Earth:Úrkút Manganese Ore Formation
| Úrkút Manganese Ore Formation Stratigraphic range: Toarcian ~182 Ma [1] | |
|---|---|
 Ancient karst formation in an abandoned manganite quarry in Úrkút | |
| Type | Geological formation |
| Unit of | Úrkút Basin |
| Underlies | Épleny Limestone Formation |
| Overlies | Isztimér Formation |
| Thickness | 15 m (49 ft) |
| Lithology | |
| Primary | Manganese |
| Other | Rhodochrosite |
| Location | |
| Region | Central Mountains of Transdanubia |
| Country |  Hungary |
| Extent | ~12 km (7.5 mi) by 4–6 km (2.5–3.7 mi) |
| Type section | |
| Named for | Úrkút |
| Named by | Drubina-Szabo[2] |
| Year defined | 1959 |
  Úrkút Manganese Ore Formation (Hungary) | |
The Úrkút Manganese Ore Formation is a Jurassic geologic formation in Hungary. It covers the Early Toarcian stage of the Early Jurassic, and it is one of the main regional units linked to the Toarcian Anoxic Events.[3][4] Different fossils heve been recovered on the locations, including marine life such as Ammonites[5] Fish[6] and terrestrial fossils, such as Palynomorphs[7] and fossil wood.[8] Úrkút (17´38'E and 47´05'N) and Eplény (17´55'E and 47´12'N) are the main deposits of the Formation.[2] Are related to the Bakony Range, an ancient massif that was uplifted gradually and exposed to a long period of erosion, where the deposits of Úrkút appear to be a basin inclined gently to the north, while the highest point to the south is the basalt mass of Kab Mountain. Eplény region consists of a broad N-S trending open valley between fiat-topped, small hills.[2]
Geology
The Urkut Area is part of the Bakony Tectonic Block, with the abundant presence of faults dividing the region into several segments.[2] The terrain where the Manganese Ore is developed is characterised by a high fracturation, where the Jurassic beds and shale lent themselves readily to deformation, with minor folds, faults and shear zones.[9] During the geological evolution of the Bakony range a series of principal fractures were active repeatedly, yielding to vertical as well as horizontal forces that ultimately produced the structural make-up controlling the present topographic configuration of the area.[9] The Jurassic sediments, along the other Mesozoic aged strata were deposited in a branch of a Geosyncline, connected with the Alpine coeval biota.[2] On the Triassic-Jurassic boundary Kimmerian movements take place, as evidenced by the change observed on the texture of the local Calcareous sediments, interpreted as a gradual rising of the sea bottom.[9] To the end of the Lower Jurassic, on the Toarcian, there are several records of another series of pulses from Kimmerian movements, that resulted in partial emergence, which dates the beginning of Karst development on the Csirda Mountain. However, marine sedimentation continued over most of the region and the sea became more widespread.[2] On this time a global sea transgression occur, where on the Úrkút basin shallow-water sediments accumulated near the margins, and with progressive deepening of the sea bottom until the end of late Liassic time, sediments of correspondingly deeper water were deposited.[2] Due to a cut-off of water circulation there were a series of changes on the local development of the basin, which led to the accumulation of the manganese minerals.[2]
The Éplény Area shows a structure and geological development with minor differences from those of Úrkút, being considered overall identical. However, it suffered minor deformation during the late Kimmerian movements, and instead of the Austrian movements, the Subhercynian and Laramide movements produced important structures. After the Pyrenean and Savian movements, the Éplény area started to sink slowly and to receive marine sediments, emerging later on the Middle Miocene.[2] The manganese ore group of beds appears in an absolutely different way according to evolution in Eplény, where while in Úrkút 4 beds can be divided, in Eplény, the 3 beds appear usually with sharp boundary, in reduced thickness.[10]
Stratigraphy
.jpg)
The oldest formations on the Úrkút basin are referred to the Upper Triassic Dolomite range and the Dachstein Limestone of Raetian age. After the deposition of the Triassic rocks a series of Jurassic strata successions have overlain the older deposits, with its lowermost contact found on the uppermost strata of the own Dachstein Limestone, developing a lower Liassic sequence that is a white, yellowish-gray or pink, dense Limestone resembling that of the Dachstein.[2] Over it, there is a series of younger liassic strata and a Crinoid-Brachiopod and Rhynchonellatan bearing reddish Limestone, that resembles the Sinemurian Hierlatz Limestone of the Csárda Mountain, that is the last unit under the coeval Manganese deposits from there.[11] Late Pliensbachian strata is composed by nodular and cherty red limestone with abundant ammonites and brachiopods, that belong to the Isztimér Formation.[12] On the uppermost Pliensbachian strata there is a series of beds that consists of greenish-gray limestone and marl, which also contain crinoids and brachiopods, being the last unit under the Manganese Ore.[2] The Upper Liassic (Toarcian) sequence is composed mostly by the Úrkút Manganese and the Éplény Limestone (Late Toarcian-Aalenian), and starts with thick-bedded, gray, Radiolaria-bearing, argillaceous marl containing several intercalations of manganese carbonate, or rarely, manganese oxides, with the top of the sequence being a brown to purple nodular Limestone with light green spots.[2] Middle Jurassic overlaying these deposits, being mostly a series of cherty Marlstone containing the genus Posidonomya and several types of Radiolaria.[11] The Late Jurassic strata is vanished locally, with the Cretaceous sedimentation starting with several continental beds with Bauxite and accompanying Laterites.[2] Finally, on the Tertiary, the Lower Eocene continental clay and bauxite are overlain by gray carbonaceous clay and sandstone, with the and[clarification needed] Jurassic beds and manganiferous beds eroded.[2]
Lithology
