Astronomy:GW170817

From HandWiki
(Redirected from Astronomy:GRB 170817A)
Short description: Gravitational-wave signal detected in 2017
GW170817
InstrumentLIGO, Virgo
Right ascension 13h 09m 48.08s[1]
Declination−23° 22′ 53.3″[1]
EpochJ2000.0
Distance40 megaparsecs (130 Mly)
[edit on Wikidata]

Coordinates: Sky map 13h 09m 48.08 s, −23° 22′ 53.3 ″

GW 170817 was a gravitational wave (GW) signal observed by the LIGO and Virgo detectors on 17 August 2017, originating from the shell elliptical galaxy NGC 4993. The signal was produced by the last moments of a binary pair of neutron stars' inspiral process, ending with their merger. It is the first GW observation that has been confirmed by non-gravitational means.[1][2] Unlike the five previous GW detections—which were of merging black holes, and thus not expected to produce a detectable electromagnetic signal[3]—the aftermath of this merger was seen across the electromagnetic spectrum by 70 observatories on 7 continents and in space, marking a significant breakthrough for multi-messenger astronomy.[1][2][4][5][6][7][8][9] The discovery and subsequent observations of GW 170817 were given the Breakthrough of the Year award for 2017 by the journal Science.[6][10]

The gravitational wave signal, designated GW 170817, had a duration of approximately 100 seconds, and shows the characteristics in intensity and frequency expected of the inspiral of two neutron stars. Analysis of the slight variation in arrival time of the GW at the three detector locations (two LIGO and one Virgo) yielded an approximate angular direction to the source. Independently, a short (~2 seconds' duration) gamma-ray burst, designated GRB 170817A, was detected by the Fermi and INTEGRAL spacecraft beginning 1.7 seconds after the GW merger signal.[1][5][11] These detectors have very limited directional sensitivity, but indicated a large area of the sky which overlapped the gravitational wave position. It has been a long-standing hypothesis that short gamma-ray bursts are caused by neutron star mergers.

An intense observing campaign then took place to search for the expected emission at optical wavelengths. An astronomical transient designated AT 2017gfo (originally, SSS 17a) was found, 11 hours after the gravitational wave signal, in the galaxy NGC 4993[8] during a search of the region indicated by the GW detection. It was observed by numerous telescopes, from radio to X-ray wavelengths, over the following days and weeks, and was shown to be a fast-moving, rapidly-cooling cloud of neutron-rich material, as expected of debris ejected from a neutron-star merger.

In October 2018, astronomers reported that GRB 150101B, a gamma-ray burst event detected in 2015, may be analogous to GW 170817. The similarities between the two events, in terms of gamma ray, optical, and x-ray emissions, as well as to the nature of the associated host galaxies, are considered "striking", and this remarkable resemblance suggests the two separate and independent events may both be the result of the merger of neutron stars, and both may be a hitherto-unknown class of kilonova transients. Kilonova events, therefore, may be more diverse and common in the universe than previously understood, according to the researchers.[12][13][14][15] In retrospect, GRB 160821B, another gamma-ray burst event is now construed to be another kilonova,[16] by its resemblance of its data to AT2017gfo, part of the multi-messenger now denoted GW170817. In December 2022, astronomers suggested that kilonovae could also be found in long duration GRBs.[17][18]

Announcement

It's the first time that we've observed a cataclysmic astrophysical event in both gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves – our cosmic messengers.[19]

Reitze D, LIGO executive director

The observations were officially announced on 16 October 2017 at press conferences at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., and at the ESO headquarters in Garching bei München in Germany.[5][11][8]

Some information was leaked before the official announcement, beginning on 18 August 2017 when astronomer J. Craig Wheeler of the University of Texas at Austin tweeted "New LIGO. Source with optical counterpart. Blow your sox off!".[7] He later deleted the tweet and apologized for scooping the official announcement protocol. Other people followed up on the rumor, and reported that the public logs of several major telescopes listed priority interruptions in order to observe NGC 4993, a galaxy 40 Mpc (130 Mly) away in the Hydra constellation.[9][20] The collaboration had earlier declined to comment on the rumors, not adding to a previous announcement that there were several triggers under analysis.[21][22]

