User:WikiHarold/Sandbox

From HandWiki

What is quantum mechanics, and what is old quantum theory?

Physics-3871216 1920
The 1927 Solvay Conference in Brussels.

Quantum mechanics (QM), also called quantum physics or quantum theory, is the branch of physics that describes physical phenomena at microscopic scales. It departs from classical mechanics most clearly in the quantum realm of atomic and subatomic distances, where matter and radiation display both wave-like and particle-like behavior. Quantum mechanics provides the mathematical framework for describing the behavior and interactions of energy and matter under such conditions.[1]

In most contexts, the phrase quantum mechanics refers to the non-relativistic theory. More advanced theories that incorporate relativity, such as quantum field theory, are usually treated separately.

Old quantum theory refers to the collection of ideas developed between about 1900 and 1925, before the modern formulation of quantum mechanics. Although old quantum theory was never fully self-consistent, it produced a number of important successes and clearly showed that the classical Newtonian picture of matter was incomplete. In 1926, Erwin Schrödinger introduced a wave equation that reproduced the successes of old quantum theory while avoiding many of its ambiguities.[2] At about the same time, matrix mechanics was developed by Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan. The two formulations were later shown to be mathematically equivalent.[3]

This article focuses mainly on the more intuitive wave-mechanical formulation.

When is a system in the quantum realm?

Classical physics is usually concerned with everyday conditions: speeds much lower than the speed of light, and sizes much greater than atoms. Modern physics is often concerned with high velocities and very small distances.

The central constant of quantum mechanics is the Planck constant, denoted by h. This constant has no analogue in Newtonian mechanics. Its units may be written either as energy multiplied by time, or as momentum multiplied by distance; both are units of action.

A system is likely to display quantum behavior when a relevant mass, length scale, or momentum becomes small enough that the action of the system is comparable to h. In practice, this often occurs in the following situations:

  • Small mass. Electrons are much less massive than protons or neutrons. For this reason, the electrons in an atom must be treated quantum mechanically, while the nucleus can often be approximated as a fixed classical source of electric force.[4]
  • Small spatial confinement. A particle confined to a very small region, such as an electron inside an atom of typical size 1010 m, exhibits pronounced quantum effects.
  • Very low temperature. At extremely low temperatures, atomic motion becomes slow enough that quantum effects become macroscopically important.

A fourth important case arises in high-energy collisions, where particles may be created or destroyed. That subject belongs mainly to particle physics and quantum field theory, and is mostly beyond the scope of this article.[5]

Timeline

Black-body radiation 1900

A black body.

Old quantum theory effectively began in 1900, when Max Planck derived a formula that accurately reproduced the observed spectrum of black-body radiation. In doing so, he assumed that energy is emitted and absorbed only in discrete amounts, or quanta.

In Planck's model, the constant h appears in the relation between the energy E and frequency f of radiation:

E=hf

 

 

 

 

(Eq. 1)

This is now called the Planck relation. Planck himself did not initially interpret this as meaning that light literally consisted of particles. He regarded quantization as a property of the interaction between matter and radiation rather than of the radiation field itself.[33]

Equation (1) shows that energy is directly proportional to frequency. Since c=fλ, higher-frequency radiation has shorter wavelength and greater energy.

Photoelectric effect 1905

A schematic illustration of the photoelectric effect.

In 1905 Albert Einstein explained the photoelectric effect, in which electrons are emitted from a material illuminated by light. He proposed that light behaves, in certain experiments, as if it were made of localized packets of energy now called photons.

According to Einstein's interpretation, each photon has energy E=hf and transfers that energy to a single electron. This explains why increasing the light intensity increases the number of emitted electrons, while increasing the light frequency increases their maximum kinetic energy.

Einstein's work strongly reinforced the idea that electromagnetic radiation has both wave-like and particle-like properties.