The Manganese Ore is the main component of the formation, and its distinctive characteristic element.[13] The Úrkút Manganese ores occur on marine sedimentary rocks composed mainly of bioclastic Limestone, radiolarian Clay Marlstone, and dark-gray to Black Shale.[14] The Origin of the Local Manganese Ores based on the presence of siliceous manganese ores and antauthigenic Silica points to the volcanogenic-sedimentary origin of this Mn-ore deposits[15] Manganese nodules are widely distributed in the area in Jurassic rocks, mainly on the Lower Jurassic, but younger nodules also occur.[13] The Black Shale with Mn-carbonate get its maximum deposition on the Toarcian, concretely during the Tenuicostatum–Falciferum Ammonite zones in the coeval Sachrang Formation, Strubberg Formation and Allgäu Formation in the Northern Calcareous Alps and the Eastern Alps (Austria, Germany and Switzerland), while Úrkút and related deposits were the regional equivalent in the Transdanubian Range.[13] There are other deposits with Shale and associated Mn particles on contemporaneous oxic deposits occur that formed under similar environmental conditions.[16] The Úrkút Manganese deposit has been investigated geologically, mineralogically and chemically.[17] It has several properties, including very fine grain size (~ 1 μm), an enrichment of metals over a geologically very short time (-500 thousand years).[17] Both Metals and the Manganese have been related with local hydrothermal vent systems, where the metal enrichment was a result of microbial activity.[18] There are at least three types of Manganese deposits that occur close in proximity. The first, those with cherty Fe–Mn-oxide ore, developed on the margins of the much larger carbonate ore body, whose origin has been related with proximal fracture systems, being composed by varicolored metalliferous Claystone.[19] Other type includes the so-called Csárda-hill, where it is very cherty and iron-rich, and is suggested as originated from a low-temperature fluid flow along an associated fracture zone.[20] This deposit is associated with sedimentary dykes, filled with red Lime-Mudstone, varicoloured Claystone, carbonate debris, or Mn oxides.[20] The last type is the Black Shale-hosted Mn-carbonate, considered a distal ore-forming environment, where the Mn-carbonate proto-ore sediment accumulated.[20] A hydrothermal/exhalative source of metals may have contributed to the formation of the deposits of Black Shale.[21]
This Black Shale level is composed at the base with greenish, organic-rich, pyritiferous clayey marlstone, with several enrichments such as sulfides and barite.[14] Pyrite concretions and thin layers of phosphate and chert are found in the Shale and the lower Limestone.[22] Phosphorus is present as Calciumphosphate, where the latter may be present not only as the component of the local apatite, and related with the P2Os content changes.[22] Although the mean P content of the manganese oxide ore deposits of Eplény and Úrkút is generally less than 1,00 %, being mostly hydroxy-carbonate-Apatite, with some samples more similar to Francolite, while on the Eplény manganese ore deposit is found Dahllite.[23]
There is a rhodochrosite ore, composed of laminated gray, green, brown, and black sections, and is associated with a diagenetic origin.[24] Rhodochrosite concretions with fish and plant fossils are common on the strata, composed by Mn-bearing Calcite with traces of hydroxyl-apatite, kutnohorite, smectite, quartz, feldspar, barite, pyrite, and quartz-cristobalite.[24] Mineralized sections do not contain fossils or traces of benthic fauna, and contain only rarely fish remnants, planktonic organisms as well as silicified, manganized, or coalified plant fragments.[25]
Celadonite and smectite, especially the first, had particular importance for understanding the genesis of the Úrkút manganese ore.[26] Celadonite and nontronite indicate paleo-oxygen level variations in the environment. There are well-crystallised celadonite occurrences that was formed by primary precipitation, differing from the known celadonite occurrences in that it is not found in direct association with submarine basic volcanic rocks, although being any evidence for volcanic contribution to the local ore genesis.[27] The Smectite is also found on the lower Pliensbachian Limestone. Nearly every Sample on Úrkút contains interstratified Illite/smectite.[28]
Local silica is related with the quartz crystallinity of the white tripoli, where based on the dissolution of the carbonate portion of the siliceous Isztimér Limestone Quartz was formed by low-temperature, diagenetic processes.[29] Finally, there were found a series of rare earth elements on the ore, adsorption from sea water, but terrigenous source also displaying a positive Ce anomaly is involved.[30]
The Rn220 and Rn222 concentration in the Úrkút Manganese Formation is anomalously high, and it causes health risk for the attendants of the Úrkút Manganese Mine, which is considered to be related to active fossil Biomat (bacterial action) which leads local minerals to adsorb different atoms or ions, whether they are radiogenic or not.[31]
Paleoenvironment
Black Shale is present worldwide in the lower Toarcian, linked to the anoxic events that took place, in Úrkút locally related with deposits of Manganese Ore.[32] Being part of the Transdanubian Range, the Úrkút Manganese Ore was linked to the environmental evolution of the southern passive margin of the rifting Tethys Ocean.[9] After Hettangian drowning and Sinemurian-Pliensbachian extensional tectonics and subsidence, along with pelagic sedimentation and submarine topography, a pronounced horst developed over the local sea, with a depth on the Pliensbachian-Toarcian Basin of 600 m.[33] The environment of the Formation was linked to 2 settings: a series o pelagic basind, including the Zala Basin and the own Úrkút and Eplieny Basins, related to open marine conditions where bioturbation is scarce, but there is a great amount of planktonic organisms, associated with a suboxic to anoxic conditions.[32] Radiolarians, sponge spicules, crinoid ossicles, bivalves, gastropods, ammonites and fish were recovered as the main local biota, deposited on a 20–40 m basinal ore sequence.[32] The Other deposits come from the near emerged lands, that include the Gerecse Hills, Vértes Hills and the Bakony Hills, whose biota has been recovered on the formation by palynological analysis and fossil wood.[34]
More recent studies support the lack of any igneous event during Pliensbachian and Toarcian times in the Úrkút Basin.[28] The Smectite formation lacks igneous rocks, tuffs, or volcanic glasses.[28] Although, it can be due to changes in the fluctuation on the basin.[28] Observed Mn veins and their above-proposed formation mechanism do not eliminate the possibility of tectonically formed Neptunian dikes elsewhere in the basin, which could well fit in the local, general tectonic environment observed, for instance in Eplény.[35]
