Biology:Gracilicutes

From HandWiki
Redirect page

Gracilicutes
EscherichiaColi NIAID.jpg
Escherichia coli cells magnified 25,000 times
Scientific classification e
Domain: Bacteria
(unranked): Gracilicutes
Gibbons and Murray 1978[1]
Superphyla/Phyla

Pseudomonadota
"Planctobacteria"
"Sphingobacteria"
Spirochaetota
Acidobacteriota

Gracilicutes (Latin: gracilis, slender, and cutis, skin, referring to the cell wall) is a clade in bacterial phylogeny.[2]

Traditionally gram staining results were most commonly used as a classification tool, consequently until the advent of molecular phylogeny, the Kingdom Monera (as the domains Bacteria and Archaea were known then) was divided into four phyla,[1][3]

This classification system was abandoned in favour of the three-domain system based on molecular phylogeny started by C. Woese.[5][6]

Using hand-drawn schematics rather than standard molecular phylogenetic analysis, Gracilicutes was revived in 2006 by Cavalier-Smith as an infrakindgom containing the phyla Spirochaetota, Sphingobacteria (FCB), Planctobacteria (PVC), and Proteobacteria.[7] It is a gram-negative clade that branched off from other bacteria just before the evolutionary loss of the outer membrane or capsule, and just after the evolution of flagella.[7] Most notably, this author assumed an unconventional tree of life placing Chloroflexota near the origin of life and Archaea as a close relative of Actinomycetota. This taxon is not generally accepted and the three-domain system is followed.[8]

A taxon called Hydrobacteria was defined in 2009 from a molecular phylogenetic analysis of core genes. It is in contrast to the other major group of eubacteria called Terrabacteria.[9] Some researchers have used the name Gracilicutes in place of Hydrobacteria, but this does not agree with the original description of Gracilicutes by Gibbons and Murray, noted above, which included cyanobacteria and did not follow the three-domain system. Also as noted above, the use of Gracilicutes by Cavalier-Smith can be rejected because it was a major alteration of an earlier taxonomic name, was not based on a statistical analysis, and did not follow the three-domain system. The most recent genomic analyses have supported the division of Bacteria into two major superphyla, corresponding to Terrabacteria and Hydrobacteria.[10][11]

Relationships

The phylogenetic tree according to the phylogenetic analyzes of Battistuzzi (2009) is the following and with a molecular clock calibration.[9]

Timeline of life.png

Recent phylogenetic analyzes have found that proteobacteria are a paraphyletic phylum that could encompass several recently discovered candidate phyla and other phyla such as Acidobacteriota, Chrysiogenota, Deferribacterota, and possibly Aquificota. This suggests that Gracilicutes or Hydrobacteria as a clade may comprise several candidates more closely related to Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, PVC group, and FCB group than to bacteria from the clade Terrabacteria. Some of these phyla were classified as part of the proteobacteria. For example, Cavalier-Smith in his proposal of the 6 kingdoms included Acidobacteriota, Aquificota, Chrysiogenota, and Deferribacterota as part of the proteobacteria.[7]

Phylogenetic analyzes have found roughly the following phylogeny between the major and some more closely related phyla.[12][13][14][15]

Hydrobacteria 

Fusobacteriota (sometimes included in Terrabacteria.)

Spirochaetota

Poribacteria

FCB/"Sphingobacteria"

PVC/"Planctobacteria"

Elusimicrobiota

Aerophobetes

"Proteobacteria" sensu lato

Rokubacteria

Acidobacteriota

Aminicenantes

Dadabacteria

Thermodesulfobacteriota

Myxococcota

Modulibacteria

Tectomicrobia

Nitrospinota

Nitrospirota

Chrysiogenota

Deferribacterota

Dependentiae

Campylobacterota

Aquificota (sometimes included in Terrabacteria.)

Pseudomonadota

Alphaproteobacteria

Zetaproteobacteria

Acidithiobacillia

Betaproteobacteria

Gammaproteobacteria

According to the phylogenetic analysis of Hug (2016), the relationships could be the following.[16]

A Novel Representation Of The Tree Of Life.png

According to the phylogenetic analysis of Zhu (2019), the relationships could be the following:[15]

The following graph shows Cavalier-Smith's version of the tree of life, indicating the status of Gracilicutes. However, this tree is not supported by any molecular analysis so it should not be considered phylogenetic.


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 "Proposals concerning the higher taxa of bacteria.". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 28 (1): 1–6. January 1978. doi:10.1099/00207713-28-1-1. 
  2. "Accounting for horizontal gene transfers explains conflicting hypotheses regarding the position of aquificales in the phylogeny of Bacteria". BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 272. October 2008. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-272. PMID 18834516. "Accounting for horizontal gene transfers explains conflicting hypotheses regarding the position of Aquificales in the phylogeny of Bacteria". 
  3. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 1 (1st ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 1984. 
  4. "The higher taxa, or, a place for everything...?". Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 1 (1st ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 1984. pp. 31–34. 
  5. "Bacterial evolution". Microbiological Reviews 51 (2): 221–271. June 1987. doi:10.1128/MMBR.51.2.221-271.1987. PMID 2439888. 
  6. "Introductory Essays". Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2A (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. July 26, 2005. pp. 304. British Library no. GBA561951. ISBN 978-0-387-24143-2. https://www.springer.com/life+sciences/book/978-0-387-24143-2. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 "Rooting the tree of life by transition analyses". Biology Direct 1: 19. July 2006. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-1-19. PMID 16834776. 
  8. "The Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes, Tenericutes (Mollicutes), Acidobacteria, Fibrobacteres, Fusobacteria, Dictyoglomi, Gemmatimonadetes, Lentisphaerae, Verrucomicrobia, Chlamydiae, and Planctomycetes". Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 4 (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. November 24, 2010. p. 908. British Library no. GBA561951. ISBN 978-0-387-95042-6. https://www.springer.com/life+sciences/book/978-0-387-95042-6. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 "A major clade of prokaryotes with ancient adaptations to life on land". Molecular Biology and Evolution 26 (2): 335–343. February 2009. doi:10.1093/molbev/msn247. PMID 18988685. 
  10. "A rooted phylogeny resolves early bacterial evolution". Science 372 (6542): eabe0511. May 2021. doi:10.1126/science.abe0511. PMID 33958449. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/51e9e402-36b7-47a6-91de-32b8cf7320d2. 
  11. "Was the Last Bacterial Common Ancestor a Monoderm after All?". Genes 13 (2): 376. February 2022. doi:10.3390/genes13020376. PMID 35205421. 
  12. "Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system". Nature Communications 7: 13219. October 2016. doi:10.1038/ncomms13219. PMID 27774985. Bibcode2016NatCo...713219A. 
  13. "A rooted phylogeny resolves early bacterial evolution". Science (New York, N.Y.) 372 (6542). May 2021. doi:10.1126/science.abe0511. PMID 33958449. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/51e9e402-36b7-47a6-91de-32b8cf7320d2. 
  14. "Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter". Nature 499 (7459): 431–437. July 2013. doi:10.1038/nature12352. PMID 23851394. Bibcode2013Natur.499..431R. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 "Phylogenomics of 10,575 genomes reveals evolutionary proximity between domains Bacteria and Archaea". Nature Communications 10 (1): 5477. December 2019. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13443-4. PMID 31792218. Bibcode2019NatCo..10.5477Z. 
  16. "A new view of the tree of life". Nature Microbiology 1 (5): 16048. April 2016. doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48. PMID 27572647. 

Wikidata ☰ Q425684 entry