Model-free (reinforcement learning)
| Machine learning and data mining |
|---|
 |
In reinforcement learning (RL), a model-free algorithm (as opposed to a model-based one) is an algorithm which does not estimate the transition probability distribution (and the reward function) associated with the Markov decision process (MDP),[1] which, in RL, represents the problem to be solved. The transition probability distribution (or transition model) and the reward function are often collectively called the "model" of the environment (or MDP), hence the name "model-free". A model-free RL algorithm can be thought of as an "explicit" trial-and-error algorithm.[1] Typical examples of model-free algorithms include Monte Carlo RL, Sarsa, and Q-learning.
In model-free reinforcement learning, Monte Carlo (MC) estimation is a central component of a large class of model-free algorithms. The MC learning algorithm is essentially an important branch of generalized policy iteration, which has two periodically alternating steps, i.e., policy evaluation (PEV) and policy improvement (PIM). In this framework, each policy is first evaluated by its corresponding value function. Then, based on the evaluation result, greedy search is completed to output a better policy. The MC estimation is mainly applied to the first step, i.e., policy evaluation. The simplest idea, i.e., averaging the returns of all collected samples, is used to judge the effectiveness of the current policy. As more experience is accumulated, the estimate will converge to the true value by the law of large numbers. Hence, MC policy evaluation does not require any prior knowledge of the environment dynamics. Instead, all it needs is experience, i.e., samples of state, action, and reward, which are generated from interacting with a real environment.[2]
The estimation of value function is critical for model-free RL algorithms. Unlike Monte Carlo (MC) methods, temporal difference (TD) methods learn the value function by reusing existing value estimates. If one had to identify one idea as central and novel to reinforcement learning, it would undoubtedly be temporal difference. TD has the ability to learn from an incomplete sequence of events without waiting for the final outcome. TD has the ability to approximate the future return as a function of the current state. Similar to MC, TD only uses experience to estimate the value function without knowing any prior knowledge of the environment dynamics. The advantage of TD lies in the fact that it can update the value function based on its current estimate. Therefore, TD learning algorithms can learn from incomplete episodes or continuing tasks in a step-by-step manner, while MC must be implemented in an episode-by-episode fashion.[2]
Model-Free reinforcement learning algorithms
Model-free reinforcement learning algorithms can start from a blank policy candidate and achieve superhuman performance in many complex tasks, including Atari games, StarCraft and Chinese Go. Deep neural networks are responsible for recent artificial intelligence breakthroughs, and they can be combined with reinforcement learning to create something astounding, such as DeepMind’s AlphaGo. Mainstream model-free RL algorithms include Deep Q-Network (DQN), Dueling DQN, Double DQN (DDQN), Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO), Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic (A3C), Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), Twin Delayed DDPG (TD3), Soft Actor-Critic (SAC), Distributional Soft Actor-Critic (DSAC), etc.[2] Some model-free algorithms are listed as follows, especially those with deep learning.
| Algorithm | Description | Model | Policy | Action Space | State Space | Operator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DQN | Deep Q Network | Model-Free | Off-policy | Discrete | Typically Discrete or Continuous | Q-value |
| DDPG | Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient | Model-Free | Off-policy | Continuous | Discrete or Continuous | Q-value |
| A3C | Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic Algorithm | Model-Free | On-policy | Continuous | Discrete or Continuous | Advantage |
| TRPO | Trust Region Policy Optimization | Model-Free | On-policy | Continuous or Discrete | Discrete or Continuous | Advantage |
| PPO | Proximal Policy Optimization | Model-Free | On-policy | Continuous or Discrete | Discrete or Continuous | Advantage |
| TD3 | Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient | Model-Free | Off-policy | Continuous | Continuous | Q-value |
| SAC | Soft Actor-Critic | Model-Free | Off-policy | Continuous | Discrete or Continuous | Advantage |
| DSAC[3] | Distributional Soft Actor-Critic | Model-free | Off-policy | Continuous | Continuous | Value distribution |
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Sutton, Richard S.; Barto, Andrew G. (November 13, 2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (Second ed.). A Bradford Book. pp. 552. ISBN 0262039249. http://incompleteideas.net/book/bookdraft2018mar21.pdf. Retrieved 18 February 2019.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Li, Shengbo Eben (2023). Reinforcement Learning for Sequential Decision and Optimal Control (First ed.). Springer Verlag, Singapore. pp. 1–460. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-7784-8. ISBN 978-9-811-97783-1. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-19-7784-8.
- ↑ J Duan; Y Guan; S Li (2021). "Distributional Soft Actor-Critic: Off-policy reinforcement learning for addressing value estimation errors". IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 33 (11): 6584–6598. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3082568. PMID 34101599. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9448360.
 |  |
