Earth:Greenhouse gas emissions

From HandWiki
Short description: Sources and amounts of greenhouse gases emitted to the atmosphere from human activities
Annual greenhouse gas emissions per person (height of vertical bars) and per country (area of vertical bars) of the fifteen high-emitting countries.[1]

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human activities intensify the greenhouse effect. This contributes to climate change. Carbon dioxide (CO
2
), from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, is one of the most important factors in causing climate change. The largest emitters are China followed by the United States. The United States has higher emissions per capita. The main producers fueling the emissions globally are large oil and gas companies. Emissions from human activities have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide by about 50% over pre-industrial levels. The growing levels of emissions have varied, but have been consistent among all greenhouse gases. Emissions in the 2010s averaged 56 billion tons a year, higher than any decade before.[2] Total cumulative emissions from 1870 to 2017 were 425±20 GtC (1539 GtCO
2
) from fossil fuels and industry, and 180±60 GtC (660 GtCO
2
) from land use change. Land-use change, such as deforestation, caused about 31% of cumulative emissions over 1870–2017, coal 32%, oil 25%, and gas 10%.[3]

Carbon dioxide (CO
2
) is the main greenhouse gas resulting from human activities. It accounts for more than half of warming. Methane (CH4) emissions have almost the same short-term impact.[4] Nitrous oxide (N2O) and fluorinated gases (F-gases) play a lesser role in comparison.

Electricity generation, heat and transport are major emitters; overall energy is responsible for around 73% of emissions.[5] Deforestation and other changes in land use also emit carbon dioxide and methane. The largest source of anthropogenic methane emissions is agriculture, closely followed by gas venting and fugitive emissions from the fossil-fuel industry. The largest agricultural methane source is livestock. Agricultural soils emit nitrous oxide partly due to fertilizers. Similarly, fluorinated gases from refrigerants play an outsized role in total human emissions.

The current CO
2
-equivalent emission rates averaging 6.6 tonnes per person per year,[6] are well over twice the estimated rate 2.3 tons[7][8] required to stay within the 2030 Paris Agreement increase of 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) over pre-industrial levels.[9] Annual per capita emissions in the industrialized countries are typically as much as ten times the average in developing countries.[10]

The carbon footprint (or greenhouse gas footprint) serves as an indicator to compare the amount of greenhouse gases emitted over the entire life cycle from the production of a good or service along the supply chain to its final consumption.[11][12] Carbon accounting (or greenhouse gas accounting) is a framework of methods to measure and track how much greenhouse gas an organization emits.[13]

Relevance for greenhouse effect and global warming

Overview of main sources

Global greenhouse gas emissions by type of greenhouse gas.[14] The majority (74%) is CO
2
, followed by methane (17%), in 2016.

Relevant greenhouse gases

The major anthropogenic (human origin) sources of greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide (CO
2
), nitrous oxide (N2O), methane, three groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs, sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)).[15] Though the greenhouse effect is heavily driven by water vapor,[16] human emissions of water vapor are not a significant contributor to warming.

Although CFCs are greenhouse gases, they are regulated by the Montreal Protocol which was motivated by CFCs' contribution to ozone depletion rather than by their contribution to global warming. Ozone depletion has only a minor role in greenhouse warming, though the two processes are sometimes confused in the media. In 2016, negotiators from over 170 nations meeting at the summit of the United Nations Environment Programme reached a legally binding accord to phase out hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol.[17][18][19] The use of CFC-12 (except some essential uses) has been phased out due to its ozone depleting properties.[20] The phasing-out of less active HCFC-compounds will be completed in 2030.[21]

Human activities

The industrial era growth in atmospheric CO
2
-equivalent gas concentrations since 1750.[22]

Starting about 1750, industrial activity powered by fossil fuels began to significantly increase the concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Emissions have grown rapidly since about 1950 with ongoing expansions in global population and economic activity following World War II. As of 2021, measured atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide were almost 50% higher than pre-industrial levels.[22][23]

The main sources of greenhouse gases due to human activity (also called carbon sources) are:

  • Burning of fossil fuels and deforestation: Burning fossil fuels is estimated to have emitted 62% of the human-caused greenhouse gases in 2015.[24] The largest single source is coal-fired power stations, with 20% of greenhouse gases (GHG) as of 2021.[25]
  • Land use change (mainly deforestation in the tropics) accounts for about a quarter of total anthropogenic GHG emissions.[26]
  • Livestock enteric fermentation and manure management,[27] paddy rice farming, land use and wetland changes, man-made lakes,[28] pipeline losses, and covered vented landfill emissions leading to higher methane atmospheric concentrations. Many of the newer style fully vented septic systems that enhance and target the fermentation process also are sources of atmospheric methane.
  • Use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in refrigeration systems, and use of CFCs and halons in fire suppression systems and manufacturing processes.
  • Agricultural soils emit nitrous oxide (N2O) partly due to application of fertilizers.[29]
  • The largest source of anthropogenic methane emissions is agriculture, closely followed by gas venting and fugitive emissions from the fossil-fuel industry.[30][31] The largest agricultural methane source is livestock. Cattle (raised for both beef and milk, as well as for inedible outputs like manure and draft power) are the animal species responsible for the most emissions, representing about 65% of the livestock sector's emissions.[32]

Global estimates

Global greenhouse gas emissions are about 50 Gt per year[14] and for 2019 have been estimated at 57 Gt CO
2
eq including 5 Gt due to land use change.[33] In 2019, approximately 34% [20 GtCO
2
-eq] of total net anthropogenic GHG emissions came from the energy supply sector, 24% [14 GtCO
2
-eq] from industry, 22% [13 GtCO
2
-eq]from agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU), 15% [8.7 GtCO
2
-eq] from transport and 6% [3.3 GtCO
2
-eq] from buildings.[34]

The current CO
2
-equivalent emission rates averaging 6.6 tonnes per person per year,[6] are well over twice the estimated rate 2.3 tons[7][8] required to stay within the 2030 Paris Agreement increase of 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) over pre-industrial levels.[9]

While cities are sometimes considered to be disproportionate contributors to emissions, per-capita emissions tend to be lower for cities than the averages in their countries.[35]

A 2017 survey of corporations responsible for global emissions found that 100 companies were responsible for 71% of global direct and indirect emissions, and that state-owned companies were responsible for 59% of their emissions.[36][37]

China is, by a significant margin, Asia's and the world's largest emitter: it emits nearly 10 billion tonnes each year, more than one-quarter of global emissions.[38] Other countries with fast growing emissions are South Korea , Iran, and Australia (which apart from the oil rich Persian Gulf states, now has the highest per capita emission rate in the world). On the other hand, annual per capita emissions of the EU-15 and the US are gradually decreasing over time.[39] Emissions in Russia and Ukraine have decreased fastest since 1990 due to economic restructuring in these countries.[40]

2015 was the first year to see both total global economic growth and a reduction of carbon emissions.[41]

High income countries compared to low income countries

CO
2
emissions per capita versus GDP per capita (2018): In general, countries with a higher GDP per capita also have higher greenhouse gas emissions per capita.[42]

Annual per capita emissions in the industrialized countries are typically as much as ten times the average in developing countries.[10]:144 Due to China's fast economic development, its annual per capita emissions are quickly approaching the levels of those in the Annex I group of the Kyoto Protocol (i.e., the developed countries excluding the US).[39]

Africa and South America are both fairly small emitters: accounting for 3-4% of global emissions each. Both have emissions almost equal in size to international aviation and shipping.[38]

Calculations and reporting

Per capita CO
2
emissions surged after the mid-20th century, but then slowed their rate of growth.[43]

Variables

There are several ways of measuring greenhouse gas emissions. Some variables that have been reported include:[44]

  • Definition of measurement boundaries: Emissions can be attributed geographically, to the area where they were emitted (the territory principle) or by the activity principle to the territory that produced the emissions. These two principles result in different totals when measuring, for example, electricity importation from one country to another, or emissions at an international airport.
  • Time horizon of different gases: The contribution of given greenhouse gas is reported as a CO
    2
    equivalent. The calculation to determine this takes into account how long that gas remains in the atmosphere. This is not always known accurately[clarification needed] and calculations must be regularly updated to reflect new information.
  • The measurement protocol itself: This may be via direct measurement or estimation. The four main methods are the emission factor-based method, mass balance method, predictive emissions monitoring systems, and continuous emissions monitoring systems. These methods differ in accuracy, cost, and usability. Public information from space-based measurements of carbon dioxide by Climate Trace is expected to reveal individual large plants before the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference.[45]

These measures are sometimes used by countries to assert various policy/ethical positions on climate change.[46]:94The use of different measures leads to a lack of comparability, which is problematic when monitoring progress towards targets. There are arguments for the adoption of a common measurement tool, or at least the development of communication between different tools.[44]

Reporting

Emissions may be tracked over long time periods, known as historical or cumulative emissions measurements. Cumulative emissions provide some indicators of what is responsible for greenhouse gas atmospheric concentration build-up.[47]:199

National accounts balance

The national accounts balance tracks emissions based on the difference between a country's exports and imports. For many richer nations, the balance is negative because more goods are imported than they are exported. This result is mostly due to the fact that it is cheaper to produce goods outside of developed countries, leading developed countries to become increasingly dependent on services and not goods. A positive account balance would mean that more production was occurring within a country, so more operational factories would increase carbon emission levels.[48]

Emissions may also be measured across shorter time periods. Emissions changes may, for example, be measured against the base year of 1990. 1990 was used in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) as the base year for emissions, and is also used in the Kyoto Protocol (some gases are also measured from the year 1995).[10]:146, 149 A country's emissions may also be reported as a proportion of global emissions for a particular year.

Another measurement is of per capita emissions. This divides a country's total annual emissions by its mid-year population.[49]:370 Per capita emissions may be based on historical or annual emissions.[46]:106–107

Embedded emissions

One way of attributing greenhouse gas emissions is to measure the embedded emissions (also referred to as "embodied emissions") of goods that are being consumed. Emissions are usually measured according to production, rather than consumption.[50] For example, in the main international treaty on climate change (the UNFCCC), countries report on emissions produced within their borders, e.g., the emissions produced from burning fossil fuels.[51]:179[52]:1 Under a production-based accounting of emissions, embedded emissions on imported goods are attributed to the exporting, rather than the importing, country. Under a consumption-based accounting of emissions, embedded emissions on imported goods are attributed to the importing country, rather than the exporting, country.

A substantial proportion of CO
2
emissions is traded internationally. The net effect of trade was to export emissions from China and other emerging markets to consumers in the US, Japan, and Western Europe.[52]:4

Carbon footprint

Emission intensity

Emission intensity is a ratio between greenhouse gas emissions and another metric, e.g., gross domestic product (GDP) or energy use. The terms "carbon intensity" and "emissions intensity" are also sometimes used.[53] Emission intensities may be calculated using market exchange rates (MER) or purchasing power parity (PPP).[46]:96 Calculations based on MER show large differences in intensities between developed and developing countries, whereas calculations based on PPP show smaller differences.

