Join (topology)

From HandWiki
Geometric join of two line segments. The original spaces are shown in green and blue. The join is a three-dimensional solid, a disphenoid, in gray.

In topology, a field of mathematics, the join of two topological spaces A and B, often denoted by A∗B or A⋆B, is a topological space formed by taking the disjoint union of the two spaces, and attaching line segments joining every point in A to every point in B. The join of a space A with itself is denoted by A⋆2:=A⋆A. The join is defined in slightly different ways in different contexts

Geometric sets

If

A

and

B

are subsets of the Euclidean space

ℝn

, then:[1]: 1 

A⋆B := {t⋅a+(1−t)⋅b|a∈A,b∈B,t∈[0,1]}

,

that is, the set of all line-segments between a point in

A

and a point in

B

.

Some authors[2]: 5  restrict the definition to subsets that are joinable: any two different line-segments, connecting a point of A to a point of B, meet in at most a common endpoint (that is, they do not intersect in their interior). Every two subsets can be made "joinable". For example, if A is in ℝn and B is in ℝm, then A×{0m}×{0} and {0n}×B×{1} are joinable in ℝn+m+1. The figure above shows an example for m=n=1, where A and B are line-segments.

Examples

  • The join of two simplices is a simplex: the join of an n-dimensional and an m-dimensional simplex is an (m+n+1)-dimensional simplex. Some special cases are:
    • The join of two disjoint points is an interval (m=n=0).
    • The join of a point and an interval is a triangle (m=0, n=1).
    • The join of two line segments is homeomorphic to a solid tetrahedron or disphenoid, illustrated in the figure above right (m=n=1).
    • The join of a point and an (n-1)-dimensional simplex is an n-dimensional simplex.
  • The join of a point and a polygon (or any polytope) is a pyramid, like the join of a point and square is a square pyramid. The join of a point and a cube is a cubic pyramid.
  • The join of a point and a circle is a cone, and the join of a point and a sphere is a hypercone.

Topological spaces

If A and B are any topological spaces, then:

A⋆B := A⊔p0(A×B×[0,1])⊔p1B,

where the cylinder A×B×[0,1] is attached to the original spaces A and B along the natural projections of the faces of the cylinder:

A×B×{0}→p0A,
A×B×{1}→p1B.

Usually it is implicitly assumed that A and B are non-empty, in which case the definition is often phrased a bit differently: instead of attaching the faces of the cylinder A×B×[0,1] to the spaces A and B, these faces are simply collapsed in a way suggested by the attachment projections p1,p2: we form the quotient space

A⋆B := (A×B×[0,1])/∼,

where the equivalence relation ∼ is generated by

(a,b1,0)∼(a,b2,0)for all a∈A and b1,b2∈B,
(a1,b,1)∼(a2,b,1)for all a1,a2∈A and b∈B.

At the endpoints, this collapses A×B×{0} to A and A×B×{1} to B.

If

A

and

B

are bounded subsets of the Euclidean space

ℝn

, and

A⊆U

and

B⊆V

, where

U,V

are disjoint subspaces of

ℝn

such that the dimension of their affine hull is

dimU+dimV+1

(e.g. two non-intersecting non-parallel lines in

ℝ3

), then the topological definition reduces to the geometric definition, that is, the "geometric join" is homeomorphic to the "topological join":[3]: 75, Prop.4.2.4 

((A×B×[0,1])/∼)≃{t⋅a+(1−t)⋅b|a∈A,b∈B,t∈[0,1]}

Abstract simplicial complexes

If A and B are any abstract simplicial complexes, then their join is an abstract simplicial complex defined as follows:[3]: 74, Def.4.2.1 

  • The vertex set V(A⋆B) is a disjoint union of V(A) and V(B).
  • The simplices of A⋆B are all disjoint unions of a simplex of A with a simplex of B: A⋆B:={a⊔b:a∈A,b∈B} (in the special case in which V(A) and V(B) are disjoint, the join is simply {a∪b:a∈A,b∈B}).

