Physics:W and Z bosons

From HandWiki
Short description: Elementary particles; gauge bosons that mediate the weak interaction
W± and Z0 Bosons
CompositionElementary particle
InteractionsWeak interaction
TheorizedGlashow, Weinberg, Salam (1968)
DiscoveredUA1 and UA2 collaborations, CERN, 1983
MassW: 80.377±0.012 GeV/c2 (2022)[1][2]
Z: 91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2[3]
decay widthW: 2.085±0.042 GeV[1]
Z: 2.4952±0.0023 GeV[3]
electric chargeW: ±1 e
Z: 0 e
Weak isospinW: ±1
Z: 0
Weak hypercharge0

In particle physics, the W and Z bosons are vector bosons that are together known as the weak bosons or more generally as the intermediate vector bosons. These elementary particles mediate the weak interaction; the respective symbols are W+, W, and Z0. The W± bosons have either a positive or negative electric charge of 1 elementary charge and are each other's antiparticles. The Z0 boson is electrically neutral and is its own antiparticle. The three particles each have a spin of 1. The W± bosons have a magnetic moment, but the Z0 has none. All three of these particles are very short-lived, with a half-life of about 3×10−25 s. Their experimental discovery was pivotal in establishing what is now called the Standard Model of particle physics.

The W bosons are named after the weak force. The physicist Steven Weinberg named the additional particle the "Z particle",[4] and later gave the explanation that it was the last additional particle needed by the model. The W bosons had already been named, and the Z bosons were named for having zero electric charge.[5]

The two W bosons are verified mediators of neutrino absorption and emission. During these processes, the W± boson charge induces electron or positron emission or absorption, thus causing nuclear transmutation.

The Z boson mediates the transfer of momentum, spin and energy when neutrinos scatter elastically from matter (a process which conserves charge). Such behavior is almost as common as inelastic neutrino interactions and may be observed in bubble chambers upon irradiation with neutrino beams. The Z boson is not involved in the absorption or emission of electrons or positrons. Whenever an electron is observed as a new free particle, suddenly moving with kinetic energy, it is inferred to be a result of a neutrino interacting with the electron (with the momentum transfer via the Z boson) since this behavior happens more often when the neutrino beam is present. In this process, the neutrino simply strikes the electron (via exchange of a boson) and then scatters away from it, transferring some of the neutrino's momentum to the electron.[lower-alpha 1]

Basic properties

These bosons are among the heavyweights of the elementary particles. With masses of 80.4 GeV/c2 and 91.2 GeV/c2, respectively, the W and Z bosons are almost 80 times as massive as the proton – heavier, even, than entire iron atoms.

Their high masses limit the range of the weak interaction. By way of contrast, the photon is the force carrier of the electromagnetic force and has zero mass, consistent with the infinite range of electromagnetism; the hypothetical graviton is also expected to have zero mass. (Although gluons are also presumed to have zero mass, the range of the color force is limited for different reasons; see Color confinement.)

All three bosons have particle spin s = 1. The emission of a W+ or W boson either lowers or raises the electric charge of the emitting particle by one unit, and also alters the spin by one unit. At the same time, the emission or absorption of a W± boson can change the type of the particle – for example changing a strange quark into an up quark. The neutral Z boson cannot change the electric charge of any particle, nor can it change any other of the so-called "charges" (such as strangeness, baryon number, charm, etc.). The emission or absorption of a Z0 boson can only change the spin, momentum, and energy of the other particle. (See also Weak neutral current.)

Relations to the weak nuclear force

The Feynman diagram for beta decay of a neutron into a proton, electron, and electron antineutrino via an intermediate W boson

The W and Z bosons are carrier particles that mediate the weak nuclear force, much as the photon is the carrier particle for the electromagnetic force.

W bosons

The W± bosons are best known for their role in nuclear decay. Consider, for example, the beta decay of cobalt-60.

6027Co6028Ni+ + e + Electron antineutrino

This reaction does not involve the whole cobalt-60 nucleus, but affects only one of its 33 neutrons. The neutron is converted into a proton while also emitting an electron (called a beta particle in this context) and an electron neutrino:

Neutron0 → Proton+ + e + Electron antineutrino

Again, the neutron is not an elementary particle but a composite of an up quark and two down quarks (udd). It is one of the down quarks that interacts in beta decay, turning into an up quark to form a proton (uud). At the most fundamental level, then, the weak force changes the flavour of a single quark:

Down quark → Up quark + W

which is immediately followed by decay of the W itself:

We + Electron antineutrino

Z bosons

The Z0 boson is its own antiparticle. Thus, all of its flavour quantum numbers and charges are zero. The exchange of a Z boson between particles, called a neutral current interaction, therefore leaves the interacting particles unaffected, except for a transfer of spin and/or momentum.[lower-alpha 2]

Z boson interactions involving neutrinos have distinct signatures: They provide the only known mechanism for elastic scattering of neutrinos in matter; neutrinos are almost as likely to scatter elastically (via Z boson exchange) as inelastically (via W boson exchange).[lower-alpha 3] Weak neutral currents via Z boson exchange were confirmed shortly thereafter (also in 1973), in a neutrino experiment in the Gargamelle bubble chamber at CERN.[8]

Predictions of the W+, W and Z0 bosons

A Feynman diagram showing the exchange of a pair of W bosons. This is one of the leading terms contributing to neutral Kaon oscillation.

Following the success of quantum electrodynamics in the 1950s, attempts were undertaken to formulate a similar theory of the weak nuclear force. This culminated around 1968 in a unified theory of electromagnetism and weak interactions by Sheldon Glashow, Steven Weinberg, and Abdus Salam, for which they shared the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics.[7][lower-alpha 3] Their electroweak theory postulated not only the W bosons necessary to explain beta decay, but also a new Z boson that had never been observed.

The fact that the W and Z bosons have mass while photons are massless was a major obstacle in developing electroweak theory. These particles are accurately described by an SU(2) gauge theory, but the bosons in a gauge theory must be massless. As a case in point, the photon is massless because electromagnetism is described by a U(1) gauge theory. Some mechanism is required to break the SU(2) symmetry, giving mass to the W and Z in the process. The Higgs mechanism, first put forward by the 1964 PRL symmetry breaking papers, fulfills this role. It requires the existence of another particle, the Higgs boson, which has since been found at the Large Hadron Collider. Of the four components of a Goldstone boson created by the Higgs field, three are absorbed by the W+, Z0, and W bosons to form their longitudinal components, and the remainder appears as the spin-0 Higgs boson.

The combination of the SU(2) gauge theory of the weak interaction, the electromagnetic interaction, and the Higgs mechanism is known as the Glashow–Weinberg–Salam model. Today it is widely accepted as one of the pillars of the Standard Model of particle physics, particularly given the 2012 discovery of the Higgs boson by the CMS and ATLAS experiments.

The model predicts that W± and Z0 bosons have the following masses:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} m_{\text{W}^\pm} &= \tfrac{1}{2}vg \\ m_{\text{Z}^0} &= \tfrac{1}{2} v\sqrt{g^2+{g'}^2} \end{align} }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ g }[/math] is the SU(2) gauge coupling, [math]\displaystyle{ g' }[/math] is the U(1) gauge coupling, and [math]\displaystyle{ v }[/math] is the Higgs vacuum expectation value.


The Gargamelle bubble chamber, now exhibited at CERN

Unlike beta decay, the observation of neutral current interactions that involve particles other than neutrinos requires huge investments in particle accelerators and particle detectors, such as are available in only a few high-energy physics laboratories in the world (and then only after 1983). This is because Z bosons behave in somewhat the same manner as photons, but do not become important until the energy of the interaction is comparable with the relatively huge mass of the Z boson.

The discovery of the W and Z bosons was considered a major success for CERN. First, in 1973, came the observation of neutral current interactions as predicted by electroweak theory. The huge Gargamelle bubble chamber photographed the tracks produced by neutrino interactions and observed events where a neutrino interacted but did not produce a corresponding lepton. This is a hallmark of a neutral current interaction and is interpreted as a neutrino exchanging an unseen Z boson with a proton or neutron in the bubble chamber. The neutrino is otherwise undetectable, so the only observable effect is the momentum imparted to the proton or neutron by the interaction.

The discovery of the W and Z bosons themselves had to wait for the construction of a particle accelerator powerful enough to produce them. The first such machine that became available was the Super Proton Synchrotron, where unambiguous signals of W bosons were seen in January 1983 during a series of experiments made possible by Carlo Rubbia and Simon van der Meer. The actual experiments were called UA1 (led by Rubbia) and UA2 (led by Pierre Darriulat),[9] and were the collaborative effort of many people. Van der Meer was the driving force on the accelerator end (stochastic cooling). UA1 and UA2 found the Z boson a few months later, in May 1983. Rubbia and van der Meer were promptly awarded the 1984 Nobel Prize in Physics, a most unusual step for the conservative Nobel Foundation. [10]

The W+, W, and Z0 bosons, together with the photon (γ), comprise the four gauge bosons of the electroweak interaction.