Example tools and websites

Carbon accounting (or greenhouse gas accounting) is a framework of methods to measure and track how much greenhouse gas an organization emits.[13]

Climate TRACE

Historical trends

Cumulative and historical emissions

Cumulative and annual CO
2
emissions
Cumulatively, the U.S. has emitted the greatest amount of CO
2
, though China's emission trend is now steeper.[43]
Annually, the U.S. emitted the most CO
2
until early in the 21st century, when China's annual emissions began to dominate.[43]
Cumulative CO
2
emission by world region
Cumulative per person emissions by world region in 3 time periods
CO
2
emissions by source since 1880

Cumulative anthropogenic (i.e., human-emitted) emissions of CO
2
from fossil fuel use are a major cause of global warming,[54] and give some indication of which countries have contributed most to human-induced climate change. In particular, CO
2
stays in the atmosphere for at least 150 years and up to 1000 years,[55] whilst methane disappears within a decade or so,[56] and nitrous oxides last about 100 years.[57] The graph gives some indication of which regions have contributed most to human-induced climate change.[58][59]:15 When these numbers are calculated per capita cumulative emissions based on then-current population the situation is shown even more clearly. The ratio in per capita emissions between industrialized countries and developing countries was estimated at more than 10 to 1.

Non-OECD countries accounted for 42% of cumulative energy-related CO
2
emissions between 1890 and 2007.[51]:179–80 Over this time period, the US accounted for 28% of emissions; the EU, 23%; Japan, 4%; other OECD countries 5%; Russia, 11%; China, 9%; India, 3%; and the rest of the world, 18%.[51]:179–80

Overall, developed countries accounted for 83.8% of industrial CO
2
emissions over this time period, and 67.8% of total CO
2
emissions. Developing countries accounted for industrial CO
2
emissions of 16.2% over this time period, and 32.2% of total CO
2
emissions.

However, what becomes clear when we look at emissions across the world today is that the countries with the highest emissions over history are not always the biggest emitters today. For example, in 2017, the UK accounted for just 1% of global emissions.[38]

In comparison, humans have emitted more greenhouse gases than the Chicxulub meteorite impact event which caused the extinction of the dinosaurs.[60]

Transport, together with electricity generation, is the major source of greenhouse gas emissions in the EU. Greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector continue to rise, in contrast to power generation and nearly all other sectors. Since 1990, transportation emissions have increased by 30%. The transportation sector accounts for around 70% of these emissions. The majority of these emissions are caused by passenger vehicles and vans. Road travel is the first major source of greenhouse gas emissions from transportation, followed by aircraft and maritime.[61][62] Waterborne transportation is still the least carbon-intensive mode of transportation on average, and it is an essential link in sustainable multimodal freight supply chains.[63]

Buildings, like industry, are directly responsible for around one-fifth of greenhouse gas emissions, primarily from space heating and hot water consumption. When combined with power consumption within buildings, this figure climbs to more than one-third.[64][65][66]

Within the EU, the agricultural sector presently accounts for roughly 10% of total greenhouse gas emissions, with methane from livestock accounting for slightly more than half of 10%.[67]

Estimates of total CO
2
emissions do include biotic carbon emissions, mainly from deforestation.[46]:94 Including biotic emissions brings about the same controversy mentioned earlier regarding carbon sinks and land-use change.[46]:93–94 The actual calculation of net emissions is very complex, and is affected by how carbon sinks are allocated between regions and the dynamics of the climate system.

Fossil fuel CO
2
emissions on log (natural and base 10) scales

The graphic shows the logarithm of 1850–2019 fossil fuel CO
2
emissions;[68] natural log on left, actual value of Gigatons per year on right. Although emissions increased during the 170-year period by about 3% per year overall, intervals of distinctly different growth rates (broken at 1913, 1945, and 1973) can be detected. The regression lines suggest that emissions can rapidly shift from one growth regime to another and then persist for long periods of time. The most recent drop in emissions growth - by almost 3 percentage points - was at about the time of the 1970s energy crisis. Percent changes per year were estimated by piecewise linear regression on the log data and are shown on the plot; the data are from The Integrated Carbon Observation system.[69]

Changes since a particular base year

The sharp acceleration in CO
2
emissions since 2000 to more than a 3% increase per year (more than 2 ppm per year) from 1.1% per year during the 1990s is attributable to the lapse of formerly declining trends in carbon intensity of both developing and developed nations. China was responsible for most of global growth in emissions during this period. Localised plummeting emissions associated with the collapse of the Soviet Union have been followed by slow emissions growth in this region due to more efficient energy use, made necessary by the increasing proportion of it that is exported.[70] In comparison, methane has not increased appreciably, and N2O by 0.25% y−1.

Using different base years for measuring emissions has an effect on estimates of national contributions to global warming.[59]:17–18[71] This can be calculated by dividing a country's highest contribution to global warming starting from a particular base year, by that country's minimum contribution to global warming starting from a particular base year. Choosing between base years of 1750, 1900, 1950, and 1990 has a significant effect for most countries.[59]:17–18 Within the G8 group of countries, it is most significant for the UK, France and Germany. These countries have a long history of CO
2
emissions (see the section on Cumulative and historical emissions).

Data from Global Carbon Project

Map of key fossil fuel projects ("carbon bombs"): proposed or existing fossil fuel extraction projects (a coal mine, oil or gas project) that would result in more than 1 gigaton of CO
2
emissions if its reserves were completely extracted and burnt.[72]

The Global Carbon Project continuously releases data about CO
2
emissions, budget and concentration.

CO
2
emissions[73]
Year Fossil fuels

and industry (excluding cement carbonation) Gt C

Land use

change Gt C

Total

Gt C

Total

Gt CO
2

2010 9.106 1.32 10.43 38.0
2011 9.412 1.35 10.76 39.2
2012 9.554 1.32 10.87 39.6
2013 9.640 1.26 10.9 39.7
2014 9.710 1.34 11.05 40.2
2015 9.704 1.47 11.17 40.7
2016 9.695 1.24 10.93 39.8
2017 9.852 1.18 11.03 40.2
2018 10.051 1.14 11.19 40.7
2019 10.120 1.24 11.36 41.3
2020 9.624 1.11 10.73 39.1
2021 10.132 1.08 11.21 40.8
2022

(projection)

10.2 1.08 11.28 41.3

Emissions by type of greenhouse gas

GHG emissions 2020 by gas type
without land-use change
using 100 year GWP
Total: 49.8 GtCO
2
e[74]:5

  CO
2
mostly by fossil fuel (72%)
  CH4 methane (19%)
  N2O nitrous oxide (6%)
  Fluorinated gases (3%)

CO
2
emissions by fuel type[68]

  coal (39%)
  oil (34%)
  gas (21%)
  cement (4%)
  others (1.5%)

Carbon dioxide (CO
2
) is the dominant emitted greenhouse gas, while methane (CH
4
) emissions almost have the same short-term impact.[4] Nitrous oxide (N2O) and fluorinated gases (F-gases) play a lesser role in comparison.

Greenhouse gas emissions are measured in CO
2
equivalents
determined by their global warming potential (GWP), which depends on their lifetime in the atmosphere. Estimations largely depend on the ability of oceans and land sinks to absorb these gases. Short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) including methane, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), tropospheric ozone and black carbon persist in the atmosphere for a period ranging from days to 15 years; whereas carbon dioxide can remain in the atmosphere for millennia.[75] Reducing SLCP emissions can cut the ongoing rate of global warming by almost half and reduce the projected Arctic warming by two-thirds.[76]

Greenhouse gas emissions in 2019 were estimated at 57.4 GtCO
2
e, while CO
2
emissions alone made up 42.5 Gt including land-use change (LUC).[77]

While mitigation measures for decarbonization are essential on the longer term, they could result in weak near-term warming because sources of carbon emissions often also co-emit air pollution. Hence, pairing measures that target carbon dioxide with measures targeting non-CO
2
pollutants – short-lived climate pollutants, which have faster effects on the climate, is essential for climate goals.[78]

Carbon dioxide (CO
2
)

  • Fossil fuel: oil, gas and coal (89%) are the major driver of anthropogenic global warming with annual emissions of 35.6 GtCO
    2
    in 2019.[79]:20
  • Cement production (4%) is estimated at 1.42 GtCO
    2
  • Land-use change (LUC) is the imbalance of deforestation and reforestation. Estimations are very uncertain at 4.5 GtCO
    2
    . Wildfires alone cause annual emissions of about 7 GtCO
    2
    [80][81]
  • Non-energy use of fuels, carbon losses in coke ovens, and flaring in crude oil production.[79]

Methane (CH4)

Historical and future temperature projections showing importance of mitigating short-lived climate pollutants like methane

Methane has a high immediate impact with a 5-year global warming potential of up to 100.[4] Given this, the current 389 Mt of methane emissions[79]:6 has about the same short-term global warming effect as CO
2
emissions, with a risk to trigger irreversible changes in climate and ecosystems. For methane, a reduction of about 30% below current emission levels would lead to a stabilization in its atmospheric concentration.

  • Fossil fuels (32%), again, account for most of the methane emissions including coal mining (12% of methane total), gas distribution and leakages (11%) as well as gas venting in oil production (9%).[79]:6[79]:12
  • Livestock (28%) with cattle (21%) as the dominant source, followed by buffalo (3%), sheep (2%), and goats (1.5%).[79]:6, 23
  • Human waste and wastewater (21%): When biomass waste in landfills and organic substances in domestic and industrial wastewater is decomposed by bacteria in anaerobic conditions, substantial amounts of methane are generated.[79]:12
  • Rice cultivation (10%) on flooded rice fields is another agricultural source, where anaerobic decomposition of organic material produces methane.[79]:12

Nitrous oxide (N2O)

N2O has a high GWP and significant Ozone Depleting Potential. It is estimated that the global warming potential of N2O over 100 years is 265 times greater than CO
2
.[82] For N2O, a reduction of more than 50% would be required for a stabilization.

Most emissions (56%) of nitrous oxide comes from agriculture, especially meat production: cattle (droppings on pasture), fertilizers, animal manure.[79]:12Further contributions come from combustion of fossil fuels (18%) and biofuels[83] as well as industrial production of adipic acid and nitric acid.

F-gases

Fluorinated gases include hydrofluorocarbons (HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). They are used by switchgear in the power sector, semiconductor manufacture, aluminum production and a largely unknown source of SF6.[79]:38 Continued phase down of manufacture and use of HFCs under the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol will help reduce HFC emissions and concurrently improve the energy efficiency of appliances that use HFCs like air conditioners, freezers and other refrigeration devices.

Hydrogen

Hydrogen leakages contribute to indirect global warming.[84] When hydrogen is oxidized in the atmosphere, the result is an increase in concentrations of greenhouse gases in both the troposphere and the stratosphere.[85] Hydrogen can leak from hydrogen production facilities as well as any infrastructure in which hydrogen is transported, stored, or consumed.[86]

Black carbon

Black carbon is formed through the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, biofuel, and biomass. It is not a greenhouse gas but a climate forcing agent. Black carbon can absorb sunlight and reduce albedo when deposited on snow and ice. Indirect heating can be caused by the interaction with clouds.[87] Black carbon stays in the atmosphere for only several days to weeks.[88] Emissions may be mitigated by upgrading coke ovens, installing particulate filters on diesel-based engines, reducing routine flaring, and minimizing open burning of biomass.

Emissions by sector

Contributions to climate change broken down by economic sector as of 2019
2016 global greenhouse gas emissions by sector.[89] Percentages are calculated from estimated global emissions of all Kyoto Greenhouse Gases, converted to CO
2
equivalent quantities (GtCO
2
e).

Global greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed to different sectors of the economy. This provides a picture of the varying contributions of different types of economic activity to climate change, and helps in understanding the changes required to mitigate climate change.

Greenhouse gas emissions can be divided into those that arise from the combustion of fuels to produce energy, and those generated by other processes. Around two thirds of greenhouse gas emissions arise from the combustion of fuels.[90]

Energy may be produced at the point of consumption, or by a generator for consumption by others. Thus emissions arising from energy production may be categorized according to where they are emitted, or where the resulting energy is consumed. If emissions are attributed at the point of production, then electricity generators contribute about 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[91] If these emissions are attributed to the final consumer then 24% of total emissions arise from manufacturing and construction, 17% from transportation, 11% from domestic consumers, and 7% from commercial consumers.[92] Around 4% of emissions arise from the energy consumed by the energy and fuel industry itself.

The remaining third of emissions arise from processes other than energy production. 12% of total emissions arise from agriculture, 7% from land use change and forestry, 6% from industrial processes, and 3% from waste.[90]

Electricity generation

Global greenhouse gas emissions by gas

Coal-fired power stations are the single largest emitter, with over 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2018.[93] Although much less polluting than coal plants, natural gas-fired power plants are also major emitters,[94] taking electricity generation as a whole over 25% in 2018.[95] Notably, just 5% of the world's power plants account for almost three-quarters of carbon emissions from electricity generation, based on an inventory of more than 29,000 fossil-fuel power plants across 221 countries.[96] In the 2022 IPCC report, it is noted that providing modern energy services universally would only increase greenhouse gas emissions by a few percent at most. This slight increase means that the additional energy demand that comes from supporting decent living standards for all would be far lower than current average energy consumption.[97]

Agriculture, forestry and land use

Agriculture

Deforestation
Mean annual carbon loss from tropical deforestation.[98]

Deforestation is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. A study shows annual carbon emissions (or carbon loss) from tropical deforestation have doubled during the last two decades and continue to increase. (0.97 ±0.16 PgC per year in 2001–2005 to 1.99 ±0.13 PgC per year in 2015–2019)[99][98]

Land-use change
Substantial land-use change contributions to emissions have been made by Latin America, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Pacific Islands. Area of rectangles shows total emissions for that region.[100]

Land-use change, e.g., the clearing of forests for agricultural use, can affect the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by altering how much carbon flows out of the atmosphere into carbon sinks.[101] Accounting for land-use change can be understood as an attempt to measure "net" emissions, i.e., gross emissions from all sources minus the removal of emissions from the atmosphere by carbon sinks.[46]:92–93

There are substantial uncertainties in the measurement of net carbon emissions.[102] Additionally, there is controversy over how carbon sinks should be allocated between different regions and over time.[46]:93 For instance, concentrating on more recent changes in carbon sinks is likely to favour those regions that have deforested earlier, e.g., Europe.

In 1997, human-caused Indonesian peat fires were estimated to have released between 13% and 40% of the average annual global carbon emissions caused by the burning of fossil fuels.[103][104][105]

Transport of people and goods

Aviation and shipping (dashed line) produce a significant proportion of global carbon dioxide emissions

Transportation accounts for 15% of emissions worldwide.[106] Over a quarter of global transport CO
2
emissions are from road freight,[107] so many countries are further restricting truck CO
2
emissions to help limit climate change.[108]

Maritime transport accounts for 3.5% to 4% of all greenhouse gas emissions, primarily carbon dioxide.[109][110] In 2022, the shipping industry's 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions made it "the sixth largest greenhouse gas emitter worldwide, ranking between Japan and Germany."[111][112][113]

Aviation

Jet airliners contribute to climate change by emitting carbon dioxide (CO
2
), nitrogen oxides, contrails and particulates.In 2018, global commercial operations generated 2.4% of all CO
2
emissions.[114]

In 2020, approximately 3.5% of the overall human impacts on climate are from the aviation sector. The impact of the sector on climate in the late 20 years had doubled, but the part of the contribution of the sector in comparison to other sectors did not change because other sectors grew as well.[115]

Some representative figures for CO
2
average direct emissions (not accounting for high-altitude radiative effects) of airliners expressed as CO
2
and CO
2
equivalent per passenger kilometer:[116]

  • Domestic, short distance, less than 463 km (288 mi): 257 g/km CO
    2
    or 259 g/km (14.7 oz/mile) CO
    2
    e
  • Long-distance flights: 113 g/km CO
    2
    or 114 g/km (6.5 oz/mile) CO
    2
    e

Buildings and construction

In 2018, manufacturing construction materials and maintaining buildings accounted for 39% of carbon dioxide emissions from energy and process-related emissions. Manufacture of glass, cement, and steel accounted for 11% of energy and process-related emissions.[117] Because building construction is a significant investment, more than two-thirds of buildings in existence will still exist in 2050. Retrofitting existing buildings to become more efficient will be necessary to meet the targets of the Paris Agreement; it will be insufficient to only apply low-emission standards to new construction.[118] Buildings that produce as much energy as they consume are called zero-energy buildings, while buildings that produce more than they consume are energy-plus. Low-energy buildings are designed to be highly efficient with low total energy consumption and carbon emissions—a popular type is the passive house.[117]

The construction industry has seen marked advances in building performance and energy efficiency over recent decades.[119] Green building practices that avoid emissions or capture the carbon already present in the environment, allow for reduced footprint of the construction industry, for example, use of hempcrete, cellulose fiber insulation, and landscaping.[120]

In 2019, the building sector was responsible for 12 GtCO
2
-eq emissions. More than 95% of these emissions were carbon, and the remaining 5% were CH
4
, N
2
O
, and halocarbon.[121]

The largest contributor to building sector emissions (49% of total) is the production of electricity for use in buildings.[122]

Of global building sector GHG emissions, 28% are produced during the manufacturing process of building materials such as steel, cement (a key component of concrete),[123] and glass.[122] The conventional process inherently related to the production of steel and cement results in large amounts of CO2 emitted. For example, the production of steel in 2018 was responsible for 7 to 9% of the global CO2 emissions.[124]

The remaining 23% of global building sector GHG emissions are produced directly on site during building operations.[122]

Embodied carbon emissions in construction sector

Embodied carbon emissions, or upfront carbon emissions (UCE), are the result of creating and maintaining the materials that form a building.[125] As of 2018, "Embodied carbon is responsible 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions and 28% of global building sector emissions ... Embodied carbon will be responsible for almost half of total new construction emissions between now and 2050."[126]

GHG emissions which are produced during the mining, processing, manufacturing, transportation and installation of building materials are referred to as the embodied carbon of a material.[127] The embodied carbon of a construction project can be reduced by using low-carbon materials for building structures and finishes, reducing demolition, and reusing buildings and construction materials whenever possible.[122]

Industrial processes

(As of 2020) Secunda CTL is the world's largest single emitter, at 56.5 million tonnes CO
2
a year.[128]

Mining

Flaring and venting of natural gas in oil wells is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions. Its contribution to greenhouse gases has declined by three-quarters in absolute terms since a peak in the 1970s of approximately 110 million metric tons/year, and in 2004 accounted for about 1/2 of one percent of all anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions.[129]

The World Bank estimates that 134 billion cubic meters of natural gas are flared or vented annually (2010 datum), an amount equivalent to the combined annual gas consumption of Germany and France or enough to supply the entire world with gas for 16 days. This flaring is highly concentrated: 10 countries account for 70% of emissions, and twenty for 85%.[130]

Steel and aluminum

Steel and aluminum are key economic sectors for the carbon capture and storage. According to a 2013 study, "in 2004, the steel industry along emits about 590M tons of CO
2
, which accounts for 5.2% of the global anthropogenic GHG emissions. CO
2
emitted from steel production primarily comes from energy consumption of fossil fuel as well as the use of limestone to purify iron oxides."[131]

Plastics

Plastics are produced mainly from fossil fuels. It was estimated that between 3% and 4% of global GHG emissions are associated with plastics' life cycles.[132] The EPA estimates[133] as many as five mass units of carbon dioxide are emitted for each mass unit of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) produced—the type of plastic most commonly used for beverage bottles,[134] the transportation produce greenhouse gases also.[135] Plastic waste emits carbon dioxide when it degrades. In 2018 research claimed that some of the most common plastics in the environment release the greenhouse gases methane and ethylene when exposed to sunlight in an amount that can affect the earth climate.[136][137]

Due to the lightness of plastic versus glass or metal, plastic may reduce energy consumption. For example, packaging beverages in PET plastic rather than glass or metal is estimated to save 52% in transportation energy, if the glass or metal package is single-use, of course.

In 2019 a new report "Plastic and Climate" was published. According to the report, the production and incineration of plastics will contribute in the equivalent of 850 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO
2
) to the atmosphere in 2019. With the current trend, annual life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of plastics will grow to 1.34 billion tonnes by 2030. By 2050, the life cycle emissions of plastics could reach 56 billion tonnes, as much as 14 percent of the Earth's remaining carbon budget.[138] The report says that only solutions which involve a reduction in consumption can solve the problem, while others like biodegradable plastic, ocean cleanup, using renewable energy in plastic industry can do little, and in some cases may even worsen it.[139]

Pulp and paper

The global print and paper industry accounts for about 1% of global carbon dioxide emissions.[140] Greenhouse gas emissions from the pulp and paper industry are generated from the combustion of fossil fuels required for raw material production and transportation, wastewater treatment facilities, purchased power, paper transportation, printed product transportation, disposal and recycling.

Various services

Digital services

In 2020, data centers (excluding cryptocurrency mining) and data transmission each used about 1% of world electricity.[141] The digital sector produces between 2% and 4% of global GHG emissions,[142] a large part of which is from chipmaking.[143] However the sector reduces emissions from other sectors which have a larger global share, such as transport of people,[144] and possibly buildings and industry.[145]

Mining for proof-of-work cryptocurrencies requires enormous amounts of electricity and consequently comes with a large carbon footprint.[146] Proof-of-work blockchains such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Monero were estimated to have added between 3 million and 15 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO
2
) to the atmosphere in the period from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017.[147] By the end of 2021, Bitcoin was estimated to produce 65.4 million tonnes of CO
2
, as much as Greece,[148] and consume between 91 and 177 terawatt-hours annually. Bitcoin is the least energy-efficient cryptocurrency, using 707.6 kilowatt-hours of electricity per transaction.[149][150][151]

A study in 2015 investigated the global electricity usage that can be ascribed to Communication Technology (CT) between 2010 and 2030. Electricity usage from CT was divided into four principle categories: (i) consumer devices, including personal computers, mobile phones, TVs and home entertainment systems; (ii) network infrastructure; (iii) data center computation and storage; and lastly (iv) production of the above categories. The study estimated for the worst-case scenario, that CT electricity usage could contribute up to 23% of the globally released greenhouse gas emissions in 2030.[152]

Health care

The healthcare sector produces 4.4–4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[153]

Based on the 2013 life cycle emissions in the health care sector, it is estimated that the GHG emissions associated with US health care activities may cause an additional 123,000 to 381,000 DALYs annually.[154]

Water supply and sanitation

Tourism

According to UNEP, global tourism is a significant contributor to the increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.[155]

Emissions by other characteristics

The responsibility for anthropogenic climate change differs substantially among individuals, e.g. between groups or cohorts.

By type of energy source

Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electricity supply technologies, median values calculated by IPCC[156]
Lifecycle GHG emissions, in g CO
2
eq. per kWh, UNECE 2020[90]

By socio-economic class and age

This pie chart illustrates both total emissions for each income group, and emissions per person within each income group. For example, the 10% with the highest incomes are responsible for half of carbon emissions, and its members emit an average of more than five times as much per person as members of the lowest half of the income scale.[157]
Though total CO
2
emissions (size of pie charts) differ substantially among high-emitting regions, the pattern of higher income classes emitting more than lower income classes is consistent across regions.[158] The world's top 1% of emitters emit over 1000 times more than the bottom 1%.[158]
Scaling the effect of wealth to the national level: richer (developed) countries emit more CO
2
per person than poorer (developing) countries.[159] Emissions are roughly proportional to GDP per person, though the rate of increase diminishes with average GDP/pp of about $10,000.

Fueled by the consumptive lifestyle of wealthy people, the wealthiest 5% of the global population has been responsible for 37% of the absolute increase in greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. It can be seen that there is a strong relationship between income and per capita carbon dioxide emissions.[38] Almost half of the increase in absolute global emissions has been caused by the richest 10% of the population.[160] In the newest report from the IPCC 2022, it states that the lifestyle consumptions of the poor and middle class in emerging economies produce approximately 5–50 times less the amount that the high class in already developed high-income countries.[161][162] Variations in regional, and national per capita emissions partly reflect different development stages, but they also vary widely at similar income levels. The 10% of households with the highest per capita emissions contribute a disproportionately large share of global household greenhouse gas emissions.[162]

Studies find that the most affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most environmental impacts, and robust action by them is necessary for prospects of moving towards safer environmental conditions.[163][164]

According to a 2020 report by Oxfam and the Stockholm Environment Institute,[165][166] the richest 1% of the global population have caused twice as much carbon emissions as the poorest 50% over the 25 years from 1990 to 2015.[167][168][169] This was, respectively, during that period, 15% of cumulative emissions compared to 7%.[170] The bottom half of the population is directly responsible for less than 20% of energy footprints and consume less than the top 5% in terms of trade-corrected energy. The largest disproportionality was identified to be in the domain of transport, where e.g. the top 10% consume 56% of vehicle fuel and conduct 70% of vehicle purchases.[171] However, wealthy individuals are also often shareholders and typically have more influence[172] and, especially in the case of billionaires, may also direct lobbying efforts, direct financial decisions, and/or control companies.

Based on a study in 32 developed countries, researchers found that "seniors in the United States and Australia have the highest per capita footprint, twice the Western average. The trend is mainly due to changes in expenditure patterns of seniors".[173]

Methods for reducing greenhouse gas emissions

Governments have taken action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate climate change. Countries and regions listed in Annex I of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (i.e., the OECD and former planned economies of the Soviet Union) are required to submit periodic assessments to the UNFCCC of actions they are taking to address climate change.[174]:3 Policies implemented by governments include for example national and regional targets to reduce emissions, promoting energy efficiency, and support for an energy transition.

Projections for future emissions

Figure 3 from the International Energy Outlook 2023 (IEO2023) report.[175] Aggregate energy‑related carbon emissions remain constant to 2050 under the low GDP growth case, otherwise emissions rise significantly.

In October 2023, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) released a series of projections out to 2050 based on current ascertainable policy interventions.[175][176][177] Unlike many integrated systems models in this field, emissions are allowed to float rather than be pinned to net‑zero in 2050. A sensitivity analysis varied key parameters, primarily future GDP growth (2.6% pa as reference, variously 1.8% and 3.4%) and secondarily technological learning rates, future crude oil prices, and similar exogenous inputs. The model results are far from encouraging. In no case did aggregate energy-related carbon emissions ever dip below 2022 levels (see figure 3 plot). The IEO2023 exploration provides a benchmark and suggests that far stronger action is needed.

Country examples

Lists of countries

The top 40 countries emitting all greenhouse gases, showing both that derived from all sources including land clearance and forestry and also the CO
2
component excluding those sources. Per capita figures are included. "World Resources Institute data". http://www.wri.org/resources/data-sets/cait-historical-emissions-data-countries-us-states-unfccc. . Indonesia and Brazil show very much higher than on graphs simply showing fossil fuel use.

In 2019, China, the United States, India, the EU27+UK, Russia, and Japan - the world's largest CO
2
emitters - together accounted for 51% of the population, 62.5% of global gross domestic product, 62% of total global fossil fuel consumption and emitted 67% of total global fossil CO
2
. Emissions from these five countries and the EU28 show different changes in 2019 compared to 2018: the largest relative increase is found for China (+3.4%), followed by India (+1.6%). On the contrary, the EU27+UK (-3.8%), the United States (-2.6%), Japan (-2.1%) and Russia (-0.8%) reduced their fossil CO
2
emissions.[178]

2019 Fossil CO
2
emissions by country[178]
Country total emissions
(Mton)
Share
(%)
per capita
(ton)
per GDP
(ton/k$)
Global Total 38,016.57 100.00 4.93 0.29
 China 11,535.20 30.34 8.12 0.51
 United States 5,107.26 13.43 15.52 0.25
EU27+UK 3,303.97 8.69 6.47 0.14
 India 2,597.36 6.83 1.90 0.28
 Russia 1,792.02 4.71 12.45 0.45
 Japan 1,153.72 3.03 9.09 0.22
International Shipping 730.26 1.92 - -
 Germany 702.60 1.85 8.52 0.16
 Iran 701.99 1.85 8.48 0.68
 South Korea 651.87 1.71 12.70 0.30
International Aviation 627.48 1.65 - -
 Indonesia 625.66 1.65 2.32 0.20
 Saudi Arabia 614.61 1.62 18.00 0.38
 Canada 584.85 1.54 15.69 0.32
 South Africa 494.86 1.30 8.52 0.68
 Mexico 485.00 1.28 3.67 0.19
 Brazil 478.15 1.26 2.25 0.15
 Australia 433.38 1.14 17.27 0.34
 Turkey 415.78 1.09 5.01 0.18
 United Kingdom 364.91 0.96 5.45 0.12
 Italy,  San Marino and the Holy See 331.56 0.87 5.60 0.13
 Poland 317.65 0.84 8.35 0.25
 France and  Monaco 314.74 0.83 4.81 0.10
 Vietnam 305.25 0.80 3.13 0.39
 Kazakhstan 277.36 0.73 14.92 0.57
 Taiwan 276.78 0.73 11.65 0.23
 Thailand 275.06 0.72 3.97 0.21
 Spain and Andorra 259.31 0.68 5.58 0.13
 Egypt 255.37 0.67 2.52 0.22
 Malaysia 248.83 0.65 7.67 0.27
 Pakistan 223.63 0.59 1.09 0.22
 United Arab Emirates 222.61 0.59 22.99 0.34
 Argentina 199.41 0.52 4.42 0.20
 Iraq 197.61 0.52 4.89 0.46
 Ukraine 196.40 0.52 4.48 0.36
 Algeria 180.57 0.47 4.23 0.37
 Netherlands 156.41 0.41 9.13 0.16
 Philippines 150.64 0.40 1.39 0.16
 Bangladesh 110.16 0.29 0.66 0.14
 Venezuela 110.06 0.29 3.36 0.39
 Qatar 106.53 0.28 38.82 0.41
 Czechia 105.69 0.28 9.94 0.25
 Belgium 104.41 0.27 9.03 0.18
 Nigeria 100.22 0.26 0.50 0.10
 Kuwait 98.95 0.26 23.29 0.47
 Uzbekistan 94.99 0.25 2.90 0.40
 Oman 92.78 0.24 18.55 0.67
 Turkmenistan 90.52 0.24 15.23 0.98
 Chile 89.89 0.24 4.90 0.20
 Colombia 86.55 0.23 1.74 0.12
 Romania 78.63 0.21 4.04 0.14
 Morocco 73.91 0.19 2.02 0.27
 Austria 72.36 0.19 8.25 0.14
 Serbia and Montenegro 70.69 0.19 7.55 0.44
 Israel and  Palestine 68.33 0.18 7.96 0.18
 Belarus 66.34 0.17 7.03 0.37
 Greece 65.57 0.17 5.89 0.20
 Peru 56.29 0.15 1.71 0.13
 Singapore 53.37 0.14 9.09 0.10
 Hungary 53.18 0.14 5.51 0.17
 Libya 52.05 0.14 7.92 0.51
 Portugal 48.47 0.13 4.73 0.14
 Myanmar 48.31 0.13 0.89 0.17
 Norway 47.99 0.13 8.89 0.14
 Sweden 44.75 0.12 4.45 0.08
 Hong Kong 44.02 0.12 5.88 0.10
 Finland 43.41 0.11 7.81 0.16
 Bulgaria 43.31 0.11 6.20 0.27
 North Korea 42.17 0.11 1.64 0.36
 Ecuador 40.70 0.11 2.38 0.21
  Switzerland and  Liechtenstein 39.37 0.10 4.57 0.07
 New Zealand 38.67 0.10 8.07 0.18
 Ireland 36.55 0.10 7.54 0.09
 Slovakia 35.99 0.09 6.60 0.20
 Azerbaijan 35.98 0.09 3.59 0.25
 Mongolia 35.93 0.09 11.35 0.91
 Bahrain 35.44 0.09 21.64 0.48
 Bosnia and Herzegovina 33.50 0.09 9.57 0.68
 Trinidad and Tobago 32.74 0.09 23.81 0.90
 Tunisia 32.07 0.08 2.72 0.25
 Denmark 31.12 0.08 5.39 0.09
 Cuba 31.04 0.08 2.70 0.11
 Syria 29.16 0.08 1.58 1.20
 Jordan 28.34 0.07 2.81 0.28
 Sri Lanka 27.57 0.07 1.31 0.10
 Lebanon 27.44 0.07 4.52 0.27
 Dominican Republic 27.28 0.07 2.48 0.14
 Angola 25.82 0.07 0.81 0.12
 Bolivia 24.51 0.06 2.15 0.24
 Sudan and  South Sudan 22.57 0.06 0.40 0.13
 Guatemala 21.20 0.06 1.21 0.15
 Kenya 19.81 0.05 0.38 0.09
 Croatia 19.12 0.05 4.62 0.16
 Estonia 18.50 0.05 14.19 0.38
 Ethiopia 18.25 0.05 0.17 0.07
 Ghana 16.84 0.04 0.56 0.10
 Cambodia 16.49 0.04 1.00 0.23
 New Caledonia 15.66 0.04 55.25 1.67
 Slovenia 15.37 0.04 7.38 0.19
   Nepal 15.02 0.04 0.50 0.15
 Lithuania 13.77 0.04 4.81 0.13
 Côte d'Ivoire 13.56 0.04 0.53 0.10
 Georgia 13.47 0.04 3.45 0.24
 Tanzania 13.34 0.04 0.22 0.09
 Kyrgyzstan 11.92 0.03 1.92 0.35
 Panama 11.63 0.03 2.75 0.09
 Afghanistan 11.00 0.03 0.30 0.13
 Yemen 10.89 0.03 0.37 0.17
 Zimbabwe 10.86 0.03 0.63 0.26
 Honduras 10.36 0.03 1.08 0.19
 Cameroon 10.10 0.03 0.40 0.11
 Senegal 9.81 0.03 0.59 0.18
 Luxembourg 9.74 0.03 16.31 0.14
 Mozambique 9.26 0.02 0.29 0.24
 Moldova 9.23 0.02 2.29 0.27
 Costa Rica 8.98 0.02 1.80 0.09
 North Macedonia 8.92 0.02 4.28 0.26
 Tajikistan 8.92 0.02 0.96 0.28
 Paraguay 8.47 0.02 1.21 0.09
 Latvia 8.38 0.02 4.38 0.14
 Benin 8.15 0.02 0.69 0.21
 Mauritania 7.66 0.02 1.64 0.33
 Zambia 7.50 0.02 0.41 0.12
 Jamaica 7.44 0.02 2.56 0.26
 Cyprus 7.41 0.02 6.19 0.21
 El Salvador 7.15 0.02 1.11 0.13
 Botswana 7.04 0.02 2.96 0.17
 Brunei 7.02 0.02 15.98 0.26
 Laos 6.78 0.02 0.96 0.12
 Uruguay 6.56 0.02 1.89 0.09
 Armenia 5.92 0.02 2.02 0.15
 Curaçao 5.91 0.02 36.38 1.51
 Nicaragua 5.86 0.02 0.92 0.17
 Congo 5.80 0.02 1.05 0.33
 Albania 5.66 0.01 1.93 0.14
 Uganda 5.34 0.01 0.12 0.06
 Namibia 4.40 0.01 1.67 0.18
 Mauritius 4.33 0.01 3.41 0.15
 Madagascar 4.20 0.01 0.16 0.09
 Papua New Guinea 4.07 0.01 0.47 0.11
 Iceland 3.93 0.01 11.53 0.19
 Puerto Rico 3.91 0.01 1.07 0.04
 Barbados 3.83 0.01 13.34 0.85
 Burkina Faso 3.64 0.01 0.18 0.08
 Haiti 3.58 0.01 0.32 0.18
 Gabon 3.48 0.01 1.65 0.11
 Equatorial Guinea 3.47 0.01 2.55 0.14
 Réunion 3.02 0.01 3.40 -
 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2.98 0.01 0.03 0.03
 Guinea 2.92 0.01 0.22 0.09
 Togo 2.85 0.01 0.35 0.22
 Bahamas 2.45 0.01 6.08 0.18
 Niger 2.36 0.01 0.10 0.08
 Bhutan 2.12 0.01 2.57 0.24
 Suriname 2.06 0.01 3.59 0.22
 Martinique 1.95 0.01 5.07 -
 Guadeloupe 1.87 0.00 4.17 -
 Malawi 1.62 0.00 0.08 0.08
 Guyana 1.52 0.00 1.94 0.20
 Sierra Leone 1.40 0.00 0.18 0.10
 Fiji 1.36 0.00 1.48 0.11
 Palau 1.33 0.00 59.88 4.09
 Macao 1.27 0.00 1.98 0.02
 Liberia 1.21 0.00 0.24 0.17
 Rwanda 1.15 0.00 0.09 0.04
 Eswatini 1.14 0.00 0.81 0.11
 Djibouti 1.05 0.00 1.06 0.20
 Seychelles 1.05 0.00 10.98 0.37
 Malta 1.04 0.00 2.41 0.05
 Mali 1.03 0.00 0.05 0.02
 Cabo Verde 1.02 0.00 1.83 0.26
 Somalia 0.97 0.00 0.06 0.57
 Maldives 0.91 0.00 2.02 0.09
 Chad 0.89 0.00 0.06 0.04
 Aruba 0.78 0.00 7.39 0.19
 Eritrea 0.75 0.00 0.14 0.08
 Lesotho 0.75 0.00 0.33 0.13
 Gibraltar 0.69 0.00 19.88 0.45
 French Guiana 0.61 0.00 2.06 -
 French Polynesia 0.60 0.00 2.08 0.10
 The Gambia 0.59 0.00 0.27 0.11
 Greenland 0.54 0.00 9.47 0.19
 Antigua and Barbuda 0.51 0.00 4.90 0.24
 Central African Republic 0.49 0.00 0.10 0.11
 Guinea-Bissau 0.44 0.00 0.22 0.11
 Cayman Islands 0.40 0.00 6.38 0.09
 Timor-Leste 0.38 0.00 0.28 0.10
 Belize 0.37 0.00 0.95 0.14
 Bermuda 0.35 0.00 5.75 0.14
 Burundi 0.34 0.00 0.03 0.04
 Saint Lucia 0.30 0.00 1.65 0.11
 Western Sahara 0.30 0.00 0.51 -
 Grenada 0.23 0.00 2.10 0.12
 Comoros 0.21 0.00 0.25 0.08
 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.19 0.00 3.44 0.14
 São Tomé and Príncipe 0.16 0.00 0.75 0.19
 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.15 0.00 1.32 0.11
 Samoa 0.14 0.00 0.70 0.11
 Solomon Islands 0.14 0.00 0.22 0.09
 Tonga 0.13 0.00 1.16 0.20
 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.13 0.00 3.70 0.13
 British Virgin Islands 0.12 0.00 3.77 0.17
 Dominica 0.10 0.00 1.38 0.12
 Vanuatu 0.09 0.00 0.30 0.09
 Saint Pierre and Miquelon 0.06 0.00 9.72 -
 Cook Islands 0.04 0.00 2.51 -
 Falkland Islands 0.03 0.00 10.87 -
 Kiribati 0.03 0.00 0.28 0.13
 Anguilla 0.02 0.00 1.54 0.12
 Saint Helena, Template:Country data Ascension and  Tristan da Cunha 0.02 0.00 3.87 -
 Faroe Islands 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00

