Astronomy:Moons of Pluto

Short description: Natural satellite orbiting Pluto
• Top: Styx (left) and Kerberos (right)
• Middle: Nix (left) and Hydra (right)
• Bottom: Pluto's largest moon, Charon, with its dark Mordor Macula

(Images not to scale)

The dwarf planet Pluto has five natural satellites.[1] In order of distance from Pluto, they are Charon, Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra.[2] Charon, the largest, is mutually tidally locked with Pluto, and is massive enough that Pluto–Charon is sometimes considered a double dwarf planet.[3]

History

The innermost and largest moon, Charon, was discovered by James Christy on 22 June 1978, nearly half a century after Pluto was discovered. This led to a substantial revision in estimates of Pluto's size, which had previously assumed that the observed mass and reflected light of the system were all attributable to Pluto alone.

Two additional moons were imaged by astronomers of the Pluto Companion Search Team preparing for the New Horizons mission and working with the Hubble Space Telescope on 15 May 2005, which received the provisional designations S/2005 P 1 and S/2005 P 2. The International Astronomical Union officially named these moons Nix (or Pluto II, the inner of the two moons, formerly P 2) and Hydra (Pluto III, the outer moon, formerly P 1), on 21 June 2006.[4] Kerberos, announced on 20 July 2011, was discovered while searching for Plutonian rings. Styx, announced on 7 July 2012, was discovered while looking for potential hazards for New Horizons.[5]

The small moons to approximate scale, compared to Charon.

Charon

Pluto and Charon, to scale. Photo taken by New Horizons on approach.
Main page: Astronomy:Charon (moon)

Charon is about half the diameter of Pluto and is massive enough (nearly one eighth of the mass of Pluto) that the system's barycenter lies between them, approximately 960 km above Pluto's surface.[6][lower-alpha 1] Charon and Pluto are also tidally locked, so that they always present the same face toward each other. The IAU General Assembly in August 2006 considered a proposal that Pluto and Charon be reclassified as a double planet, but the proposal was abandoned.[7] It is not clear if Charon is in hydrostatic equilibrium, which the definition of "dwarf planet" would require, though it is a perfect sphere to within current measurement uncertainty.[8]

Small moons

Animation of moons of Pluto around the barycenter of Pluto - Ecliptic plane
Front view
Side view
Pluto ·    Charon ·    Styx ·    Nix ·    Kerberos ·    Hydra
The Hubble discovery image of Nix and Hydra
Discovery image of Styx, overlaid with orbits of the satellite system

Pluto's four small circumbinary moons orbit Pluto at two to four times the distance of Charon, ranging from Styx at 42,700 kilometres to Hydra at 64,800 kilometres from the barycenter of the system. They have nearly circular prograde orbits in the same orbital plane as Charon.

All are much smaller than Charon. Nix and Hydra, the two larger, are roughly 42 and 55 kilometers on their longest axis respectively,[9] and Styx and Kerberos are 7 and 12 kilometers respectively.[10][11] All four are irregularly shaped.

Characteristics

The relative masses of Pluto's moons. Charon dominates the system. Nix and Hydra are barely visible and Styx and Kerberos are invisible at this scale.
An oblique schematic view of the Pluto–Charon system showing that Pluto orbits a point outside itself. Also visible is the mutual tidal locking between the two bodies.

The Pluto system is highly compact and largely empty: Prograde moons could stably orbit Pluto out to 53% of the Hill radius (the gravitational zone of Pluto's influence) of 6 million km, or out to 69% for retrograde moons.[12] However, only the inner 3% of the region where prograde orbits would be stable is occupied by satellites,[13] and the region from Styx to Hydra is packed so tightly that there is little room for further moons with stable orbits within this region.[14] An intense search conducted by New Horizons confirmed that no moons larger than 4.5 km in diameter exist out to a distances up to 180,000 km from Pluto (6% of the stable region for prograde moons), assuming Charon-like albedoes of 0.38 (for smaller distances, this threshold is still smaller).[15]

The orbits of the moons are confirmed to be circular and coplanar, with inclinations differing less than 0.4° and eccentricities less than 0.005.[16]

The discovery of Nix and Hydra suggested that Pluto could have a ring system. Small-body impacts can create debris that can form into a ring system. However, data from a deep-optical survey by the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope, by occultation studies,[17] and later by New Horizons, suggest that no ring system is present.