Examples

  • Suppose A={∅,{a}} and B={∅,{b}}, that is, two sets with a single point. Then A⋆B={∅,{a},{b},{a,b}}, which represents a line-segment. Note that the vertex sets of A and B are disjoint; otherwise, we should have made them disjoint. For example, A⋆2=A⋆A={∅,{a1},{a2},{a1,a2}} where a1 and a2 are two copies of the single element in V(A). Topologically, the result is the same as A⋆B - a line-segment.
  • Suppose A={∅,{a}} and B={∅,{b},{c},{b,c}}. Then A⋆B=P({a,b,c}), which represents a triangle.
  • Suppose A={∅,{a},{b}} and B={∅,{c},{d}}, that is, two sets with two discrete points. then A⋆B is a complex with facets {a,c},{b,c},{a,d},{b,d}, which represents a "square".

The combinatorial definition is equivalent to the topological definition in the following sense:[3]: 77, Exercise.3  for every two abstract simplicial complexes A and B, ||A⋆B|| is homeomorphic to ||A||⋆||B||, where ||X|| denotes any geometric realization of the complex X.

Maps

Given two maps

f:A1→A2

and

g:B1→B2

, their join

f⋆g:A1⋆B1→A2⋆B2

is defined based on the representation of each point in the join

A1⋆B1

as

t⋅a+(1−t)⋅b

, for some

a∈A1,b∈B1

:[3]: 77 

f⋆g(t⋅a+(1−t)⋅b)=t⋅f(a)+(1−t)⋅f(b)

Special cases

The cone of a topological space X, denoted CX , is a join of X with a single point.

The suspension of a topological space X, denoted SX , is a join of X with S0 (the 0-dimensional sphere, or, the discrete space with two points).

Properties

Commutativity

The join of two spaces is commutative up to homeomorphism, i.e. A⋆B≅B⋆A.

Associativity

It is not true that the join operation defined above is associative up to homeomorphism for arbitrary topological spaces. However, for locally compact Hausdorff spaces A,B,C we have (A⋆B)⋆C≅A⋆(B⋆C). Therefore, one can define the k-times join of a space with itself, A*k:=A*⋯*A (k times).

It is possible to define a different join operation A⋆^B which uses the same underlying set as A⋆B but a different topology, and this operation is associative for all topological spaces. For locally compact Hausdorff spaces A and B, the joins A⋆B and A⋆^B coincide.[4]

Homotopy equivalence

If A and A′ are homotopy equivalent, then A⋆B and A′⋆B are homotopy equivalent too.[3]: 77, Exercise.2 

Reduced join

Given basepointed CW complexes (A,a0) and (B,b0), the "reduced join"

A⋆BA⋆{b0}∪{a0}⋆B

is homeomorphic to the reduced suspension

Σ(A∧B)

of the smash product. Consequently, since

A⋆{b0}∪{a0}⋆B

is contractible, there is a homotopy equivalence

A⋆B≃Σ(A∧B).

This equivalence establishes the isomorphism H~n(A⋆B)≅Hn−1(A∧B) (=Hn−1(A×B/A∨B)).

Homotopical connectivity

Given two triangulable spaces A,B, the homotopical connectivity (ηπ) of their join is at least the sum of connectivities of its parts:[3]: 81, Prop.4.4.3 

  • ηπ(A*B)≥ηπ(A)+ηπ(B).

As an example, let A=B=S0 be a set of two disconnected points. There is a 1-dimensional hole between the points, so ηπ(A)=ηπ(B)=1. The join A*B is a square, which is homeomorphic to a circle that has a 2-dimensional hole, so ηπ(A*B)=2. The join of this square with a third copy of S0 is a octahedron, which is homeomorphic to S2 , whose hole is 3-dimensional. In general, the join of n copies of S0 is homeomorphic to Sn−1 and ηπ(Sn−1)=n.

