From HandWiki
Short description: Planet outside the Solar System
Size-exaggerated artist's conception showing the ratio of planets to stars in the Milky Way
Artist's impression (not to scale) of how commonly planets orbit the stars in the Milky Way.[1]
Histogram of Discovered Exoplanets each year with discovery methods as of 5 March 2020
Discovered exoplanets each year with discovery methods, up to the present, with color indicating discovery method.[2]
  Direct imaging
Size comparison of Jupiter and the exoplanet TrES-3b
Size comparison of Jupiter and the exoplanet TrES-3b. TrES-3b has an orbital period of only 31 hours[3] and is classified as a hot Jupiter for being large and close to its star, making it one of the easiest planets to detect by the transit method.
Histogram Chart of Confirmed Exoplanets by distance
NASA histogram chart of confirmed exoplanets by distance

An exoplanet or extrasolar planet is a planet outside the Solar System. The first possible evidence of an exoplanet was noted in 1917 but was not recognized as such.[4] The first confirmation of detection occurred in 1992. A different planet, initially detected in 1988, was confirmed in 2003. As of 1 January 2020, there are 4,160 confirmed exoplanets in 3,090 systems, with 676 systems having more than one planet.[5]

There are many methods of detecting exoplanets. Transit photometry and Doppler spectroscopy have found the most, but these methods suffer from a clear observational bias favoring the detection of planets near the star; thus, 85% of the exoplanets detected are inside the tidal locking zone.[6] In several cases, multiple planets have been observed around a star.[7] About 1 in 5 Sun-like stars[lower-alpha 1] have an "Earth-sized"[lower-alpha 2] planet in the habitable zone.[lower-alpha 3][8][9] Assuming there are 200 billion stars in the Milky Way,[lower-alpha 4] it can be hypothesized that there are 11 billion potentially habitable Earth-sized planets in the Milky Way, rising to 40 billion if planets orbiting the numerous red dwarfs are included.[10]

The least massive planet known is Draugr (also known as PSR B1257+12 A or PSR B1257+12 b), which is about twice the mass of the Moon. The most massive planet listed on the NASA Exoplanet Archive is HR 2562 b,[11][12] about 30 times the mass of Jupiter. However, according to some definitions of a planet (based on the nuclear fusion of deuterium[13]), it is too massive to be a planet and might be a brown dwarf instead. Known orbital times for exoplanets vary from a few hours (for those closest to their star) to thousands of years. Some exoplanets are so far away from the star that it is difficult to tell whether they are gravitationally bound to it. Almost all of the planets detected so far are within the Milky Way. However, there is evidence that extragalactic planets, exoplanets farther away in galaxies beyond the local Milky Way galaxy, may exist.[14][15] The nearest exoplanets are located 4.2 light-years (1.3 parsecs) from Earth and orbit Proxima Centauri, the closest star to the Sun.[16]

The discovery of exoplanets has intensified interest in the search for extraterrestrial life. There is special interest in planets that orbit in a star's habitable zone, where it is possible for liquid water, a prerequisite for life on Earth, to exist on the surface. However, the study of planetary habitability also considers a wide range of other factors in determining the suitability of a planet for hosting life.[17]

Rogue planets are those that do not orbit any star. Such objects are considered a separate category of planets, especially if they are gas giants, often counted as sub-brown dwarfs.[18] The rogue planets in the Milky Way possibly number in the billions or more.[19][20]



The official definition of the term planet used by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) only covers the Solar System and thus does not apply to exoplanets.[21][22] The IAU Working Group on Extrasolar Planets issued a position statement containing a working definition of "planet" in 2001 and which was modified in 2003.[23] An exoplanet was defined by the following criteria:

  • Objects with true masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium (currently calculated to be 13 Jupiter masses for objects of solar metallicity) that orbit stars or stellar remnants are "planets" (no matter how they formed). The minimum mass/size required for an extrasolar object to be considered a planet should be the same as that used in the Solar System.
  • Substellar objects with true masses above the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are "brown dwarfs", no matter how they formed or where they are located.
  • Free-floating objects in young star clusters with masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are not "planets", but are "sub-brown dwarfs" (or whatever name is most appropriate).