Resonances

Styx, Nix, and Hydra are thought to be in a 3-body orbital resonance with orbital periods in a ratio of 18:22:33; the respective ratio of orbits is 11:9:6.[18][19] The ratios should be exact when orbital precession is taken into account. Hydra and Nix are in a simple 2:3 resonance.[lower-alpha 2][18][20] Styx and Nix are in an 11:9 resonance, while the resonance between Styx and Hydra has a ratio of 11:6.[lower-alpha 3] This means that in a recurring cycle there are 11 orbits of Styx for every 9 of Nix and 6 of Hydra. The ratios of synodic periods are then such that there are 5 Styx–Hydra conjunctions and 3 Nix–Hydra conjunctions for every 2 conjunctions of Styx and Nix.[lower-alpha 4][18] If $\displaystyle{ \lambda }$ denotes the mean longitude and $\displaystyle{ \Phi }$ the libration angle, then the resonance can be formulated as $\displaystyle{ \Phi=3\lambda_{\rm Styx} - 5\lambda_{\rm Nix} + 2\lambda_{\rm Hydra}=180^\circ }$. As with the Laplace resonance of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter, triple conjunctions never occur. $\displaystyle{ \Phi }$ librates about 180° with an amplitude of at least 10°.[18]

All of the outer circumbinary moons are also close to mean motion resonance with the Charon–Pluto orbital period. Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra are in a 1:3:4:5:6 sequence of near resonances, with Styx approximately 5.4% from its resonance, Nix approximately 2.7%, Kerberos approximately 0.6%, and Hydra approximately 0.3%.[21] It may be that these orbits originated as forced resonances when Charon was tidally boosted into its current synchronous orbit, and then released from resonance as Charon's orbital eccentricity was tidally damped. The Pluto–Charon pair creates strong tidal forces, with the gravitational field at the outer moons varying by 15% peak to peak.

However, it was calculated that a resonance with Charon could boost either Nix or Hydra into its current orbit, but not both: boosting Hydra would have required a near-zero Charonian eccentricity of 0.024, whereas boosting Nix would have required a larger eccentricity of at least 0.05. This suggests that Nix and Hydra were instead captured material, formed around Pluto–Charon, and migrated inward until they were trapped in resonance with Charon.[22] The existence of Kerberos and Styx may support this idea.

Configurations of Hydra (blue), Nix (red) and Styx (black) over one quarter of the cycle of their mutual orbital resonance. Movements are counterclockwise and orbits completed are tallied at upper right of diagrams (click on image to see the complete cycle).

Rotation

File:PIA20052-SmallMoonsOfPluto-Animation-20151110.webm Prior to the New Horizons mission, Nix, Hydra, Styx, and Kerberos were predicted to rotate chaotically or tumble.[18] [23]

However, New Horizons imaging found that they had not tidally spun down to near a spin synchronous state where chaotic rotation or tumbling would be expected.[24] [25] New Horizons imaging found that all 4 moons were at high obliquity.[24] Either they were born that way, or they were tipped by a spin precession resonance. [25] Styx may be experiencing intermittent and chaotic obliquity variations.

Mark R. Showalter had speculated that, "Nix can flip its entire pole. It could actually be possible to spend a day on Nix in which the sun rises in the east and sets in the north. It is almost random-looking in the way it rotates."[26] Only one other moon, Saturn's moon Hyperion, is known to tumble,[27] though it is likely that Haumea's moons do so as well.[28]

Origin

Formation of Pluto's moons. 1: a Kuiper belt object approaches Pluto; 2: it collides with Pluto; 3: a dust ring forms around Pluto; 4: the debris aggregates to form Charon; 5: Pluto and Charon relax into spherical bodies.

It is suspected that Pluto's satellite system was created by a massive collision, similar to the "big whack" thought to have created the Moon.Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag All elements are with respect to the Pluto-Charon barycenter.[18] The mean separation distance between the centers of Pluto and Charon is 19,596 km.[29]

Name
(pronunciation)
Image Diameter
(km)
Mass (×1019 kg)[30] Semi-major
axis (km)
Orbital period
(days)
Orbital resonance
(relative to Charon)
Eccentricity Inclination (°)
(to Pluto's equator)
Visual
magnitude (mean)
Discovery
year
Pluto /ˈplt/
2,376.6±3.2 1305±7 2,035[29] 6.38723 1 : 1 0.0022[lower-alpha 5] 0.001 15.1 1930
Pluto I Charon /ˈʃærən/,[lower-alpha 6]
/ˈkɛərən/
1,212±1 158.7±1.5 17,536±3 6.38723 1 : 1 0.0022[lower-alpha 5] 0.001 16.8 1978
Pluto V Styx /ˈstɪks/ 16 × 9 × 8[31] 0.00075 42,656±78 20.16155 1 : 3.16 0.00579 0.81±0.16 27 2012
Pluto II Nix /ˈnɪks/ 49.8 × 33.2 × 31.1 [32] 0.005±0.004 48,694±3 24.85463 1 : 3.89 0.00204 0.133±0.008 23.7 2005
Pluto IV Kerberos /ˈkɜːrbərəs, -ɒs/ 19 × 10 × 9[31] 0.0016±0.0009 57,783±19 32.16756 1 : 5.04 0.00328 0.389±0.037 26 2011
Pluto III Hydra /ˈhdrə/
50.9 × 36.1 × 30.9 [32] 0.005±0.004 64,738±3 38.20177 1 : 5.98 0.00586 0.242±0.005 23.3 2005

Mutual events

Simulated view of Charon transiting Pluto on 25 February 1989.

