# Astronomy:Primordial black hole

Short description: Hypothetical type of black hole

Primordial black hole (also abbreviated as PBH)[1][2] is a hypothetical type of black hole that formed soon after the Big Bang. In the early universe, high densities and heterogeneous conditions could have led sufficiently dense regions to undergo gravitational collapse, forming black holes. Yakov Borisovich Zel'dovich and Igor Dmitriyevich Novikov in 1966 first proposed the existence of such black holes.[3] The theory behind their origins was first studied in depth by Stephen Hawking in 1971.[4] Since primordial black holes did not form from stellar gravitational collapse, their masses can be far below stellar mass (c. 2×1030 kg).

## Theoretical history

Depending on the model, primordial black holes could have initial masses ranging from 10−8 kg [5](the so-called Planck relics) to more than thousands of solar masses. However, primordial black holes originally having mass lower than 1011 kg would not have survived to the present due to Hawking radiation, which causes complete evaporation in a time much shorter than the age of the Universe. Primordial black holes are non-baryonic[6] and as such are plausible dark matter candidates.[7][8][9][10][11] Primordial black holes are also good candidates for being the seeds of the supermassive black holes at the center of massive galaxies, as well as of intermediate-mass black holes.[12]

Primordial black holes belong to the class of massive compact halo objects (MACHOs). They are naturally a good dark matter candidate: they are (nearly) collision-less and stable (if sufficiently massive), they have non-relativistic velocities, and they form very early in the history of the Universe (typically less than one second after the Big Bang).[13] Nevertheless, critics maintain that tight limits on their abundance have been set up from various astrophysical and cosmological observations, which would exclude that they contribute significantly to dark matter over most of the plausible mass range.[14] However, new research has provided for the possibility again, whereby these black holes would sit in clusters with a 30-solar-mass primordial black hole at the center.[15][16]

In March 2016, one month after the announcement of the detection by Advanced LIGO/VIRGO of gravitational waves emitted by the merging of two 30 solar mass black holes (about 6×1031 kg), three groups of researchers proposed independently that the detected black holes had a primordial origin.[17][18][19][20] Two of the groups found that the merging rates inferred by LIGO are consistent with a scenario in which all the dark matter is made of primordial black holes, if a non-negligible fraction of them are somehow clustered within halos such as faint dwarf galaxies or globular clusters, as expected by the standard theory of cosmic structure formation. The third group claimed that these merging rates are incompatible with an all-dark-matter scenario and that primordial black holes could only contribute to less than one percent of the total dark matter. The unexpected large mass of the black holes detected by LIGO has strongly revived interest in primordial black holes with masses in the range of 1 to 100 solar masses. It is however still debated whether this range is excluded or not by other observations, such as the absence of micro-lensing of stars,[21] the cosmic microwave background anisotropies, the size of faint dwarf galaxies, and the absence of correlation between X-ray and radio sources towards the galactic center.

In May 2016, Alexander Kashlinsky suggested that the observed spatial correlations in the unresolved gamma-ray and X-ray background radiations could be due to primordial black holes with similar masses, if their abundance is comparable to that of dark matter.[22]

In April 2019, a study was published suggesting this hypothesis may be a dead end. An international team of researchers has put a theory speculated by the late Stephen Hawking to its most rigorous test to date, and their results have ruled out the possibility that primordial black holes smaller than a tenth of a millimeter (7 × 1022 kg) make up most of dark matter.[23][24]

In August 2019, a study was published opening up the possibility of making up all dark matter with asteroid-mass primordial black holes (3.5 × 10−17 – 4 × 10−12 solar masses, or 7.0 × 1013 – 8 × 1018 kg).[25]

In September 2019, a report by James Unwin and Jakub Scholtz proposed the possibility of a primordial black hole (PBH) with mass 5–15 Template:M+ (Earth masses), about the diameter of a tennis ball, existing in the extended Kuiper Belt to explain the orbital anomalies that are theorized to be the result of a 9th planet in the solar system.[26][27]

## Formation

Formation of the universe with and without primordial black holes

Primordial black holes could have formed in the very early Universe (less than one second after the Big Bang), during the so-called radiation dominated era. The essential ingredient for the formation of a primordial black hole is a fluctuation in the density of the Universe, inducing its gravitational collapse. One typically requires density contrasts $\displaystyle{ \delta \rho / \rho \sim 0.1 }$ (where $\displaystyle{ \rho }$ is the density of the Universe) to form a black hole.[28] There are several mechanisms able to produce such inhomogeneities in the context of cosmic inflation (in hybrid inflation models, for example axion inflation), reheating, or cosmological phase transitions.