In this setting volcanism was the main local event, where eroded near basaltic sequences provided a metallic source for the ore, being channeled by suboxic waters to the Úrkút Basin.[32] The local tectonic activity created fractures and deep faults and there was a development of endogenic thermal effects, such as degassing and the release of solutions, along with the mixing of syngenetic ash falls that deposited Fe into the carbonate rocks.[36] The fine Volcanic material was altered on the Marine sediments. The local hydrothermal emanations in the deep fault zones, where bacterial activity caused the precipitation of large amounts of metal ions in the form of very fine-grained oxyhydroxides. Meanwhile, the accumulation of dead bacteria created a mass of very reactive organic matter. Under aerobic conditions, the action of the microbial oxidation led to the local accumulation of Mn oxides that ended being Ca-rhodochrosite, and supported Celadonite formation by mixing of geological fluids with seawater. It has been calculated 563 years for the duration of ore local formation based on an estimated 3 weeks for a microbial population growth cycle.[37]
The local manganese ore is, in reality, a Mn-ore series of stromatolite with a volcanic tuff component, that was later transformed by diagenetic processes.[36] The modern analog of this environment of the Úrkút Manganese Ore basinal deposits would be flourishing Prokaryotic bacteria colonies located in submarine vent systems, normally related with remnants of proto-rifts or failed rift systems on continental crust in a submarine environment. The local environments are interpreted as hydrothermal vent systems of cooler temperatures.[36]
Fossils
Bivalves
| Bivalvia | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Material | Location | Notes | Images |
|
|
Úrkút quarry. |
A Clam, type member of the family Solemyidae inside Solemyida. Benthic fauna found in the black slate. |
| |
|
Pseudomytiloides[38] |
|
|
Úrkút quarry. |
A Clam, member of the family Inoceramidae inside Myalinida. Mistaken for other related genera on the deposit, it is among the most abundant local clams. Found associated with large Fe deposition. |
|
.jpg)
Brachiopoda
The dominant group are the Terebratulids, while Strophomenids play a significant role.[39] While the Brachiopods and Gastropods are more abundant on the underlying Hiertlaz Formation, but also continuous on the Úrkút and Épleny quarries.[39] In the very rich fauna of the local seamount slope the orders Terebratulida and Rhynchonellida play an equally important role, but the basin areas are characterized by a low-diversity fauna dominated by large terebratulids.[39]
| Brachiopoda | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Material | Location | Notes | Images |
|
Linguithyris[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Nucleatidae inside Terebratulida. Benthic fauna found in the black slate. |
|
|
Zeilleria[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, type member of the family Zeilleriidae inside Terebratulida. Relatively abundant on slope depostits, Z. aqulina represents incomplete specimens whose identification is rather complex. |
|
|
Bakonyithyris[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Zeilleriidae inside Terebratulida. A regional genus, limited mostly to the Bakony mountains and linked with Fe deposition. |
|
|
Eplenyithyris[40] |
|
|
|
A rhynchonellatan, incertae sedis inside Terebratulida. It was first identified on the Épleny quarry |
|
|
Viallithyris[40] |
|
|
|
A rhynchonellatan, incertae sedis inside Terebratulida. Rather less abundant than other genera, but based on more complete specimens. Is linked with Italian fossils of the same age. |
|
|
Rhapidothyris[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Lobothyrididae inside Terebratulida. Based on fragmentary specimens |
|
|
Securithyris[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Pygopidae inside Terebratulida. A more basinal genus |
|
|
Liospiriferina[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Spiriferinidae inside Spiriferinida. Abundant on the slope deposits, but rather rare on the basinal settings |
|
|
Cisnerospira[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Mentzeliidae inside Spiriferinida. Rather rare |
|
|
Gibbirhynchia[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Tetrarhynchiidae inside Rhynchonellida. A genus common on the Sinemurian-Toarcian of the Mediterranean rela, but on this deposits is based on incomplete specimens. |
|
|
Jakubirhynchia[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Basiliolidae inside Rhynchonellida. Is based on very fragmentary remains. |
|
|
Apringia[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Basiliolidae inside Rhynchonellida. Diverse, but only on slope deposits. |
|
|
Prionorhynchia[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, type member of the family Prionorhynchiidae inside Rhynchonellida. Rare and based on very fragmentary specimens |
|
|
Lokutella[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Prionorhynchiidae inside Rhynchonellida. Diverse, but not abundant. |
|
|
Nannirhynchia[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Norellidae inside Rhynchonellida. A small genus |
|
|
Pisirhynchia[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Norellidae inside Rhynchonellida. Abundant, related with Silica deposits. |
|
|
Kericserella[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Norellidae inside Rhynchonellida. Abundant, related with Silica deposits. |
|
|
Fenyveskutella[40] |
|
|
|
A Rhynchonellatan, member of the family Norellidae inside Rhynchonellida. Abundant, linked with basinal deposits |
|
Gastropoda
| Gastropoda | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Material | Location | Notes | Images |
|
Dohmella[41] |
|
|
|
A Sea Snail, member of the family Oriostomatidae inside Euomphalina. Was identified originally as "Riselloidea cf. multistriata" |
|
|
|
|
A Sea Snail, member of the family Murchisoniina inside Lophospiridae. It was first identified on the Bakony Mountains |
||
|
Sisenna[41] |
|
|
|
A Sea Snail, member of the family Pleurotomarioidea inside Pleurotomariidae. The most diverse local Pleurotomarid, is also linked with large microbial accumulations. |
|
|
Laevitomaria[41] |
|
|
|
