Biology:Poliovirus

From HandWiki
Short description: Enterovirus


Poliovirus
TEM micrograph of poliovirus virions. Scale bar, 50 nm.
TEM micrograph of poliovirus virions. Scale bar (white): 50 nm
A type 3 poliovirus capsid coloured by chains
A type 3 poliovirus capsid, protein side chains coloured
Virus classification e
(unranked): Virus
Realm: Riboviria
Kingdom: Orthornavirae
Phylum: Pisuviricota
Class: Pisoniviricetes
Order: Picornavirales
Family: Picornaviridae
Genus: Enterovirus
Species:
Virus:
Poliovirus
Serotypes
  • PV-1 (Poliovirus-1)
  • PV-2 (Poliovirus-2)
  • PV-3 (Poliovirus-3)

Poliovirus, the causative agent of polio (also known as poliomyelitis), is a serotype of the species Enterovirus C, in the family of Picornaviridae.[1] There are three poliovirus serotypes: types 1, 2, and 3.

Poliovirus is composed of an RNA genome and a protein capsid. The genome is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA (+ssRNA) genome that is about 7500 nucleotides long.[2] The viral particle is about 30 nm in diameter with icosahedral symmetry. Because of its short genome and its simple composition—only RNA and a nonenveloped icosahedral protein coat that encapsulates it—poliovirus is widely regarded as the simplest significant virus.[3]

Poliovirus was first isolated in 1909 by Karl Landsteiner and Erwin Popper.[4] The structure of the virus was first elucidated in 1958 using X-ray diffraction by a team at Birkbeck College led by Rosalind Franklin,[5][6] showing the polio virus to have icosahedral symmetry.[7]

In 1981, the poliovirus genome was published by two different teams of researchers: by Vincent Racaniello and David Baltimore at MIT[8] and by Naomi Kitamura and Eckard Wimmer at Stony Brook University.[9]

The three-dimensional structure of poliovirus was determined in 1985 by James Hogle at Scripps Research Institute using X-ray crystallography.[10]

Poliovirus is one of the most well-characterized viruses, and has become a useful model system for understanding the biology of RNA viruses.

Replication cycle

The replication cycle of poliovirus is initiated by binding to the cell surface receptor CD155 (1). The virion forms a pore in the cell membrane through which viral RNA is released into the cytoplasm (2). Translation of the viral RNA occurs by an IRES-mediated mechanism (3). The polyprotein is cleaved, yielding mature viral proteins (4). The positive-sense RNA serves as template for complementary negative-strand synthesis, producing double-stranded replicative form (RF) RNA (5). Many positive strand RNA copies are produced from the single negative strand (6). The newly synthesized positive-sense RNA molecules can serve as templates for translation of more viral proteins (7) or can be enclosed in a capsid (8), which ultimately generates progeny virions. Lysis of the infected cell results in release of infectious progeny virions (9).[11]

Poliovirus infects human cells by binding to an immunoglobulin-like receptor, CD155 (also known as the poliovirus receptor or PVR)[12][13] on the cell surface.[14] Interaction of poliovirus and CD155 facilitates an irreversible conformational change of the viral particle necessary for viral entry.[15][16] Following attachment to the host cell membrane, entry of the viral nucleic acid was thought to occur one of two ways: via the formation of a pore in the plasma membrane through which the RNA is then "injected" into the host cell cytoplasm, or via virus uptake by receptor-mediated endocytosis.[17] Recent experimental evidence supports the latter hypothesis and suggests that poliovirus binds to CD155 and is taken up by endocytosis. Immediately after internalization of the particle, the viral RNA is released.[18]

Poliovirus is a positive-stranded RNA virus. Thus, the genome enclosed within the viral particle can be used as messenger RNA and immediately translated by the host cell. On entry, the virus hijacks the cell's translation machinery, causing inhibition of cellular protein synthesis in favor of virus-specific protein production.[19] Unlike the host cell's mRNAs, the 5' end of poliovirus RNA is extremely long—over 700 nucleotides—and highly structured. This region of the viral genome is called an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). This region consists of many secondary structures and 3 or 4 domains. Domain 3 is a self folding RNA element that contains conserved structural motifs in various stable stem loops linked by two four-way junctions. As IRES consists of many domains, these domains themselves consist of many loops that contribute to modified translation without a 5’ end cap by hijacking ribosomes. The interaction loop of domain 3 is known as GNRA tetraloop. The residues of adenosines A180 and A181 in the GUAA tetraloop form hydrogen bonds via non canonical base pairing interactions with the base pairs of the receptors C230/G242 and G231/C241, respectively.[20] Genetic mutations in this region prevent viral protein production.[21][22][23] The first IRES to be discovered was found in poliovirus RNA.[24]

