Metrizable topological vector space

From HandWiki
Short description: Topological vector space whose topology can be defined by a metric

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, a metrizable (resp. pseudometrizable) topological vector space (TVS) is a TVS whose topology is induced by a metric (resp. pseudometric). An LM-space is an inductive limit of a sequence of locally convex metrizable TVS.

Pseudometrics and metrics

A pseudometric on a set X is a map d:X×X→ℝ satisfying the following properties:

  1. d(x,x)=0 for all x∈X;
  2. Symmetry: d(x,y)=d(y,x) for all x,y∈X;
  3. Subadditivity: d(x,z)≤d(x,y)+d(y,z) for all x,y,z∈X.

A pseudometric is called a metric if it satisfies:

  1. Identity of indiscernibles: for all x,y∈X, if d(x,y)=0 then x=y.

Ultrapseudometric

A pseudometric d on X is called a ultrapseudometric or a strong pseudometric if it satisfies:

  1. Strong/Ultrametric triangle inequality: d(x,z)≤max⁡{d(x,y),d(y,z)} for all x,y,z∈X.

Pseudometric space

A pseudometric space is a pair (X,d) consisting of a set X and a pseudometric d on X such that X's topology is identical to the topology on X induced by d. We call a pseudometric space (X,d) a metric space (resp. ultrapseudometric space) when d is a metric (resp. ultrapseudometric).

Topology induced by a pseudometric

If d is a pseudometric on a set X then collection of open balls: Br(z):={x∈X:d(x,z)<r} as z ranges over X and r>0 ranges over the positive real numbers, forms a basis for a topology on X that is called the d-topology or the pseudometric topology on X induced by d.

Convention: If (X,d) is a pseudometric space and X is treated as a topological space, then unless indicated otherwise, it should be assumed that X is endowed with the topology induced by d.

Pseudometrizable space

A topological space (X,τ) is called pseudometrizable (resp. metrizable, ultrapseudometrizable) if there exists a pseudometric (resp. metric, ultrapseudometric) d on X such that τ is equal to the topology induced by d.[1]

Pseudometrics and values on topological groups

An additive topological group is an additive group endowed with a topology, called a group topology, under which addition and negation become continuous operators.

A topology τ on a real or complex vector space X is called a vector topology or a TVS topology if it makes the operations of vector addition and scalar multiplication continuous (that is, if it makes X into a topological vector space).

Every topological vector space (TVS) X is an additive commutative topological group but not all group topologies on X are vector topologies. This is because despite it making addition and negation continuous, a group topology on a vector space X may fail to make scalar multiplication continuous. For instance, the discrete topology on any non-trivial vector space makes addition and negation continuous but do not make scalar multiplication continuous.

Translation invariant pseudometrics

If X is an additive group then we say that a pseudometric d on X is translation invariant or just invariant if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:

  1. Translation invariance: d(x+z,y+z)=d(x,y) for all x,y,z∈X;
  2. d(x,y)=d(x−y,0) for all x,y∈X.

Value/G-seminorm

If X is a topological group the a value or G-seminorm on X (the G stands for Group) is a real-valued map p:X→ℝ with the following properties:[2]

  1. Non-negative: p≥0.
  2. Subadditive: p(x+y)≤p(x)+p(y) for all x,y∈X;
  3. p(0)=0..
  4. Symmetric: p(−x)=p(x) for all x∈X.

where we call a G-seminorm a G-norm if it satisfies the additional condition:

  1. Total/Positive definite: If p(x)=0 then x=0.

Properties of values

If p is a value on a vector space X then:

  • |p(x)−p(y)|≤p(x−y) for all x,y∈X.[3]
  • p(nx)≤np(x) and 1np(x)≤p(x/n) for all x∈X and positive integers n.[4]
  • The set {x∈X:p(x)=0} is an additive subgroup of X.[3]

Equivalence on topological groups

Theorem[2] — Suppose that X is an additive commutative group. If d is a translation invariant pseudometric on X then the map p(x):=d(x,0) is a value on X called the value associated with d, and moreover, d generates a group topology on X (i.e. the d-topology on X makes X into a topological group). Conversely, if p is a value on X then the map d(x,y):=p(x−y) is a translation-invariant pseudometric on X and the value associated with d is just p.

Pseudometrizable topological groups

Theorem[2] — If (X,τ) is an additive commutative topological group then the following are equivalent:

  1. τ is induced by a pseudometric; (i.e. (X,τ) is pseudometrizable);
  2. τ is induced by a translation-invariant pseudometric;
  3. the identity element in (X,τ) has a countable neighborhood basis.

If (X,τ) is Hausdorff then the word "pseudometric" in the above statement may be replaced by the word "metric." A commutative topological group is metrizable if and only if it is Hausdorff and pseudometrizable.

