Astronomy:Sun

From HandWiki
Short description: Star in the Solar System
Sun
White glowing ball with black sunspots
A solar filter dimmed true-color image of the visible photosphere of the Sun
NamesSun, Sol,[1] Sól, Helios[2]
AdjectivesSolar[3]
SymbolCircle with dot in the middle
Observation data
Mean distance from Earth
astronomical unit|AU
149,600,000 km
93,000,000 mi
8 min 19 s, light speed[4]
−26.74 (V)[5]
4.83[5]
G2V[6]
MetallicityZ = 0.0122[7]
Angular size0.527–0.545°[8]
Orbital characteristics
Mean distance from Milky Way core
26,660 light-years
Galactic period225–250 million years
Velocity
Obliquity
Right ascension North pole
286.13° (19° 4′ 30″)[citation needed]
Declination of North pole
+63.87° (63° 52′ N)[citation needed]
  • 25.05 days (equator)
  • 34.4 days (poles)[5]
Equatorial rotation velocity
1.997 km/s[10]
Physical characteristics
Equatorial radius
696,000 km
432,000 mi[11][12]
109 × Earth radii[10]
Flattening0.000009[citation needed]
Surface area6.09×10^12 km2
2.35×10^12 sq mi
12,000 × Earth[10]
Volume
  • 1.412×1018 km3
  • 0.877×1017 cu mi
  • 1,300,000 × Earth
Mass
Average density1.408 g/cm3
0.0509 lb/cu in
0.255 × Earth[5][10]
Age4.6 billion years[13][14]
Equatorial surface gravity
274 m/s2
900 ft/s2[5]
28 × Earth[10]
0.070[5]
617.7 km/s
55 × Earth[10]
Temperature
Luminosity
Color (B-V)0.63[citation needed]
Mean radiance2.009×107 W·m−2·sr−1
Photospheric composition by mass

The Sun is the star at the center of the Solar System. It is a massive, hot ball of plasma, inflated and heated by energy produced by nuclear fusion reactions at its core. Part of this internal energy is emitted from its surface as light, ultraviolet, and infrared radiation, providing most of the energy for life on Earth.

The Sun moves around the Galactic Center of the Milky Way, at a distance of 26,660 light-years. From Earth, it is on average astronomical unit|AU (1.496×108 km) or about 8 light-minutes away. Its diameter is about 1,391,400 km (864,600 mi; 4.64 ls), 109 times that of Earth or 4 lunar distances. Its mass is about 330,000 times that of Earth, making up about 99.86% of the total mass of the Solar System.[16] Roughly three-quarters of the Sun's mass consists of hydrogen (~73%); the rest is mostly helium (~25%), with much smaller quantities of heavier elements, including oxygen, carbon, neon, and iron.[17]

The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V), informally called a yellow dwarf, though its light is actually white. It formed approximately 4.6 billion[lower-alpha 1][13][18] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process.

Every second, the Sun's core fuses about 600 million tons of hydrogen into helium, and in the process converts 4 million tons of matter into energy. This energy, which can take between 10,000 and 170,000 years to escape the core, is the source of the Sun's light and heat. Far in the future, when hydrogen fusion in the Sun's core diminishes to the point where the Sun is no longer in hydrostatic equilibrium, its core will undergo a marked increase in density and temperature which will push its outer layers to expand, eventually transforming the Sun into a red giant. This process will make the Sun large enough to render Earth uninhabitable approximately five billion years from the present. After this, the Sun will shed its outer layers and become a dense type of cooling star (a white dwarf), and no longer produce energy by fusion, but still glow and give off heat from its previous fusion for trillions of years. After that it is theorized to become a super dense black dwarf, giving off no more energy.

The enormous effect of the Sun on Earth has been recognized since prehistoric times; the Sun was thought of by some cultures as a deity. The synodic rotation of Earth and its orbit around the Sun are the basis of some solar calendars. The predominant calendar in use today is the Gregorian calendar, which is based upon the standard 16th-century interpretation of the Sun's observed movement as actual movement.[19]

Etymology

The English word sun developed from Old English sunne. Cognates appear in other Germanic languages, including West Frisian sinne, Dutch zon, Low German Sünn, Standard German Sonne, Bavarian Sunna, Old Norse sunna, and Gothic sunnō. All these words stem from Proto-Germanic *sunnōn.[20][21] This is ultimately related to the word for sun in other branches of the Indo-European language family, though in most cases a nominative stem with an l is found, rather than the genitive stem in n, as for example in Latin sōl, ancient Greek ἥλιος (hēlios), Welsh haul and Czech slunce, as well as (with *l > r) Sanskrit स्वर (svár) and Persian خور (xvar). Indeed, the l-stem survived in Proto-Germanic as well, as *sōwelan, which gave rise to Gothic sauil (alongside sunnō) and Old Norse prosaic sól (alongside poetic sunna), and through it the words for sun in the modern Scandinavian languages: Swedish and Danish sol, Icelandic sól, etc.[21]

The principal adjectives for the Sun in English are sunny for sunlight and, in technical contexts, solar (/ˈslər/),[3] from Latin sol[22] – the latter found in terms such as solar day, solar eclipse and Solar System. From the Greek helios comes the rare adjective heliac (/ˈhliæk/).[23] In English, the Greek and Latin words occur in poetry as personifications of the Sun, Helios (/ˈhliəs/) and Sol (/ˈsɒl/),[2][1] while in science fiction Sol may be used to distinguish the Sun from other stars. The term sol with a lower-case s is used by planetary astronomers for the duration of a solar day on another planet such as Mars.[24]

The English weekday name Sunday stems from Old English Sunnandæg "sun's day", a Germanic interpretation of the Latin phrase diēs sōlis, itself a translation of the ancient Greek ἡμέρα ἡλίου (hēmera hēliou) 'day of the sun'.[25] The astronomical symbol for the Sun is a circle with a center dot, ☉. It is used for such units as M (Solar mass), R (Solar radius) and L (Solar luminosity).

General characteristics

The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star that makes up about 99.86% of the mass of the Solar System. The Sun has an absolute magnitude of +4.83, estimated to be brighter than about 85% of the stars in the Milky Way, most of which are red dwarfs.[26][27] The Sun is a Population I, or heavy-element-rich,[lower-alpha 2] star.[28] Its formation may have been triggered by shockwaves from one or more nearby supernovae.[29] This is suggested by a high abundance of heavy elements in the Solar System, such as gold and uranium, relative to the abundances of these elements in so-called Population II, heavy-element-poor, stars. The heavy elements could most plausibly have been produced by endothermic nuclear reactions during a supernova, or by transmutation through neutron absorption within a massive second-generation star.[28]

The Sun is by far the brightest object in the Earth's sky, with an apparent magnitude of −26.74.[30][31] This is about 13 billion times brighter than the next brightest star, Sirius, which has an apparent magnitude of −1.46.

One astronomical unit (about 150 million kilometres; 93 million miles) is defined as the mean distance of the Sun's center to Earth's center, though the distance varies (by about +/- 2.5 million km or 1.55 million miles) as Earth moves from perihelion on about 3 January to aphelion on about 4 July.[32] The distances can vary between 147,098,074 km (perihelion) and 152,097,701 km (aphelion), and extreme values can range from 147,083,346 km to 152,112,126 km.[33] At its average distance, light travels from the Sun's horizon to Earth's horizon in about 8 minutes and 20 seconds,[34] while light from the closest points of the Sun and Earth takes about two seconds less. The energy of this sunlight supports almost all life[lower-alpha 3] on Earth by photosynthesis,[35] and drives Earth's climate and weather.

The Sun does not have a definite boundary, but its density decreases exponentially with increasing height above the photosphere.[36] For the purpose of measurement, the Sun's radius is considered to be the distance from its center to the edge of the photosphere, the apparent visible surface of the Sun.[37] By this measure, the Sun is a near-perfect sphere with an oblateness estimated at 9 millionths,[38][39][40] which means that its polar diameter differs from its equatorial diameter by only 10 kilometers (6.2 mi).[41] The tidal effect of the planets is weak and does not significantly affect the shape of the Sun.[42] The Sun rotates faster at its equator than at its poles. This differential rotation is caused by convective motion due to heat transport and the Coriolis force due to the Sun's rotation. In a frame of reference defined by the stars, the rotational period is approximately 25.6 days at the equator and 33.5 days at the poles. Viewed from Earth as it orbits the Sun, the apparent rotational period of the Sun at its equator is about 28 days.[43] Viewed from a vantage point above its north pole, the Sun rotates counterclockwise around its axis of spin.[lower-alpha 4][44]

Composition

The Sun consists primarily of the chemical elements hydrogen and helium. At this time in the Sun's life, they account for 74.9% and 23.8%, respectively, of the mass of the Sun in the photosphere.[45] All heavier elements, called metals in astronomy, account for less than 2% of the mass, with oxygen (roughly 1% of the Sun's mass), carbon (0.3%), neon (0.2%), and iron (0.2%) being the most abundant.[46]

In solar research it is more common to express the abundance of each element in dex, which is a scaled logarithmic unit. [math]\displaystyle{ \mathrm{A}(e) = 12+\log_{10}(\frac{ne}{n\mathrm{H}}) }[/math], with 'e' being the element in question and nH as 1012 hydrogen atoms. By definition hydrogen has an abundance of 12, the helium abundance varies between roughly 10.3 and 10.5 depending on the phase of the Solar cycle,[47] Carbon is 8.47, Neon is 8.29, Oxygen is 7.69[48] and iron is 7.62.

The Sun's original chemical composition was inherited from the interstellar medium out of which it formed. Originally it would have contained about 71.1% hydrogen, 27.4% helium, and 1.5% heavier elements.[45] The hydrogen and most of the helium in the Sun would have been produced by Big Bang nucleosynthesis in the first 20 minutes of the universe, and the heavier elements were produced by previous generations of stars before the Sun was formed, and spread into the interstellar medium during the final stages of stellar life and by events such as supernovae.[49]

Since the Sun formed, the main fusion process has involved fusing hydrogen into helium. Over the past 4.6 billion years, the amount of helium and its location within the Sun has gradually changed. Within the core, the proportion of helium has increased from about 24% to about 60% due to fusion, and some of the helium and heavy elements have settled from the photosphere towards the center of the Sun because of gravity. The proportions of heavier elements are unchanged. Heat is transferred outward from the Sun's core by radiation rather than by convection (see Radiative zone below), so the fusion products are not lifted outward by heat; they remain in the core[50] and gradually an inner core of helium has begun to form that cannot be fused because presently the Sun's core is not hot or dense enough to fuse helium. In the current photosphere, the helium fraction is reduced, and the metallicity is only 84% of what it was in the protostellar phase (before nuclear fusion in the core started). In the future, helium will continue to accumulate in the core, and in about 5 billion years this gradual build-up will eventually cause the Sun to exit the main sequence and become a red giant.[51]

The chemical composition of the photosphere is normally considered representative of the composition of the primordial Solar System.[52] The solar heavy-element abundances described above are typically measured both using spectroscopy of the Sun's photosphere and by measuring abundances in meteorites that have never been heated to melting temperatures. These meteorites are thought to retain the composition of the protostellar Sun and are thus not affected by the settling of heavy elements. The two methods generally agree well.[17]

Structure and fusion

Main page: Astronomy:Standard solar model
Illustration of the Sun's structure, in false color for contrast

Core

Main page: Astronomy:Solar core

The core of the Sun extends from the center to about 20–25% of the solar radius.[53] It has a density of up to 150 g/cm3[54][55] (about 150 times the density of water) and a temperature of close to 15.7 million Kelvin (K).[55] By contrast, the Sun's surface temperature is approximately 5800 K. Recent analysis of SOHO mission data favors a faster rotation rate in the core than in the radiative zone above.[53] Through most of the Sun's life, energy has been produced by nuclear fusion in the core region through the proton–proton chain; this process converts hydrogen into helium.[56] Currently, only 0.8% of the energy generated in the Sun comes from another sequence of fusion reactions called the CNO cycle, though this proportion is expected to increase as the Sun becomes older and more luminous.[57][58]

The core is the only region on the Sun that produces an appreciable amount of thermal energy through fusion; 99% of the power is generated within 24% of the Sun's radius, and by 30% of the radius, fusion has stopped nearly entirely. The remainder of the Sun is heated by this energy as it is transferred outwards through many successive layers, finally to the solar photosphere where it escapes into space through radiation (photons) or advection (massive particles).[59][60]

Illustration of a proton-proton reaction chain, from hydrogen forming deuterium, helium-3, and regular helium-4

The proton–proton chain occurs around 9.2×1037 times each second in the core, converting about 3.7×1038 protons into alpha particles (helium nuclei) every second (out of a total of ~8.9×1056 free protons in the Sun), or about 6.2×1011 kg/s. However, each proton (on average) takes around 9 billion years to fuse with one another using the PP chain.[59] Fusing four free protons (hydrogen nuclei) into a single alpha particle (helium nucleus) releases around 0.7% of the fused mass as energy,[61] so the Sun releases energy at the mass–energy conversion rate of 4.26 million metric tons per second (which requires 600 metric megatons of hydrogen[62]), for 384.6 yottawatts (3.846×1026 W),[5] or 9.192×1010 megatons of TNT per second. The large power output of the Sun is mainly due to the huge size and density of its core (compared to Earth and objects on Earth), with only a fairly small amount of power being generated per cubic metre. Theoretical models of the Sun's interior indicate a maximum power density, or energy production, of approximately 276.5 watts per cubic metre at the center of the core,[63] which, according to Karl Kruszelnicki, is about the same power density inside a compost pile.[64]

The fusion rate in the core is in a self-correcting equilibrium: a slightly higher rate of fusion would cause the core to heat up more and expand slightly against the weight of the outer layers, reducing the density and hence the fusion rate and correcting the perturbation; and a slightly lower rate would cause the core to cool and shrink slightly, increasing the density and increasing the fusion rate and again reverting it to its present rate.[65][66]

Radiative zone

Illustration of different stars' internal structure. The Sun in the middle has an inner radiating zone and an outer convective zone.