Deleted join

The deleted join of an abstract complex A is an abstract complex containing all disjoint unions of disjoint faces of A:[3]: 112 

AΔ*2:={a1⊔a2:a1,a2∈A,a1∩a2=∅}

Examples

  • Suppose A={∅,{a}} (a single point). Then AΔ*2:={∅,{a1},{a2}}, that is, a discrete space with two disjoint points (recall that A⋆2={∅,{a1},{a2},{a1,a2}} = an interval).
  • Suppose A={∅,{a},{b}} (two points). Then AΔ*2 is a complex with facets {a1,b2},{a2,b1} (two disjoint edges).
  • Suppose A={∅,{a},{b},{a,b}} (an edge). Then AΔ*2 is a complex with facets {a1,b1},{a1,b2},{a2,b1},{a2,b2} (a square). Recall that A⋆2 represents a solid tetrahedron.
  • Suppose A represents an (n-1)-dimensional simplex (with n vertices). Then the join A⋆2 is a (2n-1)-dimensional simplex (with 2n vertices): it is the set of all points (x1,...,x2n) with non-negative coordinates such that x1+...+x2n=1. The deleted join AΔ*2 can be regarded as a subset of this simplex: it is the set of all points (x1,...,x2n) in that simplex, such that the only nonzero coordinates are some k coordinates in x1,..,xn, and the complementary n-k coordinates in xn+1,...,x2n.

Properties

The deleted join operation commutes with the join. That is, for every two abstract complexes A and B:[3]: Lem.5.5.2 

(A*B)Δ*2=(AΔ*2)*(BΔ*2)

Proof. Each simplex in the left-hand-side complex is of the form

(a1⊔b1)⊔(a2⊔b2)

, where

a1,a2∈A,b1,b2∈B

, and

(a1⊔b1),(a2⊔b2)

are disjoint. Due to the properties of a disjoint union, the latter condition is equivalent to:

a1,a2

are disjoint and

b1,b2

are disjoint.

Each simplex in the right-hand-side complex is of the form (a1⊔a2)⊔(b1⊔b2), where a1,a2∈A,b1,b2∈B, and a1,a2 are disjoint and b1,b2 are disjoint. So the sets of simplices on both sides are exactly the same. □

In particular, the deleted join of the n-dimensional simplex Δn with itself is the n-dimensional crosspolytope, which is homeomorphic to the n-dimensional sphere Sn.[3]: Cor.5.5.3 

Generalization

The n-fold k-wise deleted join of a simplicial complex A is defined as:

AΔ(k)*n:={a1⊔a2⊔⋯⊔an:a1,⋯,an are k-wise disjoint faces of A}

, where "k-wise disjoint" means that every subset of k have an empty intersection.

In particular, the n-fold n-wise deleted join contains all disjoint unions of n faces whose intersection is empty, and the n-fold 2-wise deleted join is smaller: it contains only the disjoint unions of n faces that are pairwise-disjoint. The 2-fold 2-wise deleted join is just the simple deleted join defined above.

The n-fold 2-wise deleted join of a discrete space with m points is called the (m,n)-chessboard complex.

See also

References

  1. ↑ Colin P. Rourke and Brian J. Sanderson (1982) (in en). Introduction to Piecewise-Linear Topology. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-81735-9. ISBN 978-3-540-11102-3. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-81735-9. 
  2. ↑ Bryant, John L. (2001-01-01), Daverman, R. J.; Sher, R. B., eds., "Chapter 5 - Piecewise Linear Topology" (in en), Handbook of Geometric Topology (Amsterdam: North-Holland): pp. 219–259, ISBN 978-0-444-82432-5, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444824325500068, retrieved 2022-11-15 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 Template:Cite Matousek 2007, Section 4.3
  4. ↑ Fomenko, Anatoly; Fuchs, Dmitry (2016). Homotopical Topology (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 20. 
  • Hatcher, Allen, Algebraic topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. xii+544 pp. ISBN 0-521-79160-X and ISBN 0-521-79540-0
  • Brown, Ronald, Topology and Groupoids Section 5.7 Joins.