Philosophy:Mahābhūta

From HandWiki
Classical elements
Stoicheion (στοιχεῖον)
  Air  
Water Aether Fire
  Earth  
  Vayu  
Ap Akasha Agni
  Prithvi  
Wuxing (五行)
  Wood (木)  
Water (水)   Fire (火)
Metal (金) Earth (土)
Godai (五大)
  Air (風)  
Water (水) Void (空) Fire (火)
  Earth (地)  
Bön
  Air  
Water Aether Fire
  Earth  
Alchemy
  Air Alchemy air symbol.svg  
Water Alchemy water symbol.svg Aether Fire Alchemy fire symbol.svg
  Earth Alchemy earth symbol.svg
Sulphur Sulphur.svg MercuryMercury symbol.svg Salt Salt symbol (alchemy).svg

Mahābhūta is Sanskrit and Pāli for "great element".[1] However, very few scholars define the four mahābhūtas in a broader sense as the four fundamental aspects of physical reality.

Hinduism

Main page: Philosophy:Pancha Bhoota

In Hinduism's sacred literature, the "great" or "gross" elements (mahābhūta) are fivefold: space (or "ether"), air, fire, water and earth.[2][3] See also the Samkhya Karika of Ishvara Krishna, verse 22.

For instance, the Taittirīya Upaniṣad describes the five "sheaths" of a person (Sanskrit: puruṣa), starting with the grossest level of the five evolving great elements:

From this very self (ātman) did space come into being; from space, air; from air, fire; from fire, the waters, from the waters, the earth; from the earth, plants; from plants, food; and from food, man.... Different from and lying within this man formed from the essence of food is the self (ātman) consisting of lifebreath.... Different from and lying within this self consisting of breath is the self (ātman) consisting of mind.... Different from and lying within this self consisting of mind is the self (ātman) consisting of perception.... Different from and lying within this self consisting of perception is the self (ātman) consisting of bliss....[4]

In the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad, God is identified as the source of the great elements:

Some wise men say it is inherent nature, while others say it is time – all totally deluded. It is rather the greatness of God present in the world by means of which this wheel of brahman goes around. Who always encompasses this whole world – the knower, the architect of time, the one without qualities, and the all-knowing one – it is at his command that the work of creation, to be conceived of as earth, water, fire, air, and space, unfolds itself.[5]

The same Upanishad also mentions, "When earth, water fire, air and akasa arise, when the five attributes of the elements, mentioned in the books on yoga, become manifest then the yogi's body becomes purified by the fire of yoga and he is free from illness, old age and death." (Verse 2.12).[6]

Buddhism

In Buddhism, the four Great Elements (Pali: cattāro mahābhūtāni) are earth, water, fire and air. Mahābhūta is generally synonymous with catudhātu, which is Pāli for the "Four Elements."[7] In early Buddhism, the Four Elements are a basis for understanding that leads one through unbinding of 'Rupa' or materiality to the supreme state of pure 'Emptiness' or Nirvana.

Definitions

In the Pali canon,[8] the most basic elements are usually identified as four in number but, on occasion, a fifth and, to an even lesser extent, a sixth element may also be identified.

Four primary elements

In canonical texts, the four Great Elements refer to elements that are both "external" (that is, outside the body, such as a river) and "internal" (that is, of the body, such as blood). These elements are described as follows:

  • Earth element (pruṭhavī-dhātu)
    Earth element represents the quality of solidity or attractive forces. Any matter where attractive forces are in prominence (solid bodies) are called earth elements. Internal earth elements include head hair, body hair, nails, teeth, skin, flesh, sinews, bone, organs, intestinal material, etc.[9]
  • Water element (āpa-dhātu)
    Water element represents the quality of liquidity or relative motion. Any matter where relative motion of particles is in prominence are called water elements. Internal water elements include bile, phlegm, pus, blood, sweat, fat, tears, nasal mucus, urine, semen, etc.[10]
  • Fire element (teja-dhātu)
    Fire element represents the quality of heat or energy. Any matter where energy is in prominence are called fire elements. Internal fire elements include those bodily mechanisms that produce physical warmth, ageing, digestion, etc.
  • Air (or wind) element (vāyu-dhātu)
    Air element represents the quality of expansion or repulsive forces. Any matter where repulsive forces are in prominence are called air elements. Internal air elements includes air associated with the pulmonary system (for example, for breathing), the intestinal system ("winds in the belly and bowels"), etc.

Any entity that carry one or more of these qualities (attractive forces, repulsive forces, energy and relative motion) are called matter (rupa). The material world is considered to be nothing but a combination of these qualities arranged in space (akasa). The result of these qualities are the inputs to our five senses, color (varna) to the eyes, smell (gandha) to the nose, taste (rasa) to the tongue, sound ('shabda') to the ears, and touch, to the body. The matter that we perceive in our mind are just a mental interpretation of these qualities.

