Biology:Cohesin

From HandWiki

Cohesin is a protein complex that mediates sister chromatid cohesion, homologous recombination, and DNA looping. Cohesin is formed of SMC3, SMC1, SCC1 and SCC3 (SA1 or SA2 in humans). Cohesin holds sister chromatids together after DNA replication until anaphase when removal of cohesin leads to separation of sister chromatids. The complex forms a ring-like structure and it is believed that sister chromatids are held together by entrapment inside the cohesin ring. Cohesin is a member of the SMC family of protein complexes which includes Condensin, MukBEF and SMC-ScpAB.

Cohesin was separately discovered in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) both by Douglas Koshland[1] and Kim Nasmyth in 1997.[2]

Structure and subunits

Models of SMC and cohesin structure
Main article: SMC_protein § Molecular_structure

Cohesin is a multi-subunit protein complex, made up of SMC1, SMC3, RAD21 and SCC3 (SA1 or SA2).[3] SMC1 and SMC3 are members of the Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) family. SMC proteins have two main structural characteristics: an ATP-binding cassette-like 'head' domain with ATPase activity (formed by the interaction of the N- and C- terminals) and a hinge domain that allows dimerization of SMCs. The head and the hinge domains are connected to each other via long anti-parallel coiled coils. The dimer is present in a V-shaped form, connected by the hinges.

The N-terminal domain of RAD21 contains two α-helices which forms a three helix bundle with the coiled coil of SMC3.[4] The central region of RAD21 is thought to be largely unstructured but contains several binding sites for regulators of cohesin. This includes a binding site for SA1 or SA2,[5] recognition motifs for separase cleavage[6] and a region that is competitively bound by PDS5A, PDS5B or NIPBL.[7][8][9] The C-terminal domain of RAD21 forms a winged helix that binds two β-sheets in the Smc1 head domain.[10]

Once RAD21 binds the SMC proteins, SCC3 can also associate with RAD21. When RAD21 binds on both SMC1 and SMC3, the cohesin complex forms a closed ring structure. The interfaces between the SMC subunits and RAD21 can open to allow DNA to pass in and out of the cohesin ring.[11]

A structure of the entire cohesin complex has been solved using cryo-electron microscopy.[12] Key findings from the structural studies include:

  1. Ring Architecture. Cohesin forms a tripartite ring where the SMC proteins (SMC1 and SMC3) dimerize via their hinge domains and are bridged by RAD21.
  2. ATPase Domain. The head domains of SMC proteins contain ATPase sites that drive cohesin's dynamic interactions with DNA, mostly loop extrusion.
  3. Conformational Flexibility. Cohesin is a highly dynamic protein, which exist in the open and closed conformations, interchanging by bending in the so-called elbows (see Loop extrusion for more).
  4. Regulatory Interactions. Accessory proteins like WAPL and PDS5 have been visualized interacting with the cohesin complex, elucidating their roles in unloading and stabilizing cohesin on chromatin.

Function

Cohesin functions can broadly separated into two categories: roles in trans (between different chromosomes due to cohesion between them) and in cis (within the same chromosome due to loop extrusion).[13] Although these two functions are tightly interlinked, it has been possible to separate them by creating a cohesin hinge mutant that can extrude loops but cannot maintain cohesion.[13]

Role in chromatin compaction and global organization

  1. DNA compaction. Cohesin helps to compact DNA by creating the loops of DNA in an ATP-dependent manner via the process called loop extrusion.
  2. Segregation of chromosomes. Cohesin's activity promotes segregation of chromosomes into chromosomal territories.[14]

Role in cell division

Cohesin plays an important role in cell division in both mitosis and meiosis.

  • During mitosis:
    1. Maintains sister chromatid cohesion. Cohesin keeps the sister chromatids connected during metaphase ensuring that each sister chromatid segregates to opposite poles during cell division. Without cohesin, the cell would be unable to control sister chromatid segregation since there would be no way of ensuring whether the spindle fiber—attached on each sister chromatid—is from a different pole.[15][16] Other proteins modulate cohesin function by regulating this process, such as PDS5A, PDS5B, NIPBL and ESCO1 in mammalian cells.[16]
    2. Helps to assemble bipolar spindle apparatus. Cohesin ensures the attachment of spindle microtubules and sister kinetochores onto the chromosomes. This is tightly related to the correct sister chromatid segregation towards the two spindle poles. Dysregulation of this process leads to premature chromosomes separation and multipolar spindle-formation.[17][18] The proteins Shugoshin 1 (or SGO1), Rae1 and NuMA are associated with cohesin in this assembly process.[19][20]
  • During meiosis, cohesin recruits additional meiotic-specific component Rec8, that is an essential player in these three processes:[21]
    1. Sister chromatids cohesion.
    2. Homologous chromosomes pairing.
    3. Recombination during meiosis.

Cohesin has also been found to be crucial for DNA damage checkpoint and repair. It participates in repairing double-strand breaks in DNA via homologous recombination, where the sister chromatid is used as a template for sequence reconstruction.[22]

Role in regulation of gene expression

Cohesin might play an important role in regulation of gene expression through the following mechanisms:

  1. Cohesin mediating enhancer-promoter interactions by bridging them in cis. [23]
  2. Cohesin connecting CTCF sites in cis by interacting with CTCFs in a highly specific and oriented manner.[24]
  3. Cohesin creating regulatory TADs[25] which are the environments for promoter-enhancer interactions.[26]

Other functions

  • Cohesin has been found to be essential for embryo development. Cohesin knockout is lethal for development of mouse and zebrafish.[27][28]
  • Cohesin deletion in mature macrophages leads to impairment of inflammatory response of the innate immune system and restricts transcriptional response of primary macrophages to microbial signals.[29]

Localization on DNA

Cohesin binding along the chromosomal DNA is considered to be dynamic and its location changes based on gene transcription, specific DNA sequence and presence of chromosome-associated proteins. There are several observations on cohesin patterns of localization on DNA.

