Astronomy:Deep Space 2

From HandWiki
Revision as of 12:41, 6 February 2024 by WikiG (talk | contribs) (over-write)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: NASA space probe part of the New Millennium Program
Deep Space 2
DS-2 probes with mounting.jpg
DS2 probe with heatshield and mounting
Mission typeLander / impactor
OperatorNASA / JPL
Websitenmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds2/
Mission duration1 Year 2 Months
Spacecraft properties
ManufacturerNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Launch mass2.4 kg (5.3 lb) each
Power300mW Li-SOCl2 batteries
Start of mission
Launch date20:21:10, January 3, 1999 (UTC) (1999-01-03T20:21:10Z)
RocketDelta II 7425
Launch siteCape Canaveral AFS SLC-17
End of mission
Disposalfailure in transit
Last contact20:00, December 3, 1999 (UTC) (1999-12-03T20:00Z)[1]
Mars impactor
Spacecraft componentAmundsen and Scott
Impact date~20:15 UTC ERT, December 3, 1999
Impact site [ ⚑ ] 73°S 210°W / 73°S 210°W / -73; -210 (Deep Space 2) (projected)
Transponders
BandS-band
Bandwidth8 kbit/s
M98patch.png
Mars Surveyor 98 mission logo  

Deep Space 2 was a NASA space probe, part of the New Millennium Program. It included two highly advanced miniature space probes that were sent to Mars aboard the Mars Polar Lander in January 1999.[1] The probes were named "Scott" and "Amundsen", in honor of Robert Falcon Scott and Roald Amundsen, the first explorers to reach the Earth's South Pole. Intended to be the first spacecraft to penetrate below the surface of another planet, after entering the Mars atmosphere DS2 was to detach from the Mars Polar Lander mother ship and plummet to the surface using only an aeroshell impactor, with no parachute. The mission was declared a failure on March 13, 2000, after all attempts to reestablish communications following the descent went unanswered.[2]

The Deep Space 2 development costs were US$28 million.[3]

Overview

thumbnail|Deep Space 2 project manager Sarah Gavit with the engineering hardware of the probe

Deep Space 2, also known as "Mars Microprobe,"[2] was the second spacecraft developed under the NASA New Millennium Program to flight-test advanced technologies concepts for space missions. The purpose of the program was to do high-risk technology demonstration, with a motto "Taking risks to reduce future danger."[4] The project was led and operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, with contributions from The University of Arizona, New Mexico State, Northern Arizona University, the Air Force Research Laboratory, and others.[5]

The Deep Space 2 mission was intended to do an engineering validation of the concept of a penetrator probe, impacting the planet at high velocity, instead of slowing down for a soft landing as done by the probes conventionally used for planetary exploration. The penetrator concept is potentially a lower-cost approach, and has a proposed advantage of giving access to the subsurface of the planet being studied (in this case, Mars.)

Though the primary objective was to validate the technology, the probes also had goals for science analysis at Mars. These goals were “1) to derive the atmospheric density, pressure, and temperature throughout the entire atmospheric column, 2) to characterize the hardness of the soil and possibly the presence of layers at a scale of tens of centimeters, 3) to determine if ice is present in the subsurface soil, and, 4) to estimate the thermal conductivity of the soil at depth.”[6] The eventual goal for such probes was to deploy networks “around a planet using no more resources than a single landing under conventional assumptions.”[7]

The probes were launched with the Mars Polar Lander on January 3, 1999, on a Delta II 7425 Launch Vehicle.

Spacecraft

Each probe[8][6] weighed 2.4 kg (5.3 lb) and was encased in a protective aeroshell. They rode to Mars aboard another spacecraft, the Mars Polar Lander.

Upon arrival near the south polar region of Mars on December 3, 1999,[1] the basketball-sized shells were released from the main spacecraft, plummeting through the atmosphere and hitting the planet's surface at over 179 m/s (590 ft/s). On impact, each shell was designed to shatter, and its grapefruit-sized probe was to punch through the soil and separate into two parts. The lower part, called the forebody, was designed to penetrate as far as 0.6 meters (2 ft 0 in) into the soil. It contained the primary science instrument on board, the Evolved Water Experiment.[6] The upper part of the probe, or aftbody, was designed to remain on the surface in order to transmit data through its UHF antenna to the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft in orbit around Mars. The Mars Global Surveyor would act as a relay in order to send the data collected back to Earth. The two sections of the probe were designed to remain connected via a data cable.[2]

Science Instruments

The probes are each equipped with five instruments to enable analysis of the atmosphere, surface, and subsurface.