Poliovirus mRNA is translated as one long polypeptide. This polypeptide is then autocleaved by internal proteases into about 10 individual viral proteins. Not all cleavages occur with the same efficiency. Therefore, the amounts of proteins produced by the polypeptide cleavage vary: for example, smaller amounts of 3Dpol are produced than those of capsid proteins, VP1–4.[25][26] These individual viral proteins are:[3][27]

The genomic structure of poliovirus type 1[11]
  • 3Dpol, an RNA dependent RNA polymerase whose function is to make multiple copies of the viral RNA genome
  • 2Apro and 3Cpro/3CDpro, proteases which cleave the viral polypeptide
  • VPg (3B), a small protein that binds viral RNA and is necessary for synthesis of viral positive and negative strand RNA
  • 2BC, 2B, 2C (an ATPase)[28], 3AB, 3A, 3B proteins which comprise the protein complex needed for virus replication.
  • VP0, which is further cleaved into VP2 and VP4, VP1 and VP3, proteins of the viral capsid

After translation, transcription and genome replication which involve a single process, synthesis of (+) RNA) is realized. For the infecting (+)RNA to be replicated, multiple copies of (−)RNA must be transcribed and then used as templates for (+)RNA synthesis. Replicative intermediates (RIs), which are an association of RNA molecules consisting of a template RNA and several growing RNAs of varying length, are seen in both the replication complexes for (−)RNAs and (+)RNAs. For synthesis of each negative-strand and positive-strand RNAs, VPg protein in the poliovirus works as a primer. RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of the poliovirus adds two uracil nucleotides (UU) to VPg protein utilizing the poly(A) tail at the 3′-end of the +ssRNA genome as a pattern for synthesis of the negative-strand antigenomic RNA. To initiate this −ssRNA synthesis, the tyrosine hydroxyl of VPg is needed. But for the initiation of positive strand RNA synthesis, CRE-dependent VPg uridylylation is needed. Which means that VPg is once more utilized as a primer however this time it adds the two uridine triphosphates using a cis-acting replication element (CRE) as a template.[29][30]

The CRE of poliovirus is identified as an unachieved base-paired stem and a final loop consisting of 61 nt. The CRE is found in enteroviruses. It is a highly preserved secondary RNA structural element and bedded in the genome's polyprotein-coding region. The complex can be translocated to the 5' region of the genome that have no coding activity, at least 3.7-kb distant from the initial location. This process can occurs without negatively influencing activity. CRE copies do not influence replication negatively. Uridylylation process of VPg that takes place at CRE needs the presence of 3CDpro that is an RNA binding protein. It is attached to the CRE directly and specifically. Because of its presence VPg can bind the CRE properly and primary production proceeds without problems.[31]

Some of the (+) RNA molecules are used as templates for further (−) RNA synthesis, some function as mRNA, and some are destined to be the genomes of progeny virions.[25]

In the assembly of new virus particles (i.e. the packaging of progeny genome into a procapsid which can survive outside the host cell), including, respectively:[32]

  • Five copies each of VP0, VP3, and VP1 whose N termini and VP4 form interior surface of capsid, assemble into a 'pentamer' and 12 pentamers form a procapsid. (The outer surface of capsid is consisting of VP1, VP2, VP3; C termini of VP1 and VP3 form the canyons which around each of the vertices; around this time, the 60 copies of VP0 are cleaved into VP4 and VP2.)
  • Each procapsid acquires a copy of the virus genome, with VPg still attached at the 5' end.

