Biology:Megafauna

From HandWiki

In zoology, megafauna (from Greek μέγας megas 'large' and Neo-Latin fauna 'animal life') are large animals. The precise definition of the term varies widely, though a common threshold is approximately 45 kilograms (99 lb), this lower end being centered on humans, with other thresholds being more relative to the sizes of animals in an ecosystem,[1] the spectrum of lower-end thresholds ranging from 10 kilograms (22 lb) to 1,000 kilograms (2,200 lb). Large body size is generally associated with other traits, such as having a slow rate of reproduction and, in large herbivores, reduced or negligible adult mortality from predation.

Megafauna species have considerable effects on their local environment, including the suppression of the growth of woody vegetation and a consequent reduction in wildfire frequency. Megafauna also play a role in regulating and stabilizing the abundance of smaller animals.

During the Pleistocene, megafauna were diverse across the globe, with most continental ecosystems exhibiting similar or greater species richness in megafauna as compared to ecosystems in Africa today. During the Late Pleistocene, particularly from around 50,000 years ago onwards, most large mammal species became extinct, including 80% of all mammals greater than 1,000 kilograms (2,200 lb), while small animals were largely unaffected. This pronouncedly size-biased extinction is otherwise unprecedented in the geological record. Humans and climatic change have been implicated by most authors as the likely causes, though the relative importance of either factor has been the subject of significant controversy.

History

One of the earliest occurrences of the term "megafauna" is Alfred Russel Wallace's 1876 work The geographical distribution of animals. He described the animals as "the hugest, and fiercest, and strangest forms". In the 20th and 21st centuries, the term usually refers to large animals. There are variations in thresholds used to define megafauna as a whole or certain groups of megafauna. Many scientific literature adopt Paul S. Martin's proposed threshold of 45 kilograms (99 lb) to classify animals as megafauna. However, for freshwater species, 30 kilograms (66 lb) is the preferred threshold. Some scientists define herbivorous terrestrial megafauna as having a weight exceeding 100 kilograms (220 lb), and terrestrial carnivorous megafauna as more than 15 kilograms (33 lb). Additionally, Owen-Smith coined the term megaherbivore to describe herbivores that weighed over 1,000 kilograms (2,200 lb), which has seen some use by other researchers.[2]

Among living animals, the term megafauna is most commonly used for the largest extant terrestrial mammals, which include (but are not limited to) elephants, giraffes, hippopotamuses, rhinoceroses, and larger bovines. Of these five categories of large herbivores, only bovines are presently found outside of Africa and Asia, but all the others were formerly more wide-ranging, with their ranges and populations continually shrinking and decreasing over time. Wild equines are another example of megafauna, but their current ranges are largely restricted to the Old World, specifically in Africa and Asia. Megafaunal species may be categorized according to their dietary type: megaherbivores (e.g., elephants), megacarnivores (e.g., lions), and megaomnivores (e.g., bears).[3][4]

Definition

Since the first time the term "megafauna" was proposed, there has not been a succinct definition used throughout the scientific community. A study in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences attempted to categorize the uses in order to further the understandings of what megafauna are in 2020. After considering 276 pieces of scientific literature with overlapping subjects, they determined two typical uses for the word: "keystone megafauna" and "functional megafauna," with a subcategory of "apex megafauna."[1] These were subsequently defined based off of how the term was referred and defined within those previously written studies in order to accurately reflect where the definition stands in the science community today. Within each of these definitions, there is no set minimum for the weight of the species that defines a megafauna, as it will vary between habitats and individuals.

Keystone megafauna

The term keystone species can be defined as a population in a habitat whose activity meets a disproportional amount of needs that the rest of the species depend on, first defined by Robert T. Paine in 1969.[5] It can be further defined by the effects had on the loss of these species within their environment, which could unravel the natural ecological processes resulting in additional losses. Keystone megafauna are species with this effect, strengthened by their larger mass and range. To decipher a keystone megafauna between the other definitions, it depends on the individual species size range combined with the implications it has for the function of the habitat. Although small species can be keystones, they would not fit this definition.[2]

Functional megafauna

Functional megafauna refers to the species that are currently seen as the largest in their taxonomical group and that tend to have identifiable advantages in their habitat due to their size. The term "functional" in this case refers to the traits that contribute to the ability allowing these species to use their size.[6] The actual mass minimum with this definition will vary between the individuals SPECIFY classification, like how herbivores typically reach around 1000kg to be considered whereas carnivores need only be around 13-16kg. Apex megafauna is an additional term to be used for these species within this category.[2]

Apex megafauna

"Apex" is a term usually used to describe apex predators. Apex predators are carnivorous species who dominate the habitat they reside in, being at the top of the food chain and having large hunting ranges.[7] The difference for these megafauna species, humans for example, lies in their unlikeliness to become prey which increases significantly into adulthood, whether it is because of predation status or their size.[2]  Large animals that are not predators can fit into this apex ideation because, similarly, their range is more influenced by the capacity of the habitat rather than the typical phenomenon of being hunted for population control.

Ecological strategy

Megafauna tend to display the ecological role of K-strategists, with high longevity, slow population growth rates, low mortality rates, and (at least for the largest) few or no natural predators capable of killing adults.[8][2] These characteristics, although not exclusive to such megafauna, make them vulnerable to human overexploitation, in part because of their slow population recovery rates.[9][10]

Megafauna are considerable contributors to the environments they populate in. The lasting effects of megafauna have been studied, such as Enquist's paper that considered the results from notable megafauna extinction events. During the Anthropocene, many larger species declined in populations (flora and fauna both), which was found to have profound downward effects on the total biosphere activity.[11] This can be attributed to losing these species that assist in many natural processes, like creating new soil, cycling carbon, and population control of the other species. According to simulations and studies done based on current global conditions, removing megafauna from a habitat would leave niches to be filled by smaller plants and animals, upsetting the stable chain of systems that is currently functioning.[11]

Evolution of large body size

One observation that has been made about the evolution of larger body size is that rapid rates of increase that are often seen over relatively short time intervals are not sustainable over much longer time periods. In an examination of mammal body mass changes over time, the maximum increase possible in a given time interval was found to scale with the interval length raised to the 0.25 power.[12] This is thought to reflect the emergence, during a trend of increasing maximum body size, of a series of anatomical, physiological, environmental, genetic and other constraints that must be overcome by evolutionary innovations before further size increases are possible. A strikingly faster rate of change was found for large decreases in body mass, such as may be associated with the phenomenon of insular dwarfism. When normalized to generation length, the maximum rate of body mass decrease was found to be over 30 times greater than the maximum rate of body mass increase for a ten-fold change.[12]

In terrestrial mammals

Large terrestrial mammals compared in size to one of the largest sauropod dinosaurs, Patagotitan

Subsequent to the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event that eliminated the non-avian dinosaurs about 66 Ma (million years) ago, terrestrial mammals underwent a nearly exponential increase in body size as they diversified to occupy the ecological niches left vacant. Starting from just a few kg before the event, maximum size had reached ~50 kilograms (110 lb) a few million years later, and ~750 kilograms (1,650 lb) by the end of the Paleocene. This trend of increasing body mass appears to level off about 40 Ma ago (in the late Eocene), suggesting that physiological or ecological constraints had been reached, after an increase in body mass of over three orders of magnitude.[13] However, when considered from the standpoint of rate of size increase per generation, the exponential increase is found to have continued until the appearance of Indricotherium 30 Ma ago. (Since generation time scales with body mass0.259, increasing generation times with increasing size cause the log mass vs. time plot to curve downward from a linear fit.)[12]

Megaherbivores eventually attained a body mass of over 10,000 kilograms (22,000 lb). The largest of these, indricotheres and proboscids, have been hindgut fermenters, which are believed to have an advantage over foregut fermenters in terms of being able to accelerate gastrointestinal transit in order to accommodate very large food intakes.[14] A similar trend emerges when rates of increase of maximum body mass per generation for different mammalian clades are compared (using rates averaged over macroevolutionary time scales). Among terrestrial mammals, the fastest rates of increase of body mass0.259 vs. time (in Ma) occurred in perissodactyls (a slope of 2.1), followed by rodents (1.2) and proboscids (1.1), all of which are hindgut fermenters. The rate of increase for artiodactyls (0.74) was about a third of the perissodactyls. The rate for carnivorans (0.65) was slightly lower yet, while primates, perhaps constrained by their arboreal habits, had the lowest rate (0.39) among the mammalian groups studied.[12]

Terrestrial mammalian carnivores from several eutherian groups (the artiodactyl Andrewsarchus – formerly considered a mesonychid, the oxyaenid Sarkastodon, and the carnivorans Amphicyon and Arctodus) all reached a maximum size of about 1,000 kilograms (2,200 lb)[13] (the carnivoran Arctotherium and the hyaenodontid Simbakubwa may have been somewhat larger). The largest known metatherian carnivore, Proborhyaena gigantea, apparently reached 600 kilograms (1,300 lb), also close to this limit.[15] A similar theoretical maximum size for mammalian carnivores has been predicted based on the metabolic rate of mammals, the energetic cost of obtaining prey, and the maximum estimated rate coefficient of prey intake.[16] It has also been suggested that maximum size for mammalian carnivores is constrained by the stress the humerus can withstand at top running speed.[15]

Analysis of the variation of maximum body size over the last 40 Ma suggests that decreasing temperature and increasing continental land area are associated with increasing maximum body size. The former correlation would be consistent with Bergmann's rule,[17] and might be related to the thermoregulatory advantage of large body mass in cool climates,[13] better ability of larger organisms to cope with seasonality in food supply,[17] or other factors;[17] the latter correlation could be explained in terms of range and resource limitations.[13] However, the two parameters are interrelated (due to sea level drops accompanying increased glaciation), making the driver of the trends in maximum size more difficult to identify.[13]

In marine mammals

Baleen whale comparative sizes

Since tetrapods (first reptiles, later mammals) returned to the sea in the Late Permian, they have dominated the top end of the marine body size range, due to the more efficient intake of oxygen possible using lungs.[18][19] The ancestors of cetaceans are believed to have been the semiaquatic pakicetids, no larger than dogs, of about 53 million years (Ma) ago.[20] By 40 Ma ago, cetaceans had attained a length of 20 m (66 ft) or more in Basilosaurus, an elongated, serpentine whale that differed from modern whales in many respects and was not ancestral to them. Following this, the evolution of large body size in cetaceans appears to have come to a temporary halt and then to have backtracked, although the available fossil records are limited. However, in the period from 31 Ma ago (in the Oligocene) to the present, cetaceans underwent a significantly more rapid sustained increase in body mass (a rate of increase in body mass0.259 of a factor of 3.2 per million years) than achieved by any group of terrestrial mammals.[12] This trend led to the largest animal of all time, the modern blue whale. Several reasons for the more rapid evolution of large body size in cetaceans are possible. Fewer biomechanical constraints on increases in body size may be associated with suspension in water as opposed to standing against the force of gravity, and with swimming movements as opposed to terrestrial locomotion. Also, the greater heat capacity and thermal conductivity of water compared to air may increase the thermoregulatory advantage of large body size in marine endotherms, although diminishing returns apply.[12]

Among the toothed whales, maximum body size appears to be limited by food availability. Larger size, as in sperm and beaked whales, facilitates deeper diving to access relatively easily-caught, large cephalopod prey in a less competitive environment. Compared to odontocetes, the efficiency of baleen whales' filter feeding scales more favorably with increasing size when planktonic food is dense, making larger sizes more advantageous. The lunge feeding technique of rorquals appears to be more energy efficient than the ram feeding of balaenid whales; the latter technique is used with less dense and patchy plankton.[21] The cooling trend in Earth's recent history may have generated more localities of high plankton abundance via wind-driven upwellings, facilitating the evolution of gigantic whales.[21]

Cetaceans are not the only marine mammals to reach tremendous sizes.[22] The largest mammal carnivorans of all time are marine pinnipeds, the largest of which is the southern elephant seal, which can reach more than 6 m (20 ft) in length and weigh up to 5,000 kg (11,000 lb). Other large pinnipeds include the northern elephant seal at 4,000 kg (8,800 lb), walrus at 2,000 kg (4,400 lb), and Steller sea lion at 1,135 kg (2,502 lb).[23][24] The sirenians are another group of marine mammals which adapted to fully aquatic life around the same time as the cetaceans did. Sirenians are closely related to elephants. The largest sirenian was the Steller's sea cow, which reached up to 10 m (33 ft) in length and weighed 8,000 to 10,000 kg (18,000 to 22,000 lb), and was hunted to extinction in the 18th century.[25]

In flightless birds

A size comparison between a human and 4 moa species:
1. Dinornis novaezealandiae
2. Emeus crassus
3. Anomalopteryx didiformis
4. Dinornis robustus

Because of the small initial size of all mammals following the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs, nonmammalian vertebrates had a roughly ten-million-year-long window of opportunity (during the Paleocene) for evolution of gigantism without much competition.[26] During this interval, apex predator niches were often occupied by reptiles, such as terrestrial crocodilians (e.g. Pristichampsus), large snakes (e.g. Titanoboa) or varanid lizards, or by flightless birds[13] (e.g. Paleopsilopterus in South America). This is also the period when megafaunal flightless herbivorous gastornithid birds evolved in the Northern Hemisphere, while flightless paleognaths evolved to large size on Gondwanan land masses and Europe. Gastornithids and at least one lineage of flightless paleognath birds originated in Europe, both lineages dominating niches for large herbivores while mammals remained below 45 kilograms (99 lb) (in contrast with other landmasses like North America and Asia, which saw the earlier evolution of larger mammals) and were the largest European tetrapods in the Paleocene.[27]

Flightless paleognaths, termed ratites, have traditionally been viewed as representing a lineage separate from that of their small flighted relatives, the Neotropic tinamous. However, recent genetic studies have found that tinamous nest well within the ratite tree, and are the sister group of the extinct moa of New Zealand.[26][28][29] Similarly, the small kiwi of New Zealand have been found to be the sister group of the extinct elephant birds of Madagascar.[26] These findings indicate that flightlessness and gigantism arose independently multiple times among ratites via parallel evolution.[30]

Predatory megafaunal flightless birds were often able to compete with mammals in the early Cenozoic. Later in the Cenozoic, however, they were displaced by advanced carnivorans and died out. In North America, the bathornithids Paracrax and Bathornis were apex predators but became extinct by the Early Miocene. In South America, the related phorusrhacids shared the dominant predatory niches with metatherian sparassodonts during most of the Cenozoic but declined and ultimately went extinct after eutherian predators arrived from North America (as part of the Great American Interchange) during the Pliocene. In contrast, large herbivorous flightless ratites have survived to the present.[30]

However, none of the flightless birds of the Cenozoic, including the predatory Brontornis, possibly omnivorous Dromornis stirtoni[30] or herbivorous Aepyornis, ever grew to masses much above 500 kilograms (1,100 lb); thus, they never attained the size of the largest mammalian carnivores, let alone that of the largest mammalian herbivores. It has been suggested that the increasing thickness of avian eggshells in proportion to egg mass with increasing egg size places an upper limit on the size of birds.[31][note 1] The largest species of Dromornis, D. stirtoni, may have gone extinct after it attained the maximum avian body mass and was then outcompeted by marsupial diprotodonts that evolved to sizes several times larger.[34]

In giant turtles

Giant tortoises were important components of late Cenozoic megafaunas, being present in every nonpolar continent until the arrival of homininans.[35][36] The largest known terrestrial tortoise was Megalochelys atlas, an animal that probably weighed about 1,000 kg (2,200 lb).[37]

Some earlier aquatic Testudines, e.g. the marine Archelon of the Cretaceous[38] and freshwater Stupendemys of the Miocene, were considerably larger, weighing more than 2,000 kg (4,400 lb).[39]

Megafaunal mass extinctions

Timing and possible causes

Correlations between times of first appearance of humans and unique megafaunal extinction pulses on different land masses
Cyclical pattern of global climate change over the last 450,000 years (based on Antarctic temperatures and global ice volume), showing that there were no unique climatic events that would account for any of the megafaunal extinction pulses

Numerous extinctions occurred during the latter half of the Last Glacial Period when most large mammals went extinct in the Americas, Australia-New Guinea, and Eurasia, including over 80% of all terrestrial animals with a body mass greater than 1,000 kilograms (2,200 lb). Small animals and other organisms like plants were generally unaffected by the extinctions, which is unprecented in previous extinctions during the last 30 million years.[40]

Various theories have attributed the wave of extinctions to human hunting, climate change, disease, extraterrestrial impact, competition from other animals or other causes. However, this extinction near the end of the Pleistocene was just one of a series of megafaunal extinction pulses that have occurred during the last 50,000 years over much of the Earth's surface, with Africa and Asia (where the local megafauna had a chance to evolve alongside modern humans) being comparatively less affected. The latter areas did suffer gradual attrition of megafauna, particularly of the slower-moving species (a class of vulnerable megafauna epitomized by giant tortoises), over the last several million years.[41][42]

Outside the mainland of Afro-Eurasia, these megafaunal extinctions followed a highly distinctive landmass-by-landmass pattern that closely parallels the spread of humans into previously uninhabited regions of the world, and which shows no overall correlation with climatic history (which can be visualized with plots over recent geological time periods of climate markers such as marine oxygen isotopes or atmospheric carbon dioxide levels).[43][44]) were struck first around 46,000 years ago, followed by Tasmania about 41,000 years ago (after formation of a land bridge to Australia about 43,000 years ago).[45][46] The role of humans in the extinction of Australia and New Guinea's megafauna has been disputed, with multiple studies showing a decline in the number of species prior to the arrival of humans on the continent and the absence of any evidence of human predation;[47][48][49][50] the impact of climate change has instead been cited for their decline.[51][47] Similarly, Japan lost most of its megafauna apparently about 30,000 years ago,[52] Cyprus 10,000 years ago,[53][54] the Antilles 6,000 years ago,[55][56] New Caledonia[57] and nearby islands[58] 3,000 years ago, Madagascar 2,000 years ago,[59] New Zealand 700 years ago,[60] the Mascarenes 400 years ago,[61] and the Commander Islands 250 years ago.[62] Nearly all of the world's isolated islands could furnish similar examples of extinctions occurring shortly after the arrival of humans, though most of these islands, such as the Hawaiian Islands, never had terrestrial megafauna, so their extinct fauna were smaller, but still displayed island gigantism.[43][44]

An analysis of the timing of Holarctic megafaunal extinctions and extirpations over the last 56,000 years has revealed a tendency for such events to cluster within interstadials, periods of abrupt warming, but only when humans were also present. Humans may have impeded processes of migration and recolonization that would otherwise have allowed the megafaunal species to adapt to the climate shift.[63] In at least some areas, interstadials were periods of expanding human populations.[64]

