopsini
  Suchomimus
Suchomimus tenerensis by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
  Riparovenator
Riparovenator milnerae by PaleoGeek v2.png
 
  Ceratosuchops
Ceratosuchops inferodios by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
 
 
Spinosaurinae
  Camarillasaurus
Camarillasaurus restoration.jpg
 
 
  Ichthyovenator
Ichthyovenator laosensis by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
  Irritator
Irritator challengeri by PaleoGeek.png
 
Spinosaurini
  Sigilmassasaurus
Sigilmassasaurus brevicollis by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
 

"Spinosaurus B"

 
 
 

MSNM V4047

 
 
 

FSAC-KK 11888

 
  Spinosaurus holotype
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus by PaleoGeek.png
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

See also the phylogenetic results in the 2022 article describing Iberospinus.[50]

Evolution

Map of Europe and North Africa
Distribution of spinosaurids in Europe and North Africa during the Cretaceous; 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 are Baryonyx

Spinosaurids appear to have been widespread from the Barremian to the Cenomanian stages of the Cretaceous period, about 130 to 95 million years ago, while the oldest known spinosaurid remains date to the Middle Jurassic.[51] They shared features such as long, narrow, crocodile-like skulls; sub-circular teeth, with fine to no serrations; the terminal rosette of the snout; and a secondary palate that made them more resistant to torsion. In contrast, the primitive and typical condition for theropods was a tall, narrow snout with blade-like (ziphodont) teeth with serrated carinae.[52] The skull adaptations of spinosaurids converged with those of crocodilians; early members of the latter group had skulls similar to typical theropods, later developing elongated snouts, conical teeth, and secondary palates. These adaptations may have been the result of a dietary change from terrestrial prey to fish. Unlike crocodiles, the post-cranial skeletons of baryonychine spinosaurids do not appear to have aquatic adaptations.[5][52] Sereno and colleagues proposed in 1998 that the large thumb-claw and robust forelimbs of spinosaurids evolved in the Middle Jurassic, before the elongation of the skull and other adaptations related to fish-eating, since the former features are shared with their megalosaurid relatives. They also suggested that the spinosaurines and baryonychines diverged before the Barremian age of the Early Cretaceous.[53]

Several theories have been proposed about the biogeography of the spinosaurids. Since Suchomimus was more closely related to Baryonyx (from Europe) than to Spinosaurus—although that genus also lived in Africa—the distribution of spinosaurids cannot be explained as vicariance resulting from continental rifting.[53] Sereno and colleagues[53] proposed that spinosaurids were initially distributed across the supercontinent Pangea, but split with the opening of the Tethys Sea. Spinosaurines would then have evolved in the south (Africa and South America: in Gondwana) and baryonychines in the north (Europe: in Laurasia), with Suchomimus the result of a single north-to-south dispersal event.[53] Buffetaut and the Tunisian palaeontologist Mohamed Ouaja also suggested in 2002 that baryonychines could be the ancestors of spinosaurines, which appear to have replaced the former in Africa.[54] Milner suggested in 2003 that spinosaurids originated in Laurasia during the Jurassic, and dispersed via the Iberian land bridge into Gondwana, where they radiated.[55] In 2007, Buffetaut pointed out that palaeogeographical studies had demonstrated that Iberia was near northern Africa during the Early Cretaceous, which he found to confirm Milner's idea that the Iberian region was a stepping stone between Europe and Africa, which is supported by the presence of baryonychines in Iberia. The direction of the dispersal between Europe and Africa is still unknown,[56] and subsequent discoveries of spinosaurid remains in Asia and possibly Australia indicate that it may have been complex.[57]

In 2016, the Spanish palaeontologist Alejandro Serrano-Martínez and colleagues reported the oldest known spinosaurid fossil, a tooth from the Middle Jurassic of Niger, which they found to suggest that spinosaurids originated in Gondwana, since other known Jurassic spinosaurid teeth are also from Africa, but they found the subsequent dispersal routes unclear.[51] Some later studies instead suggested this tooth belonged to a megalosaurid.[58][59] Candeiro and colleagues suggested in 2017 that spinosaurids of northern Gondwana were replaced by other predators, such as abelisauroids, since no definite spinosaurid fossils are known from after the Cenomanian anywhere in the world. They attributed the disappearance of spinosaurids and other shifts in the fauna of Gondwana to changes in the environment, perhaps caused by transgressions in sea level.[60] Malafaia and colleagues stated in 2020 that Baryonyx remains the oldest unquestionable spinosaurid, while acknowledging that older remains had also been tentatively assigned to the group.[61] Barker and colleagues found support for a European origin for spinosaurids in 2021, with an expansion to Asia and Gondwana during the first half of the Early Cretaceous. In contrast to Sereno, these authors suggested there had been at least two dispersal events from Europe to Africa, leading to Suchomimus and the African part of Spinosaurinae.[62]

Paleobiology

Diet and feeding

Comparison of a spinosaurid skull with that of Dubreuillosaurus and two extant pike conger eels

Spinosaurid teeth resemble those of crocodiles, which are used for piercing and holding prey. Therefore, teeth with small or no serrations, such as in spinosaurids, were not good for cutting or ripping into flesh but instead helped to ensure a strong grip on a struggling prey animal.[63] Spinosaurid jaws were likened by Romain Vullo and colleagues to those of the pike conger eel, in what they hypothesized was convergent evolution for aquatic feeding. Both kinds of animals have some teeth in the end of the upper and lower jaws that are larger than the others and an area of the upper jaw with smaller teeth, creating a gap into which the enlarged teeth of the lower jaw fit, with the full structure called a terminal rosette.[64]

Life restoration of Baryonyx with a fish in its jaws

In the past, spinosaurids have often been considered piscivores (fish-eaters) in the main, based on comparisons of their jaws with those of modern crocodilians.[47] In 2007, British paleontologist Emily J. Rayfield and colleagues conducted biomechanical studies on the skull of Baryonyx, which had a long, laterally compressed skull, comparing it to gharial (long, narrow, tubular) and alligator (flat and wide) skulls. They found that the structure of baryonychine jaws converged on that of gharials, in that the two taxa showed similar response patterns to stress from simulated feeding loads, and did so with and without the presence of a (simulated) secondary palate. The gharial, exemplar of a long, narrow, and tubular snout, is a fish specialist. However, this snout anatomy does not preclude other options for the spinosaurids. The gharial is the most extreme example and a fish specialist; Australian freshwater crocodiles, which have similarly shaped skulls to gharials, also specialize more on fish than sympatric, broad snouted crocodiles and are opportunistic feeders which eat all manner of small aquatic prey, including insects and crustaceans. Thus, spinosaurids' snouts correlate with piscivory; this is consistent with hypotheses of this diet for spinosaurids, in particular baryonychines, but it does not indicate that they were solely piscivorous.[30]

Life restoration of the head of Spinosaurus

Further study by Andrew R. Cuff and Rayfield in 2013 on the skulls of Spinosaurus and Baryonyx did not recover similarities in the skulls of Baryonyx and the gharial that the previous study did. Baryonyx had, in models where the size difference of the skulls was corrected for, greater resistance to torsion and dorsoventral bending than both Spinosaurus and the gharial, while both spinosaurids were inferior to the gharial, alligator, and slender-snouted crocodile in resisting torsion and medio-lateral bending. When the results from the modeling were not scaled according to size, then both spinosaurids performed better than all the crocodilians in resistance to bending and torsion, due to their larger size. Thus, Cuff and Rayfield suggested that the skulls were not efficiently built to deal well with relatively large, struggling prey, but that spinosaurids may overcome prey simply by their size advantage, and not skull build.[65] In 2002, Hans-Dieter Sues and colleagues studied the construction of the spinosaurid skull, and concluded that their mode of feeding was to use extremely quick, powerful strikes to seize small prey items using their jaws, whilst employing the powerful neck muscles in rapid up-and-down motion. Due to the narrow snout, vigorous side-to-side motion of the skull during prey capture is unlikely.[63] Based on the size and positions of their nostrils, Marcos Sales and Cesar Schultz in 2017 suggested that Spinosaurus possessed a greater reliance on its sense of smell and had a more piscivorous lifestyle than Irritator and baryonychines.[35]

