Biology:Proboscidea

From HandWiki
Short description: Order of elephant-like mammals

Proboscidea
Temporal range: Middle Paleocene-Holocene 60.0–0 Ma
Elephant Diversity.jpg
Proboscidean diversity: Indian elephant, Elephas maximus indicus, African bush elephant, Loxodonta africana and African forest elephant, Loxodonta cyclotis
Moeritherium sp.jpg
Skeleton of Moeritherium
Scientific classification e
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Mirorder: Tethytheria
Order: Proboscidea
Illiger, 1811
Subclades

Proboscidea (/ˌprɒbəˈsɪdiə/; from la proboscis, from grc προβοσκίς (proboskís) 'elephant's trunk') is a taxonomic order of afrotherian mammals containing one living family (Elephantidae) and several extinct families. First described by J. Illiger in 1811, it encompasses the elephants and their close relatives.[1] Proboscideans include some of the largest known land mammals. The largest land mammal of all time may have been a proboscidean; the elephant Palaeoloxodon namadicus has been estimated to be up to 5.2 m (17.1 ft) at the shoulder and may have weighed up to 22 t (24.3 short tons), surpassing the paraceratheres, the otherwise largest known land mammals, though this estimate was made based on a single fragmentary femur and is speculative.[2] The largest extant proboscidean is the African bush elephant, with a record of size of 4 m (13.1 ft) at the shoulder and 10.4 t (11.5 short tons).[2] In addition to their enormous size, later proboscideans are distinguished by tusks and long, muscular trunks, which were less developed or absent in early proboscideans.

Three species of elephant are currently recognised: the African bush elephant, the African forest elephant, and the Asian elephant. Elephantidae is the only surviving family of the order Proboscidea; extinct members include the mastodons, gomphotheres and stegodonts. The family Elephantidae also contains several extinct groups, including the mammoths and straight-tusked elephants. The distinctive features of proboscideans include a trunk, tusks, and massive legs. Large ear flaps are present in some proboscideans, including elephants. Some also have tough but sensitive skin; others, like the woolly mammoth, have a coat. The trunk is used for breathing, bringing food and water to the mouth, and grasping objects. Tusks, which are derived from the incisor teeth, serve both as weapons and as tools for moving objects and digging. The large ear flaps assist in maintaining a constant body temperature as well as in communication. The pillar-like legs carry their great weight.

Evolution

Over 180 extinct members of Proboscidea have been described.[3] The earliest proboscideans, Eritherium and Phosphatherium are known from the late Paleocene of Africa.[4] The Eocene included Numidotherium, Moeritherium and Barytherium from Africa. These animals were relatively small and some, like Moeritherium and Barytherium were probably amphibious.[5][6] Later on, genera such as Phiomia and Palaeomastodon arose; the latter likely inhabited more forested areas. Proboscidean diversification changed little during the Oligocene.[5]

A major event in proboscidean evolution was the collision of Afro-Arabia with Eurasia, during the Early Miocene, around 18-19 million years ago allowing proboscideans to disperse from their African homeland across Eurasia, and later, around 16-15 million years ago into North America across the Bering Land Bridge. Proboscidean groups prominent during the Miocene include the deinotheres, along with the more advanced elephantimorphs, including mammutids (mastodons), gomphotheres, amebelodontids (which includes the "shovel tuskers" like Platybelodon), choerolophodontids and stegodontids.[7] Around 10 million years ago, the earliest members of the family Elephantidae emerged in Africa, having originated from gomphotheres.[8] The Late Miocene saw major climatic changes, which resulted in the decline and extinction of many proboscidean groups such as amebelodontids and choerolophodontids.[7] The earliest members of modern genera of Elephantidae appeared during the latest Miocene-early Pliocene around 5 million years ago. The elephantid genera Elephas (which includes the living Asian elephant) and Mammuthus (mammoths) migrated out of Africa during the late Pliocene, around 3.6 to 3.2 million years ago.[9]

Over the course of the Early Pleistocene, all non-elephantid probobscideans outside of the Americas became extinct (including mammutids, gomphotheres and deinotheres), with the exception of Stegodon.[7] Gomphotheres dispersed into South America during this era as part of the Great American interchange,[10] and mammoths migrating into North America around 1.5 million years ago.[11] At the end of the Early Pleistocene, around 800,000 years ago the elephantid genus Palaeoloxodon dispersed outside of Africa, becoming widely distributed in Eurasia.[12] Proboscideans underwent a dramatic decline during the Late Pleistocene, with all remaining non-elephantid proboscideans (including Stegodon, mastodons, and the gomphotheres Cuvieronius and Notiomastodon) and Palaeoloxodon becoming extinct, with mammoths only surviving in relict populations on islands around the Bering Strait into the Holocene, with their latest survival being on Wrangel Island around 4,000 years ago.[7][13]

The following cladogram is based on endocasts[14]

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1.