United States

Though the U.S.'s per capita and per GDP emissions have declined significantly, the raw numerical decline in emissions is much less substantial.[179]

China

India

Society and culture

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic

In 2020, carbon dioxide emissions fell by 6.4% or 2.3 billion tonnes globally.[180] In April 2020, NO
x
emissions fell by up to 30%.[181] In China, lockdowns and other measures resulted in a 26% decrease in coal consumption, and a 50% reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions.[182] Greenhouse gas emissions rebounded later in the pandemic as many countries began lifting restrictions, with the direct impact of pandemic policies having a negligible long-term impact on climate change.[180][183]

See also


References

  1. "Territorial (MtCO
    2
    )"
    . http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/en/CO2-emissions.
      (choose "Chart view"; use download link)
    ● Data for 2020 is also presented in Popovich, Nadja; Plumer, Brad (12 November 2021). "Who Has The Most Historical Responsibility for Climate Change?". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/11/12/climate/cop26-emissions-compensation.html. 
    ● Source for country populations: "List of the populations of the world's countries, dependencies, and territories". Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/print/article/2156538. 
  2. "Chapter 2: Emissions trends and drivers". Ipcc_Ar6_Wgiii. 2022. https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FinalDraft_Chapter02.pdf. Retrieved 2022-04-04. 
  3. "Global Carbon Project (GCP)" (in en). https://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/18/highlights.htm. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 "Methane vs. Carbon Dioxide: A Greenhouse Gas Showdown". 30 September 2014. http://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/methane-vs-carbon-dioxide-a-greenhouse-gas-showdown/. 
  5. Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (2020-05-11). "CO
    2
    and Greenhouse Gas Emissions"
    . Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector.
     
  6. 6.0 6.1 widworld_admin (2021-10-20). "The World #InequalityReport 2022 presents the most up-to-date & complete data on inequality worldwide" (in fr-FR). https://wir2022.wid.world/chapter-6/. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 "Carbon inequality in 2030: Per capita consumption emissions and the 1.5C goal – IEEP AISBL" (in en-GB). https://ieep.eu/publications/carbon-inequality-in-2030-per-capita-consumption-emissions-and-the-1-5c-goal/. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 Gore, Tim (2021-11-05). Carbon Inequality in 2030: Per capita consumption emissions and the 1.5 °C goal. Institute for European Environmental Policy. doi:10.21201/2021.8274. ISBN 9781787488274. http://hdl.handle.net/10546/621305. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 "AR6 Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change — IPCC". https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-3/. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Grubb, M. (July–September 2003). "The economics of the Kyoto protocol". World Economics 4 (3). http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/rstaff/grubb/publications/J36.pdf. 
  11. "What is a carbon footprint". https://www.conservation.org/stories/what-is-a-carbon-footprint. 
  12. IPCC, 2022: Annex I: Glossary [van Diemen, R., J.B.R. Matthews, V. Möller, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C. Méndez, A. Reisinger, S. Semenov (eds)]. In IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.020
  13. 13.0 13.1 "Carbon Accounting" (in en-US). https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/esg/carbon-accounting/. 
  14. 14.0 14.1 Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (11 May 2020). "Greenhouse gas emissions". Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/greenhouse-gas-emissions. Retrieved 22 June 2021. 
  15. Dhakal, S., J.C. Minx, F.L. Toth, A. Abdel-Aziz, M.J. Figueroa Meza, K. Hubacek, I.G.C. Jonckheere, Yong-Gun Kim, G.F. Nemet, S. Pachauri, X.C. Tan, T. Wiedmann, 2022: Chapter 2: Emissions Trends and Drivers. In IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.004
  16. "Water Vapor" (in en). 2023-06-30. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/global-maps/MYDAL2_M_SKY_WV. 
  17. Johnston, Chris; Milman, Oliver; Vidal, John (15 October 2016). "Climate change: global deal reached to limit use of hydrofluorocarbons" (in en). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/oct/15/climate-change-environmentalists-hail-deal-to-limit-use-of-hydrofluorocarbons. 
  18. "Climate change: 'Monumental' deal to cut HFCs, fastest growing greenhouse gases". BBC News. 15 October 2016. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-37665529. 
  19. "Nations, Fighting Powerful Refrigerant That Warms Planet, Reach Landmark Deal". The New York Times. 15 October 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/15/world/africa/kigali-deal-hfc-air-conditioners.html. 
  20. Vaara, Miska (2003), Use of ozone depleting substances in laboratories, TemaNord, p. 170, ISBN 978-9289308847, http://www.norden.org/en/publications/publications/2003-516/ 
  21. Montreal Protocol
  22. 22.0 22.1 "NOAA's Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (An Introduction)". NOAA. 2020. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/. 
  23. Fox, Alex. "Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reaches New High Despite Pandemic Emissions Reduction" (in en). https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-reaches-new-high-despite-pandemic-emissions-reduction-180977945/. 
  24. "Climate Change: Causation Archives" (in en-US). http://earthcharts.org/category/climate-change/climate-change-causation/. 
  25. "It's critical to tackle coal emissions – Analysis" (in en-GB). https://www.iea.org/commentaries/it-s-critical-to-tackle-coal-emissions. 
  26. US EPA, OAR (12 January 2016). "Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data" (in en). https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data. 
  27. Steinfeld, H.; Gerber, P.; Wassenaar, T.; Castel, V.; Rosales, M.; de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock's long shadow (Report). FAO Livestock, Environment and Development (LEAD) Initiative. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.htm. 
  28. Ciais, Phillipe et al.. "Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles". in Stocker Thomas F.. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. IPCC. p. 473. http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf. 
  29. Chrobak, Ula (14 May 2021). "Fighting climate change means taking laughing gas seriously". Knowable Magazine. doi:10.1146/knowable-051321-2. https://knowablemagazine.org/article/food-environment/2021/nitrous-oxide-greenhouse-gas-agriculture. Retrieved 8 March 2022. 
  30. "Global Methane Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities". 2020. https://www.globalmethane.org/documents/gmi-mitigation-factsheet.pdf. 
  31. "Sources of methane emissions". 20 August 2020. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/sources-of-methane-emissions-2. 
  32. "Key facts and findings". Food and Agricultural Organization. n.d.. https://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/197623/icode/. 
  33. PBL (21 December 2020). "Trends in Global CO
    2
    and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions; 2020 Report"
    (in en). https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/trends-in-global-co2-and-total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2020-report.
     