Gravitational wave detection

File:Neutron star collision.ogv The gravitational wave signal lasted for approximately 100 seconds starting from a frequency of 24 hertz. It covered approximately 3,000 cycles, increasing in amplitude and frequency to a few hundred hertz in the typical inspiral chirp pattern, ending with the collision received at 12:41:04.4 UTC.[2]:2 It arrived first at the Virgo detector in Italy, then 22 milliseconds later at the LIGO-Livingston detector in Louisiana, United States, and another 3 milliseconds later at the LIGO-Hanford detector in the state of Washington, in the United States. The signal was detected and analyzed by a comparison with a prediction from general relativity defined from the post-Newtonian expansion.[1]:3

An automatic computer search of the LIGO-Hanford datastream triggered an alert to the LIGO team about 6 minutes after the event. The gamma-ray alert had already been issued at this point (16 seconds post-event),[23] so the timing near-coincidence was automatically flagged. The LIGO/Virgo team issued a preliminary alert (with only the crude gamma-ray position) to astronomers in the follow-up teams at 40 minutes post-event.[24][25]

Sky localisation of the event requires combining data from the three interferometers; this was delayed by two problems. The Virgo data were delayed by a data transmission problem, and the LIGO Livingston data were contaminated by a brief burst of instrumental noise a few seconds prior to event peak, but persisting parallel to the rising transient signal in the lowest frequencies. These required manual analysis and interpolation before the sky location could be announced about 4.5 hours post-event.[26][25] The three detections localized the source to an area of 31 square degrees in the southern sky at 90% probability. More detailed calculations later refined the localization to within 28 square degrees.[24][2] In particular, the absence of a clear detection by the Virgo system implied that the source was in one of Virgo's blind spots; this absence of signal in Virgo data contributed to considerably reduce the source containment area.[27]

Gamma ray detection

Artistic concept: two neutron stars merge

The first electromagnetic signal detected was GRB 170817A, a short gamma-ray burst, detected 1.74±0.05 s after the merger time and lasting for about 2 seconds.[11][9][1]:5

GRB 170817A was discovered by the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, with an automatic alert issued just 14 seconds after the GRB detection. After the LIGO/Virgo circular 40 minutes later, manual processing of data from the INTEGRAL gamma-ray telescope also detected the same GRB. The difference in arrival time between Fermi and INTEGRAL helped to improve the sky localization.

This GRB was relatively faint given the proximity of the host galaxy NGC 4993, possibly due to its jets not being pointed directly toward Earth, but rather at an angle of about 30 degrees to the side.[8][28]

Electromagnetic follow-up

Hubble picture of NGC 4993 with inset showing GRB 170817A over 6 days. Credit: NASA and ESA
Optical lightcurves
The change in optical and near-infrared spectra

A series of alerts to other astronomers were issued, beginning with a report of the gamma-ray detection and single-detector LIGO trigger at 13:21 UTC, and a three-detector sky location at 17:54 UTC.[24] These prompted a massive search by many survey and robotic telescopes. In addition to the expected large size of the search area (about 150 times the area of a full moon), this search was challenging because the search area was near the Sun in the sky and thus visible for at most a few hours after dusk for any given telescope.[25]

In total six teams (One-Meter, Two Hemispheres (1M2H),[29] DLT40, VISTA, Master, DECam, and Las Cumbres Observatory (Chile)) imaged the same new source independently in a 90-minute interval.[1]:5 The first to detect optical light associated with the collision was the 1M2H team running the Swope Supernova Survey, which found it in an image of NGC 4993 taken 10 hours and 52 minutes after the GW event[11][1][30] by the 1-meter diameter (3.3 ft) Swope Telescope operating in the near infrared at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile. They were also the first to announce it, naming their detection SSS 17a in a circular issued 12h26m post-event.[29] The new source was later given an official International Astronomical Union (IAU) designation of AT 2017gfo.

