Engineering:Chemical cartridge

From HandWiki
Short description: Container that cleans pollution from air inhaled through it
Combined gas and particulate respirator filter for protection against acid gases, the type of BKF (БКФ). It has a transparent body and special sorbent that changes color after saturation. This color change may be used for timely replacement of respirators' filters, as an end-of-service-life indicator (ESLI).

A respirator cartridge or canister is a type of filter that removes gases, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and other vapors from air through adsorption, absorption, or chemisorption. It is one of two basic types of filters used by air-purifying respirators. The other is a mechanical filter, which removes only particulates. Hybrid filters combine the two.

Workplace air that is polluted with fine particulate matter or noxious gases but that contains enough oxygen (in the US, this is ruled to be a concentration above 19.5%; in the Russian Federation, above 18%[citation needed]), can be rendered safe via air-purifying respirators. Cartridges are of different types, and must be chosen correctly and replaced on an appropriate schedule.[1][2]

Purification methods

Absorption

Capturing noxious gases may be accomplished by sorbents.[3] These materials (activated carbon, aluminium oxide, zeolite, etc.) have a large specific surface area and can absorb many gases. Typically, such sorbents are in the form of granules, and fill the cartridge. Contaminated air travels through the cartridge's bed of sorbent granules. Movable harmful gas molecules collide with the surface of the sorbent and remain therein. The sorbent gradually saturates and loses its ability to capture pollutants. The bond strength between captured molecules and the sorbent is small, and molecules can separate from the sorbent and return to the air. The sorbent's ability to capture gases depends on the properties of the gases and their concentrations, including air temperature and relative humidity.[4]

Chemisorption

Chemisorption utilizes a chemical reaction between the gas and the absorber. The ability of some harmful gases to react chemically with other substances can be used to capture them. Creating strong links between gas molecules and a sorbent may allow repeated use of a canister if it has enough unsaturated sorbent. Copper salts, for example, can form complex compounds with ammonia.[3] A mixture of copper ions (+2), zinc carbonate, and TEDA can detoxify hydrogen cyanide.[5] By saturating activated carbon with chemicals, chemisorption can be used to help the material make stronger ties with molecules of trapped gases and improve the capture of harmful gases. Saturation of iodine improves mercury capture, saturation of metal salts improves ammonia capture, and saturation of metal oxides improves acid gas capture.[6][4]

Catalytic decomposition

Some harmful gases can be neutralized through catalytic oxidation. A hopcalite can oxidize toxic carbon monoxide (CO) into harmless carbon dioxide (CO2). The effectiveness of this catalyst strongly decreases as relative humidity increases. Therefore, desiccants are often added. Air always contains water vapor, and after saturation of the desiccant, the catalyst ceases to function.

Combined cartridges

Combined, or multi-gas cartridges protect from harmful gases by using multiple sorbents or catalysts. An example is ASZM-TEDA Carbon used in CBRN masks by the US Army. This is a form of activated carbon saturated with copper, zinc, silver, and molybdenum compounds, as well as with triethylenediamine (TEDA).[5]

Classification and marking

Cartridge selection comes after assessing the atmosphere. NIOSH guides cartridge choice in the US[7] along with manufacturer recommendations.

United States

In the US, approval for respirator cartridge particulate filtration efficiency classification and certification is administered by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) as part of Part 84 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (42 CFR 84).[8] Manufacturers can certify cartridges intended for purifying workplace air from various gaseous contaminants.[9]

Orange can be used for painting the entire cartridge housing, or as a strip. But this color is not in the table, and determining the cartridge's protection requires reading the inscription.[citation needed]

Legislation requires the employer to select cartridges using only labels (not color markings).[citation needed]

European Union and Russia

In the European Union (EU) and the Russian Federation (RF),[11][12][13][14][15] manufacturers can certify cartridges intended for cleaning the air of various gaseous contaminants. The codes are covered by EN14387, additionally particulate codes P1, P2 and P3 are used. For example, A1P2 is the code for commonly used filters in industry and agriculture that provide protection against A-type gases and commonly occurring particulates.

Cartridges AX, SX, and NO not distinguish on the sorption capacity (as in the US) when they are classified and certified.

If the cartridge is designed to protect from several different types of harmful gases, the label will list all designations in order. For example: A2B1, color - brown and grey.

Other jurisdictions that use this style of classification include Australia/New Zealand (AS/NZS 1716:2012) and China (GB 2890:2009).

Detection of end of service life

End-of-service-life indicator (ESLI). Saturation of sorbent mercury vapor leads to a color change (circle visible at the center of cartridge surface) from orange to brown.

Service lives of all types of cartridges are limited, therefore, the employer is obliged to replace them in a timely manner.