This working definition was amended by the IAU's Commission F2: Exoplanets and the Solar System in August 2018.[24] The official working definition of an exoplanet is now as follows:

  • Objects with true masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium (currently calculated to be 13 Jupiter masses for objects of solar metallicity) that orbit stars, brown dwarfs or stellar remnants and that have a mass ratio with the central object below the L4/L5 instability (M/Mcentral < 2/(25+621) are "planets" (no matter how they formed).
  • The minimum mass/size required for an extrasolar object to be considered a planet should be the same as that used in our Solar System.

The IAU noted that this definition could be expected to evolve as knowledge improves.


The IAU's working definition is not always used. One alternate suggestion is that planets should be distinguished from brown dwarfs on the basis of formation. It is widely thought that giant planets form through core accretion, which may sometimes produce planets with masses above the deuterium fusion threshold;[25][26][13] massive planets of that sort may have already been observed.[27] Brown dwarfs form like stars from the direct gravitational collapse of clouds of gas and this formation mechanism also produces objects that are below the 13 ||J}}}}}} limit and can be as low as 1 MJup.[28] Objects in this mass range that orbit their stars with wide separations of hundreds or thousands of AU and have large star/object mass ratios likely formed as brown dwarfs; their atmospheres would likely have a composition more similar to their host star than accretion-formed planets which would contain increased abundances of heavier elements. Most directly imaged planets as of April 2014 are massive and have wide orbits so probably represent the low-mass end of brown dwarf formation.[29] One study suggests that objects above 10 MJup formed through gravitational instability and should not be thought of as planets.[30]

Also, the 13-Jupiter-mass cutoff does not have precise physical significance. Deuterium fusion can occur in some objects with a mass below that cutoff.[13] The amount of deuterium fused depends to some extent on the composition of the object.[31] As of 2011 the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia included objects up to 25 Jupiter masses, saying, "The fact that there is no special feature around 13 MJup in the observed mass spectrum reinforces the choice to forget this mass limit".[32] As of 2016 this limit was increased to 60 Jupiter masses[33] based on a study of mass–density relationships.[34] The Exoplanet Data Explorer includes objects up to 24 Jupiter masses with the advisory: "The 13 Jupiter-mass distinction by the IAU Working Group is physically unmotivated for planets with rocky cores, and observationally problematic due to the sin i ambiguity."[35] The NASA Exoplanet Archive includes objects with a mass (or minimum mass) equal to or less than 30 Jupiter masses.[36] Another criterion for separating planets and brown dwarfs, rather than deuterium fusion, formation process or location, is whether the core pressure is dominated by coulomb pressure or electron degeneracy pressure with the dividing line at around 5 Jupiter masses.[37][38]


Exoplanet HIP 65426b is the first discovered planet around star HIP 65426.[39]

<section begin=nomenclature />

Main page: Exoplanet naming convention

The convention for designating exoplanets is an extension of the system used for designating multiple-star systems as adopted by the International Astronomical Union (IAU). For exoplanets orbiting a single star, the IAU designation is formed by taking the designated or proper name of its parent star, and adding a lower case letter.[40] Letters are given in order of each planet's discovery around the parent star, so that the first planet discovered in a system is designated "b" (the parent star is considered to be "a") and later planets are given subsequent letters. If several planets in the same system are discovered at the same time, the closest one to the star gets the next letter, followed by the other planets in order of orbital size. A provisional IAU-sanctioned standard exists to accommodate the designation of circumbinary planets. A limited number of exoplanets have IAU-sanctioned proper names. Other naming systems exist.<section end=nomenclature />

History of detection

For centuries scientists, philosophers, and science fiction writers suspected that extrasolar planets existed, but there was no way of knowing whether they existed, how common they were, or how similar they might be to the planets of the Solar System. Various detection claims made in the nineteenth century were rejected by astronomers.

