Physics:Quantum Relaxation and thermalization

From HandWiki

Back to Statistical mechanics and kinetic theory

Quantum relaxation and thermalization describe how a system prepared out of equilibrium evolves toward a stationary state and, under suitable conditions, toward a state consistent with quantum statistical mechanics.[1][2] Relaxation refers to the approach of observables toward long-time stationary values, while thermalization means that those values are described by thermal ensembles such as the canonical or microcanonical ensemble.[3]

In general, the natural tendency of many-body systems is toward thermal equilibrium, increasing entropy and erasing accessible memory of the initial preparation, although important exceptions exist in integrable, localized, or specially constrained systems.[4][5]

Relaxation and thermalization in quantum systems describe how nonequilibrium states evolve toward stationary behavior through dephasing, interactions, and coupling to an environment.

Basic idea

For an isolated quantum system, the full state evolves unitarily according to the Schrödinger equation,

it|ψ(t)=H|ψ(t),

so the microscopic dynamics are reversible.[4] Yet experimentally relevant observables may still relax because of dephasing between many energy eigenstates, redistribution of correlations, and the practical inaccessibility of detailed phase information in local measurements.[2][4]

A thermal equilibrium state is commonly represented by the density operator

ρth=eβHZ,Z=Tr(eβH),

where β=1/(kBT) and Z is the partition function.[1]

Equilibration versus thermalization

Equilibration and thermalization are related but distinct concepts.[2] A system equilibrates when expectation values of observables become nearly time-independent for most late times, even if the exact state continues to evolve unitarily. It thermalizes when those stationary values coincide with predictions from an appropriate thermal ensemble determined by conserved quantities such as energy.[3]

Thus a system can relax without becoming thermal in the ordinary Gibbs sense. This distinction is central in modern nonequilibrium quantum theory.[1][2]

Eigenstate thermalization

For generic nonintegrable many-body systems, thermalization is commonly explained by the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH). ETH states that expectation values of simple observables in individual many-body energy eigenstates are smooth functions of energy, so a single eigenstate already exhibits thermal properties for such observables.[3][1]

If the initial state is expanded as

|ψ(0)=ncn|En,

then the long-time average of an observable A is approximately determined by diagonal matrix elements,

A=n|cn|2En|A|En.

Under ETH, the dependence of En|A|En on energy is smooth, so the long-time value agrees with the thermodynamic prediction for a narrow energy window.[3][1]

Integrable systems and generalized Gibbs ensembles

Integrable systems possess an extensive number of conserved quantities, so ordinary thermalization may fail. Instead, such systems can relax to a generalized Gibbs ensemble (GGE), which includes all relevant conserved charges.[6]

The GGE density operator is written as

ρGGE=1ZGGEexp(jλjIj),

where Ij are conserved quantities and λj are fixed by the initial state.[6] This is one of the clearest ways in which quantum relaxation can differ from ordinary thermalization.[1]

Open systems and dissipative relaxation

Real systems are rarely perfectly isolated. When coupled to an environment, their reduced dynamics are described by density matrices and quantum master equations, so decoherence and dissipation contribute directly to relaxation.[7]

A typical master equation has the form

dρdt=i[H,ρ]+𝒟[ρ],

where the dissipator 𝒟[ρ] encodes coupling to the surroundings.[7] In weak-coupling and approximately Markovian regimes, this often drives the system toward a stationary or thermal state.[7]

Magnetic resonance as a relaxation example

A concrete and experimentally important example of quantum relaxation occurs in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), where an observable nuclear spin polarization is created by an external magnetic field and then perturbed by resonant radiofrequency pulses.[8] The return of the longitudinal magnetization to equilibrium is called spin-lattice relaxation, while the loss of transverse phase coherence is called spin-spin relaxation.[9][10]

For spin-12 nuclei, the population imbalance is governed by the Boltzmann distribution,

N+N=eΔE/(kBT),

where ΔE is the Zeeman energy splitting.[9] Because this energy gap is extremely small at ordinary magnetic fields, spontaneous radiative emission is negligible, and relaxation instead occurs through fluctuating local fields generated by surrounding molecules, nuclei, or electrons.[9][10]

Longitudinal and transverse relaxation

The decay of RF-induced spin polarization is described by the two characteristic times T1 and T2.[8][11]

The longitudinal or spin-lattice relaxation time T1 governs the return of the magnetization component parallel to the static field:

Mz(t)=Mz,eq[Mz,eqMz(0)]et/T1.