The radiative zone is the thickest layer of the Sun, at 0.45 solar radii. From the core out to about 0.7 solar radii, thermal radiation is the primary means of energy transfer.[67] The temperature drops from approximately 7 million to 2 million kelvins with increasing distance from the core.[55] This temperature gradient is less than the value of the adiabatic lapse rate and hence cannot drive convection, which explains why the transfer of energy through this zone is by radiation instead of thermal convection.[55] Ions of hydrogen and helium emit photons, which travel only a brief distance before being reabsorbed by other ions.[67] The density drops a hundredfold (from 20 000 kg/m3 to 200 kg/m3) between 0.25 solar radii and 0.7 radii, the top of the radiative zone.[67]

Tachocline

Main page: Astronomy:Tachocline

The radiative zone and the convective zone are separated by a transition layer, the tachocline. This is a region where the sharp regime change between the uniform rotation of the radiative zone and the differential rotation of the convection zone results in a large shear between the two—a condition where successive horizontal layers slide past one another.[68] Presently, it is hypothesized (see Solar dynamo) that a magnetic dynamo within this layer generates the Sun's magnetic field.[55]

Convective zone

Main page: Astronomy:Convection zone

The Sun's convection zone extends from 0.7 solar radii (500,000 km) to near the surface. In this layer, the solar plasma is not dense or hot enough to transfer the heat energy of the interior outward via radiation. Instead, the density of the plasma is low enough to allow convective currents to develop and move the Sun's energy outward towards its surface. Material heated at the tachocline picks up heat and expands, thereby reducing its density and allowing it to rise. As a result, an orderly motion of the mass develops into thermal cells that carry most of the heat outward to the Sun's photosphere above. Once the material diffusively and radiatively cools just beneath the photospheric surface, its density increases, and it sinks to the base of the convection zone, where it again picks up heat from the top of the radiative zone and the convective cycle continues. At the photosphere, the temperature has dropped to 5,700 K (350-fold) and the density to only 0.2 g/m3 (about 1/10,000 the density of air at sea level, and 1 millionth that of the inner layer of the convective zone).[55]

The thermal columns of the convection zone form an imprint on the surface of the Sun giving it a granular appearance called the solar granulation at the smallest scale and supergranulation at larger scales. Turbulent convection in this outer part of the solar interior sustains "small-scale" dynamo action over the near-surface volume of the Sun.[55] The Sun's thermal columns are Bénard cells and take the shape of roughly hexagonal prisms.[69]

Photosphere

Main page: Astronomy:Photosphere
A miasma of plasma
High-resolution image of the Sun's surface taken by the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST)

The visible surface of the Sun, the photosphere, is the layer below which the Sun becomes opaque to visible light.[70] Photons produced in this layer escape the Sun through the transparent solar atmosphere above it and become solar radiation, sunlight. The change in opacity is due to the decreasing amount of H ions, which absorb visible light easily.[70] Conversely, the visible light we see is produced as electrons react with hydrogen atoms to produce H ions.[71][72]

The photosphere is tens to hundreds of kilometers thick, and is slightly less opaque than air on Earth. Because the upper part of the photosphere is cooler than the lower part, an image of the Sun appears brighter in the center than on the edge or limb of the solar disk, in a phenomenon known as limb darkening.[70] The spectrum of sunlight has approximately the spectrum of a black-body radiating at 5,777 K (5,504 °C; 9,939 °F), interspersed with atomic absorption lines from the tenuous layers above the photosphere. The photosphere has a particle density of ~1023 m−3 (about 0.37% of the particle number per volume of Earth's atmosphere at sea level). The photosphere is not fully ionized—the extent of ionization is about 3%, leaving almost all of the hydrogen in atomic form.[73]

During early studies of the optical spectrum of the photosphere, some absorption lines were found that did not correspond to any chemical elements then known on Earth. In 1868, Norman Lockyer hypothesized that these absorption lines were caused by a new element that he dubbed helium, after the Greek Sun god Helios. Twenty-five years later, helium was isolated on Earth.[74]

Atmosphere

Main page: Astronomy:Stellar atmosphere

The Sun's atmosphere is composed of four parts: the photosphere (visible under normal conditions), the chromosphere, the transition region, the corona and the heliosphere. During a total solar eclipse, the photosphere is blocked, making the corona visible.[75]

The coolest layer of the Sun is a temperature minimum region extending to about 500 km above the photosphere, and has a temperature of about 4,100 K.[70] This part of the Sun is cool enough to allow for the existence of simple molecules such as carbon monoxide and water, which can be detected via their absorption spectra.[76] The chromosphere, transition region, and corona are much hotter than the surface of the Sun.[70] The reason is not well understood, but evidence suggests that Alfvén waves may have enough energy to heat the corona.[77]

The Sun's transition region taken by Hinode's Solar Optical Telescope

Above the temperature minimum layer is a layer about 2,000 km thick, dominated by a spectrum of emission and absorption lines.[70] It is called the chromosphere from the Greek root chroma, meaning color, because the chromosphere is visible as a colored flash at the beginning and end of total solar eclipses.[67] The temperature of the chromosphere increases gradually with altitude, ranging up to around 20,000 K near the top.[70] In the upper part of the chromosphere helium becomes partially ionized.[78]

Above the chromosphere, in a thin (about 200 km) transition region, the temperature rises rapidly from around 20,000 K in the upper chromosphere to coronal temperatures closer to 1,000,000 K.[79] The temperature increase is facilitated by the full ionization of helium in the transition region, which significantly reduces radiative cooling of the plasma.[78] The transition region does not occur at a well-defined altitude. Rather, it forms a kind of nimbus around chromospheric features such as spicules and filaments, and is in constant, chaotic motion.[67] The transition region is not easily visible from Earth's surface, but is readily observable from space by instruments sensitive to the extreme ultraviolet portion of the spectrum.[80]

During a total solar eclipse, the solar corona can be seen with the naked eye, during the brief period of totality.

The corona is the next layer of the Sun. The low corona, near the surface of the Sun, has a particle density around 1015 m−3 to 1016 m−3.[78][lower-alpha 5] The average temperature of the corona and solar wind is about 1,000,000–2,000,000 K; however, in the hottest regions it is 8,000,000–20,000,000 K.[79] Although no complete theory yet exists to account for the temperature of the corona, at least some of its heat is known to be from magnetic reconnection.[79][81] The corona is the extended atmosphere of the Sun, which has a volume much larger than the volume enclosed by the Sun's photosphere. A flow of plasma outward from the Sun into interplanetary space is the solar wind.[81]

The heliosphere, the tenuous outermost atmosphere of the Sun, is filled with solar wind plasma. This outermost layer of the Sun is defined to begin at the distance where the flow of the solar wind becomes superalfvénic—that is, where the flow becomes faster than the speed of Alfvén waves,[82] at approximately 20 solar radii (0.1 AU). Turbulence and dynamic forces in the heliosphere cannot affect the shape of the solar corona within, because the information can only travel at the speed of Alfvén waves. The solar wind travels outward continuously through the heliosphere,[83][84] forming the solar magnetic field into a spiral shape,[81] until it impacts the heliopause more than 50 AU from the Sun. In December 2004, the Voyager 1 probe passed through a shock front that is thought to be part of the heliopause.[85] In late 2012 Voyager 1 recorded a marked increase in cosmic ray collisions and a sharp drop in lower energy particles from the solar wind, which suggested that the probe had passed through the heliopause and entered the interstellar medium,[86] and indeed did so August 25, 2012 at approximately 122 astronomical units (18 Tm) from the Sun.[87] The heliosphere has a heliotail which stretches out behind it due to the Sun's movement.[88]

On April 28, 2021, during its eighth flyby of the Sun, NASA's Parker Solar Probe encountered the specific magnetic and particle conditions at 18.8 solar radii that indicated that it penetrated the Alfvén surface, the boundary separating the corona from the solar wind defined as where the coronal plasma's Alfvén speed and the large-scale solar wind speed are equal.[89][90] The probe measured the solar wind plasma environment with its FIELDS and SWEAP instruments.[91] This event was described by NASA as "touching the Sun".[89] During the flyby, Parker Solar Probe passed into and out of the corona several times. This proved the predictions that the Alfvén critical surface is not shaped like a smooth ball, but has spikes and valleys that wrinkle its surface.[89]

Sunlight and neutrinos

Main pages: Astronomy:Sunlight and Astronomy:Solar irradiance
The Sun seen through a light fog

The Sun emits light across the visible spectrum, so its color is white, with a CIE color-space index near (0.3, 0.3), when viewed from space or when the Sun is high in the sky. The Solar radiance per wavelength peaks in the green portion of the spectrum when viewed from space.[92][93] When the Sun is very low in the sky, atmospheric scattering renders the Sun yellow, red, orange, or magenta, and in rare occasions even green or blue. Despite its typical whiteness (white sunrays, white ambient light, white illumination of the Moon, etc.), some cultures mentally picture the Sun as yellow and some even red; the reasons for this are cultural and exact ones are the subject of debate.[94] The Sun is a G2V star, with G2 indicating its surface temperature of approximately 5,778 K (5,505 °C; 9,941 °F), and V that it, like most stars, is a main-sequence star.[59][95]

The solar constant is the amount of power that the Sun deposits per unit area that is directly exposed to sunlight. The solar constant is equal to approximately 1,368 W/m2 (watts per square meter) at a distance of one astronomical unit (AU) from the Sun (that is, at or near Earth's orbit).[96] Sunlight on the surface of Earth is attenuated by Earth's atmosphere, so that less power arrives at the surface (closer to 1,000 W/m2) in clear conditions when the Sun is near the zenith.[97] Sunlight at the top of Earth's atmosphere is composed (by total energy) of about 50% infrared light, 40% visible light, and 10% ultraviolet light.[98] The atmosphere in particular filters out over 70% of solar ultraviolet, especially at the shorter wavelengths.[99] Solar ultraviolet radiation ionizes Earth's dayside upper atmosphere, creating the electrically conducting ionosphere.[100]

Ultraviolet light from the Sun has antiseptic properties and can be used to sanitize tools and water. It also causes sunburn, and has other biological effects such as the production of vitamin D and sun tanning. It is also the main cause of skin cancer. Ultraviolet light is strongly attenuated by Earth's ozone layer, so that the amount of UV varies greatly with latitude and has been partially responsible for many biological adaptations, including variations in human skin color in different regions of the Earth.[101]

150 million kilometers from Sun to Earth
Once outside the Sun's surface, neutrinos and photons travel at the speed of light.

High-energy gamma ray photons initially released with fusion reactions in the core are almost immediately absorbed by the solar plasma of the radiative zone, usually after traveling only a few millimeters. Re-emission happens in a random direction and usually at slightly lower energy. With this sequence of emissions and absorptions, it takes a long time for radiation to reach the Sun's surface. Estimates of the photon travel time range between 10,000 and 170,000 years.[102] In contrast, it takes only 2.3 seconds for neutrinos, which account for about 2% of the total energy production of the Sun, to reach the surface. Because energy transport in the Sun is a process that involves photons in thermodynamic equilibrium with matter, the time scale of energy transport in the Sun is longer, on the order of 30,000,000 years. This is the time it would take the Sun to return to a stable state if the rate of energy generation in its core were suddenly changed.[103]

Neutrinos are also released by fusion reactions in the core, but, unlike photons, they rarely interact with matter, so almost all are able to escape the Sun immediately. For many years, measurements of the number of neutrinos produced in the Sun were lower than theories predicted by a factor of 3. This discrepancy was resolved in 2001 through the discovery of the effects of neutrino oscillation: the Sun emits the number of neutrinos predicted by the theory, but neutrino detectors were missing ​23 of them because the neutrinos had changed flavor by the time they were detected.[104]

Magnetic activity

The Sun has a stellar magnetic field that varies across its surface. Its polar field is 1–2 gauss (0.0001–0.0002 T), whereas the field is typically 3,000 gauss (0.3 T) in features on the Sun called sunspots and 10–100 gauss (0.001–0.01 T) in solar prominences.[5] The magnetic field varies in time and location. The quasi-periodic 11-year solar cycle is the most prominent variation in which the number and size of sunspots waxes and wanes.[105][106][107]

The solar magnetic field extends well beyond the Sun itself. The electrically conducting solar wind plasma carries the Sun's magnetic field into space, forming what is called the interplanetary magnetic field.[81] In an approximation known as ideal magnetohydrodynamics, plasma particles only move along magnetic field lines. As a result, the outward-flowing solar wind stretches the interplanetary magnetic field outward, forcing it into a roughly radial structure. For a simple dipolar solar magnetic field, with opposite hemispherical polarities on either side of the solar magnetic equator, a thin current sheet is formed in the solar wind.[81]

At great distances, the rotation of the Sun twists the dipolar magnetic field and corresponding current sheet into an Archimedean spiral structure called the Parker spiral.[81] The interplanetary magnetic field is much stronger than the dipole component of the solar magnetic field. The Sun's dipole magnetic field of 50–400 μT (at the photosphere) reduces with the inverse-cube of the distance, leading to a predicted magnetic field of 0.1 nT at the distance of Earth. However, according to spacecraft observations the interplanetary field at Earth's location is around 5 nT, about a hundred times greater.[108] The difference is due to magnetic fields generated by electrical currents in the plasma surrounding the Sun.

