Strictly non-palindromic number
A strictly non-palindromic number is an integer n that is not palindromic in any positional numeral system with a base b in the range 2 ≤ b ≤ n − 2. For example, the number 6 is written as "110" in base 2, "20" in base 3 and "12" in base 4, none of which are palindromes—so 6 is strictly non-palindromic.
Definition
A representation of a number n in base b, where b > 1 and n > 0, is a sequence of k+1 digits ai (0 ≤ i ≤ k) such that
- [math]\displaystyle{ n=\sum_{i=0}^ka_ib^i }[/math]
and 0 ≤ ai < b for all i and ak ≠ 0.
Such a representation is defined as palindromic if ai = ak−i for all i.
A number n is defined as strictly non-palindromic if the representation of n is non-palindromic in every base b where 2 ≤ b ≤ n-2.
The sequence of strictly non-palindromic numbers (sequence A016038 in the OEIS) starts:
- 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 11, 19, 47, 53, 79, 103, 137, 139, 149, 163, 167, 179, 223, 263, 269, 283, 293, 311, 317, 347, 359, 367, 389, 439, 491, 563, 569, 593, 607, 659, 739, 827, 853, 877, 977, 983, 997, ...
For example, the number 19 written in base 2 through 17 is:
b 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 in base b 10011 201 103 34 31 25 23 21 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12
None of these is a palindrome, so 19 is a strictly non-palindromic number.
The reason for the upper limit of n − 2 on the base is that all numbers are trivially palindromic in large bases:
- In base b = n − 1, n ≥ 3 is written "11".
- In any base b > n, n is a single digit, so is palindromic in all such bases.
Thus it can be seen that the upper limit of n − 2 is necessary to obtain a mathematically "interesting" definition.
For n < 4 the range of bases is empty, so these numbers are strictly non-palindromic in a trivial way.
Properties
This section does not cite any external source. HandWiki requires at least one external source. See citing external sources. (April 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
All strictly non-palindromic numbers larger than 6 are prime. One can prove that a composite n > 6 cannot be strictly non-palindromic as follows. For each such n a base is shown to exist in which n is palindromic.
- If n is even and greater than 6, then n is written "22" (a palindrome) in base n/2 − 1. (Note that if n less than or equal to 6, the base n/2 − 1 would be less than 3, so the digit "2" could not occur in the representation of n.)
- If n is odd and greater than 1, write n = p · m, where p is the smallest prime factor of n. Clearly p ≤ m (since n is composite).
- If p = m (that is, n = p2), there are two cases:
- If p = 3, then n = 9 is written "1001" (a palindrome) in base 2.
- If p > 3, then n is written "121" (a palindrome) in base p − 1.
- p cannot equal m - 1 because both p and m are odd, so p < m − 1. Then n can be written as the two-digit number pp in base m − 1.
- If p = m (that is, n = p2), there are two cases:
References
- Sequence A016038 from the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences