Physics:Global warming potential
Global warming potential (GWP) is an index to measure of how much infrared thermal radiation a greenhouse gas would absorb over a given time frame after it has been added to the atmosphere (or emitted to the atmosphere). The GWP makes different greenhouse gases comparable with regards to their "effectiveness in causing radiative forcing".[1](p2232) It is expressed as a multiple of the radiation that would be absorbed by the same mass of added carbon dioxide (CO
2), which is taken as a reference gas. Therefore, the GWP is one for CO
2. For other gases it depends on how strongly the gas absorbs infrared thermal radiation, how quickly the gas leaves the atmosphere, and the time frame being considered.
For example, methane has a GWP over 20 years (GWP-20) of 81.2[2] meaning that, for example, a leak of a tonne of methane is equivalent to emitting 81.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide measured over 20 years. As methane has a much shorter atmospheric lifetime than carbon dioxide, its GWP is much less over longer time periods, with a GWP-100 of 27.9 and a GWP-500 of 7.95.[2](p7SM-24)
The carbon dioxide equivalent (CO
2e or CO
2eq or CO
2-e) can be calculated from the GWP. For any gas, it is the mass of CO
2 that would warm the earth as much as the mass of that gas. Thus it provides a common scale for measuring the climate effects of different gases. It is calculated as GWP times mass of the other gas.
Definition
The global warming potential (GWP) is defined as an "index measuring the radiative forcing following an emission of a unit mass of a given substance, accumulated over a chosen time horizon, relative to that of the reference substance, carbon dioxide (CO2). The GWP thus represents the combined effect of the differing times these substances remain in the atmosphere and their effectiveness in causing radiative forcing."[1](p2232)
In turn, radiative forcing is a scientific concept used to quantify and compare the external drivers of change to Earth's energy balance.[3]:1–4 Radiative forcing is the change in energy flux in the atmosphere caused by natural or anthropogenic factors of climate change as measured in watts per meter squared.[4]
Values
.png)
The global warming potential (GWP) depends on both the efficiency of the molecule as a greenhouse gas and its atmospheric lifetime. GWP is measured relative to the same mass of CO
2 and evaluated for a specific timescale.[6] Thus, if a gas has a high (positive) radiative forcing but also a short lifetime, it will have a large GWP on a 20-year scale but a small one on a 100-year scale. Conversely, if a molecule has a longer atmospheric lifetime than CO
2 its GWP will increase when the timescale is considered. Carbon dioxide is defined to have a GWP of 1 over all time periods.
Methane has an atmospheric lifetime of 12 ± 2 years.[7]:Table 7.15 The 2021 IPCC report lists the GWP as 83 over a time scale of 20 years, 30 over 100 years and 10 over 500 years.[7]:Table 7.15 A 2014 analysis, however, states that although methane's initial impact is about 100 times greater than that of CO
2, because of the shorter atmospheric lifetime, after six or seven decades, the impact of the two gases is about equal, and from then on methane's relative role continues to decline.[8] The decrease in GWP at longer times is because methane decomposes to water and CO
2 through chemical reactions in the atmosphere.
Examples of the atmospheric lifetime and GWP relative to CO
2 for several greenhouse gases are given in the following table:
| Gas name | Chemical
formula |
Lifetime | Radiative Efficiency | Global warming potential (GWP) for given time horizon | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-yr.[7]:Table 7.15[9] | 100-yr.[7]:Table 7.15[9] | 500-yr.[7]:Table 7.15[10] | ||||
| Carbon dioxide | CO 2 |
(A) | 1.37×10−5 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Methane (fossil) | CH4 | 12 | 5.7×10−4 | 83 | 30 | 10 |
| Methane (non-fossil) | CH4 | 12 | 5.7×10−4 | 81 | 27 | 7.3 |
| Nitrous oxide | N2O | 109 | 3×10−3 | 273 | 273 | 130 |
| CFC-11 | CCl3F | 52 | 0.29 | 8 321 | 6 226 | 2 093 |
| CFC-12 | CCl2F2 | 100 | 0.32 | 10 800 | 10 200 | 5 200 |
| HCFC-22 | CHClF2 | 12 | 0.21 | 5 280 | 1 760 | 549 |
| HFC-32 | CH2F2 | 5 | 0.11 | 2 693 | 771 | 220 |
| HFC-134a | CH2FCF3 | 14 | 0.17 | 4 144 | 1 526 | 436 |
| Tetrafluoromethane | CF4 | 50 000 | 0.09 | 5 301 | 7 380 | 10 587 |
| Hexafluoroethane | C2F6 | 10 000 | 0.25 | 8 210 | 11 100 | 18 200 |
| Sulfur hexafluoride | SF6 | 3 200 | 0.57 | 17 500 | 23 500 | 32 600 |
| Nitrogen trifluoride | NF3 | 500 | 0.20 | 12 800 | 16 100 | 20 700 |
| (A) No single lifetime for atmospheric CO 2 can be given. | ||||||
Estimates of GWP values over 20, 100 and 500 years are periodically compiled and revised in reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The most recent report is the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (Working Group I) from 2023.[7]
The IPCC lists many other substances not shown here.[11][7] Some have high GWP but only a low concentration in the atmosphere.
The values given in the table assume the same mass of compound is analyzed; different ratios will result from the conversion of one substance to another. For instance, burning methane to carbon dioxide would reduce the global warming impact, but by a smaller factor than 25:1 because the mass of methane burned is less than the mass of carbon dioxide released (ratio 1:2.74).[12] For a starting amount of 1 tonne of methane, which has a GWP of 25, after combustion there would be 2.74 tonnes of CO
2, each tonne of which has a GWP of 1. This is a net reduction of 22.26 tonnes of GWP, reducing the global warming effect by a ratio of 25:2.74 (approximately 9 times).
| Greenhouse gas | Lifetime (years) |
Global warming potential, GWP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 years | 100 years | 500 years | ||
| Hydrogen (H2) | 4–7[13] | 33 (20-44)[13] | 11 (6–16)[13] | N/A |
| Methane (CH 4) |
11.8[7] | 56[14] 72[15] 84 / 86f[11] 96[16] 80.8 (biogenic)[7] 82.5 (fossil)[7] |
21[14] 25[15] 28 / 34f[11] 32[17] 39 (biogenic)[18] 40 (fossil)[18] |
6.5[14] 7.6[15] |
| Nitrous oxide (N 2O) |
109[7] | 280[14] 289[15] 264 / 268f[11] 273[7] |
310[14] 298[15] 265 / 298f[11] 273[7] |
170[14] 153[15] 130[7] |
| HFC-134a (hydrofluorocarbon) | 14.0[7] | 3,710 / 3,790f[11] 4,144[7] |
1,300 / 1,550f[11] 1,526[7] |
435[15] 436[7] |
| CFC-11 (chlorofluorocarbon) | 52.0[7] | 6,900 / 7,020f[11] 8,321[7] |
4,660 / 5,350f[11] 6,226[7] |
1,620[15] 2,093[7] |
| Carbon tetrafluoride (CF4 / PFC-14) | 50,000[7] | 4,880 / 4,950f[11] 5,301[7] |
6,630 / 7,350f[11] 7,380[7] |