Sunspot

Main page: Astronomy:Sunspot
Sunspots time-lapse in Hydrogen-alpha captured with an amateur solar telescope

Sunspots are visible as dark patches on the Sun's photosphere and correspond to concentrations of magnetic field where the convective transport of heat is inhibited from the solar interior to the surface. As a result, sunspots are slightly cooler than the surrounding photosphere, so they appear dark. At a typical solar minimum, few sunspots are visible, and occasionally none can be seen at all. Those that do appear are at high solar latitudes. As the solar cycle progresses towards its maximum, sunspots tend to form closer to the solar equator, a phenomenon known as Spörer's law. The largest sunspots can be tens of thousands of kilometers across.[109]

An 11-year sunspot cycle is half of a 22-year Babcock–Leighton dynamo cycle, which corresponds to an oscillatory exchange of energy between toroidal and poloidal solar magnetic fields. At solar-cycle maximum, the external poloidal dipolar magnetic field is near its dynamo-cycle minimum strength, but an internal toroidal quadrupolar field, generated through differential rotation within the tachocline, is near its maximum strength. At this point in the dynamo cycle, buoyant upwelling within the convective zone forces emergence of the toroidal magnetic field through the photosphere, giving rise to pairs of sunspots, roughly aligned east–west and having footprints with opposite magnetic polarities. The magnetic polarity of sunspot pairs alternates every solar cycle, a phenomenon described by Hale's law.[110][111]


During the solar cycle's declining phase, energy shifts from the internal toroidal magnetic field to the external poloidal field, and sunspots diminish in number and size. At solar-cycle minimum, the toroidal field is, correspondingly, at minimum strength, sunspots are relatively rare, and the poloidal field is at its maximum strength. With the rise of the next 11-year sunspot cycle, differential rotation shifts magnetic energy back from the poloidal to the toroidal field, but with a polarity that is opposite to the previous cycle. The process carries on continuously, and in an idealized, simplified scenario, each 11-year sunspot cycle corresponds to a change, then, in the overall polarity of the Sun's large-scale magnetic field.[112][113]

Solar activity

Main pages: Error: Template must be given at least one page name and Astronomy:Solar cycle
Measurements from 2005 of solar cycle variation during the previous 30 years

The Sun's magnetic field leads to many effects that are collectively called solar activity. Solar flares and coronal-mass ejections tend to occur at sunspot groups. Slowly changing high-speed streams of solar wind are emitted from coronal holes at the photospheric surface. Both coronal-mass ejections and high-speed streams of solar wind carry plasma and the interplanetary magnetic field outward into the Solar System.[114] The effects of solar activity on Earth include auroras at moderate to high latitudes and the disruption of radio communications and electric power. Solar activity is thought to have played a large role in the formation and evolution of the Solar System.

Long-term secular change in sunspot number is thought, by some scientists, to be correlated with long-term change in solar irradiance,[115] which, in turn, might influence Earth's long-term climate.[116] The solar cycle influences space weather conditions, including those surrounding Earth. For example, in the 17th century, the solar cycle appeared to have stopped entirely for several decades; few sunspots were observed during a period known as the Maunder minimum. This coincided in time with the era of the Little Ice Age, when Europe experienced unusually cold temperatures.[117] Earlier extended minima have been discovered through analysis of tree rings and appear to have coincided with lower-than-average global temperatures.[118]

In December 2019, a new type of solar magnetic explosion was observed, known as forced magnetic reconnection. Previously, in a process called spontaneous magnetic reconnection, it was observed that the solar magnetic field lines diverge explosively and then converge again instantaneously. Forced Magnetic Reconnection was similar, but it was triggered by an explosion in the corona.[119]

Life phases

Main pages: Astronomy:Formation and evolution of the Solar System and Astronomy:Stellar evolution
Overview of the evolution of a star like the Sun

The Sun today is roughly halfway through the most stable part of its life. It has not changed dramatically in over four billion[lower-alpha 1] years and will remain fairly stable for about than five billion more. However, after hydrogen fusion in its core has stopped, the Sun will undergo dramatic changes, both internally and externally. It is more massive than 71 of 75 other stars within 5 pc,[120] or in the top ~5 percent.

Formation

The Sun formed about 4.6 billion years ago from the collapse of part of a giant molecular cloud that consisted mostly of hydrogen and helium and that probably gave birth to many other stars.[121] This age is estimated using computer models of stellar evolution and through nucleocosmochronology.[13] The result is consistent with the radiometric date of the oldest Solar System material, at 4.567 billion years ago.[122][123] Studies of ancient meteorites reveal traces of stable daughter nuclei of short-lived isotopes, such as iron-60, that form only in exploding, short-lived stars. This indicates that one or more supernovae must have occurred near the location where the Sun formed. A shock wave from a nearby supernova would have triggered the formation of the Sun by compressing the matter within the molecular cloud and causing certain regions to collapse under their own gravity.[124] As one fragment of the cloud collapsed it also began to rotate due to conservation of angular momentum and heat up with the increasing pressure.[125] Much of the mass became concentrated in the center, whereas the rest flattened out into a disk that would become the planets and other Solar System bodies.[126][127] Gravity and pressure within the core of the cloud generated a lot of heat as it accumulated more matter from the surrounding disk, eventually triggering nuclear fusion.[128]

The stars HD 162826 and HD 186302 share similarities with the Sun and are thus hypothesized to be its stellar siblings, formed in the same molecular cloud.[129][130]

Main sequence

Evolution of a Sun-like star. The track of a one solar mass star on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram is shown from the main sequence to the post-asymptotic-giant-branch stage.

The Sun is about halfway through its main-sequence stage, during which nuclear fusion reactions in its core fuse hydrogen into helium. Each second, more than four million tonnes of matter are converted into energy within the Sun's core, producing neutrinos and solar radiation. At this rate, the Sun has so far converted around 100 times the mass of Earth into energy, about 0.03% of the total mass of the Sun. The Sun will spend a total of approximately 10 to 11  billion years as a main-sequence star before the red giant phase of the Sun.[131] At the 8 billion year mark, the Sun will be at its hottest point according to the ESA's Gaia space observatory mission in 2022.[132]

The Sun is gradually becoming hotter in its core, hotter at the surface, larger in radius, and more luminous during its time on the main sequence: since the beginning of its main sequence life, it has expanded in radius by 15% and the surface has increased in temperature from 5,620 K (5,350 °C; 9,660 °F) to 5,777 K (5,504 °C; 9,939 °F), resulting in a 48% increase in luminosity from 0.677 solar luminosities to its present-day 1.0 solar luminosity. This occurs because the helium atoms in the core have a higher mean molecular weight than the hydrogen atoms that were fused, resulting in less thermal pressure. The core is therefore shrinking, allowing the outer layers of the Sun to move closer to the center, releasing gravitational potential energy. According to the virial theorem, half of this released gravitational energy goes into heating, which leads to a gradual increase in the rate at which fusion occurs and thus an increase in the luminosity. This process speeds up as the core gradually becomes denser.[133] At present, it is increasing in brightness by about 1% every 100 million years. It will take at least 1 billion years from now to deplete liquid water from the Earth from such increase.[134] After that, the Earth will cease to be able to support complex, multicellular life and the last remaining multicellular organisms on the planet will suffer a final, complete mass extinction.[135]

After core hydrogen exhaustion

The size of the current Sun (now in the main sequence) compared to its estimated size during its red-giant phase in the future

The Sun does not have enough mass to explode as a supernova. Instead, when it runs out of hydrogen in the core in approximately 5 billion years, core hydrogen fusion will stop, and there will be nothing to prevent the core from contracting. The release of gravitational potential energy will cause the luminosity of the Sun to increase, ending the main sequence phase and leading the Sun to expand over the next billion years: first into a subgiant, and then into a red giant.[133][136][137] The heating due to gravitational contraction will also lead to expansion of the Sun and hydrogen fusion in a shell just outside the core, where unfused hydrogen remains, contributing to the increased luminosity, which will eventually reach more than 1,000 times its present luminosity.[133] When the Sun enters its red-giant branch (RGB) phase, it will engulf Mercury and (likely) Venus, reaching about 0.75 AU (110 million km; 70 million mi).[137][138] The Sun will spend around a billion years in the RGB and lose around a third of its mass.[137]

After the red-giant branch, the Sun has approximately 120 million years of active life left, but much happens. First, the core (full of degenerate helium) ignites violently in the helium flash; it is estimated that 6% of the core—itself 40% of the Sun's mass—will be converted into carbon within a matter of minutes through the triple-alpha process.[139] The Sun then shrinks to around 10 times its current size and 50 times the luminosity, with a temperature a little lower than today. It will then have reached the red clump or horizontal branch, but a star of the Sun's metallicity does not evolve blueward along the horizontal branch. Instead, it just becomes moderately larger and more luminous over about 100 million years as it continues to react helium in the core.[137]

When the helium is exhausted, the Sun will repeat the expansion it followed when the hydrogen in the core was exhausted. This time, however, it all happens faster, and the Sun becomes larger and more luminous, engulfing Venus if it has not already. This is the asymptotic-giant-branch phase, and the Sun is alternately reacting hydrogen in a shell or helium in a deeper shell. After about 20 million years on the early asymptotic giant branch, the Sun becomes increasingly unstable, with rapid mass loss and thermal pulses that increase the size and luminosity for a few hundred years every 100,000 years or so. The thermal pulses become larger each time, with the later pulses pushing the luminosity to as much as 5,000 times the current level and the radius to over 1 AU (150 million km; 93 million mi).[140]

According to a 2008 model, Earth's orbit will have initially expanded to at most 1.5 AU (220 million km; 140 million mi) due to the Sun's loss of mass as a red giant. However, Earth's orbit will later start shrinking due to tidal forces (and, eventually, drag from the lower chromosphere) so that it is engulfed by the Sun during the tip of the red-giant branch phase, 3.8 and 1 million years after Mercury and Venus have respectively suffered the same fate. Models vary depending on the rate and timing of mass loss. Models that have higher mass loss on the red-giant branch produce smaller, less luminous stars at the tip of the asymptotic giant branch, perhaps only 2,000 times the luminosity and less than 200 times the radius.[137] For the Sun, four thermal pulses are predicted before it completely loses its outer envelope and starts to make a planetary nebula. By the end of that phase—lasting approximately 500,000 years—the Sun will only have about half of its current mass.

The post-asymptotic-giant-branch evolution is even faster. The luminosity stays approximately constant as the temperature increases, with the ejected half of the Sun's mass becoming ionized into a planetary nebula as the exposed core reaches 30,000 K (29,700 °C; 53,500 °F), as if it is in a sort of blue loop. The final naked core, a white dwarf, will have a temperature of over 100,000 K (100,000 °C; 180,000 °F), and contain an estimated 54.05% of the Sun's present-day mass.[137] The planetary nebula will disperse in about 10,000 years, but the white dwarf will survive for trillions of years before fading to a hypothetical super-dense black dwarf.[141][142] As such it would give off no more energy for an even longer time than it was a white dwarf.[143]

Location

Solar System

Main page: Astronomy:Solar System
see caption
The Solar System, with sizes of the Sun and planets to scale. The terrestrial planets are on the right, the gas and ice giants are on the left.

The Sun has eight known planets orbiting it. This includes four terrestrial planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars), two gas giants (Jupiter and Saturn), and two ice giants (Uranus and Neptune). The Solar System also has nine bodies generally considered as dwarf planets and some more candidates, an asteroid belt, numerous comets, and a large number of icy bodies which lie beyond the orbit of Neptune. Six of the planets and many smaller bodies also have their own natural satellites: in particular, the satellite systems of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus are in some ways like miniature versions of the Sun's system.[144]

The Sun is moved by the gravitational pull of the planets. The center of the Sun is always within 2.2 solar radii of the barycenter. This motion of the Sun is mainly due to the four large planets. Each planet in the series Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, Uranus has about twice as much effect (moment of inertia) as the next. For some periods of several decades (when Neptune and Uranus are in opposition) the motion is rather regular, forming a trefoil pattern, whereas between these periods it appears more chaotic.Template:Bettersourceneeded[145] After 179 years (nine times the synodic period of Jupiter and Saturn), the pattern more or less repeats, but rotates by about 24°.[146] The orbits of the inner planets, including those of the Earth, are similarly displaced by the same gravitational forces, so the movement of the Sun has little effect on the relative positions of the Earth and the Sun or on solar irradiance on the Earth as a function of time.[147]

Celestial neighborhood

Motion

The general motion and orientation of the Sun, and Earth and the Moon as its Solar System satellites.

Being part of the Milky Way galaxy the Sun, taking along the whole Solar System, moves in an orbital fashion around the galaxy's center of mass at an average speed of 230 km/s (828,000 km/h) or 143 mi/s (514,000 mph),[148] taking about 220-250 million Earth years to complete a revolution (a Galactic year),[149] having done so about 20 times since the Sun's formation.[150] The direction of the Sun's motion, the Solar apex is roughly in the direction of the star Vega.