  34. IPCC (2019). "Summary for Policy Makers". IPCC: 99. https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_SummaryForPolicymakers.pdf. Retrieved 2022-04-04. 
  35. Dodman, David (April 2009). "Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories". Environment and Urbanization 21 (1): 185–201. doi:10.1177/0956247809103016. ISSN 0956-2478. Bibcode2009EnUrb..21..185D. 
  36. "Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study says" (in en). 10 July 2017. http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10/100-fossil-fuel-companies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change. 
  37. Gustin, Georgina (9 July 2017). "25 Fossil Fuel Producers Responsible for Half Global Emissions in Past 3 Decades". https://insideclimatenews.org/news/09072017/fossil-fuel-companies-responsible-global-emissions-cdp-report/. 
  38. 38.0 38.1 38.2 38.3 Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max; Rosado, Pablo (2020-05-11). "CO
    2
    and Greenhouse Gas Emissions"
    . Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions.
     
  39. 39.0 39.1 "Global CO
    2
    emissions: annual increase halves in 2008"
    . Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) website. 25 June 2009. http://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/2009/Global-CO2-emissions-annual-increase-halves-in-2008.html.
     
  40. "Global Carbon Mechanisms: Emerging lessons and implications (CTC748)". Carbon Trust. March 2009. p. 24. http://www.carbontrust.com/resources/reports/advice/global-carbon-mechanisms. 
  41. Vaughan, Adam (7 December 2015). "Global emissions to fall for first time during a period of economic growth". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/07/global-emissions-to-fall-for-first-time-during-a-period-of-economic-growth. 
  42. "CO
    2
    emissions per capita vs GDP per capita"
    . https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co2-emissions-vs-gdp.
     
  43. 43.0 43.1 43.2 Friedlingstein, Pierre; O'Sullivan, Michael; Jones, Matthew W.; Anddrew, Robbie M. et al. (11 November 2022). "Global Carbon Budget 2022 (Data description paper)". Earth System Science Data 14: 4811–4900. doi:10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022. Bibcode2022ESSD...14.4811F. https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/14/4811/2022/.  Data available for download at Our World in Data (cumulative and annual and per capita).
  44. 44.0 44.1 Bader, N.; Bleichwitz, R. (2009). "Measuring urban greenhouse gas emissions: The challenge of comparability". S.A.P.I.EN.S. 2 (3). http://sapiens.revues.org/index854.html. Retrieved 11 September 2011. 
  45. "Transcript: The Path Forward: Al Gore on Climate and the Economy". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/04/22/transcript-path-forward-al-gore-climate-economy/. 
  46. 46.0 46.1 46.2 46.3 46.4 46.5 46.6 Banuri, T. (1996). Equity and social considerations. In: Climate change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (J.P. Bruce et al. Eds.). This version: Printed by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, and New York. PDF version: IPCC website. ISBN 978-0521568548. https://archive.org/details/climatechange1990000unse_h1m9. 
  47. World energy outlook 2007 edition – China and India insights. International Energy Agency (IEA), Head of Communication and Information Office, 9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France. 2007. p. 600. ISBN 978-9264027305. http://www.iea.org/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=1927. Retrieved 4 May 2010. 
  48. Holtz-Eakin, D. (1995). "Stoking the fires? CO
    2
    emissions and economic growth"
    . Journal of Public Economics 57 (1): 85–101. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(94)01449-X. http://www.nber.org/papers/w4248.pdf.
     
  49. "Selected Development Indicators" (PDF). World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. 2010. Tables A1 and A2. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7987-5. ISBN 978-0821379875. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/477365-1327504426766/8389626-1327510418796/Statistical-Annex.pdf. 
  50. Helm, D. (10 December 2007). Too Good To Be True? The UK's Climate Change Record. p. 3. http://www.dieterhelm.co.uk/sites/default/files/Carbon_record_2007_0.pdf. 
  51. 51.0 51.1 51.2 World Energy Outlook 2009, Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA), 2009, pp. 179–80, ISBN 978-9264061309, http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2009/weo2009.pdf, retrieved 27 December 2011 
  52. 52.0 52.1 Davis, S.J.; K. Caldeira (8 March 2010). "Consumption-based Accounting of CO
    2
    Emissions"
    (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (12): 5687–5692. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906974107. PMID 20212122. PMC 2851800. Bibcode2010PNAS..107.5687D. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/02/23/0906974107.full.pdf+html. Retrieved 18 April 2011.
     
  53. Herzog, T. (November 2006). Yamashita, M.B.. ed. Target: intensity – an analysis of greenhouse gas intensity targets. World Resources Institute. ISBN 978-1569736388. http://pdf.wri.org/target_intensity.pdf. Retrieved 11 April 2011. 
  54. Botzen, W.J.W. (2008). "Cumulative CO
    2
    emissions: shifting international responsibilities for climate debt". Climate Policy 8 (6): 570. doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0539. Bibcode2008CliPo...8..569B.
     
  55. Buis, Alan (Oct 19, 2019). "The Atmosphere: Getting a Handle on Carbon Dioxide". https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2915/the-atmosphere-getting-a-handle-on-carbon-dioxide. 
  56. "Methane and climate change – Global Methane Tracker 2022 – Analysis" (in en-GB). https://www.iea.org/reports/global-methane-tracker-2022/methane-and-climate-change. 
  57. Prather, Michael J.; Hsu, Juno; DeLuca, Nicole M.; Jackman, Charles H.; Oman, Luke D.; Douglass, Anne R.; Fleming, Eric L.; Strahan, Susan E. et al. (2015-06-16). "Measuring and modeling the lifetime of nitrous oxide including its variability" (in en). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 120 (11): 5693–5705. doi:10.1002/2015JD023267. ISSN 2169-897X. PMID 26900537. Bibcode2015JGRD..120.5693P. 
  58. "Climate Watch - Historical Emissions Data". World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/data/climate-watch-historical-emissions-data-countries-us-states-unfccc. 
  59. 59.0 59.1 59.2 Höhne, N. (24 September 2010). "Contributions of individual countries' emissions to climate change and their uncertainty". Climatic Change 106 (3): 359–91. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9930-6. http://www.gcca.eu/usr/documents/Contributions_Individual_countries_201011229410.pdf. 
  60. Specktor, Brandon (1 October 2019). "Humans Are Disturbing Earth's Carbon Cycle More Than the Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid Did". https://www.livescience.com/anthropogenic-warming-like-dinosaur-killing-asteroid.html. 
  61. "Transport emissions" (in en). https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/transport-emissions_en. 
  62. US EPA, OAR (10 September 2015). "Carbon Pollution from Transportation" (in en). https://www.epa.gov/transportation-air-pollution-and-climate-change/carbon-pollution-transportation. 
  63. "Rail and waterborne — best for low-carbon motorised transport — European Environment Agency" (in en). https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/rail-and-waterborne-transport. 
  64. "Luxembourg 2020 – Analysis" (in en-GB). https://www.iea.org/reports/luxembourg-2020. 
  65. Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (11 May 2020). "CO
    2
    and Greenhouse Gas Emissions"
    . Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector.
     
  66. "Why The Building Sector? – Architecture 2030" (in en-US). https://architecture2030.org/why-the-building-sector/. 
  67. "Global Assessment: Urgent steps must be taken to reduce methane emissions this decade". 6 May 2021. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/global-assessment-urgent-steps-must-be-taken-reduce-methane. 
  68. 68.0 68.1 Friedlingstein, Pierre; O'Sullivan, Michael; Jones, Matthew W.; Andrew, Robbie M.; Hauck, Judith; Olsen, Are; Peters, Glen P.; Peters, Wouter et al. (2020). "Global Carbon Budget 2020" (in en). Earth System Science Data 12 (4): 3269–3340. doi:10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020. ISSN 1866-3516. Bibcode2020ESSD...12.3269F. https://boris.unibe.ch/153200/1/essd-12-3269-2020.pdf. 
  69. "Global Carbon Budget 2019". https://www.icos-cp.eu/science-and-impact/global-carbon-budget/2019. 
  70. Raupach, M.R. et al. (2007). "Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO
    2
    emissions"
    . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 (24): 10288–93. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700609104. PMID 17519334. PMC 1876160. Bibcode2007PNAS..10410288R. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0700609104v1.pdf.
     