A Sea Snail, member of the family Pleurotomarioidea inside Pleurotomariidae. Abundant on deposits with Terrigenous inputs |
|
|
|
|
A Sea Snail, member of the family Discohelicidae inside Vetigastropoda. Abundant on deposits with Terrigenous inputs |
| |
|
Amberleya[41] |
|
|
|
A Sea Snail, member of the family Eucyclidae inside Seguenzioidea. Abundant on deposits with Terrigenous inputs |
|
|
Austriacopsis[41] |
|
|
|
A Sea Snail, member of the family Fissurellidae inside Fissurelloidea. Related with Snails found in coeval deposits in Austria. |
|
|
Anticonulus[42] |
|
|
|
A Top Snail, member of the family Trochidae inside Trochoidea. Is found associated with Crinoid debris |
|
|
Lewisiella[42] |
|
|
|
A Sea Snail, member of the family Ataphridae inside Trochoidea. Is found associated with Crinoid debris |
|
|
Proconulus[42] |
|
|
|
A Sea Snail, member of the family Proconulidae inside Trochoidea. Is found associated with Crinoid debris |
|
Cephalopoda
| Cephalopoda | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Material | Location | Notes | Images |
|
|
|
An Ammonite, member of the family Phylloceratidae inside Phylloceratida. Was the main identified ammonite locally on Úrkút, and is related to great concentrations of Fe. |
| |
|
|
|
An Ammonite, member of the family Phylloceratidae inside Phylloceratida. It is based on more complete specimens than other local Ammonites. |
||
|
|
|
An Ammonite, member of the family Hildoceratidae inside Ammonitida. The most abundant, linked with specimens from north Italy. |
| |
|
|
|
An Ammonite, member of the family Hildoceratidae inside Ammonitida. The most diverse, related with specimens from Germany and Austria, but also north Italy. |
| |
|
|
|
An Ammonite, type member of the family Dactylioceratidae inside Ammonitida. Related with specimens from Germany and Austria. |
| |
|
|
|
An Ammonite, type member of the family Lytoceratidae inside Ammonitida. Related with specimens from Germany and Austria. |
| |
|
|
|
A Nautilidan, type member of the family Cenoceratidae. A well distributed genus between the Sinemurian-Toarcian, found on Germany, England, Austria, Italy, etc. |
| |
Actinopterygii
| Actinopterygii | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Material | Location | Notes | Images |
|
|
|
An Osteichthyes, type member of the family Leptolepididae inside Teleostei. On the fracture surfaces of the Shale, many mica flakes can be observed, along with the enrichment of fossils, including this genus. The Most abundant fish genus recovered locally, probably formed large Schools. Is linked to the Toarcian biota of Germany and England. |
| |
|
|
|
An Osteichthyes, member of the family Pycnodontiformes inside Neopterygii. It is located on the dorsal side, with the skull bones frontal and parietal are strongly intertwined it extends strongly towards the anterior end of the skull. It has an interoperculum larger than any other fish taxon. The posterior scales on the fossil is characterized by the appearance of a 2–3-pronged spike.[6] |
| |
|
|
|
An Osteichthyes, type member of the family Caturidae inside Amiiformes. On the skull the operculum and the praeoperculum are long and close contact. There is a single epidural plate that connects to the dorsal extension of the vertebral body.[6] |
| |
|
|
|
An Osteichthyes, type member of the family Dapediidae inside Holostei. The Dapedium specimen from Úrkút is the first articulated Mesozoic fish body fossil from Hungary that is described in detail.[44] The preserved cranium reveals important characters, although species-level identification is hindered by suboptimal preservation of some diagnostic features.[44] |
| |
Fungi
| Fungi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Material | Location | Notes | Images |
|
Hyphae[45] |
|
|
|
Uncertain types of plant parasite Fungi. It was impossible to identificate the specimens found. Spores located on the manganese ores had hyphal threads. Some fungal remains occurred on disorganized higher plant remains, being probably parasitic or saprophytic vegetations, occurring in direct ratio with the plant rest. |
|
|
Ornatisporites[46] |
|
|
|
Fungal spores of uncertain assignation, probably Ophiostomatales. O. urkutensis is known only from Úrkút and related with Plant spores, probably being a parasitic fungus. |
|
Palynology
| Palynology | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Material | Location | Notes | Images |
|
|
|
An Acritarch, probably related with Chloroplastida. Possible organic matter from green algae. |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Prasinophyceae inside Chloroplastida. Green Algae Cysts, related with oxygenated waters. |
||
|
Pleurozonaria[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Prasinophyceae inside Chloroplastida. Green Algae Cysts, related with oxygenated waters. |
|
|
Tytthodiscus[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Prasinophyceae inside Chloroplastida. Green Algae Cysts, related with oxygenated waters. |
|
|
Hystrichosphaeridium[7] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Goniodomaceae inside Dinophyceae. Green Algae Cysts, related with oxygenated waters. |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Gymnospermophyta inside Gymnospermae. Unclassified Gymnosperm spores |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Gymnospermophyta inside Gymnospermae. Unclassified Gymnosperm spores |
||
|
Exesipollenites[7] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Gymnospermophyta inside Gymnospermae. Unclassified Gymnosperm spores |
|
|
Pityosporites[7] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Gymnospermophyta inside Gymnospermae. Unclassified Gymnosperm spores |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Gymnospermophyta inside Gymnospermae. Unclassified Gymnosperm spores |
||
|
Staplinisporites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the Bryophyta inside Embryophyta. Moss Spores from humid settings. |
|
|
Sphagnumsporites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Sphagnaceae inside Bryophyta. Moss spores from humid settings. |
|
|
Concavisporites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridophyta inside Tracheobionta. Unclassified fern spores |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridophyta inside Tracheobionta. Unclassified fern apores |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridophyta inside Tracheobionta. Unclassified dern apores. P. circulus was identified first on Úrkút. |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridophyta inside Tracheobionta. |