An invariant pseudometric that doesn't induce a vector topology

Let X be a non-trivial (i.e. X≠{0}) real or complex vector space and let d be the translation-invariant trivial metric on X defined by d(x,x)=0 and d(x,y)=1 for all x,y∈X such that x≠y. The topology τ that d induces on X is the discrete topology, which makes (X,τ) into a commutative topological group under addition but does not form a vector topology on X because (X,τ) is disconnected but every vector topology is connected. What fails is that scalar multiplication isn't continuous on (X,τ).

This example shows that a translation-invariant (pseudo)metric is not enough to guarantee a vector topology, which leads us to define paranorms and F-seminorms.

Additive sequences

A collection 𝒩 of subsets of a vector space is called additive[5] if for every N∈𝒩, there exists some U∈𝒩 such that U+U⊆N.

Continuity of addition at 0 — If (X,+) is a group (as all vector spaces are), τ is a topology on X, and X×X is endowed with the product topology, then the addition map X×X→X (i.e. the map (x,y)↦x+y) is continuous at the origin of X×X if and only if the set of neighborhoods of the origin in (X,τ) is additive. This statement remains true if the word "neighborhood" is replaced by "open neighborhood."[5]

All of the above conditions are consequently a necessary for a topology to form a vector topology. Additive sequences of sets have the particularly nice property that they define non-negative continuous real-valued subadditive functions. These functions can then be used to prove many of the basic properties of topological vector spaces and also show that a Hausdorff TVS with a countable basis of neighborhoods is metrizable. The following theorem is true more generally for commutative additive topological groups.

Theorem — Let U∙=(Ui)i=0∞ be a collection of subsets of a vector space such that 0∈Ui and Ui+1+Ui+1⊆Ui for all i≥0. For all u∈U0, let 𝕊(u):={n∙=(n1,…,nk):k≥1,ni≥0 for all i, and u∈Un1+⋯+Unk}.

Define f:X→[0,1] by f(x)=1 if x∉U0 and otherwise let f(x):=inf{2−n1+⋯2−nk:n∙=(n1,…,nk)∈𝕊(x)}.

Then f is subadditive (meaning f(x+y)≤f(x)+f(y) for all x,y∈X) and f=0 on ⋂i≥0Ui, so in particular f(0)=0. If all Ui are symmetric sets then f(−x)=f(x) and if all Ui are balanced then f(sx)≤f(x) for all scalars s such that |s|≤1 and all x∈X. If X is a topological vector space and if all Ui are neighborhoods of the origin then f is continuous, where if in addition X is Hausdorff and U∙ forms a basis of balanced neighborhoods of the origin in X then d(x,y):=f(x−y) is a metric defining the vector topology on X.

Paranorms

If X is a vector space over the real or complex numbers then a paranorm on X is a G-seminorm (defined above) p:X→ℝ on X that satisfies any of the following additional conditions, each of which begins with "for all sequences x∙=(xi)i=1∞ in X and all convergent sequences of scalars s∙=(si)i=1∞":[6]

  1. Continuity of multiplication: if s is a scalar and x∈X are such that p(xi−x)→0 and s∙→s, then p(sixi−sx)→0.
  2. Both of the conditions:
    • if s∙→0 and if x∈X is such that p(xi−x)→0 then p(sixi)→0;
    • if p(x∙)→0 then p(sxi)→0 for every scalar s.
  3. Both of the conditions:
    • if p(x∙)→0 and s∙→s for some scalar s then p(sixi)→0;
    • if s∙→0 then p(six)→0 for all x∈X.
  4. Separate continuity:[7]
    • if s∙→s for some scalar s then p(sxi−sx)→0 for every x∈X;
    • if s is a scalar, x∈X, and p(xi−x)→0 then p(sxi−sx)→0 .

A paranorm is called total if in addition it satisfies:

  • Total/Positive definite: p(x)=0 implies x=0.

Properties of paranorms

If p is a paranorm on a vector space X then the map d:X×X→ℝ defined by d(x,y):=p(x−y) is a translation-invariant pseudometric on X that defines a vector topology on X.[8]

If p is a paranorm on a vector space X then:

  • the set {x∈X:p(x)=0} is a vector subspace of X.[8]
  • p(x+n)=p(x) for all x,n∈X with p(n)=0.[8]
  • If a paranorm p satisfies p(sx)≤|s|p(x) for all x∈X and scalars s, then p is absolutely homogeneity (i.e. equality holds)[8] and thus p is a seminorm.