Reconstructed skeleton holding a pterosaur in its jaws against a painted backdrop
Reconstructed Irritator skeleton mounted as attacking an anhanguerid pterosaur, National Museum of Rio de Janeiro

Direct fossil evidence shows that spinosaurids fed on fish as well as a variety of other small to medium-sized animals, including dinosaurs. Baryonyx was found with scales of the prehistoric fish Scheenstia in its body cavity, and these were abraded, hypothetically by gastric juices. Bones of a young Iguanodon, also abraded, were found alongside this specimen. If these represent Baryonyx’s meal, the animal was, whether in this case a hunter, or a scavenger, an eater of more diverse fare than fish.[47][63][36] Moreover, there is a documented example of a spinosaurid having eaten a pterosaur, as one Irritator tooth was found lodged within the fossil vertebrae of an ornithocheirid pterosaur found in the Romualdo Formation of Brazil. This may represent a predation or a scavenging event.[66][67] A fossil snout referred to Spinosaurus was discovered with a vertebra from the sclerorhynchid Onchopristis embedded in it.[34] In the Sao Khua Formation of Thailand, isolated tooth crowns from Siamosaurus have been found in association with sauropod remains, indicating possible predation or scavenging.[68] The Portuguese Iberospinus fossils were also found associated with isolated Iguanodon teeth, and those cases are listed; along with other such associations as support for opportunistic feeding behaviour in spinosaurids.[69]

A 2018 study by Auguste Hassler and colleagues of calcium isotopes in the teeth of North African theropods found that spinosaurids had a mixed diet of fish and herbivorous dinosaurs, whereas the other theropods examined (abelisaurids and carcharodontosaurids) mainly fed on herbivorous dinosaurs. This might indicate ecological partitioning between these theropods.[70] Later in 2018, Tito Aureliano and colleagues presented a possible scenario for the food web of Brazilian Romualdo Formation. The researchers proposed that the diet of spinosaurines from this environment may have included—in addition to pterosaurs—terrestrial and aquatic crocodyliforms, juveniles of their own species, turtles, and small to medium-sized dinosaurs. This would have made spinosaurines apex predators within this particular ecosystem.[29]

Forelimb function

Reconstructed forelimb and hand of Suchomimus, Museum of Ancient Life, Utah

The use of the robust forelimbs and giant recurved claws of spinosaurs remains a debated topic. Charig and Milner speculated in 1986 that Baryonyx may have crouched by the riverbank and used its claws to gaff fish out of the water, similarly to grizzly bears.[71] In 1987, British biologist Andrew Kitchener argued that with both its crocodile-like snout and enlarged claws, Baryonyx seemed to have too many adaptations for piscivory when one would have been enough. Kitchener instead postulated that Baryonyx more likely used its arms to scavenge the corpses of large dinosaurs, such as Iguanodon, by breaking into the carcass with the large claws, and subsequently probing for viscera with its long snout.[72] In their 1997 article, Charig and Milner rejected this hypothesis, pointing out that in most cases, a carcass would have already been largely emptied out by its initial predators.[36] Later research has also ruled out this sort of specialized scavenging.[18]

In 1986, Charig and Milner suggested that the robust forelimbs and giant thumb claws would have been Baryonyx's primary method of capturing, killing, and tearing apart large prey; whereas its long snout would have been used mostly for fishing.[36] A 2005 study by Canadian paleontologist the François Therrien and colleagues agreed that spinosaur forelimbs were probably used for hunting larger prey items, given that their snouts could not resist the bending stress.[73] In a 2017 review of the family, David Hone and Holtz considered possible functions in digging for water sources or hard to reach prey, as well as burrowing into soil to construct nests.[18]

Cranial crests and neural spines

Head silhouettes of Irritator and Angaturama with respective skull bones overlaid onto them, the Angaturama specimen is larger and overlaps with that of Irritator by one tooth
Holotype skull specimens of Irritator challengeri (top, showing the beginnings of a nasal crest) and Angaturama limai (bottom, showing a tall premaxillary crest)

Theropod heads are often decorated with some form of crest, horn, or rugose structure, which in life, would have been extended by keratin.[74] Though there has been little discussion on the head crests of spinosaurs, Hone and Holtz in 2017 considered that their most likely use was for displaying to potential mates or as a means of threatening rivals and other predators.[18] Such has been suggested for theropod cranial structures before, which may have been aided by unusual or bright coloration to provide further visual cues.[74]

Many theories have been proposed over the years for the use of spinosaurid dorsal sails, such as thermoregulation;[75] to aid in swimming;[76] to store energy or insulate the animal; or for display purposes, such as intimidating rivals and predators, or attracting mates.[77][78] Many elaborate body structures of modern-day animals serve to attract members of the opposite sex during mating. It is possible that the sail of Spinosaurus was used for courtship, in a way similar to a peacock's tail. In 1915, Stromer speculated that the size of the neural spines may have differed between males and females.[78] In 2012, French paleontologist Ronan Allain and colleagues suggested considering the high diversity in neural spine elongation observed in theropod dinosaurs, as well as histological research done on the sails of synapsids (stem mammals), the sinusoidal sail of Ichthyovenator was likely used for courtship display or recognising members of its own species.[79] In a 2013 blog post, Darren Naish considered the latter function unlikely, favouring the hypothesis of sexual selection for Ichthyovenator's sail because it appears to have evolved on its own, without very close relatives. Naish also notes it is possible similar relatives have not yet been discovered.[80]

In 2015, the German biophysicist Jan Gimsa and colleagues suggested that this feature could also have aided aquatic movement by improving manoeuvrability when submerged, and acted as fulcrum for powerful movements of the neck and tail (similar to those of sailfish or thresher sharks).[81][82]

Ontogeny

Juvenile spinosaurid fossils are somewhat rare. However, an ungual phalanx measuring 21 mm (0.83 in) belonging to a very young Spinosaurus indicates that Spinosaurus, and probably by extent other spinosaurids, may have developed their semiaquatic adaptations at birth or at a very young age and maintained the adaptations throughout their lives. The specimen, found in 1999 and described by Simone Maganuco, Cristiano Dal Sasso and colleagues in 2018, is believed to have come from a very small juvenile measuring 1.78 m (5.8 ft), making said specimen the smallest known example of a spinosaurid currently described.[83][84]

Paleoecology

Habitat preference

A 2010 publication by Romain Amiot and colleagues found that oxygen isotope ratios of spinosaurid bones indicates semiaquatic lifestyles. Isotope ratios from teeth from Baryonyx, Irritator, Siamosaurus, and Spinosaurus were compared with isotopic compositions from contemporaneous theropods, turtles, and crocodilians. The study found that, among theropods, spinosaurid isotope ratios were closer to those of turtles and crocodilians. Siamosaurus specimens tended to have the largest difference from the ratios of other theropods, and Spinosaurus tended to have the least difference. The authors concluded that spinosaurids, like modern crocodilians and hippopotamuses, spent much of their daily lives in water. The authors also suggested that semiaquatic habits and piscivory in spinosaurids can explain how spinosaurids coexisted with other large theropods: by feeding on different prey items and living in different habitats, the different types of theropods would have been out of direct competition.[85] In 2018, an analysis was conducted on the partial tibia of an indeterminate spinosaurine from the early Albian, the bone was from a sub-adult between 7 and 13 m (22 and 42 ft) in length still growing moderately fast before its death. This specimen (LPP-PV-0042) was found in the Araripe Basin of Brazil and taken to the University of San Carlos for a CT Scan, where it revealed osteosclerosis (high bone density).[29] This condition had previously only been observed in Spinosaurus, as a possible way of controlling its buoyancy.[39] The presence of this condition on the leg fragment showed that semi-aquatic adaptations in spinosaurids were already present at least 10 million years before Spinosaurus aegyptiacus appeared. According to the phylogenetic bracketing method, this high bone density might have been present in all spinosaurines.[29] In 2020, a scientific paper by paleontologists published in the scientific journal Cretaceous Research found taphonomic evidence in the Kem Kem group that would support Spinosaurus being a semi-aquatic dinosaur.[86] However, research conducted in 2023 cited the immediate assumption of Spinosaurids being avid divers due to correlations in bone compactness as being subject to errors, such as flawed statistical methods and measurements, as well as sampling bias.[87]