The Sun's idealized orbit around the Galactic Center in an artist's top-down depiction of the current layout of the Milky Way.

Observational history

Early understanding

The Trundholm sun chariot pulled by a horse is a sculpture believed to be illustrating an important part of Nordic Bronze Age mythology.

The Sun has been an object of veneration in many cultures throughout human history. Humanity's most fundamental understanding of the Sun is as the luminous disk in the sky, whose presence above the horizon causes day and whose absence causes night. In many prehistoric and ancient cultures, the Sun was thought to be a solar deity or other supernatural entity. The Sun has played an important part in many world religions, as described in a later section.

In the early first millennium BC, Babylonian astronomers observed that the Sun's motion along the ecliptic is not uniform, though they did not know why; it is today known that this is due to the movement of Earth in an elliptic orbit around the Sun, with Earth moving faster when it is nearer to the Sun at perihelion and moving slower when it is farther away at aphelion.[151]

One of the first people to offer a scientific or philosophical explanation for the Sun was the Ancient Greece philosopher Anaxagoras. He reasoned that it was not the chariot of Helios, but instead a giant flaming ball of metal even larger than the land of the Peloponnesus and that the Moon reflected the light of the Sun.[152] For teaching this heresy, he was imprisoned by the authorities and sentenced to death, though he was later released through the intervention of Pericles. Eratosthenes estimated the distance between Earth and the Sun in the third century BC as "of stadia myriads 400 and 80000", the translation of which is ambiguous, implying either 4,080,000 stadia (755,000 km) or 804,000,000 stadia (148 to 153 million kilometers or 0.99 to 1.02 AU); the latter value is correct to within a few percent. In the first century AD, Ptolemy estimated the distance as 1,210 times the radius of Earth, approximately 7.71 million kilometers (0.0515 AU).[153]

The theory that the Sun is the center around which the planets orbit was first proposed by the ancient Greek Aristarchus of Samos in the third century BC, and later adopted by Seleucus of Seleucia (see Heliocentrism). This view was developed in a more detailed mathematical model of a heliocentric system in the 16th century by Nicolaus Copernicus.

Development of scientific understanding

Observations of sunspots were recorded during the Han Dynasty (206 BC–AD 220) by Chinese astronomers, who maintained records of these observations for centuries. Averroes also provided a description of sunspots in the 12th century.[154] The invention of the telescope in the early 17th century permitted detailed observations of sunspots by Thomas Harriot, Galileo Galilei and other astronomers. Galileo posited that sunspots were on the surface of the Sun rather than small objects passing between Earth and the Sun.[155]

Arabic astronomical contributions include Al-Battani's discovery that the direction of the Sun's apogee (the place in the Sun's orbit against the fixed stars where it seems to be moving slowest) is changing.[156] (In modern heliocentric terms, this is caused by a gradual motion of the aphelion of the Earth's orbit). Ibn Yunus observed more than 10,000 entries for the Sun's position for many years using a large astrolabe.[157]

Sol, the Sun, from a 1550 edition of Guido Bonatti's Liber astronomiae

From an observation of a transit of Venus in 1032, the Persian astronomer and polymath Ibn Sina concluded that Venus was closer to Earth than the Sun.[158] In 1672 Giovanni Cassini and Jean Richer determined the distance to Mars and were thereby able to calculate the distance to the Sun.

In 1666, Isaac Newton observed the Sun's light using a prism, and showed that it is made up of light of many colors.[159] In 1800, William Herschel discovered infrared radiation beyond the red part of the solar spectrum.[160] The 19th century saw advancement in spectroscopic studies of the Sun; Joseph von Fraunhofer recorded more than 600 absorption lines in the spectrum, the strongest of which are still often referred to as Fraunhofer lines. The 20th century brought about several specialized systems for observing the Sun, especially at different narrowband wavelengths, such as those using Calcium H (396.9 nm), K (393.37 nm) and Hydrogen-alpha (656.46 nm) filtering.

Sun as seen in Hydrogen-alpha light

In the early years of the modern scientific era, the source of the Sun's energy was a significant puzzle. Lord Kelvin suggested that the Sun is a gradually cooling liquid body that is radiating an internal store of heat.[161] Kelvin and Hermann von Helmholtz then proposed a gravitational contraction mechanism to explain the energy output, but the resulting age estimate was only 20 million years, well short of the time span of at least 300 million years suggested by some geological discoveries of that time.[161][162] In 1890 Joseph Lockyer, who discovered helium in the solar spectrum, proposed a meteoritic hypothesis for the formation and evolution of the Sun.[163]

Not until 1904 was a documented solution offered. Ernest Rutherford suggested that the Sun's output could be maintained by an internal source of heat, and suggested radioactive decay as the source.[164] However, it would be Albert Einstein who would provide the essential clue to the source of the Sun's energy output with his mass–energy equivalence relation E = mc2.[165] In 1920, Sir Arthur Eddington proposed that the pressures and temperatures at the core of the Sun could produce a nuclear fusion reaction that merged hydrogen (protons) into helium nuclei, resulting in a production of energy from the net change in mass.[166] The preponderance of hydrogen in the Sun was confirmed in 1925 by Cecilia Payne using the ionization theory developed by Meghnad Saha. The theoretical concept of fusion was developed in the 1930s by the astrophysicists Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar and Hans Bethe. Hans Bethe calculated the details of the two main energy-producing nuclear reactions that power the Sun.[167][168] In 1957, Margaret Burbidge, Geoffrey Burbidge, William Fowler and Fred Hoyle showed that most of the elements in the universe have been synthesized by nuclear reactions inside stars, some like the Sun.[169]

Solar space missions

Illustration of Pioneer 6, 7, 8, and 9

The first satellites designed for long term observation of the Sun from interplanetary space were NASA's Pioneers 6, 7, 8 and 9, which were launched between 1959 and 1968. These probes orbited the Sun at a distance similar to that of Earth, and made the first detailed measurements of the solar wind and the solar magnetic field. Pioneer 9 operated for a particularly long time, transmitting data until May 1983.[170][171]

In the 1970s, two Helios spacecraft and the Skylab Apollo Telescope Mount provided scientists with significant new data on solar wind and the solar corona. The Helios 1 and 2 probes were U.S.–German collaborations that studied the solar wind from an orbit carrying the spacecraft inside Mercury's orbit at perihelion.[172] The Skylab space station, launched by NASA in 1973, included a solar observatory module called the Apollo Telescope Mount that was operated by astronauts resident on the station.[80] Skylab made the first time-resolved observations of the solar transition region and of ultraviolet emissions from the solar corona.[80] Discoveries included the first observations of coronal mass ejections, then called "coronal transients", and of coronal holes, now known to be intimately associated with the solar wind.[172]

In the 1970s, much research focused on the abundances of iron-group elements in the Sun.[173][174] Although significant research was done, until 1978 it was difficult to determine the abundances of some iron-group elements (e.g. cobalt and manganese) via spectrography because of their hyperfine structures.[173] The first largely complete set of oscillator strengths of singly ionized iron-group elements were made available in the 1960s,[175] and these were subsequently improved.[176] In 1978, the abundances of singly ionized elements of the iron group were derived.[173] Various authors have considered the existence of a gradient in the isotopic compositions of solar and planetary noble gases,[177] e.g. correlations between isotopic compositions of neon and xenon in the Sun and on the planets.[178] Prior to 1983, it was thought that the whole Sun has the same composition as the solar atmosphere.[179] In 1983, it was claimed that it was fractionation in the Sun itself that caused the isotopic-composition relationship between the planetary and solar-wind-implanted noble gases.[179]

Drawing of a Solar Maximum Mission probe

In 1980, the Solar Maximum Mission probes were launched by NASA. This spacecraft was designed to observe gamma rays, X-rays and UV radiation from solar flares during a time of high solar activity and solar luminosity. Just a few months after launch, however, an electronics failure caused the probe to go into standby mode, and it spent the next three years in this inactive state. In 1984, Space Shuttle Challenger mission STS-41C retrieved the satellite and repaired its electronics before re-releasing it into orbit. The Solar Maximum Mission subsequently acquired thousands of images of the solar corona before re-entering Earth's atmosphere in June 1989.[180]

Launched in 1991, Japan's Yohkoh (Sunbeam) satellite observed solar flares at X-ray wavelengths. Mission data allowed scientists to identify several different types of flares and demonstrated that the corona away from regions of peak activity was much more dynamic and active than had previously been supposed. Yohkoh observed an entire solar cycle but went into standby mode when an annular eclipse in 2001 caused it to lose its lock on the Sun. It was destroyed by atmospheric re-entry in 2005.[181]

One of the most important solar missions to date has been the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, jointly built by the European Space Agency and NASA and launched on 2 December 1995.[80] Originally intended to serve a two-year mission, a mission extension through 2012 was approved in October 2009.[182] It has proven so useful that a follow-on mission, the Solar Dynamics Observatory, was launched in February 2010.[183] Situated at the Lagrangian point between Earth and the Sun (at which the gravitational pull from both is equal), SOHO has provided a constant view of the Sun at many wavelengths since its launch.[80] Besides its direct solar observation, SOHO has enabled the discovery of a large number of comets, mostly tiny sungrazing comets that incinerate as they pass the Sun.[184]

Ulysses spacecraft testing at the vacuum spin-balancing facility
Artist rendition of the Parker Solar Probe

All these satellites have observed the Sun from the plane of the ecliptic, and so have only observed its equatorial regions in detail. The Ulysses probe was launched in 1990 to study the Sun's polar regions. It first traveled to Jupiter, to "slingshot" into an orbit that would take it far above the plane of the ecliptic. Once Ulysses was in its scheduled orbit, it began observing the solar wind and magnetic field strength at high solar latitudes, finding that the solar wind from high latitudes was moving at about 750 km/s, which was slower than expected, and that there were large magnetic waves emerging from high latitudes that scattered galactic cosmic rays.[185]

Elemental abundances in the photosphere are well known from spectroscopic studies, but the composition of the interior of the Sun is more poorly understood. A solar wind sample return mission, Genesis, was designed to allow astronomers to directly measure the composition of solar material.[186]

  • Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) mission was launched in October 2006. Two identical spacecraft were launched into orbits that caused them to (respectively) pull further ahead of and fall gradually behind Earth. This enables stereoscopic imaging of the Sun and solar phenomena, such as coronal mass ejections.[187][188]
  • Parker Solar Probe was launched in 2018 aboard a Delta IV Heavy rocket and will reach a perihelion of 0.046 AU in 2025, making it the closest-orbiting manmade satellite as the first spacecraft to fly low into the solar corona.[189]
  • Solar Orbiter mission (SolO) was launched in 2020 and will reach a minimum perihelion of 0.28 AU, making it the closest satellite with sun-facing cameras.[190]
  • CubeSat for Solar Particles (CuSP) was launched as a rideshare on Artemis 1 on 16 November 2022 to study particles and magnetic fields.
  • Indian Space Research Organisation has launched a 100 kg satellite named Aditya-L1 on 2 September 2023.[191] Its main instrument will be a coronagraph for studying the dynamics of the solar corona.[192]

Unsolved problems

Coronal heating

Main page: Astronomy:Stellar corona
Question, Web Fundamentals.svg Unsolved problem in astronomy:
Why is the Sun's corona so much hotter than the Sun's surface?
(more unsolved problems in astronomy)

The temperature of the photosphere is approximately 6,000 K, whereas the temperature of the corona reaches 1,000,000–2,000,000 K.[79] The high temperature of the corona shows that it is heated by something other than direct heat conduction from the photosphere.[81]

It is thought that the energy necessary to heat the corona is provided by turbulent motion in the convection zone below the photosphere, and two main mechanisms have been proposed to explain coronal heating.[79] The first is wave heating, in which sound, gravitational or magnetohydrodynamic waves are produced by turbulence in the convection zone.[79] These waves travel upward and dissipate in the corona, depositing their energy in the ambient matter in the form of heat.[193] The other is magnetic heating, in which magnetic energy is continuously built up by photospheric motion and released through magnetic reconnection in the form of large solar flares and myriad similar but smaller events—nanoflares.[194]

Currently, it is unclear whether waves are an efficient heating mechanism. All waves except Alfvén waves have been found to dissipate or refract before reaching the corona.[195] In addition, Alfvén waves do not easily dissipate in the corona. Current research focus has therefore shifted towards flare heating mechanisms.[79]

Faint young Sun

Main page: Faint young Sun paradox
Question, Web Fundamentals.svg Unsolved problem in astronomy:
How could the early Earth have had liquid water if the Sun's output is predicted to have only been 70% as intense as it is today?
(more unsolved problems in astronomy)

Theoretical models of the Sun's development suggest that 3.8 to 2.5 billion years ago, during the Archean eon, the Sun was only about 75% as bright as it is today. Such a weak star would not have been able to sustain liquid water on Earth's surface, and thus life should not have been able to develop. However, the geological record demonstrates that Earth has remained at a fairly constant temperature throughout its history and that the young Earth was somewhat warmer than it is today. One theory among scientists is that the atmosphere of the young Earth contained much larger quantities of greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane) than are present today, which trapped enough heat to compensate for the smaller amount of solar energy reaching it.[196]

However, examination of Archaean sediments appears inconsistent with the hypothesis of high greenhouse concentrations. Instead, the moderate temperature range may be explained by a lower surface albedo brought about by less continental area and the lack of biologically induced cloud condensation nuclei. This would have led to increased absorption of solar energy, thereby compensating for the lower solar output.[197]

Observation by eyes

The Sun seen from Earth, with glare from the lenses. The eye also sees glare when looked towards the Sun directly.