The first evidence of a possible exoplanet, orbiting Van Maanen 2, was noted in 1917, but was not recognized as such. The astronomer Walter Sydney Adams, who later became director of the Mount Wilson Observatory, produced a spectrum of the star using Mount Wilson's 60-inch telescope. He interpreted the spectrum to be of an F-type main-sequence star, but it is now thought that such a spectrum could be caused by the residue of a nearby exoplanet that had been pulverized into dust by the gravity of the star, the resulting dust then falling onto the star.[4]

The first suspected scientific detection of an exoplanet occurred in 1988. Shortly afterwards, the first confirmation of detection came in 1992, with the discovery of several terrestrial-mass planets orbiting the pulsar PSR B1257+12.[41] The first confirmation of an exoplanet orbiting a main-sequence star was made in 1995, when a giant planet was found in a four-day orbit around the nearby star 51 Pegasi. Some exoplanets have been imaged directly by telescopes, but the vast majority have been detected through indirect methods, such as the transit method and the radial-velocity method. In February 2018, researchers using the Chandra X-ray Observatory, combined with a planet detection technique called microlensing, found evidence of planets in a distant galaxy, stating "Some of these exoplanets are as (relatively) small as the moon, while others are as massive as Jupiter. Unlike Earth, most of the exoplanets are not tightly bound to stars, so they're actually wandering through space or loosely orbiting between stars. We can estimate that the number of planets in this [faraway] galaxy is more than a trillion.[42] On 21st March 2022, the 5000th exoplanet beyond our solar system was confirmed.[43]

Early speculations

In the sixteenth century, the Italian philosopher Giordano Bruno, an early supporter of the Copernican theory that Earth and other planets orbit the Sun (heliocentrism), put forward the view that the fixed stars are similar to the Sun and are likewise accompanied by planets.

In the eighteenth century, the same possibility was mentioned by Isaac Newton in the "General Scholium" that concludes his Principia. Making a comparison to the Sun's planets, he wrote "And if the fixed stars are the centres of similar systems, they will all be constructed according to a similar design and subject to the dominion of One."[45]

In 1952, more than 40 years before the first hot Jupiter was discovered, Otto Struve wrote that there is no compelling reason why planets could not be much closer to their parent star than is the case in the Solar System, and proposed that Doppler spectroscopy and the transit method could detect super-Jupiters in short orbits.[46]

Discredited claims

Claims of exoplanet detections have been made since the nineteenth century. Some of the earliest involve the binary star 70 Ophiuchi. In 1855 William Stephen Jacob at the East India Company's Madras Observatory reported that orbital anomalies made it "highly probable" that there was a "planetary body" in this system.[47] In the 1890s, Thomas J. J. See of the University of Chicago and the United States Naval Observatory stated that the orbital anomalies proved the existence of a dark body in the 70 Ophiuchi system with a 36-year period around one of the stars.[48] However, Forest Ray Moulton published a paper proving that a three-body system with those orbital parameters would be highly unstable.[49] During the 1950s and 1960s, Peter van de Kamp of Swarthmore College made another prominent series of detection claims, this time for planets orbiting Barnard's Star.[50] Astronomers now generally regard all the early reports of detection as erroneous.[51]

In 1991 Andrew Lyne, M. Bailes and S. L. Shemar claimed to have discovered a pulsar planet in orbit around PSR 1829-10, using pulsar timing variations.[52] The claim briefly received intense attention, but Lyne and his team soon retracted it.[53]

Confirmed discoveries

Main page: Astronomy:Discoveries of exoplanets
False-color, star-subtracted, direct image using a vortex coronagraph of 3 exoplanets around star HR8799
The three known planets of the star HR8799, as imaged by the Hale Telescope. The light from the central star was blanked out by a vector vortex coronagraph.
Hubble image of brown dwarf 2MASS J044144 and its 5–10 Jupiter-mass companion, before and after star-subtraction
2MASS J044144 is a brown dwarf with a companion about 5–10 times the mass of Jupiter. It is not clear whether this companion object is a sub-brown dwarf or a planet.