11,200[15] 10,587[7] |
| HFC-23 (hydrofluorocarbon) | 222[11] | 12,000[15] 10,800[11] |
14,800[15] 12,400[11] |
12,200[15] |
| Sulfur hexafluoride SF 6 |
3,200[11] | 16,300[15] 17,500[11] |
22,800[15] 23,500[11] |
32,600[15] |
Earlier values from 2007
The values provided in the table below are from 2007 when they were published in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report.[19][15] These values are still used (as of 2020) for some comparisons.[20]
| Greenhouse gas | Chemical formula | 100-year Global warming potentials (2007 estimates, for 2013–2020 comparisons) |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon dioxide | CO2 | 1 |
| Methane | CH4 | 25 |
| Nitrous oxide | N2O | 298 |
| Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) | ||
| HFC-23 | CHF3 | 14,800 |
| Difluoromethane (HFC-32) | CH2F2 | 675 |
| Fluoromethane (HFC-41) | CH3F | 92 |
| HFC-43-10mee | CF3CHFCHFCF2CF3 | 1,640 |
| Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125) | C2HF5 | 3,500 |
| HFC-134 | C2H2F4 (CHF2CHF2) | 1,100 |
| 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) | C2H2F4 (CH2FCF3) | 1,430 |
| HFC-143 | C2H3F3 (CHF2CH2F) | 353 |
| 1,1,1-Trifluoroethane (HFC-143a) | C2H3F3 (CF3CH3) | 4,470 |
| HFC-152 | CH2FCH2F | 53 |
| HFC-152a | C2H4F2 (CH3CHF2) | 124 |
| HFC-161 | CH3CH2F | 12 |
| 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-Heptafluoropropane (HFC-227ea) | C3HF7 | 3,220 |
| HFC-236cb | CH2FCF2CF3 | 1,340 |
| HFC-236ea | CHF2CHFCF3 | 1,370 |
| HFC-236fa | C3H2F6 | 9,810 |
| HFC-245ca | C3H3F5 | 693 |
| HFC-245fa | CHF2CH2CF3 | 1,030 |
| HFC-365mfc | CH3CF2CH2CF3 | 794 |
| Perfluorocarbons | ||
| Carbon tetrafluoride – PFC-14 | CF4 | 7,390 |
| Hexafluoroethane – PFC-116 | C2F6 | 12,200 |
| Octafluoropropane – PFC-218 | C3F8 | 8,830 |
| Perfluorobutane – PFC-3-1-10 | C4F10 | 8,860 |
| Octafluorocyclobutane – PFC-318 | c-C4F8 | 10,300 |
| Perfluouropentane – PFC-4-1-12 | C5F12 | 9,160 |
| Perfluorohexane – PFC-5-1-14 | C6F14 | 9,300 |
| Perfluorodecalin – PFC-9-1-18b | C10F18 | 7,500 |
| Perfluorocyclopropane | c-C3F6 | 17,340 |
| Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) | ||
| Sulfur hexafluoride | SF6 | 22,800 |
| Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) | ||
| Nitrogen trifluoride | NF3 | 17,200 |
| Fluorinated ethers | ||
| HFE-125 | CHF2OCF3 | 14,900 |
| Bis(difluoromethyl) ether (HFE-134) | CHF2OCHF2 | 6,320 |
| HFE-143a | CH3OCF3 | 756 |
| HCFE-235da2 | CHF2OCHClCF3 | 350 |
| HFE-245cb2 | CH3OCF2CF3 | 708 |
| HFE-245fa2 | CHF2OCH2CF3 | 659 |
| HFE-254cb2 | CH3OCF2CHF2 | 359 |
| HFE-347mcc3 | CH3OCF2CF2CF3 | 575 |
| HFE-347pcf2 | CHF2CF2OCH2CF3 | 580 |
| HFE-356pcc3 | CH3OCF2CF2CHF2 | 110 |
| HFE-449sl (HFE-7100) | C4F9OCH3 | 297 |
| HFE-569sf2 (HFE-7200) | C4F9OC2H5 | 59 |
| HFE-43-10pccc124 (H-Galden 1040x) | CHF2OCF2OC2F4OCHF2 | 1,870 |
| HFE-236ca12 (HG-10) | CHF2OCF2OCHF2 | 2,800 |
| HFE-338pcc13 (HG-01) | CHF2OCF2CF2OCHF2 | 1,500 |
| (CF3)2CFOCH3 | 343 | |
| CF3CF2CH2OH | 42 | |
| (CF3)2CHOH | 195 | |
| HFE-227ea | CF3CHFOCF3 | 1,540 |
| HFE-236ea2 | CHF2OCHFCF3 | 989 |
| HFE-236fa | CF3CH2OCF3 | 487 |
| HFE-245fa1 | CHF2CH2OCF3 | 286 |
| HFE-263fb2 | CF3CH2OCH3 | 11 |
| HFE-329mcc2 | CHF2CF2OCF2CF3 | 919 |
