Descartes number

From HandWiki
Short description: Number which would have been an odd perfect number if one of its composite factors were prime

In number theory, a Descartes number is an odd number which would have been an odd perfect number if one of its composite factors were prime. They are named after René Descartes who observed that the number D = 32⋅72⋅112⋅132⋅22021 = (3⋅1001)2 ⋅ (22⋅1001 − 1) = 198585576189 would be an odd perfect number if only 22021 were a prime number, since the sum-of-divisors function for D would satisfy, if 22021 were prime,

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \sigma(D) &= (3^2+3+1)\cdot(7^2+7+1)\cdot(11^2+11+1)\cdot(13^2+13+1)\cdot(22021+1) = (13)\cdot(3\cdot19)\cdot(7\cdot19)\cdot(3\cdot61)\cdot(22\cdot1001) \\ &= 3^2\cdot7\cdot13\cdot19^2\cdot61\cdot(22\cdot7\cdot11\cdot13) = 2 \cdot (3^2\cdot7^2\cdot11^2\cdot13^2) \cdot (19^2\cdot61) = 2 \cdot (3^2\cdot7^2\cdot11^2\cdot13^2) \cdot 22021 = 2D, \end{align} }[/math]

where we ignore the fact that 22021 is composite (22021 = 192 ⋅ 61).

A Descartes number is defined as an odd number n = m ⋅ p where m and p are coprime and 2n = σ(m) ⋅ (p + 1), whence p is taken as a 'spoof' prime. The example given is the only one currently known.

If m is an odd almost perfect number,[1] that is, σ(m) = 2m − 1 and 2m − 1 is taken as a 'spoof' prime, then n = m ⋅ (2m − 1) is a Descartes number, since σ(n) = σ(m ⋅ (2m − 1)) = σ(m) ⋅ 2m = (2m − 1) ⋅ 2m = 2n. If 2m − 1 were prime, n would be an odd perfect number.

Properties

Banks et al. showed in 2008 that if n is a cube-free Descartes number not divisible by [math]\displaystyle{ 3 }[/math], then n has over a million distinct prime divisors.

Tóth showed in 2021 that if [math]\displaystyle{ D=pq }[/math] denotes a Descartes number (other than Descartes’ example), with pseudo-prime factor [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ q \gt 10^{12} }[/math].

Generalizations

John Voight generalized Descartes numbers to allow negative bases. He found the example [math]\displaystyle{ 3^4 7^2 11^2 19^2 (-127)^1 }[/math].[2] Subsequent work by a group at Brigham Young University found more examples similar to Voight's example, [2] and also allowed a new class of spoofs where one is allowed to also not notice that a prime is the same as another prime in the factorization.[3]

See also

Notes

  1. Currently, the only known almost perfect numbers are the non-negative powers of 2, whence the only known odd almost perfect number is 20 = 1.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Nadis, Steve (September 10, 2020). "Mathematicians Open a New Front on an Ancient Number Problem". Quanta Magazine. https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-open-a-new-front-on-an-ancient-number-problem-20200910/. 
  3. Andersen, Nickolas; Durham, Spencer ; Griffin, Michael J. ; Hales, Jonathan ; Jenkins, Paul ; Keck, Ryan ; Ko, Hankun ; Molnar, Grant; Moss, Eric ; Nielsen, Pace P. ; Niendorf, Kyle ; Tombs, Vandy; Warnick, Merrill ; Wu, Dongsheng (2020). "Odd, spoof perfect factorizations". J. Number Theory (234): 31-47.  arXiv version

References