The 1M2H team surveyed all galaxies in the region of space predicted by the gravitational wave observations, and identified a single new transient.[28][30] By identifying the host galaxy of the merger, it is possible to provide an accurate distance consistent with that based on gravitational waves alone.[1]:5

The detection of the optical and near-infrared source provided a huge improvement in localisation, reducing the uncertainty from several degrees to 0.0001 degree; this enabled many large ground and space telescopes to follow up the source over the following days and weeks. Within hours after localization, many additional observations were made across the infrared and visible spectrum.[30] Over the following days, the colour of the optical source changed from blue to red as the source expanded and cooled.[28]

Numerous optical and infrared spectra were observed; early spectra were nearly featureless, but after a few days, broad features emerged indicative of material ejected at roughly 10 percent of light speed. There are multiple strong lines of evidence that AT 2017gfo is indeed the aftermath of GW 170817. The colour evolution and spectra are dramatically different from any known supernova. The distance of NGC 4993 is consistent with that independently estimated from the GW signal. No other transient has been found in the GW sky localisation region. Finally, various archive images pre-event show nothing at the location of AT 2017gfo, ruling out a foreground variable star in the Milky Way.[29]

The source was detected in the ultraviolet (but not in X-rays) 15.3 hours after the event by the Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission.[4][6] After initial lack of X-ray and radio detections, the source was detected in X-rays 9 days later[31] using the Chandra X-ray Observatory,[32][33] and 16 days later in the radio[34] using the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) in New Mexico.[8] More than 70 observatories covering the electromagnetic spectrum observed the source.[8]

The radio and X-ray light continued to rise for several months after the merger,[35] and have been represented to be diminishing.[36] Astronomers reported obtaining optical images of GW170817 afterglow using the Hubble Space Telescope.[37][38] In March 2020, continued X-ray emission at 5-sigma was observed by the Chandra Observatory 940 days after the merger, demanding further augmentation or refutation of prior models that had previously been supplemented with additional post-hoc interventions.[39]

Other detectors

No neutrinos consistent with the source were found in follow-up searches by the IceCube and ANTARES neutrino observatories and the Pierre Auger Observatory.[2][1] A possible explanation for the non-detection of neutrinos is because the event was observed at a large off-axis angle and thus the outflow jet was not directed towards Earth.[40][41]

Astrophysical origin and products

The gravitational wave signal indicated that it was produced by the collision of two neutron stars[9][20][22][42] with a total mass of 2.82+0.47
−0.09 times the mass of the sun (solar masses M☉).[2] If low spins are assumed, consistent with those observed in binary neutron stars that will merge within a Hubble time, the total mass is 2.74+0.04
−0.01 M☉.

The masses of the component stars have greater uncertainty. The larger (m1) has a 90% chance of being between 1.36 and 2.26 M☉, and the smaller (m2) has a 90% chance of being between 0.86 and 1.36 M☉.[43] Under the low spin assumption, the ranges are 1.36 to 1.60 M☉ for m1 and 1.17 to 1.36 M☉ for m2, inside a 12 km radius.[44]

The chirp mass, a directly observable parameter which may be very roughly equated to the geometric mean of the masses, is measured at 1.188+0.004
−0.002 M☉.[43]

The total energy output of gravitational wave is ≃63 Foe. [45]

The origin and properties (masses and spins) of a double neutron star system like GW170817 are the result of a long sequence of complex binary star interactions.[46]

The neutron star merger event is thought to result in a spherically expanding kilonova,[47][48] characterized by a short gamma-ray burst followed by a longer optical "afterglow" powered by the radioactive decay of heavy r-process nuclei. Kilonovae are candidates for the production of half the chemical elements heavier than iron in the Universe.[8] A total of 16,000 times the mass of the Earth in heavy elements is believed to have formed, including approximately 10 Earth masses just of the two elements gold and platinum.[49]

A hypermassive neutron star was believed to have formed initially, as evidenced by the large amount of ejecta (much of which would have been swallowed by an immediately forming black hole). The lack of evidence for emissions being powered by neutron star spin-down, which would occur for longer-surviving neutron stars, suggest it collapsed into a black hole within milliseconds.[50]

One search claimed to find evidence of a gravitational wave signal from the remnant neutron star or black hole,[51] the energy of which was below the estimated sensitivity of the LIGO search algorithms at the time [52] and has recently been confirmed by a statistically independent method of analysis revealing the central engine of GRB170817A.[53]

Scientific importance

Artist's impression of strontium emerging from a neutron star merger.[54]

Scientific interest in the event was enormous, with dozens of preliminary papers (and almost 100 preprints[55]) published the day of the announcement, including 8 letters in Science,[8] 6 in Nature, and 32 in a special issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters devoted to the subject.[56] The interest and effort was global: The paper describing the multi-messenger observations[1] is coauthored by almost 4,000 astronomers (about one-third of the worldwide astronomical community) from more than 900 institutions, using more than 70 observatories on all 7 continents and in space.[7][8]

