Astronomy:Timeline of cosmological theories

From HandWiki
Revision as of 14:28, 8 February 2024 by Gametune (talk | contribs) (linkage)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Timeline of theories about physical cosmology

This timeline of cosmological theories and discoveries is a chronological record of the development of humanity's understanding of the cosmos over the last two-plus millennia. Modern cosmological ideas follow the development of the scientific discipline of physical cosmology.

For millennia, what today is known to be the Solar System was regarded as the contents of the "whole universe", so advances in the knowledge of both mostly paralleled. Clear distinction was not made until circa mid-17th century. See Timeline of Solar System astronomy for further details on this side.

Antiquity

  • c. 16th century BCE – Mesopotamian cosmology has a flat, circular Earth enclosed in a cosmic ocean.[1]
  • c. 15th–11th century BCE – The Rigveda of Hinduism has some cosmological hymns, particularly in the late book 10, notably the Nasadiya Sukta which describes the origin of the universe, originating from the monistic Hiranyagarbha or "Golden Egg". Primal matter remains manifest for 311.04 trillion years and unmanifest for an equal length. The universe remains manifest for 4.32 billion years and unmanifest for an equal length. Innumerable universes exist simultaneously. These cycles have and will last forever, driven by desires.
Early Hebrew conception of the cosmos.[citation needed] The firmament, Sheol and tehom are depicted.
  • 6th century BCE – The Babylonian Map of the World shows the Earth surrounded by the cosmic ocean, with seven islands arranged around it so as to form a seven-pointed star. Contemporary Biblical cosmology reflects the same view of a flat, circular Earth swimming on water and overarched by the solid vault of the firmament to which are fastened the stars.
  • 6th–4th century BCE – Greek philosophers, as early as Anaximander,[2] introduce the idea of multiple or even infinite universes.[3] Democritus further detailed that these worlds varied in distance, size; the presence, number and size of their suns and moons; and that they are subject to destructive collisions.[4] Also during this time period, the Greeks established that the Earth is spherical rather than flat.[5][6]
  • 6th century BCE – Anaximander conceives a mechanical, non-mythological model of the world: the Earth floats very still in the centre of the infinite, not supported by anything.[7] Its curious shape is that of a cylinder[8] with a height one-third of its diameter. The flat top forms the inhabited world, which is surrounded by a circular oceanic mass. Anaximander considered the Sun as a huge object (larger than the land of Peloponnesus[9]), and consequently, he realized how far from Earth it might be. In his system the celestial bodies turned at different distances. At the origin, after the separation of hot and cold, a ball of flame appeared that surrounded Earth like bark on a tree. This ball broke apart to form the rest of the Universe. It resembled a system of hollow concentric wheels, filled with fire, with the rims pierced by holes like those of a flute. Consequently, the Sun was the fire that one could see through a hole the same size as the Earth on the farthest wheel, and an eclipse corresponded with the occlusion of that hole. The diameter of the solar wheel was twenty-seven times that of the Earth (or twenty-eight, depending on the sources)[10] and the lunar wheel, whose fire was less intense, eighteen (or nineteen) times. Its hole could change shape, thus explaining lunar phases. The stars and the planets, located closer,[11] followed the same model.[12]
  • 5th century BCE – Parmenides is credited to be the first Greek who declared that the Earth is spherical and is situated in the centre of the universe.[13]
  • 5th century BCE – Pythagoreans as Philolaus believed the motion of planets is caused by an out-of-sight "fire" at the centre of the universe (not the Sun) that powers them, and Sun and Earth orbit that Central Fire at different distances. The Earth's inhabited side is always opposite to the Central Fire, rendering it invisible to people. They also claimed that the Moon and the planets orbit the Earth.[14] This model depicts a moving Earth, simultaneously self-rotating and orbiting around an external point (but not around the Sun), thus not being geocentrical, contrary to common intuition. Due to philosophical concerns about the number 10 (a "perfect number" for the Pythagorians), they also added a tenth "hidden body" or Counter-Earth (Antichthon), always in the opposite side of the invisible Central Fire and therefore also invisible from Earth.[15]
  • 4th century BCE – Plato claimed in his Timaeus that circles and spheres are the preferred shape of the universe, that the Earth is at the center and is circled by, ordered in-to-outwards: Moon, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and finally the fixed stars located on the celestial sphere.[16] In Plato's complex cosmogony,[17] the demiurge gave the primacy to the motion of Sameness and left it undivided; but he divided the motion of Difference in six parts, to have seven unequal circles. He prescribed these circles to move in opposite directions, three of them with equal speeds, the others with unequal speeds, but always in proportion. These circles are the orbits of the heavenly bodies: the three moving at equal speeds are the Sun, Venus and Mercury, while the four moving at unequal speeds are the Moon, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn.[18][19] The complicated pattern of these movements is bound to be repeated again after a period called a 'complete' or 'perfect' year.[20] However, others like Philolaus and Hicetas had rejected geocentrism.[21]
  • 4th century BCE – Eudoxus of Cnidus devised a geometric-mathematical model for the movements of the planets, the first known effort in this sense, based on (conceptual) concentric spheres centered on Earth.[22] To explain the complexity of the movements of the planets along with that of the Sun and the Moon, Eudoxus thought they move as if they were attached to a number of concentrical, invisible spheres, every of them rotating around its own and different axis and at different paces. His model had twenty-seven homocentric spheres with each sphere explaining a type of observable motion for each celestial object. Eudoxus emphasised that this is a purely mathematical construct of the model in the sense that the spheres of each celestial body do not exist, it just shows the possible positions of the bodies.[23] His model was later refined and expanded by Callippus.
Geocentric celestial spheres; Peter Apian's Cosmographia (Antwerp, 1539)
  • 4th century BCE – Aristotle follows the Plato's Earth-centered universe in which the Earth is stationary and the cosmos (or universe) is finite in extent but infinite in time. He argued for a spherical Earth using lunar eclipses[24] and other observations. Aristotle adopted and expanded even more the previous Eudoxus' and Callippus' model, but by supposing the spheres were material and crystalline.[25] Aristotle also tried to determine whether the Earth moves and concluded that all the celestial bodies fall towards Earth by natural tendency and since Earth is the centre of that tendency, it is stationary.[26] Plato seems to have obscurely argued that the universe did have a beginning, but Aristotle and others interpreted his words differently.[27]
  • 4th century BCE – De Mundo – Five elements, situated in spheres in five regions, the less being in each case surrounded by the greater – namely, earth surrounded by water, water by air, air by fire, and fire by aether – make up the whole Universe.[28]
  • 4th century BCE – Heraclides Ponticus is said to be the first Greek who proposes that the Earth rotates on its axis, from west to east, once every 24 hours, contradicting Aristotle's teachings. Simplicius says that Heraclides proposed that the irregular movements of the planets can be explained if the Earth moves while the Sun stays still,[29] but these statements are disputed.[30]
  • 3rd century BCE – Aristarchus of Samos proposes a Sun-centered universe and Earth's rotation in its own axis. He also provides evidences for his theory from his own observations.[31]
  • 3rd century BCE – Archimedes in his essay The Sand Reckoner, estimates the diameter of the cosmos to be the equivalent in stadia of what would in modern times be called two light years, if Aristarcus' theories were correct.
  • 2nd century BCE – Seleucus of Seleucia elaborates on Aristarchus' heliocentric universe, using the phenomenon of tides to explain heliocentrism. Seleucus was the first to prove the heliocentric system through reasoning. Seleucus' arguments for a heliocentric cosmology were probably related to the phenomenon of tides. According to Strabo (1.1.9), Seleucus was the first to state that the tides are due to the attraction of the Moon, and that the height of the tides depends on the Moon's position relative to the Sun. Alternatively, he may have proved heliocentricity by determining the constants of a geometric model for it.[32]
  • 2nd century BCE – Apollonius of Perga shows the equivalence of two descriptions of the apparent retrograde planet motions (assuming the geocentric model), one using eccentrics and another deferent and epicycles.[33] The latter will be a key feature for future models. The epicycle is described as a small orbit within a greater one, called the deferent: as a planet orbits the Earth, it also orbits the original orbit, so its trajectory resembles a curve known as an epitrochoid. This could explain how the planet seems to move as viewed from Earth.
  • 2nd century BCE – Eratosthenes determines that the radius of the Earth is roughly 6,400 km.[34]
  • 2nd century BCE – Hipparchus uses parallax to determine that the distance to the Moon is roughly 380,000 km.[35] The work of Hipparchus about the Earth-Moon system was so accurate that he could forecast solar and lunar eclipses for the next six centuries. Also, he discovers the precession of the equinoxes, and compiles a star catalog of about 850 entries.[36]
  • c. 2nd century BCE–3rd century CE – In Hindu cosmology, the Manusmriti (1.67–80) and Puranas describe time as cyclical, with a new universe (planets and life) created by Brahma every 8.64 billion years. The universe is created, maintained, and destroyed within a kalpa (day of Brahma) period lasting for 4.32 billion years, and is followed by a pralaya (night) period of partial dissolution equal in duration. In some Puranas (e.g. Bhagavata Purana), a larger cycle of time is described where matter (mahat-tattva or universal womb) is created from primal matter (prakriti) and root matter (pradhana) every 622.08 trillion years, from which Brahma is born.[37] The elements of the universe are created, used by Brahma, and fully dissolved within a maha-kalpa (life of Brahma; 100 of his 360-day years) period lasting for 311.04 trillion years containing 36,000 kalpas (days) and pralayas (nights), and is followed by a maha-pralaya period of full dissolution equal in duration.[38][39][40][41] The texts also speak of innumerable worlds or universes.[42]
  • 2nd century CE – Ptolemy proposes an Earth-centered universe, with the Sun, Moon, and visible planets revolving around the Earth. Based on Apollonius' epicycles,[43] he calculates the positions, orbits and positional equations of the Heavenly bodies along with instruments to measure these quantities. Ptolemy emphasised that the epicycle motion does not apply to the Sun. His main contribution to the model was the equant points. He also re-arranged the heavenly spheres in a different order than Plato did (from Earth outward): Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and fixed stars, following a long astrological tradition and the decreasing orbital periods. His book The Almagest, which also cataloged 1,022 stars and other astronomical objects (largely based upon Hipparchus'), remained the most authoritative text on astronomy and largest astronomical catalogue until the 17th century.[44][45]