A 2018 study of buoyancy (through simulation with 3D models) by the Canadian palaeontologist Donald M. Henderson found that distantly related theropods floated as well as the tested spinosaurs, and instead supported they would have stayed by the shorelines or shallow water rather than being semi-aquatic.[88]

Distribution

Generalized locations of spinosaurid fossil discoveries from the Bajocian–Bathonian (A), Tithonian (B), Barremian−Aptian (C), and Albian−Cenomanian (D) marked on maps of those time spans.

Confirmed spinosaurids have been found on every continent except for North America, Australia and Antarctica, the first of which was Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, discovered at the Bahariya Formation in Egypt.[78] Baryonychines were common, such as Baryonyx, which lived during the Barremian of England and Spain. Baryonyx-like teeth are also found from the earlier Hauterivian and later Aptian sediments of Spain, as well as the Hauterivian of England.[18][57] Baryonychines were represented in Africa, with Suchomimus tenerensis and Cristatusaurus lapparenti as well as Baryonyx-like teeth from the Aptian of Niger.[48][7][89] as well as in Europe, with Suchosaurus cultridens and S. girardi from the England. Baryonyx-like teeth are also reported from the Ashdown Sands of Sussex, in England, and the Burgos Province, in Spain.[57] Other European spinosaurids Camarillasaurus cirugedae and Iberospinus natarioi are known from the Barremian of Spain and Portugal, respectively.[90][50]

The earliest record of spinosaurines is from Europe, with the Barremian species Vallibonavenatrix cani from Spain.[43] Spinosaurines are also present in Albian sediments of Tunisia and Algeria, and in Cenomanian sediments of Egypt and Morocco. In Africa, baryonychines were common in the Aptian, and then replaced by spinosaurines in the Albian and Cenomanian.[48] such as in the Kem Kem beds of Morocco, which housed an ecosystem containing many large coexisting predators.[37][85] A fragment of a spinosaurine lower jaw from the Early Cretaceous was also reported from Tunisia, and referred to Spinosaurus.[48] Spinosaurinae's range also extended to South America, particularly Brazil, with the discoveries of Irritator challengeri, Angaturama limai, and Oxalaia quilombensis.[67][26] There was also a fossil tooth in Argentina which has been referred to the Spinosauridae by Leonardo Salgado and colleagues.[91] This referral is doubted by Gengo Tanaka et al., who offers Hamadasuchus, a crocodilian, as the most likely animal of origin for these teeth.[92]

Partial skeletons and numerous fossil teeth indicate spinosaurids were widespread in Asia; three taxa—all spinosaurines—have been named: Siamosaurus suteethorni from Thailand, "Sinopliosaurus" fusuiensis from China, and Ichthyovenator laosensis from Laos.[40][48][2] Spinosaurid teeth have been found in Malaysia; they were the first dinosaur remains discovered in the country.[93] Some intermediate specimens extend the known range of spinosaurids past the youngest dates of named taxa. A single baryonychine tooth was found from the mid-Santonian, in the Majiacun Formation of Henan, China.[2] However, the tooth lacks spinosaurid synapomorphies.[3] At la Cantalera-1, a site in the early Barremian Blesa Formation in Treul, Spain, two types of spinosaurid teeth were found, and they were assigned, tentatively, as indeterminate spinosaurine and baryonychine taxa.[94] An indeterminate spinosaurid was discovered in the Early Cretaceous Eumeralla Formation, Australia.[95] It is known from a single 4 cm long partial cervical vertebra, designated NMV P221081. It is missing most of the neural arch. The specimen is from a juvenile estimated to be about 2 to 3 meters long (6–9 ft). Out of all spinosaurids, it most closely resembles Baryonyx.[49] In 2019, it was suggested that the vertebra instead belonged to a megaraptorid theropod, as opposed to a spinosaur.[96]

Timeline of genera

<timeline> ImageSize = width:800px height:auto barincrement:15px PlotArea = left:10px bottom:50px top:10px right:10px

Period = from:-201 till:-66 TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:10 start:-200 ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:-201 TimeAxis = orientation:hor AlignBars = justify

Colors = 

#legends
 id:CAR	  value:claret
 id:ANK 	 value:rgb(0.4,0.3,0.196)
 id:HER	  value:teal
 id:HAD	  value:green
 id:OMN	  value:blue
 id:black        value:black
 id:white        value:white
 id:jurassic     value:rgb(0.2,0.7,0.79) 
 id:earlyjurassic     value:rgb(0,0.69,0.89) 
 id:middlejurassic     value:rgb(0.52,0.81,0.91)
 id:latejurassic     value:rgb(0.74,0.89,0.97) 
 id:cretaceous   value:rgb(0.5,0.78,0.31)
 id:earlycretaceous   value:rgb(0.63,0.78,0.65)
 id:latecretaceous   value:rgb(0.74,0.82,0.37)

BarData= 

bar:eratop
bar:space
bar:periodtop
bar:space
bar:NAM1
bar:NAM2
bar:NAM3
bar:NAM4
bar:NAM5
bar:NAM6
bar:NAM7
bar:NAM8
bar:NAM9
bar:NAM10
bar:NAM11
bar:NAM12
bar:NAM13
bar:NAM14
bar:space
bar:period
bar:space
bar:era

PlotData= 

align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25 
shift:(7,-4)
 
bar:periodtop   
from: -201    till: -174   color:earlyjurassic    text:Early
from: -174    till: -163    color:middlejurassic    text:Middle
from: -163    till: -145    color:latejurassic    text:Late
from: -145    till: -100    color:earlycretaceous    text:Early
from: -100    till: -66    color:latecretaceous    text:Late

bar:eratop        
from: -201    till: -145    color:jurassic    text:Jurassic
from: -145   till: -66   color:cretaceous    text:Cretaceous

PlotData= 

align:left fontsize:M mark:(line,white) width:5 anchor:till align:left

color:cretaceous bar:NAM1  from:-130    till:-129 text:Siamosaurus
color:cretaceous bar:NAM2  from:-130    till:-125 text:Baryonyx
color:cretaceous bar:NAM3  from:-129    till:-125 text:Vallibonavenatrix
color:cretaceous bar:NAM4  from:-129    till:-125 text:Ceratosuchops
color:cretaceous bar:NAM5  from:-129    till:-125 text:Riparovenator
color:cretaceous bar:NAM6  from:-129    till:-125 text:Protathlitis
color:cretaceous bar:NAM7  from:-125    till:-120 text:Suchosaurus
color:cretaceous bar:NAM8  from:-125    till:-112 text:Cristatusaurus
color:cretaceous bar:NAM9  from:-121    till:-112 text:Suchomimus
color:cretaceous bar:NAM10 from:-115    till:-110 text:Ichthyovenator
color:cretaceous bar:NAM11 from:-110    till:-108 text:Irritator
color:cretaceous bar:NAM12 from:-100    till:-98 text:Oxalaia
color:cretaceous bar:NAM13 from:-100    till:-94 text:Sigilmassasaurus
color:cretaceous bar:NAM14 from:-112    till:-93.5 text:Spinosaurus