| HFE-338mcf2 | CF3CH2OCF2CF3 | 552 |
| HFE-347mcf2 | CHF2CH2OCF2CF3 | 374 |
| HFE-356mec3 | CH3OCF2CHFCF3 | 101 |
| HFE-356pcf2 | CHF2CH2OCF2CHF2 | 265 |
| HFE-356pcf3 | CHF2OCH2CF2CHF2 | 502 |
| HFE-365mcfI’ll t3 | CF3CF2CH2OCH3 | 11 |
| HFE-374pc2 | CHF2CF2OCH2CH3 | 557 |
| – (CF2)4CH (OH) – | 73 | |
| (CF3)2CHOCHF2 | 380 | |
| (CF3)2CHOCH3 | 27 | |
| Perfluoropolyethers | ||
| PFPMIE | CF3OCF(CF3)CF2OCF2OCF3 | 10,300 |
| Trifluoromethyl sulfur pentafluoride | SF5CF3 | 17,400 |
Importance of time horizon
A substance's GWP depends on the number of years (denoted by a subscript) over which the potential is calculated. A gas which is quickly removed from the atmosphere may initially have a large effect, but for longer time periods, as it has been removed, it becomes less important. Thus methane has a potential of 25 over 100 years (GWP100 = 25) but 86 over 20 years (GWP20 = 86); conversely sulfur hexafluoride has a GWP of 22,800 over 100 years but 16,300 over 20 years (IPCC Third Assessment Report). The GWP value depends on how the gas concentration decays over time in the atmosphere. This is often not precisely known and hence the values should not be considered exact. For this reason when quoting a GWP it is important to give a reference to the calculation.
The GWP for a mixture of gases can be obtained from the mass-fraction-weighted average of the GWPs of the individual gases.[21]
Commonly, a time horizon of 100 years is used by regulators.[22][23]
Water vapour
Water vapour does contribute to anthropogenic global warming, but as the GWP is defined, it is negligible for H2O: an estimate gives a 100-year GWP between -0.001 and 0.0005.[24]
H2O can function as a greenhouse gas because it has a profound infrared absorption spectrum with more and broader absorption bands than CO
2. Its concentration in the atmosphere is limited by air temperature, so that radiative forcing by water vapour increases with global warming (positive feedback). But the GWP definition excludes indirect effects. GWP definition is also based on emissions, and anthropogenic emissions of water vapour (cooling towers, irrigation) are removed via precipitation within weeks, so its GWP is negligible.
Calculation methods
When calculating the GWP of a greenhouse gas, the value depends on the following factors:
- the absorption of infrared radiation by the given gas
- the time horizon of interest (integration period)
- the atmospheric lifetime of the gas
A high GWP correlates with a large infrared absorption and a long atmospheric lifetime. The dependence of GWP on the wavelength of absorption is more complicated. Even if a gas absorbs radiation efficiently at a certain wavelength, this may not affect its GWP much if the atmosphere already absorbs most radiation at that wavelength. A gas has the most effect if it absorbs in a "window" of wavelengths where the atmosphere is fairly transparent. The dependence of GWP as a function of wavelength has been found empirically and published as a graph.[28]
Because the GWP of a greenhouse gas depends directly on its infrared spectrum, the use of infrared spectroscopy to study greenhouse gases is centrally important in the effort to understand the impact of human activities on global climate change.