Middle Ages

  • 2nd century CE-5th century CE – Jain cosmology considers the loka, or universe, as an uncreated entity, existing since infinity, the shape of the universe as similar to a man standing with legs apart and arm resting on his waist. This Universe, according to Jainism, is broad at the top, narrow at the middle and once again becomes broad at the bottom.
  • 5th century (or earlier) – Buddhist texts speak of "hundreds of thousands of billions, countlessly, innumerably, boundlessly, incomparably, incalculably, unspeakably, inconceivably, immeasurably, inexplicably many worlds" to the east, and "infinite worlds in the ten directions".[46][47]
  • 5th century – Several Indian astronomers propose a rudimentary Sun-centered universe, including Aryabhata. He also writes a treatise on motion of planets, Sun and Moon and stars. Aryabhatta puts forward the theory of rotation of the Earth in its own axis and explained day and night was caused by the diurnal rotation of the Earth. He also provided empirical evidence for his notion from his astronomical experiments and observation.[48]
  • 5th century – The Jewish talmud gives an argument for finite universe theory along with explanation.
Naboth's representation of Martianus Capella's geo-heliocentric astronomical model (1573)
  • 5th centuryMartianus Capella describes a modified geocentric model, in which the Earth is at rest in the center of the universe and circled by the Moon, the Sun, three planets and the stars, while Mercury and Venus circle the Sun, all surrounded by the sphere of fixed stars.[49]
  • 6th century – John Philoponus proposes a universe that is finite in time and argues against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite universe
  • 7th century – The Quran says in Chapter 21: Verse 30 – "Have those who disbelieved not considered that the Heavens and the Earth were a joined entity, and We separated them".
  • 9th–12th centuries – Al-Kindi (Alkindus), Saadia Gaon (Saadia ben Joseph) and Al-Ghazali (Algazel) support a universe that has a finite past and develop two logical arguments for the notion.
  • 12th century – Fakhr al-Din al-Razi discusses Islamic cosmology, rejects Aristotle's idea of an Earth-centered universe, and, in the context of his commentary on the Quranic verse, "All praise belongs to God, Lord of the Worlds," and proposes that the universe has more than "a thousand worlds beyond this world."[50]
  • 12th century – Robert Grosseteste described the birth of the Universe in an explosion and the crystallisation of matter. He also put forward several new ideas such as rotation of the Earth around its axis and the cause of day and night. His treatise De Luce is the first attempt to describe the heavens and Earth using a single set of physical laws.[51]
  • 14th century – Jewish astronomer Levi ben Gershon (Gersonides) estimates the distance to the outermost orb of the fixed stars to be no less than 159,651,513,380,944 Earth radii, or about 100,000 light-years in modern units.[52]
  • 14th century – Several European mathematicians and astronomers develop the theory of Earth's rotation including Nicole Oresme. Oresme also give logical reasoning, empirical evidence and mathematical proofs for his notion.[53][54]
  • 15th century – Nicholas of Cusa proposes that the Earth rotates on its axis in his book, On Learned Ignorance (1440).[55] Like Oresme, he also wrote about the possibility of the plurality of worlds.[56]

Renaissance

  • 1501 – Indian astronomer Nilakantha Somayaji proposes a universe in which the planets orbit the Sun, but the Sun orbits the Earth.[57]
Andreas Cellarius's illustration of the Copernican system, from the Harmonia Macrocosmica
  • 1543 – Nicolaus Copernicus publishes his heliocentric universe in his De revolutionibus orbium coelestium.[58]
  • 1576 – Thomas Digges modifies the Copernican system by removing its outer edge and replacing the edge with a star-filled unbounded space.[59]
  • 1584 – Giordano Bruno proposes a non-hierarchical cosmology, wherein the Copernican Solar System is not the center of the universe, but rather, a relatively insignificant star system, amongst an infinite multitude of others.[60]
  • 1588 – Tycho Brahe publishes his own Tychonic system, a blend between Ptolemy's classical geocentric model and Copernicus' heliocentric model, in which the Sun and the Moon revolve around the Earth, in the center of universe, and all other planets revolve around the Sun.[61] It is a geo-heliocentric model similar to that described by Somayaji.
  • 1600 – William Gilbert rejects the idea of a limiting sphere of the fixed stars for which no proof has been offered.[62]
  • 1609 – Galileo Galilei examines the skies and constellations through a telescope and concluded that the "fixed stars" which had been studied and mapped were only a tiny portion of the massive universe that lay beyond the reach of the naked eye.[63] When in 1610 he aimed his telescope to the faint strip of the Milky Way, he found it resolves into countless white star-like spots, presumably farther stars themselves.[64]
  • 1610 – Johannes Kepler uses the dark night sky to argue for a finite universe. Shortly after, it was proved by Kepler himself that the Jupiter's moons move around the planet the same way planets orbit the Sun, thus making Kepler's laws universal.[65]

Enlightenment to Victorian Era

  • 1672 – Jean Richer and Giovanni Domenico Cassini measure the Earth-Sun distance, the astronomical unit, to be about 138,370,000 km.[66] Later it will be refined by others up to the current value of 149,597,870 km.
  • 1675 – Ole Rømer uses the orbital mechanics of Jupiter's moons to estimate that the speed of light is about 227,000 km/s.[67]
  • 1687 – Isaac Newton's laws describe large-scale motion throughout the universe. The universal force of gravity suggested that stars could not simply be fixed or at rest, as their gravitational pulls cause "mutual attraction" and therefore cause them to move in relation to each other.[68]
  • 1704 – John Locke enters the term "Solar System" in the English language, when he used it to refer to the Sun, planets, and comets as a whole.[69] By then it had been stablished beyond doubt that planets are other worlds, and stars are other distant suns, so the whole Solar System is actually only a small part of an immensely large universe, and definitively something distinct.
  • 1718 – Edmund Halley discovers proper motion of stars, dispelling the concept of the "fixed stars".[70]
  • 1720 – Edmund Halley puts forth an early form of Olbers' paradox.
  • 1729 – James Bradley discovers the aberration of light, which proved the Earth's motion around the Sun,[71] and also provides a more accurate method to compute the speed of light closer to its actual value of about 300,000 km/s.
  • 1744 – Jean-Philippe de Cheseaux puts forth an early form of Olbers' paradox.
  • 1755 – Immanuel Kant asserts that the nebulae are really galaxies separate from, independent of, and outside the Milky Way Galaxy; he calls them island universes.
William Herschel's model of the Milky Way, 1785
  • 1781 – Charles Messier and his assistant Pierre Méchain publish the first catalogue of 110 nebulae and star clusters, the most prominent deep-sky objects that can easily be observed from Earth's Northern Hemisphere, in order not to be confused with ordinary Solar System's comets.[72]
  • 1785 – William Herschel proposes a heliocentric model of the universe that Earth's Sun is at or near the center of the universe, which at the time was assumed to only be the Milky Way Galaxy.[73]
  • 1791 – Erasmus Darwin pens the first description of a cyclical expanding and contracting universe in his poem The Economy of Vegetation.
  • 1796 – Pierre Laplace re-states the nebular hypothesis for the formation of the Solar System from a spinning nebula of gas and dust.[74]
  • 1826 – Heinrich Wilhelm Olbers puts forth Olbers' paradox.
  • 1832–1838 – Following over 100 years of unsuccessful attempts, Thomas Henderson,[75] Friedrich Bessel,[76] and Otto Struve measure the parallax of a few nearby stars; these are the first measurements of any distances outside the Solar System.
One of Andrew Ainslie Common's 1883 photographs of the Orion nebula, the first to show that a long exposure could record stars and nebulae invisible to the human eye.

1901–1950

The earliest known photograph of the Great Andromeda "Nebula" (with M110 to upper left), by Isaac Roberts, 1899.
  • 1904 – Ernest Rutherford argues, in a lecture attended by Kelvin, that radioactive decay releases heat, providing the unknown energy source Kelvin had suggested, and ultimately leading to radiometric dating of rocks which reveals ages of billions of years for the Solar System bodies, hence the Sun and all the stars.[83]
  • 1905 – Albert Einstein publishes the Special Theory of Relativity, positing that space and time are not separate continua, and demonstrating that mass and energy are interchangeable.
  • 1912 – Henrietta Leavitt discovers the period-luminosity law for Cepheid variable stars, which becomes a crucial step in measuring distances to other galaxies.
  • 1913 – Niels Bohr publishes the Bohr model of the atom, which explains the spectral lines, and definitively established the quantum mechanics behaviour of the matter.[84]
  • 1915 – Robert Innes discovers Proxima Centauri, the closest star to Earth after the Sun.[85]
  • 1915 – Albert Einstein publishes the General Theory of Relativity, showing that an energy density warps spacetime.
  • 1917 – Willem de Sitter derives an isotropic static cosmology with a cosmological constant, as well as an empty expanding cosmology with a cosmological constant, termed a de Sitter universe.
  • 1918 – Harlow Shapley's work on globular clusters showed that the heliocentrism model of cosmology was wrong, and galactocentrism replaced heliocentrism as the dominant model of cosmology.[73]
  • 1919 – Arthur Stanley Eddington uses a solar eclipse to successfully test Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.[86]
  • 1920 – The Shapley-Curtis Debate, on the distances to spiral nebulae, takes place at the Smithsonian.
  • 1921 – The National Research Council (NRC) published the official transcript of the Shapley-Curtis Debate. Galaxies are finally recognized as objects beyond the Milky Way, and the Milky Way as a galaxy proper.[87]
  • 1922 – Vesto Slipher summarizes his findings on the spiral nebulae's systematic redshifts.
  • 1922 – Alexander Friedmann finds a solution to the Einstein field equations which suggests a general expansion of space.
  • 1923 – Edwin Hubble measures distances to a few nearby spiral nebulae (galaxies), the Andromeda Galaxy (M31), Triangulum Galaxy (M33), and NGC 6822. The distances place them far outside the Milky Way, and implies that fainter galaxies are much more distant, and the universe is composed of many thousands of galaxies.
  • 1924 – Louis de Broglie asserts that moderately accelerated electrons must show an associated wave.[88] This was later confirmed by the Davisson–Germer experiment in 1927.[89]
  • 1927 – Georges Lemaître discusses the creation event of an expanding universe governed by the Einstein field equations. From its solutions to the Einstein equations, he predicts the distance-redshift relation.
  • 1928 – Paul Dirac realises that his relativistic version of the Schrödinger wave equation for electrons predicts the possibility of antielectrons, and hence antimatter.[90] This was confirmed in 1932 by Carl D. Anderson.[91]
  • 1928 – Howard P. Robertson briefly mentions that Vesto Slipher's redshift measurements combined with brightness measurements of the same galaxies indicate a redshift-distance relation.
Three steps to the Hubble constant[92]
  • 1929 – Edwin Hubble demonstrates the linear redshift-distance relationship and thus shows the expansion of the universe.
  • 1932 – Karl Guthe Jansky recognizes received radio signals coming from outer space as extrasolar, coming mainly from Sagittarius.[93] They are the first evidence of the center of the Milky Way, and the firsts experiences that founded the discipline of radio astronomy.
  • 1933 – Edward Milne names and formalizes the cosmological principle.
  • 1933 – Fritz Zwicky shows that the Coma cluster of galaxies contains large amounts of dark matter. This result agrees with modern measurements, but is generally ignored until the 1970s.
  • 1934 – Georges Lemaître interprets the cosmological constant as due to a vacuum energy with an unusual perfect fluid equation of state.
  • 1938 – Hans Bethe calculates the details of the two main energy-producing nuclear reactions that power the stars.[94][95]
  • 1938 – Paul Dirac suggests the large numbers hypothesis, that the gravitational constant may be small because it is decreasing slowly with time.
  • 1948 – Ralph Alpher, Hans Bethe ("in absentia"), and George Gamow examine element synthesis in a rapidly expanding and cooling universe, and suggest that the elements were produced by rapid neutron capture.
  • 1948 – Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle propose steady state cosmologies based on the perfect cosmological principle.
  • 1948 – George Gamow predicts the existence of the cosmic microwave background radiation by considering the behavior of primordial radiation in an expanding universe.
  • 1950 – Fred Hoyle coins the term "Big Bang", saying that it was not derisive; it was just a striking image meant to highlight the difference between that and the Steady-State model.

1951–2000

  • 1961 – Robert Dicke argues that carbon-based life can only arise when the gravitational force is small, because this is when burning stars exist; first use of the weak anthropic principle.
  • 1963 – Maarten Schmidt discovers the first quasar; these soon provide a probe of the universe back to substantial redshifts.
  • 1965 – Hannes Alfvén proposes the now-discounted concept of ambiplasma to explain baryon asymmetry and supports the idea of an infinite universe.
  • 1965 – Martin Rees and Dennis Sciama analyze quasar source count data and discover that the quasar density increases with redshift.
  • 1965 – Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, astronomers at Bell Labs discover the 2.7 K microwave background radiation, which earns them the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics. Robert Dicke, James Peebles, Peter Roll and David Todd Wilkinson interpret it as a relic from the Big Bang.
The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array, a radio interferometer in New Mexico, United States .
  • 1966 – Stephen Hawking and George Ellis show that any plausible general relativistic cosmology is singular.
  • 1966 – James Peebles shows that the hot Big Bang predicts the correct helium abundance.
  • 1967 – Andrei Sakharov presents the requirements for baryogenesis, a baryon-antibaryon asymmetry in the universe.
  • 1967 – John Bahcall, Wal Sargent, and Maarten Schmidt measure the fine-structure splitting of spectral lines in 3C191 and thereby show that the fine-structure constant does not vary significantly with time.
  • 1967 – Robert Wagner, William Fowler, and Fred Hoyle show that the hot Big Bang predicts the correct deuterium and lithium abundances.
  • 1968 – Brandon Carter speculates that perhaps the fundamental constants of nature must lie within a restricted range to allow the emergence of life; first use of the strong anthropic principle.
  • 1969 – Charles Misner formally presents the Big Bang horizon problem.
  • 1969 – Robert Dicke formally presents the Big Bang flatness problem.
  • 1970 – Vera Rubin and Kent Ford measure spiral galaxy rotation curves at large radii, showing evidence for substantial amounts of dark matter.
  • 1973 – Edward Tryon proposes that the universe may be a large scale quantum mechanical vacuum fluctuation where positive mass-energy is balanced by negative gravitational potential energy.
  • 1976 – Alexander Shlyakhter uses samarium ratios from the Oklo prehistoric natural nuclear fission reactor in Gabon to show that some laws of physics have remained unchanged for over two billion years.
  • 1977 – Gary Steigman, David Schramm, and James Gunn examine the relation between the primordial helium abundance and number of neutrinos and claim that at most five lepton families can exist.
  • 1980 – Alan Guth and Alexei Starobinsky independently propose the inflationary Big Bang universe as a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems.
  • 1981 – Viatcheslav Mukhanov and G. Chibisov propose that quantum fluctuations could lead to large scale structure in an inflationary universe.
  • 1982 – The first CfA galaxy redshift survey is completed.
  • 1982 – Several groups including James Peebles, J. Richard Bond and George Blumenthal propose that the universe is dominated by cold dark matter.
  • 1983–1987  – The first large computer simulations of cosmic structure formation are run by Davis, Efstathiou, Frenk and White. The results show that cold dark matter produces a reasonable match to observations, but hot dark matter does not.
The sky at energies above 100 MeV observed by the Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) of the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO) satellite (1991–2000).
  • 1988 – The CfA2 Great Wall is discovered in the CfA2 redshift survey.
  • 1988 – Measurements of galaxy large-scale flows provide evidence for the Great Attractor.
  • 1990 – The Hubble Space Telescope is launched.[96] It is aimed primarily at deep-space objects.
  • 1990 – Preliminary results from NASA's COBE mission confirm the cosmic microwave background radiation has a blackbody spectrum to an astonishing one part in 105 precision, thus eliminating the possibility of an integrated starlight model proposed for the background by steady state enthusiasts.
  • 1992 – Further COBE measurements discover the very small anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background, providing a "baby picture" of the seeds of large-scale structure when the universe was around 1/1100th of its present size and 380,000 years old.
  • 1992 – First planetary system beyond the Solar System detected, around the pulsar PSR B1257+12.[97]
  • 1995 – The first planet around a Sun-like star is discovered, in orbit around the star 51 Pegasi.[98]
  • 1996 – The first Hubble Deep Field is released, providing a clear view of very distant galaxies when the universe was around one-third of its present age.
  • 1998 – Controversial evidence for the fine-structure constant varying over the lifetime of the universe is first published.
  • 1998 – The Supernova Cosmology Project and High-Z Supernova Search Team discover cosmic acceleration based on distances to Type Ia supernovae, providing the first direct evidence for a non-zero cosmological constant.
  • 1999 – Measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation with finer resolution than COBE, (most notably by the BOOMERanG experiment see Mauskopf et al., 1999, Melchiorri et al., 1999, de Bernardis et al. 2000) provide evidence for oscillations (the first acoustic peak) in the anisotropy angular spectrum, as expected in the standard model of cosmological structure formation. The angular position of this peak indicates that the geometry of the universe is close to flat.

2001–present

  • 2001 – The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dF) by an Australian/British team gave strong evidence that the matter density is near 25% of critical density. Together with the CMB results for a flat universe, this provides independent evidence for a cosmological constant or similar dark energy.
  • 2002 – The Cosmic Background Imager (CBI) in Chile obtained images of the cosmic microwave background radiation with the highest angular resolution of 4 arc minutes. It also obtained the anisotropy spectrum at high-resolution not covered before up to l ~ 3000. It found a slight excess in power at high-resolution (l > 2500) not yet completely explained, the so-called "CBI-excess".
  • 2003 – NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) obtained full-sky detailed pictures of the cosmic microwave background radiation. The images can be interpreted to indicate that the universe is 13.7 billion years old (within one percent error), and are very consistent with the Lambda-CDM model and the density fluctuations predicted by inflation.
Cosmic microwave background as measured by the Cosmic Background Imager experiment.

See also

Physical cosmology

Historical development of hypotheses

Belief systems

Others

References

  1. Horowitz (1998), p. xii
  2. This is a matter of debate:
  3. "there are innumerable worlds of different sizes. In some there is neither sun nor moon, in others they are larger than in ours and others have more than one. These worlds are at irregular distances, more in one direction and less in another, and some are flourishing, others declining. Here they come into being, there they die, and they are destroyed by collision with one another. Some of the worlds have no animal or vegetable life nor any water."
  4. "Ancient Greek Astronomy and Cosmology | Modeling the Cosmos | Articles and Essays | Finding Our Place in the Cosmos: From Galileo to Sagan and Beyond | Digital Collections | Library of Congress". Washington, DC. https://www.loc.gov/collections/finding-our-place-in-the-cosmos-with-carl-sagan/articles-and-essays/modeling-the-cosmos/ancient-greek-astronomy-and-cosmology. 
  5. Blakemore, Erin. "Christopher Columbus Never Set Out to Prove the Earth was Round" (in en). https://www.history.com/news/christopher-columbus-never-set-out-to-prove-the-earth-was-round. 
  6. Aristotle, On the Heavens, ii, 13
  7. "A column of stone", Aetius reports in De Fide (III, 7, 1), or "similar to a pillar-shaped stone", pseudo-Plutarch (III, 10).
  8. Sider, D. (1973). "Anaxagoras on the Size of the Sun". Classical Philology 68 (2): 128–129. doi:10.1086/365951. 
  9. In Refutation, it is reported that the circle of the Sun is twenty-seven times bigger than the Moon.
  10. Aetius, De Fide (II, 15, 6)
  11. Most of Anaximander's model of the Universe comes from pseudo-Plutarch (II, 20–28):
    "[The Sun] is a circle twenty-eight times as big as the Earth, with the outline similar to that of a fire-filled chariot wheel, on which appears a mouth in certain places and through which it exposes its fire, as through the hole on a flute. [...] the Sun is equal to the Earth, but the circle on which it breathes and on which it's borne is twenty-seven times as big as the whole earth. [...] [The eclipse] is when the mouth from which comes the fire heat is closed. [...] [The Moon] is a circle nineteen times as big as the whole earth, all filled with fire, like that of the Sun".
  12. Wikisource-logo.svg Laërtius, Diogenes (1925). "Others: Parmenides". Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. 2:9 (Two volume ed.). Loeb Classical Library. 
  13. Thurston, Hugh (1994). Early astronomy. New York: Springer-Verlag New York. p. 111. ISBN 0-387-94107-X. 
  14. Dreyer, John Louis Emil (1906). History of the planetary systems from Thales to Kepler. p. 42. https://books.google.com/books?id=OgRAAQAAIAAJ&q=counter-earth+Antichthon+mysterious&pg=PA42. "To complete the number ten, Philolaus created the antichthon, or counter-earth. This tenth planet is always invisible to us, because it is between us and the central fire and always keeps pace with the Earth." 
  15. Pedersen, Olaf (1993). Early physics and astronomy. A historical introduction. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-40340-5. 
  16. "The components from which he made the soul and the way in which he made it were as follows: In between the Being that is indivisible and always changeless, and the one that is divisible and comes to be in the corporeal realm, he mixed a third, intermediate form of being, derived from the other two. Similarly, he made a mixture of the Same, and then one of the Different, in between their indivisible and their corporeal, divisible counterparts. And he took the three mixtures and mixed them together to make a uniform mixture, forcing the Different, which was hard to mix, into conformity with the Same. Now when he had mixed these two with Being, and from the three had made a single mixture, he redivided the whole mixture into as many parts as his task required, each part remaining a mixture of the Same, the Different and Being." (35a-b), translation Donald J. Zeyl
  17. Plato, Timaeus, 36c
  18. Plato, Timaeus, 36d
  19. Plato, Timaeus, 39d
  20. Encyclopædia Britannica (2019). "heliocentrism | Definition, History, & Facts" (in en). Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/heliocentrism. 
  21. Yavetz, Ido (February 1998). "On the Homocentric Spheres of Eudoxus". Archive for History of Exact Sciences 52 (3): 222–225. doi:10.1007/s004070050017. Bibcode1998AHES...52..222Y. 
  22. Crowe, Michael (2001). Theories of the World from Antiquity to the Copernican Revolution. Mineola, NY: Dover. p. 23. ISBN 0-486-41444-2. 
  23. De caelo, 297b31–298a10
  24. Easterling, H (1961). "Homocentric Spheres in De Caelo". Phronesis 6 (2): 138–141. doi:10.1163/156852861x00161. 
  25. Thurston, Hugh (1994). Early astronomy. New York: Springer-Verlag New York. p. 118. ISBN 0-387-94107-X. 
  26. Sorabji, Richard (2005) (in en). The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: Physics. Cornell University Press. p. 175. ISBN 978-0-8014-8988-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=0QpQw8JDgQcC&pg=PA175. 
  27. Aristotle; Forster, E. S. (Edward Seymour); Dobson, J. F. (John Frederic) (1914). De Mundo. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. p. 2. https://archive.org/details/demundoarisrich. 
  28. Simplicius (2003). "Physics 2". On Aristotle's. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. pp. 48. https://archive.org/details/onaristotlescate00simp. 
  29. Eastwood, Bruce (1992). "Heraclides and Heliocentrism: Texts, Diagrams, and Interpretations". Journal for the History of Astronomy 23 (4): 253. doi:10.1177/002182869202300401. Bibcode1992JHA....23..233E. 
  30. D., J. L. E. (July 1913). "Aristarchus of Samos: The Ancient Copernicus" (in en). Nature 91 (2281): 499–500. doi:10.1038/091499a0. ISSN 1476-4687. Bibcode1913Natur..91..499J. https://www.nature.com/articles/091499a0. 
  31. "Aristarchus of Samos (310-230 BC) | High Altitude Observatory". https://www2.hao.ucar.edu/Education/FamousSolarPhysicists/aristarchus-samos&ved=2ahUKEwjm_LjLutX4AhWD4TgGHZO1Ae4QFnoECDgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1vXstqc1q1ZR7yMV6oBBAB. 
  32. Carrol, Bradley and Ostlie, Dale, An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, 2007. pp. 4
  33. Russo, Lucio (2004). The forgotten revolution : how science was born in 300 BC and why it had to be reborn. Berlin: Springer. pp. 68. ISBN 3-540-20396-6. OCLC 52945835. https://books.google.com/books?id=MOTpnfz7ZuYC. 
  34. G. J. Toomer, "Hipparchus on the distances of the sun and moon," Archive for History of Exact Sciences 14 (1974), 126–142.
  35. Alexander Jones "Ptolemy in Perspective: Use and Criticism of his Work from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century, Springer, 2010, p.36.
  36. "Mahattattva, Mahat-tattva: 5 definitions". February 10, 2021. https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/mahattattva. "Mahattattva (महत्तत्त्व) or simply Mahat refers to a primordial principle of the nature of both pradhāna and puruṣa, according to the 10th century Saurapurāṇa: one of the various Upapurāṇas depicting Śaivism.—[...] From the disturbed prakṛti and the puruṣa sprang up the seed of mahat, which is of the nature of both pradhāna and puruṣa. The mahattattva is then covered by the pradhāna and being so covered it differentiates itself as the sāttvika, rājasa and tāmasa-mahat. The pradhāna covers the mahat just as a seed is covered by the skin. Being so covered there spring from the three fold mahat the threefold ahaṃkāra called vaikārika, taijasa and bhūtādi or tāmasa." 
  37. "Ch. 1.2.4 Time Measurements". Units of Measurement: Past, Present and Future. International System of Units. Springer Series in Materials Science: 122. Springer. 2010. pp. 7–8. ISBN 9783642007378. https://books.google.com/books?id=pHiKycrLmEQC&pg=PA7. 
  38. The Power of Stars (2nd ed.). Springer. 2017. p. 182. ISBN 9783319525976. https://books.google.com/books?id=pQHNDgAAQBAJ. 
  39. Johnson, W.J. (2009). A Dictionary of Hinduism. Oxford University Press. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-19-861025-0. 
  40. Fernandez, Elizabeth. "The Multiverse And Eastern Philosophy" (in en). https://www.forbes.com/sites/fernandezelizabeth/2020/01/12/the-multiverse-and-eastern-philosophy/. 
  41. North, John (1995). The Norton History of Astronomy and Cosmology. New York: W.W.Norton & Company, Inc.. p. 115. ISBN 0-393-03656-1. https://archive.org/details/nortonhistoryofa0000nort/page/115. 
  42. jones, prudence (2011-01-01), "Ptolemy" (in en), Dictionary of African Biography (Oxford University Press), doi:10.1093/acref/9780195382075.001.0001, ISBN 978-0-19-538207-5, https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195382075.001.0001/acref-9780195382075-e-1700, retrieved 2022-11-09 
  43. Swerdlow, N. M. (February 2021). "The Almagest in the Manner of Euclid" (in en). Journal for the History of Astronomy 52 (1): 104–107. doi:10.1177/0021828620977214. ISSN 0021-8286. Bibcode2021JHA....52..104S. 
  44. Jackson, Roger; Makransky, John (2013) (in en). Buddhist Theology: Critical Reflections by Contemporary Buddhist Scholars. Routledge. p. 118. ISBN 978-1-136-83012-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=YdhcAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA118. 
  45. Reat, N. Ross; Perry, Edmund F. (1991) (in en). A World Theology: The Central Spiritual Reality of Humankind. Cambridge University Press. p. 112. ISBN 978-0-521-33159-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=vD2TJNc7NE4C&pg=PA112. 
  46. India, Digital Branding Learners (2019-01-01). "Aryabhatta and the great Indian Mathematicians". Learners India. https://www.academia.edu/38561360. 
  47. Bruce S. Eastwood, Ordering the Heavens: Roman Astronomy and Cosmology in the Carolingian Renaissance (Leiden: Brill, 2007), pp. 238-9.
  48. Adi Setia (2004). "Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi on Physics and the Nature of the Physical World: A Preliminary Survey". Islam & Science 2. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0QYQ/is_2_2/ai_n9532826/. Retrieved 2010-03-02. 
  49. Lewis, Neil (2021), Zalta, Edward N., ed., Robert Grosseteste (Fall 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/grosseteste/, retrieved 2022-11-05 
  50. Kennedy, E. S. (1986-06-01). "The Astronomy of Levi ben Gerson (1288–1344): A Critical Edition of Chapters 1–20 with Translation and Commentary. Levi ben Gerson, Bernard R. Goldstein". Isis 77 (2): 371–372. doi:10.1086/354184. ISSN 0021-1753. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/354184. 
  51. Kirschner, Stefan (2021), Zalta, Edward N., ed., Nicole Oresme (Fall 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/nicole-oresme/, retrieved 2022-11-09 
  52. "Episode 11: The Legacy of Ptolemy's Almagest" (in en). 2022-09-28. https://www.aip.org/initialconditions/episode-11-legacy-ptolemys-almagest. 
  53. Hagen, J. (1911). "Nicholas of Cusa". The Catholic Encyclopedia. 11. Robert Appleton Company. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11060b.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-13. 
  54. Dick, Steven J. Plurality of Worlds: The Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant. Cambridge University Press (June 29, 1984). pgs 35-42.
  55. George G. Joseph (2000). The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics, p. 408. Princeton University Press.
  56. "Nicolaus Copernicus - University of Bologna" (in en). https://www.unibo.it/en/university/who-we-are/our-history/famous-people-and-students/nicolaus-copernicus. 
  57. Hellyer, Marcus, ed (2008). The Scientific Revolution: The Essential Readings. Blackwell Essential Readings in History. 7. John Wiley & Sons. p. 63. ISBN 9780470754771. https://books.google.com/books?id=1VhC63yV-WgC&pg=PA63. 
  58. Bruno, Giordano. "Third Dialogue". On the infinite universe and worlds. http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/brunoiuw3.htm. 
  59. Hatch, Robert. "Early Geo-Heliocentric models". Dr. Robert A. Hatch. http://users.clas.ufl.edu/ufhatch/pages/03-Sci-Rev/SCI-REV-Home/resource-ref-read/chief-systems/08-0TYCHO5-WSYS.html. 
  60. Gilbert, William (1893). "Book 6, Chapter III". De Magnete. (Facsimile). New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-26761-X. https://archive.org/details/williamgilbertof00gilb. 
  61. Taton, René; Wilson, Curtis (1989). Planetary astronomy from the Renaissance to the rise of astrophysics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-24254-1. OCLC 769917781. 
  62. Galileo Galilei, Sidereus Nuncius (Venice, (Italy): Thomas Baglioni, 1610), pages 15 and 16. English translation: Galileo Galilei with Edward Stafford Carlos, trans., The Sidereal Messenger (London: Rivingtons, 1880), pages 42 and 43.
  63. Christian Frisch, ed., Joannis Kepleri Astronomi Opera Omnia, vol. 6 (Frankfurt-am-Main, (Germany): Heyder & Zimmer, 1866), page 361.)
  64. ""Astronomical Unit," or Earth-Sun Distance, Gets an Overhaul". http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=astronomical-unit-or-earth-sun-distance-gets-an-overhaul. 