Examples of paranorms

  • If d is a translation-invariant pseudometric on a vector space X that induces a vector topology τ on X (i.e. (X,τ) is a TVS) then the map p(x):=d(x−y,0) defines a continuous paranorm on (X,τ); moreover, the topology that this paranorm p defines in X is τ.[8]
  • If p is a paranorm on X then so is the map q(x):=p(x)/[1+p(x)].[8]
  • Every positive scalar multiple of a paranorm (resp. total paranorm) is again such a paranorm (resp. total paranorm).
  • Every seminorm is a paranorm.[8]
  • The restriction of an paranorm (resp. total paranorm) to a vector subspace is an paranorm (resp. total paranorm).[9]
  • The sum of two paranorms is a paranorm.[8]
  • If p and q are paranorms on X then so is (p∧q)(x):=inf{p(y)+q(z):x=y+z with y,z∈X}. Moreover, (p∧q)≤p and (p∧q)≤q. This makes the set of paranorms on X into a conditionally complete lattice.[8]
  • Each of the following real-valued maps are paranorms on X:=ℝ2:
    • (x,y)↦|x|
    • (x,y)↦|x|+|y|
  • The real-valued maps (x,y)↦|x2−y2| and (x,y)↦|x2−y2|3/2 are not paranorms on X:=ℝ2.[8]
  • If x∙=(xi)i∈I is a Hamel basis on a vector space X then the real-valued map that sends x=∑i∈Isixi∈X (where all but finitely many of the scalars si are 0) to ∑i∈I|si| is a paranorm on X, which satisfies p(sx)=|s|p(x) for all x∈X and scalars s.[8]
  • The function p(x):=|sin⁡(πx)|+min⁡{2,|x|} is a paranorm on ℝ that is not balanced but nevertheless equivalent to the usual norm on R. Note that the function x↦|sin⁡(πx)| is subadditive.[10]
  • Let Xℂ be a complex vector space and let Xℝ denote Xℂ considered as a vector space over ℝ. Any paranorm on Xℂ is also a paranorm on Xℝ.[9]

F-seminorms

If X is a vector space over the real or complex numbers then an F-seminorm on X (the F stands for Fréchet) is a real-valued map p:X→ℝ with the following four properties: [11]

  1. Non-negative: p≥0.
  2. Subadditive: p(x+y)≤p(x)+p(y) for all x,y∈X
  3. Balanced: p(ax)≤p(x) for x∈X all scalars a satisfying |a|≤1;
    • This condition guarantees that each set of the form {z∈X:p(z)≤r} or {z∈X:p(z)<r} for some r≥0 is a balanced set.
  4. For every x∈X, p(1nx)→0 as n→∞
    • The sequence (1n)n=1∞ can be replaced by any positive sequence converging to the zero.[12]

An F-seminorm is called an F-norm if in addition it satisfies:

  1. Total/Positive definite: p(x)=0 implies x=0.

An F-seminorm is called monotone if it satisfies:

  1. Monotone: p(rx)<p(sx) for all non-zero x∈X and all real s and t such that s<t.[12]

F-seminormed spaces

An F-seminormed space (resp. F-normed space)[12] is a pair (X,p) consisting of a vector space X and an F-seminorm (resp. F-norm) p on X.

If (X,p) and (Z,q) are F-seminormed spaces then a map f:X→Z is called an isometric embedding[12] if q(f(x)−f(y))=p(x,y) for all x,y∈X.

Every isometric embedding of one F-seminormed space into another is a topological embedding, but the converse is not true in general.[12]

Examples of F-seminorms

  • Every positive scalar multiple of an F-seminorm (resp. F-norm, seminorm) is again an F-seminorm (resp. F-norm, seminorm).
  • The sum of finitely many F-seminorms (resp. F-norms) is an F-seminorm (resp. F-norm).
  • If p and q are F-seminorms on X then so is their pointwise supremum x↦sup⁡{p(x),q(x)}. The same is true of the supremum of any non-empty finite family of F-seminorms on X.[12]
  • The restriction of an F-seminorm (resp. F-norm) to a vector subspace is an F-seminorm (resp. F-norm).[9]
  • A non-negative real-valued function on X is a seminorm if and only if it is a convex F-seminorm, or equivalently, if and only if it is a convex balanced G-seminorm.[10] In particular, every seminorm is an F-seminorm.
  • For any 0<p<1, the map f on ℝn defined by [f(x1,…,xn)]p=|x1|p+⋯|xn|p is an F-norm that is not a norm.
  • If L:X→Y is a linear map and if q is an F-seminorm on Y, then q∘L is an F-seminorm on X.[12]
  • Let Xℂ be a complex vector space and let Xℝ denote Xℂ considered as a vector space over ℝ. Any F-seminorm on Xℂ is also an F-seminorm on Xℝ.[9]

Properties of F-seminorms

Every F-seminorm is a paranorm and every paranorm is equivalent to some F-seminorm.[7] Every F-seminorm on a vector space X is a value on X. In particular, p(x)=0, and p(x)=p(−x) for all x∈X.

Topology induced by a single F-seminorm

Theorem[11] — Let p be an F-seminorm on a vector space X. Then the map d:X×X→ℝ defined by d(x,y):=p(x−y) is a translation invariant pseudometric on X that defines a vector topology τ on X. If p is an F-norm then d is a metric. When X is endowed with this topology then p is a continuous map on X.