## Observational limits and detection strategies

A variety of observations have been interpreted to place limits on the abundance and mass of primordial black holes:

• Lensing of gamma-ray bursts: Compact objects can induce a change in the luminosity of gamma-ray bursts when passing close to their line-of-sight, through the gravitational lensing effect. The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor experiment found that primordial black holes cannot contribute importantly to the dark matter within the mass range 5 x 1014 – 1017 kg.[30] A re-analysis, however, has removed this limit after properly taking into account the extended nature of the source as well as wave optics effects.[31]
• Capture of primordial black holes by neutron stars: If primordial black holes with masses between 1015 kg and 1022 kg had abundances comparable to that of dark matter, neutron stars in globular clusters should have captured some of them, leading to the rapid destruction of the star.[32] The observation of neutron stars in globular clusters can thus be used to set a limit on primordial black hole abundance. However, a detailed study of the capture dynamics has challenged this limit and led to its removal.[25]
• Survival of white dwarfs: If a primordial black hole passes through a C/O white dwarf, it may ignite the carbon and subsequently produce a runaway explosion. The observed white dwarf mass distribution can thus provide a limit on primordial black hole abundance. Primordial black holes in the range of ~1016 – 1017 kg have been ruled out for being a dominant constituent of the local dark matter density. Furthermore, the runaway explosion may be seen as a Type Ia supernova. Primordial black holes in the mass range 1017–1019  kg are limited by the observed supernova rate, though these bounds are subject to astrophysical uncertainties.[33] A detailed study with hydrodynamic simulations have challenged these limits and led to the re-opening of these mass ranges.[25]
• Micro-lensing of stars: If a primordial black hole passes between us and a distant star, it induces a magnification of these stars due to the gravitational lensing effect. By monitoring the magnitude of stars in the Magellanic Clouds, the EROS and MACHO surveys have put a limit on the abundance of primordial black holes in the range 1023 – 1031 kg. By observing stars in the Andromeda Galaxy (M31), the Subaru/HSC have put a limit on the abundance of primordial black holes in the range 1019 - 1024 kg. According to these surveys, primordial black holes within this range cannot constitute an important fraction of the dark matter.[34][35][24] However, these limits are model-dependent. It has been also argued that if primordial black holes are regrouped in dense halos, the micro-lensing constraints are then naturally evaded.[18] The micro-lensing technique suffers from the finite-size source effect and the diffraction when probing primordial black holes with smaller masses. Scaling laws were derived to demonstrate that the optical micro-lensing is unlikely to limit the abundance of primordial black holes with masses below ~1018 kg in a foreseeable future.[25]
• Micro-lensing of Ia supernovae: Primordial black holes with masses larger than 1028 kg would magnify distant type Ia supernova (or any other standard candle of known luminosity) due to gravitational lensing. These effects would be apparent if primordial black holes were a significant contribution to the dark matter density, which is constrained by current data sets.[36][37]
• Temperature anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background: Accretion of matter onto primordial black holes in the early Universe should lead to energy injection in the medium that affects the recombination history of the Universe. This effect induces signatures in the statistical distribution of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. The Planck observations of the CMB exclude that primordial black holes with masses in the range 100 – 104 solar masses contribute importantly to the dark matter,[38] at least in the simplest conservative model. It is still debated whether the constraints are stronger or weaker in more realistic or complex scenarios.
• Gamma-ray signatures from annihilating dark matter: If the dark matter in the Universe is in the form of weakly interacting massive particles or WIMPs, primordial black holes would accrete a halo of WIMPs around them in the early universe.[39] The annihilation of WIMPs in the halo leads to a signal in the gamma-ray spectrum which is potentially detectable by dedicated instruments such as the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope.[40]

