# Polar decomposition

__: Representation of invertible matrices as unitaries multiplying a Hermitian operator__

**Short description**In mathematics, the **polar decomposition** of a square real or complex matrix [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is a factorization of the form [math]\displaystyle{ A = U P }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] is a unitary matrix and [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] is a positive semi-definite Hermitian matrix, both square and of the same size.^{[1]}

Intuitively, if a real [math]\displaystyle{ n\times n }[/math] matrix [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is interpreted as a linear transformation of [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math]-dimensional space [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{R}^n }[/math], the polar decomposition separates it into a rotation or reflection [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{R}^n }[/math], and a scaling of the space along a set of [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] orthogonal axes.

The polar decomposition of a square matrix [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] always exists. If [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is invertible, the decomposition is unique, and the factor [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] will be positive-definite. In that case, [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] can be written uniquely in the form [math]\displaystyle{ A = U e^X }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] is unitary and [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] is the unique self-adjoint logarithm of the matrix [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math].^{[2]} This decomposition is useful in computing the fundamental group of (matrix) Lie groups.^{[3]}

The polar decomposition can also be defined as [math]\displaystyle{ A = P' U }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ P' = U P U^{-1} }[/math] is a symmetric positive-definite matrix with the same eigenvalues as [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] but different eigenvectors.

The polar decomposition of a matrix can be seen as the matrix analog of the polar form of a complex number [math]\displaystyle{ z }[/math] as [math]\displaystyle{ z = u r }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ r }[/math] is its absolute value (a non-negative real number), and [math]\displaystyle{ u }[/math] is a complex number with unit norm (an element of the circle group).

The definition [math]\displaystyle{ A = UP }[/math] may be extended to rectangular matrices [math]\displaystyle{ A\in\mathbb{C}^{m \times n} }[/math] by requiring [math]\displaystyle{ U\in\mathbb{C}^{m \times n} }[/math] to be a semi-unitary matrix and [math]\displaystyle{ P\in\mathbb{C}^{n \times n} }[/math] to be a positive-semidefinite Hermitian matrix. The decomposition always exists and [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] is always unique. The matrix [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] is unique if and only if [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] has full rank. ^{[4]}

## Intuitive interpretation

A real square [math]\displaystyle{ m\times m }[/math] matrix [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] can be interpreted as the linear transformation of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{R}^m }[/math] that takes a column vector [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] to [math]\displaystyle{ A x }[/math]. Then, in the polar decomposition [math]\displaystyle{ A = RP }[/math], the factor [math]\displaystyle{ R }[/math] is an [math]\displaystyle{ m\times m }[/math] real orthonormal matrix. The polar decomposition then can be seen as expressing the linear transformation defined by [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] into a scaling of the space [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{R}^m }[/math] along each eigenvector [math]\displaystyle{ e_i }[/math] of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] by a scale factor [math]\displaystyle{ \sigma_i }[/math] (the action of [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math]), followed by a single rotation or reflection of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{R}^m }[/math] (the action of [math]\displaystyle{ R }[/math]).

Alternatively, the decomposition [math]\displaystyle{ A=P R }[/math] expresses the transformation defined by [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] as a rotation ([math]\displaystyle{ R }[/math]) followed by a scaling ([math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math]) along certain orthogonal directions. The scale factors are the same, but the directions are different.

## Properties

The polar decomposition of the complex conjugate of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is given by [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{A} = \overline{U}\overline{P}. }[/math] Note that
[math]\displaystyle{ \det A = \det U \det P = e^{i\theta} r }[/math]
gives the corresponding polar decomposition of the determinant of *A*, since [math]\displaystyle{ \det U = e^{i\theta} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \det P = r = \left|\det A\right| }[/math]. In particular, if [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] has determinant 1 then both [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] have determinant 1.

The positive-semidefinite matrix *P* is always unique, even if *A* is singular, and is denoted as
[math]\displaystyle{ P = \left(A^* A\right)^\frac{1}{2}, }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ A^* }[/math] denotes the conjugate transpose of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math]. The uniqueness of *P* ensures that this expression is well-defined. The uniqueness is guaranteed by the fact that [math]\displaystyle{ A^* A }[/math] is a positive-semidefinite Hermitian matrix and, therefore, has a unique positive-semidefinite Hermitian square root.^{[5]} If *A* is invertible, then *P* is positive-definite, thus also invertible and the matrix *U* is uniquely determined by
[math]\displaystyle{ U = AP^{-1}. }[/math]

### Relation to the SVD

In terms of the singular value decomposition (SVD) of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ A = W\Sigma V^* }[/math], one has [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} P &= V\Sigma V^* \\ U &= WV^* \end{align} }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ W }[/math] are unitary matrices (called orthogonal matrices if the field is the reals [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{R} }[/math]). This confirms that [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] is positive-definite and [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] is unitary. Thus, the existence of the SVD is equivalent to the existence of polar decomposition.