The balanced sets {x∈X:p(x)≤r}, as r ranges over the positive reals, form a neighborhood basis at the origin for this topology consisting of closed set. Similarly, the balanced sets {x∈X:p(x)<r}, as r ranges over the positive reals, form a neighborhood basis at the origin for this topology consisting of open sets.

Topology induced by a family of F-seminorms

Suppose that ℒ is a non-empty collection of F-seminorms on a vector space X and for any finite subset ℱ⊆ℒ and any r>0, let Uℱ,r:=⋂p∈ℱ{x∈X:p(x)<r}.

The set {Uℱ,r:r>0,ℱ⊆ℒ,ℱ finite } forms a filter base on X that also forms a neighborhood basis at the origin for a vector topology on X denoted by τℒ.[12] Each Uℱ,r is a balanced and absorbing subset of X.[12] These sets satisfy[12] Uℱ,r/2+Uℱ,r/2⊆Uℱ,r.

  • τℒ is the coarsest vector topology on X making each p∈ℒ continuous.[12]
  • τℒ is Hausdorff if and only if for every non-zero x∈X, there exists some p∈ℒ such that p(x)>0.[12]
  • If ℱ is the set of all continuous F-seminorms on (X,τℒ) then τℒ=τℱ.[12]
  • If ℱ is the set of all pointwise suprema of non-empty finite subsets of ℱ of ℒ then ℱ is a directed family of F-seminorms and τℒ=τℱ.[12]

Fréchet combination

Suppose that p∙=(pi)i=1∞ is a family of non-negative subadditive functions on a vector space X.

The Fréchet combination[8] of p∙ is defined to be the real-valued map p(x):=∑i=1∞pi(x)2i[1+pi(x)].

As an F-seminorm

Assume that p∙=(pi)i=1∞ is an increasing sequence of seminorms on X and let p be the Fréchet combination of p∙. Then p is an F-seminorm on X that induces the same locally convex topology as the family p∙ of seminorms.[13]

Since p∙=(pi)i=1∞ is increasing, a basis of open neighborhoods of the origin consists of all sets of the form {x∈X:pi(x)<r} as i ranges over all positive integers and r>0 ranges over all positive real numbers.

The translation invariant pseudometric on X induced by this F-seminorm p is d(x,y)=∑i=1∞12ipi(x−y)1+pi(x−y).

This metric was discovered by Fréchet in his 1906 thesis for the spaces of real and complex sequences with pointwise operations.[14]

As a paranorm

If each pi is a paranorm then so is p and moreover, p induces the same topology on X as the family p∙ of paranorms.[8] This is also true of the following paranorms on X:

  • q(x):=inf{∑i=1npi(x)+1n:n>0 is an integer }.[8]
  • r(x):=∑n=1∞min⁡{12n,pn(x)}.[8]

Generalization

The Fréchet combination can be generalized by use of a bounded remetrization function.

A bounded remetrization function[15] is a continuous non-negative non-decreasing map R:[0,∞)→[0,∞) that has a bounded range, is subadditive (meaning that R(s+t)≤R(s)+R(t) for all s,t≥0), and satisfies R(s)=0 if and only if s=0.

Examples of bounded remetrization functions include arctan⁡t, tanh⁡t, t↦min⁡{t,1}, and t↦t1+t.[15] If d is a pseudometric (respectively, metric) on X and R is a bounded remetrization function then R∘d is a bounded pseudometric (respectively, bounded metric) on X that is uniformly equivalent to d.[15]

Suppose that p∙=(pi)i=1∞ is a family of non-negative F-seminorm on a vector space X, R is a bounded remetrization function, and r∙=(ri)i=1∞ is a sequence of positive real numbers whose sum is finite. Then p(x):=∑i=1∞riR(pi(x)) defines a bounded F-seminorm that is uniformly equivalent to the p∙.[16] It has the property that for any net x∙=(xa)a∈A in X, p(x∙)→0 if and only if pi(x∙)→0 for all i.[16] p is an F-norm if and only if the p∙ separate points on X.[16]

Characterizations

Of (pseudo)metrics induced by (semi)norms

A pseudometric (resp. metric) d is induced by a seminorm (resp. norm) on a vector space X if and only if d is translation invariant and absolutely homogeneous, which means that for all scalars s and all x,y∈X, in which case the function defined by p(x):=d(x,0) is a seminorm (resp. norm) and the pseudometric (resp. metric) induced by p is equal to d.

Of pseudometrizable TVS

If (X,τ) is a topological vector space (TVS) (where note in particular that τ is assumed to be a vector topology) then the following are equivalent:[11]

  1. X is pseudometrizable (i.e. the vector topology τ is induced by a pseudometric on X).
  2. X has a countable neighborhood base at the origin.
  3. The topology on X is induced by a translation-invariant pseudometric on X.
  4. The topology on X is induced by an F-seminorm.
  5. The topology on X is induced by a paranorm.