An analysis of Sporormiella fungal spores (which derive mainly from the dung of megaherbivores) in swamp sediment cores spanning the last 130,000 years from Lynch's Crater in Queensland, Australia, showed that the megafauna of that region virtually disappeared about 41,000 years ago, at a time when climate changes were minimal; the change was accompanied by an increase in charcoal, and was followed by a transition from rainforest to fire-tolerant sclerophyll vegetation. The high-resolution chronology of the changes supports the hypothesis that human hunting alone eliminated the megafauna, and that the subsequent change in flora was most likely a consequence of the elimination of browsers and an increase in fire.[65][66]Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag[67]

A number of other mass extinctions occurred earlier in Earth's geologic history, in which some or all of the megafauna of the time also died out. Famously, in the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, the non-avian dinosaurs and most other giant reptiles were eliminated. However, the earlier mass extinctions were more global and not so selective for megafauna; i.e., many species of other types, including plants, marine invertebrates[68] and plankton, went extinct as well. Thus, the earlier events must have been caused by more generalized types of disturbances to the biosphere.[69]

Consequences of depletion of megafauna

Depletion of herbivorous megafauna results in increased growth of woody vegetation,[70] and a consequent increase in wildfire frequency.[71] Megafauna may help to suppress the growth of invasive plants.[72] Large herbivores and carnivores can suppress the abundance of smaller animals, resulting in their population increase when megafauna are removed.[70]

Effect on nutrient transport

Megafauna play a significant role in the lateral transport of mineral nutrients in an ecosystem, tending to translocate them from areas of high to those of lower abundance. They do so by their movement between the time they consume the nutrient and the time they release it through elimination (or, to a much lesser extent, through decomposition after death).[73] In South America's Amazon Basin, it is estimated that such lateral diffusion was reduced over 98% following the megafaunal extinctions that occurred roughly 12,500 years ago.[74][75] Given that phosphorus availability is thought to limit productivity in much of the region, the decrease in its transport from the western part of the basin and from floodplains (both of which derive their supply from the uplift of the Andes) to other areas is thought to have significantly impacted the region's ecology, and the effects may not yet have reached their limits.[75] In the sea, cetaceans and pinnipeds that feed at depth are thought to translocate nitrogen from deep to shallow water, enhancing ocean productivity, and counteracting the activity of zooplankton, which tend to do the opposite.[76]

Effect on methane emissions

Large populations of megaherbivores have the potential to contribute greatly to the atmospheric concentration of methane, which is an important greenhouse gas. Modern ruminant herbivores produce methane as a byproduct of foregut fermentation in digestion and release it through belching or flatulence. Today, around 20% of annual methane emissions come from livestock methane release. In the Mesozoic, it has been estimated that sauropods could have emitted 520 million tons of methane to the atmosphere annually,[77] contributing to the warmer climate of the time (up to 10 °C (18 °F) warmer than at present).[77][78] This large emission follows from the enormous estimated biomass of sauropods, and because methane production of individual herbivores is believed to be almost proportional to their mass.[77]

Recent studies have indicated that the extinction of megafaunal herbivores may have caused a reduction in atmospheric methane. This hypothesis is relatively new.[79] One study examined the methane emissions from the bison that occupied the Great Plains of North America before contact with European settlers. The study estimated that the removal of the bison caused a decrease of as much as 2.2 million tons per year.[80] Another study examined the change in the methane concentration in the atmosphere at the end of the Pleistocene epoch after the extinction of megafauna in the Americas. After early humans migrated to the Americas about 13,000 BP, their hunting and other associated ecological impacts led to the extinction of many megafaunal species there. Calculations suggest that this extinction decreased methane production by about 9.6 million tons per year. This suggests that the absence of megafaunal methane emissions may have contributed to the abrupt climatic cooling at the onset of the Younger Dryas.[79] The decrease in atmospheric methane that occurred at that time, as recorded in ice cores, was 2 to 4 times more rapid than any other decrease in the last half million years, suggesting that an unusual mechanism was at work.[79]

Current studies

Current studies being completed on megafauna species are reflective, and do not tend to offer a set definition of the subject; additionally, some consider there to be a significant lack in cross-disciplinary studies.[1] Many consider megafauna to be increasingly important in the topic of conservation and climate change.[11] Research set on specifically megafauna would increase the understanding of global environments and habitat system interactions.

Enquist's paper on megabiota found that climate change has caused a fast-spreading decrease of large animals. This finding implicates that many of the world's ecosystems are currently experiencing many shifts in their dynamics, losing out on vital activity within their systems.[11] Some scholars have done considerable research into how to restore populations of megafauna in order to reinstate the stability once had in that ecosystem, such as in the case of Madagascar and giant tortoises. In this study, it was found that replacing one extinct megafauna with another that had a similar niche could prevent further extinctions among the islands species.[81] Megaflora also contribute a huge amount to their ecosystems, offering shelter for many species and food for even more, including many megafauna.[82]

