Blackboard bold

From HandWiki
Short description: Typeface style used in Mathematics
A blackboard displaying the definition: The set of complex numbers consists of all quantities a + bi such that a and b are elements of the real numbers, and i squared equals negative one. Symbolically,
Blackboard bold used on a blackboard

Blackboard bold is a style of writing bold symbols on a blackboard by doubling certain strokes, commonly used in mathematical lectures, and the derived style of typeface used in printed mathematical texts. The style is most commonly used to represent the number sets (natural numbers), (integers), (rational numbers), (real numbers), and (complex numbers).

To imitate a bold typeface on a typewriter, a character can be typed over itself (called double-striking);[1] symbols thus produced are called double-struck, and this name is sometimes adopted for blackboard bold symbols,[2] for instance in Unicode grapheme names.

In typography, a typeface with characters that are not solid is called inline, handtooled, or open face.[3]

History

Typewritten lecture notes by Gunning (1966), showing "blackboard bold" style R and C achieved by double-striking each letter with significant offset[4]
Typewritten lecture notes by Narasimhan (1966), with "blackboard bold" style R and C achieved with an inline typewriter face[5]

Traditionally, various symbols were indicated by boldface in print but on blackboards and in manuscripts "by wavy underscoring, or enclosure in a circle, or even by wavy overscoring".[6]

Most typewriters have no dedicated bold characters at all. To produce a bold effect on a typewriter, a character can be double-struck with or without a small offset. By the mid-1960s, typewriter accessories such as the "Doublebold" could automatically double-strike every character while engaged.[7] While this method makes a character bolder, and can effectively emphasize words or passages, in isolation a double-struck character is not always clearly different from its single-struck counterpart.[8][9]

Blackboard bold originated from the attempt to write bold symbols on typewriters and blackboards that were legible but distinct, perhaps starting in the late 1950s in France, and then taking hold at the Princeton University mathematics department in the early 1960s.[8][10] Mathematical authors began typing faux-bold letters by double-striking them with a significant offset or over-striking them with the letter I, creating new symbols such as IR, IN, CC, or ZZ; at the blackboard, lecturers began writing bold symbols with certain doubled strokes.[8][10] The notation caught on: blackboard bold spread from classroom to classroom and is now used around the world.[8]

A page from Loomis & Sternberg (1968), showing an early example of "blackboard bold" style R and C in a printed book[11]

The style made its way into print starting in the mid-1960s. Early examples include Robert Gunning and Hugo Rossi's Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables (1965)[12][10] and Lynn Loomis and Shlomo Sternberg's Advanced Calculus (1968).[11] Initial adoption was sporadic, however, and most publishers continued using boldface. In 1979, Wiley recommended its authors avoid "double-backed shadow or outline letters, sometimes called blackboard bold", because they could not always be printed;[13] in 1982, Wiley refused to include blackboard bold characters in mathematical books because the type was difficult and expensive to obtain.[14]

Donald Knuth preferred boldface to blackboard bold and so did not include blackboard bold in the Computer Modern typeface that he created for the TeX mathematical typesetting system he first released in 1978.[14] When Knuth's 1984 The TeXbook needed an example of blackboard bold for the index, he produced IR using the letters I and R with a negative space between;[15] in 1988 Robert Messer extended this to a full set of "poor man's blackboard bold" macros, overtyping each capital letter with carefully placed I characters or vertical lines.[16]

Not all mathematical authors were satisfied with such workarounds. The American Mathematical Society created a simple chalk-style blackboard bold typeface in 1985 to go with the AMS-TeX package created by Michael Spivak, accessed using the \Bbb command (for "blackboard bold"); in 1990, the AMS released an update with a new inline-style blackboard bold font intended to better match the Times New Roman font.[17] Since then, a variety of other blackboard bold typefaces have been created, some following the style of traditional inline typefaces and others closer in form to letters drawn with chalk.[18]

Unicode included the most common blackboard bold letters among the "Letterlike Symbols" in version 1.0 (1991), inherited from the Xerox Character Code Standard. Later versions of Unicode extended this set to all uppercase and lowercase Latin letters and a variety of other symbols, among the "Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols".[19]