One can also decompose [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] in the form [math]\displaystyle{ A = P'U }[/math]

Here [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] is the same as before and [math]\displaystyle{ P' }[/math] is given by [math]\displaystyle{ P' = UPU^{-1} = \left(AA^*\right)^\frac{1}{2} = W \Sigma W^*. }[/math]

This is known as the left polar decomposition, whereas the previous decomposition is known as the right polar decomposition. Left polar decomposition is also known as reverse polar decomposition.

The **polar decomposition** of a square invertible real matrix [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is of the form
[math]\displaystyle{ A = |A|R }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ |A| = \left(AA^\textsf{T}\right)^\frac{1}{2} }[/math] is a positive-definite matrix and [math]\displaystyle{ R = |A|^{-1}A }[/math] is an orthogonal matrix.

### Relation to Normal matrices

The matrix [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] with polar decomposition [math]\displaystyle{ A=UP }[/math] is normal if and only [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] commute: [math]\displaystyle{ UP = PU }[/math], or equivalently, they are simultaneously diagonalizable.

## Construction and proofs of existence

The core idea behind the construction of the polar decomposition is similar to that used to compute the singular-value decomposition.

For any [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math], the matrix [math]\displaystyle{ A^* A }[/math] is Hermitian and positive semi-definite, and therefore unitarily equivalent to a positive semi-definite *diagonal* matrix. Let then [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math] be the unitary matrix such that [math]\displaystyle{ A^* A = VDV^* }[/math], with [math]\displaystyle{ D }[/math] diagonal and positive semi-definite.

### Derivation for normal matrices

If [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is normal, then it is unitarily equivalent to a diagonal matrix: [math]\displaystyle{ A = V\Lambda V^* }[/math] for some unitary matrix [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math] and some diagonal matrix [math]\displaystyle{ \Lambda }[/math]. This makes the derivation of its polar decomposition particularly straightforward, as we can then write
[math]\displaystyle{ A = V\Phi_\Lambda |\Lambda|V^* = \underbrace{\left(V\Phi_\Lambda V^*\right)}_{\equiv U} \underbrace{\left(V |\Lambda| V^*\right)}_{\equiv P}, }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ \Phi_\Lambda }[/math] is a diagonal matrix containing the *phases* of the elements of [math]\displaystyle{ \Lambda }[/math], that is, [math]\displaystyle{ (\Phi_\Lambda)_{ii}\equiv \Lambda_{ii}/ |\Lambda_{ii}| }[/math] when [math]\displaystyle{ \Lambda_{ii}\neq 0 }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ (\Phi_\Lambda)_{ii}=0 }[/math] when [math]\displaystyle{ \Lambda_{ii}=0 }[/math].

The polar decomposition is thus [math]\displaystyle{ A=UP }[/math], with [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] diagonal in the eigenbasis of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] and having eigenvalues equal to the phases and absolute values of those of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math], respectively.

### Derivation for invertible matrices

From the singular-value decomposition, it can be shown that a matrix [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is invertible if and only if [math]\displaystyle{ A^* A }[/math] (equivalently, [math]\displaystyle{ AA^* }[/math]) is. Moreover, this is true if and only if the eigenvalues of [math]\displaystyle{ A^* A }[/math] are all not zero.^{[6]}

In this case, the polar decomposition is directly obtained by writing [math]\displaystyle{ A = A\left(A^* A\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}\left(A^* A\right)^\frac{1}{2}, }[/math] and observing that [math]\displaystyle{ A\left(A^* A\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} }[/math] is unitary. To see this, we can exploit the spectral decomposition of [math]\displaystyle{ A^* A }[/math] to write [math]\displaystyle{ A\left(A^* A\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} = AVD^{-\frac{1}{2}}V^* }[/math].

