Biology:Holostei

From HandWiki
Short description: Group of bony fish

Holostei
Temporal range: Early Triassic–Recent
Lepisosteus oculatus.jpg
Spotted gar, Lepisosteus oculatus
Amia calva1.jpg
Bowfin, Amia calva
Scientific classification e
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Actinopterygii
Subclass: Neopterygii
Infraclass: Holostei
Müller, 1846
Clades (with orders)

Holostei is a group of ray-finned bony fish. It is divided into two major clades, the Halecomorphi, represented by the single living genus, Amia with two species, the bowfins (Amia calva and Amia ocellicauda), as well as the Ginglymodi, the sole living representatives being the gars (Lepisosteidae), represented by seven living species in two genera (Atractosteus, Lepisosteus).[1] The earliest members of the clade appeared during the Early Triassic, over 250 million years ago.[2]

Holostei was thought to be regarded as paraphyletic. However, a recent study provided evidence that the Holostei are the closest living relates of the Teleostei, both within the Neopterygii. This was found from the morphology of the Holostei, for example presence of a paired vomer.[3] Holosteans are closer to teleosts than are the chondrosteans, the other group intermediate between teleosts and cartilaginous fish, which are regarded as (at the nearest[lower-alpha 1]) a sister group to the Neopterigii.

The spiracles of holosteans are reduced to vestigial remnants and the bones are lightly ossified. The thick ganoid scales of the gars are more primitive than those of the bowfin.

Characteristics

Holosteans share with other non-teleost ray-finned fish a mixture of characteristics of teleosts and sharks. In comparison with the other group of non-teleost ray-finned fish, the chondrosteans, the holosteans are closer to the teleosts and further from sharks: the pair of spiracles found in sharks and chondrosteans is reduced in holosteans to a remnant structure: in gars, the spiracles do not even open to the outside;[4] the skeleton is lightly ossified: a thin layer of bone covers a mostly cartilaginous skeleton in the bowfins. In gars, the tail is still heterocercal but less so than in the chondrosteans. Bowfins have many-rayed dorsal fins and can breathe air like the bichirs.

In the holosteans a primary pulmonoid (respiratory) swim bladder is still present, a trait that was independently lost in both chondrostei and teleostei, the only other two lineages of fish with a swim bladder (in some teleosts the swim bladder have since evolved to become secondarily respiratory again).[5]

The gars have thick ganoid scales typical of sturgeons whereas the bowfin has thin bony scales like the teleosts. The gars are therefore in this regard considered more primitive than the bowfin.[6]

The name Holostei derives from the Greek words holos, meaning whole, and osteon, meaning bone: a reference to their bony skeletons.

Systematics of Neopterygii

The evolutionary relationships of gars, bowfin and teleosts were a matter of debate. There are two competing hypotheses on the systematics of neopterygians:

Halecostomi hypothesis

The Halecostomi hypothesis proposes Halecomorphi (bowfin and its fossil relatives) as the sister group of Teleostei, the major group of living neopterygians, rendering the Holostei paraphyletic.[7]

Neopterygii

Ginglymodi Alligator gar fish (white background).jpg

Halecostomi

Halecomorphi Amia calva (white background).jpg

Teleostei Common carp (white background).jpg

Holostei hypothesis

The Holostei hypothesis is better supported[8][9][10][11] than the Halecostomi hypothesis, rendering the latter paraphyletic. It proposes Halecomorphi as the sister group of Ginglymodi, the group which includes living gars (Lepisosteiformes) and their fossil relatives.[12][13][1] Ginglymodi and Halecomorphi form the clade Holostei, which is the sister group to Teleostei.

Neopterygii
Holostei

Ginglymodi Alligator gar fish (white background).jpg

Halecomorphi Amia calva (white background).jpg

Teleostei Common carp (white background).jpg

Ginglymodi comprises three orders: Lepisosteiformes, Semionotiformes and Kyphosichthyiformes. Lepisosteiformes includes 1 family, 2 genera, and 7 species that are commonly referred to as gars. Semionotiformes and Kyphosichthyiformes are extinct orders.

Halecomorphi contains the orders Parasemionotiformes, Panxianichthyiformes, Ionoscopiformes, and Amiiformes. In addition to many extinct species, Amiiformes includes only 1 extant species that is commonly referred to as the bowfin. Parasemionotiformes, Panxianichthyiformes, and Ionoscopiformes have no living members.

Gars and bowfins are found in North America and in freshwater ecosystems. The differences in each can be spotted very easily from just looking at the fishes. The gars have elongated jaws with fanlike teeth, only 3 branchiostegal rays, and a small dorsal fin. Meanwhile the bowfins have a terminal mouth, 10–13 flattened branchiostegal rays, and a long dorsal fin.