PlotData= 

align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25

bar:period          
from: -201    till: -174   color:earlyjurassic    text:Early
from: -174    till: -163    color:middlejurassic    text:Middle
from: -163    till: -145    color:latejurassic    text:Late
from: -145    till: -100    color:earlycretaceous    text:Early
from: -100    till: -66    color:latecretaceous    text:Late

bar:era        
from: -201    till: -145    color:jurassic    text:Jurassic
from: -145    till: -66   color:cretaceous    text:Cretaceous

</timeline>

Timeline of genera descriptions

<timeline> ImageSize = width:1000px height:auto barincrement:15px PlotArea = left:10px bottom:50px top:10px right:10px

Period = from:1820 till:2050 TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:50 start:1820 ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:10 start:1820 TimeAxis = orientation:hor AlignBars = justify

Colors = 

#legends
 id:CAR	  value:claret
 id:ANK 	 value:rgb(0.4,0.3,0.196)
 id:HER	  value:teal
 id:HAD	  value:green
 id:OMN	  value:blue
 id:black        value:black
 id:white        value:white
 id:1900s   value:rgb(0.94,0.25,0.24)
 id:2000s     value:rgb(0.2,0.7,0.79)
 id:2000syears     value:rgb(0.52,0.81,0.91) 
 id:1900syears   value:rgb(0.95,0.56,0.45)
 id:1700s   value:rgb(0.5,0.78,0.31)
 id:1700syears   value:rgb(0.63,0.78,0.65)
 id:latecretaceous   value:rgb(0.74,0.82,0.37)
  id:1800syears     value:rgb(0.95,0.98,0.11)
 id:paleogene     value:rgb(0.99,0.6,0.32) 
 id:paleocene     value:rgb(0.99,0.65,0.37) 
 id:eocene     value:rgb(0.99,0.71,0.42) 
 id:oligocene     value:rgb(0.99,0.75,0.48) 
 id:1800s     value:rgb(0.999999,0.9,0.1) 
 id:miocene     value:rgb(0.999999,0.999999,0) 
 id:pliocene     value:rgb(0.97,0.98,0.68)  
 id:quaternary   value:rgb(0.98,0.98,0.5)
 id:pleistocene   value:rgb(0.999999,0.95,0.68)
 id:holocene   value:rgb(0.999,0.95,0.88)

BarData= 

bar:eratop
bar:space
bar:periodtop
bar:space
bar:NAM1
bar:NAM2
bar:NAM3
bar:NAM4
bar:NAM5
bar:NAM6
bar:NAM7
bar:NAM8
bar:NAM9
bar:NAM10
bar:NAM11
bar:NAM12
bar:NAM13
bar:NAM14
bar:NAM15
bar:NAM16
bar:space
bar:period
bar:space
bar:era

PlotData= 

align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25 
shift:(7,-4)
 
bar:periodtop
from: 1820    till: 1830    color:1800syears    text:20s
from: 1830    till: 1840    color:1800syears    text:30s
from: 1840    till: 1850    color:1800syears    text:40s
from: 1850    till: 1860    color:1800syears    text:50s
from: 1860    till: 1870    color:1800syears    text:60s
from: 1870    till: 1880    color:1800syears    text:70s
from: 1880    till: 1890    color:1800syears    text:80s
from: 1890    till: 1900    color:1800syears    text:90s
from: 1900    till: 1910    color:1900syears    text:00s
from: 1910    till: 1920    color:1900syears    text:10s
from: 1920    till: 1930    color:1900syears    text:20s
from: 1930    till: 1940    color:1900syears    text:30s
from: 1940    till: 1950    color:1900syears    text:40s
from: 1950    till: 1960    color:1900syears    text:50s
from: 1960    till: 1970    color:1900syears    text:60s
from: 1970    till: 1980    color:1900syears    text:70s
from: 1980    till: 1990    color:1900syears    text:80s
from: 1990    till: 2000    color:1900syears    text:90s
from: 2000    till: 2010    color:2000syears    text:00s
from: 2010    till: 2020    color:2000syears    text:10s
from: 2020    till: 2030    color:2000syears    text:20s
from: 2030    till: 2040    color:2000syears    text:30s
from: 2040    till: 2050    color:2000syears    text:40s

bar:eratop         
from: 1820    till: 1900    color:1800s    text:19th
from: 1900    till: 2000    color:1900s    text:20th
from: 2000    till: 2050    color:2000s    text:21st

PlotData= 

align:left fontsize:M mark:(line,white) width:5 anchor:till align:left

color:1800s bar:NAM1 at:1841 mark:(line,black) text:Suchosaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:1915 mark:(line,black) text:Spinosaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM3 at:1986 mark:(line,black) text:Baryonyx
color:1900s bar:NAM4 at:1986 mark:(line,black) text:Siamosaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM5 at:1996 mark:(line,black) text:Angaturama
color:1900s bar:NAM6 at:1996 mark:(line,black) text:Irritator
color:1900s bar:NAM7 at:1996 mark:(line,black) text:Sigilmassasaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM8 at:1998 mark:(line,black) text:Suchomimus
color:1900s bar:NAM9 at:1998 mark:(line,black) text:Cristatusaurus
color:2000s bar:NAM10 at:2008 mark:(line,black) text:Sinopliosaurus fusuiensis
color:2000s bar:NAM11 at:2011 mark:(line,black) text:Oxalaia
color:2000s bar:NAM12 at:2012 mark:(line,black) text:Ichthyovenator
color:2000s bar:NAM13 at:2019 mark:(line,black) text:Vallibonavenatrix
color:2000s bar:NAM14 at:2021 mark:(line,black) text:Ceratosuchops
color:2000s bar:NAM15 at:2021 mark:(line,black) text:Riparovenator
color:2000s bar:NAM16 at:2023 mark:(line,black) text:Protathlitis

PlotData= 

align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25

bar:period
from: 1820    till: 1830    color:1800syears    text:20s
from: 1830    till: 1840    color:1800syears    text:30s
from: 1840    till: 1850    color:1800syears    text:40s
from: 1850    till: 1860    color:1800syears    text:50s
from: 1860    till: 1870    color:1800syears    text:60s
from: 1870    till: 1880    color:1800syears    text:70s
from: 1880    till: 1890    color:1800syears    text:80s
from: 1890    till: 1900    color:1800syears    text:90s
from: 1900    till: 1910    color:1900syears    text:00s
from: 1910    till: 1920    color:1900syears    text:10s
from: 1920    till: 1930    color:1900syears    text:20s
from: 1930    till: 1940    color:1900syears    text:30s
from: 1940    till: 1950    color:1900syears    text:40s
from: 1950    till: 1960    color:1900syears    text:50s
from: 1960    till: 1970    color:1900syears    text:60s
from: 1970    till: 1980    color:1900syears    text:70s
from: 1980    till: 1990    color:1900syears    text:80s
from: 1990    till: 2000    color:1900syears    text:90s
from: 2000    till: 2010    color:2000syears    text:00s
from: 2010    till: 2020    color:2000syears    text:10s
from: 2020    till: 2030    color:2000syears    text:20s
from: 2030    till: 2040    color:2000syears    text:30s
from: 2040    till: 2050    color:2000syears    text:40s

bar:era         
from: 1820    till: 1900    color:1800s    text:19th
from: 1900    till: 2000    color:1900s    text:20th
from: 2000    till: 2050    color:2000s    text:21st