Pleistocene extinct megafauna

Other extinct Cenozoic megafauna

Extant

See also

Notes

  1. Nonavian dinosaur size was not similarly constrained because they had a different relationship between body mass and egg size than birds. The 400 kilograms (880 lb) Aepyornis had larger eggs than nearly all dinosaurs.[32][33]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Moleón, Marcos; Sánchez-Zapata, José A.; Donázar, José A.; Revilla, Eloy; Martín-López, Berta; Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Cayetano; Getz, Wayne M.; Morales-Reyes, Zebensui et al. (March 11, 2020). "Rethinking megafauna". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287 (1922). doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2643. ISSN 0962-8452. PMID 32126954. Bibcode2020PBioS.28792643M. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Moleón, Marcos; Sánchez-Zapata, José A.; Donázar, José A.; Revilla, Eloy; Martín-López, Berta; Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Cayetano; Getz, Wayne M.; Morales-Reyes, Zebensui et al. (2020-03-11). "Rethinking megafauna" (in en). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287 (1922). doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2643. ISSN 0962-8452. PMID 32126954. Bibcode2020PBioS.28792643M. 
  3. Malhi, Yadvinder; Doughty, Christopher E.; Galetti, Mauro; Smith, Felisa A.; Svenning, Jens-Christian; Terborgh, John W. (2016-01-26). "Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (4): 838–846. doi:10.1073/pnas.1502540113. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 26811442. Bibcode2016PNAS..113..838M. 
  4. McClenachan, Loren; Cooper, Andrew B.; Dulvy, Nicholas K. (2016-06-20). "Rethinking Trade-Driven Extinction Risk in Marine and Terrestrial Megafauna". Current Biology 26 (12): 1640–1646. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.026. ISSN 1879-0445. PMID 27291051. Bibcode2016CBio...26.1640M. 
  5. Paine, Robert T. (1969). "The Pisaster-Tegula Interaction: Prey Patches, Predator Food Preference, and Intertidal Community Structure". Ecology 50 (6): 950–961. doi:10.2307/1936888. ISSN 0012-9658. Bibcode1969Ecol...50..950P. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1936888. 
  6. McGill, Brian J.; Enquist, Brian J.; Weiher, Evan; Westoby, Mark (2006-04-01). "Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits". Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21 (4): 178–185. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002. ISSN 0169-5347. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534706000334. 
  7. Ordiz, Andrés; Aronsson, Malin; Persson, Jens; Støen, Ole-Gunnar; Swenson, Jon E.; Kindberg, Jonas (2021-02-09). "Effects of Human Disturbance on Terrestrial Apex Predators" (in en). Diversity 13 (2): 68. doi:10.3390/d13020068. ISSN 1424-2818. Bibcode2021Diver..13...68O. 
  8. Johnson, C. N. (2002-11-07). "Determinants of loss of mammal species during the Late Quaternary 'megafauna' extinctions: life history and ecology, but not body size" (in en). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269 (1506): 2221–2227. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2130. ISSN 0962-8452. PMID 12427315. 
  9. Barnosky, A. D. (2004-10-01). "Assessing the Causes of Late Pleistocene Extinctions on the Continents". Science 306 (5693): 70–75. doi:10.1126/science.1101476. PMID 15459379. Bibcode2004Sci...306...70B. 
  10. Brook, B. W.; Johnson, C. N. (2006). "Selective hunting of juveniles as a cause of the imperceptible overkill of the Australian Pleistocene megafauna". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology 30 (sup1): 39–48. doi:10.1080/03115510609506854. Bibcode2006Alch...30S..39B. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Enquist, Brian J.; Abraham, Andrew J.; Harfoot, Michael B. J.; Malhi, Yadvinder; Doughty, Christopher E. (2020-02-04). "The megabiota are disproportionately important for biosphere functioning" (in en). Nature Communications 11 (1): 699. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14369-y. ISSN 2041-1723. PMID 32019918. Bibcode2020NatCo..11..699E. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 Evans, A. R.; Jones, D.; Boyer, A. G.; Brown, J. H.; Costa, D. P.; Ernest, S. K. M.; Fitzgerald, E. M. G.; Fortelius, M. et al. (2012-01-30). "The maximum rate of mammal evolution". PNAS 109 (11): 4187–4190. doi:10.1073/pnas.1120774109. PMID 22308461. Bibcode2012PNAS..109.4187E. 
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 Smith, F. A.; Boyer, A. G.; Brown, J. H.; Costa, D. P.; Dayan, T.; Ernest, S. K. M.; Evans, A. R.; Fortelius, M. et al. (2010-11-26). "The Evolution of Maximum Body Size of Terrestrial Mammals". Science 330 (6008): 1216–1219. doi:10.1126/science.1194830. PMID 21109666. Bibcode2010Sci...330.1216S. 
  14. Clauss, M.; Frey, R.; Kiefer, B.; Lechner-Doll, M.; Loehlein, W.; Polster, C.; Roessner, G. E.; Streich, W. J. (2003-04-24). "The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters". Oecologia 136 (1): 14–27. doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1254-z. PMID 12712314. Bibcode2003Oecol.136...14C. http://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/2393/2/Oecologia_body_size_2003V.pdf. Retrieved 2019-07-13. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 Sorkin, B. (2008-04-10). "A biomechanical constraint on body mass in terrestrial mammalian predators". Lethaia 41 (4): 333–347. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2007.00091.x. Bibcode2008Letha..41..333S. 
  16. Carbone, C.; Teacher, A; Rowcliffe, J. M. (2007-01-16). "The Costs of Carnivory". PLOS Biology 5 (2, e22): 363–368. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050022. PMID 17227145. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 Ashton, K. G.; Tracy, M. C.; de Queiroz, A. (October 2000). "Is Bergmann's Rule Valid for Mammals?". The American Naturalist 156 (4): 390–415. doi:10.1086/303400. PMID 29592141. Bibcode2000ANat..156..390A. 
  18. Webb, J. (2015-02-19). "Evolution 'favours bigger sea creatures'". BBC News (BBC). https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-31533744. 
  19. Heim, N. A.; Knope, M. L.; Schaal, E. K.; Wang, S. C.; Payne, J. L. (2015-02-20). "Cope's rule in the evolution of marine animals". Science 347 (6224): 867–870. doi:10.1126/science.1260065. PMID 25700517. Bibcode2015Sci...347..867H. http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/swang1/Publications/. Retrieved 2019-07-13. 
  20. Thewissen, J. G. M.; Bajpai, S. (1 January 2001). "Whale Origins as a Poster Child for Macroevolution". BioScience 51 (12): 1037–1049. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[1037:WOAAPC2.0.CO;2]. ISSN 0006-3568. 
  21. 21.0 21.1 Goldbogen, J. A.; Cade, D. E.; Wisniewska, D. M.; Potvin, J.; Segre, P. S.; Savoca, M. S.; Hazen, E. L.; Czapanskiy, M. F. et al. (2019). "Why whales are big but not bigger: Physiological drivers and ecological limits in the age of ocean giants". Science 366 (6471): 1367–1372. doi:10.1126/science.aax9044. PMID 31831666. Bibcode2019Sci...366.1367G. 
  22. Baker, Joanna; Meade, Andrew; Pagel, Mark; Venditti, Chris (2015-04-21). "Adaptive evolution toward larger size in mammals" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (16): 5093–5098. doi:10.1073/pnas.1419823112. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 25848031. Bibcode2015PNAS..112.5093B. 
  23. Churchill, Morgan; Clementz, Mark T.; Kohno, Naoki (2014-12-19). "Cope's rule and the evolution of body size in Pinnipedimorpha (Mammalia: Carnivora)". Evolution 69 (1): 201–215. doi:10.1111/evo.12560. ISSN 0014-3820. PMID 25355195. 
  24. Haley, Michael P.; Deutsch, Charles J.; Boeuf, Burney J. Le (April 1991). "A method for estimating mass of large pinnipeds" (in en). Marine Mammal Science 7 (2): 157–164. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1991.tb00562.x. ISSN 0824-0469. Bibcode1991MMamS...7..157H. 
  25. Goldbogen, J. A. (2018-04-17). "Physiological constraints on marine mammal body size" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (16): 3995–3997. doi:10.1073/pnas.1804077115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 29618615. Bibcode2018PNAS..115.3995G. 
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 Mitchell, K. J.; Llamas, B.; Soubrier, J.; Rawlence, N. J.; Worthy, T. H.; Wood, J.; Lee, M. S. Y.; Cooper, A. (2014-05-23). "Ancient DNA reveals elephant birds and kiwi are sister taxa and clarifies ratite bird evolution". Science 344 (6186): 898–900. doi:10.1126/science.1251981. PMID 24855267. Bibcode2014Sci...344..898M. https://dspace.flinders.edu.au/xmlui/bitstream/2328/35953/1/Mitchell_AncientDNA_AM2014.pdf. Retrieved 2019-09-24. 
  27. Buffetaut, E.; Angst, D. (November 2014). "Stratigraphic distribution of large flightless birds in the Palaeogene of Europe and its palaeobiological and palaeogeographical implications". Earth-Science Reviews 138: 394–408. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.07.001. Bibcode2014ESRv..138..394B. 
  28. "Tinamous and moa flock together: mitochondrial genome sequence analysis reveals independent losses of flight among ratites". Systematic Biology 59 (1): 90–107. January 2010. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp079. PMID 20525622. 
  29. Baker, A. J.; Haddrath, O.; McPherson, J. D.; Cloutier, A. (2014). "Genomic Support for a Moa-Tinamou Clade and Adaptive Morphological Convergence in Flightless Ratites". Molecular Biology and Evolution 31 (7): 1686–1696. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu153. PMID 24825849. 
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 Murray, Peter F.; Vickers-Rich, Patricia (2004). Magnificent Mihirungs: The Colossal Flightless Birds of the Australian Dreamtime. Indiana University Press. pp. 51, 314. ISBN 978-0-253-34282-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=-t6cQHdVEggC&pg=PA51. Retrieved 7 January 2012. 
  31. Ibid (2004). p. 212. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-34282-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=-t6cQHdVEggC&pg=PA212. 
  32. Kenneth Carpenter (1999). Eggs, Nests, and Baby Dinosaurs: A Look at Dinosaur Reproduction. Indiana University Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-253-33497-8. OCLC 42009424. https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780253334978. Retrieved 6 May 2013. 
  33. Jackson, F. D.; Varricchio, D. J.; Jackson, R. A.; Vila, B.; Chiappe, L. M. (2008). "Comparison of water vapor conductance in a titanosaur egg from the Upper Cretaceous of Argentina and a Megaloolithus siruguei egg from Spain". Paleobiology 34 (2): 229–246. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2008)034[0229:COWVCI2.0.CO;2]. ISSN 0094-8373. 
  34. Ibid (2004). p. 277. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-34282-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=-t6cQHdVEggC&pg=PA277. 
  35. Hansen, D. M.; Donlan, C. J.; Griffiths, C. J.; Campbell, K. J. (April 2010). "Ecological history and latent conservation potential: large and giant tortoises as a model for taxon substitutions". Ecography 33 (2): 272–284. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06305.x. Bibcode2010Ecogr..33..272H. http://www.advancedconservation.org/library/hansen_etal_2010.pdf. Retrieved 2011-02-26. 
  36. Cione, A. L.; Tonni, E. P.; Soibelzon, L. (2003). "The Broken Zig-Zag: Late Cenozoic large mammal and tortoise extinction in South America". Rev. Mus. Argentino Cienc. Nat.. Nueva Serie 5 (1): 1–19. doi:10.22179/REVMACN.5.26. ISSN 1514-5158. 
  37. Gordon, Iain J.; Prins, Herbert H. T.; Mallon, Jordan; Puk, Laura D.; Miranda, Everton B. P.; Starling-Manne, Carolina; van der Wal, René; Moore, Ben et al. (2019), Gordon, Iain J.; Prins, Herbert H. T., eds., "The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing in Other Vertebrate Taxa" (in en), The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing II (Cham: Springer International Publishing): pp. 339–404, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25865-8_15, ISBN 978-3-030-25865-8 
  38. Jaffe, Alexander L.; Slater, Graham J.; Alfaro, Michael E. (2011-08-23). "The evolution of island gigantism and body size variation in tortoises and turtles" (in en). Biology Letters 7 (4): 558–561. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.1084. ISSN 1744-9561. PMID 21270022. Bibcode2011BiLet...7..558J. 
  39. Cadena, Edwin-Alberto; Link, Andrés; Cooke, Siobhán B.; Stroik, Laura K.; Vanegas, Andrés F.; Tallman, Melissa (December 2021). "New insights on the anatomy and ontogeny of the largest extinct freshwater turtles". Heliyon 7 (12). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08591. ISSN 2405-8440. PMID 35005268. Bibcode2021Heliy...708591C. 
  40. Svenning, Jens-Christian; Lemoine, Rhys T.; Bergman, Juraj; Buitenwerf, Robert; Le Roux, Elizabeth; Lundgren, Erick; Mungi, Ninad; Pedersen, Rasmus Ø. (2024). "The late-Quaternary megafauna extinctions: Patterns, causes, ecological consequences and implications for ecosystem management in the Anthropocene" (in en). Cambridge Prisms: Extinction 2. doi:10.1017/ext.2024.4. ISSN 2755-0958. PMID 40078803. 
  41. Corlett, R. T. (2006). "Megafaunal extinctions in tropical Asia". Tropinet 17 (3): 1–3. http://www.tropicalbio.org/pastissues/tn_v17_n3_Sept_2006.pdf. Retrieved 2010-10-04. 
  42. Edmeades, Baz. "Megafauna — First Victims of the Human-Caused Extinction". (internet-published book with Foreword by Paul S. Martin). http://www.megafauna.com/. 
  43. 43.0 43.1 Martin, P. S. (2005). "Chapter 6. Deadly Syncopation". Twilight of the Mammoths: Ice Age Extinctions and the Rewilding of America. University of California Press. pp. 118–128. ISBN 978-0-520-23141-2. OCLC 58055404. https://books.google.com/books?id=gfpla1OY268C&pg=PA118. Retrieved 2014-11-11. 
  44. 44.0 44.1 Callaway, E. (2016-09-21). "Human remains found in hobbit cave". Nature 20 (7): 395–401. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20656. PMID 16701402. http://web.njit.edu/~krussell/Required.pdf. Retrieved 2014-11-11. 
  45. Nature 454 (7206): 835–836. 2008-08-13. doi:10.1038/454835a. PMID 18704074. Bibcode2008Natur.454..835D. 
  46. Roberts, R.; Jacobs, Z. (October 2008). "The Lost Giants of Tasmania". Australasian Science 29 (9): 14–17. http://www.control.com.au/bi2008/299megafauna.pdf. Retrieved 2011-08-26. 
  47. 47.0 47.1 Field, Judith; Wroe, Stephen; Trueman, Clive N.; Garvey, Jillian; Wyatt-Spratt, Simon (2013-02-08). "Looking for the archaeological signature in Australian Megafaunal extinctions" (in en). Quaternary International. Peopling the last new worlds: the first colonisation of Sahul and the Americas 285: 76–88. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2011.04.013. ISSN 1040-6182. Bibcode2013QuInt.285...76F. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618211002266. 
  48. Dodson, John; Field, Judith H. (2018). "What does the occurrence of Sporormiella (Preussia) spores mean in Australian fossil sequences?" (in en). Journal of Quaternary Science 33 (4): 380–392. doi:10.1002/jqs.3020. ISSN 1099-1417. Bibcode2018JQS....33..380D. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jqs.3020. 
  49. Wroe, Stephen; Field, Judith H.; Archer, Michael; Grayson, Donald K.; Price, Gilbert J.; Louys, Julien; Faith, J. Tyler; Webb, Gregory E. et al. (2013-09-03). "Reply to Brook et al: No empirical evidence for human overkill of megafauna in Sahul" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (36): E3369. doi:10.1073/pnas.1310440110. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 24137797. Bibcode2013PNAS..110E3369W. 
  50. Dortch, Joe; Cupper, Matt; Grün, Rainer; Harpley, Bernice; Lee, Kerrie; Field, Judith (2016-08-01). "The timing and cause of megafauna mass deaths at Lancefield Swamp, south-eastern Australia" (in en). Quaternary Science Reviews 145: 161–182. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.05.042. ISSN 0277-3791. Bibcode2016QSRv..145..161D. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379116301949. 
  51. Wroe, Stephen; Field, Judith H.; Archer, Michael; Grayson, Donald K.; Price, Gilbert J.; Louys, Julien; Faith, J. Tyler; Webb, Gregory E. et al. (2013-05-28). "Climate change frames debate over the extinction of megafauna in Sahul (Pleistocene Australia-New Guinea)" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (22): 8777–8781. doi:10.1073/pnas.1302698110. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 23650401. Bibcode2013PNAS..110.8777W. 
  52. Fiedel, Stuart; Kondo, Y.; Ono, A.; Zhang, Y.; Diab, M. C. (2009-05-23). Sudden Deaths: The Chronology of Terminal Pleistocene Megafaunal Extinction. in Haynes, Gary. "American Megafaunal Extinctions at the End of the Pleistocene". Quaternary International. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology (Springer) 211 (1–2): 21–37. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8793-6_2. ISBN 978-1-4020-8792-9. 
  53. Simmons, A. H. (1999). Faunal extinction in an island society: pygmy hippopotamus hunters of Cyprus. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. p. 382. doi:10.1007/b109876. ISBN 978-0-306-46088-3. OCLC 41712246. https://books.google.com/books?id=hCwYwyEBXEAC. Retrieved 2016-05-07. 
  54. Simmons, A. H.; Mandel, R. D. (December 2007). "Not Such a New Light: A Response to Ammerman and Noller". World Archaeology 39 (4): 475–482. doi:10.1080/00438240701676169. 
  55. "Asynchronous extinction of late Quaternary sloths on continents and islands". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (33): 11763–11768. 2005-08-16. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502777102. PMID 16085711. Bibcode2005PNAS..10211763S. 
  56. Cooke, S. B.; Dávalos, L. M.; Mychajliw, A. M.; Turvey, S. T.; Upham, N. S. (2017). "Anthropogenic Extinction Dominates Holocene Declines of West Indian Mammals". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 48 (1): 301–327. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022754. Bibcode2017AREES..48..301C. 
  57. Anderson, A.; Sand, C.; Petchey, F.; Worthy, T. H. (2010). "Faunal extinction and human habitation in New Caledonia: Initial results and implications of new research at the Pindai Caves". Journal of Pacific Archaeology 1 (1): 89–109. doi:10.70460/jpa.v1i1.12. 
  58. White, A. W.; Worthy, T. H.; Hawkins, S.; Bedford, S.; Spriggs, M. (2010-08-16). "Megafaunal meiolaniid horned turtles survived until early human settlement in Vanuatu, Southwest Pacific". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (35): 15512–15516. doi:10.1073/pnas.1005780107. PMID 20713711. Bibcode2010PNAS..10715512W. 
  59. Burney, D. A.; Burney, L. P.; Godfrey, L. R.; Jungers, W. L.; Goodman, S. M.; Wright, H. T.; Jull. A. J. T. (July 2004). "A chronology for late prehistoric Madagascar". Journal of Human Evolution 47 (1–2): 25–63. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.05.005. PMID 15288523. Bibcode2004JHumE..47...25B. 
  60. Holdaway, R. N.; Jacomb, C. (2000-03-24). "Rapid Extinction of the Moas (Aves: Dinornithiformes): Model, Test, and Implications". Science 287 (5461): 2250–2254. doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2250. PMID 10731144. Bibcode2000Sci...287.2250H. 