2022 unexpected measurement of W boson mass

Before 2022, measurements of the W boson mass appeared to be consistent with the Standard Model. For example, in 2021, experimental measurements of the W boson mass were assessed to converge around 80379±12 MeV.[11]

However, in April 2022, a new analysis of data that was obtained by the Fermilab Tevatron collider before its closure in 2011 determined the mass of the W boson to be 80433±9 MeV, which is seven standard deviations above that predicted by the Standard Model, meaning that if the model is correct[12] there should only be a one-trillionth chance that such a large mass would arise by non-systematic observational error.[13] According to Ashutosh Kotwal of Duke University and the leader of the Collider Detector at Fermilab collaboration, the lower beam luminosity used reduced the chance that events of interest would be obscured by other collisions and that the use of proton–antiproton collisions simplifies the process of quark–antiquark annihilation, which then decayed to give a lepton and a neutrino.[14] The team deliberately encrypted its data and withheld any preliminary results from themselves until the analysis was complete, to prevent "confirmation bias" bending their interpretation of the data.[15] Kotwal described it as the 'largest crack in this beautiful theory', speculating that it might be the 'first clear evidence' of other forces or particles not accounted for by the Standard Model, and which might be accounted for by theories such as supersymmetry.[13] The Nobel-winning theoretical physicist Frank Wilczek described the result as a 'monumental piece of work'.[15]

Besides being inconsistent with the Standard Model, the new measurement is also inconsistent with previous measurements such as ATLAS. This suggests that either the old or the new measurements, despite all precautions, have an unexpected systematic error, such as an undetected quirk in the equipment. Future experiments with the LHC may help determine which set of measurements, if either, are the correct ones.[15] Fermilab Deputy Director Joseph Lykken reiterated that "... the (new) measurement needs to be confirmed by another experiment before it can be interpreted fully."[16] Matthias Schott, of the University of Mainz, commented that "I do not think we have to discuss which new physics could explain the discrepancy between CDF[Collider Detector at Fermilab] and the Standard Model – we first have to understand why the CDF measurement is in strong tension with all [other measurements]".[17]

In 2023, the ATLAS experiment released an improved measurement for the mass of the W boson, 80360±16 MeV, which aligned with predictions from the Standard Model.[18][19] The combination of all measurements of the W boson mass, excluding the measurement from CDF, yields a value of (80369.2 ± 13.3) MeV/c², which deviates from the CDF measurement with a significance of 3.6σ.[20]


The W and Z bosons decay to fermion pairs but neither the W nor the Z bosons have sufficient energy to decay into the highest-mass top quark. Neglecting phase space effects and higher order corrections, simple estimates of their branching fractions can be calculated from the coupling constants.

W bosons

W bosons can decay to a lepton and antilepton (one of them charged and another neutral)[lower-alpha 4] or to a quark and antiquark of complementary types (with opposite electric charges ±+1/3 and +2/3). The decay width of the W boson to a quark–antiquark pair is proportional to the corresponding squared CKM matrix element and the number of quark colours, NC = 3 . The decay widths for the W+ boson are then proportional to:

Leptons Quarks
e+νe 1 ud 3 [math]\displaystyle{ |V_\text{ud}|^2 }[/math] us 3 [math]\displaystyle{ |V_\text{us}|^2 }[/math] ub 3 [math]\displaystyle{ |V_\text{ub}|^2 }[/math]
μ+νμ 1 cd 3 [math]\displaystyle{ |V_\text{cd}|^2 }[/math] cs 3 [math]\displaystyle{ |V_\text{cs}|^2 }[/math] cb 3 [math]\displaystyle{ |V_\text{cb}|^2 }[/math]
τ+ντ 1 Energy conservation forbids decay to t.

Here, e+, μ+, τ+ denote the three flavours of leptons (more exactly, the positive charged antileptons). νe, νμ, ντ denote the three flavours of neutrinos. The other particles, starting with u and d, all denote quarks and antiquarks (factor NC is applied). The various [math]\displaystyle{ \, V_{ij} \, }[/math] denote the corresponding CKM matrix coefficients.[lower-alpha 5]