Just as radiative forcing provides a simplified means of comparing the various factors that are believed to influence the climate system to one another, global warming potentials (GWPs) are one type of simplified index based upon radiative properties that can be used to estimate the potential future impacts of emissions of different gases upon the climate system in a relative sense. GWP is based on a number of factors, including the radiative efficiency (infrared-absorbing ability) of each gas relative to that of carbon dioxide, as well as the decay rate of each gas (the amount removed from the atmosphere over a given number of years) relative to that of carbon dioxide.[29]
The radiative forcing capacity (RF) is the amount of energy per unit area, per unit time, absorbed by the greenhouse gas, that would otherwise be lost to space. It can be expressed by the formula:
[math]\displaystyle{ \mathit{RF} = \sum_{i=1}^{100} \text{abs}_i \cdot F_i / \left(\text{l} \cdot \text{d}\right) }[/math] where the subscript i represents a wavenumber interval of 10 inverse centimeters. Absi represents the integrated infrared absorbance of the sample in that interval, and Fi represents the RF for that interval.[citation needed]
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides the generally accepted values for GWP, which changed slightly between 1996 and 2001, except for methane, which had its GWP almost doubled. An exact definition of how GWP is calculated is to be found in the IPCC's 2001 Third Assessment Report.[30] The GWP is defined as the ratio of the time-integrated radiative forcing from the instantaneous release of 1 kg of a trace substance relative to that of 1 kg of a reference gas:
[math]\displaystyle{ \mathit{GWP} \left(x\right) = \frac{a_x}{a_r} \frac{\int_0^{\mathit{TH}} [x](t)\, dt} {\int_0^{\mathit{TH}} [r](t)\, dt} }[/math]
where TH is the time horizon over which the calculation is considered; ax is the radiative efficiency due to a unit increase in atmospheric abundance of the substance (i.e., Wm−2 kg−1) and [x](t) is the time-dependent decay in abundance of the substance following an instantaneous release of it at time t=0. The denominator contains the corresponding quantities for the reference gas (i.e. CO
2). The radiative efficiencies ax and ar are not necessarily constant over time. While the absorption of infrared radiation by many greenhouse gases varies linearly with their abundance, a few important ones display non-linear behaviour for current and likely future abundances (e.g., CO
2, CH4, and N2O). For those gases, the relative radiative forcing will depend upon abundance and hence upon the future scenario adopted.
Since all GWP calculations are a comparison to CO
2 which is non-linear, all GWP values are affected. Assuming otherwise as is done above will lead to lower GWPs for other gases than a more detailed approach would. Clarifying this, while increasing CO
2 has less and less effect on radiative absorption as ppm concentrations rise, more powerful greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide have different thermal absorption frequencies to CO
2 that are not filled up (saturated) as much as CO
2, so rising ppms of these gases are far more significant.
Applications
Carbon dioxide equivalent
Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO
2e or CO
2eq or CO
2-e) of a quantity of gas is calculated from its GWP. For any gas, it is the mass of CO
2 which would warm the earth as much as the mass of that gas.[31] Thus it provides a common scale for measuring the climate effects of different gases. It is calculated as GWP multiplied by mass of the other gas. For example, if a gas has GWP of 100, two tonnes of the gas have CO
2e of 200 tonnes, and 9 tonnes of the gas has CO
2e of 900 tonnes.
On a global scale, the warming effects of one or more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere can also be expressed as an equivalent atmospheric concentration of CO
2. CO
2e can then be the atmospheric concentration of CO
2 which would warm the earth as much as a particular concentration of some other gas or of all gases and aerosols in the atmosphere. For example, CO
2e of 500 parts per million would reflect a mix of atmospheric gases which warm the earth as much as 500 parts per million of CO
2 would warm it.[32][33] Calculation of the equivalent atmospheric concentration of CO
2 of an atmospheric greenhouse gas or aerosol is more complex and involves the atmospheric concentrations of those gases, their GWPs, and the ratios of their molar masses to the molar mass of CO
2.
CO
2e calculations depend on the time-scale chosen, typically 100 years or 20 years,[34][35] since gases decay in the atmosphere or are absorbed naturally, at different rates.
The following units are commonly used:
- By the UN climate change panel (IPCC): billion metric tonnes = n×109 tonnes of CO
2 equivalent (GtCO
2eq)[36] - In industry: million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (MMTCDE)[37] and MMT CO
2eq.[20] - For vehicles: grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per mile (gCO
2e/mile) or per kilometer (gCO
2e/km)[38][39]
For example, the table above shows GWP for methane over 20 years at 86 and nitrous oxide at 289, so emissions of 1 million tonnes of methane or nitrous oxide are equivalent to emissions of 86 or 289 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, respectively.