• Descent accelerometer: The descent accelerometer was a commercially available sensor meant to measure accelerations from drag during descent. Its readings could “be used to derive a density profile of the Martian atmosphere” based on the acceleration data combined with knowledge of the probe's speed and ballistic coefficient.[9]

• Impact accelerometer: The impact accelerometer was built with a range of ±120,000 g for the large expected acceleration on impact with Mars’ surface.[9]

• Meteorological sensor: provides atmospheric pressure and temperature data at the landing site. This sensor was located on the back of the probe so that it would stay above the surface after impact. It was sampled and recorded by the telecommunications “which enables the acquisition of meteorological data in the event that the microcontroller failed during the impact.”[9]

• Soil Thermal Conductivity Temperature Sensors: Twin platinum resistor temperature sensors would determine rates of cooling in the forebody once submerged in the surface.[9]

• Evolved Water Experiment: A small sample collection system in the forebody would bring Martian regolith into a heating chamber. The sample would then be heated to allow spectroscopy measurements on the resulting vapor using a miniaturized tunable diode laser. The Evolved Water Experiment was the primary instrument on board the probe.[6]

New Technologies: High Impact and Low Temperature Electronics

Custom electronics and batteries were designed for the Deep Space 2 probes to survive extremely high accelerations on impact with the surface of Mars and the cold temperatures that it would experience once in operation. Both the electronics and the custom cells were required to survive an impact on the order of 80,000 g and operational temperatures as low at -80 °C.[10] Additionally, as much as a 30,000 g difference in acceleration was possible between the forebody and aftbody.[11]

Batteries

Together with Yardney Technical Products, JPL designed a battery with two non-rechargeable 6-14V cells using Lithium-Thionyl Chloride (LI-SOCl2) chemistry to survive the expected conditions. The batteries were impact tested and also thermally cycled during development.[11]

Electronics Packaging

Due to the probe's form factor and the harsh survivability conditions, JPL used novel techniques to secure the onboard electronics. The techniques included chip-on-board (COB) technology to improve packing density.[12] It also used a 1-meter flexible umbilical cable to connect the forebody penetrator that would be displaced upon impact. Mechanical (non-functioning) models were impact tested before launch to determine if the structures would survive.[12]

Mission failure

The probes reached Mars along with the Mars Polar Lander mission, apparently without incident, but communication was never established after impact. It is not known what the cause of failure was.

A failure review board was commissioned to report on the failures of the Mars Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 probes.[13] The review board was unable to identify a probable cause of failure,[14] but suggested several possible causes:

  • The probe radio equipment had a low chance of surviving the impact.
  • The batteries may have failed on impact.
  • The probes may have bounced on impact.
  • The probes may have landed on their sides, resulting in bad antenna performance or radio link geometry.
  • The probes may simply have hit ground that was too rocky for survival.

The board concluded that the probes and their components were not tested adequately before launch.[13][14]