Of metrizable TVS

If (X,τ) is a TVS then the following are equivalent:

  1. X is metrizable.
  2. X is Hausdorff and pseudometrizable.
  3. X is Hausdorff and has a countable neighborhood base at the origin.[11][12]
  4. The topology on X is induced by a translation-invariant metric on X.[11]
  5. The topology on X is induced by an F-norm.[11][12]
  6. The topology on X is induced by a monotone F-norm.[12]
  7. The topology on X is induced by a total paranorm.

Birkhoff–Kakutani theorem — If (X,τ) is a topological vector space then the following three conditions are equivalent:[17][note 1]

  1. The origin {0} is closed in X, and there is a countable basis of neighborhoods for 0 in X.
  2. (X,τ) is metrizable (as a topological space).
  3. There is a translation-invariant metric on X that induces on X the topology τ, which is the given topology on X.

By the Birkhoff–Kakutani theorem, it follows that there is an equivalent metric that is translation-invariant.

Of locally convex pseudometrizable TVS

If (X,τ) is TVS then the following are equivalent:[13]

  1. X is locally convex and pseudometrizable.
  2. X has a countable neighborhood base at the origin consisting of convex sets.
  3. The topology of X is induced by a countable family of (continuous) seminorms.
  4. The topology of X is induced by a countable increasing sequence of (continuous) seminorms (pi)i=1∞ (increasing means that for all i, pi≥pi+1.
  5. The topology of X is induced by an F-seminorm of the form: p(x)=∑n=1∞2−narctan⁡pn(x) where (pi)i=1∞ are (continuous) seminorms on X.[18]

Quotients

Let M be a vector subspace of a topological vector space (X,τ).

  • If X is a pseudometrizable TVS then so is X/M.[11]
  • If X is a complete pseudometrizable TVS and M is a closed vector subspace of X then X/M is complete.[11]
  • If X is metrizable TVS and M is a closed vector subspace of X then X/M is metrizable.[11]
  • If p is an F-seminorm on X, then the map P:X/M→ℝ defined by P(x+M):=inf{p(x+m):m∈M} is an F-seminorm on X/M that induces the usual quotient topology on X/M.[11] If in addition p is an F-norm on X and if M is a closed vector subspace of X then P is an F-norm on X.[11]

Examples and sufficient conditions

  • Every seminormed space (X,p) is pseudometrizable with a canonical pseudometric given by d(x,y):=p(x−y) for all x,y∈X.[19].
  • If (X,d) is pseudometric TVS with a translation invariant pseudometric d, then p(x):=d(x,0) defines a paranorm.[20] However, if d is a translation invariant pseudometric on the vector space X (without the addition condition that (X,d) is pseudometric TVS), then d need not be either an F-seminorm[21] nor a paranorm.
  • If a TVS has a bounded neighborhood of the origin then it is pseudometrizable; the converse is in general false.[14]
  • If a Hausdorff TVS has a bounded neighborhood of the origin then it is metrizable.[14]
  • Suppose X is either a DF-space or an LM-space. If X is a sequential space then it is either metrizable or else a Montel DF-space.

If X is Hausdorff locally convex TVS then X with the strong topology, (X,b(X,X′)), is metrizable if and only if there exists a countable set ℬ of bounded subsets of X such that every bounded subset of X is contained in some element of ℬ.[22]

The strong dual space Xb′ of a metrizable locally convex space (such as a Fréchet space[23]) X is a DF-space.[24] The strong dual of a DF-space is a Fréchet space.[25] The strong dual of a reflexive Fréchet space is a bornological space.[24] The strong bidual (that is, the strong dual space of the strong dual space) of a metrizable locally convex space is a Fréchet space.[26] If X is a metrizable locally convex space then its strong dual Xb′ has one of the following properties, if and only if it has all of these properties: (1) bornological, (2) infrabarreled, (3) barreled.[26]

Normability

A topological vector space is seminormable if and only if it has a convex bounded neighborhood of the origin. Moreover, a TVS is normable if and only if it is Hausdorff and seminormable.[14] Every metrizable TVS on a finite-dimensional vector space is a normable locally convex complete TVS, being TVS-isomorphic to Euclidean space. Consequently, any metrizable TVS that is not normable must be infinite dimensional.

If M is a metrizable locally convex TVS that possess a countable fundamental system of bounded sets, then M is normable.[27]

If X is a Hausdorff locally convex space then the following are equivalent:

  1. X is normable.
  2. X has a (von Neumann) bounded neighborhood of the origin.
  3. the strong dual space Xb′ of X is normable.[28]

and if this locally convex space X is also metrizable, then the following may be appended to this list:

  1. the strong dual space of X is metrizable.[28]
  2. the strong dual space of X is a Fréchet–Urysohn locally convex space.[23]

In particular, if a metrizable locally convex space X (such as a Fréchet space) is not normable then its strong dual space Xb′ is not a Fréchet–Urysohn space and consequently, this complete Hausdorff locally convex space Xb′ is also neither metrizable nor normable.