</timeline>

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 T. Barker, C.; Hone, D.; Naish, D.; Cau, A.; Lockwood, J.; Foster, B.; Clarkin, C.; Schneider, P. et al. (2021). "New spinosaurids from the Wessex Formation (Early Cretaceous, UK) and the European origins of Spinosauridae". Scientific Reports 11 (1): 19340. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97870-8. PMID 34588472. Bibcode: 2021NatSR..1119340B. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Hone, David W. E.; Xing, X. U.; De-You, Wang (15 March 2010). "A PROBABLE BARYONYCHINE (THEROPODA: SPINOSAURIDAE) TOOTH FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF HENAN PROVINCE, CHINA". Vertebrata PalAsiatica 48 (1): 19. http://www.vertpala.ac.cn/EN/Y2010/V48/I1/19. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Katsuhiro, Kubota; Yuji, Takakuwa; Yoshikazu, Hasegawa (2017). "Second discovery of a spinosaurid tooth from the Sebayashi Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Kanna Town, Gunma Prefecture, Japan". Bulletin of the Gunma Museum of Natural History 21: 1–6. http://www.gmnh.pref.gunma.jp/wp-content/uploads/Second-discovery-of-a-spinosaurid-tooth-from-the-Sebayashi-Formation-Lower-Cretaceous-Kanna-Town-Gunma-Prefecture-Ja1.pdf. 
  4. ↑ Sharma, A.; Novas, Fernando E. (2023). "First Jurassic Evidence of a Possible Spinosaurid Pedal Ungual, from the Jaisalmer Basin, India". Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 29 (3): 653–670. doi:10.54103/2039-4942/20032. 
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Ibrahim, Nizar; Sereno, Paul C.; Dal Sasso, Cristiano; Maganuco, Simone; Fabri, Matteo; Martill, David M.; Zouhri, Samir; Myhrvold, Nathan et al. (2014). "Semiaquatic adaptations in a giant predatory dinosaur". Science 345 (6204): 1613–6. doi:10.1126/science.1258750. PMID 25213375. Bibcode: 2014Sci...345.1613I. https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/semiaquatic-adaptations-in-a-giant-predatory-dinosaur(8f11a1ce-3265-4b3b-8c81-6f576856a87f).html.  Supplementary Information
  6. ↑ Smyth, Robert S.H.; Ibrahim, Nizar; Martill, David M. (October 2020). "Sigilmassasaurus is Spinosaurus: A reappraisal of African spinosaurines". Cretaceous Research 114: 104520. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104520. Bibcode: 2020CrRes.11404520S. 
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 Sereno, Paul C.; Beck, Allison L.; Dutheil, Didier B.; Gado, Boubacar; Larsson, Hans C. E.; Lyon, Gabrielle H.; Marcot, Jonathan D.; Rauhut, Oliver W. M. et al. (13 November 1998). "A Long-Snouted Predatory Dinosaur from Africa and the Evolution of Spinosaurids". Science 282 (5392): 1298–1302. doi:10.1126/science.282.5392.1298. PMID 9812890. Bibcode: 1998Sci...282.1298S. 
  8. ↑ Benson, Rodger (2010). "A description of Megalosaurus bucklandii (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Bathonian of the UK and the relationships of Middle Jurassic theropods". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 158 (4): 882–935. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00569.x. 
  9. ↑ "A NEW PHYLOGENY OF THE CARNIVOROUS DINOSAURS". GAIA: 5–61. https://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/gaiaphyl.pdf. 
  10. ↑ Rauhut, Oliver (2019). "Probable basal allosauroid from the early Middle Jurassic Cañadón Asfalto Formation of Argentina highlights phylogenetic uncertainty in tetanuran theropod dinosaurs". Scientific Reports 9 (18826): 18826. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53672-7. PMID 31827108. Bibcode: 2019NatSR...918826R. 
  11. ↑ Rauhut, Oliver (2012). "Exceptionally preserved juvenile megalosauroid theropod dinosaur with filamentous integument from the Late Jurassic of Germany". PNAS 109 (29): 11746–11751. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203238109. PMID 22753486. Bibcode: 2012PNAS..10911746R. 
  12. ↑ Mantell, Gideon Algernon (1822). The fossils of the South Downs or, Illustrations of the geology of Sussex.. L. Relfe. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.44924. OCLC 754552732. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/97604. [page needed]
  13. ↑ Owen, R. (1840–1845). Odontography. London: Hippolyte Baillière, 655 pp, 1–32
  14. ↑ Owen, R., 1842, Report on British fossil reptiles. Part II. Reports of the meetings of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. 11, pp 61-204
  15. ↑ Sauvage, H. E. (1897–1898). Vertébrés fossiles du Portugal. Contribution à l’étude des poissons et des reptiles du Jurassique et du Crétacique. Lisbonne: Direction des Travaux géologiques du Portugal, 46p
  16. ↑ Milner, A., 2003, "Fish-eating theropods: A short review of the systematics, biology and palaeobiogeography of spinosaurs". In: Huerta Hurtado and Torcida Fernandez-Baldor (eds.). Actas de las II Jornadas Internacionales sobre Paleontologýa de Dinosaurios y su Entorno (2001). pp 129-138
  17. ↑ Smith, Joshua B.; Lamanna, Matthew C.; Mayr, Helmut; Lacovara, Kenneth J. (March 2006). "New Information Regarding the Holotype of Spinosaurus Aegyptiacus Stromer, 1915". Journal of Paleontology 80 (2): 400–406. doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2006)080[0400:NIRTHO2.0.CO;2]. 
  18. ↑ 18.00 18.01 18.02 18.03 18.04 18.05 18.06 18.07 18.08 18.09 18.10 18.11 18.12 18.13 Hone, David William Elliott; Holtz, Thomas Richard (June 2017). "A Century of Spinosaurs - A Review and Revision of the Spinosauridae with Comments on Their Ecology". Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition 91 (3): 1120–1132. doi:10.1111/1755-6724.13328. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/49404. 
  19. ↑ Stromer, E. (1934). "Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers in den Wüsten Ägyptens. II. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharije-Stufe (unterstes Cenoman). 13. Dinosauria" (in de). Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung. Neue Folge 22: 1–79. 
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 Evers, Serjoscha W.; Rauhut, Oliver W.M.; Milner, Angela C.; McFeeters, Bradley; Allain, Ronan (20 October 2015). "A reappraisal of the morphology and systematic position of the theropod dinosaur Sigilmassasaurus from the 'middle' Cretaceous of Morocco". PeerJ 3: e1323. doi:10.7717/peerj.1323. PMID 26500829. 
  21. ↑ Sana Noor Haq. "Scientists unearth remains of one of Europe's biggest predatory dinosaurs". https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/09/europe/spinosaurid-dinosaur-europe-intl-scn-scli/index.html. 
  22. ↑ Dixon, Dougal (2009) (in en). The Ultimate Guide to Dinosaurs. Ticktock Books. ISBN 9781846969881. https://archive.org/details/ultimateguidetod0000dixo. 
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 Holtz, Thomas R. Jr. (2011) Dinosaurs: The Most Complete, Up-to-Date Encyclopedia for Dinosaur Lovers of All Ages, Winter 2010 Appendix.
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 S., Paul, Gregory (2016-10-25). The Princeton field guide to dinosaurs (2nd ed.). Princeton, N.J.. ISBN 9781400883141. OCLC 954055249. 
  25. ↑ Therrien, François; Henderson, Donald M. (12 March 2007). "My theropod is bigger than yours … or not: estimating body size from skull length in theropods". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27 (1): 108–115. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2007)27[108:mtibty2.0.co;2]. 