Old methods

Subjective reactions of users' sensory systems

The use of cartridges in the contaminated atmosphere leads to saturation of the sorbent (or the dryer — when using catalysts). The concentration of harmful gases in the purified air gradually increases. The ingress of harmful gases in the inhaled air can lead to a reaction in a user's sensory system: odor, taste, irritation of the respiratory system, dizziness, headaches, and other health impairments up to the loss of consciousness.[17]

These signs (known in the US as "warning properties" - p. 28[17]) indicate that one must leave the polluted workplace area, and replace the cartridge with a new one. This can also be a symptom of a loose fit the mask to one's face and the leakage of unfiltered air through the gaps between the mask and the face. Historically, this method is the oldest.

Respirator cartridge (3M 6009) for protection against mercury vapor and chlorine. This cartridge has an indicator that progressively changes color (from yellow to black, 1-2-3-4) when it is exposed to mercury vapor.

The advantages of this method – if harmful gases have warning properties at concentrations less than 1 PEL, the replacement will be produced on time (in most cases, at least); the application of this method does not require the use of special cartridges (more expensive) and accessories; replacement happens when one needs to do it – after the sorbent saturation, and without any calculations; the sorption capacity of the cartridges is fully expired (which reduces costs for respiratory protection).

The disadvantage of this method is that some harmful gases have no warning properties. For example, there is a list of over 500 harmful gases in the Respirator Selection Guide[18] and over 60 of them have no warning properties, and there is no such information for over 100 of them. So, if one uses warning properties to replace cartridges, this may lead to breathing air with an excess harmful gas concentration in some cases.

Comparison of odor thresholds and Occupational exposure limits (short term) for several substances
Gases and vapors (CAS) Short term PEL,[19] mg/m3 Odor thresholds, mg/m3
3M Russia[20] Maximum and minimum[21][22]
Heptane (142-82-5) 900 40.7 3000 - 1.7
Methyl acetate (79-20-9) 100 19 8628 - 0.5
Dichloromethane (75-09-2) 100 3.41 1530 - 4.1
Tetrahydrofuran (109-99-9) 100 11.39 180 - 0.27
Cyclohexane (110-82-7) 80 293 2700 - 1.8
Trichloroethene (79-01-6) 30 7.43 900 - 2.5
Tetrachlorethylene (127-18-4) 30 42.53 480 - 8.1
2-Ethoxyethanol (110-80-5) 30 4.57 180 - 1.1
Carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5) 20 260.3 3700 - 10.6
Chloroform (67-66-3) 10 61 6900 - 0.5
Benzene (71-43-2) 15 29.7 1000 - 2.5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (79-34-5) 5 1.46 50 - 1.6
Allyl alcohol (107-18-6) 2 1.16 83 - 1.2
Epichlorohydrin (106-89-8) 2 3.59 46 - 0.3
Hydrocyanic acid (74-90-8) 0.3 0.72 6 - 0.01
Phosphine (7803-51-2) 0.1 0.198 7 - 0.014
Chlorine (7782-50-5) 1 no information 14,3 - 0,06

According to the ICHS, all listed substances in the table cannot be reliably detected by smell at dangerous concentrations. On the other hand, all publications with information only about average odor perception thresholds can partly misinform the reader, since they create the impression that the thresholds are stable and constant.[21]

If the threshold odor of Benzene is 20 PEL; and if its concentration is only 10 PEL, one cannot timely change cartridges by using smell - they could be "used" forever, but they cannot protect forever.

The practice has shown that the presence of warning properties does not always lead to timely cartridge replacement.[23] A study[24] showed that on average 95% of a group of people have an individual threshold of olfactory sensitivity in the range of from 1/16 to 16 from the mean. This means that 2.5% of people will not be able to smell harmful gases at a concentration 16 times greater than the average threshold of perception of a smell. The threshold of sensitivity of different people can vary by two orders of magnitude. That is, 15% of people do not smell at concentrations four times higher than the sensitivity threshold. The value of threshold smell greatly depends on how much attention people pay to it, and on their health status.

The sensitivity may be reduced, for example, due to colds and other ailments. It turns out that a worker's ability to detect smell also depends on the nature of the work to be performed — if it requires concentration, a user may not react to the smell. Prolonged exposure to harmful gases (for example, hydrogen sulfide) at low concentrations can create olfactory fatigue which reduces sensitivity. In a group of workers, the average styrene odor threshold increased by an order of magnitude due to adaptation. But the perception of odors of other substances did not change. And the workers could mistakenly believe that their olfactory organ remained sensitive to styrene too.[25]

This was the reason for the ban to use this method of cartridge replacement in the US since 1996 (the Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA standard).[17]

Mass increase

To protect workers from carbon monoxide cartridges often use the catalyst hopcalite. This catalyst does not change its properties over time of use, but when it moistened, the degree of protection may be significantly reduced. Because water vapor is always present in the air, the polluted air is dehumidified in the cartridge (for use of the catalyst). Since the mass of water vapor in the polluted air is greater than the mass of harmful gases, trapping moisture from the air leads to a significantly higher increase in the mass of cartridges than the trapping gases. This is a substantial difference, and it can be used to determine whether to continue to use gas cartridges further without replacement. The cartridge is weighed, and a decision can be made based on the magnitude of increase of its mass. For example, the book[26] describes gas cartridges (model "СО"), which were replaced after a weight gain (relative to initial) of 50 grams.