  • Accumulation at CTCF sites: This happens due to direct interaction of cohesin subunits SA2 and SCC1 with CTCF.[30] Briefly, in the process of loop extrusion, cohesin moves actively along the two DNA double helices, translocating one of them with respect to the other. Thus, the loop can become smaller or larger. The loop extrusion process stops when cohesin encounters the architectural chromatin protein CTCF. The CTCF site needs to be in a proper orientation to stop cohesin.[31][32][33]
  • Accumulation at promoters: Two hypotheses were proposed to explain accumulation of cohesin at the gene promoters:[34][35]
  1. Cohesin location is influenced by the orientation of neighboring genes and it is most frequently located in areas of convergent transcription. Gene orientation depends on the direction of transcription and can be of three types: head-to-head, head-to-tail and tail-to-tail. The tail-to-tail configuration results in the convergence of transcription machinery. One hypothesis states that the RNA polymerase "pushes" cohesin along the DNA, causing them to move towards the direction of the RNA polymerases. Changing the transcription pattern of genes changes the location of cohesin indicating that localization of cohesin may depend on transcription.[36]
  2. In another model, chromatin loop extrusion is pushed by transcription generated supercoiling ensuring also that cohesin relocalizes quickly and loops grow with reasonable speed and in a good direction. In addition, the supercoiling-driven loop extrusion mechanism is consistent with earlier explanations proposing why topologically associating domains (TADs) flanked by convergent CTCF binding sites form more stable chromatin loops than TADs flanked by divergent CTCF binding sites. In this model, the supercoiling also stimulates enhancer promoter contacts and it is proposed that transcription of eRNA sends the first wave of supercoiling that can activate mRNA transcription in a given TAD.[37]
  • Accumulation at AT-rich sequences: Cohesins can be frequently found in chromosome arms that have AT-rich DNA sequences indicating that DNA sequence may be an independent factor of cohesin binding.[36]
  • Accumulation at centromeres: Cohesin rings, especially in budding yeast, are also located in the region surrounding the centromere.[36] Two hypotheses may explain this: the presence of repetitive heterochromatic DNA in centromeres and the presence of chromosome-associated proteins. For example, Schizosaccharomyces pombe have multiple copies of specific heterochromatic DNA whose involvement in cohesion binding has been proven. Budding yeast lacks repetitive sequences and, therefore, requires a different mechanism for cohesion binding. Evidence suggests that binding of cohesin to the budding yeast centromere region depends on chromosome-associated proteins of the kinetochore that mediate cohesion association to pericentric regions (the kinetochore is an enhancer of pericentric cohesin binding).[38]

Cohesin in sister chromatid cohesion

Main article: Biology:Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion

Mechanism of sister chromatid cohesion

It is not clear how the cohesin ring links sister chromatids together. There are two possible scenarios:

  1. Cohesin subunits bind to each sister chromatid and form a bridge between the two.
  2. Since cohesin has a ring structure, it is able to encircle both sister chromatids.

Current evidence suggests that the second scenario is the most likely. Proteins that are essential for sister chromatid cohesion, such as Smc3 and Scc1, do not regulate the formation of covalent bonds between cohesin and DNA, indicating that DNA interaction is not sufficient for cohesion.[11] In addition, disturbing the ring structure of cohesin through cleavage of Smc3 or Scc1 triggers premature sister chromatid segregation in vivo.[39] This shows that the ring structure is important for cohesin's function.

Early studies suggested various ways in which cohesin may entrap DNA,[40] including as a monomer that holds both homologues together, and a "hand-cuff" model where two intertwining cohesin complexes each hold one sister chromatid. While some studies support the idea of a hand-cuff model,[40] the model is inconsistent with a number of experimental observations,[41] and is generally considered to entrap chromatin as a monomer.

Even though the ring hypothesis appears to be valid, there are still questions about the number of rings required to hold sister chromatids together. One possibility is that one ring surrounds the two chromatids. Another possibility involves the creation of a dimer where each ring surrounds one sister chromatid. The two rings are connected to each other through formation of a bridge that holds the two sister chromatids together.

The topology and structure of these subunits has been best characterized in budding yeast,[42][43] but the sequence conservation of these proteins and biochemical and electron microscopic observations imply that cohesin complexes in other species are very similar in their structure [1].

The cohesin complex is established during the initial stages of S-phase. The complexes associate with chromosomes before DNA replication occurs. Once cells start replicating their DNA, cohesin rings close and link the sister chromatids together.[11] Cohesin complexes must be present during S-phase in order for cohesion to take place. It is unclear, however, how cohesin is loaded on the chromosomes during G1. There are two proposed hypotheses so far:

  1. The ATPase domain of the SMC proteins interacts with DNA and this interaction initially mediates the loading of cohesin complexes on chromosomes.
  2. Several proteins aid in the loading process. For example, Scc2 and Scc4 are both required for cohesin to load in budding yeast.

Dissociation of sister chromatid cohesion

The anaphase promoting complex associated to Cdc20 (APC/C-cdc20) marks Securin (anaphase inhibitor) for degradation by the proteasome. Securin is cleaved at anaphase, following APC/C-cdc20 mediated degradation, and it renders separase (a protease, inhibited by the association with securin) to cleave the kleisin subunit. An alpha-kleisin is associated with the cohesin complex, linking both SMC 3 and SMC 1 together, with the exact kleisin varying between mitosis and meiosis (Scc1 and Rec8 respectively), and its cleavage ultimately leads to the removal of cohesin from chromosomes.[44]

Dissociation of sister chromatids cohesion defines anaphase onset, which establishes two sets of identical chromosomes at each pole of the cell (telophase). Then the two daughter cells separate, and a new round of the cell cycle freshly starts in each one, at the stage of G0. When cells are ready to divide, because cell size is big enough or because they receive the appropriate stimulus,[45] they activate the mechanism to enter into the G1 stage of cell cycle, and they duplicate most organelles during S (synthesis) phase, including their centrosome. Therefore, when the cell division process will end, each daughter cell will receive a complete set of organelles. At the same time, during S phase all cells must duplicate their DNA very precisely, a process termed DNA replication. Once DNA replication has finished, in eukaryotes the DNA molecule is compacted and condensed, to form the mitotic chromosomes, each one constituted by two sister chromatids, which stay held together by the establishment of cohesion between them; each chromatid is a complete DNA molecule, attached via microtubules to one of the two centrosomes of the dividing cell, located at opposed poles of the cell. To avoid premature sister chromatid separation, the APC/C is maintained in an inactive state bound to different molecules, which are part of a complex mechanism termed the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Cohesin in meiosis

Cohesin proteins SMC1β, SMC3, REC8 and STAG3 appear to participate in cohesion of sister chromatids throughout the meiotic process in human oocytes.[46] SMC1β, REC8 and STAG3 proteins are meiosis specific cohesins.

The STAG3 protein appears to be essential for female meiosis. A homozygous frameshift mutation in the Stag3 gene was identified in a large consanguineous family with premature ovarian failure.[47] Also, female mice deficient in STAG3 are sterile, and their fetal oocytes arrest at early prophase 1.

During meiosis, establishment of cohesion of sister chromatids via cohesin rings is necessary for ensuring homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair and subsequent proper chromosome segregation.[48] The cohesin proteins are loaded on to chromatids during female fetal life and are not replenished over time, and thus with advancing maternal age aneuploidy in oocytes tends to increase resulting in decreased fecundity and increased infertility and miscarriage.[48] Also, variants of cohesin proteins are associated with primary ovarian insufficiency, trisomy in offspring and non-obstructive azoospermia.[48]

Oocyte loss is a natural process that accelerates as women enter their mid-thirties, and thus has a significant effect on female reproduction. Aged oocytes have a lower DNA repair capacity linked to cohesin deterioration.[49] Reduced cohesin levels make aged oocytes more vulnerable to persistent DNA damage leading to oocyte loss.[49]

Cohesin in loop extrusion

Main article: Biology:Loop extrusion

Loop extrusion, an ATP-dependent process driven by SMC-family proteins like cohesin and condensin, involves the translocation of DNA to form loops. This process continues until the extruding complex is released or encounters a barrier. In vertebrates, one well-studied factor that limits loop extrusion by cohesin is the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF). CTCF directly interacts with cohesin, stabilizing it on chromatin and anchoring loop boundaries.[50][51] The loop extrusion process leads to the formation of topologically associating domains (TADs) and loops in interphase.[24]

Evolution

The SMC proteins are found across the tree of life as early as in prokaryotes and have been conserved through evolution. In particular, the coils of SMC1 and SMC3 are conserved with an amino acid divergence of less than 0.5%.[52]

In bacteria, SMC-like protein MukBEF is involved in chromosome compaction [53] and segregation.[54] Most cohesin subunits are present in different eukaryotic taxa.[55] However, although uniformly present, cohesin might have different functions in different taxa. For example, in Drosophila melanogaster the extruding role of cohesin is debatable.[56]

Cohesin subunits in different eukaryotes may have different names:

Name Saccharomyces cerevisiae Schizosaccharomyces pombe Drosophila Vertebrates
Smc1 Smc1 Psm1 DmSmc1 Smc1
Smc3 Smc3 Psm3 Cap Smc3
α-Kleisin subunit Mcd1/Pds3/Scc1 Rad21 DmRad21 Rad21
Stromalin subunits Scc3 Psc3 DmSA SA1 and SA2/STAG1 and STAG2
Scc2 Scc2 Nipped-B NIPBL
Scc4 Scc4 Mau2 MAU2
PDS5 PDS5 Pds5 PDS5A
Wapl Rad61/Wpl1 Wapl WAPL
Cohesin acetyl transferase (CoAT) ECO1/CTF7 Deco/San ESCO1 and ESCO2
Cohesin deacetylase (CoDAC) Hos1 ? HDAC8

Research techniques to study cohesin

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP): Used to study cohesin-DNA interactions. Includes variations, such as ChIP-chip[57] or, more recent whole-genome ChIP-Seq.[58]
  • Chromosomes conformation capture: Used to analyze formation of loops and TADs that are frequently mediated by cohesin. This includes 3C,[59] and more recent whole-genome versions Hi-C [60] and Micro-C.[61][62] Notably, rapid degradation [63] of cohesin lead to drastic changes in Hi-C interaction patterns, such as change of chromatin scaling and disappearance of most TADs and dots.
  • CRISPR/Cas9: Enables the study of cohesin mutations and functional analysis.[64]
  • Live-cell imaging: Visualizes cohesin dynamic on chromatin.[65][66][67]