If the magnetization starts in the transverse plane so that Mz(0)=0, this reduces to

Mz(t)=Mz,eq(1et/T1).

In inversion recovery, with Mz(0)=Mz,eq, one obtains

Mz(t)=Mz,eq(12et/T1).

The transverse or spin-spin relaxation time T2 describes the decay of the coherent magnetization perpendicular to the field:

Mxy(t)=Mxy(0)et/T2.

This is fundamentally a decoherence process produced by fluctuating local precession frequencies and progressive phase scrambling of the spins.[11][8]

T2* and field inhomogeneity

In real magnetic resonance experiments, additional dephasing is caused by magnetic field inhomogeneity. This produces an apparent decay time T2*, usually shorter than T2, according to

1T2*=1T2+1Tinhom=1T2+γΔB0.

Unlike true spin-spin relaxation, inhomogeneity-induced dephasing can often be refocused by a spin-echo sequence, so it is not an irreversible relaxation mechanism in the strict microscopic sense.[12]

Bloch equations

A phenomenological description of magnetic resonance relaxation is provided by the Bloch equations, introduced by Felix Bloch.[13] For the magnetization vector 𝐌=(Mx,My,Mz) in a magnetic field 𝐁(t) they are

Mxt=γ(𝐌×𝐁)xMxT2,

Myt=γ(𝐌×𝐁)yMyT2,

Mzt=γ(𝐌×𝐁)zMzM0T1.

These equations combine coherent Larmor precession with phenomenological longitudinal and transverse relaxation.[13][11]

Microscopic relaxation mechanisms

Microscopically, relaxation requires couplings that allow the spin system to exchange energy or phase information with its surroundings. In NMR the dominant mechanisms often include magnetic dipole-dipole interactions, chemical shift anisotropy, spin-rotation coupling, and quadrupolar interactions for nuclei with I1.[9] Molecular reorientation modulates these couplings in time, and the resulting fluctuations drive transitions between nuclear spin states.[9]

Within time-dependent perturbation theory, relaxation rates are determined by spectral density functions, which are Fourier transforms of autocorrelation functions of these fluctuating interactions.[9]

BPP theory

A classic microscopic model is the Bloembergen-Purcell-Pound (BPP) theory, which explains nuclear relaxation in terms of molecular tumbling and an exponentially decaying autocorrelation function.[14] If the correlation function is proportional to et/τc, then for dipolar relaxation one finds

1T1=K[τc1+ω02τc2+4τc1+4ω02τc2],

1T2=K2[3τc+5τc1+ω02τc2+2τc1+4ω02τc2].

Here τc is the rotational correlation time and ω0 is the Larmor angular frequency.[14] BPP theory works well for simple liquids and gives a microscopic picture of how molecular motion controls relaxation rates.[9]

Prethermalization and slow relaxation

Some nearly integrable or weakly perturbed quantum systems show prethermalization: observables first relax to a long-lived quasistationary state and only much later drift toward full thermal equilibrium.[4][1] This reflects the presence of approximately conserved quantities and separated timescales in the dynamics.

Systems resisting thermalization

Not all systems thermalize rapidly or at all. Integrable systems relax to GGEs rather than conventional Gibbs states.[6] Many-body localized systems can retain memory of their initial conditions in local observables for arbitrarily long times, preventing ordinary thermalization.[5] Other unusual nonthermal behavior appears in systems with dynamical constraints, quantum scars, or special symmetry structures.[5][1]

Physical interpretation

Quantum relaxation and thermalization connect reversible microscopic laws with irreversible macroscopic behavior:

  • dephasing suppresses coherent oscillations in observables
  • interactions redistribute energy and correlations
  • conserved quantities constrain the final stationary state
  • coupling to an environment introduces dissipation and decoherence
  • coarse-grained measurements reveal equilibration even when the full state remains pure and unitary[4][7][2]

Applications

Quantum relaxation and thermalization are important in:

See also

Table of content (86 articles)

Core pathway

  1. Physics:Quantum basics
  2. Physics:Quantum mechanics
  3. Physics:Quantum mechanics measurements
  4. Physics:Quantum Interpretations of quantum mechanics
  5. Physics:Quantum Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory
  6. Physics:Quantum Atomic structure and spectroscopy
  7. Physics:Quantum Density matrix
  8. Physics:Quantum Open systems
  9. Physics:Quantum Statistical mechanics
  10. Physics:Quantum Kinetic theory
  11. Physics:Plasma physics (fusion context)
  12. Physics:Tokamak physics
  13. Physics:Tokamak edge physics and recycling asymmetries

Full contents

11. Plasma and fusion physics (3)
  1. Physics:Plasma physics (fusion context)
  2. Physics:Tokamak physics
  3. Physics:Tokamak edge physics and recycling asymmetries
    • Hierarchy of modern physics models showing the progression from quantum statistical mechanics to kinetic theory and plasma physics, culminating in tokamak edge transport and recycling asymmetries.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 D'Alessio, Luca; Kafri, Yariv; Polkovnikov, Anatoli; Rigol, Marcos (2016). "From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics". Advances in Physics 65 (3): 239–362. doi:10.1080/00018732.2016.1198134. https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06411. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Gogolin, Christian; Eisert, Jens (2016). "Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems". Reports on Progress in Physics 79 (5): 056001. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/5/056001. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07538. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Rigol, Marcos; Dunjko, Vanja; Olshanii, Maxim (2008). "Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems". Nature 452: 854–858. doi:10.1038/nature06838. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06838. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Polkovnikov, Anatoli; Sengupta, Krishnendu; Silva, Alessandro; Vengalattore, Mukund (2011). "Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems". Reviews of Modern Physics 83 (3): 863–883. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.863. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.863. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Nandkishore, Rahul; Huse, David A. (2015). "Many-Body Localization and Thermalization in Quantum Statistical Mechanics". Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6: 15–38. doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014726. https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.0686. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Rigol, Marcos; Dunjko, Vanja; Yurovsky, Vladimir; Olshanii, Maxim (2007). "Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of lattice hard-core bosons". Physical Review Letters 98 (5): 050405. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.050405. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.050405. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Breuer, Heinz-Peter; Petruccione, Francesco (2002). The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198520634. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-theory-of-open-quantum-systems-9780198520634. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Rinck, Peter A. (2022). Relaxation Times and Basic Pulse Sequences in MR Imaging. in: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. A Critical Introduction. 12th edition. pp. 65-92.. Offprint to download: TRTF - The Round Table Foundation / EMRF - European Magnetic Resonance Forum. ISBN 978-3-7460-9518-9. http://trtf.eu/textbook.htm. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 Abragam, A. (1961). "VII Thermal Relaxation in Liquids and Gases". Principles of Nuclear Magnetism. Oxford University Press. p. 264. ISBN 019852014X. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 Hoult, D. I.; Bahkar, B. (1998). "NMR Signal Reception: Virtual Photons and Coherent Spontaneous Emission". Concepts in Magnetic Resonance 9 (5): 277–297. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0534(1997)9:5<277::AID-CMR1>3.0.CO;2-W. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Levitt, Malcolm H. (2008). Spin Dynamics: Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (2 ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780470511176. 
  12. Chavhan, Govind B.; Babyn, Paul S.; Thomas, Bejoy; Shroff, Manohar M.; Haacke, E. Mark (2009). "Principles, Techniques, and Applications of T2*-based MR Imaging and its Special Applications". Radiographics 29 (5): 1433–1449. doi:10.1148/rg.295095034. PMID 19755604. 
  13. 13.0 13.1 Bloch, F. (1946). "Nuclear Induction". Physical Review 70: 460–473. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.70.460. 
  14. 14.0 14.1 Bloembergen, N.; Purcell, E. M.; Pound, R. V. (1948). "Relaxation Effects in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Absorption". Physical Review 73 (7): 679–712. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.73.679. 
Author: Harold Foppele