Another consequence of this is that if X is a reflexive locally convex TVS whose strong dual Xb′ is metrizable then Xb′ is necessarily a reflexive Fréchet space, X is a DF-space, both X and Xb′ are necessarily complete Hausdorff ultrabornological distinguished webbed spaces, and moreover, Xb′ is normable if and only if X is normable if and only if X is Fréchet–Urysohn if and only if X is metrizable. In particular, such a space X is either a Banach space or else it is not even a Fréchet–Urysohn space.

Metrically bounded sets and bounded sets

Suppose that (X,d) is a pseudometric space and B⊆X. The set B is metrically bounded or d-bounded if there exists a real number R>0 such that d(x,y)≤R for all x,y∈B; the smallest such R is then called the diameter or d-diameter of B.[14] If B is bounded in a pseudometrizable TVS X then it is metrically bounded; the converse is in general false but it is true for locally convex metrizable TVSs.[14]

Properties of pseudometrizable TVS

Theorem[29] — All infinite-dimensional separable complete metrizable TVS are homeomorphic.

  • Every metrizable locally convex TVS is a quasibarrelled space,[30] bornological space, and a Mackey space.
  • Every complete pseudometrizable TVS is a barrelled space and a Baire space (and hence non-meager).[31] However, there exist metrizable Baire spaces that are not complete.[31]
  • If X is a metrizable locally convex space, then the strong dual of X is bornological if and only if it is barreled, if and only if it is infrabarreled.[26]
  • If X is a complete pseudometrizable TVS and M is a closed vector subspace of X, then X/M is complete.[11]
  • The strong dual of a locally convex metrizable TVS is a webbed space.[32]
  • If (X,τ) and (X,ν) are complete metrizable TVSs (i.e. F-spaces) and if ν is coarser than τ then τ=ν;[33] this is no longer guaranteed to be true if any one of these metrizable TVSs is not complete.[34] Said differently, if (X,τ) and (X,ν) are both F-spaces but with different topologies, then neither one of τ and ν contains the other as a subset. One particular consequence of this is, for example, that if (X,p) is a Banach space and (X,q) is some other normed space whose norm-induced topology is finer than (or alternatively, is coarser than) that of (X,p) (i.e. if p≤Cq or if q≤Cp for some constant C>0), then the only way that (X,q) can be a Banach space (i.e. also be complete) is if these two norms p and q are equivalent; if they are not equivalent, then (X,q) can not be a Banach space. As another consequence, if (X,p) is a Banach space and (X,ν) is a Fréchet space, then the map p:(X,ν)→ℝ is continuous if and only if the Fréchet space (X,ν) is the TVS (X,p) (here, the Banach space (X,p) is being considered as a TVS, which means that its norm is "forgetten" but its topology is remembered).
  • A metrizable locally convex space is normable if and only if its strong dual space is a Fréchet–Urysohn locally convex space.[23]
  • Any product of complete metrizable TVSs is a Baire space.[31]
  • A product of metrizable TVSs is metrizable if and only if it all but at most countably many of these TVSs have dimension 0.[35]
  • A product of pseudometrizable TVSs is pseudometrizable if and only if it all but at most countably many of these TVSs have the trivial topology.
  • Every complete pseudometrizable TVS is a barrelled space and a Baire space (and thus non-meager).[31]
  • The dimension of a complete metrizable TVS is either finite or uncountable.[35]

Completeness

Every topological vector space (and more generally, a topological group) has a canonical uniform structure, induced by its topology, which allows the notions of completeness and uniform continuity to be applied to it. If X is a metrizable TVS and d is a metric that defines X's topology, then its possible that X is complete as a TVS (i.e. relative to its uniformity) but the metric d is not a complete metric (such metrics exist even for X=ℝ). Thus, if X is a TVS whose topology is induced by a pseudometric d, then the notion of completeness of X (as a TVS) and the notion of completeness of the pseudometric space (X,d) are not always equivalent. The next theorem gives a condition for when they are equivalent:

Theorem — If X is a pseudometrizable TVS whose topology is induced by a translation invariant pseudometric d, then d is a complete pseudometric on X if and only if X is complete as a TVS.[36]

Theorem[37][38] (Klee) — Let d be any[note 2] metric on a vector space X such that the topology τ induced by d on X makes (X,τ) into a topological vector space. If (X,d) is a complete metric space then (X,τ) is a complete-TVS.