Morphology

Proboscideans experienced several evolutionary trends, such as an increase in size, which led to many giant species that stood over Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1. tall, and body masses of over 10 tonnes.[15] As with other megaherbivores, including the extinct sauropod dinosaurs, the large size of proboscideans likely developed to allow them to survive on vegetation with low nutritional value.[16] Their limbs grew longer and the feet shorter and broader.[17] The feet were originally plantigrade and developed into a digitigrade stance with cushion pads and the sesamoid bone providing support, with this change developing around the common ancestor of Deinotheriidae and Elephantiformes.[18]

The skull grew larger, especially the cranium, while the neck shortened to provide better support for the skull. The increase in size led to the development and elongation of the mobile trunk to provide reach. The number of premolars, incisors and canines decreased. The cheek teeth (molars and premolars) became larger and more specialised.[17] In Elephantiformes, the second upper incisor and lower incisor were transformed into ever growing tusks.[19][20] The tusks are proportionally heavy for their size, being primarily composed of dentine. In primitive proboscideans, a band of enamel covers part of the tusk surface, though in many later groups including modern elephants the band is lost, with elephants only having enamel on the tusk tips of juveniles. The upper tusks were initially modest in size, but from the Late Miocene onwards proboscideans developed increasingly large tusks, with the longest ever recorded tusk being Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1. long belonging to "Mammut" borsoni found in Greece, with some mammoth tusks likely weighing over Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1.. The lower tusks are generally smaller than the upper tusks, but could grow to large sizes in some species, like in Deinotherium (which lacks upper tusks), where they could grow over Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1. long, the amebelodontid Konobelodon has lower tusks Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1. long, with the longest lower tusks ever recorded being from the primitive elephantid Stegotetrabelodon which are around Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1. long.[21]

The molar teeth changed from being replaced vertically as in other mammals to being replaced horizontally in the clade Elephantimorpha.[22] While early Elephantimorpha generally had lower jaws with an elongated mandibular symphysis at the front of the jaw with well developed lower tusks/incisors, from the Late Miocene onwards, many groups convergently developed brevirostrine (shortened) lower jaws with vestigial or no lower tusks.[23][24] Elephantids are distinguished from earlier proboscideans by a major shift in the molar morphology to parallel lophs rather than the cusps of earlier proboscideans, allowing them to become higher crowned (hypsodont) and more efficient in consuming grass.[25]

Dwarfism

Main page: Biology:Dwarf elephant
Skeleton of Palaeoloxodon falconeri, one of the smallest known dwarf elephants, with an adult shoulder height less than Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1.

Several species of proboscideans lived on islands and experienced insular dwarfism. This occurred primarily during the Pleistocene, when some elephant populations became isolated by fluctuating sea levels, although dwarf elephants did exist earlier in the Pliocene. These elephants likely grew smaller on islands due to a lack of large or viable predator populations and limited resources. By contrast, small mammals such as rodents develop gigantism in these conditions. Dwarf proboscideans are known to have lived in Indonesia, the Channel Islands of California, and several islands of the Mediterranean.[26]

Elephas celebensis of Sulawesi is believed to have descended from Elephas planifrons. Elephas falconeri of Malta and Sicily was only Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1., and had probably evolved from the straight-tusked elephant. Other descendants of the straight-tusked elephant existed in Cyprus. Dwarf elephants of uncertain descent lived in Crete, Cyclades and Dodecanese, while dwarf mammoths are known to have lived in Sardinia.[26] The Columbian mammoth colonised the Channel Islands and evolved into the pygmy mammoth. This species reached a height of Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1. and weighed Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1.. A population of small woolly mammoths survived on Wrangel Island as recently as 4,000 years ago.[26] After their discovery in 1993, they were considered dwarf mammoths.[27] This classification has been re-evaluated and since the Second International Mammoth Conference in 1999, these animals are no longer considered to be true "dwarf mammoths".[28]

Classification

Below is an unranked taxonomy of proboscidean genera as of 2019.[29][30][31][32]