  71. The cited paper uses the term "start date" instead of "base year".
  72. Kühne, Kjell; Bartsch, Nils; Tate, Ryan Driskell; Higson, Julia; Habet, André (2022). ""Carbon Bombs" - Mapping key fossil fuel projects" (in en). Energy Policy 166: 112950. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112950. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/189177/1/1-s2.0-S0301421522001756-main.pdf. 
  73. "Global Carbon Budget - Latest Data". Global Carbon Project. https://www.globalcarbonbudgetdata.org/latest-data.html. 
  74. Olivier J.G.J. (2022), Trends in global CO
    2
    and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2021 summary report
    . PBL Netherlands, Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
  75. IGSD (2013). "Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCPs)". http://www.igsd.org/initiatives/slcps/. 
  76. Zaelke, Durwood; Borgford-Parnell, Nathan; Andersen, Stephen; Picolotti, Romina; Clare, Dennis; Sun, Xiaopu; Gabrielle, Danielle (2013). "Primer on Short-Lived Climate Pollutants". Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development. pp. 3. http://www.igsd.org/documents/PrimeronShort-LivedClimatePollutantsNovemberElectronicversion.pdf. 
  77. using 100 year global warming potential from IPCC-AR4
  78. Dreyfus, Gabrielle B.; Xu, Yangyang; Shindell, Drew T.; Zaelke, Durwood; Ramanathan, Veerabhadran (31 May 2022). "Mitigating climate disruption in time: A self-consistent approach for avoiding both near-term and long-term global warming" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (22): e2123536119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2123536119. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 35605122. Bibcode2022PNAS..11923536D. 
  79. 79.0 79.1 79.2 79.3 79.4 79.5 79.6 79.7 79.8 79.9 Olivier J.G.J. and Peters J.A.H.W. (2020), Trends in global CO
    2
    and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2020 report
    . PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
  80. Lombrana, Laura Millan; Warren, Hayley; Rathi, Akshat (2020). "Measuring the Carbon-Dioxide Cost of Last Year's Worldwide Wildfires". Bloomberg L.P.. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-fire-emissions/. 
  81. Global fire annual emissions (Report). Global Fire Emissions Database. http://www.globalfiredata.org/_plots/annual_emissions.pdf. 
  82. World Meteorological Organization (January 2019). "Scientific Assessment of ozone Depletion: 2018". Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project 58: A3 (see Table A1). https://ozone.unep.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/SAP-2018-Assessment-report.pdf. 
  83. Thompson, R.L; Lassaletta, L.; Patra, P.K (2019). et al.. "Acceleration of global N2O emissions seen from two decades of atmospheric inversion". Nature Climate Change 9 (12): 993–998. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0613-7. Bibcode2019NatCC...9..993T. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/16173/1/N2O_trends_revision2_v1_clean.pdf. 
  84. "Hydrogen 'twice as powerful a greenhouse gas as previously thought': UK government study". 8 April 2022. https://www.rechargenews.com/energy-transition/hydrogen-twice-as-powerful-a-greenhouse-gas-as-previously-thought-uk-government-study/2-1-1200115. 
  85. Ocko, Illisa; Hamburg, Steven (20 July 2022). "Climate consequences of hydrogen emissions". Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22 (14): 9349–9368. doi:10.5194/acp-22-9349-2022. Bibcode2022ACP....22.9349O. https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-91/acp-2022-91.pdf. Retrieved 25 April 2023. 
  86. Cooper, Jasmin; Dubey, Luke; Bakkaloglu, Semra; Hawkes, Adam (2022-07-15). "Hydrogen emissions from the hydrogen value chain-emissions profile and impact to global warming". Science of the Total Environment 830: 154624. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154624. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 35307429. Bibcode2022ScTEn.830o4624C. 
  87. Bond (2013). "Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment". J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118 (11): 5380–5552. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171. Bibcode2013JGRD..118.5380B. 
  88. Ramanathan, V.; Carmichael, G. (April 2008). "Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon". Nature Geoscience 1 (4): 221–227. doi:10.1038/ngeo156. Bibcode2008NatGe...1..221R. 
  89. "Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector". 6 March 2020. http://earthcharts.org/emissions-sources/. 
  90. 90.0 90.1 90.2 "Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options | UNECE". https://unece.org/sed/documents/2021/10/reports/life-cycle-assessment-electricity-generation-options. 
  91. IEA, CO
    2
    Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018: Highlights (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2018) p.98
  92. IEA, CO
    2
    Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018: Highlights (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2018) p.101
  93. "Emissions". https://www.iea.org/geco/emissions/. 
  94. "We have too many fossil-fuel power plants to meet climate goals" (in en). 1 July 2019. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/07/we-have-too-many-fossil-fuel-power-plants-to-meet-climate-goals/. 
  95. "March: Tracking the decoupling of electricity demand and associated CO
    2
    emissions"
    . https://www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2019/march/tracking-the-decoupling-of-electricity-demand-and-associated-co2-emissions.html.
     
  96. Grant, Don; Zelinka, David; Mitova, Stefania (13 July 2021). "Reducing CO
    2
    emissions by targeting the world's hyper-polluting power plants"
    . Environmental Research Letters 16 (9): 094022. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac13f1. ISSN 1748-9326. Bibcode2021ERL....16i4022G. https://scholar.colorado.edu/downloads/9z903115h.
     
  97. Emission Trends and Drivers, Ch 2 in "Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change" https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
  98. 98.0 98.1 Feng, Yu; Zeng, Zhenzhong; Searchinger, Timothy D.; Ziegler, Alan D.; Wu, Jie; Wang, Dashan; He, Xinyue; Elsen, Paul R. et al. (28 February 2022). "Doubling of annual forest carbon loss over the tropics during the early twenty-first century" (in en). Nature Sustainability 5 (5): 444–451. doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00854-3. ISSN 2398-9629. Bibcode2022NatSu...5..444F. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/185396/18/s41893-022-00854-3.pdf. 
  99. "Deforestation emissions far higher than previously thought, study finds" (in en). The Guardian. 28 February 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/28/deforestation-emissions-far-higher-than-previously-thought-study-finds-aoe. 
  100. Fig. SPM.2c from Working Group III (4 April 2022). Climate Change 2022 / Mitigation of Climate Change / Summary for Policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. p. 10. ISBN 978-92-9169-160-9. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_SummaryForPolicymakers.pdf.  GDP data is for 2019.
  101. B. Metz; O.R. Davidson; P.R. Bosch et al., eds., Annex I: Glossary J–P, http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg3/en/annex1sglossary-j-p.html 
  102. Markandya, A. (2001). "7.3.5 Cost Implications of Alternative GHG Emission Reduction Options and Carbon Sinks". in B. Metz. Costing Methodologies. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Print version: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, and New York. This version: GRID-Arendal website. ISBN 978-0521015028. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg3/293.htm. Retrieved 11 April 2011. 
  103. Page, S.; Siegert, F.; Rieley, J.; Boehm, H.; Jaya, A.; Limin, S. (2002). "The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997". Nature 420 (6911): 61–65. doi:10.1038/nature01131. PMID 12422213. Bibcode2002Natur.420...61P. 
  104. Lazaroff, Cat (2002-11-08). "Indonesian Wildfires Accelerated Global Warming". Environment New Service. http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/nov2002/2002-11-08-06.asp. 
  105. Pearce, Fred (6 November 2004). "Massive peat burn is speeding climate change". New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6613. 
  106. Ge, Mengpin; Friedrich, Johannes; Vigna, Leandro (6 February 2020) (in en). 4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors. https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/02/greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-country-sector. Retrieved 30 December 2020. 
  107. "Cars, planes, trains: where do CO
    2
    emissions from transport come from?"
    . https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport.
     
  108. "EU countries agree to 30 percent cut in truck CO
    2
    emissions"
    . Reuters. 20 December 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-autos-emissions/eu-countries-agree-to-30-percent-cut-in-truck-co2-emissions-idUSKCN1OJ1ZC.
     
  109. Walker, Tony R.; Adebambo, Olubukola; Del Aguila Feijoo, Monica C.; Elhaimer, Elias; Hossain, Tahazzud; Edwards, Stuart Johnston; Morrison, Courtney E.; Romo, Jessica et al. (2019). "Environmental Effects of Marine Transportation". World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation. pp. 505–530. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-805052-1.00030-9. ISBN 978-0-12-805052-1. 
  110. Vidal, John (2009-04-09). "Health risks of shipping pollution have been 'underestimated'". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/apr/09/shipping-pollution. 
  111. "Infrastructure Podcast; Decarbonized Shipping". World Bank. 2022-03-16. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/podcast/2022/03/16/decarbonized-shipping-reducing-the-dependence-on-fossil-fuels. 
  112. Kersing, Arjen; Stone, Matt (2022-01-25). "Charting global shipping's path to zero carbon". McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel-logistics-and-infrastructure/our-insights/charting-global-shippings-path-to-zero-carbon. 
  113. Raucci, Carlo (2019-06-06). "Three pathways to shipping's decarbonization". Global Maritime Forum. https://www.globalmaritimeforum.org/news/three-pathways-to-shippings-decarbonization. 
  114. Brandon Graver; Kevin Zhang (September 2019). "CO
    2
    emissions from commercial aviation, 2018"
    . International Council on Clean Transportation. https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_CO2-commercl-aviation-2018_20190918.pdf.
     