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Kellner, Alexander WA.; Azevedo, Sergio A.K.; Machado, Elaine B.; Carvalho, Luciana B. de; Henriques, Deise D.R. (March 2011). "A new dinosaur (Theropoda, Spinosauridae) from the Cretaceous (Cenomanian) Alcântara Formation, Cajual Island, Brazil". Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 83 (1): 99–108. doi:10.1590/S0001-37652011000100006. PMID 21437377. 
  27. ↑ Sereno, Paul C.; Myhrvold, Nathan; Henderson, Donald M.; Fish, Frank E.; Vidal, Daniel; Baumgart, Stephanie L.; Keillor, Tyler M.; Formoso, Kiersten K.; Conroy, Lauren L. (2022). "Spinosaurus is not an aquatic dinosaur". bioRxiv 10.1101/2022.05.25.493395.
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.4 Arden, T.M.S.; Klein, C.G.; Zouhri, S.; Longrich, N.R. (2018). "Aquatic adaptation in the skull of carnivorous dinosaurs (Theropoda: Spinosauridae) and the evolution of aquatic habits in Spinosaurus". Cretaceous Research 93: 275–284. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2018.06.013. Bibcode: 2019CrRes..93..275A. 
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 Aureliano, Tito; Ghilardi, Aline M.; Buck, Pedro V.; Fabbri, Matteo; Samathi, Adun; Delcourt, Rafael; Fernandes, Marcelo A.; Sander, Martin (October 2018). "Semi-aquatic adaptations in a spinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil". Cretaceous Research 90: 283–295. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2018.04.024. Bibcode: 2018CrRes..90..283A. http://paleorxiv.org/mjt95/. 
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 Rayfield, Emily J.; Milner, Angela C.; Xuan, Viet Bui; Young, Philippe G. (12 December 2007). "Functional morphology of spinosaur 'crocodile-mimic' dinosaurs". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27 (4): 892–901. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2007)27[892:FMOSCD2.0.CO;2]. 
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 Sues, H. D.; Frey, E.; Martill, D. M.; Scott, D. M. (2002). "Irritator challengeri, a spinosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22 (3): 535–547. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2002)022[0535:ICASDT2.0.CO;2]. 
  32. ↑ Holtz, Thomas R. (2008). "A critical reappraisal of the obligate scavenging hypothesis for Tyrannosaurus rex and other tyrant dinosaurs". Tyrannosaurus Rex, the Tyrant King. Indiana University Press. pp. 371–396. ISBN 978-0253350879. https://books.google.com/books?id=5WH9RnfKco4C&pg=PA371. 
  33. ↑ Barker, Chris Tijani; Naish, Darren; Trend, Jacob; Michels, Lysanne Veerle; Witmer, Lawrence; Ridgley, Ryan; Rankin, Katy; Clarkin, Claire E. et al. (2023). "Modified skulls but conservative brains? The palaeoneurology and endocranial anatomy of baryonychine dinosaurs (Theropoda: Spinosauridae)". Journal of Anatomy 242 (6): 1124–1145. doi:10.1111/joa.13837. PMID 36781174. 
  34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 34.2 Sasso, Cristiano Dal; Maganuco, Simone; Buffetaut, Eric; Mendez, Marco A. (30 December 2005). "New information on the skull of the enigmatic theropod Spinosaurus , with remarks on its size and affinities". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25 (4): 888–896. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0888:NIOTSO2.0.CO;2]. 
  35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 35.2 35.3 35.4 35.5 Sales, M.A.F.; Schultz, C.L. (2017). "Spinosaur taxonomy and evolution of craniodental features: Evidence from Brazil". PLOS ONE 12 (11): e0187070. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187070. PMID 29107966. Bibcode: 2017PLoSO..1287070S. 
  36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 36.2 36.3 36.4 Charig, A. J.; Milner, A. C. (1997). "Baryonyx walkeri, a fish-eating dinosaur from the Wealden of Surrey". Bulletin of the Natural History Museum of London 53: 11–70. http://biostor.org/reference/110558. 
  37. ↑ 37.0 37.1 Hendrickx, Christophe; Mateus, Octávio; Buffetaut, Eric (6 January 2016). "Morphofunctional Analysis of the Quadrate of Spinosauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) and the Presence of Spinosaurus and a Second Spinosaurine Taxon in the Cenomanian of North Africa.". PLOS ONE 11 (1): e0144695. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144695. PMID 26734729. Bibcode: 2016PLoSO..1144695H. 
  38. ↑ Bertin, Tor (2010). "A Catalogue of Material and Review of the Spinosauridae". PalArch's Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology 7 (4): 01–39. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jvp/article/view/457. 
  39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 39.2 Ibrahim, N.; Sereno, P. C.; Dal Sasso, C.; Maganuco, S.; Fabbri, M.; Martill, D. M.; Zouhri, S.; Myhrvold, N. et al. (2014). "Semiaquatic adaptations in a giant predatory dinosaur". Science 345 (6204): 1613–1616. doi:10.1126/science.1258750. PMID 25213375. Bibcode: 2014Sci...345.1613I. https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/semiaquatic-adaptations-in-a-giant-predatory-dinosaur(8f11a1ce-3265-4b3b-8c81-6f576856a87f).html. 
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 40.2 40.3 Allain, R.; Xaisanavong, T.; Richir, P.; Khentavong, B. (2012). "The first definitive Asian spinosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the early cretaceous of Laos". Naturwissenschaften 99 (5): 369–377. doi:10.1007/s00114-012-0911-7. PMID 22528021. Bibcode: 2012NW.....99..369A. 
  41. ↑ Eddy, DR; Clarke, JA (2011). "New Information on the Cranial Anatomy of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis and Its Implications for the Phylogeny of Allosauroidea (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". PLOS ONE 6 (3): e17932. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017932. PMID 21445312. Bibcode: 2011PLoSO...617932E. 
  42. ↑ Hecht, Jeff. 1998. “Fish Swam in Fear.” New Scientist. November 21. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16021610-300-fish-swam-in-fear/.
  43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 Elisabete Malafaia; José Miguel Gasulla; Fernando Escaso; Iván Narváez; José Luis Sanz; Francisco Ortega (2019). "A new spinosaurid theropod (Dinosauria: Megalosauroidea) from the late Barremian of Vallibona, Spain: Implications for spinosaurid diversity in the Early Cretaceous of the Iberian Peninsula". Cretaceous Research. in press: 104221. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2019.104221.
  44. ↑ O Estado de S. Paulo (in Portuguese), 2009-05-14, available at [1]; O Globo, 2009-05-15, abridgement available at [2]; university's announcement at Moutinho, Sofia (2009-11-05). "Inaugura dia 14 a exposição Dinossauros no Sertão". http://www.ufrj.br/detalha_noticia.php?codnoticia=7486. 
  45. ↑ Machado, E. B.; Kellner, A. W. A.; Campos, D. A. (2005). "Preliminary information on a dinosaur (Theropoda, Spinosauridae) pelvis from the Cretaceous Santana Formation (Romualdo Member) Brazil". Congresso Latino-Americano de Paleontologia de Vertebrados 2 (Boletim de resumos): 161–162. 
  46. ↑ Ibrahim, Nizar; Maganuco, Simone; Dal Sasso, Cristiano; Fabbri, Matteo; Auditore, Marco; Bindellini, Gabriele; Martill, David M.; Zouhri, Samir et al. (7 May 2020). "Tail-propelled aquatic locomotion in a theropod dinosaur". Nature 581 (7806): 67–70. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2190-3. PMID 32376955. Bibcode: 2020Natur.581...67I. 