||
|
Triplanosporites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridophyta inside Tracheobionta. Unclassified Fern Spores. |
|
|
Verrucosisporites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridophyta inside Tracheobionta. Unclassified Fern Spores. T. transdanubicus was identified first on Úrkút. |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Filicopsida inside Tracheobionta. Unclassified Fern Spores. T. verrucatus was identified first on Úrkút. |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridopsida inside Tracheobionta. Unclassified Fern Spores |
||
|
Laevigatosporites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridopsida inside Tracheobionta. Unclassified Fern Spores |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridopsida inside Tracheobionta. Unclassified Fern Spores. L. pflugii, L. transdanubicus and L. urkutensis where identified first on Úrkút. |
||
|
Hamulatisporis[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Lycopodiaceae inside Lycophyta. Lycopod Spores, related with low herbaceous flora found associted with humid environments. |
|
|
Lycopodiumsporites[45] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Lycopodiaceae inside Lycophyta. Lycopod Spores, related with low herbaceous flora found associted with humid environments. |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Lycopodiaceae inside Lycophyta. Lycopod Spores, related with low herbaceous flora found associted with humid environments. |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Lycopodiaceae inside Lycophyta. Lycopod Spores, related with low herbaceous flora found associted with humid environments. |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Selaginellaceae inside Lycophyta. Herbaceous fern spores, linked to open humid environments |
||
|
Klukisporites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Schizaeaceae inside Schizaeales. Herbaceous fern spores, linked to open humid environments |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Schizaeaceae inside Schizaeales. Herbaceous fern spores, linked to open humid environments |
||
|
Contignisporites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pteridaceae inside Polypodiopsida. Fern spores related with large colonies on humid settings. |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Matoniaceae inside Gleicheniales. Fern spores related with modern genera that grew forming large colonies in tropical locations. The great diversity suggest this fern grows on sections proximal to the seashore. |
||
|
Marattisporites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Marattiaceae inside Marattiopsida. Fern spores related with modern genera that grew forming large colonies in tropical locations. |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Cyatheales inside Polypodiopsida. Tree Fern spores, related with humid environments. C. minor was first identified on the Úrkút deposits. |
||
|
Caytonipollenites[45] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Caytoniales inside Pteridospermatophyta. Pollen from large arboreal to arbustive ferns, related with tropical settings. |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Umkomasiaceae inside Corystospermaceae. Pollen from large arboreal to arbustive ferns, related with tropical settings. |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Cycadales inside Cycadopsida. Originally identified as pollen from possible early angiosperms, is now classified as comin from Cycas and relative arbustive to arboreal flora. |
||
|
Cycadopites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Cycadales inside Cycadopsida. |
|
|
Bennettitaceaeacuminella[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Bennettitales inside Spermatopsida. Medium to large sized Cycad-like flora pollen. |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Bennettitales inside Spermatopsida. Originally identified as pollen from possible early Angiosperms, is now classified as coming from Bennetitales, that are closely related with the true flowering plants. As its name suggest, M. urkutiensis was first described on Úrkút. |
||
|
Paracirculina[7] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Bennettitales inside Spermatopsida. A Hygrophyte pollen, related with dry lowlands. |
|
|
Ginkgoretectina[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Ginkgoaceae inside Ginkgoopsida. Pollen that resembles the modern Ginko pollen. |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Cheirolepidiaceae inside Coniferales. Coniferous pollen related to dy and hot settings, abundant on the Toarcian Afro-Mediterranean realm. |
||
|
Corollina[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Cheirolepidiaceae inside Coniferales. Coniferous pollen related to dy and hot settings, common along with Classopollis. |
|
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Cheirolepidiaceae inside Coniferales. Coniferous pollen related to dy and hot settings. |
||
|
Parvisaccites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Podocarpaceae inside Coniferales. Associated with Classiopollis on dry environments. |
|
|
Cerebropollenites[46] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pinidae inside Coniferales. Associated with Classiopollis on dry environments. |
|
|
Inaperturopollenites[45] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Pinidae inside Coniferales. Associated with Classiopollis on dry environments. |
|
|
Monocolpopollenites[45] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Magnoliophyta inside Cycadophytanae. Pollen similar of the modern angiosperm pollen. |
|
|
Tricolporopollenites[45] |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Dilleniidae inside Magnoliopsida. Pollen similar of the modern angiosperm pollen. |
|
Fossil Wood