As of 1 January 2020, a total of 4,160 confirmed exoplanets are listed in the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia, including a few that were confirmations of controversial claims from the late 1980s.[5] The first published discovery to receive subsequent confirmation was made in 1988 by the Canadian astronomers Bruce Campbell, G. A. H. Walker, and Stephenson Yang of the University of Victoria and the University of British Columbia.[54] Although they were cautious about claiming a planetary detection, their radial-velocity observations suggested that a planet orbits the star Gamma Cephei. Partly because the observations were at the very limits of instrumental capabilities at the time, astronomers remained skeptical for several years about this and other similar observations. It was thought some of the apparent planets might instead have been brown dwarfs, objects intermediate in mass between planets and stars. In 1990, additional observations were published that supported the existence of the planet orbiting Gamma Cephei,[55] but subsequent work in 1992 again raised serious doubts.[56] Finally, in 2003, improved techniques allowed the planet's existence to be confirmed.[57]

Coronagraphic image of AB Pictoris showing a companion (bottom left), which is either a brown dwarf or a massive planet. The data was obtained on 16 March 2003 with NACO on the VLT, using a 1.4 arcsec occulting mask on top of AB Pictoris.

On 9 January 1992, radio astronomers Aleksander Wolszczan and Dale Frail announced the discovery of two planets orbiting the pulsar PSR 1257+12.[41] This discovery was confirmed, and is generally considered to be the first definitive detection of exoplanets. Follow-up observations solidified these results, and confirmation of a third planet in 1994 revived the topic in the popular press.[58] These pulsar planets are thought to have formed from the unusual remnants of the supernova that produced the pulsar, in a second round of planet formation, or else to be the remaining rocky cores of gas giants that somehow survived the supernova and then decayed into their current orbits.

In the early 1990s, a group of astronomers led by Donald Backer, who were studying what they thought was a binary pulsar (PSR B1620−26 b), determined that a third object was needed to explain the observed Doppler shifts. Within a few years, the gravitational effects of the planet on the orbit of the pulsar and white dwarf had been measured, giving an estimate of the mass of the third object that was too small for it to be a star. The conclusion that the third object was a planet was announced by Stephen Thorsett and his collaborators in 1993.[59]

On 6 October 1995, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz of the University of Geneva announced the first definitive detection of an exoplanet orbiting a main-sequence star, nearby G-type star 51 Pegasi.[60][61] This discovery, made at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence, ushered in the modern era of exoplanetary discovery, and was recognized by a share of the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physics. Technological advances, most notably in high-resolution spectroscopy, led to the rapid detection of many new exoplanets: astronomers could detect exoplanets indirectly by measuring their gravitational influence on the motion of their host stars. More extrasolar planets were later detected by observing the variation in a star's apparent luminosity as an orbiting planet transited in front of it.

Initially, most known exoplanets were massive planets that orbited very close to their parent stars. Astronomers were surprised by these "hot Jupiters", because theories of planetary formation had indicated that giant planets should only form at large distances from stars. But eventually more planets of other sorts were found, and it is now clear that hot Jupiters make up the minority of exoplanets. In 1999, Upsilon Andromedae became the first main-sequence star known to have multiple planets.[62] Kepler-16 contains the first discovered planet that orbits around a binary main-sequence star system.[63]

On 26 February 2014, NASA announced the discovery of 715 newly verified exoplanets around 305 stars by the Kepler Space Telescope. These exoplanets were checked using a statistical technique called "verification by multiplicity".[64][65][66] Before these results, most confirmed planets were gas giants comparable in size to Jupiter or larger because they are more easily detected, but the Kepler planets are mostly between the size of Neptune and the size of Earth.[64]