This may not be the first observed event that is due to a neutron star merger; GRB 130603B was the first plausible kilonova suggested based on follow-up observations of short-hard gamma-ray bursts.[57] It is, however, by far the best observation, making this the strongest evidence to date to confirm the hypothesis that some mergers of binary stars are the cause of short gamma-ray bursts.[1][2]

The event also provides a limit on the difference between the speed of light and that of gravity. Assuming the first photons were emitted between zero and ten seconds after peak gravitational wave emission, the difference between the speeds of gravitational and electromagnetic waves, vGW − vEM, is constrained to between −3×10−15 and +7×10−16 times the speed of light, which improves on the previous estimate by about 14 orders of magnitude.[43][58][lower-alpha 1] In addition, it allowed investigation of the equivalence principle (through Shapiro delay measurement) and Lorentz invariance.[2] The limits of possible violations of Lorentz invariance (values of 'gravity sector coefficients') are reduced by the new observations, by up to ten orders of magnitude.[43] GW 170817 also excluded some alternatives to general relativity,[59] including variants of scalar–tensor theory,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] Hořava–Lifshitz gravity,[63][68][64] Dark Matter Emulators,[69] and bimetric gravity,[70] Furthermore, an analysis published in July 2018 used GW170817 to show that gravitational waves propagate through 3+1 dimensional spacetime, in line with general relativity and contradicting hypotheses of "leakage" to higher dimensions of space.[71]

Gravitational wave signals such as GW 170817 may be used as a standard siren to provide an independent measurement of the Hubble constant.[72][73] An initial estimate of the constant derived from the observation is 70.0+12.0
−8.0 (km/s)/Mpc, broadly consistent with current best estimates.[72] Further studies improved the measurement to 70.3+5.3
−5.0 (km/s)/Mpc.[74][75][76] Together with the observation of future events of this kind the uncertainty is expected to reach two percent within five years and one percent within ten years.[77][78]

Electromagnetic observations help support the theory that neutron star mergers contribute to rapid neutron capture (r-process) nucleosynthesis[30]—previously assumed to be associated with supernova explosions—and are therefore the primary source of r-process elements heavier than iron,[1] including gold and platinum.[49] The first identification of r-process elements in a neutron star merger was obtained during a re-analysis of GW170817 spectra.[79] The spectra provided direct proof of strontium production during a neutron star merger. This also provided the most direct proof that neutron stars are made of neutron-rich matter. Since then, several r-process elements have been identified in the ejecta including yttrium,[80] lanthanum and cerium.[81]

In October 2017, Stephen Hawking, in his last broadcast interview, presented the overall scientific importance of GW170817.[82] In September 2018, astronomers reported related studies about possible mergers of neutron stars (NS) and white dwarfs (WD): including NS-NS, NS-WD, and WD-WD mergers.[83]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Previous constraint on the difference between the light speed and the gravitational speed was about ±20%.[58]

