Beth definability
In mathematical logic, Beth definability is a result that connects implicit definability of a property to its explicit definability, specifically the theorem states that the two senses of definability are equivalent.
Statement
The theorem states that, given a first-order theory T in the language L' ⊇ L and a formula φ in L', then the following are equivalent:
- for any two models A and B of T such that A|L = B|L (where A|L is the reduct of A to L), it is the case that A ⊨ φ[a] if and only if B ⊨ φ[a] (for all tuples a of A)
- φ is equivalent modulo T to a formula ψ in L.
Less formally: a property is implicitly definable in a theory in language L (via introduction of a new symbol φ of an extended language L') only if that property is explicitly definable in that theory (by formula ψ in the original language L).
Clearly the converse holds as well, so that we have an equivalence between implicit and explicit definability. That is, a "property" is implicitly definable with respect to a theory if and only if it is explicitly definable.
The theorem does not hold if the condition is restricted to finite models. We may have A ⊨ φ[a] if and only if B ⊨ φ[a] for all pairs A,B of finite models without there being any L-formula ψ equivalent to φ modulo T.
The result was first proven by Evert Willem Beth.
Sources
- Hodges W. A Shorter Model Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
This article does not cite any external source. HandWiki requires at least one external source. See citing external sources. (04-August) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beth definability.
Read more |