Unitarity of the CKM matrix implies that [math]\displaystyle{ ~ |V_\text{ud}|^2 + |V_\text{us}|^2 + |V_\text{ub}|^2 ~ = }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ ~|V_\text{cd}|^2 + |V_\text{cs}|^2 + |V_\text{cb}|^2 = 1 ~, }[/math] thus each of two quark rows sums to 3. Therefore, the leptonic branching ratios of the W boson are approximately [math]\displaystyle{ \, B( \mathrm{e}^{+} \mathrm{\nu}_\mathrm{e}) = \, }[/math][math]\displaystyle{ \, B(\mathrm{\mu}^{+} \mathrm{\nu}_\mathrm{\mu}) = \, }[/math][math]\displaystyle{ \, B(\mathrm{\tau}^{+} \mathrm{\nu}_\mathrm{\tau}) = \, }[/math] 1/9 The hadronic branching ratio is dominated by the CKM-favored ud and cs final states. The sum of the hadronic branching ratios has been measured experimentally to be 67.60±0.27%, with [math]\displaystyle{ \, B( \ell^{+} \mathrm{\nu}_\ell ) = \, }[/math] 10.80±0.09%.[21]

Z0 boson

Z bosons decay into a fermion and its antiparticle. As the Z0 boson is a mixture of the pre-symmetry-breaking W0 and B0 bosons (see weak mixing angle), each vertex factor includes a factor [math]\displaystyle{ ~ T_3 - Q \sin^2 \,\theta_\mathsf{W} ~, }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ \, T_3 \, }[/math] is the third component of the weak isospin of the fermion (the "charge" for the weak force), [math]\displaystyle{ \, Q \, }[/math] is the electric charge of the fermion (in units of the elementary charge), and [math]\displaystyle{ \; \theta_\mathsf{w} \; }[/math] is the weak mixing angle. Because the weak isospin [math]\displaystyle{ (\, T_3 \,) }[/math] is different for fermions of different chirality, either left-handed or right-handed, the coupling is different as well.

The relative strengths of each coupling can be estimated by considering that the decay rates include the square of these factors, and all possible diagrams (e.g. sum over quark families, and left and right contributions). The results tabulated below are just estimates, since they only include tree-level interaction diagrams in the Fermi theory.

Particles Weak isospin [math]\displaystyle{ (\, T_3 \,) }[/math] Relative factor Branching ratio
Name Symbols LEFT RIGHT Predicted for x = 0.23 Experimental measurements[22]
Neutrinos (all) νe, νμ, ντ 1/2 [lower-alpha 6] [math]\displaystyle{ \, 3 (\tfrac{1}{2} )^2 \, }[/math] 20.5% 20.00±0.06%
Charged leptons (all) e, μ, τ [math]\displaystyle{ \, 3 (-\tfrac{1}{2} + x )^2 + 3 x^2 \, }[/math] 10.2% 10.097±0.003%
Electron e [math]\displaystyle{ \, -\tfrac{1}{2} + x \, }[/math] x [math]\displaystyle{ \,( -\tfrac{1}{2} + x )^2 + x^2 \, }[/math] 3.4% 3.363±0.004%
Muon μ 1/2 + x x (−1/2 + x)2 + x2 3.4% 3.366±0.007%
Tau τ 1/2 + x x (−1/2 + x)2 + x2 3.4% 3.367±0.008%
Hadrons 69.2% 69.91±0.06%
Down-type quarks d, s, b 1/2 + 1/3x 1/3x 3 (−1/2 + 1/3x)2 + 3 (1/3x)2 15.2% 15.6±0.4%
Up-type quarks
(* except t)
u, c 1/22/3x 2/3x 3 (1/22/3x)2 + 3 (−2/3x)2 11.8% 11.6±0.6%
To keep the notation compact, the table uses [math]\displaystyle{ ~ x = \sin^2 \,\theta_\text{W} ~. }[/math]
* The impossible decay into a top quark–antiquark pair is left out of the table.[lower-alpha 7]
Subheadings LEFT and RIGHT denote the chirality or "handedness" of the fermions.[lower-alpha 6]

In 2018, the CMS collaboration observed the first exclusive decay of the Z boson to a ψ meson and a lepton–antilepton pair.[23]