Fifth and sixth elements

In addition to the above four elements of underived matter, two other elements are occasionally found in the Pali Canon:[11]

  • Space element (ākāsa-dhātu)
    Internal space elements includes bodily orifices such as the ears, nostrils, mouth, anus, etc.
  • Consciousness element (viññāṇa-dhātu)
    Described as "pure and bright" (parisuddhaṃ pariyodātaṃ), used to cognise the three feelings (vedana) of pleasure, pain and neither-pleasure-nor-pain, and the arising and passing of the sense contact (phassa) upon which these feelings are dependent.

According to the Abhidhamma Pitaka, the "space element" is identified as "secondary" or "derived" (upādā).[12]

Sensory qualities, not substances

While in the Theravada tradition, as well as in the earliest texts, like the Pali Canon, rūpa (matter or form) is delineated as something external, that actually exists,[13][14][15][16][17][18] in some of the later schools, like the Yogacara, or "Mind Only" school, and schools heavily influenced by this school, rupa means both materiality and sensibility—it signifies, for example, a tactile object both insofar as that object is tactile and that it can be sensed. In some of these schools, rūpa is not a materiality which can be separated or isolated from cognizance; such a non-empirical category is incongruous in the context of some schools of Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism. In the Yogacara view, rūpa is not a substratum or substance which has sensibility as a property. For this school, it functions as perceivable physicality and matter, or rūpa, is defined in its function; what it does, not what it is.[19] As such, the four great elements are conceptual abstractions drawn from the sensorium. They are sensorial typologies, and are not metaphysically materialistic.[20] From this perspective, they are not meant to give an account of matter as constitutive of external, mind-independent reality.[21] This interpretation was hotly contested by some Madhyamaka thinkers like Chandrakirti.[22]

Soteriological uses

The Four Elements are used in Buddhist texts to both elucidate the concept of suffering (dukkha) and as an object of meditation. The earliest Buddhist texts explain that the four primary material elements are the sensory qualities solidity, fluidity, temperature, and mobility; their characterisation as earth, water, fire, and air, respectively, is declared an abstraction – instead of concentrating on the fact of material existence, one observes how a physical thing is sensed, felt, perceived.[23]

Understanding suffering

The Four Elements pertinence to the Buddhist notion of suffering comes about due to:

  • The Four Elements are the primary component of "form" (rūpa).
  • "Form" is first category of the "Five Aggregates" (khandhas).
  • The Five Aggregates are the ultimate basis for suffering (dukkha) in the "Four Noble Truths."

Schematically, this can be represented in reverse order as:

Four Noble Truths → Suffering → Aggregates → Form → Four Elements

Thus, to deeply understand the Buddha's Four Noble Truths, it is beneficial to have an understanding of the Great Elements.

Meditation object

In the Mahasatipatthana Sutta ("The Greater Discourse on the Foundations of Mindfulness," DN 22), in listing various bodily meditation techniques, the Buddha instructs:

"...Just as if a skilled butcher or his assistant, having slaughtered a cow, were to sit at a crossroads with the carcass divided into portions, so a monk reviews this very body ... in terms of the elements: 'There are in this body the earth-element, the water-element, the fire-element, the air-element.' So he abides contemplating body in body internally...."[24]

In the Visuddhimagga's well-known list of forty meditation objects (kammaṭṭhāna), the great elements are listed as the first four objects.

B. Alan Wallace compares the Theravada meditative practice of "attending to the emblem of consciousness" to the practice in Mahamudra and Dzogchen of "maintaining the mind upon non-conceptuality", which is also aimed at focusing on the nature of consciousness.[25]

Buddhist sources

In the Pali canon, the Four Elements are described in detail in the following discourses (sutta):

  • Mahahatthipadompama Sutta ("The Greater Discourse on the Simile of the Elephant's Footprint," MN 28)[26]
  • Maharahulovada Sutta ("The Greater Discourse of Advice to Rahula," MN 62)[27]
  • Dhatuvibhanga Sutta ("The Exposition of the Elements," MN 140)[28]

The Four Elements are also referenced in:

  • Kevaddha Sutta (DN 11)[29]
  • Mahasatipatthana Sutta (DN 22)
  • Satipatthana Sutta (MN 10)
  • Chabbisodhana Sutta (MN 112)
  • Bahudhatuka Sutta (MN 115)
  • Kayagatasati Sutta (MN 119)[30]
  • Anathapindikovada Sutta (MN 143)[31]
  • Catudhatu-vaggo (SN ch. 14, subch. IV), several discourses[32]
  • Saddhammapatirupaka Sutta (SN 16.13)[33]
  • Bija Sutta (SN 22.54)[34]
  • Asivisa Sutta (SN 35.197 or 35.238)[35]
  • Kimsuka Sutta (SN 35.204 or 35.245)[36]
  • Dutiya-mittamacca Sutta (SN 55.17)[37]
  • various brief Samyutta Nikaya discourses entitled, "Dhatu Sutta" (SN 18.9,[38] SN 25.9,[39] SN 26.9,[40] SN 27.9[41])
  • Tittha Sutta (AN 3.61)[42]
  • Nivesaka Sutta (AN 3.75)
  • Rahula Sutta (AN 4.177)

In addition, the Visuddhimagga XI.27ff has an extensive discussion of the Four Elements.[43]

See also

  • Classical element
  • Dukkha
  • Four Noble Truths
  • Khandhas
  • Panchatattva (Tantra)
  • Prakriti (Mulaprakriti) (Vedic conceptions of the basic elements of the universe)
  • Rupa
  • Samkhya (school of classical Indian philosophy, which including ether, defines Mahabhuta as 5 subtle elements)
  • Tanmatras
  • Gogyo Japanese Non-Substantial five Elements