Other methods

The documents[26][27] described Soviet cartridges (model "Г"), designed to protect from mercury. Their service life was limited to 100 hours of use (cartridges without particle filter), or 60 hours of use (cartridges with particle filter), after which it was necessary to replace the cartridge with a new one.

The documents[28][29] describe a non-destructive way to determine the remaining service life of new and used gas cartridges. Polluted air was pumped through the cartridge. The degree of purification of air depends on how much-unsaturated sorbent is in the cartridge, therefore, accurate measurement of gas concentration in the cleaned air allows one to estimate the amount of the unsaturated sorbent. Polluted air (1-bromobutane) was pumped for a very short time, and therefore, such tests do not reduce the service life considerably. The sorption capacity decreased due to absorption of this gas by about 0.5% of the sorption capacity of a new cartridge. The method was also used for 100% quality control of the cartridges manufactured by the English firm Martindale Protection Co. (10 microliters 1-bromobutane injected into the air stream), and to check the cartridges issued to workers in firms Waring, Ltd. and Rentokil, Ltd. This method was used in the Chemical Defence Establishment in the early 1970s. The experts who developed this method, received a patent.[30]

The document[31] briefly describes two methods to objectively evaluate the degree of saturation of the sorbent in the cartridges. It recommends using spectral and microchemical methods. The spectral method is based on determining the presence of harmful substances in the cartridge by sampling, with subsequent analysis on a special device (стилоскоп - on Russian). A microchemical method is based on a layer-by-layer determination of the presence of harmful substances in the sorbent by sampling with subsequent analysis by chemical method. If the air is contaminated with the most toxic substances, the book recommends to limit the further duration of cartridge use, and it recommended to apply the spectral method (arsine and phosphine, phosgene, fluorine, organochloride, organometallic compounds), and microchemical methods (hydrogen cyanide, cyanogens).

Unfortunately, in both cases, there is no description of how to extract a sample of the sorbent from the cartridge housing (the housing is usually not detachable), and use the cartridge after this test, if the test shows that it does not have a lot of saturated sorbents.

Modern methods

Sensors for an end-of-service-life indicator (ESLI) developed in US

Cartridge certification provides a minimum value of their sorption capacity. US OSHA standard for 1,3-Butadiene indicates the specific service life of the cartridges.[32]

Laboratory testing

If the company has a laboratory with the right equipment, specialists can skip the contaminated air through the cartridge and determine the degree of cleaning needed. This method enables one to determine the service life in an environment where the air is contaminated with a mixture of different substances that affect their capture with a sorbent (one affecting another capture). Service life calculation methods for such conditions have been developed relatively recently. However, this requires accurate information on concentrations of noxious substances, and they often are not permanent.

Tests in laboratories can identify the balance of service life of cartridges after their use. If the remainder is large, similar cartridges in such circumstances can be used over a longer period of time. In some cases, a large balance allows the use of cartridges repeatedly. This method does not require accurate information on the concentrations of harmful substances. The cartridge replacement schedule is drawn upon the basis of the results of their testing in the laboratory. This method has a serious drawback. The company must have complex and expensive equipment and trained professionals to use it, which is not always possible. According to a poll,[33] cartridges replacement in the US was carried out on the basis of laboratory tests in approximately 5% of all organizations.

Research to determine whether it is possible to calculate the service life of respirator cartridges (if one know the conditions of their use) have been conducted in developed countries since the 1970s. This allows one to replace cartridges in a timely fashion without the use of sophisticated and expensive equipment.

Computer programs

The world's leading respirator manufacturers offered customers computer programs for calculating the service life already in the year 2000.

3M program[37] allowed to calculate the service life of the cartridges exposed with more than 900 harmful gases and their combinations in 2013. The MSA program[38] enables taking into account hundreds of gases and their combinations. The same program was developed by Scott[41] and Dragerwerk.[42] J. Wood developed a mathematical model and software which now allows one to calculate the service life of any cartridges with known properties.[43][44] Now OSHA uses it in its Advisor Genius program.[45]

The merit of this way of replacing the cartridges is that it allows an employer to use normal, "common" cartridges, and if they have the exact data, they may replace them in time. The downside is that because of air contamination is often not constant, and the nature of the work to be performed is not always stable (that is, the flow of air through the cartridges is not permanent), it is recommended to use working conditions for calculations, equal to the worst case, for reliable protection. But in all other cases, cartridges will be replaced with a partially used sorbent. This increases the costs of respiratory protection due to more frequent cartridges replacement.