At the time of the detection by LIGO of the gravitational waves emitted during the final coalescence of two 30 solar mass black holes, the mass range between 10 and 100 solar masses was still only poorly constrained. Since then, new observations have been claimed to close this window, at least for models in which the primordial black holes have all the same mass:

• from the absence of X-ray and optical correlations in point sources observed in the direction of the galactic center.[41]
• from the dynamical heating of dwarf galaxies[42]
• from the observation of a central star cluster in the Eridanus II dwarf galaxy (but these constraints can be relaxed if Eridanus II owns a central intermediate mass black hole, which is suggested by some observations).[43] If primordial black holes exhibit a broad mass distribution, those constraints could nevertheless still be evaded.
• from the gravitational micro-lensing of distant quasars by closer galaxies, allowing only 20% of the galactic matter to be in the form of compact objects with stellar masses, a value consistent with the expected stellar population.[44]
• from micro-lensing of distant stars by galaxy clusters, suggesting that the fraction of dark matter in the form of primordial black holes with masses comparable to those found by LIGO must be less than 10%.[45]

In the future, new limits will be set up by various observations:

• The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) radio telescope will probe the effects of primordial black holes on the reionization history of the Universe, due to energy injection into the intergalactic medium, induced by matter accretion onto primordial black holes.[46]
• LIGO, VIRGO and future gravitational waves detectors will detect new black hole merging events, from which one could reconstruct the mass distribution of primordial black holes.[18] These detectors could allow distinguishing unambiguously between primordial or stellar origins if merging events involving black holes with a mass lower than 1.4 solar mass are detected. Another way would be to measure the large orbital eccentricity of primordial black hole binaries.[47]
• Gravitational wave detectors, such as the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) and pulsar timing arrays will also probe the stochastic background of gravitational waves emitted by primordial black hole binaries, when they are still orbiting relatively far from each other.[48]
• New detections of faint dwarf galaxies, and the observations of their central star cluster, could be used to test the hypothesis that these dark matter-dominated structures contain primordial black holes in abundance.
• Monitoring star positions and velocities within the Milky Way could be used to detect the influence of a nearby primordial black hole.
• It has been suggested[49][50] that a small black hole passing through the Earth would produce a detectable acoustic signal. Because of its tiny diameter, large mass compared to a nucleon, and relatively high speed, such primordial black holes would simply transit Earth virtually unimpeded with only a few impacts on nucleons, exiting the planet with no ill effects.
• Another way to detect primordial black holes could be by watching for ripples on the surfaces of stars. If the black hole passed through a star, its density would cause observable vibrations.[51][52]
• Monitoring quasars in the microwave wavelength and detection of the wave optics feature of gravitational microlensing by the primordial black holes.[53]
• The other observational consequence would be the collision of primordial blackholes with Earth and trapping inside it that is studied by S. Rahvar in 2021. Considering the whole dark matter is made of primordial blackholes with the mass function allowed in the observational range, the probability of this event is much smaller than the age of the Universe. [54]

## Implications

Problems for which primordial black holes have suggested as a solution include the dark matter problem, the cosmological domain wall problem[55] and the cosmological monopole problem.[56] Since primordial black holes do not necessarily have to be small (they can have any size), they may have contributed to the later formation of galaxies.

Even if they do not solve these problems, the low number of primordial black holes (as of 2010, only two intermediate mass black holes were confirmed) aids cosmologists by putting constraints on the spectrum of density fluctuations in the early universe.

## String theory

Main page: Physics:String theory

General relativity predicts the smallest primordial black holes would have evaporated by now, but if there were a fourth spatial dimension – as predicted by string theory – it would affect how gravity acts on small scales and "slow down the evaporation quite substantially".[57] This could mean there are several thousand black holes in our galaxy. To test this theory, scientists will use the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope which was put in orbit by NASA on June 11, 2008. If they observe specific small interference patterns within gamma-ray bursts, it could be the first indirect evidence for primordial black holes and string theory.