The brightness of the Sun can cause pain from looking at it with the naked eye; however, doing so for brief periods is not hazardous for normal non-dilated eyes.[198][199] Looking directly at the Sun (sungazing) causes phosphene visual artifacts and temporary partial blindness. It also delivers about 4 milliwatts of sunlight to the retina, slightly heating it and potentially causing damage in eyes that cannot respond properly to the brightness.[200][201] Viewing of the direct Sun with the naked eye can cause UV-induced, sunburn-like lesions on the retina beginning after about 100 seconds, particularly under conditions where the UV light from the Sun is intense and well focused.[202][203]

Viewing the Sun through light-concentrating optics such as binoculars may result in permanent damage to the retina without an appropriate filter that blocks UV and substantially dims the sunlight. When using an attenuating filter to view the Sun, the viewer is cautioned to use a filter specifically designed for that use. Some improvised filters that pass UV or IR rays, can actually harm the eye at high brightness levels.[204] Brief glances at the midday Sun through an unfiltered telescope can cause permanent damage.[205]

During sunrise and sunset, sunlight is attenuated because of Rayleigh scattering and Mie scattering from a particularly long passage through Earth's atmosphere,[206] and the Sun is sometimes faint enough to be viewed comfortably with the naked eye or safely with optics (provided there is no risk of bright sunlight suddenly appearing through a break between clouds). Hazy conditions, atmospheric dust, and high humidity contribute to this atmospheric attenuation.[207]

An optical phenomenon, known as a green flash, can sometimes be seen shortly after sunset or before sunrise. The flash is caused by light from the Sun just below the horizon being bent (usually through a temperature inversion) towards the observer. Light of shorter wavelengths (violet, blue, green) is bent more than that of longer wavelengths (yellow, orange, red) but the violet and blue light is scattered more, leaving light that is perceived as green.[208]

Religious aspects

Sun and Immortal Birds Gold Ornament by ancient Shu people. The center is a sun pattern with twelve points around which four birds fly in the same counterclockwise direction. Ancient Kingdom of Shu, coinciding with the Shang dynasty.

Solar deities play a major role in many world religions and mythologies.[209] Worship of the Sun was central to civilizations such as the ancient Egyptians, the Inca of South America and the Aztecs of what is now Mexico. In religions such as Hinduism, the Sun is still considered a god, known as Surya. Many ancient monuments were constructed with solar phenomena in mind; for example, stone megaliths accurately mark the summer or winter solstice (for example in Nabta Playa, Egypt; Mnajdra, Malta; and Stonehenge, England); Newgrange, a prehistoric human-built mount in Ireland, was designed to detect the winter solstice; the pyramid of El Castillo at Chichén Itzá in Mexico is designed to cast shadows in the shape of serpents climbing the pyramid at the vernal and autumnal equinoxes.

The ancient Sumerians believed that the Sun was Utu,[210][211] the god of justice and twin brother of Inanna, the Queen of Heaven,[210] who was identified as the planet Venus.[211] Later, Utu was identified with the East Semitic god Shamash.[210][211] Utu was regarded as a helper-deity, who aided those in distress.[210]

Ra from the tomb of Nefertari, 13th century BC

From at least the Fourth Dynasty of Ancient Egypt, the Sun was worshipped as the god Ra, portrayed as a falcon-headed divinity surmounted by the solar disk, and surrounded by a serpent. In the New Empire period, the Sun became identified with the dung beetle. In the form of the sun disc Aten, the Sun had a brief resurgence during the Amarna Period when it again became the preeminent, if not only, divinity for the Pharaoh Akhenaton.[212][213]

Ra on the solar barque, adorned with the sun-disk

The Egyptians portrayed the god Ra as being carried across the sky in a solar barque, accompanied by lesser gods, and to the Greeks, he was Helios, carried by a chariot drawn by fiery horses. From the reign of Elagabalus in the late Roman Empire the Sun's birthday was a holiday celebrated as Sol Invictus (literally "Unconquered Sun") soon after the winter solstice, which may have been an antecedent to Christmas. Regarding the fixed stars, the Sun appears from Earth to revolve once a year along the ecliptic through the zodiac, and so Greek astronomers categorized it as one of the seven planets (Greek planetes, "wanderer"); the naming of the days of the weeks after the seven planets dates to the Roman era.[214][215][216]

In Proto-Indo-European religion, the Sun was personified as the goddess *Seh2ul.[217][218] Derivatives of this goddess in Indo-European languages include the Old Norse Sól, Sanskrit Surya, Gaulish Sulis, Lithuanian Saulė, and Slavic Solntse.[218] In ancient Greek religion, the sun deity was the male god Helios,[219] who in later times was syncretized with Apollo.[220]

In the Bible, Malachi 4:2 mentions the "Sun of Righteousness" (sometimes translated as the "Sun of Justice"),[221][222] which some Christians have interpreted as a reference to the Messiah (Christ).[223] In ancient Roman culture, Sunday was the day of the sun god. In paganism, the Sun was a source of life, giving warmth and illumination. It was the center of a popular cult among Romans, who would stand at dawn to catch the first rays of sunshine as they prayed. The celebration of the winter solstice (which influenced Christmas) was part of the Roman cult of the unconquered Sun (Sol Invictus). It was adopted as the Sabbath day by Christians. The symbol of light was a pagan device adopted by Christians, and perhaps the most important one that did not come from Jewish traditions. Christian churches were built so that the congregation faced toward the sunrise.[224]

Tonatiuh, the Aztec god of the sun,[225] was closely associated with the practice of human sacrifice.[225] The sun goddess Amaterasu is the most important deity in the Shinto religion,[226][227] and she is believed to be the direct ancestor of all Japanese emperors.[226]