  61. Janoo, A. (April 2005). "Discovery of isolated dodo bones (Raphus cucullatus (L.), Aves, Columbiformes) from Mauritius cave shelters highlights human predation, with a comment on the status of the family Raphidae Wetmore, 1930". Annales de Paléontologie 91 (2): 167–180. doi:10.1016/j.annpal.2004.12.002. Bibcode2005AnPal..91..167J. 
  62. Anderson, P. K. (July 1995). "Competition, Predation, and the Evolution and Extinction of Steller's Sea Cow, Hydrodamalis gigas". Marine Mammal Science 11 (3): 391–394. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1995.tb00294.x. Bibcode1995MMamS..11..391A. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119963340/abstract. Retrieved 2011-08-30. 
  63. Cooper, A.; Turney, C.; Hughen, K. A.; Brook, B. W.; McDonald, H. G.; Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2015-07-23). "Abrupt warming events drove Late Pleistocene Holarctic megafaunal turnover". Science 349 (6248): 602–6. doi:10.1126/science.aac4315. PMID 26250679. Bibcode2015Sci...349..602C. 
  64. Müller, U. C.; Pross, J.; Tzedakis, P. C.; Gamble, C.; Kotthoff, U.; Schmiedl, G.; Wulf, S.; Christanis, K. (February 2011). "The role of climate in the spread of modern humans into Europe". Quaternary Science Reviews 30 (3–4): 273–279. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.11.016. Bibcode2011QSRv...30..273M. 
  65. Biello, D. (2012-03-22). "Big Kill, Not Big Chill, Finished Off Giant Kangaroos". Scientific American news. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=hunters-killed-off-big-animals-australia. 
  66. McGlone, M. (2012-03-23). "The Hunters Did It". Science 335 (6075): 1452–1453. doi:10.1126/science.1220176. PMID 22442471. Bibcode2012Sci...335.1452M. 
  67. Ripple, W. J. (2019). "Are we eating the world's megafauna to extinction?". Conservation Letters 12 (3). doi:10.1111/conl.12627. Bibcode2019ConL...12E2627R. 
  68. Alroy, J. (2008-08-12). "Dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil record". PNAS 105 Suppl 1 (Supplement_1): 11536–11542. doi:10.1073/pnas.0802597105. PMID 18695240. Bibcode2008PNAS..10511536A. 
  69. D'Hondt, Steven (2005-12-01). "Consequences of the Cretaceous/Paleogene Mass Extinction for Marine Ecosystems" (in en). Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36 (1): 295–317. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105715. ISSN 1543-592X. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105715. 
  70. 70.0 70.1 Malhi, Yadvinder; Doughty, Christopher E.; Galetti, Mauro; Smith, Felisa A.; Svenning, Jens-Christian; Terborgh, John W. (2016-01-26). "Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (4): 838–846. doi:10.1073/pnas.1502540113. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 26811442. Bibcode2016PNAS..113..838M. 
  71. Johnson, C.N. (2009-07-22). "Ecological consequences of Late Quaternary extinctions of megafauna" (in en). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276 (1667): 2509–2519. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1921. ISSN 0962-8452. PMID 19324773. 
  72. Mungi, Ninad Avinash; Jhala, Yadvendradev V.; Qureshi, Qamar; le Roux, Elizabeth; Svenning, Jens-Christian (October 2023). "Megaherbivores provide biotic resistance against alien plant dominance" (in en). Nature Ecology & Evolution 7 (10): 1645–1653. doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02181-y. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 37652995. Bibcode2023NatEE...7.1645M. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02181-y. 
  73. Wolf, A.; Doughty, C. E.; Malhi, Y. (2013). "Lateral Diffusion of Nutrients by Mammalian Herbivores in Terrestrial Ecosystems". PLoS ONE 8 (8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071352. PMID 23951141. Bibcode2013PLoSO...871352W. 
  74. Marshall, M. (2013-08-11). "Ecosystems still feel the pain of ancient extinctions". New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24026-ecosystems-still-feel-the-pain-of-ancient-extinctions.html. Retrieved 2013-08-12. 
  75. 75.0 75.1 Doughty, C. E.; Wolf, A.; Malhi, Y. (2013-08-11). "The legacy of the Pleistocene megafauna extinctions on nutrient availability in Amazonia". Nature Geoscience 6 (9): 761–764. doi:10.1038/ngeo1895. Bibcode2013NatGe...6..761D. 
  76. Roman, J.; McCarthy, J.J. (2010). "The Whale Pump: Marine Mammals Enhance Primary Productivity in a Coastal Basin". PLOS ONE 5 (10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013255. PMID 20949007. Bibcode2010PLoSO...513255R. 
  77. 77.0 77.1 77.2 Wilkinson, D. M.; Nisbet, E. G.; Ruxton, G. D. (2012-05-08). "Could methane produced by sauropod dinosaurs have helped drive Mesozoic climate warmth?". Current Biology 22 (9): R292–R293. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.042. PMID 22575462. Bibcode2012CBio...22.R292W. 
  78. "Dinosaur gases 'warmed the Earth'". BBC Nature News. 2012-05-07. http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/17953792. 
  79. 79.0 79.1 79.2 Smith, F. A.; Elliot, S. M.; Lyons, S. K. (2010-05-23). "Methane emissions from extinct megafauna". Nature Geoscience 3 (6): 374–375. doi:10.1038/ngeo877. Bibcode2010NatGe...3..374S. 
  80. Kelliher, F. M.; Clark, H. (2010-03-15). "Methane emissions from bison—An historic herd estimate for the North American Great Plains". Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 150 (3): 473–577. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.019. Bibcode2010AgFM..150..473K. 
  81. Pedrono, Miguel; Griffiths, Owen L.; Clausen, Alison; Smith, Lora L.; Griffiths, Christine J.; Wilmé, Lucienne; Burney, David A. (2013-03-01). "Using a surviving lineage of Madagascar's vanished megafauna for ecological restoration". Biological Conservation 159: 501–506. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.11.027. ISSN 0006-3207. Bibcode2013BCons.159..501P. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320712004958. 
  82. Hall, C. Michael; James, Michael; Baird, Tim (2011-11-01). "Forests and trees as charismatic mega-flora: implications for heritage tourism and conservation". Journal of Heritage Tourism 6 (4): 309–323. doi:10.1080/1743873X.2011.620116. ISSN 1743-873X. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2011.620116. 
  83. Tsubamoto, T. (2012). "Estimating body mass from the astragalus in mammals". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica: 259–265. doi:10.4202/app.2011.0067.