  115. Davidson, Jordan (4 September 2020). "Aviation Accounts for 3.5% of Global Warming Caused by Humans, New Research Says". Ecowatch. https://www.ecowatch.com/aviation-emissions-global-warming-2647461303.html. 
  116. "Average passenger aircraft emissions and energy consumption per passenger kilometre in Finland 2008". http://lipasto.vtt.fi/yksikkopaastot/henkiloliikennee/ilmaliikennee/ilmae.htm. 
  117. 117.0 117.1 Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana; Khosla, Radhika; Bernhardt, Rob; Chan, Yi Chieh; Vérez, David; Hu, Shan; Cabeza, Luisa F. (2020). "Advances Toward a Net-Zero Global Building Sector". Annual Review of Environment and Resources 45: 227–269. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-045843. 
  118. "Why the building sector?". https://architecture2030.org/buildings_problem_why/. 
  119. Fowlie, Meredith; Greenstone, Michael; Wolfram, Catherine (2018-08-01). "Do Energy Efficiency Investments Deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program" (in en). The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (3): 1597–1644. doi:10.1093/qje/qjy005. ISSN 0033-5533. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/133/3/1597/4828342. Retrieved 2020-11-21. 
  120. "Sequestering Carbon in Buildings" (in en-US). 23 June 2017. http://www.greenenergytimes.org/2017/06/23/sequestering-carbon-in-buildings/. 
  121. "IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change". https://www.ipcc.ch/. 
  122. 122.0 122.1 122.2 122.3 International Energy Agency (2019). Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2019. Paris: IEA. ISBN 978-92-807-3768-4. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-status-report-for-buildings-and-construction-2019. Retrieved 2020-11-20. 
  123. "CoatingsTech - Coatings and Low-carbon Cement Technology" (in en). https://www.coatingstech-digital.org/coatingstech/library/item/july_2022/4025830/. 
  124. De Ras, Kevin; Van De Vijver, Ruben; Galvita, Vladimir V.; Marin, Guy B.; Van Geem, Kevin M. (2019-12-01). "Carbon capture and utilization in the steel industry: challenges and opportunities for chemical engineering" (in en). Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 26: 81–87. doi:10.1016/j.coche.2019.09.001. ISSN 2211-3398. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221133981930036X. Retrieved 2021-07-02. 
  125. Alter, Lloyd (1 April 2019). "Let's rename "Embodied Carbon" to "Upfront Carbon Emissions"" (in en). https://www.treehugger.com/green-architecture/lets-rename-embodied-carbon-upfront-carbon-emissions.html. 
  126. "New Buildings: Embodied Carbon" (in en-US). https://architecture2030.org/new-buildings-embodied/. 
  127. Pomponi, Francesco; Moncaster, Alice (2016). "Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment - What does the evidence say?". Journal of Environmental Management 181: 687–700. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036. PMID 27558830. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/260832. Retrieved 2021-07-27. 
  128. "The World's Biggest Emitter of Greenhouse Gases" (in en). Bloomberg.com. 17 March 2020. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-03-17/south-africa-living-near-the-world-s-biggest-emitting-plant. 
  129. Global, Regional, and National CO2 Emissions . In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres, 2005, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
  130. "Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership (GGFR)". The World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/gasflaringreduction. "previous redirect from web.worldbank.org" 
  131. Tsaia, I-Tsung; Al Alia, Meshayel; El Waddi, Sanaâ; Adnan Zarzourb, aOthman (2013). "Carbon Capture Regulation for The Steel and Aluminum Industries in the UAE: An Empirical Analysis". Energy Procedia 37: 7732–7740. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.719. ISSN 1876-6102. OCLC 5570078737. 
  132. Zheng, Jiajia; Suh, Sangwon (May 2019). "Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics" (in en). Nature Climate Change 9 (5): 374–378. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0459-z. ISSN 1758-6798. Bibcode2019NatCC...9..374Z. https://escholarship.org/content/qt8pp2t7v8/qt8pp2t7v8.pdf?t=qxd7cq. 
  133. "The Link Between Plastic Use and Climate Change: Nitty-gritty". 2009. https://stanfordmag.org/contents/the-link-between-plastic-use-and-climate-change-nitty-gritty. "... According to the EPA, approximately one ounce of carbon dioxide is emitted for each ounce of polyethylene (PET) produced. PET is the type of plastic most commonly used for beverage bottles. ...'" 
  134. Glazner, Elizabeth (21 November 2017). "Plastic Pollution and Climate Change". http://www.plasticpollutioncoalition.org/pft/2015/11/17/plastic-pollution-and-climate-change. 
  135. Blue, Marie-Luise. "What Is the Carbon Footprint of a Plastic Bottle?". Leaf Group Ltd. https://sciencing.com/carbon-footprint-plastic-bottle-12307187.html. 
  136. Royer, Sarah-Jeanne; Ferrón, Sara; Wilson, Samuel T.; Karl, David M. (1 August 2018). "Production of methane and ethylene from plastics in the environment". PLOS ONE 13 (Plastic, Climate Change): e0200574. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200574. PMID 30067755. Bibcode2018PLoSO..1300574R. 
  137. Rosane, Olivia (2 August 2018). "Study Finds New Reason to Ban Plastic: It Emits Methane in the Sun". Ecowatch. https://www.ecowatch.com/plastic-waste-could-contribute-to-climate-change-2592101036.html. 
  138. "Sweeping New Report on Global Environmental Impact of Plastics Reveals Severe Damage to Climate". https://www.ciel.org/news/plasticandclimate/. 
  139. Plastic & Climate The Hidden Costs of a Plastic Planet. Center for International Environmental Law, Environmental Integrity Project, FracTracker Alliance, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, 5 Gyres, and Break Free From Plastic.. May 2019. pp. 82–85. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Plastic-and-Climate-FINAL-2019.pdf. Retrieved 20 May 2019. 
  140. "World GHG Emissions Flow Chart". 2010. http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/asn-ecofys-2013-world-ghg-emissions-flow-chart-2010.pdf. 
  141. "Data Centres and Data Transmission Networks – Analysis" (in en-GB). https://www.iea.org/reports/data-centres-and-data-transmission-networks. 
  142. Freitag, Charlotte; Berners-Lee, Mike (December 2020). "The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations". arXiv:2102.02622 [physics.soc-ph].
  143. "The computer chip industry has a dirty climate secret" (in en). 18 September 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/sep/18/semiconductor-silicon-chips-carbon-footprint-climate. 
  144. "Working from home is erasing carbon emissions -- but for how long?" (in en-us). 19 May 2020. https://grist.org/climate/working-from-home-is-erasing-carbon-emissions-but-for-how-long/. 
  145. Cunliff, Colin (6 July 2020). "Beyond the Energy Techlash: The Real Climate Impacts of Information Technology" (in en). https://itif.org/publications/2020/07/06/beyond-energy-techlash-real-climate-impacts-information-technology. 
  146. Foteinis, Spyros (7 February 2018). "Bitcoin's alarming carbon footprint" (in en). Nature 554 (7691): 169. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-01625-x. Bibcode2018Natur.554..169F. 
  147. Krause, Max J.; Tolaymat, Thabet (November 2018). "Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies". Nature Sustainability 1 (11): 711–718. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0152-7. Bibcode2018NatSu...1..711K. 
  148. Davies, Pascale (26 February 2022). "Bitcoin mining is worse for the environment now since China banned it" (in en). https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/02/26/bitcoin-mining-was-actually-worse-for-the-environment-since-china-banned-it-a-new-study-sa. 
  149. Ponciano, Jonathan. "Bill Gates Sounds Alarm On Bitcoin's Energy Consumption–Here's Why Crypto Is Bad For Climate Change" (in en). https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanponciano/2021/03/09/bill-gates-bitcoin-crypto-climate-change/. 
  150. Huang, Jon; O'Neill, Claire; Tabuchi, Hiroko (3 September 2021). "Bitcoin Uses More Electricity Than Many Countries. How Is That Possible?" (in en-US). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/09/03/climate/bitcoin-carbon-footprint-electricity.html. 
  151. "Bitcoin energy consumption worldwide 2017-2021" (in en). https://www.statista.com/statistics/881472/worldwide-bitcoin-energy-consumption/. 
  152. Andrae, Anders; Edler, Tomas (2015). "On Global Electricity Usage of Communication Technology: Trends to 2030" (in en). Challenges 6 (1): 117–157. doi:10.3390/challe6010117. ISSN 2078-1547.  CC-BY icon.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  153. J. Eckelman, Matthew; Huang, Kaixin; Dubrow, Robert; D. Sherman, Jodi (December 2020). "Health Care Pollution And Public Health Damage In The United States: An Update". Health Affairs 39 (12): 2071–2079. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01247. PMID 33284703. 
  154. Eckelman, Matthew J.; Sherman, Jodi D. (April 2018). "Estimated Global Disease Burden From US Health Care Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions" (in en). American Journal of Public Health 108 (S2): S120–S122. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303846. ISSN 0090-0036. PMID 29072942. 
  155. "Environmental Impacts of Tourism – Global Level". UNEP. http://www.unep.org/resourceefficiency/Business/SectoralActivities/Tourism/TheTourismandEnvironmentProgramme/FactsandFiguresaboutTourism/ImpactsofTourism/EnvironmentalImpacts/EnvironmentalImpactsofTourism-GlobalLevel/tabid/78777/Default.aspx. 
  156. "IPCC Working Group III – Mitigation of Climate Change, Annex III: Technology - specific cost and performance parameters - Table A.III.2 (Emissions of selected electricity supply technologies (gCO 2eq/kWh))". IPCC. 2014. p. 1335. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_annex-iii.pdf#page=7. 
  157. Climate Equality: a Climate for the 99%. Oxfam International. November 2023. https://webassets.oxfamamerica.org/media/documents/cr-climate-equality-201123-en.pdf.  Fig. ES.2, Fig. ES.3, Box 1.2.
  158. 158.0 158.1 Cozzi, Laura; Chen, Olivia; Kim, Hyeji (22 February 2023). "The world's top 1% of emitters produce over 1000 times more CO
    2
    than the bottom 1%"
    . International Energy Agency (IEA). https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-world-s-top-1-of-emitters-produce-over-1000-times-more-co2-than-the-bottom-1.
      "Methodological note: ... The analysis accounts for energy-related CO2, and not other greenhouse gases, nor those related to land use and agriculture."
  159. Stevens, Harry (1 March 2023). "The United States has caused the most global warming. When will China pass it?". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2023/global-warming-carbon-emissions-china-us/. 
  160. Rapid Transition Alliance, 13 April 2021 "Cambridge Sustainability Commission Report on Scaling Behaviour Change" p. 20
  161. Emission trends and drivers, Ch 2 in "Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change". http://www.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  162. 162.0 162.1 Climate Change 2022 ipcc.ch
  163. Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (19 June 2020). "Scientists' warning on affluence" (in en). Nature Communications 11 (1): 3107. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMID 32561753. Bibcode2020NatCo..11.3107W. 
  164. Nielsen, Kristian S.; Nicholas, Kimberly A.; Creutzig, Felix; Dietz, Thomas; Stern, Paul C. (30 September 2021). "The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions" (in en). Nature Energy 6 (11): 1011–1016. doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00900-y. ISSN 2058-7546. Bibcode2021NatEn...6.1011N. 
  165. Gore, Tim (2020-09-23). "Confronting carbon inequality" (in en). https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/confronting-carbon-inequality. 
  166. Kartha, Sivan; Kemp-Benedict, Eric; Ghosh, Emily; Nazareth, Anisha; Gore, Tim (September 2020). "The Carbon Inequality Era: An assessment of the global distribution of consumption emissions among individuals from 1990 to 2015 and beyond". Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/research-report-carbon-inequality-era.pdf. 
  167. Clifford, Catherine (26 January 2021). "The '1%' are the main drivers of climate change, but it hits the poor the hardest: Oxfam report" (in en). CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/26/oxfam-report-the-global-wealthy-are-main-drivers-of-climate-change.html. 
  168. Berkhout, Esmé; Galasso, Nick; Lawson, Max; Rivero Morales, Pablo Andrés; Taneja, Anjela; Vázquez Pimentel, Diego Alejo (25 January 2021). "The Inequality Virus" (in en). https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/inequality-virus. 
  169. "Emissions Gap Report 2020 / Executive Summary". 2021. p. XV Fig. ES.8. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34438/EGR20ESE.pdf. 
  170. Paddison, Laura (28 October 2021). "How the rich are driving climate change" (in en). BBC. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20211025-climate-how-to-make-the-rich-pay-for-their-carbon-emissions. 
  171. Oswald, Yannick; Owen, Anne; Steinberger, Julia K. (March 2020). "Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories" (in en). Nature Energy 5 (3): 231–239. doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0579-8. ISSN 2058-7546. Bibcode2020NatEn...5..231O. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/156055/3/Submission%2520manuscript%25202.05%2520Y.O.%2520A.O.%2520J.K.S%5B1%5D.pdf. Retrieved 16 November 2021. 
  172. Timperley, Jocelyn. "Who is really to blame for climate change?" (in en). www.bbc.com. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200618-climate-change-who-is-to-blame-and-why-does-it-matter. 
  173. Zheng, Heran; Long, Yin; Wood, Richard; Moran, Daniel; Zhang, Zengkai; Meng, Jing; Feng, Kuishuang; Hertwich, Edgar et al. (March 2022). "Ageing society in developed countries challenges carbon mitigation" (in en). Nature Climate Change 12 (3): 241–248. doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01302-y. ISSN 1758-6798. Bibcode2022NatCC..12..241Z. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359121007. 
  174. Compilation and synthesis of fifth national communications. Executive summary. Note by the secretariat.. Geneva (Switzerland): United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2011. pp. 9–10. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/sbi/eng/inf01.pdf. 
  175. 175.0 175.1 EIA (October 2023). International Energy Outlook 2023. Washington DC, USA: US Energy Information Administration (EIA). https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/IEO2023_Narrative.pdf. Retrieved 2023-10-11.  Informally describes as a "narrative" and tagged IEO2023.
  176. EIA (11 October 2023). "International Energy Outlook 2023 — Landing page". US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Washington DC, USA. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/index.php.  Landing page.
  177. CSIS (11 October 2023). US EIA's International Energy Outlook 2023. Washington DC, USA: Center for Strategic and International Studies (SCIS). Retrieved 2023-10-13. YouTube. Duration: 00:57:12. Includes interview with Joseph DeCarolis.
  178. 178.0 178.1 "Fossil CO
    2
    emissions of all world countries - 2020 report"
    . EDGAR - Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2020.
       This article incorporates text available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
  179. "Climate Change Indicators: U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions / Figure 3. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions per Capita and per Dollar of GDP, 1990–2020". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 27 June 2016. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions. 
  180. 180.0 180.1 "COVID curbed carbon emissions in 2020 - but not by much". Nature 589 (7842): 343. January 2021. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00090-3. PMID 33452515. Bibcode2021Natur.589..343T. 
  181. "Erratum: Publisher Correction: Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19". Nature Climate Change 10 (10): 971. August 2020. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0904-z. PMID 32845944. 
  182. "Environmental effects of COVID-19 pandemic and potential strategies of sustainability". Heliyon 6 (9): e04965. September 2020. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04965. PMID 32964165. Bibcode2020Heliy...604965R. 
  183. "Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19" (in en). Nature Climate Change 10 (10): 913–919. 7 August 2020. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0. ISSN 1758-6798. Bibcode2020NatCC..10..913F. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/164227/7/Covid_emissions_paperV3_clean_supplementary.pdf. 

External links

Script error: No such module "World topic". Script error: No such module "World topic".