See also


Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 All numbers in this article are short scale. One billion is 109, or 1,000,000,000.
  2. In astronomical sciences, the term heavy elements (or metals) refers to all chemical elements except hydrogen and helium.
  3. Hydrothermal vent communities live so deep under the sea that they have no access to sunlight. Bacteria instead use sulfur compounds as an energy source, via chemosynthesis.
  4. Counterclockwise is also the direction of revolution around the Sun for objects in the Solar System and is the direction of axial spin for most objects.
  5. Earth's atmosphere near sea level has a particle density of about 2×1025 m−3.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Sol (3rd ed.), Oxford University Press, September 2005, http://oed.com/search?searchType=dictionary&q=Sol  (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  2. 2.0 2.1 "Helios". Lexico UK English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. http://www.lexico.com/definition/Helios. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 solar (3rd ed.), Oxford University Press, September 2005, http://oed.com/search?searchType=dictionary&q=solar  (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  4. Pitjeva, E. V.; Standish, E. M. (2009). "Proposals for the masses of the three largest asteroids, the Moon–Earth mass ratio and the Astronomical Unit" (in en). Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 103 (4): 365–372. doi:10.1007/s10569-009-9203-8. ISSN 1572-9478. Bibcode2009CeMDA.103..365P. https://zenodo.org/record/1000691. Retrieved 13 July 2019. 
  5. 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 Williams, D.R. (1 July 2013). "Sun Fact Sheet". NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/sunfact.html. 
  6. Zombeck, Martin V. (1990). Handbook of Space Astronomy and Astrophysics 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. http://ads.harvard.edu/books/hsaa/. Retrieved 13 January 2016. 
  7. Asplund, M.; Grevesse, N.; Sauval, A.J. (2006). "The new solar abundances – Part I: the observations". Communications in Asteroseismology 147: 76–79. doi:10.1553/cia147s76. Bibcode2006CoAst.147...76A. 
  8. "Eclipse 99: Frequently Asked Questions". NASA. http://education.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/pages/faq.html. 
  9. Hinshaw, G. (2009). "Five-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe observations: data processing, sky maps, and basic results". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 180 (2): 225–245. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/225. Bibcode2009ApJS..180..225H. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 "Solar System Exploration: Planets: Sun: Facts & Figures". NASA. http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Sun&Display=Facts&System=Metric. 
  11. Mamajek, E.E.; Prsa, A.; Torres, G.; et, al. (2015), "IAU 2015 Resolution B3 on Recommended Nominal Conversion Constants for Selected Solar and Planetary Properties", arXiv:1510.07674 [astro-ph.SR]
  12. Emilio, Marcelo; Kuhn, Jeff R.; Bush, Rock I.; Scholl, Isabelle F. (2012), "Measuring the Solar Radius from Space during the 2003 and 2006 Mercury Transits", The Astrophysical Journal 750 (2): 135, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/135, Bibcode2012ApJ...750..135E 
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Bonanno, A.; Schlattl, H.; Paternò, L. (2002). "The age of the Sun and the relativistic corrections in the EOS". Astronomy and Astrophysics 390 (3): 1115–1118. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020749. Bibcode2002A&A...390.1115B. 
  14. Connelly, JN; Bizzarro, M; Krot, AN; Nordlund, Å; Wielandt, D; Ivanova, MA (2 November 2012). "The Absolute Chronology and Thermal Processing of Solids in the Solar Protoplanetary Disk". Science 338 (6107): 651–655. doi:10.1126/science.1226919. PMID 23118187. Bibcode2012Sci...338..651C. (registration required)
  15. "The Sun's Vital Statistics". Stanford Solar Center. http://solar-center.stanford.edu/vitalstats.html.  Citing Eddy, J. (1979). A New Sun: The Solar Results From Skylab. NASA. p. 37. NASA SP-402. https://history.nasa.gov/SP-402/contents.htm. Retrieved 12 July 2017. 
  16. Woolfson, M. (2000). "The origin and evolution of the solar system". Astronomy & Geophysics 41 (1): 12. doi:10.1046/j.1468-4004.2000.00012.x. Bibcode2000A&G....41a..12W. http://inis.jinr.ru/sl/vol1/_djvu/P_Physics/Woolfson%20M.M.%20Origin%20and%20evolution%20of%20the%20solar%20system%20(IOP)(425s).pdf. Retrieved 12 April 2020. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 Basu, S.; Antia, H.M. (2008). "Helioseismology and Solar Abundances". Physics Reports 457 (5–6): 217–283. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.002. Bibcode2008PhR...457..217B. 
  18. Connelly, James N.; Bizzarro, Martin; Krot, Alexander N.; Nordlund, Åke; Wielandt, Daniel; Ivanova, Marina A. (2 November 2012). "The Absolute Chronology and Thermal Processing of Solids in the Solar Protoplanetary Disk". Science 338 (6107): 651–655. doi:10.1126/science.1226919. PMID 23118187. Bibcode2012Sci...338..651C. 
  19. Lattis, James M. (1994). Between Copernicus and Galileo: Christoph Clavius and the Collapse of Ptolemaic Cosmology. Chicago: The University of Chicago. pp. 3–4. ISBN 0-226-46929-8. 
  20. Barnhart, R.K. (1995). The Barnhart Concise Dictionary of Etymology. HarperCollins. p. 776. ISBN 978-0-06-270084-1. 
  21. 21.0 21.1 Vladimir Orel (2003) A Handbook of Germanic Etymology, Brill
  22. Little, William; Fowler, H.W.; Coulson, J. (1955). "Sol". Oxford Universal Dictionary on Historical Principles (3rd ed.). https://archive.org/details/oxforduniversald07litt. 
  23. heliac (3rd ed.), Oxford University Press, September 2005, http://oed.com/search?searchType=dictionary&q=heliac  (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  24. "Opportunity's View, Sol 959 (Vertical)". NASA. 15 November 2006. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mer/images/pia01892.html. 
  25. Barnhart, R.K. (1995). The Barnhart Concise Dictionary of Etymology. HarperCollins. p. 778. ISBN 978-0-06-270084-1. 
  26. Than, K. (2006). "Astronomers Had it Wrong: Most Stars are Single". Space.com. http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060130_mm_single_stars.html. 
  27. Lada, C.J. (2006). "Stellar multiplicity and the initial mass function: Most stars are single". Astrophysical Journal Letters 640 (1): L63–L66. doi:10.1086/503158. Bibcode2006ApJ...640L..63L. 
  28. 28.0 28.1 Zeilik, M.A.; Gregory, S.A. (1998). Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics (4th ed.). Saunders College Publishing. p. 322. ISBN 978-0-03-006228-5. 
  29. Falk, S.W.; Lattmer, J.M.; Margolis, S.H. (1977). "Are supernovae sources of presolar grains?". Nature 270 (5639): 700–701. doi:10.1038/270700a0. Bibcode1977Natur.270..700F. 
  30. Burton, W.B. (1986). "Stellar parameters". Space Science Reviews 43 (3–4): 244–250. doi:10.1007/BF00190626. 
  31. Bessell, M.S.; Castelli, F.; Plez, B. (1998). "Model atmospheres broad-band colors, bolometric corrections and temperature calibrations for O–M stars". Astronomy and Astrophysics 333: 231–250. Bibcode1998A&A...333..231B. 
  32. "Equinoxes, Solstices, Perihelion, and Aphelion, 2000–2020". US Naval Observatory. 31 January 2008. http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/EarthSeasons.php. 
  33. "Earth at Perihelion and Aphelion: 2001 to 2100". http://www.astropixels.com/ephemeris/perap2001.html. 
  34. Cain, Fraser (15 April 2013). "How long does it take sunlight to reach the Earth?" (in en). https://phys.org/news/2013-04-sunlight-earth.html. 
  35. Simon, A. (2001). The Real Science Behind the X-Files : Microbes, meteorites, and mutants. Simon & Schuster. pp. 25–27. ISBN 978-0-684-85618-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=1gXImRmz7u8C&q=bacteria+that+live+with+out+the+sun&pg=PA26. Retrieved 3 November 2020. 
  36. Beer, J.; McCracken, K.; von Steiger, R. (2012). Cosmogenic Radionuclides: Theory and Applications in the Terrestrial and Space Environments. Springer Science+Business Media. p. 41. ISBN 978-3-642-14651-0. 
  37. Phillips, K.J.H. (1995). Guide to the Sun. Cambridge University Press. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-521-39788-9. 
  38. Godier, S.; Rozelot, J.-P. (2000). "The solar oblateness and its relationship with the structure of the tachocline and of the Sun's subsurface". Astronomy and Astrophysics 355: 365–374. Bibcode2000A&A...355..365G. http://aa.springer.de/papers/0355001/2300365.pdf. Retrieved 22 February 2006. 
  39. "How Round is the Sun?". NASA. 2 October 2008. https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/02oct_oblatesun/. 
  40. "First Ever STEREO Images of the Entire Sun". NASA. 6 February 2011. https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/06feb_fullsun/. 
  41. Jones, G. (16 August 2012). "Sun is the most perfect sphere ever observed in nature". https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/aug/16/sun-perfect-sphere-nature. 
  42. Schutz, B.F. (2003). Gravity from the ground up. Cambridge University Press. pp. 98–99. ISBN 978-0-521-45506-0. 
  43. Phillips, K.J.H. (1995). Guide to the Sun. Cambridge University Press. pp. 78–79. ISBN 978-0-521-39788-9. 
  44. "The Anticlockwise Solar System". Australian Space Academy. https://www.spaceacademy.net.au/library/notes/anticlok.htm. 
  45. 45.0 45.1 Lodders, Katharina (10 July 2003). "Solar System Abundances and Condensation Temperatures of the Elements". The Astrophysical Journal 591 (2): 1220–1247. doi:10.1086/375492. Bibcode2003ApJ...591.1220L. http://weft.astro.washington.edu/courses/astro557/LODDERS.pdf. Retrieved 1 September 2015. 
    Lodders, K. (2003). "Abundances and Condensation Temperatures of the Elements". Meteoritics & Planetary Science 38 (suppl): 5272. Bibcode2003M&PSA..38.5272L. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2003/pdf/5272.pdf. Retrieved 3 August 2008. 
  46. Hansen, C.J.; Kawaler, S.A.; Trimble, V. (2004). Stellar Interiors: Physical Principles, Structure, and Evolution (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 19–20. ISBN 978-0-387-20089-7. 
  47. Alterman, Benjamin L.; Kasper, Justin C.; Leamon, Robert J.; McIntosh, Scott W. (April 2021). "Solar wind helium abundance heralds solar cycle onset". Solar Physics 296 (4): 67. doi:10.1007/s11207-021-01801-9. Bibcode2021SoPh..296...67A. 
  48. Pietrow, A. G. M.; Hoppe, R.; Bergemann, M.; Calvo, F. (2023). "Solar oxygen abundance using SST/CRISP center-to-limb observations of the O I 7772 Å line". Astronomy & Astrophysics 672 (4): L6. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346387. Bibcode2023A&A...672L...6P. 
  49. Hansen, C.J.; Kawaler, S.A.; Trimble, V. (2004). Stellar Interiors: Physical Principles, Structure, and Evolution (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 77–78. ISBN 978-0-387-20089-7. 
  50. Hansen, C.J.; Kawaler, S.A.; Trimble, V. (2004). Stellar Interiors: Physical Principles, Structure, and Evolution (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. § 9.2.3. ISBN 978-0-387-20089-7. 
  51. Iben, I Jnr (1965) "Stellar Evolution. II. The Evolution of a 3 M_{sun} Star from the Main Sequence Through Core Helium Burning". (Astrophysical Journal, vol. 142, p. 1447)
  52. Aller, L.H. (1968). "The chemical composition of the Sun and the solar system". Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of Australia 1 (4): 133. doi:10.1017/S1323358000011048. Bibcode1968PASA....1..133A. 
  53. 53.0 53.1 García, R. (2007). "Tracking solar gravity modes: the dynamics of the solar core". Science 316 (5831): 1591–1593. doi:10.1126/science.1140598. PMID 17478682. Bibcode2007Sci...316.1591G. 
  54. Basu, S. (2009). "Fresh insights on the structure of the solar core". The Astrophysical Journal 699 (2): 1403–1417. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1403. Bibcode2009ApJ...699.1403B. 
  55. 55.0 55.1 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.5 55.6 "NASA/Marshall Solar Physics". Marshall Space Flight Center. 18 January 2007. http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/interior.shtml. 
  56. Broggini, C. (2003). "Physics in Collision, Proceedings of the XXIII International Conference: Nuclear Processes at Solar Energy". XXIII Physics in Collisions Conference. Zeuthen, Germany. p. 21. Bibcode2003phco.conf...21B. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C030626. Retrieved 12 August 2013. 
  57. Goupil, M.J.; Lebreton, Y.; Marques, J.P.; Samadi, R.; Baudin, F. (2011). "Open issues in probing interiors of solar-like oscillating main sequence stars 1. From the Sun to nearly suns". Journal of Physics 271 (1): 012031. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/271/1/012031. Bibcode2011JPhCS.271a2031G. 
  58. The Borexino Collaboration (2020). "Experimental evidence of neutrinos produced in the CNO fusion cycle in the Sun". Nature 587 (?): 577–582. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2934-0. PMID 33239797. Bibcode2020Natur.587..577B. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2934-0. Retrieved 26 November 2020. 
  59. 59.0 59.1 59.2 Phillips, K.J.H. (1995). Guide to the Sun. Cambridge University Press. pp. 47–53. ISBN 978-0-521-39788-9. 
  60. Zirker, J.B. (2002). Journey from the Center of the Sun. Princeton University Press. pp. 15–34. ISBN 978-0-691-05781-1. https://archive.org/details/journeyfromcente0000zirk/page/15. 
  61. Shu, F.H. (1982). The Physical Universe: An Introduction to Astronomy. University Science Books. p. 102. ISBN 978-0-935702-05-7. https://archive.org/details/physicaluniverse00shuf/page/102. 
  62. "Ask Us: Sun". NASA. 2012. https://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_sun.html. 
  63. Cohen, H. (9 November 1998). "Table of temperatures, power densities, luminosities by radius in the Sun". Contemporary Physics Education Project. http://fusedweb.llnl.gov/CPEP/Chart_Pages/5.Plasmas/Sunlayers.html. 
  64. "Lazy Sun is less energetic than compost". 17 April 2012. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/04/17/3478276.htm. 
  65. Haubold, H.J.; Mathai, A.M. (1994). "Solar Nuclear Energy Generation & The Chlorine Solar Neutrino Experiment". AIP Conference Proceedings 320 (1994): 102–116. doi:10.1063/1.47009. Bibcode1995AIPC..320..102H. 
  66. Myers, S.T. (18 February 1999). "Lecture 11 – Stellar Structure I: Hydrostatic Equilibrium". http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/~smyers/courses/astro12/L11.html. 
  67. 67.0 67.1 67.2 67.3 67.4 "Sun". NASA. http://mynasa.nasa.gov/worldbook/sun_worldbook.html. 
  68. Tobias, S.M. (2005). "The solar tachocline: Formation, stability and its role in the solar dynamo". in A.M. Soward. Fluid Dynamics and Dynamos in Astrophysics and Geophysics. CRC Press. pp. 193–235. ISBN 978-0-8493-3355-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=PLNwoJ6qFoEC&pg=PA193. Retrieved 22 August 2020. 
  69. Mullan, D.J (2000). "Solar Physics: From the Deep Interior to the Hot Corona". in Page, D.. From the Sun to the Great Attractor. Springer. p. 22. ISBN 978-3-540-41064-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=rk5fxs55_OkC&pg=PA22. Retrieved 22 August 2020. 