References

  1. ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 "Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger". The Astrophysical Journal 848 (2): L12. October 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9. Bibcode: 2017ApJ...848L..12A. https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0145/P1700294/007/ApJL-MMAP-171017.pdf. "The optical and near-infrared spectra over these few days provided convincing arguments that this transient was unlike any other discovered in extensive optical wide-field surveys over the past decade.". 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 "GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral". Physical Review Letters 119 (16): 161101. October 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101. PMID 29099225. Bibcode: 2017PhRvL.119p1101A. 
  3. ↑ "Focus on electromagnetic counterparts to binary black hole mergers". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 2016. http://iopscience.iop.org/journal/2041-8205/page/Focus_on_BBHM. "The follow-up observers sprang into action, not expecting to detect a signal if the gravitational radiation was indeed from a binary black-hole merger. [...] most observers and theorists agreed: the presence of at least one neutron star in the binary system was a prerequisite for the production of a circumbinary disk or neutron star ejecta, without which no electromagnetic counterpart was expected.". 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 "NASA missions catch first light from a gravitational-wave event". NASA. 16 October 2017. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=6975. 
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 "LIGO detects fierce collision of neutron stars for the first time". The New York Times. 16 October 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/16/science/ligo-neutron-stars-collision.html. 
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 "Cosmic convergence". Science 358 (6370): 1520–1521. December 2017. doi:10.1126/science.358.6370.1520. PMID 29269456. Bibcode: 2017Sci...358.1520C. 
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 "Astronomers catch gravitational waves from colliding neutron stars". Sky & Telescope. 16 October 2017. http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/astronomers-catch-gravitational-waves-from-colliding-neutron-stars/. "because colliding black holes don't give off any light, you wouldn't expect any optical counterpart." 
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 "Merging neutron stars generate gravitational waves and a celestial light show". Science. 16 October 2017. doi:10.1126/science.aar2149. https://www.science.org/content/article/merging-neutron-stars-generate-gravitational-waves-and-celestial-light-show. 
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 "Rumours swell over new kind of gravitational-wave sighting". Nature News. August 2017. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22482. 
  10. ↑ "Breakthrough of the year 2017". 22 December 2017. https://vis.sciencemag.org/breakthrough2017/. 
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 "A bright light seen across the Universe, proving Einstein right – violent collisions source of our gold, silver". The Mercury News. 16 October 2017. http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/16/a-bright-light-seen-across-the-universe-proving-einstein-right/. 
  12. ↑ "All in the family: Kin of gravitational wave source discovered – New observations suggest that kilonovae – immense cosmic explosions that produce silver, gold and platinum – may be more common than thought.". University of Maryland. 16 October 2018. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-10/uom-ait101518.php. 
  13. ↑ "A luminous blue kilonova and an off-axis jet from a compact binary merger at z = 0.1341". Nature Communications 9 (1): 4089. October 2018. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06558-7. PMID 30327476. Bibcode: 2018NatCo...9.4089T. 
  14. ↑ "GRB 150101B: A distant cousin to GW 170817". NASA. 16 October 2018. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/images/grb-150101b-a-distant-cousin-to-gw170817.html. 
  15. ↑ "Powerful cosmic flash is likely another neutron-star merger". 17 October 2018. https://www.space.com/42158-another-neutron-star-crash-detected.html. 
  16. ↑ "The afterglow and kilonova of the short GRB 160821B". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 489 (2): 2104. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2255. Bibcode: 2019MNRAS.489.2104T. 
  17. ↑ "A nearby long gamma-ray burst from a merger of compact objects". Nature 612 (7939): 228–231. December 2022. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05327-3. PMID 36477127. Bibcode: 2022Natur.612..228T. 
  18. ↑ "Kilonova Discovery Challenges our Understanding of Gamma-Ray Bursts" (in en). 2022-12-07. https://www.gemini.edu/pr/kilonova-discovery-challenges-our-understanding-gamma-ray-bursts. 
  19. ↑ "LIGO and Virgo make first detection of gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars". 16 October 2017. https://news.mit.edu/2017/ligo-virgo-first-detection-gravitational-waves-colliding-neutron-stars-1016. 