References

  1. Illiger, Johann Karl Wilhelm (1811). Prodromus Systematis Mammalium et Avium: Additis Terminis Zoographicis Utriusque Classis, Eorumque Versione Germanica. Berolini: Sumptibus C. Salfeld. p. 62. https://archive.org/details/caroliilligerida00illi. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Larramendi, A. (2016). "Shoulder height, body mass and shape of proboscideans". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61. doi:10.4202/app.00136.2014. https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app61/app001362014.pdf. 
  3. Kingdon, Jonathan (2013). Mammals of Africa. Bloomsbury. p. 173. ISBN 9781408189962. https://books.google.com/books?id=B_07noCPc4kC. Retrieved 6 June 2020. 
  4. Gheerbrant, E. (2009). "Paleocene emergence of elephant relatives and the rapid radiation of African ungulates". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (26): 10717–10721. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900251106. PMID 19549873. Bibcode2009PNAS..10610717G. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Sukumar, pp. 13–16.
  6. Liu, Alexander G. S. C.; Seiffert, Erik R.; Simons, Elwyn L. (2008-04-15). "Stable isotope evidence for an amphibious phase in early proboscidean evolution" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (15): 5786–5791. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800884105. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 18413605. Bibcode2008PNAS..105.5786L. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Cantalapiedra, Juan L.; Sanisidro, Óscar; Zhang, Hanwen; Alberdi, María T.; Prado, José L.; Blanco, Fernando; Saarinen, Juha (2021-07-01). "The rise and fall of proboscidean ecological diversity" (in en). Nature Ecology & Evolution 5 (9): 1266–1272. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01498-w. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 34211141. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-021-01498-w. 
  8. H. Saegusa, H. Nakaya, Y. Kunimatsu, M. Nakatsukasa, H. Tsujikawa, Y. Sawada, M. Saneyoshi, T. Sakai Earliest elephantid remains from the late Miocene locality, Nakali, Kenya Scientific Annals, School of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece VIth International Conference on Mammoths and Their Relatives, vol. 102, Grevena -Siatista, special volume (2014), p. 175
  9. Iannucci, Alessio; Sardella, Raffaele (2023-02-28). "What Does the "Elephant-Equus" Event Mean Today? Reflections on Mammal Dispersal Events around the Pliocene-Pleistocene Boundary and the Flexible Ambiguity of Biochronology" (in en). Quaternary 6 (1): 16. doi:10.3390/quat6010016. ISSN 2571-550X. 
  10. Mothé, Dimila; dos Santos Avilla, Leonardo; Asevedo, Lidiane; Borges-Silva, Leon; Rosas, Mariane; Labarca-Encina, Rafael; Souberlich, Ricardo; Soibelzon, Esteban et al. (30 September 2016). "Sixty years after 'The mastodonts of Brazil': The state of the art of South American proboscideans (Proboscidea, Gomphotheriidae)". Quaternary International 443: 52–64. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.028. Bibcode2017QuInt.443...52M. http://bibdigital.epn.edu.ec/bitstream/15000/17075/1/Moth%c3%a9%20et%20al.%2c%202016%20-%20Sixty%20years%20proboscideans.pdf. 
  11. Lister, A. M.; Sher, A. V. (2015-11-13). "Evolution and dispersal of mammoths across the Northern Hemisphere" (in en). Science 350 (6262): 805–809. doi:10.1126/science.aac5660. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 26564853. Bibcode2015Sci...350..805L. 
  12. Lister, Adrian M. (2004), "Ecological Interactions of Elephantids in Pleistocene Eurasia", Human Paleoecology in the Levantine Corridor (Oxbow Books): pp. 53–60, ISBN 978-1-78570-965-4, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264788794, retrieved 2020-04-14 
  13. Rogers, Rebekah L.; Slatkin, Montgomery (2017-03-02). Barsh, Gregory S.. ed. "Excess of genomic defects in a woolly mammoth on Wrangel island" (in en). PLOS Genetics 13 (3): e1006601. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006601. ISSN 1553-7404. PMID 28253255. 
  14. Benoit, Julien; Lyras, George A.; Schmitt, Arnaud; Nxumalo, Mpilo; Tabuce, Rodolphe; Obada, Teodor; Mararsecul, Vladislav; Manger, Paul (2023), Dozo, María Teresa; Paulina-Carabajal, Ariana; Macrini, Thomas E. et al., eds., "Paleoneurology of the Proboscidea (Mammalia, Afrotheria): Insights from Their Brain Endocast and Labyrinth" (in en), Paleoneurology of Amniotes (Cham: Springer International Publishing): pp. 579–644, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13983-3_15, ISBN 978-3-031-13982-6, https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-13983-3_15, retrieved 2023-05-22 
  15. Larramendi A (2015). "Shoulder height, body mass and shape of proboscideans". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. doi:10.4202/app.00136.2014. 