  70. 70.0 70.1 70.2 70.3 70.4 70.5 70.6 Abhyankar, K.D. (1977). "A Survey of the Solar Atmospheric Models". Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India 5: 40–44. Bibcode1977BASI....5...40A. http://prints.iiap.res.in/handle/2248/510. Retrieved 12 July 2009. 
  71. Gibson, Edward G. (1973). The Quiet Sun (NASA SP-303). NASA. 
  72. Shu, F.H. (1991). The Physics of Astrophysics. 1. University Science Books. ISBN 978-0-935702-64-4. 
  73. Rast, M.; Nordlund, Å.; Stein, R.; Toomre, J. (1993). "Ionization Effects in Three-Dimensional Solar Granulation Simulations". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 408 (1): L53–L56. doi:10.1086/186829. Bibcode1993ApJ...408L..53R. 
  74. Parnel, C.. "Discovery of Helium". University of St Andrews. http://www-solar.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~clare/Lockyer/helium.html. 
  75. ""Beyond the Blue Horizon" – A Total Solar Eclipse Chase". 1999-08-05. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990805111308.htm. 
  76. Solanki, S.K.; Livingston, W.; Ayres, T. (1994). "New Light on the Heart of Darkness of the Solar Chromosphere". Science 263 (5143): 64–66. doi:10.1126/science.263.5143.64. PMID 17748350. Bibcode1994Sci...263...64S. 
  77. De Pontieu, B. (2007). "Chromospheric Alfvénic Waves Strong Enough to Power the Solar Wind". Science 318 (5856): 1574–1577. doi:10.1126/science.1151747. PMID 18063784. Bibcode2007Sci...318.1574D. 
  78. 78.0 78.1 78.2 Hansteen, V.H.; Leer, E.; Holzer, T.E. (1997). "The role of helium in the outer solar atmosphere". The Astrophysical Journal 482 (1): 498–509. doi:10.1086/304111. Bibcode1997ApJ...482..498H. 
  79. 79.0 79.1 79.2 79.3 79.4 79.5 79.6 Erdèlyi, R.; Ballai, I. (2007). "Heating of the solar and stellar coronae: a review". Astron. Nachr. 328 (8): 726–733. doi:10.1002/asna.200710803. Bibcode2007AN....328..726E. 
  80. 80.0 80.1 80.2 80.3 80.4 Dwivedi, B.N. (2006). "Our ultraviolet Sun". Current Science 91 (5): 587–595. http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/sep102006/587.pdf. Retrieved 22 March 2015. 
  81. 81.0 81.1 81.2 81.3 81.4 81.5 81.6 Russell, C.T. (2001). "Solar wind and interplanetary magnetic filed: A tutorial". in Song, Paul. Space Weather (Geophysical Monograph). American Geophysical Union. pp. 73–88. ISBN 978-0-87590-984-4. http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/personnel/russell/papers/SolWindTutorial.pdf. Retrieved 11 July 2009. 
  82. A.G, Emslie; J.A., Miller (2003). "Particle Acceleration". in Dwivedi, B.N.. Dynamic Sun. Cambridge University Press. p. 275. ISBN 978-0-521-81057-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=W_oZYFplXX0C&pg=PA275. 
  83. "A Star with two North Poles". NASA. 22 April 2003. https://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/22apr_currentsheet.htm. 
  84. Riley, P.; Linker, J.A.; Mikić, Z. (2002). "Modeling the heliospheric current sheet: Solar cycle variations". Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (A7): SSH 8–1. doi:10.1029/2001JA000299. CiteID 1136. Bibcode2002JGRA..107.1136R. 
  85. "The Distortion of the Heliosphere: Our Interstellar Magnetic Compass" (Press release). European Space Agency. 2005. Archived from the original on 4 June 2012. Retrieved 22 March 2006.
  86. Anderson, Rupert W. (2015). The Cosmic Compendium: Interstellar Travel. Lulu.com. pp. 163–164. ISBN 978-1-329-02202-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=JxauCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA163. 
  87. "Voyager – the Interstellar Mission". https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/interstellar-mission/#:~:text=On%20Aug.,billion%20kilometers)%20from%20the%20sun.. 
  88. Dunbar, Brian (2 March 2015). "Components of the Heliosphere". https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/science/heliosphere-components.html. 
  89. 89.0 89.1 89.2 Hatfield, Miles (13 December 2021). "NASA Enters the Solar Atmosphere for the First Time". https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2021/nasa-enters-the-solar-atmosphere-for-the-first-time-bringing-new-discoveries.  This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  90. "GMS: Animation: NASA's Parker Solar Probe Enters Solar Atmosphere" (in en). 14 December 2021. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/14036. 
  91. "SVS: Parker Solar Probe: Crossing the Alfven Surface" (in en). 14 December 2021. https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4958.  This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  92. "What Color is the Sun?". Universe Today. http://www.universetoday.com/18689/color-of-the-sun/. 
  93. "What Color is the Sun?". Stanford Solar Center. http://solar-center.stanford.edu/SID/activities/GreenSun.html. 
  94. Wilk, S.R. (2009). "The Yellow Sun Paradox". Optics & Photonics News: 12–13. http://www.osa-opn.org/Content/ViewFile.aspx?id=11147. 
  95. Karl S. Kruszelnicki (17 April 2012). "Dr Karl's Great Moments In Science: Lazy Sun is less energetic than compost". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/04/17/3478276.htm. "Every second, the Sun burns 620 million tonnes of hydrogen..." 
  96. "Construction of a Composite Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) Time Series from 1978 to present". http://www.pmodwrc.ch/pmod.php?topic=tsi/composite/SolarConstant. 
  97. El-Sharkawi, Mohamed A. (2005). Electric energy. CRC Press. pp. 87–88. ISBN 978-0-8493-3078-0. 
  98. "Solar radiation". http://curry.eas.gatech.edu/Courses/6140/ency/Chapter3/Ency_Atmos/Radiation_Solar.pdf. 
  99. "Reference Solar Spectral Irradiance: Air Mass 1.5". http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/spectra/am1.5/. 
  100. Phillips, K.J.H. (1995). Guide to the Sun. Cambridge University Press. pp. 14–15, 34–38. ISBN 978-0-521-39788-9. 
  101. Barsh, G.S. (2003). "What Controls Variation in Human Skin Color?". PLOS Biology 1 (1): e7. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000027. PMID 14551921. 
  102. "Ancient sunlight". NASA. 2007. http://sunearthday.nasa.gov/2007/locations/ttt_sunlight.php. 
  103. Stix, M. (2003). "On the time scale of energy transport in the sun". Solar Physics 212 (1): 3–6. doi:10.1023/A:1022952621810. Bibcode2003SoPh..212....3S. 
  104. Schlattl, H. (2001). "Three-flavor oscillation solutions for the solar neutrino problem". Physical Review D 64 (1): 013009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.013009. Bibcode2001PhRvD..64a3009S. 
  105. Charbonneau, P. (2014). "Solar Dynamo Theory". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 52: 251–290. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040012. Bibcode2014ARA&A..52..251C. 
  106. Zirker, J.B. (2002). Journey from the Center of the Sun. Princeton University Press. pp. 119–120. ISBN 978-0-691-05781-1. https://archive.org/details/journeyfromcente0000zirk/page/119. 
  107. Lang, Kenneth R. (2008). The Sun from Space. Springer-Verlag. p. 75. ISBN 978-3-540-76952-1. 
  108. Wang, Y.-M.; Sheeley, N.R. (2003). "Modeling the Sun's Large-Scale Magnetic Field during the Maunder Minimum". The Astrophysical Journal 591 (2): 1248–1256. doi:10.1086/375449. Bibcode2003ApJ...591.1248W. 
  109. "The Largest Sunspot in Ten Years". Goddard Space Flight Center. 30 March 2001. http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/gsfc/spacesci/solarexp/sunspot.htm. 
  110. Hale, G.E.; Ellerman, F.; Nicholson, S.B.; Joy, A.H. (1919). "The Magnetic Polarity of Sun-Spots". The Astrophysical Journal 49: 153. doi:10.1086/142452. Bibcode1919ApJ....49..153H. 
  111. "NASA Satellites Capture Start of New Solar Cycle". PhysOrg. 4 January 2008. http://www.physorg.com/news119271347.html. 
  112. "Sun flips magnetic field". CNN. 16 February 2001. http://edition.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/02/16/sun.flips/. 
  113. Phillips, T. (15 February 2001). "The Sun Does a Flip". NASA. https://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast15feb_1.htm. 
  114. Zirker, J.B. (2002). Journey from the Center of the Sun. Princeton University Press. pp. 120–127. ISBN 978-0-691-05781-1. https://archive.org/details/journeyfromcente0000zirk/page/120. 
  115. Willson, R.C.; Hudson, H.S. (1991). "The Sun's luminosity over a complete solar cycle". Nature 351 (6321): 42–44. doi:10.1038/351042a0. Bibcode1991Natur.351...42W. 
  116. Eddy, John A. (June 1976). "The Maunder Minimum". Science 192 (4245): 1189–1202. doi:10.1126/science.192.4245.1189. PMID 17771739. Bibcode1976Sci...192.1189E. 
  117. Lean, J.; Skumanich, A.; White, O. (1992). "Estimating the Sun's radiative output during the Maunder Minimum". Geophysical Research Letters 19 (15): 1591–1594. doi:10.1029/92GL01578. Bibcode1992GeoRL..19.1591L. https://zenodo.org/record/1231321. Retrieved 16 December 2019. 
  118. Mackay, R.M.; Khalil, M.A.K (2000). "Greenhouse gases and global warming". in Singh, S.N.. Trace Gas Emissions and Plants. Springer. pp. 1–28. ISBN 978-0-7923-6545-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=tQBS3bAX8fUC&q=solar+minimum+dendochronology&pg=PA1. Retrieved 3 November 2020. 
  119. Johnson-Groh, Mara (17 December 2019). "SDO sees new kind of magnetic explosion on sun" (in en). https://phys.org/news/2019-12-sdo-kind-magnetic-explosion-sun.html. 
  120. "The 100 nearest star systems". http://www.astro.gsu.edu/RECONS/TOP100.posted.htm. 
  121. Zirker, Jack B. (2002). Journey from the Center of the Sun. Princeton University Press. pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-0-691-05781-1. 
  122. Amelin, Y.; Krot, A.; Hutcheon, I.; Ulyanov, A. (2002). "Lead isotopic ages of chondrules and calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions". Science 297 (5587): 1678–1683. doi:10.1126/science.1073950. PMID 12215641. Bibcode2002Sci...297.1678A. 
  123. Baker, J.; Bizzarro, M.; Wittig, N.; Connelly, J.; Haack, H. (2005). "Early planetesimal melting from an age of 4.5662 Gyr for differentiated meteorites". Nature 436 (7054): 1127–1131. doi:10.1038/nature03882. PMID 16121173. Bibcode2005Natur.436.1127B. 
  124. Williams, J. (2010). "The astrophysical environment of the solar birthplace". Contemporary Physics 51 (5): 381–396. doi:10.1080/00107511003764725. Bibcode2010ConPh..51..381W. 
  125. Glozman, Igor (2022). "Formation of the Solar System". https://people.highline.edu/iglozman/classes/astronotes/solsys_form.htm. 
  126. D'Angelo, G.; Lubow, S. H. (2010). "Three-dimensional Disk-Planet Torques in a Locally Isothermal Disk". The Astrophysical Journal 724 (1): 730–747. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/730. Bibcode2010ApJ...724..730D. 
  127. Lubow, S. H.; Ida, S. (2011). "Planet Migration". in S. Seager.. Exoplanets. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ. pp. 347–371. Bibcode2010exop.book..347L. 
  128. Jones, Andrew Zimmerman (May 30, 2019). "How Stars Make All of the Elements" (in en). https://www.thoughtco.com/stellar-nucleosynthesis-2699311. 
  129. "Astronomers Find Sun's Sibling 'HD 162826'". Nature World News. May 9, 2014. http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/6974/20140509/astronomers-find-suns-sibling-called-hd-162826.htm. 
  130. Matt Williams (2018-11-21). "Astronomers Find One of the Sun's Sibling Stars. Born From the Same Solar Nebula Billions of Years Ago". https://www.universetoday.com/140598/astronomers-find-one-of-the-suns-sibling-stars-born-from-the-same-solar-nebula-billion-of-years-ago/. 
  131. Goldsmith, D.; Owen, T. (2001). The search for life in the universe. University Science Books. p. 96. ISBN 978-1-891389-16-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=Q17NmHY6wloC&pg=PA96. Retrieved 22 August 2020. 
  132. Source, News Staff / (2022-08-12). "ESA's Gaia Mission Sheds New Light on Past and Future of Our Sun | Sci.News" (in en-US). https://www.sci.news/astronomy/sun-future-11093.html. 
  133. 133.0 133.1 133.2 Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dal A (2017). An introduction to modern astrophysics (Second ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 350, 447, 448, 457. ISBN 978-1-108-42216-1. 
  134. "Earth Won't Die as Soon as Thought". 22 January 2014. https://www.science.org/content/article/earth-wont-die-soon-thought. 
  135. Snyder-Beattie, Andrew E.; Bonsall, Michael B. (30 March 2022). "Catastrophe risk can accelerate unlikely evolutionary transitions". Proceedings of the Royal Society B 289 (1971). doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.2711. PMID 35350860. 
  136. "Red Giant Stars: Facts, Definition & the Future of the Sun". http://www.space.com/22471-red-giant-stars.html. 
  137. 137.0 137.1 137.2 137.3 137.4 137.5 Schröder, K.-P.; Connon Smith, R. (2008). "Distant future of the Sun and Earth revisited". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 386 (1): 155–163. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13022.x. Bibcode2008MNRAS.386..155S. 
  138. Boothroyd, A.I.; Sackmann, I.-J. (1999). "The CNO Isotopes: Deep Circulation in Red Giants and First and Second Dredge-up". The Astrophysical Journal 510 (1): 232–250. doi:10.1086/306546. Bibcode1999ApJ...510..232B. 
  139. "The End Of The Sun". http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~infocom/The%20Website/end.html. 
  140. Vassiliadis, E.; Wood, P.R. (1993). "Evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars to the end of the asymptotic giant branch with mass loss". The Astrophysical Journal 413: 641. doi:10.1086/173033. Bibcode1993ApJ...413..641V. 
  141. Bloecker, T. (1995). "Stellar evolution of low and intermediate-mass stars. I. Mass loss on the AGB and its consequences for stellar evolution". Astronomy and Astrophysics 297: 727. Bibcode1995A&A...297..727B. 
  142. Bloecker, T. (1995). "Stellar evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars. II. Post-AGB evolution". Astronomy and Astrophysics 299: 755. Bibcode1995A&A...299..755B. 
  143. Johnson-Groh, Mara (August 25, 2020). "The end of the universe may be marked by 'black dwarf supernova' explosions". https://www.livescience.com/black-dwarf-supernovae-end-universe.html. 
  144. Lewis, John, ed (2004). Physics and Chemistry of the Solar System (2 ed.). Elsevier. p. 147. 
  145. See Figure 5 and reference in Valentina Zharkova (Jun 24, 2019). "Oscillations of the baseline of solar magnetic field and solar irradiance on a millennial timescale". Scientific Reports 9 (1): 9197. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45584-3. PMID 31235834.  Although this paper was retracted by the journal because of an error about the distance between the Sun and Earth, Figure 5 is based on another paper and is unaffected by the problem.
  146. Paul Jose (Apr 1965). "Sun's Motion and Sunspots". The Astronomical Journal 70: 193–200. doi:10.1086/109714. Bibcode1965AJ.....70..193J. http://www.landscheidt.info/pdf/jose1965.pdf. Retrieved 22 March 2020.  The value of 24° comes from (360)(15 J − 6 S)/(S − J), where S and J are the periods of Saturn and Jupiter respectively.
  147. Zharkova, V. V.; Shepherd, S. J.; Zharkov, S. I.; Popova, E. (Mar 4, 2020). "Retraction Note: Oscillations of the baseline of solar magnetic field and solar irradiance on a millennial timescale". Scientific Reports 10 (1): 4336. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61020-3. PMID 32132618. Bibcode2020NatSR..10.4336Z. 