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 "Exclusive: We may have detected a new kind of gravitational wave". New Scientist. 23 August 2017. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2144937-exclusive-we-may-have-detected-a-new-kind-of-gravitational-wave/. 
  21. ↑ "A very exciting LIGO-Virgo observing run is drawing to a close August 25". LIGO. 25 August 2017. http://www.ligo.org/news/index.php#O2end. 
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 "Strange stars caught wrinkling spacetime? Get the facts.". National Geographic. 25 August 2017. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/08/new-gravitational-waves-neutron-stars-ligo-space-science/. Retrieved 27 August 2017. 
  23. ↑ "GCN notices related to Fermi-GBM alert 524666471". NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. 17 August 2017. https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/other/524666471.fermi. 
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 "GCN circulars related to LIGO trigger G298048". NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. 17 August 2017. https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/other/G298048.gcn3. 
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 "Colliding stars spark rush to solve cosmic mysteries". Nature 550 (7676): 309–310. October 2017. doi:10.1038/550309a. PMID 29052641. Bibcode: 2017Natur.550..309C. 
  26. ↑ "GW170817—The pot of gold at the end of the rainbow". 16 October 2017. https://cplberry.com/2017/10/16/gw170817/. 
  27. ↑ "Two massive collisions and a Nobel Prize". Sky & Telescope 135 (1): 10. January 2018. 
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 28.2 "Gravitational waves detected from neutron star crashes: The discovery explained". Purch Group. 16 October 2017. https://www.space.com/38471-gravitational-waves-neutron-star-crashes-discovery-explained.html. 
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 29.2 Ryan Foley and Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz (October 2017) GW170817/SSS17a: One-Meter, Two Hemispheres (1M2H)
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 "Light curves of the neutron star merger GW170817/SSS17a: Implications for r-process nucleosynthesis". Science 358 (6370): 1570–1574. December 2017. doi:10.1126/science.aaq0049. PMID 29038375. Bibcode: 2017Sci...358.1570D. 
  31. ↑ Troja, E.; Piro, L.; van Eerten, H. (November 2017). "The X-ray counterpart to the gravitational-wave event GW170817" (in en). Nature 551 (7678): 71–74. doi:10.1038/nature24290. ISSN 1476-4687. Bibcode: 2017Natur.551...71T. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature24290. 
  32. ↑ "Chandra :: Photo Album :: GW170817 :: October 16, 2017". http://chandra.si.edu/photo/2017/2nstars/. 
  33. ↑ "Chandra Makes First Detection of X-rays from a Gravitational Wave Source: Interview with Chandra Scientist Eleonora Nora Troja". http://chandra.si.edu/blog/node/656. 
  34. ↑ Hallinan, G.; Corsi, A. (2017). "A radio counterpart to a neutron star merger". Science 358 (6370): 1579–1583. doi:10.1126/science.aap9855. PMID 29038372. Bibcode: 2017Sci...358.1579H. https://authors.library.caltech.edu/81949/. 
  35. ↑ "Neutron-star merger creates new mysteries". https://eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2017-12/uos-nmc121817.php. 
  36. ↑ "Signals from a spectacular neutron star merger that made gravitational waves are slowly fading away". 30 April 2018. http://theconversation.com/signals-from-a-spectacular-neutron-star-merger-that-made-gravitational-waves-are-slowly-fading-away-94294. 
  37. ↑ "Hubble Captures Deepest Optical Image of First Neutron Star Collision". ScienceDaily.com. 11 September 2019. https://scitechdaily.com/hubble-captures-deepest-optical-image-of-first-neutron-star-collision/. 
  38. ↑ Lamb, G. P.; Lyman, J. D.; Levan, A. J.; Tanvir, N. R.; Kangas, T.; Fruchter, A. S.; Gompertz, B.; Hjorth, J. et al. (2019-01-09). "The Optical Afterglow of GW170817 at One Year Post-merger" (in en). The Astrophysical Journal 870 (2): L15. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf96b. ISSN 2041-8213. Bibcode: 2019ApJ...870L..15L. 
  39. ↑ "ATel#13565 - GW170817: Continued X-ray emission detected with Chandra at 940 days post-merger". The Astronomer's Telegram. 18 March 2020. http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=13565. 
  40. ↑ "Search for high-energy neutrinos from binary neutron star merger GW 170817 with ANTARES, IceCube, and the Pierre Auger Observatory". The Astrophysical Journal 850 (2): L35. October 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9aed. Bibcode: 2017ApJ...850L..35A. 
  41. ↑ "No neutrino emission from a binary neutron star merger". 16 October 2016. http://icecube.wisc.edu/news/view/539. 
  42. ↑ "What happens when two neutron stars collide? Scientific revolution". Wired. 25 August 2017. https://www.wired.com/story/what-happens-when-two-neutron-stars-collide-scientific-revolution/. Retrieved 27 August 2017. 