Clinical significance

Cohesinopathies

The term "cohesinopathy" has been used to describe conditions affecting the cohesin complex.[68][69][70]

These conditions include:

  • Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS)
    • Cause: Mutations in NIPBL, SMC1A, SMC3, HDAC8, and RAD21.[71]
    • Symptoms: Growth retardation, intellectual disability, and limb deformities among others.
  • Roberts syndrome (RBS)
    • Cause: Mutations in ESCO2, impairing cohesin acetylation.[72]
    • Symptoms: Prenatal growth failure, craniofacial abnormalities, and limb malformations.
  • Warsaw breakage syndrome (WABS)
    • Cause: Mutations in DDX11, a helicase interacting with cohesin.[73]
    • Symptoms: Chromosomal instability, intellectual disability, and growth defects.

Cohesin in cancer

Cohesin mutations are frequently observed in cancers such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), colorectal cancer, glioblastoma and bladder cancer.[74] Among the cohesin genes, STAG2 is the most commonly mutated, accounting for approximately half of all cohesin-related mutations observed in cancer.[75]

  • STAG2 mutations are linked to chromosomal instability and poor prognosis in AML and MDS.[76]
  • Disruption of DNA repair due to cohesin loss contributes to increased mutational burden in tumors.[76]

Other

The cohesin subunit STAG2 appears to play a significant role in hematopoietic function, as its loss enhances stem cell self-renewal while impairing differentiation.[77]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Guacci, V; Koshland, D; Strunnikov, A (3 October 1997). "A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae.". Cell 91 (1): 47–57. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)80008-8. PMID 9335334. 
  2. ↑ Michaelis, C; Ciosk, R; Nasmyth, K (3 October 1997). "Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids.". Cell 91 (1): 35–45. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)80007-6. PMID 9335333. Bibcode: 1997Cell...91...35M. 
  3. ↑ Losada A, Hirano M, Hirano T (1998). "Identification of Xenopus SMC protein complexes required for sister chromatid cohesion". Genes Dev. 12 (13): 1986–1997. doi:10.1101/gad.12.13.1986. PMID 9649503. 
  4. ↑ Gligoris, TG; Scheinost, JC; Bürmann, F; Petela, N; Chan, KL; Uluocak, P; Beckouët, F; Gruber, S et al. (21 November 2014). "Closing the cohesin ring: structure and function of its Smc3-kleisin interface.". Science 346 (6212): 963–7. doi:10.1126/science.1256917. PMID 25414305. Bibcode: 2014Sci...346..963G. 
  5. ↑ Hara, K; Zheng, G; Qu, Q; Liu, H; Ouyang, Z; Chen, Z; Tomchick, DR; Yu, H (October 2014). "Structure of cohesin subcomplex pinpoints direct shugoshin-Wapl antagonism in centromeric cohesion.". Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 21 (10): 864–70. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2880. PMID 25173175. 
  6. ↑ Uhlmann, F; Lottspeich, F; Nasmyth, K (1 July 1999). "Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1.". Nature 400 (6739): 37–42. doi:10.1038/21831. PMID 10403247. Bibcode: 1999Natur.400...37U. 
  7. ↑ Petela, NJ; Gligoris, TG; Metson, J; Lee, BG; Voulgaris, M; Hu, B; Kikuchi, S; Chapard, C et al. (21 June 2018). "Scc2 Is a Potent Activator of Cohesin's ATPase that Promotes Loading by Binding Scc1 without Pds5.". Molecular Cell 70 (6): 1134–1148.e7. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.022. PMID 29932904. 
  8. ↑ Kikuchi, S; Borek, DM; Otwinowski, Z; Tomchick, DR; Yu, H (1 November 2016). "Crystal structure of the cohesin loader Scc2 and insight into cohesinopathy.". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (44): 12444–12449. doi:10.1073/pnas.1611333113. PMID 27791135. Bibcode: 2016PNAS..11312444K. 
  9. ↑ Muir, KW; Kschonsak, M; Li, Y; Metz, J; Haering, CH; Panne, D (8 March 2016). "Structure of the Pds5-Scc1 Complex and Implications for Cohesin Function.". Cell Reports 14 (9): 2116–2126. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.078. PMID 26923589. 
  10. ↑ Haering, CH; Schoffnegger, D; Nishino, T; Helmhart, W; Nasmyth, K; Löwe, J (24 September 2004). "Structure and stability of cohesin's Smc1-kleisin interaction.". Molecular Cell 15 (6): 951–64. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.030. PMID 15383284. http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/groups/JYL/PDF/Haering%20Mol%20Cell%202004.pdf. 
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 "Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring". Cell 112 (6): 765–77. March 2003. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00162-4. PMID 12654244. 
  12. ↑ Shi, Zhubing; Gao, Haishan; Bai, Xiao-chen; Yu, Hongtao (2020-06-26). "Cryo-EM structure of the human cohesin-NIPBL-DNA complex" (in en). Science 368 (6498): 1454–1459. doi:10.1126/science.abb0981. PMID 32409525. Bibcode: 2020Sci...368.1454S. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abb0981. 