In this expression, [math]\displaystyle{ V^* }[/math] is unitary because [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math] is. To show that also [math]\displaystyle{ AVD^{-\frac{1}{2}} }[/math] is unitary, we can use the SVD to write [math]\displaystyle{ A = WD^\frac{1}{2}V^* }[/math], so that [math]\displaystyle{ AV D^{-\frac{1}{2}} = WD^\frac{1}{2}V^* VD^{-\frac{1}{2}} = W, }[/math] where again [math]\displaystyle{ W }[/math] is unitary by construction.

Yet another way to directly show the unitarity of [math]\displaystyle{ A\left(A^* A\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} }[/math] is to note that, writing the SVD of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] in terms of rank-1 matrices as [math]\displaystyle{ A = \sum_k s_k v_k w_k^* }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ s_k }[/math]are the singular values of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math], we have [math]\displaystyle{ A\left(A^* A\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} = \left(\sum_j \lambda_j v_j w_j^*\right)\left(\sum_k |\lambda_k|^{-1} w_k w_k^*\right) = \sum_k \frac{\lambda_k}{|\lambda_k|} v_k w_k^*, }[/math] which directly implies the unitarity of [math]\displaystyle{ A\left(A^* A\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} }[/math] because a matrix is unitary if and only if its singular values have unitary absolute value.

Note how, from the above construction, it follows that *the unitary matrix in the polar decomposition of an invertible matrix is uniquely defined*.

### General derivation

The SVD of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] reads [math]\displaystyle{ A = W D^\frac{1}{2} V^* }[/math], with [math]\displaystyle{ W, V }[/math] unitary matrices, and [math]\displaystyle{ D }[/math] a diagonal, positive semi-definite matrix. By simply inserting an additional pair of [math]\displaystyle{ W }[/math]s or [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math]s, we obtain the two forms of the polar decomposition of [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math]: [math]\displaystyle{ A = WD^\frac{1}{2}V^* = \underbrace{\left(W D^\frac{1}{2} W^*\right)}_P \underbrace{\left(W V^*\right)}_U = \underbrace{\left(W V^*\right)}_U \underbrace{\left(VD^\frac{1}{2} V^*\right)}_{P'}. }[/math]

## Bounded operators on Hilbert space

The **polar decomposition** of any bounded linear operator *A* between complex Hilbert spaces is a canonical factorization as the product of a partial isometry and a non-negative operator.

The polar decomposition for matrices generalizes as follows: if *A* is a bounded linear operator then there is a unique factorization of *A* as a product *A* = *UP* where *U* is a partial isometry, *P* is a non-negative self-adjoint operator and the initial space of *U* is the closure of the range of *P*.

The operator *U* must be weakened to a partial isometry, rather than unitary, because of the following issues. If *A* is the one-sided shift on *l*^{2}(**N**), then |*A*| = {*A ^{*}A*}

^{1/2}=

*I*. So if

*A*=

*U*|

*A*|,

*U*must be

*A*, which is not unitary.

The existence of a polar decomposition is a consequence of Douglas' lemma:

**Lemma** — If *A*, *B* are bounded operators on a Hilbert space *H*, and *A ^{*}A* ≤

*B*, then there exists a contraction

^{*}B*C*such that

*A = CB*. Furthermore,

*C*is unique if

*Ker*(

*B*) ⊂

^{*}*Ker*(

*C*).

The operator *C* can be defined by *C*(*Bh*) := *Ah* for all *h* in *H*, extended by continuity to the closure of *Ran*(*B*), and by zero on the orthogonal complement to all of *H*. The lemma then follows since *A ^{*}A* ≤

*B*implies

^{*}B*Ker*(

*B*) ⊂

*Ker*(

*A*).

In particular. If *A ^{*}A* =

*B*, then

^{*}B*C*is a partial isometry, which is unique if

*Ker*(

*B*) ⊂

^{*}*Ker*(

*C*). In general, for any bounded operator

*A*, [math]\displaystyle{ A^*A = \left(A^*A\right)^\frac{1}{2} \left(A^*A\right)^\frac{1}{2}, }[/math] where (

*A*)

^{*}A^{1/2}is the unique positive square root of

*A*given by the usual functional calculus. So by the lemma, we have [math]\displaystyle{ A = U\left(A^*A\right)^\frac{1}{2} }[/math] for some partial isometry

^{*}A*U*, which is unique if

*Ker*(

*A*) ⊂

^{*}*Ker*(

*U*). Take

*P*to be (

*A*)

^{*}A^{1/2}and one obtains the polar decomposition

*A*=

*UP*. Notice that an analogous argument can be used to show

*A = P'U'*, where

*P'*is positive and

*U'*a partial isometry.