Taylor makes things spooky with very dim light in 1909

Interference occurs even when particles pass one at a time.
Young's original drawing was used to predict the diffraction pattern for a given wavelength.
Light interferes with itself after passing through two slits.

At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Thomas Young argued that light behaves as a wave and supported this view with his famous double-slit experiment. Interference and diffraction are classic wave phenomena and were taken as strong evidence against Newton's corpuscular theory of light.

About a century later, G. I. Taylor repeated the experiment with light so weak that only one photon at a time was likely to be involved. Even under such conditions, an interference pattern gradually appeared.[34]

This is one of the earliest and most striking indications that a single quantum object can behave in a wave-like manner. Similar experiments have since been performed with electrons, atoms, and even large molecules.[35]

Bohr-Rutherford model 1913

Here E=E2E1 is the energy lost when an electron drops from a higher orbit to a lower one.

In 1913 Niels Bohr proposed a model of the hydrogen atom in which electrons move in circular orbits around the nucleus, but only certain orbits are allowed. The model is now known to be incomplete, yet it was an important milestone because it successfully explained the observed spectral lines of hydrogen.

In modern language, one may summarize the Bohr picture using standing-wave ideas:

nλ=2πr(n=1,2,3,)

 

 

 

 

(Eq. 2)

together with the de Broglie relation

λ=hp

 

 

 

 

(Eq. 3)

where p=mv in the nonrelativistic approximation.

Although Bohr did not originally formulate his theory in these terms, the standing-wave picture captures the idea that only certain orbits are compatible with a stable wave pattern. The energies of those allowed states are quantized, and radiation is emitted when the atom transitions between them.

Compton effect 1923

Compton scattering is somewhat analogous to a collision, though the correct treatment is relativistic.
A photon of wavelength λ scatters from an electron and emerges with wavelength λ.

In 1923 Arthur Compton showed that X-rays scattering from electrons behave as if the radiation carries momentum. The wavelength of the scattered radiation changes in a way that can be explained only if the incoming light is treated as a particle-like object with momentum.

For a photon, the momentum is not mv but rather p=hf/c. The Compton effect therefore provided strong evidence that light possesses not only energy but also momentum in discrete quanta.

de Broglie waves 1924

A traveling wave suggests how wave-like structure may be associated with a moving particle.

In 1924 Louis de Broglie proposed that the wave-particle duality of light should be extended to matter. If light, long understood as a wave, can also behave like a particle, then perhaps matter particles can also have wave-like properties.

Today the de Broglie relations are usually written as

p=k
E=ω

where =h/2π, k=2π/λ, and ω=2πf. These relations connect momentum with wavelength and energy with frequency.

De Broglie's proposal was bold, but it proved extraordinarily fruitful. It suggested that the quantized orbits of Bohr might eventually be replaced by a more general wave theory of matter.

Schrödinger wave equation 1926

Examples of wavefunctions for the quantum harmonic oscillator.
A simple wavepacket moving through space.

In 1926 Erwin Schrödinger introduced the wave equation that now bears his name:

itΨ(𝐫,t)=[22m2+V(𝐫,t)]Ψ(𝐫,t)

 

 

 

 

(Eq. 4)

This equation describes how the wavefunction Ψ evolves in time. It is deterministic in the sense that if the initial wavefunction is known, the later wavefunction is determined.

Schrödinger's equation reproduced the observed energy levels of the hydrogen atom and provided a general framework for quantum theory. At about the same time, matrix mechanics was developed independently and later shown to be equivalent.[36]

What is the nature of the wavefunction?

Schrödinger's equation predicts how the wavefunction changes, but it does not by itself say what the wavefunction is. Schrödinger initially hoped that |Ψ|2 might represent a kind of physical charge density. Max Born instead proposed the interpretation that |Ψ|2 is a probability density.[37]

This probabilistic interpretation became central to modern quantum mechanics. It means that the wavefunction does not directly tell us where a particle is, but rather the probabilities for the outcomes of measurements.