In professionally typeset books, publishers and authors have gradually adopted blackboard bold, and its use is now commonplace,[14] but some still use ordinary bold symbols. Some authors use blackboard bold letters on the blackboard or in manuscripts, but prefer an ordinary bold typeface in print; for example, Jean-Pierre Serre has used blackboard bold in lectures, but has consistently used ordinary bold for the same symbols in his published works.[20] The Chicago Manual of Style's recommendation has evolved over time: In 1993, for the 14th edition, it advised that "blackboard bold should be confined to the classroom" (13.14); In 2003, for the 15th edition, it stated that "open-faced (blackboard) symbols are reserved for familiar systems of numbers" (14.12). The international standard ISO 80000-2:2019 lists R as the symbol for the real numbers but notes "the symbols IR and are also used", and similarly for N, Z, Q, C, and P (prime numbers).[21]

Encoding

Blackboard bold variants; from top to bottom: "poor man's blackboard bold", AMSFonts mathbb based on Times, doublestroke package based on Computer Modern,[22] STIX Two inspired by Monotype Special Alphabets 4

TeX, the standard typesetting system for mathematical texts, does not contain direct support for blackboard bold symbols, but the American Mathematical Society distributes the AMSFonts collection, loaded from the amssymb package, which includes a blackboard bold typeface for uppercase Latin letters accessed using \mathbb (e.g. \mathbb{R} produces ).[23]

In Unicode, a few of the more common blackboard bold characters ( ) are encoded in the Basic Multilingual Plane (BMP) in the Letterlike Symbols (2100–214F) area, named DOUBLE-STRUCK CAPITAL C etc. The rest, however, are encoded outside the BMP, in Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols (1D400–1D7FF), specifically from 1D538–1D550 (uppercase, excluding those encoded in the BMP), 1D552–1D56B (lowercase), and 1D7D8–1D7E1 (digits). Blackboard bold Arabic letters are encoded in Arabic Mathematical Alphabetic Symbols (1EE00–1EEFF), specifically 1EEA1–1EEBB.

Usage

The following table shows all available Unicode blackboard bold characters.[24]

The first column shows the letter as typically rendered by the LaTeX markup system. The second column shows the Unicode code point. The third column shows the Unicode symbol itself (which will only display correctly on browsers that support Unicode and have access to a suitable typeface). The fourth column describes some typical usage in mathematical texts.[25] Some of the symbols (particularly ,, and ) are nearly universal in their interpretation,[14] while others are more varied in use.