  16. Carpenter, K. (2006). "Biggest of the big: a critical re-evaluation of the mega-sauropod Amphicoelias fragillimus Cope, 1878". in Foster, J.R.. Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin. 36. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 131–138. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 Shoshani, J. (1998). "Understanding proboscidean evolution: a formidable task". Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13 (12): 480–87. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01491-8. PMID 21238404. 
  18. Hutchinson, J. R.; Delmer, C.; Miller, C. E.; Hildebrandt, T.; Pitsillides, A. A.; Boyde, A. (2011). "From flat foot to fat foot: structure, ontogeny, function, and evolution of elephant 'sixth toes'". Science 334 (6063): 1699–1703. doi:10.1126/science.1211437. PMID 22194576. Bibcode2011Sci...334R1699H. https://researchonline.rvc.ac.uk/id/eprint/5612/1/5612.pdf. Retrieved 3 January 2023. 
  19. Ferretti, Marco P. (March 2008). "Enamel Structure of Cuvieronius hyodon (Proboscidea, Gomphotheriidae) with a Discussion on Enamel Evolution in Elephantoids" (in en). Journal of Mammalian Evolution 15 (1): 37–58. doi:10.1007/s10914-007-9057-3. ISSN 1064-7554. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10914-007-9057-3. 
  20. Delmer, Cyrille (December 2009). "Reassessment of the Generic Attribution of Numidotherium savagei and the Homologies of Lower Incisors in Proboscideans" (in en). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54 (4): 561–580. doi:10.4202/app.2007.0036. ISSN 0567-7920. http://www.app.pan.pl/article/item/app20070036.html. 
  21. Larramendi, Asier (2023-12-10). "Estimating tusk masses in proboscideans: a comprehensive analysis and predictive model" (in en). Historical Biology: 1–14. doi:10.1080/08912963.2023.2286272. ISSN 0891-2963. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912963.2023.2286272. 
  22. Sanders, William J. (2018-02-17). "Horizontal tooth displacement and premolar occurrence in elephants and other elephantiform proboscideans" (in en). Historical Biology 30 (1–2): 137–156. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1297436. ISSN 0891-2963. Bibcode2018HBio...30..137S. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912963.2017.1297436. 
  23. Mothé, Dimila; Ferretti, Marco P.; Avilla, Leonardo S. (12 January 2016). "The Dance of Tusks: Rediscovery of Lower Incisors in the Pan-American Proboscidean Cuvieronius hyodon Revises Incisor Evolution in Elephantimorpha". PLOS ONE 11 (1): e0147009. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147009. PMID 26756209. Bibcode2016PLoSO..1147009M. 
  24. Li, Chunxiao; Deng, Tao; Wang, Yang; Sun, Fajun; Wolff, Burt; Jiangzuo, Qigao; Ma, Jiao; Xing, Luda et al. (2023-08-16) (in en). Longer mandible or nose? Co-evolution of feeding organs in early elephantiforms (Report). Paleontology. doi:10.1101/2023.08.15.553347. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2023.08.15.553347. 
  25. Lister, Adrian M. (2013-06-26). "The role of behaviour in adaptive morphological evolution of African proboscideans". Nature 500 (7462): 331–334. doi:10.1038/nature12275. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 23803767. Bibcode2013Natur.500..331L. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12275. 
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 Sukumar, pp. 31–33.
  27. Vartanyan, S. L., Garutt, V. E., Sher, A. V. (1993). "Holocene dwarf mammoths from Wrangel Island in the Siberian Arctic". Nature 362 (6418): 337–40. doi:10.1038/362337a0. PMID 29633990. Bibcode1993Natur.362..337V. 
  28. Tikhonov, A.; Agenbroad, L.; Vartanyan, S. (2003). "Comparative analysis of the mammoth populations on Wrangel Island and the Channel Islands". Deinsea 9: 415–20. ISSN 0923-9308. 
  29. Shoshani, Jeheskel; Pascal Tassy (2005). "Advances in proboscidean taxonomy & classification, anatomy & physiology, and ecology & behavior". Quaternary International 126–128: 5–20. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2004.04.011. Bibcode2005QuInt.126....5S. 
  30. Wang, Shi-Qi; Deng, Tao; Ye, Jie; He, Wen; Chen, Shan-Qin (2017). "Morphological and ecological diversity of Amebelodontidae (Proboscidea, Mammalia) revealed by a Miocene fossil accumulation of an upper-tuskless proboscidean". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 15 (8): 601–615. doi:10.1080/14772019.2016.1208687. Bibcode2017JSPal..15..601W. 
  31. Mothé, Dimila; Ferretti, Marco P.; Avilla, Leonardo S. (12 January 2016). "The Dance of Tusks: Rediscovery of Lower Incisors in the Pan-American Proboscidean Cuvieronius hyodon Revises Incisor Evolution in Elephantimorpha". PLOS ONE 11 (1): e0147009. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147009. PMID 26756209. Bibcode2016PLoSO..1147009M. 
  32. Tabuce, Rodolphe; Sarr, Raphaël; Adnet, Sylvain; Lebrun, Renaud; Lihoreau, Fabrice; Martin, Jeremy; Sambou, Bernard; Thiam, Mustapha et al. (2019). "Filling a gap in the proboscidean fossil record: a new genus from the Lutetian of Senegal". Journal of Paleontology 94 (3): 580–588. doi:10.1017/jpa.2019.98. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02408861/file/Tabuce-Saloumia.pdf. 

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1.

Bibliography


Wikidata ☰ Q26308 entry


Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter exited with status 1.