On 23 July 2015, NASA announced Kepler-452b, a near-Earth-size planet orbiting the habitable zone of a G2-type star.[67]

On 6 September 2018, NASA discovered an exoplanet about 145 light years away from Earth in the constellation Virgo.[68] This exoplanet, Wolf 503b, is twice the size of Earth and was discovered orbiting a type of star known as an "Orange Dwarf". Wolf 503b completes one orbit in as few as six days because it is very close to the star. Wolf 503b is the only exoplanet that large that can be found near the so-called Fulton gap. The Fulton gap, first noticed in 2017, is the observation that it is unusual to find planets within a certain mass range.[68] Under the Fulton gap studies, this opens up a new field for astronomers, who are still studying whether planets found in the Fulton gap are gaseous or rocky.[68]

In January 2020, scientists announced the discovery of TOI 700 d, the first Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone detected by TESS.[69]

Candidate discoveries

As of January 2020, NASA's Kepler and TESS missions had identified 4374 planetary candidates yet to be confirmed,[70] several of them being nearly Earth-sized and located in the habitable zone, some around Sun-like stars.[71][72][73]

Exoplanet populations – June 2017[74][75]
Exoplanet populations
Small planets come in two sizes
Kepler habitable zone planets

In September 2020, astronomers reported evidence, for the first time, of an extragalactic planet, M51-ULS-1b, detected by eclipsing a bright X-ray source (XRS), in the Whirlpool Galaxy (M51a).[76][77]

Also in September 2020, astronomers using microlensing techniques reported the detection, for the first time, of an earth-mass rogue planet unbounded by any star, and free floating in the Milky Way galaxy.[78][79]


Measuring the flow of gas within a protoplanetary disc allows the detection of exoplanets.[80]

<section begin=detection />

Main page: Methods of detecting exoplanets

About 97% of all the confirmed exoplanets have been discovered by indirect techniques of detection, mainly by radial velocity measurements and transit monitoring techniques.[81]<section end="detection" /> Recently the techniques of singular optics have been applied in the search for exoplanets.[82]

Formation and evolution

Planets may form within a few to tens (or more) of millions of years of their star forming.[83][84][85][86][87] The planets of the Solar System can only be observed in their current state, but observations of different planetary systems of varying ages allows us to observe planets at different stages of evolution. Available observations range from young proto-planetary disks where planets are still forming[88] to planetary systems of over 10 Gyr old.[89] When planets form in a gaseous protoplanetary disk,[90] they accrete hydrogen/helium envelopes.[91][92] These envelopes cool and contract over time and, depending on the mass of the planet, some or all of the hydrogen/helium is eventually lost to space.[90] This means that even terrestrial planets may start off with large radii if they form early enough.[93][94][95] An example is Kepler-51b which has only about twice the mass of Earth but is almost the size of Saturn which is a hundred times the mass of Earth. Kepler-51b is quite young at a few hundred million years old.[96]

Planet-hosting stars

Main page: Astronomy:Planet-hosting stars
The Morgan-Keenan spectral classification system, showing size-and-color comparisons of M, K, G, F, A, B, and O stars
The Morgan-Keenan spectral classification
Artist's impression of exoplanet orbiting two stars.[97]

There is at least one planet on average per star.[7] About 1 in 5 Sun-like stars[lower-alpha 1] have an "Earth-sized"[lower-alpha 2] planet in the habitable zone.[98]

Most known exoplanets orbit stars roughly similar to the Sun, i.e. main-sequence stars of spectral categories F, G, or K. Lower-mass stars (red dwarfs, of spectral category M) are less likely to have planets massive enough to be detected by the radial-velocity method.[99][100] Despite this, several tens of planets around red dwarfs have been discovered by the Kepler spacecraft, which uses the transit method to detect smaller planets.

