Physics:Quantum Measurement operators

From HandWiki

In quantum mechanics, measurement operators provide a general mathematical framework for describing the outcomes of a measurement and the associated change of a quantum state. They unify different types of quantum measurements, including projective measurements and POVMs.[1]

Measurement operators represented on the Bloch sphere. POVMs (red) generalize projective measurements for distinguishing quantum states (blue).

Introduction

A quantum measurement is described by a set of operators {Mm}, each associated with a possible outcome m. If the system is in a state |ψ⟩, the probability of outcome m is given by the Born rule: P(m)=⟨ψ|Mm†Mm|ψ⟩.[1]

After the measurement, the state changes to: Mm|ψ⟩⟨ψ|Mm†Mm|ψ⟩.

The operators satisfy the completeness relation: ∑mMm†Mm=I.

Relation to other measurement formalisms

Measurement operators provide a unified description of different types of quantum measurements:

  • Projective measurements correspond to projection operators onto eigenstates of an observable.[2]
  • POVMs generalize this framework by allowing non-projective measurement elements.[1]
  • Kraus operators describe the most general state transformations associated with measurement processes.[3]

In the POVM formalism, one defines: Em=Mm†Mm, with: ∑mEm=I.

The probability of outcome m for a general quantum state ρ is: Prob(m)=tr⁡(ρEm).[1]

State change and Kraus operators

Measurement not only yields probabilities but also changes the quantum state. This transformation can be described using Kraus operators Ai, such that: Ei=Ai†Ai.

If outcome i is obtained, the state ρ transforms as: ρ→AiρAi†tr⁡(ρEi).[3]

Summing over all possible outcomes gives a quantum channel: ρ→∑iAiρAi†.[4]

Examples

Measurement operators play a central role in quantum-information tasks such as quantum state discrimination. In this setting, a system is prepared in one of several possible states {σi}, and a measurement is used to determine which state was given.

Using a POVM {Ei}, the probability of correctly identifying the state is: Psuccess=∑ipitr⁡(σiEi),[4]

where pi is the prior probability of state σi.

For two states, the optimal measurement is given by the Helstrom measurement: Psuccess=12+12‖p0σ0−p1σ1‖1.[5]

More generally, optimal measurements can be formulated as optimization problems and solved numerically, for example using semidefinite programming.[6]

Physical interpretation

Measurement operators encode both the probabilities of outcomes and the transformation of the quantum state. Unlike classical measurements, quantum measurements generally disturb the system, reflecting the non-commutative structure of quantum observables.[2]

See also

Table of contents (185 articles)

Index

Full contents

9. Quantum optics and experiments (5) ↑ Back to index
14. Plasma and fusion physics (8) ↑ Back to index
Conceptual illustration of plasma physics in a fusion context, showing magnetically confined ionized gas in a tokamak and the collective behavior governed by electromagnetic fields and transport processes.
Conceptual illustration of plasma physics in a fusion context, showing magnetically confined ionized gas in a tokamak and the collective behavior governed by electromagnetic fields and transport processes.

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac L. (2000). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Peres, Asher (1995). Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer Academic. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Kraus, Karl (1983). States, Effects, and Operations. Springer. 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Watrous, John (2018). The Theory of Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press. 
  5. ↑ Helstrom, Carl W. (1976). Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory. Academic Press. 
  6. ↑ Bae, Joonwoo; Kwek, Leong-Chuan (2015). "Quantum state discrimination and its applications". Journal of Physics A 48. 


Author: Harold Foppele