When *H* is finite-dimensional, *U* can be extended to a unitary operator; this is not true in general (see example above). Alternatively, the polar decomposition can be shown using the operator version of singular value decomposition.

By property of the continuous functional calculus, |*A*| is in the C*-algebra generated by *A*. A similar but weaker statement holds for the partial isometry: *U* is in the von Neumann algebra generated by *A*. If *A* is invertible, the polar part *U* will be in the C*-algebra as well.

## Unbounded operators

If *A* is a closed, densely defined unbounded operator between complex Hilbert spaces then it still has a (unique) **polar decomposition**
[math]\displaystyle{ A = U |A| }[/math]
where |*A*| is a (possibly unbounded) non-negative self adjoint operator with the same domain as *A*, and *U* is a partial isometry vanishing on the orthogonal complement of the range *Ran*(|*A*|).

The proof uses the same lemma as above, which goes through for unbounded operators in general. If *Dom*(*A ^{*}A*) =

*Dom*(

*B*) and

^{*}B*A*=

^{*}Ah*B*for all

^{*}Bh*h*∈

*Dom*(

*A*), then there exists a partial isometry

^{*}A*U*such that

*A*=

*UB*.

*U*is unique if

*Ran*(

*B*)

^{⊥}⊂

*Ker*(

*U*). The operator

*A*being closed and densely defined ensures that the operator

*A*is self-adjoint (with dense domain) and therefore allows one to define (

^{*}A*A*)

^{*}A^{1/2}. Applying the lemma gives polar decomposition.

If an unbounded operator *A* is affiliated to a von Neumann algebra **M**, and *A* = *UP* is its polar decomposition, then *U* is in **M** and so is the spectral projection of *P*, 1_{B}(*P*), for any Borel set *B* in [0, ∞).

## Quaternion polar decomposition

The polar decomposition of quaternions **H** depends on the unit 2-dimensional sphere [math]\displaystyle{ \lbrace x i + y j + z k \in H : x^2 + y^2 +z^2 = 1 \rbrace }[/math] of square roots of minus one. Given any *r* on this sphere, and an angle −π < *a* ≤ π, the versor [math]\displaystyle{ e^{ar} = \cos (a) + r\ \sin (a) }[/math] is on the unit 3-sphere of **H**. For *a* = 0 and *a* = π, the versor is 1 or −1 regardless of which *r* is selected. The norm *t* of a quaternion *q* is the Euclidean distance from the origin to *q*. When a quaternion is not just a real number, then there is a *unique* polar decomposition [math]\displaystyle{ q = t e^{ar}. }[/math]

## Alternative planar decompositions

In the Cartesian plane, alternative planar ring decompositions arise as follows:

- If
*x*≠ 0,*z*=*x*(1 + ε(*y*/*x*)) is a polar decomposition of a dual number*z*=*x*+*yε*, where*ε*^{2}= 0; i.e.,*ε*is nilpotent. In this polar decomposition, the unit circle has been replaced by the line*x*= 1, the polar angle by the slope*y*/*x*, and the radius*x*is negative in the left half-plane. - If
*x*^{2}≠*y*^{2}, then the unit hyperbola*x*^{2}−*y*^{2}= 1 and its conjugate*x*^{2}−*y*^{2}= −1 can be used to form a polar decomposition based on the branch of the unit hyperbola through (1, 0). This branch is parametrized by the hyperbolic angle*a*and is written[math]\displaystyle{ \cosh(a) + j\ \sinh(a) = \exp(aj) = e^{aj} }[/math] where

The set { 1, −1, j, −j } has products that make it isomorphic to the Klein four-group. Evidently polar decomposition in this case involves an element from that group.*j*^{2}= +1 and the arithmetic^{[7]}of split-complex numbers is used. The branch through (−1, 0) is traced by −*e*^{aj}. Since the operation of multiplying by j reflects a point across the line*y*=*x*, the second hyperbola has branches traced by*je*^{aj}or −*je*^{aj}. Therefore a point in one of the quadrants has a polar decomposition in one of the forms: [math]\displaystyle{ r e^{aj}, - re^{aj}, rje^{aj}, -rje^{aj}, \quad r \gt 0 }[/math]

## Numerical determination of the matrix polar decomposition

To compute an approximation of the polar decomposition *A* = *UP*, usually the unitary factor *U* is approximated.^{[8]}^{[9]} The iteration is based on Heron's method for the square root of *1* and computes, starting from [math]\displaystyle{ U_0 = A }[/math], the sequence
[math]\displaystyle{ U_{k+1} = \frac{1}{2}\left(U_k + \left(U_k^*\right )^{-1}\right),\qquad k = 0, 1, 2, \ldots }[/math]

The combination of inversion and Hermite conjugation is chosen so that in the singular value decomposition, the unitary factors remain the same and the iteration reduces to Heron's method on the singular values.