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Nagasaka, Kota; Davidson, Iain F.; Stocsits, Roman R.; Tang, Wen; Wutz, Gordana; Batty, Paul; Panarotto, Melanie; Litos, Gabriele et al. (2023). "Cohesin mediates DNA loop extrusion and sister chromatid cohesion by distinct mechanisms". Molecular Cell 83 (17): 3049–3063.e6. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.024. PMID 37591243. 
  14. ↑ Goloborodko, Anton; Imakaev, Maxim V.; Marko, John F.; Mirny, Leonid (18 May 2016). "Compaction and segregation of sister chromatids via active loop extrusion". eLife 5. doi:10.7554/eLife.14864. PMID 27192037. 
  15. ↑ Nasmyth, Kim; Haering, Christian H. (2009). "Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms". Annual Review of Genetics 43: 525–558. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233. PMID 19886810. 
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 Brooker, Amanda S.; Berkowitz, Karen M. (2014). "The roles of cohesins in mitosis, meiosis, and human health and disease". Cell Cycle Control. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.). 1170. pp. 229–266. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0888-2_11. ISBN 978-1-4939-0887-5. 
  17. ↑ Wong, Richard W.; Blobel, Günter (2008-10-07). "Cohesin subunit SMC1 associates with mitotic microtubules at the spindle pole". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (40): 15441–15445. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807660105. PMID 18832153. Bibcode: 2008PNAS..10515441W. 
  18. ↑ McNally, Karen P.; Beath, Elizabeth A.; Danlasky, Brennan M.; Barroso, Consuelo; Gong, Ting; Li, Wenzhe; Martinez-Perez, Enrique; McNally, Francis J. (October 2022). "Cohesin is required for meiotic spindle assembly independent of its role in cohesion in C. elegans". PLOS Genetics 18 (10). doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010136. PMID 36279281. 
  19. ↑ McGuinness, Barry E.; Hirota, Toru; Kudo, Nobuaki R.; Peters, Jan-Michael; Nasmyth, Kim (March 2005). "Shugoshin prevents dissociation of cohesin from centromeres during mitosis in vertebrate cells". PLOS Biology 3 (3). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030086. PMID 15737064. 
  20. ↑ Kong, Xiangduo; Ball, Alexander R.; Sonoda, Eiichiro; Feng, Jie; Takeda, Shunichi; Fukagawa, Tatsuo; Yen, Tim J.; Yokomori, Kyoko (March 2009). "Cohesin associates with spindle poles in a mitosis-specific manner and functions in spindle assembly in vertebrate cells". Molecular Biology of the Cell 20 (5): 1289–1301. doi:10.1091/mbc.e08-04-0419. PMID 19116315. 
  21. ↑ Sakuno, Takeshi; Hiraoka, Yasushi (22 January 2022). "Rec8 cohesin: A structural platform for shaping the meiotic chromosomes". Genes 13 (2): 200. doi:10.3390/genes13020200. PMID 35205245. 
  22. ↑ Litwin, Ireneusz; Pilarczyk, Ewa; Wysocki, Robert (2018-11-28). "The Emerging Role of Cohesin in the DNA Damage Response". Genes 9 (12): 581. doi:10.3390/genes9120581. PMID 30487431. 
  23. ↑ Kane, Lauren; Williamson, Iain; Flyamer, Ilya M.; Kumar, Yatendra; Hill, Robert E.; Lettice, Laura A.; Bickmore, Wendy A. (September 2022). "Cohesin is required for long-range enhancer action at the Shh locus". Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 29 (9): 891–897. doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00821-8. PMID 36097291. 
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Rao, Suhas S.P.; Huntley, Miriam H.; Durand, Neva C.; Stamenova, Elena K.; Bochkov, Ivan D.; Robinson, James T.; Sanborn, Adrian L.; Machol, Ido et al. (18 December 2014). "A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping". Cell 159 (7): 1665–1680. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021. PMID 25497547. 
  25. ↑ Rao, Suhas S.P.; Huang, Su-Chen; Glenn St Hilaire, Brian; Engreitz, Jesse M.; Perez, Elizabeth M.; Kieffer-Kwon, Kyong-Rim; Sanborn, Adrian L.; Johnstone, Sarah E. et al. (5 October 2017). "Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains". Cell 171 (2): 305–320.e24. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.026. PMID 28985562. Bibcode: 2017Cell..171..305R. 
  26. ↑ Lupiáñez, Darío G.; Kraft, Katerina; Heinrich, Verena; Krawitz, Peter; Brancati, Francesco; Klopocki, Eva; Horn, Denise; Kayserili, Hülya et al. (21 May 2015). "Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions". Cell 161 (5): 1012–1025. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004. PMID 25959774. Bibcode: 2015Cell..161.1012L. 
  27. ↑ Horsfield, Julia A.; Print, Cristin G.; Mönnich, Maren (2012). "Diverse Developmental Disorders from the One Ring: Distinct Molecular Pathways Underlie the Cohesinopathies". Frontiers in Genetics 3: 171. doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00171. PMID 22988450. 
  28. ↑ Chin, Chue Vin; Antony, Jisha; Ketharnathan, Sarada; Labudina, Anastasia; Gimenez, Gregory; Parsons, Kate M.; He, Jinshu; George, Amee J. et al. (7 December 2020). "Cohesin mutations are synthetic lethal with stimulation of WNT signaling". eLife 9. doi:10.7554/eLife.61405. PMID 33284104. 