In addition, calculation accuracy is reduced under very high relative humidity, because the mathematical model does not take into account some of the physical effects in such cases.

End-of-service-life indicators

A half-mask respirator with cartridges with end-of-service-life indicators (ESLI) placed to be visible during operation. The color change indicates that the cartridge will cease to capture ammonia and must be replaced.

If a cartridge has a device to warn the user of the approaching expiration of the service life (end-of-service-life indicator, ESLI), the indication can be used for timely replacement of cartridges. ESLI can be active[46] or passive.[47] A passive indicator often uses a sensor that changes color. This element is installed in the cartridge at some distance from the filtered air outlet so that the color change occurs before harmful gases begin to pass through the cartridge. An active indicator may use a light or an audible alarm to signal that a cartridge needs to be replaced.

Passive end-of-service-life indicators[47]

  • Yablick 1925[48]

  • ChemMotif 2000

  • THO 1998 & Linders[49]

  • ТНО 2004[50]

  • Dragerwerk 1986[51]

  • Wallace 1975

  • Wallace 1975[52]

  • Roberts 1976[53]

  • China 2001

  • Dragerwerk 1957[54]

Active indicators use light or an audible alarm for user notification that is triggered by a sensor that is usually installed in the cartridge. Such indicators allow one to replace the cartridges on time in any light and do not require the worker to pay attention to the color of the indicator. They can also be used by workers who badly distinguish different colors.

A NIOSH respirator with an active ESLI[55]

Despite the presence of solutions for technical problems, and the availability of established certification requirements to the ESLI,[56] during the period from 1984 (first certification standard with requirements for active ESLI) until 2013 not one cartridge with active ESLI was approved in the US. It turned out that the requirements for the cartridges are not quite exact, and employers are under no requirement to use these indicators specifically. Therefore, respirator manufacturers fear commercial failure when selling new unusual products, although they continue to carry out research and development work in this area.

Active end-of-service-life indicators:

  • American Optical[57]

  • Auergesellschaft 1989[58]

  • Auergesellschaft 1989

  • Bernard 1998[59]

  • Dragerwerk 1994

  • FOGS 1998

  • Geraetebau 1991

  • Shigematsu 2002[60]

  • Stetter 1991[61]

Cartridge for protection against organic vapors. A gradual change in the appearance of the ESLI is shown.[62]

Examination of respirator use in the US showed that over 200,000 workers may be exposed to excessive harmful gases due to late replacement of cartridges.[33] So, the Laboratory of PPE (NPPTL) at the NIOSH began to develop an active ESLI. After the completion of the work, its results will help establish clear legal requirements for employers to follow and resulting technology will be transferred to industry to use in new improved RPD.[47]

Legal requirements

Promising full facepiece respirator equipped with (ESLI)[55]
Sensor for an end-of-service-life indicator (ESLI)[55]

Since it is not always possible to replace cartridges in a timely manner through the use of their odor ets,[clarification needed] OSHA has banned the use of this method. The employer is obliged to use only two ways to replace cartridges:[63] on schedule, and by using ESLI (because only these methods provide reliable preservation of workers’ health). OSHA instructions to inspectors provides specific guidance on inspection of implementation of such requirements.[64] On the other hand, the state requires manufacturers to provide the consumer with all necessary information about cartridges to allow one to make a schedule for their timely replacement. Similar requirements exist in the standard on occupational safety, governing selection and application of RPD in EU.[65] In England a tutorial on the selection and use of respirators recommends obtaining information from the manufacturer, and replacing the cartridges on a schedule or use ESLI, and prohibits reusing cartridges after exposure of volatile substances that can migrate.[66]

  • The US law required the employer to use exceptionally supplied air RPD (SAR) for protection against harmful gases that have no warning properties.[63][67] The use of supplied air respirators may be the only way to reliably protect workers in circumstances when there is no ESLI, and it is impossible to calculate their service life.
  • Legislation in the EU[68][69] allows an employer to use only supplied air respirators when employees work in conditions where air pollution is IDLH, because of the risk of untimely cartridge replacement.
Combined gas and particulate respirator filter for protection against acid gases, the type of BKF (БКФ). It has a transparent body and special sorbent that changes color upon saturation. This color change may be used for timely replacement of respirator filters, like an end-of-service-life indicator, ESLI.

Reuse

If the cartridge contains a lot of the sorbent and if the concentration of contaminants is low; or if the cartridge was used for a short duration of time, after completion of its use, it still has a lot of unsaturated sorbent (which can capture gases). This may allow using such cartridges again.