Theorem — If X is a TVS whose topology is induced by a paranorm p, then X is complete if and only if for every sequence (xi)i=1∞ in X, if ∑i=1∞p(xi)<∞ then ∑i=1∞xi converges in X.[39]

If M is a closed vector subspace of a complete pseudometrizable TVS X, then the quotient space X/M is complete.[40] If M is a complete vector subspace of a metrizable TVS X and if the quotient space X/M is complete then so is X.[40] If X is not complete then M:=X, but not complete, vector subspace of X.

A Baire separable topological group is metrizable if and only if it is cosmic.[23]

Subsets and subsequences

  • Let M be a separable locally convex metrizable topological vector space and let C be its completion. If S is a bounded subset of C then there exists a bounded subset R of X such that S⊆clCR.[41]
  • Every totally bounded subset of a locally convex metrizable TVS X is contained in the closed convex balanced hull of some sequence in X that converges to 0.
  • In a pseudometrizable TVS, every bornivore is a neighborhood of the origin.[42]
  • If d is a translation invariant metric on a vector space X, then d(nx,0)≤nd(x,0) for all x∈X and every positive integer n.[43]
  • If (xi)i=1∞ is a null sequence (that is, it converges to the origin) in a metrizable TVS then there exists a sequence (ri)i=1∞ of positive real numbers diverging to ∞ such that (rixi)i=1∞→0.[43]
  • A subset of a complete metric space is closed if and only if it is complete. If a space X is not complete, then X is a closed subset of X that is not complete.
  • If X is a metrizable locally convex TVS then for every bounded subset B of X, there exists a bounded disk D in X such that B⊆XD, and both X and the auxiliary normed space XD induce the same subspace topology on B.[44]

Banach-Saks theorem[45] — If (xn)n=1∞ is a sequence in a locally convex metrizable TVS (X,τ) that converges weakly to some x∈X, then there exists a sequence y∙=(yi)i=1∞ in X such that y∙→x in (X,τ) and each yi is a convex combination of finitely many xn.

Mackey's countability condition[14] — Suppose that X is a locally convex metrizable TVS and that (Bi)i=1∞ is a countable sequence of bounded subsets of X. Then there exists a bounded subset B of X and a sequence (ri)i=1∞ of positive real numbers such that Bi⊆riB for all i.

Generalized series

As described in this article's section on generalized series, for any I-indexed family family (ri)i∈I of vectors from a TVS X, it is possible to define their sum ∑i∈Iri as the limit of the net of finite partial sums F∈FiniteSubsets⁡(I)↦∑i∈Fri where the domain FiniteSubsets⁡(I) is directed by ⊆. If I=ℕ and X=ℝ, for instance, then the generalized series ∑i∈ℕri converges if and only if ∑i=1∞ri converges unconditionally in the usual sense (which for real numbers, is equivalent to absolute convergence). If a generalized series ∑i∈Iri converges in a metrizable TVS, then the set {i∈I:ri≠0} is necessarily countable (that is, either finite or countably infinite);[proof 1] in other words, all but at most countably many ri will be zero and so this generalized series ∑i∈Iri=∑ri≠0i∈Iri is actually a sum of at most countably many non-zero terms.

Linear maps

If X is a pseudometrizable TVS and A maps bounded subsets of X to bounded subsets of Y, then A is continuous.[14] Discontinuous linear functionals exist on any infinite-dimensional pseudometrizable TVS.[46] Thus, a pseudometrizable TVS is finite-dimensional if and only if its continuous dual space is equal to its algebraic dual space.[46]

If F:X→Y is a linear map between TVSs and X is metrizable then the following are equivalent:

  1. F is continuous;
  2. F is a (locally) bounded map (that is, F maps (von Neumann) bounded subsets of X to bounded subsets of Y);[12]
  3. F is sequentially continuous;[12]
  4. the image under F of every null sequence in X is a bounded set[12] where by definition, a null sequence is a sequence that converges to the origin.
  5. F maps null sequences to null sequences;

Open and almost open maps

Theorem: If X is a complete pseudometrizable TVS, Y is a Hausdorff TVS, and T:X→Y is a closed and almost open linear surjection, then T is an open map.[47]
Theorem: If T:X→Y is a surjective linear operator from a locally convex space X onto a barrelled space Y (e.g. every complete pseudometrizable space is barrelled) then T is almost open.[47]
Theorem: If T:X→Y is a surjective linear operator from a TVS X onto a Baire space Y then T is almost open.[47]
Theorem: Suppose T:X→Y is a continuous linear operator from a complete pseudometrizable TVS X into a Hausdorff TVS Y. If the image of T is non-meager in Y then T:X→Y is a surjective open map and Y is a complete metrizable space.[47]

Hahn-Banach extension property

A vector subspace M of a TVS X has the extension property if any continuous linear functional on M can be extended to a continuous linear functional on X.[22] Say that a TVS X has the Hahn-Banach extension property (HBEP) if every vector subspace of X has the extension property.[22]

The Hahn-Banach theorem guarantees that every Hausdorff locally convex space has the HBEP. For complete metrizable TVSs there is a converse:

Theorem (Kalton) — Every complete metrizable TVS with the Hahn-Banach extension property is locally convex.[22]

If a vector space X has uncountable dimension and if we endow it with the finest vector topology then this is a TVS with the HBEP that is neither locally convex or metrizable.[22]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ In fact, this is true for topological group, for the proof doesn't use the scalar multiplications.
  2. ↑ Not assumed to be translation-invariant.