LaTeX Unicode code point (hex) Unicode symbol Mathematics usage
Uppercase Latin
𝔸 U+1D538 Represents affine space, 𝔸n, or the ring of adeles. Occasionally represents the algebraic numbers,[26] the algebraic closure of (more commonly written or Q), or the algebraic integers, an important subring of the algebraic numbers.
𝔹 U+1D539 Sometimes represents a ball, a boolean domain, or the Brauer group of a field.
U+2102 Represents the set of complex numbers.[14]
𝔻 U+1D53B Represents the unit disk in the complex plane, for example as the conformal disk model of the hyperbolic plane. By generalisation 𝔻n may mean the n-dimensional ball. Occasionally 𝔻 may mean the decimal fractions (see number), split-complex numbers, or domain of discourse.
𝔼 U+1D53C Represents the expected value of a random variable, or Euclidean space, or a field in a tower of fields, or the Eudoxus reals.
𝔽 U+1D53D Represents a field.[26] Often used for finite fields, with a subscript to indicate the order.[26] Also represents a Hirzebruch surface or a free group, with a subscript to indicate the number of generators (or generating set, if infinite).
𝔾 U+1D53E Represents a Grassmannian or a group, especially an algebraic group.
U+210D Represents the quaternions (the H stands for Hamilton),[26] or the upper half-plane, or hyperbolic space,[26] or hyperhomology of a complex.
𝕀 U+1D540 The closed unit interval or the ideal of polynomials vanishing on a subset. Occasionally the identity mapping on an algebraic structure, or an indicator function. The set of purely imaginary numbers (i.e., the set of all real multiples of the imaginary unit).
𝕁 U+1D541 Sometimes represents the irrational numbers, .
𝕂 U+1D542 Represents a field,[26] K standing for German Körper (literally, 'body'; cf. French corps meaning 'body' or algebraic 'field'). May also denote a compact space.
𝕃 U+1D543 Represents the Lefschetz motive. See Motive (algebraic geometry).
𝕄 U+1D544 Sometimes represents the monster group. The set of all m-by-n matrices is sometimes denoted 𝕄(m,n). In geometric algebra, represents the motor group of rigid motions. In functional programming and formal semantics, denotes the type constructor for a monad.
U+2115 Represents the set of natural numbers.[21] May or may not include zero.
𝕆 U+1D546 Represents the octonions.[26]
U+2119 Represents projective space, the probability of an event,[26] the prime numbers,[21] a power set, the positive reals, the irrational numbers, or a forcing poset.
U+211A Represents the set of rational numbers,[14] Q standing for quotient. With a prime number subscript p, represents the field of p-adic numbers.
U+211D Represents the set of real numbers.[14]
𝕊 U+1D54A Represents a sphere, or the sphere spectrum, or occasionally the sedenions.
𝕋 U+1D54B Represents the circle group, particularly the unit circle in the complex plane (and 𝕋n the n-dimensional torus). Occasionally the trigintaduonions, or a Hecke algebra (Hecke denoted his operators as Tn or 𝕋n), or the tropical semiring, or twistor space.
𝕌 U+1D54C
𝕍 U+1D54D Represents a vector space or an affine variety generated by a set of polynomials, or variance of a random variable.
𝕎 U+1D54E Represents the whole numbers (here in the sense of non-negative integers), which also are represented by 0.
𝕏 U+1D54F Occasionally used to denote an arbitrary metric space.
𝕐 U+1D550
U+2124 Represents the set of integers,[14] Z standing for German Zahlen (number). With a positive integer subscript n, it can mean the ring of modular arithmetic modulo n, or its additive cyclic group of order n; or with a prime subscript p, it can mean the ring of p-adic integers.
Lowercase Latin
[lower-alpha 1] U+1D552
U+1D553
U+1D554
U+1D555
U+1D556
U+1D557
U+1D558
U+1D559
U+1D55A
U+1D55B
𝕜 U+1D55C Represents a field.
[lower-alpha 1] U+1D55D
U+1D55E
U+1D55F
U+1D560
U+1D561
U+1D562
U+1D563
U+1D564
U+1D565
U+1D566
U+1D567
U+1D568
U+1D569
U+1D56A
U+1D56B
Italic Latin
[lower-alpha 1] U+2145
U+2146
U+2147
U+2148
U+2149
Greek
[lower-alpha 1] U+213E
U+213D
U+213F
U+213C
U+2140
Digits
[lower-alpha 1] U+1D7D8 In algebra of logical propositions, it represents a contradiction or falsity.
U+1D7D9 In set theory, the top element of a forcing poset, or occasionally the identity matrix in a matrix ring. Also used for the indicator function and the unit step function, and for the identity operator or identity matrix. In geometric algebra, represents the unit antiscalar, the identity element under the geometric antiproduct. In algebra of logical propositions, it represents a tautology.
U+1D7DA In category theory, the interval category.
U+1D7DB
U+1D7DC
U+1D7DD
U+1D7DE
U+1D7DF
U+1D7E0
U+1D7E1
Arabic
[lower-alpha 1] U+1EEA1
U+1EEA2
U+1EEA3
U+1EEA5
U+1EEA6
U+1EEA7
U+1EEA8
U+1EEA9
U+1EEAB
U+1EEAC
U+1EEAD
U+1EEAE
U+1EEAF
U+1EEB0
U+1EEB1
U+1EEB2
U+1EEB3
U+1EEB4
U+1EEB5
U+1EEB6
U+1EEB7
U+1EEB8
U+1EEB9
U+1EEBA
U+1EEBB

In addition, a blackboard-bold μn (not found in Unicode or amsmath LaTeX) is sometimes used by number theorists and algebraic geometers to designate the group scheme of n-th roots of unity.[27]

See also

  • Latin letters used in mathematics, science, and engineering
  • Mathematical alphanumeric symbols
  • Set notation

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 LaTeX renderings on this table are only available for uppercase Roman letters because Wikipedia's implementation uses the AMSFonts blackboard bold typeface, which does not support other characters, and because LaTeX blackboard bold currently does not work with numerals due a MediaWiki rendering bug.