The molecules of an entrapped gases may de-absorb during storage of the cartridge. Due to the difference of concentrations inside the body of the cartridge (at the inlet concentration is greater; at the outlet for purified air concentration is lesser), these de-absorbed molecules migrate inside the cartridge to the outlet. The study of cartridges exposed to methyl bromide showed that this migration can impede the re-use of storage.[70] Concentration of harmful substances in the purified air may exceed the PEL (even if clean air is pumped through the cartridge). To protect worker health, US law prohibits cartridge reuse when exposed to harmful substances that can migrate, even if the cartridge has much non-saturated sorbent after the first use. According to the standards, "volatile" substances (those able to migrate) are considered substances with a boiling point below 65 °C. But studies have shown that at the boiling point above 65 °C reuse of the cartridge may be unsafe. Therefore, the manufacturer must provide the buyer with all information required for safe cartridge use. So, if the period of continuous service life of the cartridge (calculated by the program - see above) exceeds eight hours (see tables 4 and 5), the legislation may limit their use to one shift.

The paper [71] provides a procedure for calculating the concentration of harmful substances in purified air at the start of cartridge reuse which allows one to determine exactly where they may be safely reused. But these scientific results are not yet reflected in any standards or guidelines on respirator use. The author of the article, working in the US, did not even try to consider the use of gas cartridges more than twice. On the author's website one can download a free computer program that allows one to calculate concentration of harmful substances immediately after the start of re-use of the cartridge (which allows one to determine if it is safe).[44]

Regenerating gas cartridges

Activated carbon does not bond with harmful gases strongly, so they can be released later. Other sorbents undergo chemical reactions with the hazard and form strong bonds. Special technologies have been developed for recovery of used cartridges. They created conditions that have stimulated desorption caught earlier harmful substances. This used steam or heated air in the 1930s [72][73] or other methods.[74] Processing of the sorbent was carried out after its removal from the body of the cartridge, or without removing.

Specialists tried to use ion-exchange resin as the absorber in 1967. The authors proposed to regenerate the sorbent by washing it in a solution of alkali or soda.[75]

The study[70] also showed that cartridges can be effectively regenerated after exposure to methyl bromide (when they are blown with hot air 100 to 110 °C, flow rate 20 L/min, duration about 60 minutes).

Regeneration of sorbents is used consistently and systematically in the chemical industry, as it allows cost savings on the replacement of sorbent and regeneration of industrial gas cleaning devices to be carried out thoroughly and in an organized manner. However, in the mass use of gas masks under different conditions it is impossible to control the accuracy and correctness such regeneration of respirators’ cartridges. Therefore, despite the technical feasibility and commercial benefits, regeneration of respirator cartridges in such cases is not carried out.