Fully assembled poliovirus leaves the confines of its host cell by lysis[33] 4 to 6 hours following initiation of infection in cultured mammalian cells.[34] The mechanism of viral release from the cell is unclear,[2] but each dying cell can release up to 10,000 polio virions.[34]

Drake demonstrated that poliovirus is able to undergo multiplicity reactivation.[35] That is, when polioviruses were irradiated with UV light and allowed to undergo multiple infections of host cells, viable progeny could be formed even at UV doses that inactivated the virus in single infections. Poliovirus can undergo genetic recombination when at least two viral genomes are present in the same host cell. Kirkegaard and Baltimore[36] presented evidence that RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) catalyzes recombination by a copy choice mechanism in which the RdRP switches between (+)ssRNA templates during negative strand synthesis. Recombination in RNA viruses appears to be an adaptive mechanism for repairing genome damage.[37][38]

Origin and serotypes

Poliovirus is structurally similar to other human enteroviruses (coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, and rhinoviruses), which also use immunoglobulin-like molecules to recognize and enter host cells.[13] Phylogenetic analysis of the RNA and protein sequences of poliovirus suggests that it may have evolved from a C-cluster Coxsackie A virus ancestor, that arose through a mutation within the capsid.[39] The distinct speciation of poliovirus probably occurred as a result of a change in cellular receptor specificity from intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), used by C-cluster Coxsackie A viruses, to CD155; leading to a change in pathogenicity, and allowing the virus to infect nervous tissue.

The mutation rate in the virus is relatively high even for an RNA virus with a synonymous substitution rate of 1.0 x 10−2 substitutions/site/year and non synonymous substitution rate of 3.0 x 10−4 substitutions/site/year.[40] Base distribution within the genome is not random with adenosine being less common than expected at the 5' end and higher at the 3' end.[41] Codon use is not random with codons ending in adenosine being favoured and those ending in cytosine or guanine being avoided. Codon use differs between the three genotypes and appears to be driven by mutation rather than selection.[42]

The three serotypes of poliovirus, PV-1, PV-2, and PV-3, each have a slightly different capsid protein. Capsid proteins define cellular receptor specificity and virus antigenicity. PV-1 is the most common form encountered in nature, but all three forms are extremely infectious.[4] As of March 2020, wild PV-1 is highly localized to regions in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Certification of the eradication of indigenous transmission occurred in September 2015 for wild PV-2, after last being detected in 1999,[43] and in October 2019 for wild PV-3, after last being detected in 2012.[44]

Specific strains of each serotype are used to prepare vaccines against polio. Inactive polio vaccine is prepared by formalin inactivation of three wild, virulent reference strains, Mahoney or Brunenders (PV-1), MEF-1/Lansing (PV-2), and Saukett/Leon (PV-3). Oral polio vaccine contains live attenuated (weakened) strains of the three serotypes of poliovirus. Passaging the virus strains in monkey kidney epithelial cells introduces mutations in the viral IRES, and hinders (or attenuates) the ability of the virus to infect nervous tissue.[34]

Polioviruses were formerly classified as a distinct species belonging to the genus Enterovirus in the family Picornaviridae. In 2008, the Poliovirus species was eliminated and the three serotypes were assigned to the species Human enterovirus C (later renamed Enterovirus C), in the genus Enterovirus in the family Picornaviridae. The type species of the genus Enterovirus was changed from Poliovirus to (Human) Enterovirus C.[45]

Pathogenesis

Main page: Medicine:Polio
Electron micrograph of poliovirus

The primary determinant of infection for any virus is its ability to enter a cell and produce additional infectious particles. The presence of CD155 is thought to define the animals and tissues that can be infected by poliovirus. CD155 is found (outside of laboratories) only on the cells of humans, higher primates, and Old World monkeys. Poliovirus is, however, strictly a human pathogen, and does not naturally infect any other species (although chimpanzees and Old World monkeys can be experimentally infected).[46]

The CD155 gene appears to have been subject to positive selection.[47] The protein has several domains of which domain D1 contains the polio virus binding site. Within this domain, 37 amino acids are responsible for binding the virus.

Poliovirus is an enterovirus. Infection occurs via the fecal–oral route, meaning that one ingests the virus and viral replication occurs in the gastrointestinal tract.[48] Virus is shed in the feces of infected individuals. In 95% of cases only a primary, transient presence of viremia (virus in the bloodstream) occurs, and the poliovirus infection is asymptomatic. In about 5% of cases, the virus spreads and replicates in other sites such as brown fat, reticuloendothelial tissue, and muscle. The sustained viral replication causes secondary viremia and leads to the development of minor symptoms such as fever, headache, and sore throat.[49] Paralytic poliomyelitis occurs in less than 1% of poliovirus infections. Paralytic disease occurs when the virus enters the central nervous system (CNS) and replicates in motor neurons within the spinal cord, brain stem, or motor cortex, resulting in the selective destruction of motor neurons leading to temporary or permanent paralysis. This is a very rare event in babies, who still have anti-poliovirus antibodies acquired from their mothers.[50] In rare cases, paralytic poliomyelitis leads to respiratory arrest and death. In cases of paralytic disease, muscle pain and spasms are frequently observed prior to onset of weakness and paralysis. Paralysis typically persists from days to weeks prior to recovery.[51]

In many respects, the neurological phase of infection is thought to be an accidental diversion of the normal gastrointestinal infection.[17] The mechanisms by which poliovirus enters the CNS are poorly understood. Three nonmutually exclusive hypotheses have been suggested to explain its entry. All theories require primary viremia. The first hypothesis predicts that virions pass directly from the blood into the central nervous system by crossing the blood–brain barrier independent of CD155.[52] A second hypothesis suggests that the virions are transported from peripheral tissues that have been bathed in the viremic blood, for example muscle tissue, to the spinal cord through nerve pathways via retrograde axonal transport.[53][54][55] A third hypothesis is that the virus is imported into the CNS via infected monocytes or macrophages.[11]

Poliomyelitis is a disease of the central nervous system. However, CD155 is believed to be present on the surface of most or all human cells. Therefore, receptor expression does not explain why poliovirus preferentially infects certain tissues. This suggests that tissue tropism is determined after cellular infection. Recent work has suggested that the type I interferon response (specifically that of interferon alpha and beta) is an important factor that defines which types of cells support poliovirus replication.[56] In mice expressing CD155 (through genetic engineering) but lacking the type I interferon receptor, poliovirus not only replicates in an expanded repertoire of tissue types, but these mice are also able to be infected orally with the virus.[57]

Immune system avoidance

CD155 molecules complexed with a poliovirus particle. Reconstructed image from cryo-electron microscopy.

Poliovirus uses two key mechanisms to evade the immune system. First, it can survive the highly acidic conditions of the stomach, allowing the virus to infect the host and spread throughout the body via the lymphatic system.[3] Second, because it can replicate very quickly, the virus overwhelms the host organs before an immune response can be mounted.[58] If detail is given at the attachment phase; poliovirus with canyons on the virion surface have virus attachment sites located in pockets at the canyon bases. The canyons are too narrow for access by antibodies, so the virus attachment sites are protected from the host's immune surveillance, while the remainder of the virion surface can mutate to avoid the host's immune response.[59]

Individuals who are exposed to poliovirus, either through infection or by immunization with polio vaccine, develop immunity. In immune individuals, antibodies against poliovirus are present in the tonsils and gastrointestinal tract (specifically IgA antibodies) and are able to block poliovirus replication; IgG and IgM antibodies against poliovirus can prevent the spread of the virus to motor neurons of the central nervous system.[34] Infection with one serotype of poliovirus does not provide immunity against the other serotypes; however, second attacks within the same individual are extremely rare.[60]

PVR transgenic mouse

Although humans are the only known natural hosts of poliovirus, monkeys can be experimentally infected and they have long been used to study poliovirus. In 1990–91, a small animal model of poliomyelitis was developed by two laboratories. Mice were engineered to express a human receptor to poliovirus (hPVR).[61][62]

Unlike normal mice, transgenic poliovirus receptor (TgPVR) mice are susceptible to poliovirus injected intravenously or intramuscularly, and when injected directly into the spinal cord or the brain.[63] Upon infection, TgPVR mice show signs of paralysis that resemble those of poliomyelitis in humans and monkeys, and the central nervous systems of paralyzed mice are histocytochemically similar to those of humans and monkeys. This mouse model of human poliovirus infection has proven to be an invaluable tool in understanding poliovirus biology and pathogenicity.[64]

Three distinct types of TgPVR mice have been well studied:[65]

  • In TgPVR1 mice, the transgene encoding the human PVR was incorporated into mouse chromosome 4. These mice express the highest levels of the transgene and the highest sensitivity to poliovirus. TgPVR1 mice are susceptible to poliovirus through the intraspinal, intracerebral, intramuscular, and intravenous pathways, but not through the oral route.
  • TgPVR21 mice have incorporated the human PVR at chromosome 13. These mice are less susceptible to poliovirus infection through the intracerebral route, possibly because they express decreased levels of hPVR. TgPVR21 mice have been shown to be susceptible to poliovirus infection through intranasal inoculation, and may be useful as a mucosal infection model.[66]
  • In TgPVR5 mice, the human transgene is located on chromosome 12. These mice exhibit the lowest levels of hPVR expression and are the least susceptible to poliovirus infection.

Recently, a fourth TgPVR mouse model was developed. These "cPVR" mice carry hPVR cDNA, driven by a β-actin promoter, and have proven susceptible to poliovirus through intracerebral, intramuscular, and intranasal routes. In addition, these mice are capable of developing the bulbar form of polio after intranasal inoculation.[66]

The development of the TgPVR mouse has had a profound effect on oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) production. Previously, monitoring the safety of OPV had to be performed using monkeys, because only primates are susceptible to the virus. In 1999, the World Health Organization approved the use of the TgPVR mouse as an alternative method of assessing the effectiveness of the vaccine against poliovirus type-3. In 2000, the mouse model was approved for tests of vaccines against type-1 and type-2 poliovirus.[67]

Cloning and synthesis

Model of poliovirus-binding CD155 (shown in purple)

In 1981, Racaniello and Baltimore used recombinant DNA technology to generate the first infectious clone of an animal RNA virus, poliovirus. DNA encoding the RNA genome of poliovirus was introduced into cultured mammalian cells and infectious poliovirus was produced.[68] Creation of the infectious clone propelled understanding of poliovirus biology, and has become a standard technology used to study many other viruses.

In 2002, Eckard Wimmer's group at Stony Brook University succeeded in synthesizing poliovirus from its chemical code, producing the world's first synthetic virus.[69] Scientists first converted poliovirus's published RNA sequence, 7741 bases long, into a DNA sequence, as DNA was easier to synthesize. Short fragments of this DNA sequence were obtained by mail-order, and assembled. The complete viral genome was then assembled by a gene synthesis company. Nineteen markers were incorporated into the synthesized DNA, so that it could be distinguished from natural poliovirus. Enzymes were used to convert the DNA back into RNA, its natural state. Other enzymes were then used to translate the RNA into a polypeptide, producing functional viral particle. This whole painstaking process took two years. The newly minted synthetic virus was injected into PVR transgenic mice, to determine if the synthetic version was able to cause disease. The synthetic virus was able to replicate, infect, and cause paralysis or death in mice. However, the synthetic version was between 1,000 and 10,000 times weaker than the original virus, probably due to one of the added markers.[70]

Modification for therapies

A modification of the poliovirus, called PVSRIPO, was tested in early clinical trials as a possible treatment for cancer.[71][needs update]