  29. ↑ Cuartero, Sergi; Weiss, Felix D.; Dharmalingam, Gopuraja; Guo, Ya; Ing-Simmons, Elizabeth; Masella, Silvia; Robles-Rebollo, Irene; Xiao, Xiaolin et al. (September 2018). "Control of inducible gene expression links cohesin to hematopoietic progenitor self-renewal and differentiation". Nature Immunology 19 (9): 932–941. doi:10.1038/s41590-018-0184-1. PMID 30127433. 
  30. ↑ Li, Yan; Haarhuis, Judith H. I.; Sedeño Cacciatore, Ángela; Oldenkamp, Roel; van Ruiten, Marjon S.; Willems, Laureen; Teunissen, Hans; Muir, Kyle W. et al. (February 2020). "The structural basis for cohesin–CTCF-anchored loops" (in en). Nature 578 (7795): 472–476. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1910-z. PMID 31905366. Bibcode: 2020Natur.578..472L. 
  31. ↑ Fudenberg, Geoffrey; Imakaev, Maxim; Lu, Carolyn; Goloborodko, Anton; Abdennur, Nezar; Mirny, Leonid A. (May 2016). "Formation of Chromosomal Domains by Loop Extrusion". Cell Reports 15 (9): 2038–2049. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.085. PMID 27210764. Bibcode: 2016CellR..15.2038F. 
  32. ↑ Valton, Anne-Laure; Venev, Sergey V.; Mair, Barbara; Khokhar, Eraj Shafiq; Tong, Amy H. Y.; Usaj, Matej; Chan, Katherine; Pai, Athma A. et al. (December 2022). "A cohesin traffic pattern genetically linked to gene regulation" (in en). Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 29 (12): 1239–1251. doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00890-9. PMID 36482254. 
  33. ↑ Busslinger, Georg A.; Stocsits, Roman R.; van der Lelij, Petra; Axelsson, Elin; Tedeschi, Antonio; Galjart, Niels; Peters, Jan-Michael (April 2017). "Cohesin is positioned in mammalian genomes by transcription, CTCF and Wapl" (in en). Nature 544 (7651): 503–507. doi:10.1038/nature22063. PMID 28424523. Bibcode: 2017Natur.544..503B. 
  34. ↑ Banigan, Edward J.; Tang, Wen; van den Berg, Aafke A.; Stocsits, Roman R.; Wutz, Gordana; Brandão, Hugo B.; Busslinger, Georg A.; Peters, Jan-Michael et al. (2023-03-14). "Transcription shapes 3D chromatin organization by interacting with loop extrusion" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (11). doi:10.1073/pnas.2210480120. PMID 36897969. Bibcode: 2023PNAS..12010480B. 
  35. ↑ Fursova, Nadezda A.; Larson, Daniel R. (2024-12-01). "Transcriptional machinery as an architect of genome structure". Current Opinion in Structural Biology 89. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102920. PMID 39306948. 
  36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 36.2 "Molecular biology: cohesins slip sliding away". Nature 430 (6999): 520–1. July 2004. doi:10.1038/430520b. PMID 15282594. Bibcode: 2004Natur.430..520R. https://zenodo.org/record/1233231. 
  37. ↑ "Transcription-induced supercoiling as the driving force of chromatin loop extrusion during formation of TADs in interphase chromosomes". Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (4): 1648–1660. 13 November 2017. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1123. PMID 29140466. 
  38. ↑ "The kinetochore is an enhancer of pericentric cohesin binding". PLOS Biology 2 (9). September 2004. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020260. PMID 15309047. 
  39. ↑ "The cohesin complex and its roles in chromosome biology". Genes & Development 22 (22): 3089–114. November 2008. doi:10.1101/gad.1724308. PMID 19056890. 
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 "A handcuff model for the cohesin complex". The Journal of Cell Biology 183 (6): 1019–31. December 2008. doi:10.1083/jcb.200801157. PMID 19075111. 
  41. ↑ "Cohesin: a catenase with separate entry and exit gates?". Nature Cell Biology 13 (10): 1170–7. October 2011. doi:10.1038/ncb2349. PMID 21968990. 
  42. ↑ Haering, CH; Löwe, J; Hochwagen, A; Nasmyth, K (April 2002). "Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex.". Molecular Cell 9 (4): 773–88. doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00515-4. PMID 11983169. 
  43. ↑ Haering, CH; Farcas, AM; Arumugam, P; Metson, J; Nasmyth, K (17 July 2008). "The cohesin ring concatenates sister DNA molecules.". Nature 454 (7202): 297–301. doi:10.1038/nature07098. PMID 18596691. Bibcode: 2008Natur.454..297H. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/207/1/WRAP_Arumugam_resubmitted_cover_delete.pdf. 
  44. ↑ "Cohesin: a guardian of genome integrity". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1823 (8): 1324–42. August 2012. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.05.027. PMID 22677545. 
  45. ↑ "Size control in animal development". Cell 96 (2): 235–44. January 1999. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80563-2. PMID 9988218. Bibcode: 1999Cell...96..235C. 
  46. ↑ "Dynamics of cohesin proteins REC8, STAG3, SMC1 beta and SMC3 are consistent with a role in sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis in human oocytes". Human Reproduction 25 (9): 2316–27. September 2010. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq180. PMID 20634189. 
  47. ↑ "Mutant cohesin in premature ovarian failure". The New England Journal of Medicine 370 (10): 943–949. March 2014. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1309635. PMID 24597867. 