  47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 47.2 47.3 Rayfield, E.J (2011). "Structural performance of tetanuran theropod skulls, with emphasis on the Megalosauridae, Spinosauridae and Carcharodontosauridae". Special Papers in Palaeontology 86: 241–254. OCLC 769169643. 
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 48.2 48.3 48.4 48.5 Buffetaut, Eric; Ouaja, Mohamed (1 September 2002). "A new specimen of Spinosaurus (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Tunisia, with remarks on the evolutionary history of the Spinosauridae". Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 173 (5): 415–421. doi:10.2113/173.5.415. http://doc.rero.ch/record/14728/files/PAL_E1854.pdf. 
  49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 Barrett, Paul M.; Benson, Roger B. J.; Rich, Thomas H.; Vickers-Rich, Patricia (23 December 2011). "First spinosaurid dinosaur from Australia and the cosmopolitanism of Cretaceous dinosaur faunas". Biology Letters 7 (6): 933–936. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0466. PMID 21693488. 
  50. ↑ 50.0 50.1 Mateus, Octávio; Estraviz-López, Darío (16 February 2022). "A new theropod dinosaur from the early cretaceous (Barremian) of Cabo Espichel, Portugal: Implications for spinosaurid evolution". PLOS ONE 17 (2): e0262614. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262614. PMID 35171930. Bibcode: 2022PLoSO..1762614M. 
  51. ↑ 51.0 51.1 Serrano-Martínez, A.; Vidal, D.; Sciscio, L.; Ortega, F.; Knoll, F. (2015). "Isolated theropod teeth from the Middle Jurassic of Niger and the early dental evolution of Spinosauridae". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. doi:10.4202/app.00101.2014. 
  52. ↑ 52.0 52.1 Holtz Jr., T. R. (1998). "Spinosaurs as crocodile mimics". Science 282 (5392): 1276–1277. doi:10.1126/science.282.5392.1276. 
  53. ↑ 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 Sereno, P.C.; Beck, A.L.; Dutheil, D.B.; Gado, B.; Larsson, H.C.E.; Lyon, G.H.; Marcot, J.D.; Rauhut, O.W.M. et al. (1998). "A long-snouted predatory dinosaur from Africa and the evolution of spinosaurids". Science 282 (5392): 1298–1302. doi:10.1126/science.282.5392.1298. PMID 9812890. Bibcode: 1998Sci...282.1298S. 
  54. ↑ Buffetaut, E.; Ouaja, M. (2002). "A new specimen of Spinosaurus (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Tunisia, with remarks on the evolutionary history of the Spinosauridae". Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 173 (5): 415–421. doi:10.2113/173.5.415. http://doc.rero.ch/record/14728/files/PAL_E1854.pdf. 
  55. ↑ Milner, A. C. (2003). "Fish-eating theropods: A short review of the systematics, biology and palaeobiogeography of spinosaurs". Actas de las II Jornadas Internacionales Sobre Paleontologýa de Dinosaurios y Su Entorno: 129–138. 
  56. ↑ Buffetaut, E. (2007). "The spinosaurid dinosaur Baryonyx (Saurischia, Theropoda) in the Early Cretaceous of Portugal". Geological Magazine 144 (6): 1021–1025. doi:10.1017/S0016756807003883. Bibcode: 2007GeoM..144.1021B. http://doc.rero.ch/record/13845/files/PAL_E769.pdf. 
  57. ↑ 57.0 57.1 57.2 Mateus, O.; Araújo, R.; Natário, C.; Castanhinha, R. (2011). "A new specimen of the theropod dinosaur Baryonyx from the early Cretaceous of Portugal and taxonomic validity of Suchosaurus". Zootaxa. 2827 2827: 54–68. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2827.1.3. http://docentes.fct.unl.pt/sites/default/files/omateus/files/mateus_et_al_2011_a_new_specimen_of_the_theropod_dinosaur_baryonyx_from_the_early_cretaceous_of_portugal_and_taxonomic_validity_of_suchosaurus.pdf. 
  58. ↑ Hendrickx, Christophe; Mateus, O.; Araújo, R.; Choiniere, J. (2019). "The distribution of dental features in non-avian theropod dinosaurs: Taxonomic potential, degree of homoplasy, and major evolutionary trends". Palaeontologia Electronica 22 (3): 1–110. doi:10.26879/820. ISSN 1094-8074. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2019/2806-dental-features-in-theropods. 
  59. ↑ Soto, M.; Toriño, P.; Perea, D. (2020). "Ceratosaurus (Theropoda, Ceratosauria) teeth from the Tacuarembó Formation (Late Jurassic, Uruguay)". Journal of South American Earth Sciences 103: 102781. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102781. ISSN 0895-9811. Bibcode: 2020JSAES.10302781S. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JSAES.10302781S. 
  60. ↑ Candeiro, C. R. A.; Brusatte, S. L.; Souza, A. L. (2017). "Spinosaurid Dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous of North Africa and Europe: Fossil Record, Biogeography and Extinction". Anuário do Instituto de Geociências 40 (3): 294–302. doi:10.11137/2017_3_294_302. 
  61. ↑ Malafaia, E.; Gasulla, J. M.; Escaso, F.; Narvaéz, I.; Ortega, F. (2020). "An update of the spinosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) fossil record from the Lower Cretaceous of the Iberian Peninsula: distribution, diversity, and evolutionary history". Journal of Iberian Geology 46 (4): 431–444. doi:10.1007/s41513-020-00138-9. 
  62. ↑ Barker, C. T.; Hone, D. W. E.; Naish, D.; Cau, A.; Lockwood, J. A. F.; Foster, B.; Clarkin, C. E.; Schneider, P. et al. (2021). "New spinosaurids from the Wessex Formation (Early Cretaceous, UK) and the European origins of Spinosauridae". Scientific Reports 11 (1): 19340. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97870-8. PMID 34588472. Bibcode: 2021NatSR..1119340B. 
  63. ↑ 63.0 63.1 63.2 Sues, Hans-Dieter; Frey, Eberhard; Martill, David M.; Scott, Diane M. (19 September 2002). "Irritator challengeri , a spinosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22 (3): 535–547. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2002)022[0535:ICASDT2.0.CO;2]. 
  64. ↑ Vullo, Romain; Allain, Ronan; Cavin, Lionel (2016). "Convergent evolution of jaws between spinosaurid dinosaurs and pike conger eels". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61. doi:10.4202/app.00284.2016. 
  65. ↑ Cuff, Andrew R.; Rayfield, Emily J. (28 May 2013). "Feeding Mechanics in Spinosaurid Theropods and Extant Crocodilians". PLOS ONE 8 (5): e65295. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065295. PMID 23724135. Bibcode: 2013PLoSO...865295C. 
  66. ↑ Witton, Mark P. (2018). "Pterosaurs in Mesozoic food webs: a review of fossil evidence". Geological Society, London, Special Publications 455 (1): 7–23. doi:10.1144/SP455.3. Bibcode: 2018GSLSP.455....7W. 
  67. ↑ 67.0 67.1 Buffetaut, Eric; Martill, David; Escuillié, François (July 2004). "Pterosaurs as part of a spinosaur diet". Nature 430 (6995): 33. doi:10.1038/430033a. PMID 15229562. Bibcode: 2004Natur.429...33B. 
  68. ↑ Buffetaut, Eric; Suteethorn, Varavudh (June 1999). "The dinosaur fauna of the Sao Khua Formation of Thailand and the beginning of the Cretaceous radiation of dinosaurs in Asia". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 150 (1–2): 13–23. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(99)00004-8. Bibcode: 1999PPP...150...13B. http://doc.rero.ch/record/14471/files/PAL_E1664.pdf. 
  69. ↑ Hendrickx, C.; Mateus, O.; Buffetaut, E. (2016). "Morphofunctional Analysis of the Quadrate of Spinosauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) and the Presence of Spinosaurus and a Second Spinosaurine Taxon in the Cenomanian of North Africa". PLOS ONE 11 (1): e0144695. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144695. PMID 26734729. Bibcode: 2016PLoSO..1144695H. 