Using data from Kepler, a correlation has been found between the metallicity of a star and the probability that the star hosts a giant planet, similar to the size of Jupiter. Stars with higher metallicity are more likely to have planets, especially giant planets, than stars with lower metallicity.[101]

Some planets orbit one member of a binary star system,[102] and several circumbinary planets have been discovered which orbit around both members of binary star. A few planets in triple star systems are known[103] and one in the quadruple system Kepler-64.

General features

Color and brightness

Color-color diagram comparing the colors of Solar System planets to exoplanet HD 189733b. HD 189733b reflects as much green as Mars and almost as much blue as Earth.
This color–color diagram compares the colors of planets in the Solar System to exoplanet HD 189733b. The exoplanet's deep blue color is produced by silicate droplets, which scatter blue light in its atmosphere.

In 2013 the color of an exoplanet was determined for the first time. The best-fit albedo measurements of HD 189733b suggest that it is deep dark blue.[104][105] Later that same year, the colors of several other exoplanets were determined, including GJ 504 b which visually has a magenta color,[106] and Kappa Andromedae b, which if seen up close would appear reddish in color.[107] Helium planets are expected to be white or grey in appearance.[108]

The apparent brightness (apparent magnitude) of a planet depends on how far away the observer is, how reflective the planet is (albedo), and how much light the planet receives from its star, which depends on how far the planet is from the star and how bright the star is. So, a planet with a low albedo that is close to its star can appear brighter than a planet with high albedo that is far from the star.[109]

The darkest known planet in terms of geometric albedo is TrES-2b, a hot Jupiter that reflects less than 1% of the light from its star, making it less reflective than coal or black acrylic paint. Hot Jupiters are expected to be quite dark due to sodium and potassium in their atmospheres but it is not known why TrES-2b is so dark—it could be due to an unknown chemical compound.[110][111][112]

For gas giants, geometric albedo generally decreases with increasing metallicity or atmospheric temperature unless there are clouds to modify this effect. Increased cloud-column depth increases the albedo at optical wavelengths, but decreases it at some infrared wavelengths. Optical albedo increases with age, because older planets have higher cloud-column depths. Optical albedo decreases with increasing mass, because higher-mass giant planets have higher surface gravities, which produces lower cloud-column depths. Also, elliptical orbits can cause major fluctuations in atmospheric composition, which can have a significant effect.[113]

There is more thermal emission than reflection at some near-infrared wavelengths for massive and/or young gas giants. So, although optical brightness is fully phase-dependent, this is not always the case in the near infrared.[113]

Temperatures of gas giants reduce over time and with distance from their star. Lowering the temperature increases optical albedo even without clouds. At a sufficiently low temperature, water clouds form, which further increase optical albedo. At even lower temperatures ammonia clouds form, resulting in the highest albedos at most optical and near-infrared wavelengths.[113]

Magnetic field

In 2014, a magnetic field around HD 209458 b was inferred from the way hydrogen was evaporating from the planet. It is the first (indirect) detection of a magnetic field on an exoplanet. The magnetic field is estimated to be about one tenth as strong as Jupiter's.[114][115]

Exoplanets magnetic fields may be detectable by their auroral radio emissions with sensitive enough radio telescopes such as LOFAR.[116][117] The radio emissions could enable determination of the rotation rate of the interior of an exoplanet, and may yield a more accurate way to measure exoplanet rotation than by examining the motion of clouds.[118]

Earth's magnetic field results from its flowing liquid metallic core, but in massive super-Earths with high pressure, different compounds may form which do not match those created under terrestrial conditions. Compounds may form with greater viscosities and high melting temperatures which could prevent the interiors from separating into different layers and so result in undifferentiated coreless mantles. Forms of magnesium oxide such as MgSi3O12 could be a liquid metal at the pressures and temperatures found in super-Earths and could generate a magnetic field in the mantles of super-Earths.[119][120]