Davisson–Germer's accidental diffraction of electrons 1927

Davisson (left) and Germer (right).

While studying electron scattering from nickel, Davisson and Germer observed a diffraction pattern caused by the crystal structure of the target. Their experiment provided direct confirmation that electrons have wave-like properties, as predicted by de Broglie.[38]

This result was one of the key experimental supports for wave mechanics.

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle 1927

A narrow slit produces strong diffraction.
A wider slit produces less spreading.

Werner Heisenberg realized that the act of measurement is not a passive process in quantum mechanics. The more precisely one tries to localize a particle, the less precisely one can know its momentum.

A simple way to understand this is through diffraction. If a particle passes through a narrow slit, its position becomes better defined, but the emerging wave spreads out more strongly. This implies greater uncertainty in momentum. The result is expressed mathematically by

σxσp2

 

 

 

 

(Eq. 5)

where σx is the uncertainty in position and σp is the uncertainty in momentum.

Copenhagen interpretation

Wavepackets can become delocalized. In the probabilistic interpretation, what is spread out is the probability amplitude.

The Copenhagen interpretation treats the wavefunction as a tool for calculating probabilities. In this view:

  1. |Ψ|2ΔV gives the probability of finding the particle in a small volume ΔV.
  2. A superposition of energy eigenstates implies a probability distribution over possible measurement outcomes.
  3. A measurement can change the state, producing what is traditionally called wavefunction collapse.

These ideas remain conceptually controversial, but they form the standard operational framework used in most practical applications of quantum mechanics.

Schrödinger's cat 1935

A cat in a sealed box becomes the subject of a famous thought experiment about superposition and measurement.

In 1935 Schrödinger proposed his famous cat thought experiment in order to dramatize the interpretive difficulties of quantum mechanics. If a microscopic quantum event determines whether a poison flask is broken, then the standard quantum description seems to imply that the cat is in a superposition of "alive" and "dead" until a measurement is made.

The thought experiment was intended not as a defense of that conclusion, but as a criticism of taking the formalism too literally at macroscopic scales.[39]

Developments

Recent developments

Lamb shift 1947

Hydrogen energy levels including fine structure and the Lamb shift.

In 1947 Willis Lamb and Robert Retherford measured a small shift in hydrogen energy levels now known as the Lamb shift.[41] This result showed that a simple relativistic wave equation for the electron was not sufficient. The interaction of the electron with the quantized electromagnetic field had to be taken into account.

The Lamb shift became one of the early triumphs of quantum electrodynamics.

Quantum electrodynamics 1948

A Feynman diagram, a standard tool in quantum field theory.

By the late 1940s, Richard Feynman, Julian Schwinger, and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga had developed quantum electrodynamics (QED).[42] QED describes the interaction of light and charged matter and remains one of the most accurate physical theories ever constructed.

Many-worlds interpretation 1957

The cat paradox as viewed in the many-worlds interpretation.

In 1957 Hugh Everett III proposed the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.[43] In this interpretation, the wavefunction never collapses. Instead, measurement correlates observer and system, giving rise to effectively separate branches corresponding to different outcomes.

Whether this interpretation is the best one remains debated, but it permanently influenced discussions of quantum foundations.

Bell's theorem 1964

A schematic Bell-test setup.

In 1964 John Bell showed that no theory based on local hidden variables can reproduce all the predictions of quantum mechanics.[44] Bell's theorem turned a philosophical question into an experimentally testable one.

Quantum simulation 1981

A qubit may be represented on a Bloch sphere.

In 1981 Richard Feynman argued that quantum systems are difficult to simulate efficiently on classical computers and suggested using one quantum system to simulate another.[45] This idea helped launch the field of quantum computing.

Quantum cryptography 1984

An optical implementation of the BB84 protocol.

In 1984 Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard proposed the BB84 protocol.[46] BB84 showed that the laws of quantum mechanics can be used to distribute a secret key in such a way that eavesdropping becomes detectable.