See also


  1. Because neutrinos are neither affected by the strong force nor the electromagnetic force, and because the gravitational force between subatomic particles is negligible, by deduction (technically, abduction), such an interaction can only happen via the weak force. Since such an electron is not created from a nucleon (the nucleus left behind remains the same as before) and the departing electron is unchanged, except for the impulse imparted by the neutrino, this force interaction between the neutrino and the electron must be mediated by an electromagnetically neutral, weak force boson. Thus, since no other neutrino-interacting neutral force carrier is known, the observed interaction must have occurred by exchange of a Z0 boson.
  2. However, see Flavor-changing neutral current for a conjecture that a rare Z exchange might cause flavor change.
  3. 3.0 3.1 The first prediction of Z bosons was made by Brazilian physicist José Leite Lopes in 1958,[6] by devising an equation which showed the analogy of the weak nuclear interactions with electromagnetism. Steve Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow, and Abdus Salam later used these results to develop the electroweak unification,[7] in 1973.
  4. Specifically:
    W → charged lepton + antineutrino
    W+ → charged antilepton + neutrino
  5. Every entry in the lepton column can also be written as three decays, e.g. for the first row, as e+ν1, e+ν2, e+ν3, for every neutrino mass eigenstate, with decay widths proportional to [math]\displaystyle{ \, |U_\text{e1}|^2 \, , }[/math][math]\displaystyle{ \, |U_\text{e2}|^2\, , }[/math][math]\displaystyle{ \, |U_\text{e3}|^2 \, }[/math] (PMNS matrix elements), but experiments at present that measure the decays can't discriminate between neutrino mass eigenstates: They measure total decay width of the sum of all three processes.
  6. 6.0 6.1 In the Standard Model, right-handed neutrinos (and left-handed anti-neutrinos) do not exist; however, some extensions beyond the Standard Model allow them. If they do exist, they all have isospin T3 = 0 and electric charge Q = 0, and with color charge also zero. The all-zero charges make them "sterile", i.e. unable to interact by either the weak or electric forces no strong-force interactions either.
  7. The mass of the t quark plus a t is greater than the mass of the Z boson, so it does not have sufficient energy to decay into a tt quark pair.


  1. 1.0 1.1 Tanabashi, M. (2018). "Review of Particle Physics". Physical Review D 98 (3): 030001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001. Bibcode2018PhRvD..98c0001T. 
  2. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), "Mass and Width of the W Boson", Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  3. 3.0 3.1 Tanabashi, M. (2018). "Review of Particle Physics". Physical Review D 98 (3): 030001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001. Bibcode2018PhRvD..98c0001T. 
  4. Weinberg, Steven (1967). "A Model of Leptons". Physical Review Letters 19 (21): 1264–1266. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.19.1264. Bibcode1967PhRvL..19.1264W.  — The electroweak unification paper.
  5. Weinberg, Steven (1993). Dreams of a Final Theory: The search for the fundamental laws of nature. Vintage Press. p. 94. ISBN 978-0-09-922391-7. 
  6. Lopes, J. Leite (September 1999). "Forty years of the first attempt at the electroweak unification and of the prediction of the weak neutral boson". Brazilian Journal of Physics 29 (3): 574–578. doi:10.1590/S0103-97331999000300024. ISSN 0103-9733. Bibcode1999BrJPh..29..574L. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979". Nobel Foundation. 
  8. "The discovery of the weak neutral currents". CERN Courier. 3 October 2004. 
  9. "The UA2 Collaboration collection". 
  10. "Nobel Prize in Physics 1984" (Press release). Nobel Foundation.
  11. P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2021) and 2021 update.
  12. Borenstein, Seth, Key particle weighs in a bit heavy, confounding physicists, Associated Press (AP), April 7, 2022
  13. 13.0 13.1 Weule, Genelle (8 April 2022). "Standard Model of physics challenged by most precise measurement of W boson particle yet". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 9 April 2022. 
  14. Wogan, Tim (8 April 2022). "W boson mass measurement surprises physicists". Physics World. Retrieved 9 April 2022. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Wood, Charlie (7 April 2022). "Newly Measured Particle Seems Heavy Enough to Break Known Physics". Quanta Magazine. Retrieved 9 April 2022. 
  16. Marc, Tracy (7 April 2022). "CDF collaboration at Fermilab announces most precise ever measurement of W boson mass to be in tension with the Standard Model". Fermilab. Retrieved 8 April 2022. 
  17. Schott, Matthias (2022-04-07). "Do we have finally found new physics with the latest W boson mass measurement?". 
  18. Ouellette, Jennifer (24 March 2023). "New value for W boson mass dims 2022 hints of physics beyond Standard Model". 
  19. "Improved W boson Mass Measurement using $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV Proton-Proton Collisions with the ATLAS Detector". CERN. 22 March 2023. 
  20. "Compatibility and combination of world W-boson mass measurements". 18 Aug 2023. 
  21. Beringer, J. (2012). "Gauge and Higgs bosons". Physical Review D. 2012 Review of Particle Physics 86 (1): 1. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.010001. Bibcode2012PhRvD..86a0001B. Retrieved 2013-10-21. 
  22. Amsler, C. (2010). "PL B667, 1 (2008), and 2009 partial update for the 2010 edition". 
  23. Sirunyan, A.M. (2018). "Observation of the Z → ψ ℓ+ ℓ− decay in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV". Physical Review Letters 121 (14): 141801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.141801. PMID 30339440. 

External links