# Chemistry:Organic synthesis

Short description: Chemical construction of organic compounds

Organic synthesis is a special branch of chemical synthesis and is concerned with the intentional construction of organic compounds.[1] Organic molecules are often more complex than inorganic compounds, and their synthesis has developed into one of the most important branches of organic chemistry. There are several main areas of research within the general area of organic synthesis: total synthesis, semisynthesis, and methodology.

## Total synthesis

A total synthesis is the complete chemical synthesis of complex organic molecules from simple, commercially available petrochemical or natural precursors.[2] Total synthesis may be accomplished either via a linear or convergent approach. In a linear synthesis—often adequate for simple structures—several steps are performed one after another until the molecule is complete; the chemical compounds made in each step are called synthetic intermediates.[2] Most often, each step in a synthesis refers to a separate reaction taking place to modify the starting compound. For more complex molecules, a convergent synthetic approach may be preferable, one that involves individual preparation of several "pieces" (key intermediates), which are then combined to form the desired product. Convergent synthesis has the advantage of generating higher yield, compared to linear synthesis.

Robert Burns Woodward, who received the 1965 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for several total syntheses[3] (e.g., his 1954 synthesis of strychnine[4]), is regarded as the father of modern organic synthesis. Some latter-day examples include Wender's,[5] Holton's,[6] Nicolaou's,[7] and Danishefsky's[8] total syntheses of the anti-cancer therapeutic, paclitaxel (trade name, Taxol).[9]

## Methodology and applications

Each step of a synthesis involves a chemical reaction, and reagents and conditions for each of these reactions must be designed to give an adequate yield of pure product, with as few steps as possible.[10] A method may already exist in the literature for making one of the early synthetic intermediates, and this method will usually be used rather than an effort to "reinvent the wheel". However, most intermediates are compounds that have never been made before, and these will normally be made using general methods developed by methodology researchers. To be useful, these methods need to give high yields, and to be reliable for a broad range of substrates. For practical applications, additional hurdles include industrial standards of safety and purity.[11]

Methodology research usually involves three main stages: discovery, optimisation, and studies of scope and limitations. The discovery requires extensive knowledge of and experience with chemical reactivities of appropriate reagents. Optimisation is a process in which one or two starting compounds are tested in the reaction under a wide variety of conditions of temperature, solvent, reaction time, etc., until the optimal conditions for product yield and purity are found. Finally, the researcher tries to extend the method to a broad range of different starting materials, to find the scope and limitations. Total syntheses (see above) are sometimes used to showcase the new methodology and demonstrate its value in a real-world application.[12] Such applications involve major industries focused especially on polymers (and plastics) and pharmaceuticals. Some syntheses are feasible on a research or academic level, but not for industry level production. This may lead to further modification of the process. [13]

## Stereoselective synthesis

Most complex natural products are chiral,[14][15] and the bioactivity of chiral molecules varies with the enantiomer.[16] Historically, total syntheses targeted racemic mixtures, mixtures of both possible enantiomers, after which the racemic mixture might then be separated via chiral resolution.

In the later half of the twentieth century, chemists began to develop methods of stereoselective catalysis and kinetic resolution whereby reactions could be directed to produce only one enantiomer rather than a racemic mixture. Early examples include stereoselective hydrogenations (e.g., as reported by William Knowles[17] and Ryōji Noyori,[18] and functional group modifications such as the asymmetric epoxidation of Barry Sharpless;[19] for these specific achievements, these workers were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2001.[20] Such reactions gave chemists a much wider choice of enantiomerically pure molecules to start from, where previously only natural starting materials could be used. Using techniques pioneered by Robert B. Woodward and new developments in synthetic methodology, chemists became more able to take simple molecules through to more complex molecules without unwanted racemisation, by understanding stereocontrol, allowing final target molecules to be synthesised as pure enantiomers (i.e., without need for resolution). Such techniques are referred to as stereoselective synthesis.

## Synthesis design

Elias James Corey brought a more formal approach to synthesis design, based on retrosynthetic analysis, for which he won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1990. In this approach, the synthesis is planned backwards from the product, using standard rules.[21] The steps "breaking down" the parent structure into achievable component parts are shown in a graphical scheme that uses retrosynthetic arrows (drawn as ⇒, which in effect, mean "is made from").