Use in Kyoto Protocol and for reporting to UNFCCC
Under the Kyoto Protocol, in 1997 the Conference of the Parties standardized international reporting, by deciding (see decision number 2/CP.3) that the values of GWP calculated for the IPCC Second Assessment Report were to be used for converting the various greenhouse gas emissions into comparable CO
2 equivalents.[40][41]
After some intermediate updates, in 2013 this standard was updated by the Warsaw meeting of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, decision number 24/CP.19) to require using a new set of 100-year GWP values. They published these values in Annex III, and they took them from the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, which had been published in 2007.[19] Those 2007 estimates are still used for international comparisons through 2020,[20] although the latest research on warming effects has found other values, as shown in the tables above.
Though recent reports reflect more scientific accuracy, countries and companies continue to use the IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR)[14] and IPCC Fourth Assessment Report values for reasons of comparison in their emission reports. The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report has skipped the 500-year values but introduced GWP estimations including the climate-carbon feedback (f) with a large amount of uncertainty.[11]
Other metrics to compare greenhouse gases
The Global Temperature change Potential (GTP) is another way to compare gases. While GWP estimates infrared thermal radiation absorbed, GTP estimates the resulting rise in average surface temperature of the world, over the next 20, 50 or 100 years, caused by a greenhouse gas, relative to the temperature rise which the same mass of CO
2 would cause.[11] Calculation of GTP requires modeling how the world, especially the oceans, will absorb heat.[22] GTP is published in the same IPCC tables with GWP.[11]
GWP* has been proposed to take better account of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP) such as methane, relating a change in the rate of emissions of SLCPs to a fixed quantity of CO
2.[42] However GWP* has itself been criticised both for its suitability as a metric and for inherent design features which can perpetuate injustices and inequity.[43][44][45]
See also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 IPCC, 2021: Annex VII: Glossary [Matthews, J.B.R., V. Möller, R. van Diemen, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C. Méndez, S. Semenov, A. Reisinger (eds.)]. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 2215–2256, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.022.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 7.SM.6 Tables of greenhouse gas lifetimes, radiative efficiencies and metrics, IPCC, 2021, p. 7SM-24, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter_07_Supplementary_Material.pdf.
- ↑ National Research Council (2005). Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing Uncertainties. The National Academic Press. doi:10.17226/11175. ISBN 978-0-309-09506-8.
- ↑ Drew, Shindell (2013). "Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis – Working Group 1 contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Radiative Forcing in the AR5". Rutgers University. http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/climdyn2013/IPCC/IPCC_WGI12-RadiativeForcing.pdf.
- ↑ "Global warming potential of greenhouse gases relative to CO2". https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-warming-potential-of-greenhouse-gases-over-100-year-timescale-gwp.
- ↑ IPCC, 2021: Annex VII: Glossary [Matthews, J.B.R., V. Möller, R. van Diemen, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C. Méndez, S. Semenov, A. Reisinger (eds.)]. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 2215–2256, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.022.
- ↑ 7.00 7.01 7.02 7.03 7.04 7.05 7.06 7.07 7.08 7.09 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14 7.15 7.16 7.17 7.18 7.19 7.20 7.21 7.22 7.23 7.24 7.25 7.26 7.27 Forster, P., T. Storelvmo, K. Armour, W. Collins, J.-L. Dufresne, D. Frame, D.J. Lunt, T. Mauritsen, M.D. Palmer, M. Watanabe, M. Wild, and H. Zhang, 2021: Chapter 7: The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity. In https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 923–1054, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.009.
- ↑ Chandler, David L.. "How to count methane emissions". MIT News. http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2014/how-count-methane-emissions-0425. Referenced paper is Trancik, Jessika; Edwards, Morgan (25 April 2014). "Climate impacts of energy technologies depend on emissions timing". Nature Climate Change 4 (5): 347. doi:10.1038/nclimate2204. Bibcode: 2014NatCC...4..347E. https://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs/Methane/Methane%20and%20time.pdf. Retrieved 15 January 2015.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 "Appendix 8.A". Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report. p. 731. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter08_FINAL.pdf. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
- ↑ "Table 2.14". IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. p. 212. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter2.pdf. Retrieved 16 December 2008.
- ↑ 11.00 11.01 11.02 11.03 11.04 11.05 11.06 11.07 11.08 11.09 11.10 11.11 11.12 11.13 11.14 11.15 11.16 11.17 11.18 11.19 IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch8 2013, pp. 714, 731.