  65. Bobis, Laurence; Lequeux, James (2008). "Cassini, Rømer and the velocity of light". J. Astron. Hist. Herit. 11 (2): 97–105. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.2008.02.02. Bibcode2008JAHH...11...97B. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/2008JAHH...11...97B. 
  66. Bartusiak, Marcia (2004). Archives of the universe : a treasury of astronomy's historic works of discovery (1st ed.). New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN 0-375-42170-X. OCLC 54966424. https://archive.org/details/archivesofuniver0000unse. 
  67. "solar (adj.)". https://www.etymonline.com/word/solar. 
  68. Otto Neugebauer (1975). A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. Birkhäuser. p. 1084. ISBN 978-3-540-06995-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=vO5FCVIxz2YC&q=proper+motion+angle&pg=PA1085. 
  69. Bradley, James (1727–1728). "A Letter from the Reverend Mr. James Bradley Savilian Professor of Astronomy at Oxford, and F.R.S. to Dr.Edmond Halley Astronom. Reg. &c. Giving an Account of a New Discovered Motion of the Fix'd Stars.". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 35 (406): 637–661. doi:10.1098/rstl.1727.0064. Bibcode1727RSPT...35..637B. 
  70. "Original Messier Catalog of 1781". 10 November 2007. http://messier.seds.org/xtra/Mcat/mcat1781.html#messier1781. 
  71. 73.0 73.1 Berendzen, Richard (1975). "Geocentric to heliocentric to galactocentric to acentric: the continuing assault to the egocentric". Vistas in Astronomy 17 (1): 65–83. doi:10.1016/0083-6656(75)90049-5. Bibcode1975VA.....17...65B. 
  72. Owen, T. C. (2001) "Solar system: origin of the solar system", Encyclopædia Britannica, Deluxe CDROM edition
  73. Henderson, Thomas (1839). "On the Parallax of α Centauri". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 4 (19): 168–170. doi:10.1093/mnras/4.19.168. Bibcode1839MNRAS...4..168H. 
  74. Bessel, F. W. (1838b). "On the parallax of 61 Cygni". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 4 (17): 152–161. doi:10.1093/mnras/4.17.152. Bibcode1838MNRAS...4..152B. 
  75. Alec Eden The search for Christian Doppler, Springer-Verlag, Wien 1992. Contains a facsimile edition with an English translation.
  76. Fizeau: "Acoustique et optique". Lecture, Société Philomathique de Paris, 29 December 1848. According to Becker(pg. 109), this was never published, but recounted by M. Moigno(1850): "Répertoire d'optique moderne" (in French), vol 3. pp 1165–1203 and later in full by Fizeau, "Des effets du mouvement sur le ton des vibrations sonores et sur la longeur d'onde des rayons de lumière"; [Paris, 1870]. Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 19, 211–221.
  77. Wikisource-logo.svg Pohle, J. (1913). "Angelo Secchi". in Herbermann, Charles. Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. "[...][his] theory of the unity of the world and of the identity of the fixed stars and the sun received most profound scientific demonstration and confirmation.". 
  78. Michelson, Albert A.; Morley, Edward W. (1887). "On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether". American Journal of Science 34 (203): 333–345. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-34.203.333. Bibcode1887AmJS...34..333M. 
  79. Arabatzis, T. (2006). Representing Electrons: A Biographical Approach to Theoretical Entities. University of Chicago Press. pp. 70–74, 96. ISBN 978-0-226-02421-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=rZHT-chpLmAC&pg=PA70. Retrieved 2020-08-25. 
  80. Thomson, William (1862). "On the Age of the Sun's Heat". Macmillan's Magazine 5: 388–393. https://zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/on_the_age_of_the_suns_heat.html. 
  81. England, P.; Molnar, P.; Righter, F. (January 2007). "John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics". GSA Today 17 (1): 4–9. doi:10.1130/GSAT01701A.1. 
  82. Bohr, N. (July 1913). "I. On the constitution of atoms and molecules". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 26 (151): 1–25. doi:10.1080/14786441308634955. https://zenodo.org/record/2493915. 
  83. Glass, I.S. (2008). Proxima, the Nearest Star (other than the Sun). Cape Town: Mons Mensa. 
  84. Dyson, F.W.; Eddington, A.S.; Davidson, C.R. (1920). "A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun's Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Solar eclipse of May 29, 1919". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 220 (571–581): 291–333. doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009. Bibcode1920RSPTA.220..291D. https://zenodo.org/record/1432106. 
  85. Evans, Ben (April 25, 2020). "The Great Debate - 100 years later" (in en). https://astronomy.com/news/2020/04/the-great-debate-of-shapley-and-curtis--100-years-later. 
  86. Feynman, R., QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, Penguin 1990 Edition, p. 84.
  87. Davisson, C. J.; Germer, L. H. (1928). "Reflection of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 14 (4): 317–322. doi:10.1073/pnas.14.4.317. PMID 16587341. Bibcode1928PNAS...14..317D. 
  88. Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). "The Quantum Theory of the Electron". Proceedings of the Royal Society A 117 (778): 610–624. doi:10.1098/rspa.1928.0023. Bibcode1928RSPSA.117..610D. 
  89. Anderson, C. D. (1933). "The Positive Electron". Physical Review 43 (6): 491–494. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.43.491. Bibcode1933PhRv...43..491A. 
  90. "Three steps to the Hubble constant". https://www.spacetelescope.org/images/opo1812a/. 
  91. Karl Jansky (Oct 1933). "Electrical Disturbances Apparently of Extraterrestrial Origin". Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 21 (10): 1387–1398. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1933.227458. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/681378.  See also Karl Jansky (Jul 8, 1933). "Radio Waves from Outside the Solar System". Nature 132 (3323): 66. doi:10.1038/132066a0. Bibcode1933Natur.132...66J. https://www.nature.com/articles/132066a0.pdf. 
  92. Bethe, H.; Critchfield, C. (1938). "On the Formation of Deuterons by Proton Combination". Physical Review 54 (10): 862. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.54.862.2. Bibcode1938PhRv...54Q.862B. 
  93. Bethe, H. (1939). "Energy Production in Stars". Physical Review 55 (1): 434–456. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.434. PMID 17835673. Bibcode1939PhRv...55..434B. 
  94. "STS-31". NASA. http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-31/mission-sts-31.html. 
  95. Wolszczan, A.; Frail, D. (1992). "A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12". Nature 355 (6356): 145–147. doi:10.1038/355145a0. Bibcode1992Natur.355..145W. 
  96. Mayor, Michael; Queloz, Didier (1995). "A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star". Nature 378 (6555): 355–359. doi:10.1038/378355a0. Bibcode1995Natur.378..355M. 
  97. "Voyager 1 Sees Solar Wind Decline". NASA. December 13, 2010. http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/display.cfm?News_ID=36121. 
  98. Staff (March 17, 2014). "BICEP2 2014 Results Release". National Science Foundation. http://bicepkeck.org. 