References

  1. ↑ Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2019). "Respirator Change Schedules (Respiratory Protection eTool)" (in en). 200 Constitution Ave NW Washington, DC 20210. https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/respiratory/change_schedule.html. 
  2. ↑ David S. DeCamp, Joseph Costantino, Jon E. Black (November 2004) (in en). Estimating Organic Vapor Cartridge Service Life. Kennedy Circle Brooks City-Base: Air Force Institute for Operational Health Risk Analysis Directorate. pp. 53. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a439710.pdf. Retrieved 9 November 2019. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Дубинин, Михаил; Чмутов К. (1939) (in ru). Физико-химические основы противогазного дела // Physico-chemical bases of development and application of gas masks. Moscow: Военная академия химической защиты имени К.Е. Ворошилова. 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Karwacki, Christopher J.; Peterson, Gregory; Maxwell, Amy (9 March 2006). "Filtration Technology". Chemical Biological Individual Protection Conference 2006 (Charleston, South Carolina). https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2006/cbip/karwacki.pdf.  Conference listing
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Morrison, Robert W. (30 November 2002). "Overview of Current Collective Protection Filtration Technology" (in en). U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command. https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=453463. 
  6. ↑ Clayton G.D.; Clayton E.F (1985). Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 1 (3 ed.). New York: Willey-Interscience. p. 1008. ISBN 978-0-471-01280-1. 
  7. ↑ Michael E. Barsan, ed (2007). NIOSH Pocket guide to chemical hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-149 (3 ed.). Cincinnati, Ohio: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. pp. xiv–xvi; xx–xxiii; 2–340. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-149/. 
  8. ↑ "42 CFR Part 84 - Approval of Respiratory Protective Devices". United States Government Publishing Office. February 6, 2020. https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=c9c15fd462ffe5c4f4e85b73f161b2e0&r=PART&n=42y1.0.1.7.67#se42.1.84_11. 
  9. ↑ 42 Code of Federal Register 84 Approval of respiratory protective devices §84.113 — Canisters and cartridges; color and markings; requirements
  10. ↑ Rosenstock, Linda (1999). "Appendix A". TB Respiratory Protection Program In Health Care Facilities. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 99-143. Cincinnati, Ohio: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. pp. 42–44. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB99143. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/99-143/. 
  11. ↑ RF state standard ГОСТ Р 12.4.193-99 Occupational safety standards system. Respiratory protective devices. Gas filters and combined filters. General specifications (on Russian)
  12. ↑ RF state standard ГОСТ Р 12.4.231-2007 Occupational safety standards system. Respiratory protective devices. АX gas filters and combined filters for protection against low-boiling organic compounds. General specifications (on Russian)
  13. ↑ RF state standard ГОСТ Р 12.4.232-2007 Occupational safety standards system. Respiratory protective devices. SX gas filters and combined filters for protection against specific named compounds. General specifications (on Russian)
  14. ↑ RF state standard ГОСТ 12.4.235-2012 (EN 14387:2008) Occupational safety standards system. Respiratory protective devices. Gas filters and combined filters. General technical requirements. Test methods. Marking (on Russian)
  15. ↑ RF state standard ГОСТ 12.4.245-2013 Occupational safety standards system. Respiratory protective devices. Gas filters and combined filters. General specifications (on Russian)
  16. ↑ "Guide for selection and use of filtering devices". draeger.com. http://www.draeger.com/media/10/01/09/10010967/guide_for_selection_and_use_of_filtering_devices_9045782_en.pdf. 
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 Bollinger, Nancy (October 2004). NIOSH Respirator Selection Logic. NIOSH-Issued Publications. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB2005100. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-100/. 
  18. ↑ 2008 Respirator Selection Guide. St. Paul, MN: 3M. 2008. pp. 15–96. 
  19. ↑ "§ II. Hazardous chemical and biological occupational factors (II. Химические и биологические факторы производственной среды)" (in ru). State hygienic requirements 1.2.3685-21 "Hygienic requirements for the safety of environmental factors for humans" [СанПиН 1.2.3685-21 "Гигиенические нормативы и требования к обеспечению безопасности и (или) безвредности для человека факторов среды обитания"]. Moscow: Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing. 2021. p. 204. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202102030022. Retrieved 14 July 2023. 
  20. ↑ No information about the author (2018) (in ru). Guide to Gas Filter Selection (Occupational safety materials) Руководство по выбору фильтров - Материалы и средства для обеспечения безопасности труда. Moscow: 3М Russia. pp. 66. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1725386O/filter-selection-guide.pdf. Retrieved 27 October 2023. 
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 Kaptsov, Valery; Pankova, Vera (2023). "Режимы замены фильтров у респираторов, защищающих работников от воздействия промышленных газов (обзор)" (in ru). Chemical Engineering (Moscow: Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences) 24 (6): 230–240. doi:10.31044/1684-5811-2023-24-6-230-240. ISSN 1684-5811. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54029286. 