Proofs

  1. ↑ Suppose the net ∑i∈Iri=deflim⁡A∈FiniteSubsets⁡(I) ∑i∈Ari=lim⁡{∑i∈Ari:A⊆I,A finite } converges to some point in a metrizable TVS X, where recall that this net's domain is the directed set (FiniteSubsets⁡(I),⊆). Like every convergent net, this convergent net of partial sums A↦∑i∈Ari is a Cauchy net, which for this particular net means (by definition) that for every neighborhood W of the origin in X, there exists a finite subset A0 of I such that ∑i∈Bri−∑i∈Cri∈W for all finite supersets B,C⊇A0; this implies that ri∈W for every i∈I∖A0 (by taking B:=A0∪{i} and C:=A0). Since X is metrizable, it has a countable neighborhood basis U1,U2,… at the origin, whose intersection is necessarily U1∩U2∩⋯={0} (since X is a Hausdorff TVS). For every positive integer n∈ℕ, pick a finite subset An⊆I such that ri∈Un for every i∈I∖An. If i belongs to (I∖A1)∩(I∖A2)∩⋯=I∖(A1∪A2∪⋯) then ri belongs to U1∩U2∩⋯={0}. Thus ri=0 for every index i∈I that does not belong to the countable set A1∪A2∪⋯. ◼

References

  1. ↑ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 1–18.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 37–40.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Swartz 1992, p. 15.
  4. ↑ Wilansky 2013, p. 17.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Wilansky 2013, pp. 40–47.
  6. ↑ Wilansky 2013, p. 15.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Schechter 1996, pp. 689–691.
  8. ↑ 8.00 8.01 8.02 8.03 8.04 8.05 8.06 8.07 8.08 8.09 8.10 8.11 8.12 8.13 8.14 Wilansky 2013, pp. 15–18.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Schechter 1996, p. 692.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Schechter 1996, p. 691.
  11. ↑ 11.00 11.01 11.02 11.03 11.04 11.05 11.06 11.07 11.08 11.09 11.10 11.11 Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 91–95.
  12. ↑ 12.00 12.01 12.02 12.03 12.04 12.05 12.06 12.07 12.08 12.09 12.10 12.11 12.12 12.13 12.14 12.15 12.16 12.17 12.18 12.19 Jarchow 1981, pp. 38–42.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Narici & Beckenstein 2011, p. 123.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 14.7 Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 156–175.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 Schechter 1996, p. 487.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 Schechter 1996, pp. 692–693.
  17. ↑ Köthe 1983, section 15.11
  18. ↑ Schechter 1996, p. 706.
  19. ↑ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 115–154.
  20. ↑ Wilansky 2013, pp. 15–16.
  21. ↑ Schaefer & Wolff 1999, pp. 91–92.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 22.3 22.4 Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 225–273.
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 Gabriyelyan, S.S. "On topological spaces and topological groups with certain local countable networks (2014)
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 154.
  25. ↑ Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 196.
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 153.
  27. ↑ Schaefer & Wolff 1999, pp. 68–72.
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Trèves 2006, p. 201.
  29. ↑ Wilansky 2013, p. 57.
  30. ↑ Jarchow 1981, p. 222.
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 31.2 31.3 Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 371–423.
  32. ↑ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 459–483.
  33. ↑ Köthe 1969, p. 168.
  34. ↑ Wilansky 2013, p. 59.
  35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 Schaefer & Wolff 1999, pp. 12–35.
  36. ↑ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 47–50.
  37. ↑ Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 35.
  38. ↑ Klee, V. L. (1952). "Invariant metrics in groups (solution of a problem of Banach)". Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (3): 484–487. doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1952-0047250-4. https://www.ams.org/journals/proc/1952-003-03/S0002-9939-1952-0047250-4/S0002-9939-1952-0047250-4.pdf. 
  39. ↑ Wilansky 2013, pp. 56–57.
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 47–66.
  41. ↑ Schaefer & Wolff 1999, pp. 190–202.
  42. ↑ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 172–173.
  43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 Rudin 1991, p. 22.
  44. ↑ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 441–457.
  45. ↑ Rudin 1991, p. 67.
  46. ↑ 46.0 46.1 Narici & Beckenstein 2011, p. 125.
  47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 47.2 47.3 Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 466–468.

Bibliography

Template:Metric spaces