References

  1. Gilreath, Charles T. (1993). "Graphic cueing of text: The typographic and diagraphic dimensions". Visible Language 27 (3): 336–361. https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/vl/article/view/5585. 
  2. Rosendorf, Theodore (2009). The Typographic Desk Reference. Oak Knoll Press. pp. 89–90. ISBN 978-1-58456-231-3. https://archive.org/details/typographicdeskr0000rose/page/89/mode/1up. 
  3. Bringhurst, Robert (1992). "Glossary of Typographic Terms". Elements of Typographic Style. Hartley & Marks. p. 234. ISBN 0-88179-033-8. https://archive.org/details/elementsoftypogr0000brin_z4a6/page/234/mode/1up. "Inline: A letter in which the inner portions of the main strokes have been carved away, leaving the edges more or less intact. Inline faces lighten the color while preserving the shapes and proportions of the original face." 
    Hutchings, R.S. (1965). "Inlines and Outlines". A Manual of Decorated Typefaces. Hastings House. pp. 10–11. https://archive.org/details/manualofdecorate0000rshu/page/10/. 

    Consuegra, David (2004). American Type: Design & Designers. Allworth Press. "Handtooled typefaces", p. 280; "Inline typefaces", p. 282; "Open face typefaces", p. 286–287. ISBN 978-1-58115-320-0. https://archive.org/details/americantypedesi0000cons/. 