Shor's algorithm 1994

Classical asymmetric cryptography may be threatened by large-scale quantum computation.

In 1994 Peter Shor discovered Shor's algorithm, which can factor integers efficiently on a quantum computer.[47] This dramatically increased interest in quantum computing because many classical cryptographic systems rely on the presumed difficulty of factoring.

Quantum error correction 1995

File:Shor code.svg
A quantum circuit for the Shor code.

Quantum states are extremely fragile, yet in 1995 researchers showed that quantum information can nevertheless be protected using quantum error correction.[48] This was a decisive conceptual breakthrough for quantum computing.

Quantum teleportation 1998

In 1998 early experimental demonstrations of quantum teleportation were achieved.[49] Quantum teleportation transfers a quantum state from one system to another using entanglement and classical communication; it does not transport matter itself.

Experimental Shor demonstration 2001

In 2001 a small-scale experimental implementation of Shor's algorithm was reported.[50] Although the example was tiny, it showed that nontrivial quantum algorithms could be demonstrated in the laboratory.

Loophole-free Bell tests 2015

A schematic two-channel Bell test.

In 2015 several groups reported loophole-free Bell tests.[51] These experiments closed the major loopholes that had left room for alternative explanations in earlier Bell tests, and they strongly supported the nonclassical correlations predicted by quantum mechanics.

Quantum field theory and particle physics

Modern particle physics is described by quantum field theory, in which particles are excitations of underlying fields. A prominent example is the Higgs boson, discovered in 2012, associated with the Higgs field that gives mass to other particles.

These developments lie beyond non-relativistic quantum mechanics but represent a natural extension of quantum theory to relativistic systems.

Quantum supremacy claim 2019

In 2019 Google announced that a quantum processor had completed a specific computational task faster than a known classical alternative and described the result as quantum supremacy.[52] Although the term and the practical importance of the benchmark were debated, the announcement marked a major public milestone in quantum computing.

Entanglement Nobel Prize 2022

Entanglement has moved from philosophical puzzle to experimental resource.

In 2022 the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Alain Aspect, John Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger for experiments with entangled photons, for establishing the violation of Bell inequalities, and for pioneering quantum information science.[53]




Fault-tolerant progress 2023

Illustration of different quantum computing paradigms

In 2023 further progress was reported toward fault-tolerant quantum computing, especially in the protection of logical qubits against errors.[54]


Scalable processors and error correction 2024

In 2024 work continued on larger quantum processors, improved calibration, and better implementations of error-correcting codes.[55]

Quantum computing and networking 2025

In 2025 research continued on fault-tolerant quantum computing and on quantum networking, including the distribution of entanglement across larger systems.[56]

See also

Index

Core theory Foundations Conceptual and interpretations Mathematical structure and systems Atomic and spectroscopy Wavefunctions and modes Quantum dynamics and evolution Measurement and information Quantum information and computing

Applications and extensions Quantum optics and experiments Open quantum systems Quantum field theory Statistical mechanics and kinetic theory Condensed matter and solid-state physics Plasma and fusion physics Timeline Advanced and frontier topics

Quantum Book II

  • Matter by scale
  • Quantum Book III

  • Methods and tools
  • Quantum Book IV

  • Data Analysis Techniques
  • Full contents

      Foundations

    1. Physics:Quantum basics
    2. Physics:Quantum Postulates
    3. Physics:Quantum Hilbert space
    4. Physics:Quantum Observables and operators
    5. Physics:Quantum mechanics
    6. Physics:Quantum mechanics measurements
    7. Physics:Quantum state
    8. Physics:Quantum system
    9. Physics:Quantum superposition
    10. Physics:Quantum probability
    11. Physics:Quantum Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory
    12. Conceptual and interpretations