Transits occur when one of Pluto's moons passes between Pluto and the Sun. This occurs when one of the satellites' orbital nodes (the points where their orbits cross Pluto's ecliptic) lines up with Pluto and the Sun. This can only occur at two points in Pluto's orbit; coincidentally, these points are near Pluto's perihelion and aphelion. Occultations occur when Pluto passes in front of and blocks one of Pluto's satellites.

Charon has an angular diameter of 4 degrees of arc as seen from the surface of Pluto; the Sun appears much smaller, only 39 to 65 arcseconds. Charon's proximity further ensures that a large proportion of Pluto's surface can experience an eclipse. Because Pluto always presents the same face towards Charon due to tidal locking, only the Charon-facing hemisphere experiences solar eclipses by Charon.

The smaller moons can cast shadows elsewhere. The angular diameters of the four smaller moons (as seen from Pluto) are uncertain. Nix's is 3–9 minutes of arc and Hydra's is 2–7 minutes. These are much larger than the Sun's angular diameter, so total solar eclipses are caused by these moons.

Eclipses by Styx and Kerberos are more difficult to estimate, as both moons are very irregular, with angular dimensions of 76.9 x 38.5 to 77.8 x 38.9 arcseconds for Styx, and 67.6 x 32.0 to 68.0 x 32.2 for Kerberos. As such, Styx has no annular eclipses, its widest axis being more than 10 arcseconds larger than the Sun at its largest. However, Kerberos, although slightly larger, cannot make total eclipses as its largest minor axis is a mere 32 arcseconds. Eclipses by Kerberos and Styx will entirely consist of partial and hybrid eclipses, with total eclipses being extremely rare.

The next period of mutual events due to Charon will begin in October 2103, peak in 2110, and end in January 2117. During this period, solar eclipses will occur once each Plutonian day, with a maximum duration of 90 minutes.[33][34]

Exploration

The Pluto system was visited by the New Horizons spacecraft in July 2015. Images with resolutions of up to 330 meters per pixel were returned of Nix and up to 1.1 kilometers per pixel of Hydra. Lower-resolution images were returned of Styx and Kerberos.[35]

Notes

1.   and barycenter for animations
2. The ratio of 18:22:33 in the 3-body resonance corresponds to a 2-body resonance with ratio 2:3 between Hydra and Nix.
3. The ratio of 18:22:33 in the 3-body resonance corresponds to a 2-body resonance with ratio 9:11 between Nix and Styx. In analogy, the ratio of 18:22:33 in the 3-body resonance corresponds to a 2-body resonance with ratio 6:11 between Hydra and Styx.
4. This is calculated as follows: for every $\displaystyle{ 1 }$ orbit of Hydra there are $\displaystyle{ \frac{33}{22}=\frac 32 }$ orbits of Nix and $\displaystyle{ \frac{33}{18}=\frac{11}{6} }$ orbits of Styx. The conjunctions then occur at a relative rate of $\displaystyle{ \frac{11}{6}-1=\frac{5}{6} }$ for Styx-Hydra, $\displaystyle{ \frac{3}{2}-1=\frac 12 }$ for Nix-Hydra and $\displaystyle{ \frac{11}{6}-\frac{3}{2}=\frac 13 }$ for Styx-Nix. Multiplying all three rates by $\displaystyle{ 6 }$ (to make them integers) yields that there are $\displaystyle{ 5 }$ Styx-Hydra conjunctions and $\displaystyle{ 3 }$ Nix-Hydra conjunctions for every $\displaystyle{ 2 }$ Styx-Nix conjunctions.
5. Orbital eccentricity and inclination of Pluto and Charon are equal because they refer to the same two-body problem (the gravitational influence of the smaller satellites is neglected here).
6. Many astronomers use this, Christy's pronunciation, rather than the classical /ˈkɛərɒn/, but both are considered to be acceptable.