  43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 43.2 43.3 "Gravitational waves and gamma-rays from a binary neutron star merger: GW 170817 and GRB 170817A". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 848 (2): L13. 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c. Bibcode: 2017ApJ...848L..13A. 
  44. ↑ Abbott, B. P. et al. (15 October 2018). "GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State". Physical Review Letters 121 (16): 161101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101. PMID 30387654. Bibcode: 2018PhRvL.121p1101A. "constrain R1=11.9+1.4−1.4  km and R2=11.9+1.4−1.4  km at the 90% credible level". 
  45. ↑ "The Central Engine of GRB170817A and the Energy Budget Issue: Kerr Black Hole versus Neutron Star in a Multi-Messenger Analysis". https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371466362. 
  46. ↑ "Formation of Double Neutron Star Systems". The Astrophysical Journal 846 (2): 170. 13 September 2017. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e89. Bibcode: 2017ApJ...846..170T. 
  47. ↑ Sneppen, Albert; Watson, Darach; Bauswein, Andreas; Just, Oliver; Kotak, Rubina; Nakar, Ehud; Poznanski, Dovi; Sim, Stuart (February 2023). "Spherical symmetry in the kilonova AT2017gfo/GW170817" (in en). Nature 614 (7948): 436–439. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05616-x. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 36792736. Bibcode: 2023Natur.614..436S. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05616-x. 
  48. ↑ "What happens when two neutron stars collide? A 'perfect' explosion." (in en-US). Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2023/02/16/kilonova-perfect-explosion-black-hole/. 
  49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 Berger E (16 October 2017). LIGO/Virgo Press Conference. Event occurs at 1h48m. Retrieved 29 October 2017.
  50. ↑ "Constraining the Maximum Mass of Neutron Stars from Multi-messenger Observations of GW 170817". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 850 (2): L19. 21 November 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa991c. Bibcode: 2017ApJ...850L..19M. 
  51. ↑ "Observational evidence for extended emission to GW 170817". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 482 (1): L46–L49. January 2019. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly166. Bibcode: 2019MNRAS.482L..46V. "we report on a possible detection of extended emission (EE) in gravitational radiation during GRB170817A: a descending chirp with characteristic time-scale τs = 3.01±0.2 s in a (H1,L1)-spectrogram up to 700 Hz with Gaussian equivalent level of confidence greater than 3.3 σ based on causality alone following edge detection applied to (H1,L1)-spectrograms merged by frequency coincidences.". 
  52. ↑ The LIGO Scientific Collaboration; the Virgo Collaboration (2018). "Search for gravitational waves from a long-lived remnant of the binary neutron star merger GW170817". The Astrophysical Journal 875 (2): 160. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f3d. 
  53. ↑ van Putten, M.H.P.M.; Della Valle, M. (2023). "Central engine of GRB170817A: Neutron star versus Kerr black hole based on multimessenger calorimetry and event timing". Astronomy & Astrophysics 669: A36. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142974. Bibcode: 2023A&A...669A..36V. 
  54. ↑ "First identification of a heavy element born from neutron star collision - Newly created strontium, an element used in fireworks, detected in space for the first time following observations with ESO telescope" (in en). https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1917/. 
  55. ↑ "ArXiv.org search for GW 170817". https://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+GW170817/0/1/0/all/0/1. 
  56. ↑ "Focus on the electromagnetic counterpart of the neutron star binary merger GW 170817". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 848 (2). 16 October 2017. https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/2041-8205/page/Focus_on_GW170817. "It is rare for the birth of a new field of astrophysics to be pinpointed to a singular event. This focus issue follows such an event – the neutron star binary merger GW 170817 – marking the first joint detection and study of gravitational waves (GWs) and electromagnetic radiation (EM).". 
  57. ↑ DNews (7 August 2013). "Kilonova Alert! Hubble Solves Gamma Ray Burst Mystery". https://www.seeker.com/kilonova-alert-hubble-solves-gamma-ray-burst-mystery-1767686472.html. 
  58. ↑ 58.0 58.1 "Viewpoint: Reining in Alternative Gravity". Physics 10: 134. 18 December 2017. doi:10.1103/physics.10.134. 
  59. ↑ "How crashing neutron stars killed off some of our best ideas about what 'dark energy' is". The Conversation. 13 December 2017. https://phys.org/news/2017-12-neutron-stars-ideas-dark-energy.html. 
  60. ↑ "Breaking a Dark Degeneracy with Gravitational Waves". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2016 (3): 031. 28 September 2015. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/03/031. Bibcode: 2016JCAP...03..031L. 
  61. ↑ "Challenges to self-acceleration in modified gravity from gravitational waves and large-scale structure". Phys. Lett. B 765: 382–385. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.048. Bibcode: 2017PhLB..765..382L. 