    13. Physics:Quantum Interpretations of quantum mechanics
    14. Physics:Quantum Wave–particle duality
    15. Physics:Quantum Complementarity principle
    16. Physics:Quantum Uncertainty principle
    17. Physics:Quantum Measurement problem
    18. Physics:Quantum Bell's theorem
    19. Physics:Quantum Hidden variable theory
    20. Physics:Quantum nonlocality
    21. Physics:Quantum contextuality
    22. Physics:Quantum Darwinism
    23. Physics:Quantum A Spooky Action at a Distance
    24. Physics:Quantum A Walk Through the Universe
    25. Physics:Quantum The Secret of Cohesion and How Waves Hold Matter Together
    26. Physics:Quantum measurement problem
    27. Mathematical structure and systems

    28. Physics:Quantum Density matrix
    29. Physics:Quantum Exactly solvable quantum systems
    30. Physics:Quantum Formulas Collection
    31. Physics:Quantum A Matter Of Size
    32. Physics:Quantum Symmetry in quantum mechanics
    33. Physics:Quantum Angular momentum operator
    34. Physics:Quantum Runge–Lenz vector
    35. Physics:Quantum Approximation Methods
    36. Physics:Quantum Matter Elements and Particles
    37. Physics:Quantum Dirac equation
    38. Physics:Quantum Klein–Gordon equation
    39. Physics:Quantum pendulum
    40. Physics:Quantum configuration space
    41. Atomic and spectroscopy

      Quantum atomic structure and spectroscopy: orbitals, energy levels, and emission and absorption spectra.
      Quantum atomic structure and spectroscopy: orbitals, energy levels, and emission and absorption spectra.
    42. Physics:Quantum Atomic structure and spectroscopy
    43. Physics:Quantum Hydrogen atom
    44. Physics:Quantum number
    45. Physics:Quantum Multi-electron atoms
    46. Physics:Quantum Fine structure
    47. Physics:Quantum Hyperfine structure
    48. Physics:Quantum Isotopic shift
    49. Physics:Quantum defect
    50. Physics:Quantum Zeeman effect
    51. Physics:Quantum Stark effect
    52. Physics:Quantum Spectral lines and series
    53. Physics:Quantum Selection rules
    54. Physics:Quantum Fermi's golden rule
    55. Physics:Quantum beats
    56. Wavefunctions and modes

      A quantum wavefunction showing probability amplitude in space; the square of its magnitude gives the probability density.
      A quantum wavefunction showing probability amplitude in space; the square of its magnitude gives the probability density.
    57. Physics:Quantum Wavefunction
    58. Physics:Quantum Superposition principle
    59. Physics:Quantum Eigenstates and eigenvalues
    60. Physics:Quantum Boundary conditions and quantization
    61. Physics:Quantum Standing waves and modes
    62. Physics:Quantum Normal modes and field quantization
    63. Physics:Number of independent spatial modes in a spherical volume
    64. Physics:Quantum Density of states
    65. Physics:Quantum carpet
    66. Quantum dynamics and evolution

    67. Physics:Quantum Time evolution
    68. Physics:Quantum Schrödinger equation
    69. Physics:Quantum Time-dependent Schrödinger equation
    70. Physics:Quantum Stationary states
    71. Physics:Quantum Perturbation theory
    72. Physics:Quantum Time-dependent perturbation theory
    73. Physics:Quantum Adiabatic theorem
    74. Physics:Quantum Scattering theory
    75. Physics:Quantum S-matrix
    76. Physics:Quantum tunnelling
    77. Physics:Quantum speed limit
    78. Physics:Quantum revival
    79. Physics:Quantum reflection
    80. Physics:Quantum oscillations
    81. Physics:Quantum jump
    82. Physics:Quantum boomerang effect
    83. Physics:Quantum chaos
    84. Measurement and information

    85. Physics:Quantum Measurement theory
    86. Physics:Quantum Measurement operators
    87. Physics:Quantum Projective measurement
    88. Physics:Quantum POVM
    89. Physics:Quantum Weak measurement
    90. Physics:Quantum Measurement collapse
    91. Physics:Quantum entanglement
    92. Physics:Quantum Zeno effect
    93. Physics:Quantum limit
    94. Quantum information and computing