  4. Gunning, Robert C. (1966). Lectures on Riemann Surfaces. Mathematical Notes. Princeton University Press. p. 1. https://archive.org/details/lecturesonrieman0000unse/page/1/mode/1up. 
  5. Narasimhan, Raghavan (1966). Introduction to the Theory of Analytic Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 25. Springer. p. 9. doi:10.1007/bfb0077071. ISBN 978-3-540-03608-1. 
  6. Hodgman, Charles D.; Selby, Samuel M.; Weast, Robert C., eds (1959). C.R.C. Standard Mathematical Tables (12th ed.). Chemical Rubber Publishing Company. p. 494. https://archive.org/details/crcstandardmathe12edunse/page/494/mode/1up. 
    Chaundy, Theodore W.; Barrett, P.R.; Batey, Charles (1954). The Printing of Mathematics. Oxford University Press. p. 52. https://archive.org/details/printingofmathem0000chau/page/52/. "The sign for bold type is a wavy line beneath the words or symbols in question; for security the word 'bold' may be added in the margin." 
  7. Karch, R. Randolph (1970). Graphic Arts Procedures. American Technical Society. p. 199. https://archive.org/details/graphicartsproce0000unse/page/199/mode/1up. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Webb, Stephen (2018). "Set of Natural Numbers ℕ". Clash Of Symbols: A Ride Through The Riches Of Glyphs. Springer. pp. 198–199, 233. https://archive.org/details/webb-stephen-clash-of-symbols-a-ride-through-the-riches-of-glyphs/page/198/mode/1up. 
  9. An example of double-struck type produced by an impact printer of the early 1980s can be found in:
    Waite, Mitchell; Arca, Julie (1982). Word Processing Primer. BYTE/McGraw-Hill. pp. 76–77. ISBN 978-0-07-067761-6. https://archive.org/details/wordprocessingpr0000wait/page/76/mode/1up. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Rudolph, Lee (2003-10-06). "Re: History of blackboard bold?". Newsgroupcompt.text.tex. Archived from the original on 2021-09-23. Retrieved 2023-07-25.
    This usenet post (as mirrored by The Math Forum) seems to have been one of the sources for Webb 2018; see p. 233
  11. 11.0 11.1 Loomis, Lynn Harold; Sternberg, Shlomo (1968). Advanced Calculus. Addison Wesley. p. 241.  The later revised edition is available from Sternberg's website.
  12. Gunning, Robert C.; Rossi, Hugo (1965). Analytic functions of several complex variables. Prentice-Hall. 
  13. A guide for Wiley-Interscience and Ronald Press Authors in the Preparation and Production of Manuscript and Illustrations (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. 1979. ISBN 978-0-471-03864-1. https://archive.org/details/guideforwileyint0000john/page/67/mode/1up. 
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 14.7 Krantz, S. (2001). "2.8 Technical Issues". Handbook of Typography for the Mathematical Sciences. Chapman & Hall/CRC. p. 35. ISBN 9781584881490. 
  15. Knuth, Donald (1984). The TeXbook. Addison-Wesley. p. 460. ISBN 978-0-201-13448-3. https://archive.org/details/texbook00dona/page/460/mode/1up. 
  16. Messer, Robert (1988). "Blackboard Bold". TUGboat 9 (1): 19–20. https://www.tug.org/TUGboat/tb09-1/tb20messer.pdf. 
  17. Beeton, Barbara (1985). "Mathematical Symbols and Cyrillic Fonts Ready for Distribution". TUGboat 6 (2): 59–63. https://tug.org/TUGboat/tb06-2/tb12beet.pdf. 
    Spivak, Michael (1986). The Joy of TeX: A Gourmet Guide to Typesetting with the AMS-TeX Macro Package. American Mathematical Society. p. 260. ISBN 978-0-8218-2999-8. https://archive.org/details/joyoftexgourmetg0000spiv/page/260/mode/1up. 
    "Coming in January from the American Mathematical Society". TUGboat 10 (3): 365–366. 1989. https://tug.org/TUGboat/tb10-3/tb25ams.pdf. 
    Beeton, Barbara (2020-09-05). "Re: Who designed the mathematical blackboard bold letters of AMS, and when?". https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/561430. "The [1985] blackboard bold letters [...] are blocky in appearance, somewhat similar to those in the Monotype blackboard bold, but of much lower quality. (It's no surprise that Knuth did not like them.)" 
  18. Vieth, Ulrik (2012). "OpenType math font development: Progress and challenges". TUGboat 33 (3): 302–308. https://www.tug.org/TUGboat/tb33-3/tb105vieth.pdf. "Design choices of Blackboard Bold alphabets again fall into multiple groups. One group favors a serif design which is derived from the main serif font: [...] Another group favor a sans-serif design which may be unrelated to the main sans-serif font: [...] Finally, the designs of individual letters can vary significantly among different math fonts, and are an additional consideration in font choice. For example, some users may have fairly strong preferences regarding such details as to whether the stem or the diagonal of the letter 'N' is double-struck.". 
  19. Aliprand, Joan; Allen, Julie; Becker, Joe et al., eds (2003). "Math Alphanumeric Symbols: U+1D400–U+1D7FF". The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0. Addison-Wesley. pp. 354–357. ISBN 978-0-321-18578-5. https://archive.org/details/unicodestandard0000unse_p4z3/page/354/. 
  20. Example Serre lecture: "Writing Mathematics Badly" video talk (part 3/3), starting at 7′08″
    Example Serre book: Serre, Jean-Pierre (1994). Cohomologie galoisienne. Springer. 
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 "7. Standard number sets and intervals". ISO 80000-2 Quantities and Units: Mathematics (2nd ed.). International Organization for Standardization. August 2019. Table 3, No. 2-7.4. https://www.iso.org/standard/64973.html. 
  22. Kummer, Olaf (2006). "doublestroke – Typeset mathematical double stroke symbols". https://www.ctan.org/pkg/doublestroke. 
  23. Pakin, Scott (25 June 2020). The Comprehensive LATEX Symbol List. https://mirror-hk.koddos.net/CTAN/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-a4.pdf. 
  24. Carlisle, David; Ion, Patrick (2023). "Double Struck (Open Face, Blackboard Bold)". XML Entity Definitions for Characters (Technical report) (3rd ed.). World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved 2023-07-27. Note: Characters highlighted [in yellow] are in the Plane 0 [Basic Multilingual Plane], not in the Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols block in Plane 1.
  25. Weisstein, Eric W.. "Doublestruck" (in en). https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Doublestruck.html. 
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 26.5 26.6 26.7 Sevryuk, Mikhail B. (1998-12-02). "Writing on a computer: some discouraging experiences.". https://www.pdmi.ras.ru/~arnsem/papers/. 
  27. Milne, James S. (1980). Étale cohomology. Princeton University Press. pp. xiii, 66. 

Template:MathematicalSymbolsNotationLanguage