  148. "StarChild Question of the Month - Does the Sun move around the Milky Way?". February 2000. http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question18.html. 
  149. Siegel, Ethan (August 30, 2018). "Our Motion Through Space Isn't A Vortex, But Something Far More Interesting". https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/08/30/our-motion-through-space-isnt-a-vortex-but-something-far-more-interesting/. 
  150. Currin, Grant (August 30, 2020). "How long is a galactic year?". https://www.livescience.com/how-long-galactic-year.html. 
  151. Leverington, David (2003). Babylon to Voyager and beyond: a history of planetary astronomy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 6–7. ISBN 978-0-521-80840-8. 
  152. Sider, D. (1973). "Anaxagoras on the Size of the Sun". Classical Philology 68 (2): 128–129. doi:10.1086/365951. 
  153. Goldstein, B.R. (1967). "The Arabic Version of Ptolemy's Planetary Hypotheses". Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 57 (4): 9–12. doi:10.2307/1006040. 
  154. Ead, Hamed A.. Averroes As A Physician. University of Cairo. 
  155. "Galileo Galilei (1564–1642)". BBC. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/galilei_galileo.shtml. 
  156. A short History of scientific ideas to 1900, C. Singer, Oxford University Press, 1959, p. 151.
  157. The Arabian Science, C. Ronan, pp. 201–244 in The Cambridge Illustrated History of the World's Science, Cambridge University Press, 1983; at pp. 213–214.
  158. Goldstein, Bernard R. (March 1972). "Theory and Observation in Medieval Astronomy". Isis 63 (1): 39–47 [44]. doi:10.1086/350839. Bibcode1972Isis...63...39G. 
  159. "Sir Isaac Newton (1643–1727)". BBC Teach (BBC). https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/newton_isaac.shtml. 
  160. "Herschel Discovers Infrared Light". Cool Cosmos. http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/cosmic_classroom/classroom_activities/herschel_bio.html. 
  161. 161.0 161.1 Thomson, W. (1862). "On the Age of the Sun's Heat". Macmillan's Magazine 5: 388–393. http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/on_the_age_of_the_suns_heat.html. Retrieved 25 August 2006. 
  162. Stacey, Frank D. (2000). "Kelvin's age of the Earth paradox revisited". Journal of Geophysical Research 105 (B6): 13155–13158. doi:10.1029/2000JB900028. Bibcode2000JGR...10513155S. 
  163. Lockyer, J.N. (1890). "The meteoritic hypothesis; a statement of the results of a spectroscopic inquiry into the origin of cosmical systems". London and New York. Bibcode1890mhsr.book.....L. 
  164. Darden, L. (1998). "The Nature of Scientific Inquiry". http://www.philosophy.umd.edu/Faculty/LDarden/sciinq/. 
  165. Hawking, S.W. (2001). The Universe in a Nutshell. Bantam Books. ISBN 978-0-553-80202-3. 
  166. "Studying the stars, testing relativity: Sir Arthur Eddington". European Space Agency. 2005. http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMDYPXO4HD_index_0.html. 
  167. Bethe, H.; Critchfield, C. (1938). "On the Formation of Deuterons by Proton Combination". Physical Review 54 (10): 862. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.54.862.2. Bibcode1938PhRv...54Q.862B. 
  168. Bethe, H. (1939). "Energy Production in Stars". Physical Review 55 (1): 434–456. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.434. PMID 17835673. Bibcode1939PhRv...55..434B. 
  169. Burbidge, E.M.; Burbidge, G.R.; Fowler, W.A.; Hoyle, F. (1957). "Synthesis of the Elements in Stars". Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (4): 547–650. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547. Bibcode1957RvMP...29..547B. https://authors.library.caltech.edu/45747/1/BURrmp57.pdf. Retrieved 12 April 2020. 
  170. Wade, M. (2008). "Pioneer 6-7-8-9-E". Encyclopedia Astronautica. http://www.astronautix.com/craft/pio6789e.htm. 
  171. "Solar System Exploration: Missions: By Target: Our Solar System: Past: Pioneer 9". NASA. http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/profile.cfm?MCode=Pioneer_09. "NASA maintained contact with Pioneer 9 until May 1983" 
  172. 172.0 172.1 Burlaga, L.F. (2001). "Magnetic Fields and plasmas in the inner heliosphere: Helios results". Planetary and Space Science 49 (14–15): 1619–1627. doi:10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00098-8. Bibcode2001P&SS...49.1619B. https://zenodo.org/record/1259695. Retrieved 25 August 2019. 
  173. 173.0 173.1 173.2 Biemont, E. (1978). "Abundances of singly ionized elements of the iron group in the Sun". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 184 (4): 683–694. doi:10.1093/mnras/184.4.683. Bibcode1978MNRAS.184..683B. 
  174. Ross and Aller 1976, Withbroe 1976, Hauge and Engvold 1977, cited in Biemont 1978.
  175. Corliss and Bozman (1962 cited in Biemont 1978) and Warner (1967 cited in Biemont 1978)
  176. Smith (1976 cited in Biemont 1978)
  177. Signer and Suess 1963; Manuel 1967; Marti 1969; Kuroda and Manuel 1970; Srinivasan and Manuel 1971, all cited in Manuel and Hwaung 1983
  178. Kuroda and Manuel 1970 cited in Manuel and Hwaung 1983:7
  179. 179.0 179.1 Manuel, O.K.; Hwaung, G. (1983). "Solar abundances of the elements". Meteoritics 18 (3): 209–222. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.1983.tb00822.x. Bibcode1983Metic..18..209M. 
  180. Burkepile, C.J. (1998). "Solar Maximum Mission Overview". http://web.hao.ucar.edu/public/research/svosa/smm/smm_mission.html. 
  181. "Result of Re-entry of the Solar X-ray Observatory "Yohkoh" (SOLAR-A) to the Earth's Atmosphere" (Press release). Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. 2005. Archived from the original on 10 August 2013. Retrieved 22 March 2006.
  182. "Mission extensions approved for science missions". 7 October 2009. http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=45685. 
  183. "NASA Successfully Launches a New Eye on the Sun". 11 February 2010. http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2010/feb/HQ_10-040_SDO_launch.html. 
  184. "Sungrazing Comets". LASCO (US Naval Research Laboratory). http://sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil/. 
  185. JPL/CALTECH (2005). "Ulysses: Primary Mission Results". NASA. http://ulysses.jpl.nasa.gov/science/mission_primary.html. 
  186. Calaway, M.J.; Stansbery, Eileen K.; Keller, Lindsay P. (2009). "Genesis capturing the Sun: Solar wind irradiation at Lagrange 1". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 267 (7): 1101–1108. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2009.01.132. Bibcode2009NIMPB.267.1101C. https://zenodo.org/record/1259269. Retrieved 13 July 2019. 
  187. "STEREO Spacecraft & Instruments". 8 March 2006. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stereo/spacecraft/index.html. 
  188. Howard, R.A.; Moses, J.D.; Socker, D.G.; Dere, K.P.; Cook, J.W. (2002). "Sun Earth Connection Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation (SECCHI)". Advances in Space Research 29 (12): 2017–2026. doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9341-4. Bibcode2008SSRv..136...67H. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/21196/1/secchi%20space%20sci%20rev.pdf. Retrieved 25 August 2019. 
  189. Meghan Bartels. "Our sun will never look the same again thanks to two solar probes and one giant telescope". Space.com. https://www.space.com/three-big-missions-spotlight-the-sun.html. 
  190. "Solar Orbiter" (in en). https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Solar_Orbiter. 
  191. Kumar, Chethan (February 2, 2022). "2 key Gaganyaan crew abort tests, Aditya top priority" (in en). https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/2-key-gaganyaan-crew-abort-tests-aditya-top-priority/articleshow/89305880.cms. 
  192. "Aditya L-1: After Chandrayaan 2, ISRO to pursue India's first mission to the Sun in 2020". 25 July 2019. https://www.firstpost.com/tech/science/aditya-l-1-after-chandrayaan-2-isro-to-pursue-indias-first-mission-to-the-sun-in-2020-7053851.html. 
  193. Alfvén, H. (1947). "Magneto-hydrodynamic waves, and the heating of the solar corona". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 107 (2): 211–219. doi:10.1093/mnras/107.2.211. Bibcode1947MNRAS.107..211A. 
  194. Parker, E.N. (1988). "Nanoflares and the solar X-ray corona". Astrophysical Journal 330 (1): 474. doi:10.1086/166485. Bibcode1988ApJ...330..474P. 
  195. Sturrock, P.A.; Uchida, Y. (1981). "Coronal heating by stochastic magnetic pumping". Astrophysical Journal 246 (1): 331. doi:10.1086/158926. Bibcode1981ApJ...246..331S. 
  196. Kasting, J.F.; Ackerman, T.P. (1986). "Climatic Consequences of Very High Carbon Dioxide Levels in the Earth's Early Atmosphere". Science 234 (4782): 1383–1385. doi:10.1126/science.11539665. PMID 11539665. Bibcode1986Sci...234.1383K. https://zenodo.org/record/1230890. Retrieved 13 July 2019. 
  197. Rosing, Minik T.; Bird, Dennis K.; Sleep, Norman H.; Bjerrum, Christian J. (1 April 2010). "No climate paradox under the faint early Sun". Nature 464 (7289): 744–747. doi:10.1038/nature08955. PMID 20360739. Bibcode2010Natur.464..744R. 
  198. White, T.J.; Mainster, M.A.; Wilson, P.W.; Tips, J.H. (1971). "Chorioretinal temperature increases from solar observation". Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 33 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/BF02476660. PMID 5551296. 
  199. Tso, M.O.M.; La Piana, F.G. (1975). "The Human Fovea After Sungazing". Transactions of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology 79 (6): OP788–95. PMID 1209815. 
  200. Hope-Ross, M.W.; Mahon, GJ; Gardiner, TA; Archer, DB (1993). "Ultrastructural findings in solar retinopathy". Eye 7 (4): 29–33. doi:10.1038/eye.1993.7. PMID 8325420. 
  201. Schatz, H.; Mendelblatt, F. (1973). "Solar Retinopathy from Sun-Gazing Under Influence of LSD". British Journal of Ophthalmology 57 (4): 270–273. doi:10.1136/bjo.57.4.270. PMID 4707624. 
  202. Ham, W.T. Jr.; Mueller, H.A.; Sliney, D.H. (1976). "Retinal sensitivity to damage from short wavelength light". Nature 260 (5547): 153–155. doi:10.1038/260153a0. PMID 815821. Bibcode1976Natur.260..153H. 
  203. Ham, W.T. Jr.; Mueller, H.A.; Ruffolo, J.J. Jr.; Guerry, D. III (1980). "Solar Retinopathy as a function of Wavelength: its Significance for Protective Eyewear". in Williams, T.P.. The Effects of Constant Light on Visual Processes. Plenum Press. pp. 319–346. ISBN 978-0-306-40328-6. 
  204. Kardos, T. (2003). Earth science. J.W. Walch. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-8251-4500-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=xI6EDV_PRr4C&pg=PT102. Retrieved 22 August 2020. 
  205. Macdonald, Lee (2012). "Equipment for Observing the Sun". How to Observe the Sun Safely. Patrick Moore's Practical Astronomy Series. New York: Springer Science + Business Media. p. 17. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3825-0_2. ISBN 978-1-4614-3824-3. "Never look directly at the Sun through any form of optical equipment, even for an instant. A brief glimpse of the Sun through a telescope is enough to cause permanent eye damage, or even blindness. Even looking at the Sun with the naked eye for more than a second or two is not safe. Do not assume that it is safe to look at the Sun through a filter, no matter how dark the filter appears to be." 
  206. Haber, Jorg; Magnor, Marcus; Seidel, Hans-Peter (2005). "Physically based Simulation of Twilight Phenomena". ACM Transactions on Graphics 24 (4): 1353–1373. doi:10.1145/1095878.1095884. 
  207. Piggin, I.G. (1972). "Diurnal asymmetries in global radiation". Archiv für Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Serie B 20 (1): 41–48. doi:10.1007/BF02243313. Bibcode1972AMGBB..20...41P. 
  208. "The Green Flash". BBC. https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/features/understanding/greenflash.shtml. 
  209. Coleman, J.A.; Davidson, George (2015). The Dictionary of Mythology: An A–Z of Themes, Legends, and Heroes. London: Arcturus Publishing Limited. p. 316. ISBN 978-1-78404-478-7. 
  210. 210.0 210.1 210.2 210.3 Black, Jeremy; Green, Anthony (1992). Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia: An Illustrated Dictionary. The British Museum Press. pp. 182–184. ISBN 978-0-7141-1705-8. https://books.google.com/books?id=05LXAAAAMAAJ&q=Inana. Retrieved 22 August 2020. 
  211. 211.0 211.1 211.2 Nemet-Nejat, Karen Rhea (1998), Daily Life in Ancient Mesopotamia, Greenwood, p. 203, ISBN 978-0-313-29497-6, https://archive.org/details/dailylifeinancie00neme/page/203 
  212. Teeter, Emily (2011). Religion and Ritual in Ancient Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84855-8. 
  213. Frankfort, Henri (2011). Ancient Egyptian Religion: an Interpretation. Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-41138-5. 
  214. "Planet". Oxford Dictionaries. December 2007. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/american_english/planet. 
  215. Goldstein, Bernard R. (1997). "Saving the phenomena : the background to Ptolemy's planetary theory". Journal for the History of Astronomy 28 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1177/002182869702800101. Bibcode1997JHA....28....1G. 
  216. Ptolemy; Toomer, G.J. (1998). Ptolemy's Almagest. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00260-6. 
  217. Mallory, James P.; Adams, Douglas Q., eds (1997). "Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture". Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. London: Routledge. (EIEC). ISBN 978-1-884964-98-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=tzU3RIV2BWIC&q=Sun+goddess. Retrieved 20 October 2017. 
  218. 218.0 218.1 Mallory, J.P. (1989). In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology and Myth. Thames & Hudson. p. 129. ISBN 978-0-500-27616-7. https://archive.org/details/insearchofindoeu00jpma. 
  219. Hesiod, Theogony 371
  220. Burkert, Walter (1985). Greek Religion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 120. ISBN 978-0-674-36281-9. 
  221. Malachi 4:2
  222. Bible, Book of Malachi, King James Version, https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Malachi+4&version=KJV, retrieved 20 October 2017 
  223. Spargo, Emma Jane Marie (1953). The Category of the Aesthetic in the Philosophy of Saint Bonaventure. St. Bonaventure, New York; E. Nauwelaerts, Louvain, Belgium; F. Schöningh, Paderborn, Germany: The Franciscan Institute. p. 86. https://books.google.com/books?id=SUkWAAAAMAAJ&q=sol+iustitiae+malachiae+IV+2&pg=PA86. Retrieved 3 November 2020. 
  224. Owen Chadwick (1998). A History of Christianity. St. Martin's Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-312-18723-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=qugouOh3KjMC&pg=PA22. Retrieved 15 November 2015. 
  225. 225.0 225.1 Townsend, Richard (1979). State and Cosmos in the Art of Tenochtitlan. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. p. 66. https://archive.org/details/statecosmosinart00town. 
  226. 226.0 226.1 Roberts, Jeremy (2010). Japanese Mythology A To Z (2nd ed.). New York: Chelsea House Publishers. pp. 4–5. ISBN 978-1-60413-435-3. 
  227. Wheeler, Post (1952). The Sacred Scriptures of the Japanese. New York: Henry Schuman. pp. 393–395. ISBN 978-1-4254-8787-4. 

Further reading

External links