  62. ↑ "Speed of gravitational waves and the fate of Scalar-Tensor Gravity". Physical Review D 95 (8): 084029. 14 April 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084029. ISSN 2470-0010. Bibcode: 2017PhRvD..95h4029B. 
  63. ↑ 63.0 63.1 "Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A". Physical Review Letters 119 (25): 251302. December 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251302. PMID 29303308. Bibcode: 2017PhRvL.119y1302C. 
  64. ↑ 64.0 64.1 "Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead". Physical Review Letters 119 (25): 251304. December 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251304. PMID 29303304. Bibcode: 2017PhRvL.119y1304E. 
  65. ↑ "Quest to settle riddle over Einstein's theory may soon be over". 10 February 2017. https://phys.org/news/2017-02-quest-riddle-einstein-theory.html. 
  66. ↑ "Theoretical battle: Dark energy vs. modified gravity". 25 February 2017. https://arstechnica.co.uk/science/2017/02/theoretical-battle-dark-energy-vs-modified-gravity/. 
  67. ↑ "Gravitational waves". Science News. https://www.sciencenews.org/editors-picks/gravitational-waves. 
  68. ↑ "Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories". Physical Review Letters 119 (25): 251303. December 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251303. PMID 29303345. Bibcode: 2017PhRvL.119y1303S. 
  69. ↑ "GW 170817 falsifies dark matter emulators". Phys. Rev. D 97 (4): 041501. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.041501. Bibcode: 2018PhRvD..97d1501B. 
  70. ↑ "Strong Constraints on Cosmological Gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A". Physical Review Letters 119 (25): 251301. December 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251301. PMID 29303333. Bibcode: 2017PhRvL.119y1301B. 
  71. ↑ Pardo, Kris; Fishbach, Maya; Holz, Daniel E.; Spergel, David N. (2018). "Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (7): 048. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/048. Bibcode: 2018JCAP...07..048P. 
  72. ↑ 72.0 72.1 "A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant". Nature 551 (7678): 85–88. November 2017. doi:10.1038/nature24471. PMID 29094696. Bibcode: 2017Natur.551...85A. 
  73. ↑ "Gravitational waves show how fast the Universe is expanding". Astronomy. 18 October 2017. http://www.astronomy.com/news/2017/10/gravitational-waves-show-how-fast-the-universe-is-expanding. Retrieved 18 October 2017. 
  74. ↑ "A Hubble constant measurement from superluminal motion of the jet in GW 170817". Nature Astronomy 3 (10): 940–944. 8 July 2019. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0820-1. Bibcode: 2019NatAs...3..940H. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-019-0820-1. Retrieved 8 July 2019. 
  75. ↑ "New method may resolve difficulty in measuring universe's expansion – Neutron star mergers can provide new 'cosmic ruler'". National Radio Astronomy Observatory. 8 July 2019. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-07/nrao-nmm070819.php. 
  76. ↑ "New method may resolve difficulty in measuring Universe's expansion". National Radio Astronomy Observatory. 8 July 2019. https://public.nrao.edu/news/new-method-measuring-universe-expansion/. 
  77. ↑ "Gravitational waves could soon provide measure of universe's expansion". 22 October 2018. https://phys.org/news/2018-10-gravitational-universe-expansion.html. 
  78. ↑ "A two per cent Hubble constant measurement from standard sirens within five years". Nature 562 (7728): 545–547. October 2018. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0606-0. PMID 30333628. Bibcode: 2018Natur.562..545C. 
  79. ↑ "Identification of strontium in the merger of two neutron stars". Nature 574 (7779): 497–500. October 2019. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1676-3. PMID 31645733. Bibcode: 2019Natur.574..497W. 
  80. ↑ Sneppen, Albert; Watson, Darach (2023-07-01). "Discovery of a 760 nm P Cygni line in AT2017gfo: Identification of yttrium in the kilonova photosphere" (in en). Astronomy & Astrophysics 675: A194. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346421. ISSN 0004-6361. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2023/07/aa46421-23/aa46421-23.html. 
  81. ↑ Domoto, Nanae; Tanaka, Masaomi; Kato, Daiji; Kawaguchi, Kyohei; Hotokezaka, Kenta; Wanajo, Shinya (2022-10-26). "Lanthanide Features in Near-infrared Spectra of Kilonovae". The Astrophysical Journal 939 (1): 8. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c36. ISSN 0004-637X. 
  82. ↑ "Stephen Hawking's final interview: A beautiful Universe". BBC News. 26 March 2018. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43499024. 
  83. ↑ "GRB 170817A-GW 170817-AT 2017gfo and the observations of NS-NS, NS-WD, and WD-WD mergers". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (10): 006. 28 September 2018. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/006. Bibcode: 2018JCAP...10..006R. 

External links



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Astronomy:GW170817&oldid=3345502"