References

1. Kenyon, Scott J.; Bromley, Benjamin C. (28 January 2019). "A Pluto-Charon Sonata: The Dynamical Architecture of the Circumbinary Satellite System". The Astrophysical Journal 157 (2): 79. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aafa72. Bibcode2019AJ....157...79K.
2. "Moons dance around Pluto" (in en). Smithsonian Institution. 9 June 2015.
3. Green, Daniel W. E. (21 June 2006). "Satellites of Pluto". IAU Circular 8723. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
4. Staff (30 January 2014). "Barycenter". Education.com.
5. "The IAU draft definition of "planet" and "plutons"". International Astronomical Union. 16 August 2006.
6. Nimmo, Francis (2017). "Mean radius and shape of Pluto and Charon from New Horizons images". Icarus 287: 12–29. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.06.027. Bibcode2017Icar..287...12N.
7. New Horizons Picks Up Styx
8. Last of Pluto's Moons – Mysterious Kerberos – Revealed by New Horizons
9. Steffl, A. J.; Mutchler, M. J.; Weaver, H. A.; Stern, S. A.; Durda, D. D.; Terrell, D.; Merline, W. J.; Young, L. A. et al. (2006). "New Constraints on Additional Satellites of the Pluto System". The Astronomical Journal 132 (2): 614–619. doi:10.1086/505424. Bibcode2006AJ....132..614S.
10. Stern, S. Alan; Weaver, Harold A. Jr.; Steffl, Andrew J.; et al. (2005). "Characteristics and Origin of the Quadruple System at Pluto". arXiv:astro-ph/0512599.
11. Kenyon, S. J. (2015-06-03). "Astronomy: Pluto leads the way in planet formation". Nature 522 (7554): 40–41. doi:10.1038/522040a. PMID 26040888. Bibcode2015Natur.522...40K.
12. Stern, S. A. et al. (2015). "The Pluto system: Initial results from its exploration by New Horizons". Science 350 (6258): aad1815. doi:10.1126/science.aad1815. PMID 26472913. Bibcode2015Sci...350.1815S.  (Supplements)
13. Pasachoff, Jay M.; Babcock, Bryce A.; Souza, Steven P. et al. (2006). "A Search for Rings, Moons, or Debris in the Pluto System during the 2006 July 12 Occultation". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 38 (3): 523. Bibcode2006DPS....38.2502P.
14. Showalter, M. R.; Hamilton, D. P. (3 June 2015). "Resonant interactions and chaotic rotation of Pluto's small moons". Nature 522 (7554): 45–49. doi:10.1038/nature14469. PMID 26040889. Bibcode2015Natur.522...45S.
15. Codex Regius (2016). Pluto & Charon. XinXii. p. 197. ISBN 9781534633520. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
16. Witze, Alexandra (2015). "Pluto's moons move in synchrony". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17681.
17. Matson, J. (11 July 2012). "New Moon for Pluto: Hubble Telescope Spots a 5th Plutonian Satellite". Scientific American web site.
18. Lithwick, Y.; Y. Wu (2008). "On the Origin of Pluto's Minor Moons, Nix and Hydra". arXiv:0802.2951 [astro-ph].
19. Correia, A. C. M.; Leleu, A.; Rambaux, N.; Robutel, P. (2015). "Spin-orbit coupling and chaotic rotation for circumbinary bodies. Application to the small satellites of the Pluto-Charon system". Astronomy and Astrophysics 580: L7. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526800. Bibcode2015A&A...580L..14C.
20. Weaver, H. A. (2016). "The Small Satellites of Pluto as Observed by New Horizons". Science 351 (6279): 1281. doi:10.1126/science.aae0030. PMID 26989256. Bibcode2016Sci...351.0030W.
21. Quillen, A. C.; Nichols-Fleming, F.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Noyelles, B. (2017). "Obliquity evolution of the minor satellites of Pluto and Charon". Icarus 293: 94–113. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.04.012. Bibcode2017Icar..293...94Q.
22. Wisdom, J.; Peale, S. J.; Mignard, F. (1984). "The chaotic rotation of Hyperion". Icarus 58 (2): 137–152. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90032-0. Bibcode1984Icar...58..137W.
23. Ragozzine, Darin (17 October 2016). "Rapidly Rotating Regular Satellites and Tides".
24. Pluto data from D. R. Williams (7 September 2006). "Pluto Fact Sheet". NASA. .
25. "Special Session: Planet 9 from Outer Space - Pluto Geology and Geochemistry". Lunar and Planetary Institute. 25 March 2016.
26. Verbiscer, A. J.; Porter, S. B.; Buratti, B. J.; Weaver, H. A.; Spencer, J. R.; Showalter, M. R.; Buie, M. W.; Hofgartner, J. D. et al. (2018). "Phase Curves of Nix and Hydra from the New Horizons Imaging Cameras". The Astrophysical Journal 852 (2): L35. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaa486. Bibcode2018ApJ...852L..35V.
27. "End of Eclipse". JPL Solar System Simulator. 12 December 1987.