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 48.2 "Meiotic Cohesin and Variants Associated With Human Reproductive Aging and Disease". Front Cell Dev Biol 9. 2021. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.710033. PMID 34409039.  This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
  49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 "Changes in DNA repair compartments and cohesin loss promote DNA damage accumulation in aged oocytes". Curr Biol 34 (22): 5131–5148.e6. November 2024. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.09.040. PMID 39437784. Bibcode: 2024CBio...34.5131S. 
  50. ↑ Li, Yan; Haarhuis, Judith H. I.; Sedeño Cacciatore, Ángela; Oldenkamp, Roel; Van Ruiten, Marjon S.; Willems, Laureen; Teunissen, Hans; Muir, Kyle W. et al. (February 2020). "The structural basis for cohesin-CTCF-anchored loops". Nature 578 (7795): 472–476. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1910-z. PMID 31905366. Bibcode: 2020Natur.578..472L. 
  51. ↑ Hansen, Anders S. (December 2020). "CTCF as a boundary factor for cohesin-mediated loop extrusion: evidence for a multi-step mechanism". Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) 11 (1): 132–148. doi:10.1080/19491034.2020.1782024. PMID 32631111. 
  52. ↑ "The coiled coils of cohesin are conserved in animals, but not in yeast". PLOS ONE 4 (3). 2009. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004674. PMID 19262687. Bibcode: 2009PLoSO...4.4674W. 
  53. ↑ Bürmann, Frank; Funke, Louise F.H.; Chin, Jason W.; Löwe, Jan (December 2021). "Cryo-EM structure of MukBEF reveals DNA loop entrapment at chromosomal unloading sites" (in en). Molecular Cell 81 (23): 4891–4906.e8. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.011. PMID 34739874. 
  54. ↑ Niki, H.; Imamura, R.; Kitaoka, M.; Yamanaka, K.; Ogura, T.; Hiraga, S. (December 1992). "E.coli MukB protein involved in chromosome partition forms a homodimer with a rod-and-hinge structure having DNA binding and ATP/GTP binding activities." (in en). The EMBO Journal 11 (13): 5101–5109. doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05617.x. PMID 1464330. 
  55. ↑ Hoencamp, Claire; Dudchenko, Olga; Elbatsh, Ahmed M. O.; Brahmachari, Sumitabha; Raaijmakers, Jonne A.; van Schaik, Tom; Sedeño Cacciatore, Ángela; Contessoto, Vinícius G. et al. (2021-05-28). "3D genomics across the tree of life reveals condensin II as a determinant of architecture type" (in en). Science 372 (6545): 984–989. doi:10.1126/science.abe2218. PMID 34045355. 
  56. ↑ Matthews, Nicholas E.; White, Rob (September 2019). "Chromatin Architecture in the Fly: Living without CTCF/Cohesin Loop Extrusion?: Alternating Chromatin States Provide a Basis for Domain Architecture in Drosophila" (in en). BioEssays 41 (9). doi:10.1002/bies.201900048. PMID 31264253. 
  57. ↑ Wendt, Kerstin S.; Yoshida, Keisuke; Itoh, Takehiko; Bando, Masashige; Koch, Birgit; Schirghuber, Erika; Tsutsumi, Shuichi; Nagae, Genta et al. (February 2008). "Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor" (in en). Nature 451 (7180): 796–801. doi:10.1038/nature06634. PMID 18235444. Bibcode: 2008Natur.451..796W. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06634. 
  58. ↑ Tang, Zhonghui; Luo, Oscar Junhong; Li, Xingwang; Zheng, Meizhen; Zhu, Jacqueline Jufen; Szalaj, Przemyslaw; Trzaskoma, Pawel; Magalska, Adriana et al. (December 2015). "CTCF-Mediated Human 3D Genome Architecture Reveals Chromatin Topology for Transcription". Cell 163 (7): 1611–1627. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.024. PMID 26686651. 
  59. ↑ Dekker, Job; Rippe, Karsten; Dekker, Martijn; Kleckner, Nancy (2002-02-15). "Capturing Chromosome Conformation" (in en). Science 295 (5558): 1306–1311. doi:10.1126/science.1067799. PMID 11847345. Bibcode: 2002Sci...295.1306D. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1067799. 
  60. ↑ Lieberman-Aiden, Erez; van Berkum, Nynke L.; Williams, Louise; Imakaev, Maxim; Ragoczy, Tobias; Telling, Agnes; Amit, Ido; Lajoie, Bryan R. et al. (2009-10-09). "Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome" (in en). Science 326 (5950): 289–293. doi:10.1126/science.1181369. PMID 19815776. Bibcode: 2009Sci...326..289L. 
  61. ↑ Hsieh, Tsung-Han S.; Fudenberg, Geoffrey; Goloborodko, Anton; Rando, Oliver J. (December 2016). "Micro-C XL: assaying chromosome conformation from the nucleosome to the entire genome" (in en). Nature Methods 13 (12): 1009–1011. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4025. PMID 27723753. https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.4025. 
  62. ↑ Krietenstein, Nils; Abraham, Sameer; Venev, Sergey V.; Abdennur, Nezar; Gibcus, Johan; Hsieh, Tsung-Han S.; Parsi, Krishna Mohan; Yang, Liyan et al. (May 2020). "Ultrastructural Details of Mammalian Chromosome Architecture". Molecular Cell 78 (3): 554–565.e7. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.003. PMID 32213324. 