    95. Physics:Quantum information theory
    96. Physics:Quantum Qubit
    97. Physics:Quantum Entanglement
    98. Physics:Quantum Gates and circuits
    99. Physics:Quantum Computing Algorithms in the NISQ Era
    100. Physics:Quantum Noisy Qubits
    101. Physics:Quantum random access code
    102. Physics:Quantum pseudo-telepathy
    103. Physics:Quantum network
    104. Physics:Quantum money
    105. Quantum optics and experiments

      Experimental quantum physics: qubits, dilution refrigerators, quantum communication, and laboratory systems.
      Experimental quantum physics: qubits, dilution refrigerators, quantum communication, and laboratory systems.
    106. Physics:Quantum Nonlinear King plot anomaly in calcium isotope spectroscopy
    107. Physics:Quantum optics beam splitter experiments
    108. Physics:Quantum Ultra fast lasers
    109. Physics:Quantum Experimental quantum physics
    110. Physics:Quantum optics
    111. Template:Quantum optics operators
    112. Open quantum systems

    113. Physics:Quantum Open systems
    114. Physics:Quantum Master equation
    115. Physics:Quantum Lindblad equation
    116. Physics:Quantum Decoherence
    117. Physics:Quantum dissipation
    118. Physics:Quantum Markov semigroup
    119. Physics:Quantum Markovian dynamics
    120. Physics:Quantum Non-Markovian dynamics
    121. Physics:Quantum Trajectories
    122. Quantum field theory

      Structural dependency map of quantum field theory.
    123. Physics:Quantum field theory (QFT) basics
    124. Physics:Quantum field theory (QFT) core
    125. Physics:Quantum Fields and Particles
    126. Physics:Quantum Second quantization
    127. Physics:Quantum Harmonic Oscillator field modes
    128. Physics:Quantum Creation and annihilation operators
    129. Physics:Quantum vacuum fluctuations
    130. Physics:Quantum Propagators in quantum field theory
    131. Physics:Quantum Feynman diagrams
    132. Physics:Quantum Path integral formulation
    133. Physics:Quantum Renormalization in field theory
    134. Physics:Quantum Renormalization group
    135. Physics:Quantum Field Theory Gauge symmetry
    136. Physics:Quantum Non-Abelian gauge theory
    137. Physics:Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
    138. Physics:Quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
    139. Physics:Quantum Electroweak theory
    140. Physics:Quantum Standard Model
    141. Physics:Quantum triviality
    142. Physics:Quantum confinement problem
    143. Statistical mechanics and kinetic theory

    144. Physics:Quantum Statistical mechanics
    145. Physics:Quantum Partition function
    146. Physics:Quantum Distribution functions
    147. Physics:Quantum Liouville equation
    148. Physics:Quantum Kinetic theory
    149. Physics:Quantum Boltzmann equation
    150. Physics:Quantum BBGKY hierarchy
    151. Physics:Quantum Relaxation and thermalization
    152. Physics:Quantum Thermodynamics
    153. Condensed matter and solid-state physics

    154. Physics:Quantum Band structure
    155. Physics:Quantum Fermi surfaces
    156. Physics:Quantum Semiconductor physics
    157. Physics:Quantum Phonons
    158. Physics:Quantum Electron-phonon interaction
    159. Physics:Quantum Superconductivity
    160. Physics:Quantum Topological phases of matter
    161. Physics:Quantum well
    162. Physics:Quantum spin liquid
    163. Physics:Quantum spin Hall effect
    164. Physics:Quantum phase transition
    165. Physics:Quantum critical point
    166. Physics:Quantum dot
    167. Plasma and fusion physics

