Social:Oghur languages
| Oghuric | |
|---|---|
| Onogur Ogur | |
| Geographic distribution |
|
| Linguistic classification | Turkic
|
| Subdivisions | |
| Glottolog | bolg1249[4] |
The Oghur, Onogur or Ogur[5] languages (also known as Bulgar, Pre-Proto-Bulgar[6] or Lir-Turkic and r-Turkic) are a branch of the Turkic language family. The only extant member of the group is the Chuvash language. The first to branch off from the Turkic family, the Oghur languages show significant divergence from other Turkic languages, which all share a later common ancestor. Languages from this family were spoken in some nomadic tribal confederations, such as those of the Onogurs or Ogurs, Bulgars and Khazars.[7] Some scholars consider Hunnic a similar language[8] and refer to this extended grouping as Hunno-Proto-Bulgarian.[9]
History
The Oghur languages are a distinct group of the Turkic languages, standing in contrast to Common Turkic. Today they are represented only by Chuvash. Extinct Oghur languages include Bulgar and Khazar.[10]
There is no consensus among linguists on the relation between Oghur and Common Turkic and several questions remain unsolved:[5]
- Are they parallel branches of Proto-Turkic (3000–500 BC) and, if so, which branch is more archaic?
- Does Oghur represent Archaic Turkic before phonetic changes in 100-400 AD and was it a separate language?
The separation into Oghur r-dialects and Oghuz z-dialects is dated to the 2nd millennia BC.[11]
Features
The Oghur languages are also known as "-r Turkic" because the final consonant in certain words is r, not z as in Common Turkic.[10] Chuvash: вăкăр - Turkish: öküz - Tatar: үгез - English: ox. Hence the name Oghur corresponds to Oghuz "tribe" in Common Turkic.[5] Other correspondences are Com. š : Oghur l (tâš : tâl, 'stone'); s > š; *č > ś; k/q > ğ; y > j, ś; d, δ > δ > z (10th cent.) > r (13th cent.)"; ğd > z > r (14th cent.); a > ı (after 9th cent.).[12][13]
Distinguished specialist in the history of Central Asia the late Denis Sinor believed that the differences noted above suggest that the Oghur-speaking tribes could not have originated in territories inhabited by speakers of Mongolic languages, given that Mongolian dialects feature the -z suffix.[14] Equally eminent historian Professor Golden, however, has noted that there are many loanwords in Mongolic from Oghur, such as Mong. ikere, Oghur. *ikir, Hung. iker, Comm. ikiz (twins).[5] and holds the contradictory view that the Oghur inhabited the borderlands of Mongolia prior to the 5th century.[15]
The Oghur tribes are often connected with the Hungarians whose exoethnonym is usually derived from Onogurs (> (H)ungars).[16] The Hungarians are of mixed Ugrian / Turkic heritage, with strong Oghur-Bulgar and Khazar influences.[17][18] Hungarian has many borrowings from Turkic and Oghur languages:[19] Hung. tenger, Oghur. *tengir, Comm. tengiz (sea),[5] Hung. gyűrű, Oghur. jürük, Comm. yüzük (ring),[20] and terms of equestrian culture ló (horse), nyereg (saddle), fék (bridle), ostor (whip).[21] A number of Hungarian loanwords were borrowed before the 9th century, shown by sz- (< Oğ. ś-) rather than Comm. gy- (< Oğ. ǰ-): example Hung. szél, Oghur. *śäl, Chuv. śil, Comm. yel (wind), Hung. szűcs (tailor), Hung. szőlő (grapes).[20]
See also
- Oghur (tribe)
References
- ↑ Schultheis, Evan Michael (2019). The Battle of the Catalaunian Fields AD 451: Flavius Aetius, Attila the Hun and the Transformation of Gaul.. Havertown: Pen & Sword Books Limited. p. 205. ISBN 9781526745668.
- ↑ Juha Janhunen, (1996), Manchuria: An Ethnic History, p. 190
- ↑ Golden 1992, p. 110.
- ↑ Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds (2017). "Bolgar". Glottolog 3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. http://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/bolg1249.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Golden 2011, p. 30.
- ↑ Golden 2011, p. 39.
- ↑ Golden 2011, p. 239.
- ↑ Pritsak, Omeljan (1982). "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan". Harvard Ukrainian Studies (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute) IV (4): 470. ISSN 0363-5570. http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf.
- ↑ Pritsak (1981). "The Proto-Bulgarian Military Inventory Inscriptions". Turkic-Bulgarian-Hungarian relations. Budapest.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Golden 1992, p. 95–96.
- ↑ Karadeniz Araştırmaları, Sayı 3 (Güz 2004), s.71-77. Fuzuli Bayat: Oğuz kelimesinin etimolijisi, Page 74.
- ↑ Golden 1992, p. 20, 96.
- ↑ Golden 2011, p. 30, 236–239.
- ↑ Golden 2011, p. 29.
- ↑ Golden 2011, p. 31.
- ↑ Golden 1992, p. 102–103.
- ↑ Golden 1992, p. 262.
- ↑ Golden 2011, p. 333.
- ↑ Golden 1992, p. 259–260.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 Golden 2011, p. 164.
- ↑ Golden 1992, p. 259.
- Sources
- Pritsak, Omeljan (1982). "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan". Harvard Ukrainian Studies (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute) IV (4). ISSN 0363-5570. http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf.
- Golden, Peter Benjamin (1992). An introduction to the History of the Turkic peoples: ethnogenesis and state formation in medieval and early modern Eurasia and the Middle East. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. ISBN 9783447032742. https://www.academia.edu/12545004.
- Golden, Peter B. (2011). Studies on the Peoples and Cultures of the Eurasian Steppes. Editura Academiei Române; Editura Istros a Muzeului Brăilei. ISBN 9789732721520. https://www.academia.edu/9609971.
 |
