From HandWiki
Short description: Superconducting qubit implementation

In quantum computing, and more specifically in superconducting quantum computing, a transmon is a type of superconducting charge qubit that was designed to have reduced sensitivity to charge noise. The transmon was developed by Robert J. Schoelkopf, Michel Devoret, Steven M. Girvin, and their colleagues at Yale University in 2007.[1][2] Its name is an abbreviation of the term transmission line shunted plasma oscillation qubit; one which consists of a Cooper-pair box "where the two superconductors are also capacitatively shunted in order to decrease the sensitivity to charge noise, while maintaining a sufficient anharmonicity for selective qubit control".[3]

A device consisting of four transmon qubits, four quantum buses, and four readout resonators fabricated by IBM and published in npj Quantum Information in January 2017.[4]

The transmon achieves its reduced sensitivity to charge noise by significantly increasing the ratio of the Josephson energy to the charging energy. This is accomplished through the use of a large shunting capacitor. The result is energy level spacings that are approximately independent of offset charge. Planar on-chip transmon qubits have T1 coherence times approximately 30 μs to 40 μs.[5] Recent work has shown significantly improved T1 times as long as 95 μs by replacing the superconducting transmission line cavity with a three-dimensional superconducting cavity,[6][7] and by replacing niobium with tantalum in the transmon device, T1 is further improved up to 0.3 ms.[8] These results demonstrate that previous T1 times were not limited by Josephson junction losses. Understanding the fundamental limits on the coherence time in superconducting qubits such as the transmon is an active area of research.

Comparison to Cooper-pair box

Schematical qubit energy levels diagram evolution from charge qubit (top, [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\rm J}/E_{\rm C}=1 }[/math]) to transmon (bottom, [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\rm J}/E_{\rm C}=50 }[/math]), plotted for the first 3 energy levels ([math]\displaystyle{ m=0,1,2 }[/math]), as function of the average number [math]\displaystyle{ n_g }[/math] of Cooper pairs across the junction, normalized to the gap between the ground and the first excited state.[1] The charge qubit (top) is normally operated at the [math]\displaystyle{ n_g=0.5 }[/math] "sweet spot", where fluctuations in [math]\displaystyle{ n_g }[/math] cause less energy shift, and the anharmonicity is maximal. Transmon (bottom) energy levels are insensitive to [math]\displaystyle{ n_g }[/math] fluctuations, but the anharmonicity is reduced.

The transmon design is similar to the first design of the charge qubit[9] known as a "Cooper-pair box"; both are described by the same Hamiltonian, with the only difference being the [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\rm J}/E_{\rm C} }[/math] ratio. Here [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\rm J} }[/math] is the Josephson energy of the junction, and [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\rm C} }[/math] is the charging energy inversely proportional to the total capacitance of the qubit circuit. Transmons typically have [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\mathrm J}/E_{\mathrm C} \gg 1 }[/math] (while [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\mathrm J}/E_{\mathrm C} \lesssim 1 }[/math] for typical Cooper-pair-box qubits), which is achieved by shunting the Josephson junction with an additional large capacitor.

The benefit of increasing the [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\rm J}/E_{\rm C} }[/math] ratio is the insensitivity to charge noise—the energy levels become independent of the offset charge [math]\displaystyle{ n_g }[/math] across the junction; thus the dephasing time of the qubit is prolonged. The disadvantage is the reduced anharmonicity [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha = (E_{21}-E_{10})/E_{10} }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ E_{ij} }[/math] is the energy difference between eigenstates [math]\displaystyle{ |i\rangle }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ | j \rangle }[/math]. Reduced anharmonicity complicates the device operation as a two level system, e.g. exciting the device from the ground state to the first excited state by a resonant pulse also populates the higher excited state. This complication is overcome by complex microwave pulse design, that takes into account the higher energy levels, and prohibits their excitation by destructive interference. Also, while the variation of [math]\displaystyle{ E_{10} }[/math]with respect to [math]\displaystyle{ n_g }[/math] tend to decrease exponentially with [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\mathrm J}/ E_{\mathrm C} }[/math], the anharmonicity only has a weaker, algebraic dependence on [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\mathrm J}/E_{\mathrm C} }[/math] as [math]\displaystyle{ \sim (E_{\mathrm J}/E_{\mathrm C})^{-1/2} }[/math]. The significant gain in the coherence time outweigh the decrease in the anharmonicity for controlling the states with high fidelity.

Measurement, control and coupling of transmons is performed by means of microwave resonators with techniques from circuit quantum electrodynamics also applicable to other superconducting qubits. Coupling to the resonators is done by placing a capacitor between the qubit and the resonator, at a point where the resonator electromagnetic field is greatest. For example, in IBM Quantum Experience devices, the resonators are implemented with "quarter wave" coplanar waveguides with maximal field at the signal-ground short at the waveguide end; thus every IBM transmon qubit has a long resonator "tail". The initial proposal included similar transmission line resonators coupled to every transmon, becoming a part of the name. However, charge qubits operated at a similar [math]\displaystyle{ E_{\rm J}/E_{\rm C} }[/math] regime, coupled to different kinds of microwave cavities are referred to as transmons as well.

See also


  1. 1.0 1.1 Koch, Jens; Yu, Terri M.; Gambetta, Jay; Houck, A. A.; Schuster, D. I.; Majer, J.; Blais, Alexandre; Devoret, M. H. et al. (2007-10-12). "Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box". Physical Review A 76 (4): 042319. doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319. ISSN 1050-2947. Bibcode2007PhRvA..76d2319K. 
  2. Schreier, J. A.; Houck, A. A.; Koch, Jens; Schuster, D. I.; Johnson, B. R. et al. (2008-05-12). "Suppressing charge noise decoherence in superconducting charge qubits". Physical Review B (American Physical Society (APS)) 77 (18): 180402. doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.180502. ISSN 1098-0121. Bibcode2008PhRvB..77r0502S. 
  3. Fink, Johannes M. (2010). Quantum Nonlinearities in Strong Coupling Circuit QED (Ph.D.). ETH Zurich.
  4. Gambetta, Jay M.; Chow, Jerry M.; Steffen, Matthias (2017-01-13). "Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system". npj Quantum Information (Springer Science and Business Media LLC) 3 (1): 2. doi:10.1038/s41534-016-0004-0. ISSN 2056-6387. Bibcode2017npjQI...3....2G. 
  5. Barends, R.; Kelly, J.; Megrant, A.; Sank, D.; Jeffrey, E. et al. (2013-08-22). "Coherent Josephson Qubit Suitable for Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits". Physical Review Letters 111 (8): 080502. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.080502. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 24010421. Bibcode2013PhRvL.111h0502B. 
  6. Paik, Hanhee; Schuster, D. I.; Bishop, Lev S.; Kirchmair, G.; Catelani, G. et al. (2011-12-05). "Observation of High Coherence in Josephson Junction Qubits Measured in a Three-Dimensional Circuit QED Architecture". Physical Review Letters 107 (24): 240501. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.240501. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 22242979. Bibcode2011PhRvL.107x0501P. 
  7. Rigetti, Chad; Gambetta, Jay M.; Poletto, Stefano; Plourde, B. L. T.; Chow, Jerry M. et al. (2012-09-24). "Superconducting qubit in a waveguide cavity with a coherence time approaching 0.1 ms". Physical Review B (American Physical Society (APS)) 86 (10): 100506. doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.100506. ISSN 1098-0121. Bibcode2012PhRvB..86j0506R. 
  8. Place, Alexander P. M.; Rodgers, Lila V. H.; Mundada, Pranav; Smitham, Basil M.; Fitzpatrick, Mattias; Leng, Zhaoqi; Premkumar, Anjali; Bryon, Jacob et al. (2021-03-19). "New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds" (in en). Nature Communications 12 (1): 1779. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22030-5. ISSN 2041-1723. 
  9. Bouchiat, V.; Vion, D.; Joyez, P.; Esteve, D.; Devoret, M. H. (1998). "Quantum coherence with a single Cooper pair" (in en). Physica Scripta 1998 (T76): 165. doi:10.1238/Physica.Topical.076a00165. ISSN 1402-4896. Bibcode1998PhST...76..165B.