  • Deep Space 2 penetrator

  • Deep Space 2 surface element

  • DS-2 entry aeroshell

  • Visualization of Deep Space 2 as deployed after penetration

  • DS2 functional animation

  • DS2 probe components

Aftermath

Despite the failures of Mars Polar Lander and the two Deep Space 2 probes, Planum Australe, which served as their exploration target,[15] would in later years be explored by European Space Agency's MARSIS radar, which examined and analyzed the site from Mars' orbit and even determined that the area had water beneath its vast area of ice.[16][17][18][19] Images which were obtained from MARSIS also determined that the water discovered beneath Planum Australe was in fact saltwater.[20][21]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Davis, Phil; Munsell, Kirk (January 23, 2009). "Missions to Mars: Deep Space 2 - Key Dates". Solar System Exploration. NASA. http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/profile.cfm?Sort=Target&Target=Mars&MCode=DS2. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 "Deep Space 2 (DEEPSP2)". NSSDC Master Catalog. NASA - National Space Science Data Center. 2000. https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action?id=DEEPSP2. 
  3. ↑ "Mars Polar Lander Mission Costs". The Associated Press. 1999-12-08. https://apnews.com/article/0520e4b6fa628215ee93b0d3c74d6ce2A. 
  4. ↑ Redd, Nola Taylor (February 12, 2019). "NASA's New Millennium Program: Taking Risks to Reduce Future Danger". Space.com.. https://www.space.com/new-millennium-program.html. 
  5. ↑ "1998 Mars Missions Press Kit". December 1998. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/press_kits/mars98launch.pdf. 
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Smrekar, Suzanne; Catling, David; Lorenz, Ralph; Magalhães, Julio; Moersch, Jeffrey; Morgan, Paul; Murray, Bruce; Presley, Marsha et al. (1999). "Deep Space 2: The Mars Microprobe Mission" (in en). Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 104 (E11): 27013–27030. doi:10.1029/1999JE001073. ISSN 2156-2202. Bibcode: 1999JGR...10427013S. 
  7. ↑ Hecht, Michael H. (1996-01-15). "Microinstruments and Micro Electromechanical Systems in Support of Earth and Space Science in the New Millennium" (in en-US). https://trs.jpl.nasa.gov/handle/2014/23645. 
  8. ↑ Gavit, Sarah A.; Powell, George (1996). "The new Millennium Program's Mars Microprobe Mission". Acta Astronautica 39 (1–4): 273–280. doi:10.1016/S0094-5765(96)00145-2. ISSN 0094-5765. Bibcode: 1996AcAau..39..273G. 
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Blue, R. C. (1998-04-27). "Mars Microprobe Project Instrumentation Package" (in en-US). https://trs.jpl.nasa.gov/handle/2014/19235. 
  10. ↑ Russell, P.G.; Carmen, D.; Marsh, C.; Reddy, T.B.; Bugga, R.; Deligiannis, F.; Frank, H.A. (1998). "Development of a lithium/thionyl chloride battery for the Mars Microprobe Program". IEEE. pp. 341–346. doi:10.1109/bcaa.1998.653891. ISBN 0-7803-4098-1. 
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Rutnakumar, B.; Frank, H.; Kindler, A.; Deligiannis, F.; Davies, E.; Blakevoort, J.; Surampudi, S. (1998-10-27) (in en-US). DS2 Mars Microprobe Battery. https://trs.jpl.nasa.gov/handle/2014/20612. 
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Arakaki, G.; D'Agostino, S. (March 1999). "New Millennium DS2 electronic packaging an advanced electronic packaging "sandbox"". 2. pp. 205–213. doi:10.1109/AERO.1999.793162. Cat. No.99TH8403. ISBN 0-7803-5425-7. Bibcode: 1999aero....2..205A. 
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 "Report on the Loss of the Mars Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 Missions". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. March 22, 2000. ftp://ftp.hq.nasa.gov/pub/pao/reports/2000/2000_mpl_report_1.pdf. 
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Young, Thomas (March 14, 2000). "Testimony of Thomas Young, Chairman of the Mars Program Independent Assessment Team before the House Science Committee" (Press release). Draft #7 3/13/00. House Science and Technology Committee. Retrieved April 22, 2009.
  15. ↑ Evans, Ben (2019). "'Could Not Have Survived': 20 Years Since NASA's Ill-Fated Mars Polar Lander". AmericaSpace. https://www.americaspace.com/2019/01/06/could-not-have-survived-20-years-since-nasas-ill-fated-mars-polar-lander/. Retrieved 15 April 2022. 
  16. ↑ Orosei, R. (25 July 2018). "Radar evidence of subglacial liquid water on Mars". Science 361 (6401): 490–493. doi:10.1126/science.aar7268. PMID 30045881. Bibcode: 2018Sci...361..490O. 
  17. ↑ Chang, Kenneth; Overbye, Dennis (25 July 2018). "A Watery Lake Is Detected on Mars, Raising the Potential for Alien Life - The discovery suggests that watery conditions beneath the icy southern polar cap may have provided one of the critical building blocks for life on the red planet.". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/science/mars-liquid-alien-life.html. 
  18. ↑ "Huge reservoir of liquid water detected under the surface of Mars". EurekAlert. 25 July 2018. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-07/aaft-hro072318.php. 
  19. ↑ "Liquid water 'lake' revealed on Mars". BBC News. 25 July 2018. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44952710. 
  20. ↑ Lauro, Sebastian Emanuel (28 September 2020). "Multiple subglacial water bodies below the south pole of Mars unveiled by new MARSIS data". Nature Astronomy 5: 63–70. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1200-6. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-020-1200-6. Retrieved 15 April 2022. 
  21. ↑ O'Callaghan, Jonathan (28 September 2020). "Water on Mars: discovery of three buried lakes intrigues scientists - Researchers have detected a group of lakes hidden under the red planet's icy surface.". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02751-1. PMID 32989309. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02751-1. Retrieved 15 April 2022. 

Bibliography

External links

  • Archived JPL Deep Space 2 website (original website no longer exists)
  • Report of the Loss of the Mars Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 Missions
    • (Part 1) (see page 10 of report (page 22 of this PDF) for the findings of the Deep Space 2 investigation)
    • (Part 2)
    • (Part 3)
    • (Part 4)
    • (Part 5) (see page 124 of report (page 1 of this PDF) for Deep Space 2 possible failure modes)



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Astronomy:Deep_Space_2&oldid=3355117"