More recently, and less widely accepted, computer programs have been written for designing a synthesis based on sequences of generic "half-reactions".[22]

## References

1. Cornforth, JW (1993-02-01). "The Trouble With Synthesis". Australian Journal of Chemistry 46 (2): 157–170. doi:10.1071/ch9930157.
2. Nicolaou, K. C.; Sorensen, E. J. (1996). Classics in Total Synthesis. New York: VCH.
3. Woodward, R. B.; Cava, M. P.; Ollis, W. D.; Hunger, A.; Daeniker, H. U.; Schenker, K. (1954). "The Total Synthesis of Strychnine". Journal of the American Chemical Society 76 (18): 4749–4751. doi:10.1021/ja01647a088.
4. Wender, Paul A.; Badham, Neil F.; Conway, Simon P.; Floreancig, Paul E.; Glass, Timothy E.; Gränicher, Christian; Houze, Jonathan B.; Jänichen, Jan et al. (1997-03-01). "The Pinene Path to Taxanes. 5. Stereocontrolled Synthesis of a Versatile Taxane Precursor". Journal of the American Chemical Society 119 (11): 2755–2756. doi:10.1021/ja9635387. ISSN 0002-7863.
5. Holton, Robert A.; Somoza, Carmen; Kim, Hyeong Baik; Liang, Feng; Biediger, Ronald J.; Boatman, P. Douglas; Shindo, Mitsuru; Smith, Chase C. et al. (1994-02-01). "First total synthesis of taxol. 1. Functionalization of the B ring". Journal of the American Chemical Society 116 (4): 1597–1598. doi:10.1021/ja00083a066. ISSN 0002-7863.
6. Nicolaou, K. C.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J. J.; Ueno, H.; Nantermet, P. G.; Guy, R. K.; Claiborne, C. F.; Renaud, J. et al. (1994-02-17). "Total synthesis of taxol" (in en). Nature 367 (6464): 630–634. doi:10.1038/367630a0. PMID 7906395. Bibcode1994Natur.367..630N.
7. Danishefsky, Samuel J.; Masters, John J.; Young, Wendy B.; Link, J. T.; Snyder, Lawrence B.; Magee, Thomas V.; Jung, David K.; Isaacs, Richard C. A. et al. (1996-01-01). "Total Synthesis of Baccatin III and Taxol". Journal of the American Chemical Society 118 (12): 2843–2859. doi:10.1021/ja952692a. ISSN 0002-7863.
8. March, J.; Smith, D. (2001). Advanced Organic Chemistry, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Carey, J.S.; Laffan, D.; Thomson, C. & Williams, M.T. (2006). "Analysis of the reactions used for the preparation of drug candidate molecules". Org. Biomol. Chem. 4 (12): 2337–2347. doi:10.1039/B602413K. PMID 16763676.
10. Nicolaou, K. C.; Hale, Christopher R. H.; Nilewski, Christian; Ioannidou, Heraklidia A. (2012-07-09). "Constructing molecular complexity and diversity: total synthesis of natural products of biological and medicinal importance" (in en). Chemical Society Reviews 41 (15): 5185–5238. doi:10.1039/C2CS35116A. ISSN 1460-4744. PMID 22743704.
11. Chen, Weiming; Suo, Jin; Liu, Yongjian; Xie, Yuanchao; Wu, Mingjun; Zhu, Fuqiang; Nian, Yifeng; Aisa, Haji A. et al. (2019-03-08). "Industry-Oriented Route Evaluation and Process Optimization for the Preparation of Brexpiprazole". Organic Process Research & Development 23 (5): 852–857. doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00438. ISSN 1083-6160.
12. Blackmond, Donna G. (2016-11-20). "The Origin of Biological Homochirality". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2 (5): a002147. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a002147. ISSN 1943-0264. PMID 20452962.
13. Welch, CJ (1995). Advances in Chromatography. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.. pp. 172.
14. Nguyen, Lien Ai; He, Hua; Pham-Huy, Chuong (2016-11-20). "Chiral Drugs: An Overview". International Journal of Biomedical Science 2 (2): 85–100. ISSN 1550-9702. PMID 23674971.
15. Knowles, William S. (2002-06-17). "Asymmetric Hydrogenations (Nobel Lecture)" (in en). Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41 (12): 1998–2007. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<1998::AID-ANIE1998>3.0.CO;2-8. ISSN 1521-3773.
16. Noyori, R.; Ikeda, T.; Ohkuma, T.; Widhalm, M.; Kitamura, M.; Takaya, H.; Akutagawa, S.; Sayo, N. et al. (1989). "Stereoselective hydrogenation via dynamic kinetic resolution". Journal of the American Chemical Society 111 (25): 9134–9135. doi:10.1021/ja00207a038.
17. Gao, Yun; Klunder, Janice M.; Hanson, Robert M.; Masamune, Hiroko; Ko, Soo Y.; Sharpless, K. Barry (1987-09-01). "Catalytic asymmetric epoxidation and kinetic resolution: modified procedures including in situ derivatization". Journal of the American Chemical Society 109 (19): 5765–5780. doi:10.1021/ja00253a032. ISSN 0002-7863.
18. Service. R.F. (2001). "Science Awards Pack a Full House of Winners". Science 294 (5542; October 19): 503–505. doi:10.1126/science.294.5542.503b. PMID 11641480.
19. Corey, E. J.; Cheng, X-M. (1995). The Logic of Chemical Synthesis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20. Todd, Matthew H. (2005). "Computer-aided Organic Synthesis". Chemical Society Reviews 34 (3): 247–266. doi:10.1039/b104620a. PMID 15726161.