Notes

  1. ↑ Or, more literally, "Great Natures." See Rhys Davids & Stede (1921–25), p. 507, entry for "Bhūta."[yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  2. ↑ See, e.g., Monier-Williams Sanskrit Dictionary where Mahābhūta is defined as: "a great element, gross el[ement] (of which 5 are reckoned, viz. ether, air, fire, water, earth ..., as distinguished from the subtle el[ement] or Tanmātra...)." Monier-Williams (1899), p. 798, entry for "Mahā-," retrieved 24 December 2008 from "U. Cologne" at http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/MWScan/MWScanpdf/mw0798-mahApheTkArIya.pdf.
  3. ↑ Gopal, Madan (1990). K.S. Gautam. ed. India through the ages. Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. p. 79. https://archive.org/details/indiathroughages00mada. 
  4. ↑ TU 2.1–2.5, trans. Olivelle (1996), pp. 185–7.
  5. ↑ SU 6.1–6.2, trans. Olivelle (1996), p. 263.
  6. ↑ Shvetashvatara Upanishad
  7. ↑ Note that the Pāli word dhātu is used in multiple contexts in the Pāli canon. For instance, Bodhi (2000), pp. 527–8, identifies four different ways that dhātu is used including in terms of the "eighteen elements" and, as in this article, in terms of "the four primary elements."
  8. ↑ These elaborations on the elements can be found in the Majjhima Nikaya discourses nos. 28, 62, 140. See below for more information.
  9. ↑ The traditional list of body parts associated with the earth element are the first 19 of 31 body parts – from head hair to feces – identified in the Pali Canon with the contemplation of Patikulamanasikara, with the catch all phrase of "or whatever else internal, within oneself, is hard, solid, & sustained" (trans. Thanissaro, 2003b) added.
  10. ↑ The traditional list of water-element body parts are the latter twelve of 31 body parts – from bile to urine – identified in Patikulamanasikara contemplations, with the catch all phrase of "or whatever else internal, within oneself, is liquid, watery, & sustained" (trans. Thanissaro, 2003b) added.
  11. ↑ The "space element" is encountered more frequently in the canonical discourses than is the "consciousness element." Examples of discourses that include both of these latter elements are DN 33 (Walshe, 1995, p. 500, para. 16), MN 140 (Thanissaro, 1997c), and SN 27.9 (Thanissaro, 1994).
  12. ↑ Hamilton (2001), pp. 5, 35 n. 9. For more information regarding "primary/underived" and "secondary/derived" matter, see the article Rupa.
  13. ↑ Bodhi, Bhikkhu, "The Connected Discourses", Wisdom Publications, 2000, chapter 22.94 "And what is it, bhikkhus, that the wise in the world agree upon as existing, of which I too say that it exists? Form that is impermanent, suffering, and subject to change: this the wise in the world agree upon as existing, and I too say that it exists. "
  14. ↑ Narada Thera, "A Manual of Abhidhamma", Buddhist Missionary Society, 1956 pages 342–343 "Buddhism does not attempt to solve the problem of the ultimate origin of matter. It takes for granted that matter exists and states that rupa develops in four ways.
  15. ↑ Bodhi, Bhikkhu, "The Long Discourses", Wisdom Publications, 1995, chapter 28 "If, friends, internally the eye is intact but no external forms come into its range, and there is no corresponding conscious engagement, then there is no manifestation of the corresponding section of consciousness. If internally the eye is intact and external forms come into its range, but there is no corresponding conscious engagement, then there is no manifestation of the corresponding section of consciousness. But when internally the eye is intact and external forms come into its range and there is the corresponding conscious engagement, then there is the manifestation of the corresponding section of consciousness." "Now there comes a time when the external water element is disturbed. It carries away villages, towns, cities, districts, and countries."
  16. ↑ Karunadasa, Y, "A Buddhist Analysis of Matter", Wisdom Publications, 2020, pages 613 and 638 "Most of the schools of Indian thought, notably the Sāṃkhya, the Vedānta, and the Medical Tradition as represented by Caraka and Suśruta, recognize five mahābhūtas, or elemental substances... In the Nikāyas they are defined in simple and general terms and are illustrated mostly with reference to the constituents of the human body. Earth-element is that which is hard (kakkhaḷa) and rigid (kharigata) —for example, hair of the head or body, nails, teeth, skin, flesh, etc. Water-element is water (āpo), or that which is watery (āpogataṃ) —for example, bile, phlegm, pus, blood, sweat, tears, etc. Fire-element is fire or heat (tejo), or that which is fiery (tejogataṃ) —for example, the heat in the body that transmutes food and drink in digestion. Air-element is air (vāyo), or that which is airy (vāyogataṃ) —for example, “wind discharged upward or downward, wind in the abdomen or belly, vapors that traverse the several members, inhaling and exhaling of breath.” These definitions seem to suggest that from its very beginning Buddhism did not make a radical departure from the popular conception of the mahābhūtas."
  17. ↑ Karunadasa, Y. A Buddhist Analysis of Matter, Wisdom Publications, 2020, page 149 "This theory ensures that the object of direct and immediate perception is not an object of mental interpretation but something that is ultimately real."
  18. ↑ Bodhi, Bhikkhu, A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma, Paryatti Publishing, 1993, page 3 "It is the dhammas alone that possess ultimate reality: determinate existence “from their own side” (sarupato) independent of the minds conceptual processing of the data. Such a conception of the nature of the real seems to be already implicit in the Sutta Pitaka, particularly in the Buddha’s disquisitions on the aggregates, sense bases, elements, dependent arising, etc.,…"
  19. ↑ Dan Lusthaus, Buddhist Phenomenology: A Philosophical Investigation of Yogācāra Buddhism and the Chʼeng Wei-shih Lun. Routledge, 2002, page 183.
  20. ↑ Dan Lusthaus, Buddhist Phenomenology: A Philosophical Investigation of Yogācāra Buddhism and the Chʼeng Wei-shih Lun. Routledge, 2002, page 184.
  21. ↑ Noa Ronkin, Early Buddhist Metaphysics the Making of a Philosophical Tradition. Routledge, 2005, page 56.
  22. ↑ Buddhist Philosophy Essential Readings, Edited by William Edelglass and Jay Garfield, Oxford Publications, 2009, Pages 309–319 "What sensible person would look at a passage from this same [Dasabhumikasutra] and imagine that consciousness exists as an independent thing (vastutah)? A notion like this is nothing more than dogmatic opinion. It follows that the expression "mind only" serves only to clarify that mind is the most significant element [in experience] This text should not be understood to assert that there is no objective form (rupa)." "One can certainly maintain that objective reality exists."
  23. ↑ Dan Lusthaus, "What is and isn't Yogacara." He specifically discusses early Buddhism as well as Yogacara. "What is and isn't Yogacara". http://www.acmuller.net/yogacara/articles/intro-uni.htm. .
  24. ↑ Walshe (1995), p. 338.
  25. ↑ B. Alan Wallace, The bridge of quiescence: experiencing Tibetan Buddhist meditation. Carus Publishing Company, 1998, page 257.
  26. ↑ Thanissaro (2003b).
  27. ↑ Thanissaro (2006).
  28. ↑ Thanissaro (1997c).
  29. ↑ Thanissaro (1997b).
  30. ↑ Thanissaro (1997a).
  31. ↑ Thanissaro (2003a).
  32. ↑ Bodhi (2000), pp. 645–50.
  33. ↑ Bodhi (2000), pp. 680–1; Thanissaro (2005).
  34. ↑ Bodhi (2000), pp. 891–2; Thanissaro (2001).
  35. ↑ Bodhi (2000), pp. 1237–9; Thanissaro (2004a).
  36. ↑ Bodhi (2000), pp. 1251–3; Thanissaro (1998).
  37. ↑ Bodhi (2000), p. 1806.
  38. ↑ Bodhi (2000), p. 697.
  39. ↑ Bodhi (2000), p. 1006; Thanissaro (2004b).
  40. ↑ Bodhi (2000), p. 1010
  41. ↑ Bodhi (2000), p. 1014; Thanissaro (1994).
  42. ↑ Thanissaro (1997).
  43. ↑ Buddhaghosa (1999), pp. 343ff.

Bibliography




Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Philosophy:Mahābhūta&oldid=3286379"