- ↑ This is so, because of the reaction formula: CH4 + 2O2 → CO
2 + 2 H2O. As mentioned in the article, the oxygen and water is not considered for GWP purposes, and one molecule of methane (molar mass = 16.04 g mol−1) will yield one molecule of carbon dioxide (molar mass = 44.01 g mol−1). This gives a mass ratio of 2.74. (44.01/16.04 ≈ 2.74). - ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 Warwick, Nicola; Griffiths, Paul; Keeble, James; Archibald, Alexander; John, Pile (2022-04-08). Atmospheric implications of increased hydrogen use (Report). UK Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/atmospheric-implications-of-increased-hydrogen-use.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 IPCC SAR WG1 Ch2 1995, p. 121.
- ↑ 15.00 15.01 15.02 15.03 15.04 15.05 15.06 15.07 15.08 15.09 15.10 15.11 15.12 15.13 15.14 15.15 IPCC AR4 WG1 Ch2 2007, p. 212.
- ↑ Alvarez (2018). "Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain". Science 361 (6398): 186–188. doi:10.1126/science.aar7204. PMID 29930092. PMC 6223263. Bibcode: 2018Sci...361..186A. http://ws680.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=924889.
- ↑ Etminan, M.; Myhre, G.; Highwood, E. J.; Shine, K. P. (28 December 2016). "Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing". Geophysical Research Letters 43 (24). doi:10.1002/2016GL071930. Bibcode: 2016GeoRL..4312614E.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Morton, Adam (26 August 2020). "Methane released in gas production means Australia's emissions may be 10% higher than reported". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/aug/26/methane-released-in-gas-production-means-australias-emissions-may-be-10-higher-than-reported.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 "Report of the Conference of the Parties on its 19th Session". 2014-01-31. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2013/cop19/eng/10a03.pdf.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 "Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2018, p. ES-3". 2020-04-13. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-04/documents/us-ghg-inventory-2020-chapter-executive-summary.pdf.
- ↑ Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases Annex IV.
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 "Understanding Global Warming Potentials". United States Environmental Protection Agency. 12 January 2016. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials.
- ↑ Abernethy, Sam; Jackson, Robert B (February 2022). "Global temperature goals should determine the time horizons for greenhouse gas emission metrics". Environmental Research Letters 17 (2): 024019. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac4940. Bibcode: 2022ERL....17b4019A.
- ↑ Sherwood, Steven C.; Dixit, Vishal; Salomez, Chryséis (2018). "The global warming potential of near-surface emitted water vapour". Environmental Research Letters 13 (10): 104006. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae018. Bibcode: 2018ERL....13j4006S.
- ↑ "The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI)". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Spring 2023. https://gml.noaa.gov/aggi/aggi.html.
- ↑ "Annual Greenhouse Gas Index". U.S. Global Change Research Program. https://www.globalchange.gov/browse/indicators/annual-greenhouse-gas-index.
- ↑ Butler J. and Montzka S. (2020). "The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI)". NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory/Earth System Research Laboratories. https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi.html.
- ↑ Matthew Elrod, "Greenhouse Warming Potential Model." Based on Elrod, M. J. (1999). "Greenhouse Warming Potentials from the Infrared Spectroscopy of Atmospheric Gases". Journal of Chemical Education 76 (12): 1702. doi:10.1021/ed076p1702. Bibcode: 1999JChEd..76.1702E.
- ↑ "Glossary: Global warming potential (GWP)". U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/tools/glossary/index.cfm?id=G. "An index used to compare the relative radiative forcing of different gases without directly calculating the changes in atmospheric concentrations. GWPs are calculated as the ratio of the radiative forcing that would result from the emission of one kilogram of a greenhouse gas to that from the emission of one kilogram of carbon dioxide over a fixed period of time, such as 100 years."
- ↑ "Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis". http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/247.htm.
- ↑ "CO2e". https://www3.epa.gov/carbon-footprint-calculator/tool/definitions/co2e.html.
- ↑ "Atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations – Rationale" (in en). 2020-02-25. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/atmospheric-greenhouse-gas-concentrations-6/assessment-1.