      Conceptual illustration of plasma physics in a fusion context, showing magnetically confined ionized gas in a tokamak and the collective behavior governed by electromagnetic fields and transport processes.
      Conceptual illustration of plasma physics in a fusion context, showing magnetically confined ionized gas in a tokamak and the collective behavior governed by electromagnetic fields and transport processes.
    168. Physics:Quantum Fusion reactions and Lawson criterion
    169. Physics:Quantum Plasma (fusion context)
    170. Physics:Quantum Magnetic confinement fusion
    171. Physics:Quantum Inertial confinement fusion
    172. Physics:Quantum Plasma instabilities and turbulence
    173. Physics:Quantum Tokamak core plasma
    174. Physics:Quantum Tokamak edge physics and recycling asymmetries
    175. Physics:Quantum Stellarator
    176. Timeline

    177. Physics:Quantum mechanics/Timeline
    178. Physics:Quantum mechanics/Timeline/Pre-quantum era
    179. Physics:Quantum mechanics/Timeline/Old quantum theory
    180. Physics:Quantum mechanics/Timeline/Modern quantum mechanics
    181. Physics:Quantum mechanics/Timeline/Quantum field theory era
    182. Physics:Quantum mechanics/Timeline/Quantum information era
    183. Physics:Quantum mechanics/Timeline/Quantum technology era
    184. Physics:Quantum mechanics/Timeline/Quiz
    185. Advanced and frontier topics

    186. Physics:Quantum topology
    187. Physics:Quantum battery
    188. Physics:Quantum Supersymmetry
    189. Physics:Quantum Black hole thermodynamics
    190. Physics:Quantum Holographic principle
    191. Physics:Quantum gravity
    192. Physics:Quantum De Sitter invariant special relativity
    193. Physics:Quantum Doubly special relativity
    194. Physics:Quantum arithmetic geometry
    195. Physics:Quantum unsolved problems
    196. Physics:Quantum Yang-Mills mass gap
    197. Physics:Quantum gravity problem
    198. Physics:Quantum black hole information paradox
    199. Physics:Quantum dark matter problem
    200. Physics:Quantum neutrino mass problem
    201. Physics:Quantum matter-antimatter asymmetry problem


    See the subpage for a quiz on this topic.

    References and Endnotes

    • Most of the material was adapted from Wikipedia
    1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics
    2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_quantum_theory
    3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_mechanics
    4. This approximation assumes that the speed is much less than the speed of light, i.e. that the system is nonrelativistic.
    5. Historically, even the Compton effect already hinted at the need for a more unified treatment of quantum ideas and relativistic particles.
    6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_quantum_mechanics
    7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect
    8. Taylor, Geoffrey Ingram. "Interference fringes with feeble light." Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 15 (1909).
    9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_model
    10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_scattering
    11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wave
    12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation
    13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rule
    14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davisson%E2%80%93Germer_experiment
    15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle
    16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox
    17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamb_shift
    18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics
    19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation
    20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem
    21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computing
    22. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BB84
    23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
    24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_error_correction
    25. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_teleportation
    26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
    27. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_test_experiments
    28. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_supremacy
    29. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2022/summary/
    30. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_error_correction
    31. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computing
    32. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_technology
    33. Kuhn, T. S. (1978). Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity 1894–1912. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0195023838. 
    34. Taylor, Geoffrey Ingram. "Interference fringes with feeble light." Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 15 (1909).
    35. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
    36. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics
    37. Moore, W. J. (1992). Schrödinger: Life and Thought. Cambridge University Press. p. 220. ISBN 0-521-43767-9. 
    38. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davisson%E2%80%93Germer_experiment
    39. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat
    40. http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100317/full/news.2010.130.html
    41. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamb_shift
    42. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics
    43. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation
    44. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem
    45. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computing
    46. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BB84
    47. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
    48. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_error_correction
    49. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_teleportation
    50. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm
    51. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_test_experiments
    52. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_supremacy
    53. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2022/summary/
    54. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_error_correction
    55. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computing
    56. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_technology
    Author: Harold Foppele