  22. ↑ Murnane, Sharon S.; Lehocky, Alex H.; Owens, Patrick (2013). Odor Thresholds for Chemicals with Established Health Standards (2nd ed.). Falls Church: American Industrial Hygiene Association. pp. 192. ISBN 978-1-935082-38-5. https://www.aiha.org/education/marketplace/odor-thresholds-3rd-ed. 
  23. ↑ Myers, Warren (1987). "Appendice C. Odor warning: Background information.". in Donald Miller. NIOSH Respirator Decision Logic. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 87-108. Cincinnati, Ohio: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. pp. 48–50. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB87108. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/87-108/. 
  24. ↑ Amoore, John; Hautala Earl (1983). "Odor as an aid to chemical safety: odor thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for 214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution". Journal of Applied Toxicology 3 (6): 272–290. doi:10.1002/jat.2550030603. ISSN 1099-1263. PMID 6376602. 
  25. ↑ Dalton, Pamela; Lees, Peter S.J.; Gould, Michele; Dilks, Daniel; Stefaniak, Aleksandr; Bader, Michael; Ihrig, Andreas; Triebig, Gerhard (2007). "Evaluation of Long-Term Occupational Exposure to Styrene Vapor on Olfactory Function". Chemical Sences (Oxford University Press) 32 (8): 739–747. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm041. ISSN 0379-864X. PMID 17602142. https://academic.oup.com/chemse/issue/32/8. 
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 Трумпайц Я.И.; Афанасьева Е.Н. (1962) (in ru). Индивидуальные средства защиты органов дыхания (альбом) // Respiratory Protective Devices (album-catalogue). Leningrad: Профиздат. 
  27. ↑ Шкрабо М.Л. (1982) (in ru). Промышленные противогазы и респираторы. Каталог. // Industrial Respiratory Protective Devices. Catalogue.. Cherkassy: Отделение НИИТЭХИМа. 
  28. ↑ Maggs F.A.P (1972). "A Non-destructive Test of Vapour Filters" (in en). The Annual of Occupational Hygiene 15 (2–4): 351–359. doi:10.1093/annhyg/15.2-4.351. ISSN 1475-3162. PMID 4648247. 
  29. ↑ Ballantyne, Bryan et al. (1981) (in en). Respiratory Protection. Principles and Applications. London, New York: Chapman & Hall. ISBN 978-0412227509. 
  30. ↑ British Patent No 60224/69
  31. ↑ Тихова Т.С.. Капцов В.А.. ed (in ru). Средства индивидуальной защиты работающих на железнодорожном транспорте. Каталог-справочник // Personal protective equipment for railway workers. Сatalogue-guidebook. Moscow: ВНИИЖГ, Транспорт. p. 245. 
  32. ↑ US OSHA occupational health and safety standard 29 Code of Federal Register 1910.1051 1,3-Butadiene 1910.1051(h)(3) Respirator selection
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (2003). Respirator Usage in Private Sector Firms. Morgantown, WV: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. pp. 214 (table 91). https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/respsurv/pdfs/respsurv2001.pdf. 
  34. ↑ ZieglerG., Martin; Hauthal W.; Koser H. (2003) (in de). Entwicklung von Indikatoren zur Anzeige des Gebrauchsdauer-Endes von Gasfiltern (Machbarkeitsstudie). Forschung Fb 997 (1 ed.). Bremerhaven: Wirtschaftsverl. ISBN 978-3-86509-041-6. 
  35. ↑ Cothran T. (2000). "Features - Service Life Software for Organic Vapour Cartridges". Occupational Health and Safety 69 (5): 84–93. ISSN 0362-4064. 
  36. ↑ The link to the document describing the program MerlinTM . Unfortunately, the product could not be found.
  37. ↑ 37.0 37.1 3M Service Life Software Version: 3.3 until January 1, 2016.
  38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 MSA program Cartridge Life Calculator link 1 link 2 (for US)
  39. ↑ Old link: Program for Cartridge Service Life calculation ezGuide
  40. ↑ Link to the manufacturer's website where You can download a program to calculate the life of the cartridges: S-Series - Software Downloads and T-Series - Software Downloads.
  41. ↑ The program for calculation of service life of respirator cartridges, developed by Scott: SureLife™ Cartridge Calculator
  42. ↑ Link to a database VOICE developed by Drager (version for US) with the program for calculation cartridge service life End-of-ServiceLife Calculator
  43. ↑ Wood, Gerry; Jay Snyder (2007). "Estimating Service Lives of Organic Vapor Cartridges III: Multiple Vapors at All Humidities". Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 4 (5): 363–374. doi:10.1080/15459620701277468. ISSN 1545-9632. PMID 17454504. https://zenodo.org/record/1234513. 
  44. ↑ 44.0 44.1 Computer program "MultiVapor with IBUR" - Immediate Breakthrough Upon Reuse
  45. ↑ The program for calculation of service life of respirator cartridges that use a mathematical model of Jerry Wood: Advisor Genius
  46. ↑ Rose-Pehrsson, Susan L.; Williams, Monica L. (2005). Integration of Sensor Technologies into Respirator Vapor Cartridges as End-of-Service-Life Indicators: Literature and Manufacturer's Review and Research Roadmap. Washington, DC: US Naval Research Laboratory. p. 37. http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA434905. Retrieved 2015-06-27. 
  47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 47.2 Favas, George (July 2005). End of Service Life Indicator (ESLI) for Respirator Cartridges. Part I: Literature Review. Victoria 3207 Australia: Human Protection & Performance Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation. p. 49. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA446250. 
  48. ↑ Yablick M. (1925) Indicating gas-mask canister, Patent No. US1537519
  49. ↑ Linders M.J.G., Bal E.A., Baak P.J., Hoefs J.H.M. and van Bokhoven J.J.G.M. (2001) Further development of an end of service life indicator for activated carbon filters, Carbon '01, University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