  63. ↑ Rao, Suhas S.P.; Huang, Su-Chen; Glenn St Hilaire, Brian; Engreitz, Jesse M.; Perez, Elizabeth M.; Kieffer-Kwon, Kyong-Rim; Sanborn, Adrian L.; Johnstone, Sarah E. et al. (October 2017). "Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains". Cell 171 (2): 305–320.e24. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.026. PMID 28985562. Bibcode: 2017Cell..171..305R. 
  64. ↑ Wendt, Kerstin S.; Peters, Jan-Michael (February 2009). "How cohesin and CTCF cooperate in regulating gene expression" (in en). Chromosome Research 17 (2): 201–214. doi:10.1007/s10577-008-9017-7. PMID 19308701. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10577-008-9017-7. 
  65. ↑ Mach, Pia; Kos, Pavel I.; Zhan, Yinxiu; Cramard, Julie; Gaudin, Simon; Tünnermann, Jana; Marchi, Edoardo; Eglinger, Jan et al. (December 2022). "Cohesin and CTCF control the dynamics of chromosome folding" (in en). Nature Genetics 54 (12): 1907–1918. doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01232-7. PMID 36471076. 
  66. ↑ Gabriele, Michele; Brandão, Hugo B.; Grosse-Holz, Simon; Jha, Asmita; Dailey, Gina M.; Cattoglio, Claudia; Hsieh, Tsung-Han S.; Mirny, Leonid et al. (2022-04-29). "Dynamics of CTCF- and cohesin-mediated chromatin looping revealed by live-cell imaging" (in en). Science 376 (6592): 496–501. doi:10.1126/science.abn6583. PMID 35420890. Bibcode: 2022Sci...376..496G. 
  67. ↑ van Staalduinen, Jente; van Staveren, Thomas; Grosveld, Frank; Wendt, Kerstin S. (2023-06-23). "Live-cell imaging of chromatin contacts opens a new window into chromatin dynamics". Epigenetics & Chromatin 16 (1): 27. doi:10.1186/s13072-023-00503-9. PMID 37349773. 
  68. ↑ "Cohesinopathy mutations disrupt the subnuclear organization of chromatin". The Journal of Cell Biology 187 (4): 455–62. November 2009. doi:10.1083/jcb.200906075. PMID 19948494. 
  69. ↑ "Warsaw breakage syndrome, a cohesinopathy associated with mutations in the XPD helicase family member DDX11/ChlR1". American Journal of Human Genetics 86 (2): 262–6. February 2010. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.008. PMID 20137776. 
  70. ↑ Warburton, Peter E., ed (September 2009). "The cellular phenotype of Roberts syndrome fibroblasts as revealed by ectopic expression of ESCO2". PLOS ONE 4 (9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006936. PMID 19738907. Bibcode: 2009PLoSO...4.6936V. 
  71. ↑ Kaur, Maninder; Blair, Justin; Devkota, Batsal; Fortunato, Sierra; Clark, Dinah; Lawrence, Audrey; Kim, Jiwoo; Do, Wonwook et al. (August 2023). "Genomic analyses in Cornelia de Lange Syndrome and related diagnoses: Novel candidate genes, genotype–phenotype correlations and common mechanisms" (in en). American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 191 (8): 2113–2131. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.63247. PMID 37377026. 
  72. ↑ Vega, Hugo; Waisfisz, Quinten; Gordillo, Miriam; Sakai, Norio; Yanagihara, Itaru; Yamada, Minoru; van Gosliga, Djoke; Kayserili, Hülya et al. (May 2005). "Roberts syndrome is caused by mutations in ESCO2, a human homolog of yeast ECO1 that is essential for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion" (in en). Nature Genetics 37 (5): 468–470. doi:10.1038/ng1548. PMID 15821733. https://www.nature.com/articles/ng1548. 
  73. ↑ van der Lelij, Petra; Chrzanowska, Krystyna H.; Godthelp, Barbara C.; Rooimans, Martin A.; Oostra, Anneke B.; Stumm, Markus; Zdzienicka, Małgorzata Z.; Joenje, Hans et al. (February 2010). "Warsaw Breakage Syndrome, a Cohesinopathy Associated with Mutations in the XPD Helicase Family Member DDX11/ChlR1" (in en). The American Journal of Human Genetics 86 (2): 262–266. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.008. PMID 20137776. 
  74. ↑ De Koninck, Magali; Losada, Ana (December 2016). "Cohesin Mutations in Cancer" (in en). Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 6 (12). doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a026476. PMID 27742736. 
  75. ↑ Waldman, Todd (September 2020). "Emerging themes in cohesin cancer biology" (in en). Nature Reviews Cancer 20 (9): 504–515. doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0270-1. PMID 32514055. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-020-0270-1. 
  76. ↑ 76.0 76.1 Tothova, Zuzana; Valton, Anne-Laure; Gorelov, Rebecca A.; Vallurupalli, Mounica; Krill-Burger, John M.; Holmes, Amie; Landers, Catherine C.; Haydu, J. Erika et al. (2021-02-08). "Cohesin mutations alter DNA damage repair and chromatin structure and create therapeutic vulnerabilities in MDS/AML" (in en). JCI Insight 6 (3). doi:10.1172/jci.insight.142149. PMID 33351783. 
  77. ↑ Viny, Aaron D.; Bowman, Robert L.; Liu, Yu; Lavallée, Vincent-Philippe; Eisman, Shira E.; Xiao, Wenbin; Durham, Benjamin H.; Navitski, Anastasia et al. (November 2019). "Cohesin Members Stag1 and Stag2 Display Distinct Roles in Chromatin Accessibility and Topological Control of HSC Self-Renewal and Differentiation" (in en). Cell Stem Cell 25 (5): 682–696.e8. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.08.003. PMID 31495782. 

Further reading



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Cohesin&oldid=4250191"