This basic iteration may be refined to speed up the process:

- Every step or in regular intervals, the range of the singular values of [math]\displaystyle{ U_k }[/math] is estimated and then the matrix is rescaled to [math]\displaystyle{ \gamma_k U_k }[/math] to center the singular values around
*1*. The scaling factor [math]\displaystyle{ \gamma_k }[/math] is computed using matrix norms of the matrix and its inverse. Examples of such scale estimates are:[math]\displaystyle{ \gamma_k = \sqrt[4]{\frac{\left\|U_k^{-1}\right\|_1 \left\|U_k^{-1}\right\|_\infty}{\left\|U_k\right\|_1 \left\|U_k\right\|_\infty} } }[/math] using the row-sum and column-sum matrix norms or [math]\displaystyle{ \gamma_k = \sqrt{\frac{\left\|U_k^{-1}\right\|_F}{\left\|U_k\right\|_F}} }[/math] using the Frobenius norm. Including the scale factor, the iteration is now

[math]\displaystyle{ U_{k+1} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\gamma_k U_k + \frac{1}{\gamma_k} \left(U_k^*\right)^{-1}\right), \qquad k = 0, 1, 2, \ldots }[/math] - The QR decomposition can be used in a preparation step to reduce a singular matrix
*A*to a smaller regular matrix, and inside every step to speed up the computation of the inverse. - Heron's method for computing roots of [math]\displaystyle{ x^2 - 1 = 0 }[/math] can be replaced by higher order methods, for instance based on Halley's method of third order, resulting in
[math]\displaystyle{ U_{k+1} = U_k\left(I + 3U_k^* U_k\right)^{-1}\left(3I + U_k^* U_k\right),\qquad k = 0, 1, 2, \ldots }[/math]
This iteration can again be combined with rescaling. This particular formula has the benefit that it is also applicable to singular or rectangular matrices
*A*.

## See also

- Cartan decomposition
- Algebraic polar decomposition
- Polar decomposition of a complex measure
- Lie group decomposition

## References

- ↑ Hall 2015 Section 2.5
- ↑ Hall 2015 Theorem 2.17
- ↑ Hall 2015 Section 13.3
- ↑
Higham, Nicholas J.; Schreiber, Robert S. (1990). "Fast polar decomposition of an arbitrary matrix".
*SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput.*(Philadelphia, PA, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)**11**(4): 648-655. doi:10.1137/0911038. ISSN 0196-5204. - ↑ Hall 2015 Lemma 2.18
- ↑ Note how this implies, by the positivity of [math]\displaystyle{ A^* A }[/math], that the eigenvalues are all real and strictly positive.
- ↑ Sobczyk, G.(1995) "Hyperbolic Number Plane",
*College Mathematics Journal 26:268–80* - ↑
Higham, Nicholas J. (1986). "Computing the polar decomposition with applications".
*SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput.*(Philadelphia, PA, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)**7**(4): 1160–1174. doi:10.1137/0907079. ISSN 0196-5204. - ↑
Byers, Ralph; Hongguo Xu (2008). "A New Scaling for Newton's Iteration for the Polar Decomposition and its Backward Stability".
*SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl.*(Philadelphia, PA, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)**30**(2): 822–843. doi:10.1137/070699895. ISSN 0895-4798.

- Conway, J.B.: A Course in Functional Analysis. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York: Springer 1990
- Douglas, R.G.: On Majorization, Factorization, and Range Inclusion of Operators on Hilbert Space. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
**17**, 413-415 (1966) - Hall, Brian C. (2015),
*Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction*, Graduate Texts in Mathematics,**222**(2nd ed.), Springer, ISBN 978-3319134666. - Helgason, Sigurdur (1978),
*Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces*, Academic Press, ISBN 0-8218-2848-7

Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar decomposition.
Read more |