  50. ↑ Jager H. and Van de Voorde M.J. (1999) Device for removing one or more undesirable or dangerous substances from a gas or vapor mixture and a gas mask comprising such a device, Nederlandse Organisatie Voor Toegepastnatuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO, Patent No. US5944873[yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  51. ↑ Leichnitz K. (1987) Colorimetric indicator for the indication of the exhaustion of gas filters, Dragerwerk AG, Germany, Patent No. US4684380.[yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  52. ↑ Wallace R.A. (1975) Chemically activated warning system, Wallace, R. A., Patent No. US3902485.[yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}] Wallace R.A. (1975) Thermally activated warning system, Patent No. US3911413[yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  53. ↑ Roberts C.C. (1976) Colorimetric vinyl chloride indicator, Catalyst Research Corporation, Patent No. US3966440[yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}].
  54. ↑ Dragerwerk H. and Bernh, D. L. (1957), Patent No. GE962313
  55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 55.2 NPPTL presentation (2007) Sensor Development for ESLI & Application to Chemical Detection
  56. ↑ US NIOSH occupational safety and health standard 42 Code of Federal Register 84 Approval of Respiratory Protective Devices ‘’84.255 Requirements for end-of-service-life indicator.‘’
  57. ↑ Magnante P.C. (1979) Respirator cartridge end-of-service life indicator, American Optical Corporation, Patent No. US4146887.[yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  58. ↑ Freidank M., Coym J. and Schubert A. (1989) Warning device to indicate the state of gases exhaustion of a gas filter retaining dangerous gases, Auergesellschaft GMBH, Patent No. US4873970[yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  59. ↑ Bernard P., Caron S., St. Pierre M. and Lara, J. (2002) End-of-service indicator including porous waveguide for respirator cartridge, Institut National D’Optique, Quebec, Patent No. US6375725
  60. ↑ Shigematsu Y., Kurano R. and Shimada S. (2002) Gas mask having detector for detecting timing to exchange absorption can, Shigematsu Works Co Ltd and New Cosmos Electric Corp., Patent No. JP2002102367.
  61. ↑ Maclay G.J., Yue C., Findlay M.W. and Stetter J.R (2001). "A prototype active end-of-service-life indicator for respirator cartridges" (in en). Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene (Taylor and Francis) 6 (8): 677–682. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1991.10387960. ISSN 1047-322X.  Stetter J.R. and Maclay G.J. (1996) Chemical sensing apparatus and methods, Transducer Research Inc., Patent No. US5512882 [yes|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  62. ↑ Melissa Checky, Kevin Frankel, Denise Goddard, Erik Johnson, J. Christopher Thomas, Maria Zelinsky & Cassidy Javner (2016). "Evaluation of a passive optical based end of service life indicator (ESLI) for organic vapor respirator cartridges" (in en). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 13 (2): 112–120. doi:10.1080/15459624.2015.1091956. ISSN 1545-9624. PMID 26418577.  (Open access)
  63. ↑ 63.0 63.1 US OSHA occupational safety and health standard 29 Code of Federal Register 1910.134 Respiratory Protection
  64. ↑ Charles Jeffress (OSHA) Instruction CPL 2-0.120 (1998)
  65. ↑ EN 529-2005 Respiratory protective devices - Recommendations for selection, use, care and maintenance - Guidance document
  66. ↑ HSE (2013). Respiratory protective equipment at work. A practical guide (4 ed.). Health and Safety Executive. ISBN 978-0-7176-6454-2. http://www.hse.gov.uk/Pubns/priced/hsg53.pdf. 
  67. ↑ Bollinger, Nancy et al. (1987). A Guide to Industrial Respiratory Protection. NIOSH-Issued Publications. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB87116. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/87-116/. 
  68. ↑ BS 4275:1997 Guide to implementing an effective respiratory protective device programme
  69. ↑ DIN EN 529:2006. Atemschutzgerate - Empfehlungen fur Auswahl, Einsatz, Pflege und Instandhaltung.
  70. ↑ 70.0 70.1 Maggs, F. A. P.; Smith, M. E. (1975). "The Use and Regeneration of Type-O Canisters for Protection Against Methyl Bromide". Annals of Occupational Hygiene 18 (2): 111–119. doi:10.1093/annhyg/18.2.111. ISSN 0003-4878. PMID 1059379. 
  71. ↑ Wood, Gerry O.; Snyder, Jay L. (2011). "Estimating Reusability of Organic Air-Purifying Respirator Cartridges". Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 8 (10): 609–617. doi:10.1080/15459624.2011.606536. ISSN 1545-9624. PMID 21936700. 
  72. ↑ Торопов, Сергей (1938) (in ru). Испытания промышленных фильтрующих противогазов // The testing of industrial air purifying respirators. Moscow: Государственное научно-техническое издательство технической литературы НКТП. Редакция химической литературы. 
  73. ↑ Торопов, Сергей (1940) (in ru). Промышленные противогазы и респираторы // Industrial gas masks and respirators. Moscow Leningrad: Государственное научно-техническое издательство технической литературы. 
  74. ↑ Руфф ВТ (1936). "Регенерация промышленных фильтрующих противогазов // Regeneration of cartridges from industrial RPD" (in ru). Гигиена труда и техника безопасности // Occupational Health and Safety (1): 56–60. 
  75. ↑ Вулих А.И.; Богатырёв В.Л.; Загорская М.К.; Шивандронов Ю.А. (1967). "Иониты в качестве поглотителей для противогазов // The ion exchangers as a sorbent for respirator cartridges" (in ru). Безопасность труда в промышленности // Occupational Safety in Industry (1): 46–48. ISSN 0409-2961. 



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Engineering:Chemical_cartridge&oldid=3413446"