References

  1. Sherris Medical Microbiology (4th ed.). McGraw Hill. 2004. ISBN 978-0-8385-8529-0. [page needed]
  2. 2.0 2.1 "Poliovirus cell entry: common structural themes in viral cell entry pathways". Annual Review of Microbiology 56: 677–702. 2002. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160757. PMID 12142481. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 The machinery of life. New York: Copernicus. 1998. ISBN 978-0-387-98273-1. [page needed]
  4. 4.0 4.1 A History of Poliomyelitis. (Yale studies in the history of science and medicine). New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press. 1971. ISBN 978-0-300-01324-5. [page needed]
  5. "Behind the picture: Rosalind Franklin and the polio model". Medical Research Council. 2019-03-14. http://www.insight.mrc.ac.uk/2013/07/24/behind-the-picture-rosalind-franklin-and-the-polio-model/#more-2575. 
  6. Maddox, Brenda (2003). Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA. London: Harper Collins. p. 296. ISBN 0-00-655211-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=YbTh44KfkPIC. Retrieved 2020-05-15. 
  7. Brown, Andrew (2007). J.D. Bernal: The Sage of Science. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 359–61. ISBN 978-0-19-920565-3. 
  8. "Molecular cloning of poliovirus cDNA and determination of the complete nucleotide sequence of the viral genome". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 78 (8): 4887–91. August 1981. doi:10.1073/pnas.78.8.4887. PMID 6272282. Bibcode1981PNAS...78.4887R. 
  9. "Primary structure, gene organization and polypeptide expression of poliovirus RNA". Nature 291 (5816): 547–53. June 1981. doi:10.1038/291547a0. PMID 6264310. Bibcode1981Natur.291..547K. 
  10. "Three-dimensional structure of poliovirus at 2.9 A resolution". Science 229 (4720): 1358–65. 27 Sep 1985. doi:10.1126/science.2994218. PMID 2994218. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 "Epidemics to eradication: the modern history of poliomyelitis". Virology Journal 4 (1): 70. July 2007. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-4-70. PMID 17623069. 
  12. "Cellular receptor for poliovirus: molecular cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of a new member of the immunoglobulin superfamily". Cell 56 (5): 855–65. March 1989. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90690-9. PMID 2538245. 
  13. 13.0 13.1 "Complexes of poliovirus serotypes with their common cellular receptor, CD155". Journal of Virology 77 (8): 4827–35. April 2003. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.8.4827-4835.2003. PMID 12663789. 
  14. "Entry and release of poliovirus as observed by electron microscopy of cultured cells". Journal of Virology 4 (4): 505–13. October 1969. doi:10.1128/JVI.4.4.505-513.1969. PMID 4309884. 
  15. "Neutralization of poliovirus by cell receptors expressed in insect cells". Journal of Virology 64 (10): 4697–702. October 1990. doi:10.1128/JVI.64.10.4697-4702.1990. PMID 2168959. 
  16. "Characterization of poliovirus conformational alteration mediated by soluble cell receptors". Virology 197 (1): 501–05. November 1993. doi:10.1006/viro.1993.1621. PMID 8212594. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 "Poliovirus and poliomyelitis: a tale of guts, brains, and an accidental event". Virus Research 111 (2): 175–93. August 2005. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2005.04.008. PMID 15885840. 
  18. "Imaging poliovirus entry in live cells". PLOS Biology 5 (7): e183. July 2007. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050183. PMID 17622193. 
  19. "Virus specific protein and a ribo-nucleic acid associated with ribosomes in poliovirus infected HeLa cells". Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 27: 271–92. 1962. doi:10.1101/SQB.1962.027.001.026. PMID 13965389. 
  20. "Modeling Three-Dimensional Structural Motifs of Viral IRES". Journal of Molecular Biology 428 (5 Pt A): 767–76. February 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.01.005. PMID 26778619. 
  21. "Initiation of protein synthesis by the eukaryotic translational apparatus on circular RNAs". Science 268 (5209): 415–17. April 1995. doi:10.1126/science.7536344. PMID 7536344. Bibcode1995Sci...268..415C. 
  22. "Internal initiation of translation of eukaryotic mRNA directed by a sequence derived from poliovirus RNA". Nature 334 (6180): 320–25. July 1988. doi:10.1038/334320a0. PMID 2839775. Bibcode1988Natur.334..320P. 
  23. "A segment of the 5' nontranslated region of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA directs internal entry of ribosomes during in vitro translation". Journal of Virology 62 (8): 2636–43. August 1988. doi:10.1128/JVI.62.8.2636-2643.1988. PMID 2839690. 