Phylogeny of bony fishes

Cipactlichthys scutatus holotype fossil, from the Lower Cretaceous Tlayua Formation of Mexico[14]

The cladogram shows the relationships of holosteans to other living groups of bony fish (Osteichthyes), the great majority of which are teleosts,[15] and to the terrestrial vertebrates (tetrapods) that evolved from a related group of lobe-finned fish.[16][17] Approximate dates are from Near et al. (2012).[15]

Euteleostomi/
Actinopterygii 400 mya

part of "Chondrostei"[lower-alpha 2] Polypteridae (bichirs) Cuvier-105-Polyptère.jpg

part of "Chondrostei"

Acipenseriformes (sturgeons, paddlefish) Atlantic sturgeon flipped.jpg

Neopterygii 360 mya

Holostei (bowfins, gars) 275 mya Amia calva (white background).jpg

Teleostei 310 mya Common carp (white background).jpg

Sarcopterygii

Actinistia (Coelacanths) Coelacanth flipped.png

Dipnoi (Lungfish) Chinle fish Arganodus cropped cropped.png

Tetrapods

Amphibians Salamandra salamandra (white background).jpg

Amniota

Mammals Ruskea rotta.png

Sauropsids (reptiles, birds) Zoology of Egypt (1898) (Varanus exanthematicus).png

Osteichthyes

Notes

  1. Depending who you ask, the Chondrostei may be paraphyletic, or the Polypteridae may be considered not part of them.
  2. Thus the former "Chondrostei" is not a clade, but is broken up. See Actinopteri for a possible reclassification.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 López-Arbarello, Adriana; Sferco, Emilia (March 2018). "Neopterygian phylogeny: the merger assay.". Royal Society Open Science 5 (3): 172337. doi:10.1098/rsos.172337. PMID 29657820. Bibcode2018RSOS....572337L. 
  2. Romano, Carlo (2021). "A Hiatus Obscures the Early Evolution of Modern Lineages of Bony Fishes". Frontiers in Earth Science 8: 672. doi:10.3389/feart.2020.618853. ISSN 2296-6463. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/198125/1/feart-08-618853-2.pdf. 
  3. Hastings, Walker Jr., Galland (2014). FISHES, A GUIDE TO THEIR DIVERSITY. Oakland, California: University of California Press. pp. 60–62. 
  4. Ontario. Game and fish commission
  5. Respiratory Biology of Animals: evolutionary and functional morphology
  6. Rick Leah. "Holostei". University of Liverpool (http://www.liv.ac.uk). http://www.liv.ac.uk/~rickl/Fisheries_Web/ichthyology/holostei.htm. 
  7. Patterson C. Interrelationships of holosteans. In: Greenwood P H, Miles R S, Patterson C, eds. Interrelationships of Fishes. Zool J Linn Soc, 1973, 53(Suppl): 233–305
  8. Betancur-R (2016). "Phylogenetic Classification of Bony Fishes Version 4". https://sites.google.com/site/guilleorti/classification-v-4. 
  9. Nelson, Joseph, S. (2016). Fishes of the World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-1-118-34233-6. 
  10. "Actinopterygii". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=161061. 
  11. R. Froese and D. Pauly, ed (February 2006). "FishBase". http://www.fishbase.org. 
  12. Olsen P. E. (1984). "The skull and pectoral girdle of the parasemionotid fish Watsonulus eugnathoides from the Early Triassic Sakemena Group of Madagascar with comments on the relationships of the holostean fishes". J Vertebr Paleontol 4 (3): 481–499. doi:10.1080/02724634.1984.10012024. Bibcode1984JVPal...4..481O. 
  13. Grande, Lance; Bemis, William E. (1998). "A Comprehensive Phylogenetic Study of Amiid Fishes (Amiidae) Based on Comparative Skeletal Anatomy. an Empirical Search for Interconnected Patterns of Natural History". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18 (sup001): 1–696. doi:10.1080/02724634.1998.10011114. Bibcode1998JVPal..18S...1G. 
  14. Brito, Paulo M.; Alvarado-Ortega, Jesus (2013). "Cipactlichthys scutatus, gen. nov., sp. nov. a New Halecomorph (Neopterygii, Holostei) from the Lower Cretaceous Tlayua Formation of Mexico". PLOS ONE 8 (9): e73551. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073551. PMID 24023885. Bibcode2013PLoSO...873551B. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 Thomas J. Near (2012). "Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification". PNAS 109 (34): 13698–13703. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206625109. PMID 22869754. Bibcode2012PNAS..10913698N. 
  16. Betancur-R, Ricardo (2013). "The Tree of Life and a New Classification of Bony Fishes". PLOS Currents Tree of Life 5 (Edition 1). doi:10.1371/currents.tol.53ba26640df0ccaee75bb165c8c26288. PMID 23653398. 
  17. Laurin, M.; Reisz, R.R. (1995). "A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 113 (2): 165–223. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb00932.x. 

External links

Wikidata ☰ Q846164 entry