## References

1. Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate - Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
2. [1] - Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
3. Zel'dovitch & Novikov (14 March 1966). "The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded During Expansion and the Hot Cosmological MOdel". Soviet Astronomy 10 (4): 602–603. Bibcode1966AZh....43..758Z.
4. Hawking, S (1971). "Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 152: 75. doi:10.1093/mnras/152.1.75. Bibcode1971MNRAS.152...75H.
5. Carr, B.J.; Hawking, S.W. (2004). "Black holes in the early Universe". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 168 (2): 399–416. doi:10.1093/mnras/168.2.399. Bibcode1974MNRAS.168..399C.
6. Overduin, J. M.; Wesson, P. S. (November 2004). "Dark Matter and Background Light". Physics Reports 402 (5–6): 267–406. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.07.006. Bibcode2004PhR...402..267O.
7. Frampton, Paul H.; Kawasaki, Masahiro; Takahashi, Fuminobu; Yanagida, Tsutomu T. (22 April 2010). "Primordial Black Holes as All Dark Matter". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2010 (4): 023. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/04/023. ISSN 1475-7516. Bibcode2010JCAP...04..023F.
8. Espinosa, J. R.; Racco, D.; Riotto, A. (23 March 2018). "A Cosmological Signature of the Standard Model Higgs Vacuum Instability: Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter". Physical Review Letters 120 (12): 121301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.121301. PMID 29694085. Bibcode2018PhRvL.120l1301E.
9. Clesse, Sebastien; García-Bellido, Juan (2018). "Seven Hints for Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter". Physics of the Dark Universe 22: 137–146. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018.08.004. Bibcode2018PDU....22..137C.
10. Lacki, Brian C.; Beacom, John F. (12 August 2010). "Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Almost All or Almost Nothing" (in en). The Astrophysical Journal 720 (1): L67–L71. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L67. ISSN 2041-8205. Bibcode2010ApJ...720L..67L.
11. Kashlinsky, A. (23 May 2016). "LIGO gravitational wave detection, primordial black holes and the near-IR cosmic infrared background anisotropies". The Astrophysical Journal 823 (2): L25. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L25. ISSN 2041-8213. Bibcode2016ApJ...823L..25K.
12. Clesse, S.; Garcia-Bellido, J. (2015). "Massive Primordial Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and the seeds of Galaxies". Physical Review D 92 (2): 023524. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.023524. Bibcode2015PhRvD..92b3524C.
13. Ali-Haïmoud, Yacine; Kovetz, Ely D.; Kamionkowski, Marc (2017-12-19). "The merger rate of primordial-black-hole binaries". Physical Review D 96 (12): 123523. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.123523. ISSN 2470-0010. Bibcode2017PhRvD..96l3523A.
14. Jedamzik, Karsten (2020-09-14). "Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter and the LIGO/Virgo observations". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (9): 022. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/09/022. ISSN 1475-7516. Bibcode2020JCAP...09..022J.
15. Jedamzik, Karsten (September 2020). "Primordial black hole dark matter and the LIGO/Virgo observations" (in en). Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (9): 022. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/09/022. ISSN 1475-7516. Bibcode2020JCAP...09..022J.
16. Bird, S.; Cholis, I. (2016). "Did LIGO Detect Dark Matter?". Physical Review Letters 116 (20): 201301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.201301. PMID 27258861. Bibcode2016PhRvL.116t1301B.
17. Clesse, S.; Garcia-Bellido, J. (2017). "The clustering of massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Measuring their mass distribution with Advanced LIGO". Physics of the Dark Universe 10 (2016): 142–147. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2016.10.002. Bibcode2017PDU....15..142C.
18. Sasaki, M.; Suyama, T.; Tanaki, T. (2016). "Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914". Physical Review Letters 117 (6): 061101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.061101. PMID 27541453. Bibcode2016PhRvL.117f1101S.
19. Khalouei, E.; Ghodsi, H.; Rahvar, S.; Abedi, J. (2021-04-02). "Possibility of primordial black holes as the source of gravitational wave events in the advanced LIGO detector". Physical Review D 103 (8): 084001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084001. Bibcode2021PhRvD.103h4001K.
20. Kashlinsky, A. (2016). "LIGO gravitational wave detection, primordial black holes and the near-IR cosmic infrared background anisotropies". The Astrophysical Journal 823 (2): L25. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L25. Bibcode2016ApJ...823L..25K.
21. "Dark matter is not made up of tiny black holes". ScienceDaily. 2 April 2019.
22. Niikura, H. et al. (2019). "Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations". Nature Astronomy 3 (6): 524–534. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0723-1. Bibcode2019NatAs...3..524N.
23. Montero-Camacho, Paulo; Fang, Xiao; Vasquez, Gabriel; Silva, Makana; Hirata, Christopher M. (2019-08-23). "Revisiting constraints on asteroid-mass primordial black holes as dark matter candidates". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (8): 031. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/031. ISSN 1475-7516. Bibcode2019JCAP...08..031M.
24. Schultz, J.; Unwin, J. (2019). "﻿What if Planet 9 is a Primordial Black Hole?﻿". High Energy Physics - Phenomenology.
25. Anderson, D.; Hunt, B. (5 December 2019). "Why astrophysicists think there's a black hole in our solar system".
26. Harada, T.; Yoo, C.-M.; Khori, K. (2013). "Threshold of primordial black hole formation". Physical Review D 88 (8): 084051. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.084051. Bibcode2013PhRvD..88h4051H.
27. Hawking, S.W. (1977). "The quantum mechanics of black holes". Scientific American 236: 34–40. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0177-34. Bibcode1977SciAm.236a..34H.
28. Barnacka, A.; Glicenstein, J.; Moderski, R. (2012). "New constraints on primordial black holes abundance from femtolensing of gamma-ray bursts". Physical Review D 86 (4): 043001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.043001. Bibcode2012PhRvD..86d3001B.
29. Katz, Andrey; Kopp, Joachim; Sibiryakov, Sergey; Xue, Wei (2018-12-05). "Femtolensing by dark matter revisited". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (12): 005. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/12/005. ISSN 1475-7516. Bibcode2018JCAP...12..005K.
30. Capela, Fabio; Pshirkov, Maxim; Tinyakov, Peter (2013). "Constraints on primordial black holes as dark matter candidates from capture by neutron stars". Physical Review D 87 (12): 123524. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.123524. Bibcode2013PhRvD..87l3524C.
31. Graham, Peter W.; Rajendran, Surjeet; Varela, Jaime (2015-09-09). "Dark matter triggers of supernovae" (in en). Physical Review D 92 (6): 063007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.063007. ISSN 1550-7998. Bibcode2015PhRvD..92f3007G.
32. Tisserand, P.; Le Guillou, L.; Afonso, C.; Albert, J. N.; Andersen, J.; Ansari, R.; Aubourg, E.; Bareyre, P. et al. (2007). "Limits on the Macho Content of the Galactic Halo from the EROS-2 Survey of the Magellanic Clouds". Astronomy and Astrophysics 469 (2): 387–404. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066017. Bibcode2007A&A...469..387T.
33. Collaboration, EROS; Collaboration, MACHO; Alves, D.; Ansari, R.; Aubourg, É.; Axelrod, T. S.; Bareyre, P.; Beaulieu, J.-Ph. et al. (1998). "EROS and MACHO Combined Limits on Planetary Mass Dark Matter in the Galactic Halo". The Astrophysical Journal 499 (1): L9. doi:10.1086/311355. Bibcode1998ApJ...499L...9A.
34. Zumalacárregui, Miguel; Seljak, Uroš (2018-10-01). "Limits on Stellar-Mass Compact Objects as Dark Matter from Gravitational Lensing of Type Ia Supernovae". Physical Review Letters 121 (14): 141101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.141101. PMID 30339429. Bibcode2018PhRvL.121n1101Z.
35. "Black holes ruled out as universe's missing dark matter" (in en-US). Berkeley News. 2018-10-02.
36. Ali-Haimoud, Y.; Kamionkowski, M. (2017). "Cosmic microwave background limits on accreting primordial black holes". Physical Review D 95 (4): 043534. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043534. Bibcode2017PhRvD..95d3534A.
37. Eroshenko, Yuri (2016). "Dark Matter Density Spikes around Primordial Black Holes". Astronomy Letters 42 (6): 347–356. doi:10.1134/S1063773716060013. Bibcode2016AstL...42..347E.