  24. Carter, John; Saunders, Venetia A. (2007). Virology: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-470-02386-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=EKRgZCdr-74C&pg=PA4. 
  25. 25.0 25.1 Carter, John; Saunders, Venetia A. (2007). Virology: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-470-02386-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=EKRgZCdr-74C&pg=PA165. Retrieved 2016-10-19. 
  26. Harper, David R. (2012). Viruses: Biology, Applications, and Control. The United States of America: Garland Science. ISBN 978-0-8153-4150-5. [page needed]
  27. "Poliomyelitis". Brown University. http://www.brown.edu/Courses/Bio_160/Projects2000/Polio/TableofContents.html. 
  28. Carter, John; Saunders, Venetia A. (2007). Virology: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons. p. 164. ISBN 978-0-470-02386-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=EKRgZCdr-74C&pg=PA164. 
  29. Louten, Jennifer (2016). "Poliovirus". Essential Human Virology. Elsevier. pp. 257–71. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800947-5.00014-4. ISBN 978-0-12-800947-5. 
  30. "Poliovirus CRE-dependent VPg uridylylation is required for positive-strand RNA synthesis but not for negative-strand RNA synthesis". Journal of Virology 77 (8): 4739–50. April 2003. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.8.4739-4750.2003. PMID 12663781. 
  31. "Structure and function analysis of the poliovirus cis-acting replication element (CRE)". RNA 9 (1): 124–37. January 2003. doi:10.1261/rna.2950603. PMID 12554882. 
  32. Carter, John; Saunders, Venetia A. (2007). Virology: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 161, 165. ISBN 978-0-470-02386-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=EKRgZCdr-74C&pg=PA165. Retrieved 2016-10-19. 
  33. Carter, John; Saunders, Venetia A. (2007). Virology: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-470-02386-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=EKRgZCdr-74C&pg=PA166. 
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 "Vaccine-derived polioviruses and the endgame strategy for global polio eradication". Annual Review of Microbiology 59: 587–635. 2005. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123625. PMID 16153180. https://zenodo.org/record/1235033. Retrieved 2018-10-26. 
  35. "Interference and multiplicity reactivation in polioviruses". Virology 6 (1): 244–64. August 1958. doi:10.1016/0042-6822(58)90073-4. PMID 13581529. 
  36. "The mechanism of RNA recombination in poliovirus". Cell 47 (3): 433–43. November 1986. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90600-8. PMID 3021340. 
  37. "How RNA viruses maintain their genome integrity". The Journal of General Virology 91 (Pt 6): 1373–87. June 2010. doi:10.1099/vir.0.020818-0. PMID 20335491. 
  38. "Sex in microbial pathogens". Infection, Genetics and Evolution 57: 8–25. January 2018. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2017.10.024. PMID 29111273. 
  39. "Evidence for emergence of diverse polioviruses from C-cluster coxsackie A viruses and implications for global poliovirus eradication". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (22): 9457–62. May 2007. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700451104. PMID 17517601. Bibcode2007PNAS..104.9457J. 
  40. "Calibration of multiple poliovirus molecular clocks covering an extended evolutionary range". Journal of Virology 82 (9): 4429–40. May 2008. doi:10.1128/JVI.02354-07. PMID 18287242. 
  41. "Mononucleotide and dinucleotide frequencies, and codon usage in poliovirion RNA". Nucleic Acids Research 9 (23): 6221–29. December 1981. doi:10.1093/nar/9.23.6221. PMID 6275352. 
  42. "Analysis of codon usage and nucleotide composition bias in polioviruses". Virology Journal 8: 146. March 2011. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-8-146. PMID 21450075. 
  43. "Global eradication of wild poliovirus type 2 declared". Global Polio Eradication Initiative. 2015-09-20. http://www.polioeradication.org/mediaroom/newsstories/Global-eradication-of-wild-poliovirus-type-2-declared/tabid/526/news/1289/Default.aspx. 
  44. "GPEI-Two out of three wild poliovirus strains eradicated" (in en-GB). http://polioeradication.org/news-post/two-out-of-three-wild-poliovirus-strains-eradicated/. 
  45. "Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2008)". Archives of Virology 154 (7): 1181–88. July 2009. doi:10.1007/s00705-009-0400-2. PMID 19495937. 
  46. "Recruitment of nectin-3 to cell-cell junctions through trans-heterophilic interaction with CD155, a vitronectin and poliovirus receptor that localizes to alpha(v)beta3 integrin-containing membrane microdomains". The Journal of Biological Chemistry 278 (33): 31251–60. August 2003. doi:10.1074/jbc.M304166200. PMID 12759359. 