  99. Clavin, Whitney (March 17, 2014). "NASA Technology Views Birth of the Universe". NASA. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2014-082. 
  100. Overbye, Dennis (March 17, 2014). "Space Ripples Reveal Big Bang's Smoking Gun". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/science/space/detection-of-waves-in-space-buttresses-landmark-theory-of-big-bang.html. 
  101. Overbye, Dennis (March 24, 2014). "Ripples From the Big Bang". New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/science/space/ripples-from-the-big-bang.html. 
  102. 104.0 104.1 Ade, P.A.R.; BICEP2 Collaboration (June 19, 2014). "Detection of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2". Physical Review Letters 112 (24): 241101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101. PMID 24996078. Bibcode2014PhRvL.112x1101B. 
  103. "BICEP2 News | Not Even Wrong". http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=6865. 
  104. Overbye, Dennis (June 19, 2014). "Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim". New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/science/space/scientists-debate-gravity-wave-detection-claim.html. 
  105. Amos, Jonathan (June 19, 2014). "Cosmic inflation: Confidence lowered for Big Bang signal". BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-27935479. 
  106. Abbott, B. P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T. D.; Abernathy, M. R.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T. et al. (2016-02-11). "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger" (in en). Physical Review Letters 116 (6): 061102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 26918975. Bibcode2016PhRvL.116f1102A. 
  107. Castelvecchi, Davide; Witze, Alexandra (11 February 2016). "Einstein's gravitational waves found at last". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19361. http://www.nature.com/news/einstein-s-gravitational-waves-found-at-last-1.19361. Retrieved 11 February 2016. 
  108. Blum, Alexander; Lalli, Roberto; Renn, Jürgen (12 February 2016). "The long road towards evidence". Max Planck Society. http://www.mpg.de/9966773/background. 
  109. Abbott, B. P. (15 June 2016). "GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence". Physical Review Letters 116 (24): 241103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103. PMID 27367379. Bibcode2016PhRvL.116x1103A. 
  110. Commissariat, Tushna (15 June 2016). "LIGO detects second black-hole merger". Institute of Physics. http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/jun/15/ligo-detects-second-black-hole-merger. 
  111. "First-ever Image of a Black Hole Published by the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration" (in en). https://eventhorizontelescope.org/blog/first-ever-image-black-hole-published-event-horizon-telescope-collaboration. 
  112. "The first picture of a black hole opens a new era of astrophysics" (in en-US). 2019-04-10. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/black-hole-first-picture-event-horizon-telescope. 
  113. "How Does the Event Horizon Telescope Work?" (in en-US). 2019-04-15. https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-blogs/black-hole-files/how-does-very-long-baseline-interferometry-work/. 
  114. University of Geneva (10 March 2020). "Solved: The mystery of the expansion of the universe". Phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2020-03-mystery-expansion-universe.html. 
  115. Lombriser, Lucas (10 April 2020). "Consistency of the local Hubble constant with the cosmic microwave background". Physics Letters B 803: 135303. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135303. Bibcode2020PhLB..80335303L. 
  116. "Rethinking cosmology: Universe expansion may not be uniform (Update)" (in en). https://phys.org/news/2020-04-basic-assumption-universe.html. 
  117. "Nasa study challenges one of our most basic ideas about the universe" (in en). The Independent. 8 April 2020. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/universe-expanding-direction-nasa-esa-cosmology-isotropic-a9455641.html. 
  118. "Parts of the universe may be expanding faster than others". New Atlas. 9 April 2020. https://newatlas.com/physics/universe-expansion-not-uniform/. 
  119. "Doubts about basic assumption for the universe" (in en). EurekAlert!. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-04/uob-dab040820.php. 
  120. Migkas, K.; Schellenberger, G.; Reiprich, T. H.; Pacaud, F.; Ramos-Ceja, M. E.; Lovisari, L. (8 April 2020). "Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the LX–T scaling relation" (in en). Astronomy & Astrophysics 636: A15. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936602. ISSN 0004-6361. Bibcode2020A&A...636A..15M. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2020/04/aa36602-19/aa36602-19.html. Retrieved 15 May 2020. 
  121. "The laws of physics may break down at the edge of the universe" (in en). Futurism. https://futurism.com/the-byte/laws-physics-break-down-edge-universe. 
  122. "New findings suggest laws of nature 'downright weird,' not as constant as previously thought" (in en). phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2020-04-laws-nature-downright-weird-constant.html. 
  123. Field, David (28 April 2020). "New Tests Suggest a Fundamental Constant of Physics Isn't The Same Across The Universe". ScienceAlert.com. https://www.sciencealert.com/new-tests-suggest-the-fundamental-forces-of-nature-aren-t-constant-across-the-universe. 
  124. Wilczynska, Michael R.; Webb, John K.; Bainbridge, Matthew; Barrow, John D.; Bosman, Sarah E. I.; Carswell, Robert F.; Dąbrowski, Mariusz P.; Dumont, Vincent et al. (1 April 2020). "Four direct measurements of the fine-structure constant 13 billion years ago". Science Advances 6 (17): eaay9672. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay9672. PMID 32426462. Bibcode2020SciA....6.9672W. 
  125. "Ariane 5 goes down in history with successful launch of Webb". Arianespace (Press release). 25 December 2021. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 25 December 2021.
  126. Frank, Adam; Gleiser, Marcelo (2 September 2023). "The Story of Our Universe May Be Starting to Unravel". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 September 2023. https://archive.today/20230902161629/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/02/opinion/cosmology-crisis-webb-telescope.html. Retrieved 3 September 2023. 

Bibliography

  • Bunch, Bryan, and Alexander Hellemans, The History of Science and Technology: A Browser's Guide to the Great Discoveries, Inventions, and the People Who Made Them from the Dawn of Time to Today. ISBN:0-618-22123-9
  • P. de Bernardis et al., astro-ph/0004404, Nature 404 (2000) 955–959.
  • Horowitz, Wayne (1998). Mesopotamian cosmic geography. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-0-931464-99-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=P8fl8BXpR0MC. 
  • P. Mauskopf et al., astro-ph/9911444, Astrophys. J. 536 (2000) L59–L62.
  • A. Melchiorri et al., astro-ph/9911445, Astrophys. J. 536 (2000) L63–L66.
  • A. Readhead et al., Polarization observations with the Cosmic Background Imager, Science 306 (2004), 836–844.