| Wood | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Material | Location | Notes | Images |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Gymnospermophyta, incertae sedis.[52] |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Ginkgoaceae inside Ginkgoopsida. Shows radial pitting is of mixed type, mostly uniseriate, radial pits forming small or long chains; cross-fields are of araucarioid type. It is labelled "Eplény, kovasodott fatörzs" (Eplény, silicificd wood).[52] |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Cheirolepidiaceae inside Coniferales. It was at the first suggested to come from the Cretaceous period.[53] Then was found to be from the Toarcian.[47] The local fossil wood is impregnated in manganese, what can be a further evidence for hydrothermal source for the local metals.[54] The wood of Simplicioxylon hungaricum is widespread on the lias of Europe, from the Hettangian to the Mid-Aalenian.[54] |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Cheirolepidiaceae inside Coniferales.[47] |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Araucariaceae inside Coniferales. Assigned to Dadoxylon agathiforme, Agathoxylon mecsekense, Araucarioxylon resiniferum, Brachyoxylon sp., Dadoxylon sp. and Baieroxylon sp.[47] This Genus represent the most diverse wood found locally, with several assigned specimens of poor preservation, but that can confidently be referred to Agathoxylon.[52] |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Araucariaceae inside Coniferales. Shows a mixed type radial pitting, with pits half uniseriate half biseriate, and, in some cases only, triseriate.[52] |
| |
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Araucariaceae inside Coniferales. Unique of úrkút, has been synonymized with Agathoxylon, although some trunks have different symmetry.[47] It was originally thought to come from Aptian clay (now Albian clay), although this partly silicified sample is probably reworked from Liassic layers.[52] |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Cupressaceae inside Coniferales. This wood, poorly preserved, was only briefly mentioned, and is more probably conspecific with Platyspiroxylon sp. 2.[52] |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Taxaceae inside Coniferales. Labelled "Platyspiroxylon parenchymatosum, P. Greguss, Úrkút, István akna".[52] |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Taxaceae inside Coniferales. Labelled 'Técsbányatelep, András akna, 6. szint, 7. réteg, fővágat" [Pécsbányatelep, András shaft, 6th. level, 7th layer, main gallery], the sample anatomy, with mixed pitting and taxodioid cross-fields, clearly points out the genus Prototaxodioxylon.[52] |
||
|
|
|
Affinities with the family Podocarpaceae inside Coniferales. Can be related with Araucarioxylon sp. 5 ?.[52] |
| |
References
- ↑ Grasselly, G. Y. U. L. A., Balogh, K., Toth, M. A. R. I. A., & Polgari, M. A. R. T. A. (1994). K/Ar age of manganese oxide ores of Úrkút, Hungary: Ar retention in K-bearing Mn minerals. Geologica Carpathica, 45(6), 365-373.
- ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 Drubina-Szabo, M. (1959). Manganese deposits of Hungary. Economic Geology, 54(6), 1078-1094
- ↑ Jenkyns, H. C., Géczy, B., & Marshall, J. D. (1991). Jurassic manganese carbonates of central Europe and the early Toarcian anoxic event. The Journal of Geology, 99(2), 137-149.
- ↑ Polgari, M., TAZAKI, K., WATANABE, H., VIGH, T., & GUCSIK, A. (2006). Manganese geochemistry reflected by black shale formation and diagenetic processes-Model of formation of the carbonatic manganese ore of URKUT Manganese geochemistry reflected by black shale formation and diagenetic processes-Model of formation of the carbonatic manganese ore of URKUT, 1993. Clay science, 12, 233–239.
- ↑ Suan, G., Schlögl, J., & Mattioli, E. (2016). Bio-and chemostratigraphy of the Toarcian organic-rich deposits of some key successions of the Alpine Tethys. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 49(3), 401–419.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Polgári, M., Tóth, M., Dobosi, G., Bajnóczy, B., Szabó, Z., & Vigh, T. (2004). Az úrkúti halmaradványokat tartalmazó konkréciók ásványos- éskémiai összetételének vizsgálata (Mineralogical and chemical investigations on the fish-including nodules of Úrkút). Bányászati és Kohászati Lapok –Bányászat, 137(6), 47–48. [in Hungarian]
- ↑ 7.00 7.01 7.02 7.03 7.04 7.05 7.06 7.07 7.08 7.09 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14 7.15 Kedves, M. (1993). Plant microfossils from the Jurassic manganese ore layers of Úrkút, Hungary. In Plant Cell Biology and Development, JATE, Szeged, Special issue (pp. 11–21).
- ↑ Vámos, R. (1969). Microbiological processes of silicification of the fossil trunks found in Liassic manganese ore: With 3 figures in the text. Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie: Mitteilungen, 17(1), 301-305.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Galácz, A., Horváth, F., & Voros, A. (1985). Sedimentary and structural evolution of the Bakony Mountains (Transdanubian Central Range, Hungary): palaeogeographic implications. Acta Geologica Hungarica, 28(1-2), 85-100.
- ↑ Biro, L., Polgari, M., & Pal-Molnar, E. (2012). The revaluation of the drillings of the manganese mineralization in Eplény (Hungary). Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 7(3), 109–117.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 NEMETH, J. C., & Grasselly, G. (1966). Data on the geology and mineralogy of the manganese ore deposit of Úrkút II. Acta Mineral. Petrogr., Szeged, 17, 89–114.
- ↑ Dulai, A. (2003). Taxonomic composition of Mediterranean Early Jurassic brachiopod faunas from Hungary: Niche replacement and depth control. Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica, 21, 43–50.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 Polgári, M., Hein, J. R., Vigh, T., Szabó-Drubina, M., Fórizs, I., Bíró, L., ... & Tóth, A. L. (2012). Microbial processes and the origin of the Úrkút manganese deposit, Hungary. Ore Geology Reviews, 47, 87–109.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 M. Polgári Manganese geochemistry reflected by black shale formation and diagenetic processes — model of formation of the carbonatic manganese ore of Úrkút Special Series of Hungarian Geological Institute, Karpati Publish House, Ushgorod (1993) 211 pp.
- ↑ Szabó, Z., Grasselly, G., & Cseh-Németh, J. (1981). Some conceptual questions regarding the origin of manganese in the Úrkút deposit, Hungary. Chemical Geology, 34(1-2), 19–29. doi:10.1016/0009-2541(81)90068-1
- ↑ H.C. Jenkyns "The Early Toarcian (Jurassic) anoxic event: stratigraphic, sedimentary, and geochemical evidence" Am. J. Sci., 288 (1988), pp. 101–151
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 M. Polgári, Z. Szabó, T. Szederkényi (Eds.), Manganese Ores in Hungary – In Commemoration of Professor Gyula Grasselly – Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Juhász Publishing House, Szeged (2000)675 pp.