  70. ↑ Hassler, A.; Martin, J. E.; Amiot, R.; Tacail, T.; Godet, F. Arnaud; Allain, R.; Balter, V. (11 April 2018). "Calcium isotopes offer clues on resource partitioning among Cretaceous predatory dinosaurs". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285 (1876): 20180197. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0197. PMID 29643213. 
  71. ↑ Charig, A. J.; Milner, A. C. (1986). "Baryonyx, a remarkable new theropod dinosaur". Nature 324 (6095): 359–361. doi:10.1038/324359a0. PMID 3785404. Bibcode: 1986Natur.324..359C. 
  72. ↑ Kitchener, Andrew (January 1987). "Function of Claws' claws". Nature 325 (6100): 114. doi:10.1038/325114a0. Bibcode: 1987Natur.325..114K. 
  73. ↑ Therrien, F.; Henderson, D.; Ruff, C. (2005). "Bite me – biomechanical models of theropod mandibles and implications for feeding behavior". in Carpenter, K.. The Carnivorous Dinosaurs. Indiana University Press. pp. 179–230. ISBN 978-0-253-34539-4. 
  74. ↑ 74.0 74.1 Carpenter, Kenneth (2005). The Carnivorous Dinosaurs. Indiana University Press. pp. 285–291. ISBN 9780253345394. 
  75. ↑ Halstead, L.B. (1975). The Evolution and Ecology of the Dinosaurs. London: Eurobook Limited. pp. 1–116. ISBN 978-0-85654-018-9. 
  76. ↑ Gimsa, Jan; Sleigh, Robert; Gimsa, Ulrike (May 2016). "The riddle of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus' dorsal sail". Geological Magazine 153 (3): 544–547. doi:10.1017/S0016756815000801. Bibcode: 2016GeoM..153..544G. https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6402283/data. 
  77. ↑ Bailey, J.B. (1997). "Neural spine elongation in dinosaurs: sailbacks or buffalo-backs?". Journal of Paleontology 71 (6): 1124–1146. doi:10.1017/S0022336000036076. Bibcode: 1997JPal...71.1124B. 
  78. ↑ 78.0 78.1 78.2 Stromer, E. (1915). "Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers in den Wüsten Ägyptens. II. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharije-Stufe (unterstes Cenoman). 3. Das Original des Theropoden Spinosaurus aegyptiacus nov. gen., nov. spec" (in de). Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse 28 (3): 1–32. http://www.megaupload.com/?d=3KCCC7LS. [yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  79. ↑ Allain, Ronan; Xaisanavong, Tiengkham; Richir, Philippe; Khentavong, Bounsou (2012). "The first definitive Asian spinosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the early cretaceous of Laos". Naturwissenschaften 99 (5): 369–377. doi:10.1007/s00114-012-0911-7. PMID 22528021. Bibcode: 2012NW.....99..369A. 
  80. ↑ Naish, Darren (2013). "Dinosaurs and their exaggerated structures : species recognition aids, or sexual display devices?" (in en). https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/species-recognition-vs-sexual-selection-in-dinosaurs/. 
  81. ↑ Gimsa, J.; Sleigh, R.; Gimsa, U. (2015). "The riddle of Spinosaurus aegyptiacus dorsal sail". Geological Magazine 153 (3): 544–547. doi:10.1017/S0016756815000801. Bibcode: 2016GeoM..153..544G. 
  82. ↑ Bailey, J. B. (2015). "Neural spine elongation in dinosaurs: sailbacks or buffalo-backs?". Journal of Paleontology 71 (6): 1124–1146. doi:10.1017/S0022336000036076. Bibcode: 1997JPal...71.1124B. 
  83. ↑ "The smallest biggest theropod dinosaur: A new fossil from Africa represents a small juvenile individual of the huge sail-backed Spinosaurus" (Press release). PeerJ. 30 May 2018.
  84. ↑ Anderson, Natali (31 May 2018). "Paleontologists Find Fossil of Smallest Spinosaurus". Sci-News.com. http://www.sci-news.com/paleontology/smallest-spinosaurus-06052.html. 
  85. ↑ 85.0 85.1 Amiot, R.; Buffetaut, E.; Lécuyer, C.; Wang, X.; Boudad, L.; Ding, Z.; Fourel, F.; Hutt, S. et al. (2010). "Oxygen isotope evidence for semi-aquatic habits among spinosaurid theropods". Geology 38 (2): 139–142. doi:10.1130/G30402.1. Bibcode: 2010Geo....38..139A. 
  86. ↑ Beevor, Thomas; Quigley, Aaron; Smith, Roy E.; Smyth, Robert S.H.; Ibrahim, Nizar; Zouhri, Samir; Martill, David M. (January 2021). "Taphonomic evidence supports an aquatic lifestyle for Spinosaurus". Cretaceous Research 117: 104627. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104627. Bibcode: 2021CrRes.11704627B. https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/taphonomic-evidence-supports-an-aquatic-lifestyle-for-spinosaurus(e7fb2358-2ac6-4b6c-9697-225a525e8366).html. 
  87. ↑ Myhrvold, Nathan P.; Sereno, Paul C.; Baumgart, Stephanie L.; Vidal, Daniel; Fish, Frank E.; Henderson, Donald M.; Saitta, Evan T. (2023). Diving dinosaurs? Caveats on the use of bone compactness and pFDA for inferring lifestyle. doi:10.1101/2023.05.04.539484. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.04.539484v1.full.pdf. 
  88. ↑ Henderson, D. M. (2018). "A buoyancy, balance and stability challenge to the hypothesis of a semi-aquatic Spinosaurus Stromer, 1915 (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". PeerJ 6: e5409. doi:10.7717/peerj.5409. PMID 30128195. 
  89. ↑ Taquet, Philippe; Russell, Dale A. (September 1998). "New data on spinosaurid dinosaurs from the early cretaceous of the Sahara". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series IIA - Earth and Planetary Science 327 (5): 347–353. doi:10.1016/S1251-8050(98)80054-2. Bibcode: 1998CRASE.327..347T. 
  90. ↑ Samathi, Adun; Sander, P. Martin; Chanthasit, Phornphen (2 December 2021). "A spinosaurid from Thailand (Sao Khua Formation, Early Cretaceous) and a reassessment of Camarillasaurus cirugedae from the Early Cretaceous of Spain". Historical Biology 33 (12): 3480–3494. doi:10.1080/08912963.2021.1874372. 
  91. ↑ Salgado, Leonardo; Canudo, José I.; Garrido, Alberto C.; Ruiz-Omeñaca, José I.; García, Rodolfo A.; de la Fuente, Marcelo S.; Barco, José L.; Bollati, Raúl (June 2009). "Upper Cretaceous vertebrates from El Anfiteatro area, Río Negro, Patagonia, Argentina". Cretaceous Research 30 (3): 767–784. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2009.01.001. Bibcode: 2009CrRes..30..767S. 
  92. ↑ Hasegawa, Yoshikazu; Tanaka, Gengo; Takakuwa, Yuji; Koike, Satoshi (2010). "Fine sculptures on a tooth of Spinosaurus (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from Morocco". Bulletin of Gunma Museum of Natural History. 14. pp. 11–20. http://www.gmnh.pref.gunma.jp/wp-content/uploads/bulletin14_2.pdf. 
  93. ↑ ResearchSEA (2014). "First discovery of dinosaur fossils in Malaysia". https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140224204737.htm. 
  94. ↑ Alonso, Antonio; Canudo, José Ignacio (17 August 2016). "On the spinosaurid theropod teeth from the early Barremian (Early Cretaceous) Blesa Formation (Spain)". Historical Biology 28 (6): 823–834. doi:10.1080/08912963.2015.1036751. 
  95. ↑ "Australian 'Spinosaur' unearthed" (in en). Australian Geographic. http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2011/06/australian-spinosaur-unearthed. 
  96. ↑ Poropat, Stephen F.; White, Matt A.; Vickers-Rich, Patricia; Rich, Thomas H. (2019). "New megaraptorid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) remains from the Lower Cretaceous Eumeralla Formation of Cape Otway, Victoria, Australia". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 39 (4): e1666273. doi:10.1080/02724634.2019.1666273. Bibcode: 2019JVPal..39E6273P. https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/9963197. 

External links

Wikidata ☰ Q131199 entry



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Spinosauridae&oldid=3490360"