- ↑ Gohar, L. K.; Shine, K. P. (November 2007). "Equivalent CO
2 and its use in understanding the climate effects of increased greenhouse gas concentrations". Weather 62 (11): 307–311. doi:10.1002/wea.103. Bibcode: 2007Wthr...62..307G. - ↑ Wedderburn-Bisshop, Gerard; Longmire, Andrew; Rickards, Lauren (2015). "Neglected Transformational Responses: Implications of Excluding Short Lived Emissions and Near Term Projections in Greenhouse Gas Accounting". The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses 7 (3): 11–27. doi:10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/v07i03/37242. ProQuest 2794017083.
- ↑ Ocko, Ilissa B.; Hamburg, Steven P.; Jacob, Daniel J.; Keith, David W.; Keohane, Nathaniel O.; Oppenheimer, Michael; Roy-Mayhew, Joseph D.; Schrag, Daniel P. et al. (5 May 2017). "Unmask temporal trade-offs in climate policy debates". Science 356 (6337): 492–493. doi:10.1126/science.aaj2350. PMID 28473552. Bibcode: 2017Sci...356..492O.
- ↑ Denison, Steve; Forster, Piers M; Smith, Christopher J (December 2019). "Guidance on emissions metrics for nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement". Environmental Research Letters 14 (12): 124002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab4df4. Bibcode: 2019ERL....14l4002D.
- ↑ "Glossary:Carbon dioxide equivalent – Statistics Explained". https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Carbon_dioxide_equivalent.
- ↑ "How Clean is Your Electric Vehicle?" (in en). https://evtool.ucsusa.org/.
- ↑ Whitehead, Jake (2019-09-07). "The Truth About Electric Vehicle Emissions". https://www.realclearscience.com/articles/2019/09/07/the_truth_about_electric_vehicle_emissions_111097.html.
- ↑ Conference of the Parties (25 March 1998). "Methodological issues related to the Kyoto Protocol". Report of the Conference of the Parties on its third session, held at Kyoto from 1 to 11 December 1997 Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its third session. UNFCCC. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop3/07a01.pdf. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
- ↑ Godal, Odd; Fuglestvedt, Jan (2002). "Testing 100-year global warming potentials: Impacts on compliance costs and abatement profile". Climatic Change 52 (1/2): 93–127. doi:10.1023/A:1013086803762. ProQuest 198550594.
- ↑ Lynch, John; Cain, Michelle; Pierrehumbert, Raymond; Allen, Myles (April 2020). "Demonstrating GWP*: a means of reporting warming-equivalent emissions that captures the contrasting impacts of short- and long-lived climate pollutants". Environmental Research Letters 15 (4): 044023. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7e. PMID 32395177. Bibcode: 2020ERL....15d4023L.
- ↑ Meinshausen, Malte; Nicholls, Zebedee (1 April 2022). "GWP*is a model, not a metric". Environmental Research Letters 17 (4): 041002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac5930. Bibcode: 2022ERL....17d1002M.
- ↑ Rogelj, Joeri; Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich (1 November 2019). "Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level". Environmental Research Letters 14 (11): 114039. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab4928. Bibcode: 2019ERL....14k4039R.
- ↑ Rogelj, Joeri; Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich (1 June 2021). "Reply to Comment on 'Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level'". Environmental Research Letters 16 (6): 068002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac02ec. Bibcode: 2021ERL....16f8002R.
Sources
- Schimel, D.; Alves, D.; Enting, I.; Heimann, M. et al. (1995). "Chapter 2: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change". Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC SAR WG1). pp. 65–132. https://ipcc.ch/report/ar2/wg1/.
- Forster, P.; Ramaswamy, V.; Artaxo, P.; Berntsen, T. et al. (2007). "Chapter 2: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and Radiative Forcing". Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp. 129–234. https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter2.pdf.
- Myhre, G.; Shindell, D.; Bréon, F.-M.; Collins, W. et al. (2013). "Chapter 8: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing". Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp. 659–740. https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter08_FINAL.pdf.
External links
- List of Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes from the U.S. EPA
- GWP and the different meanings of CO
2e explained
 |  |