- ↑ M. Polgári, K. Tazaki, H. Watanabe, T. Vigh Geochemical aspect of chemolithoautotroph bacterial activity in the role of black shale hosted Mn mineralization, Jurassic age, Hungary, Europe Clay Sci., 12 (Suppl. 2) (2006), pp. 233-239
- ↑ Z. Szabó, Gy Grasselly Genesis of manganese oxide ore in the Úrkút basin, Hungary I.M. Varentsov, Gy Grasselly (Eds.), Geology and Geochemistry of Manganese, Vol. 2, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest (1980), pp. 223-236
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 M. Polgári, J.R. Hein, M. Tóth, T. Vigh, L. Bíró Did hydrothermal fluids contribute to the huge Úrkút carbonate body? Abstracts, Goldschmidt Conference, A801 (2007)
- ↑ Bíró, L., Polgári, M., Tóth, T., & Vigh, T. (2012). Refinement of genetic and structural models of the Úrkút manganese ore deposit (W-Hungary, Europe) using statistical evaluation of archive data. Open Geosciences, 4(3), 478-494.
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Grasselly, G., & Klivényi, É. (1960). Data on the phosphorus content and organic remains of manganese oxide ores from Úrkút. Acta Miner.—Petr. Szeged, 12, 3-8.
- ↑ Grasselly, G. (1968). On the phosphorus-bearing mineral of the manganese oxide ore deposits of Eplény and Úrkút. Acta Mineralogica-Petrographica, 18(2), 73-83.
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Polgari, M., Biro, L., Pal-Molnar, E., Dobosi, G., Bajnoczi, B., Nemeth, T., ... & Vigh, T. (2013). Rhodochrosite-Bearing Concretions from a Jurassic Manganese Ore Mineralization–Urkut, Hungary. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 8(4), 139-146.
- ↑ M. Polgári, M. Philippe, M. Szabó-Drubina, M. Tóth Manganese-impregnated wood from a Toarcian manganese ore deposit, Eplény Mine, Bakony Mts, Transdanubia, Hungary N. Jhb. Geol. Paläont. Monathefte, 3 (2005), pp. 175-192
- ↑ Polgári, M., Hein, J. R., Németh, T., Pál-Molnár, E., & Vigh, T. (2013). Celadonite and smectite formation in the Úrkút Mn-carbonate ore deposit (Hungary). Sedimentary Geology, 294, 157-163.
- ↑ Weiszburg, T. G., Tóth, E., & Beran, A. (2004). Celadonite, the 10-Å green clay mineral of the manganese carbonate ore, Úrkút, Hungary. Acta Mineralogica-Petrographica, 45(1), 65-80.
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 Leskó, M. Z., Papp, R. Z., Topa, B. A., Kristály, F., Vigh, T., & Zajzon, N. (2019). Smectite appearance in the footwall of the Úrkút manganese ore deposit, Bakony Mts., Hungary. Central European Geology, 62(1), 100-118.
- ↑ Polgári, M., Szabó, Z., Szabó-Drubina, M., Hein, J. R., & Yeh, H. W. (2005). A porous silica rock (“tripoli”) in the footwall of the Jurassic Úrkút manganese deposit, Hungary: Composition, and origin through carbonate dissolution. Sedimentary Geology, 177(1-2), 87–96.
- ↑ Grasselly, G., & Pantó, G. (1988). Rare Earth Elements in the manganese deposit of Úrkút (Bakony Mountains, Hungary). Ore Geology Reviews, 4(1-2), 115–124. doi:10.1016/0169-1368(88)90007-8
- ↑ Gyollai, I., Polgári, M. P., Biró, L., Vigh, T., Kovács, T., & Pál-Molnár, E. (2018). Fossilized biomats as the possible source of high natural radionuclide content at the jurassic úrkút manganese ore deposit, Hungary. CARPATHIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 13(2), 477-487.
- ↑ 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 Lantos, Z., Vető, I., Földvári, M., & Kovács-Pálffy, P. (2003). On the role of remote magmatic source and intrabasinal redeposition in the genesis of the Toarvian Úrkút Manganese ore, Hungary. Acta Geologica Hungarica, 46(4), 321-340.
- ↑ Galácz, A. (1988). Tectonically controlled sedimentation in the Jurassic of the Bakony Mountains (Transdanubian Central Range), Hungary. Acta Geologica Hungarica, 31(3-4), 313-328.
- ↑ Simoncsics, P., & Kedves, M. (1961). Paleobotanical examinations on manganese series in Úrkút (Hungary, Transdanubia). Acta Mineral-Petrograph Szegeden, 14, 27-57.
- ↑ Papp, R.Z., B.A. Topa , T. Vigh , N. Zajzon 2015: Geochemical and mineralogical study of Eplény Mn-deposit, Hungary. – Goldschmidt Abstracts, Poster board 4063, p. 2399
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 36.2 Polgári, M., Szabó-Drubina, M., & Szabó, Z. (2004). Theoretical model for Jurassic manganese mineralization in Central Europe, Úrkút, Hungary. Bulletin of Geosciences, 79(1), 53-61.
- ↑ Polgári, M., Hein, J. R., Tóth, A. L., Pál-Molnár, E., Vigh, T., Bíró, L., & Fintor, K. (2012). Microbial action formed Jurassic Mn-carbonate ore deposit in only a few hundred years (Úrkút, Hungary). Geology, 40(10), 903-906.
- ↑ 38.0 38.1 38.2 38.3 38.4 38.5 38.6 38.7 38.8 38.9 Dulai, A., Suba, Z., & Szarka, A. (1993). Toarci alsojura szervesanyagdus fkete pala a mecseki réka-völgyben. Földtani Közlöny, 122(1), 67-87.
- ↑ 39.0 39.1 39.2 Vörös, A. (1986). Brachiopod palaeoecology on a Thethyan Jurassic Seamount (Pliensbachian, Bakony Mountains, Hungary). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 57(2-4), 241-271.
- ↑ 40.00 40.01 40.02 40.03 40.04 40.05 40.06 40.07 40.08 40.09 40.10 40.11 40.12 40.13 40.14 40.15 40.16 40.17 Vörös, A. (2009). The Pliensbachian brachiopods of the Bakony Mountains (Hungary). Geological Institute of Hungary/Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet.
- ↑ 41.0 41.1 41.2 41.3 41.4 41.5 41.6 J. Szabo. 1980. Lower and Middle Jurassic Gastropods from the Bakony Mountains (Hungary). Part II. Pleurotomariacea and Fissurellacea (Archaeograstropoda). Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 72:49-71
- ↑ 42.0 42.1 42.2 Szabó, J. (1981). Lower and Middle Jurassic gastropods from the Bakony Mountains (Hungary). PartIII. Patellacea and Trochacea (Archaeogastropoda). Annales historico-naturale Musei nationalis Hungarici, 73, 55-67.
- ↑ 43.0 43.1 43.2 43.3 43.4 43.5 43.6 A. Galácz, B. Géczy, and M. Monostori. 2008. Csernye revisited: New ammonite finds and ostracods from the Lower Jurassic Pliensbachian/Toarcian boundary beds in Bakonycsernye, Transdanubian Hungary. Geologica Pannonica 36:187-225
- ↑ 44.0 44.1 44.2 Szabó, M., & Pálfy, J. (2020). Dapedium sp. from the Toarcian (Lower Jurassic) Úrkút Manganese Ore Formation (Bakony Mts., Hungary) and an overview of diversity of dapediiform fishes. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 100(1), 179-195.
- ↑ 45.00 45.01 45.02 45.03 45.04 45.05 45.06 45.07 45.08 45.09 45.10 45.11 45.12 45.13 45.14 45.15 45.16 45.17 45.18 45.19 45.20 45.21 45.22 45.23 Simoncsics,P. et al. (1961) Paleobotanical examinations on Manganese Series in Urkut (Hungary, Transdanubia). Acta Mineralogica-Petrographica (Szeged) Vol. 14 P. 27- 57
- ↑ 46.00 46.01 46.02 46.03 46.04 46.05 46.06 46.07 46.08 46.09 46.10 46.11 46.12 46.13 46.14 46.15 46.16 46.17 46.18 46.19 46.20 46.21 46.22 46.23 46.24 46.25 46.26 46.27 46.28 46.29 46.30 46.31 46.32 46.33 46.34 46.35 46.36 46.37 46.38 46.39 46.40 Kedves,M. (1990) Palynological studies on Manganese Ore Layers in Urkut (Transdanubia), Hungary. (In: Palynology of Ore Deposits. E.I. Robbins, editor) Ore Geology Reviews Vol. 5 # 1 P. 491- 507
- ↑ 47.00 47.01 47.02 47.03 47.04 47.05 47.06 47.07 47.08 47.09 47.10 47.11 47.12 47.13 47.14 Vadász, E. (1964). Geological problems of fossil wood in Hungary. Acta Geol. Acad. Sci. Hung, 8, 119-43.
- ↑ 48.00 48.01 48.02 48.03 48.04 48.05 48.06 48.07 48.08 48.09 48.10 Greguss, P. (1952). Magyarorszagi mezozoi famaradvanyok. Földtani, 82, 157-180.
- ↑ 49.0 49.1 49.2 49.3 49.4 49.5 49.6 49.7 49.8 49.9 GREGUSS, P. (1967): Fossil gymnosperm woods in Hungary from the Permian to the Pliocene. - Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 136 pp
- ↑ 50.0 50.1 50.2 50.3 50.4 50.5 50.6 50.7 50.8 50.9 GREGUSS, P. & KEDVES, M . (1961): Adatok a hazai mezozoos fatörzsek ismeretéhez. (Contribution to the knowledge of mesozoic trees of Hungary.) Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet Évi Jelentése az 1957-1958. évről: 435-444.
- ↑ 51.0 51.1 51.2 51.3 51.4 51.5 51.6 51.7 51.8 51.9 GREGUSS, P. (1974): Új fenyőféleség az eplényi jurakori mangánérc bányából. [A new representative of Conifers in Eplény Jurassic manganese mine.] - Magyar Állami Földtani intézet Évi Jelentése az 1972. évről: 167-187
- ↑ 52.00 52.01 52.02 52.03 52.04 52.05 52.06 52.07 52.08 52.09 52.10 52.11 52.12 52.13 52.14 52.15 52.16 52.17 52.18 Philippe, M., & Barbacka, M. (1997, December). A reappraisal of the Jurassic woods from Hungary. In ANNALES HISTORICO NATURALES-MUSEI NATIONALIS HUNGARICI (Vol. 89, pp. 11-22). HUNGARIAN NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM.
- ↑ 53.0 53.1 53.2 Andreanszky, G. (1949). Baumstämme aus der unteren Kreidezeit. Fdldt. Kozl, 79, 244-252.
- ↑ 54.0 54.1 54.2 54.3 Polgári, M., Philippe, M., Szábo-Drubina, M., & Tóth, M. (2005). Manganese-impregnated wood from a Toarcian manganese ore deposit, Epleny mine, Bakony Mts., Transdanubia, Hungary. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Monatshefte, 175-192.
 |  |