  47. "Ancient positive selection on CD155 as a possible cause for susceptibility to poliovirus infection in simians". Gene 373: 16–22. May 2006. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2005.12.016. PMID 16500041. 
  48. Polioviruse. Philadelphia, Penn: Lippincott. 1969. pp. 430–73. 
  49. "Pathogenesis of poliomyelitis; reappraisal in the light of new data". Science 123 (3209): 1151–57. June 1956. doi:10.1126/science.123.3209.1151. PMID 13337331. Bibcode1956Sci...123.1151S. 
  50. Carter, John B.; Saunders, Venetia A. (2007). Virology: Principles and Applications (1st ed.). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-02386-0. OCLC 124160564. [page needed]
  51. Acute Poliomyelitis at eMedicine
    Pediatric Poliomyelitis at eMedicine
  52. "Efficient delivery of circulating poliovirus to the central nervous system independently of poliovirus receptor". Virology 229 (2): 421–28. March 1997. doi:10.1006/viro.1997.8450. PMID 9126254. 
  53. "Retrograde transport of intact poliovirus through the axon via the fast transport system". Virology 250 (1): 67–75. October 1998. doi:10.1006/viro.1998.9360. PMID 9770421. 
  54. "Poliovirus spreads from muscle to the central nervous system by neural pathways". The Journal of Infectious Diseases 166 (4): 747–52. October 1992. doi:10.1093/infdis/166.4.747. PMID 1326581. 
  55. "Limited trafficking of a neurotropic virus through inefficient retrograde axonal transport and the type I interferon response". PLOS Pathogens 6 (3): e1000791. March 2010. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000791. PMID 20221252. 
  56. "The alpha/beta interferon response controls tissue tropism and pathogenicity of poliovirus". Journal of Virology 79 (7): 4460–69. April 2005. doi:10.1128/JVI.79.7.4460-4469.2005. PMID 15767446. 
  57. "Establishment of a poliovirus oral infection system in human poliovirus receptor-expressing transgenic mice that are deficient in alpha/beta interferon receptor". Journal of Virology 81 (15): 7902–12. August 2007. doi:10.1128/JVI.02675-06. PMID 17507470. 
  58. "One hundred years of poliovirus pathogenesis". Virology 344 (1): 9–16. January 2006. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.015. PMID 16364730. 
  59. Carter, John B.; Saunders, Venetia A. (2007). Virology: Principles and Applications. Liverpool John Moores University, UK: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-02386-0. [page needed]
  60. "WHO | Poliomyelitis". https://www.who.int/biologicals/areas/vaccines/poliomyelitis/en/. 
  61. "Transgenic mice expressing a human poliovirus receptor: a new model for poliomyelitis". Cell 63 (2): 353–62. October 1990. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90168-E. PMID 2170026. 
  62. "Transgenic mice susceptible to poliovirus". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 88 (3): 951–55. February 1991. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.3.951. PMID 1846972. Bibcode1991PNAS...88..951K. 
  63. "Transgenic mice carrying the human poliovirus receptor: new animal models for study of poliovirus neurovirulence". Journal of Virology 68 (2): 681–88. February 1994. doi:10.1128/JVI.68.2.681-688.1994. PMID 8289371. 
  64. "Recent insights into poliovirus pathogenesis". Trends in Microbiology 9 (10): 501–06. October 2001. doi:10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02200-4. PMID 11597452. 
  65. "Characterization of three different transgenic mouse lines that carry human poliovirus receptor gene--influence of the transgene expression on pathogenesis". Archives of Virology 139 (3–4): 351–63. 1994. doi:10.1007/BF01310797. PMID 7832641. 
  66. 66.0 66.1 "A poliomyelitis model through mucosal infection in transgenic mice bearing human poliovirus receptor, TgPVR21". Virology 321 (1): 87–100. March 2004. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2003.12.008. PMID 15033568. 
  67. "Transgenic mice as an alternative to monkeys for neurovirulence testing of live oral poliovirus vaccine: validation by a WHO collaborative study". Bulletin of the World Health Organization 81 (4): 251–60. 2003. PMID 12764491. PMC 2572431. https://www.scielosp.org/article/bwho/2003.v81n4/251-260/en/. Retrieved 2022-04-01. 
  68. "Cloned poliovirus complementary DNA is infectious in mammalian cells". Science 214 (4523): 916–19. November 1981. doi:10.1126/science.6272391. PMID 6272391. Bibcode1981Sci...214..916R. 
  69. "Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural template". Science 297 (5583): 1016–18. August 2002. doi:10.1126/science.1072266. PMID 12114528. Bibcode2002Sci...297.1016C. 
  70. "Virology. Active poliovirus baked from scratch". Science 297 (5579): 174–75. July 2002. doi:10.1126/science.297.5579.174b. PMID 12114601. 
  71. "Oncolytic polio virotherapy of cancer". Cancer 120 (21): 3277–86. November 2014. doi:10.1002/cncr.28862. PMID 24939611. 

External links

Wikidata ☰ Q12438936 entry