38. Boucenna, Sofiane M.; Kühnel, Florian; Ohlsson, Tommy; Visinelli, Luca (2018). "Novel Constraints on Mixed Dark-Matter Scenarios of Primordial Black Holes and WIMPs". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 1807 (7): 003. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/003. Bibcode2018JCAP...07..003B.
39. Gaggero, D.; Bertone, G.; Calore, F.; Connors, R.; Lovell, L.; Markoff, S.; Storm, E. (2017). "Searching for primordial black holes in the X-ray and radio sky". Physical Review Letters 118 (24): 241101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.241101. PMID 28665632. Bibcode2017PhRvL.118x1101G.
40. Green, A.M. (2016). "Microlensing and dynamical constraints on primordial black hole dark matter with an extended mass function". Phys. Rev. D 94 (6): 063530. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.063530. Bibcode2016PhRvD..94f3530G.
41. Li, T. S.; Simon, J. D.; Drlica-Wagner, A.; Bechtol, K.; Wang, M. Y.; García-Bellido, J.; Frieman, J.; Marshall, J. L. et al. (2016). "Farthest Neighbor: The Distant Milky Way Satellite Eridanus II". The Astrophysical Journal 838 (1): 8. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6113. Bibcode2017ApJ...838....8L.
42. Mediavilla, E.; Jimenez-Vicente, J.; Munoz, J. A.; Vives Arias, H.; Calderon-Infante, J. (2017). "Limits on the Mass and Abundance of Primordial Black Holes from Quasar Gravitational Microlensing". The Astrophysical Journal 836 (2): L18. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa5dab. Bibcode2017ApJ...836L..18M.
43. Diego, Jose M. (2017). "Dark matter under the microscope: Constraining compact dark matter with caustic crossing events". The Astrophysical Journal 857 (1): 25. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab617. Bibcode2018ApJ...857...25D.
44. Tashiro, H.; Sugiyama, N. (2012). "The effect of primordial black holes on 21 cm fluctuations". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (4): 3001. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1493. Bibcode2013MNRAS.435.3001T.
45. Cholis, I.; Kovetz, E.D.; Ali-Haimoud, Y.; Bird, S.; Kamionkowski, M.; Munoz, J.; Raccanelli, A. (2016). "Orbital eccentricities in primordial black hole binaries". Physical Review D 94 (8): 084013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.084013. Bibcode2016PhRvD..94h4013C.
46. Clesse, Sebastien; Garcia-Bellido, Juan (2016). "Detecting the gravitational wave background from primordial black hole dark matter". Physics of the Dark Universe 18: 105–114. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2017.10.001. Bibcode2017PDU....18..105C.
47. Khriplovich, I. B.; Pomeransky, A. A.; Produit, N.; Ruban, G. Yu. (2008). "Can one detect passage of a small black hole through the Earth?". Physical Review D 77 (6): 064017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.064017. Bibcode2008PhRvD..77f4017K.
48. I. B. Khriplovich, A. A. Pomeransky, N. Produit and G. Yu. Ruban, Passage of small black hole through the Earth. Is it detectable?, preprint
49. Kesden, Michael; Hanasoge, Shravan (2011). "Transient Solar Oscillations Driven by Primordial Black Holes". Physical Review Letters 107 (11): 111101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.111101. PMID 22026654. Bibcode2011PhRvL.107k1101K.
50. Naderi, Tayebeh; Mehrabi, Ahmad; Rahvar, Sohrab (2018). "Primordial black hole detection through diffractive microlensing". Physical Review D 97 (10): 103507. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103507. Bibcode2018PhRvD..97j3507N.
51. Rahvar, Sohrab (2021). "Possibility of Primordial black holes Collision with Earth and the Consequences of this Collision". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 507 (1): 914–918. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2239.
52. D. Stojkovic; K. Freese; G. D. Starkman (2005). "Holes in the walls: primordial black holes as a solution to the cosmological domain wall problem". Phys. Rev. D 72 (4): 045012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.045012. Bibcode2005PhRvD..72d5012S.  preprint
53. D. Stojkovic; K. Freese (2005). "A black hole solution to the cosmological monopole problem". Phys. Lett. B 606 (3–4): 251–257. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.019. Bibcode2005PhLB..606..251S.  preprint
54. McKee, Maggie. (2006) NewScientistSpace.com – Satellite could open door on extra dimension