Physics:Quantum Density matrix

From HandWiki

Density matrix is an operator used in quantum mechanics to describe the state of a quantum system. It provides a unified formalism for both pure states, represented by state vectors, and mixed states, represented by statistical ensembles of state vectors.[1][2] The density matrix is important in quantum statistical mechanics, quantum measurement theory, and the theory of open quantum systems, where a subsystem is generally not described by a single wavefunction.[3]

Definition

A quantum state may be represented by a density matrix ρ, which is a linear operator acting on the system's Hilbert space. For a pure state |ψ⟩, the density matrix is

ρ=|ψ⟩⟨ψ|.[4]

More generally, for an ensemble of states {|ψi⟩} occurring with probabilities pi, the density matrix is

ρ=∑ipi|ψi⟩⟨ψi|,

with

pi≥0,∑ipi=1.[5]

Thus the density matrix extends the usual state-vector formalism to cases where there is classical uncertainty about which pure state has been prepared.

Properties

A density matrix ρ satisfies the following conditions:[6][7]

  1. Hermiticity
    ρ=ρ†
  2. Unit trace
    Tr(ρ)=1
  3. Positive semidefiniteness
    ρ≥0

These conditions are not only necessary but also sufficient: any operator satisfying them is a valid density matrix.[8]

For a pure state, the density matrix is idempotent:

ρ2=ρ.

Equivalently,

Tr(ρ2)=1.

For a mixed state,

Tr(ρ2)<1.[9]

The quantity Tr(ρ2) is called the purity of the state.

Matrix representation

If {|n⟩} is an orthonormal basis, the density matrix may be written in components as

ρmn=⟨m|ρ|n⟩.

For a two-level system with

|ψ⟩=α|0⟩+β|1⟩,

the corresponding pure-state density matrix is

ρ=(|α|2αβ*α*β|β|2).[10]

The diagonal elements represent populations in the chosen basis, while the off-diagonal elements represent quantum coherences.[11]

Expectation values

The expectation value of an observable represented by an operator A is given by

⟨A⟩=Tr(ρA).[12][13]

This formula applies to both pure and mixed states, which is one reason the density matrix formalism is so useful.

Reduced density matrix

For a composite system with Hilbert space ℋA⊗ℋB, the state of subsystem A is described by the reduced density matrix

ρA=TrB(ρAB),

where TrB denotes the partial trace over subsystem B.[14][15]

Even if the total system is in a pure state, the reduced density matrix of a subsystem may be mixed. This feature is central to the study of quantum entanglement, decoherence, and open-system dynamics.[16]

Time evolution

For a closed quantum system, the density matrix evolves according to the von Neumann equation

iℏdρdt=[H,ρ],

where H is the Hamiltonian operator.[17][18]

This is the density-matrix analogue of the Schrödinger equation. For open systems interacting with an environment, the evolution is more general and is often described by a Lindbladian or other quantum master equations.[19][20]

Physical significance

The density matrix formalism is indispensable when:

  • the preparation procedure produces an ensemble rather than a definite pure state;
  • only a subsystem of a larger entangled system is considered;
  • decoherence suppresses phase relations in a preferred basis;
  • thermal equilibrium states are studied in quantum statistical mechanics.[21][22]

In these contexts, the density matrix provides a more general and physically realistic description than a single wavefunction.

See also

Table of contents (185 articles)

Index

Full contents

9. Quantum optics and experiments (5) ↑ Back to index
14. Plasma and fusion physics (8) ↑ Back to index
Conceptual illustration of plasma physics in a fusion context, showing magnetically confined ionized gas in a tokamak and the collective behavior governed by electromagnetic fields and transport processes.
Conceptual illustration of plasma physics in a fusion context, showing magnetically confined ionized gas in a tokamak and the collective behavior governed by electromagnetic fields and transport processes.


Author: Harold Foppele


References

  1. ↑ John von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 1955.
  2. ↑ R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  3. ↑ H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press, 2002.
  4. ↑ J. J. Sakurai and Jim Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2011.
  5. ↑ Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  6. ↑ Nielsen and Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  7. ↑ Breuer and Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press, 2002.
  8. ↑ Karl Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications, 3rd ed., Springer, 2012.
  9. ↑ Sakurai and Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2011.
  10. ↑ Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  11. ↑ Breuer and Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press, 2002.
  12. ↑ von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 1955.
  13. ↑ Sakurai and Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2011.
  14. ↑ Nielsen and Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  15. ↑ Breuer and Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press, 2002.
  16. ↑ Wojciech H. Zurek, "Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical," Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 715-775 (2003).
  17. ↑ von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 1955.
  18. ↑ Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications, 3rd ed., Springer, 2012.
  19. ↑ G. Lindblad, "On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups," Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119-130 (1976).
  20. ↑ Breuer and Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press, 2002.
  21. ↑ Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications, 3rd ed., Springer, 2012.
  22. ↑ Zurek, "Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical," Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 715-775 (2003).