Hot Jupiters have been observed to have a larger radius than expected. This could be caused by the interaction between the stellar wind and the planet's magnetosphere creating an electric current through the planet that heats it up causing it to expand. The more magnetically active a star is the greater the stellar wind and the larger the electric current leading to more heating and expansion of the planet. This theory matches the observation that stellar activity is correlated with inflated planetary radii.[121]

In August 2018, scientists announced the transformation of gaseous deuterium into a liquid metallic form. This may help researchers better understand giant gas planets, such as Jupiter, Saturn and related exoplanets, since such planets are thought to contain a lot of liquid metallic hydrogen, which may be responsible for their observed powerful magnetic fields.[122][123]

Although scientists previously announced that the magnetic fields of close-in exoplanets may cause increased stellar flares and starspots on their host stars, in 2019 this claim was demonstrated to be false in the HD 189733 system. The failure to detect "star-planet interactions" in the well-studied HD 189733 system calls other related claims of the effect into question.[124]

In 2019 the strength of the surface magnetic fields of 4 hot Jupiters were estimated and ranged between 20 and 120 gauss compared to Jupiter's surface magnetic field of 4.3 gauss.[125][126]

Plate tectonics

In 2007, two independent teams of researchers came to opposing conclusions about the likelihood of plate tectonics on larger super-Earths[127][128] with one team saying that plate tectonics would be episodic or stagnant[129] and the other team saying that plate tectonics is very likely on super-Earths even if the planet is dry.[130]

If super-Earths have more than 80 times as much water as Earth then they become ocean planets with all land completely submerged. However, if there is less water than this limit, then the deep water cycle will move enough water between the oceans and mantle to allow continents to exist.[131][132]


Large surface temperature variations on 55 Cancri e have been attributed to possible volcanic activity releasing large clouds of dust which blanket the planet and block thermal emissions.[133][134]


The star 1SWASP J140747.93-394542.6 is orbited by an object that is circled by a ring system much larger than Saturn's rings. However, the mass of the object is not known; it could be a brown dwarf or low-mass star instead of a planet.[135][136]

The brightness of optical images of Fomalhaut b could be due to starlight reflecting off a circumplanetary ring system with a radius between 20 and 40 times that of Jupiter's radius, about the size of the orbits of the Galilean moons.[137]

The rings of the Solar System's gas giants are aligned with their planet's equator. However, for exoplanets that orbit close to their star, tidal forces from the star would lead to the outermost rings of a planet being aligned with the planet's orbital plane around the star. A planet's innermost rings would still be aligned with the planet's equator so that if the planet has a tilted rotational axis, then the different alignments between the inner and outer rings would create a warped ring system.[138]


In December 2013 a candidate exomoon of a rogue planet was announced.[139] On 3 October 2018, evidence suggesting a large exomoon orbiting Kepler-1625b was reported.[140]


Clear versus cloudy atmospheres on two exoplanets.[141]

Atmospheres have been detected around several exoplanets. The first to be observed was HD 209458 b in 2001.[142]

In May 2017, glints of light from Earth, seen as twinkling from an orbiting satellite a million miles away, were found to be reflected light from ice crystals in the atmosphere.[143][144] The technology used to determine this may be useful in studying the atmospheres of distant worlds, including those of exoplanets.

Comet-like tails

KIC 12557548 b is a small rocky planet, very close to its star, that is evaporating and leaving a trailing tail of cloud and dust like a comet.[145] The dust could be ash erupting from volcanos and escaping due to the small planet's low surface-gravity, or it could be from metals that are vaporized by the high temperatures of being so close to the star with the metal vapor then condensing into dust.[146]

In June 2015, scientists reported that the atmosphere of GJ 436 b was evaporating, resulting in a giant cloud around the planet and, due to radiation from the host star, a long trailing tail 14 million km (9 million mi) long.[147]

Insolation pattern

Tidally locked planets in a 1:1 spin-orbit resonance would have their star always shining directly overhead on one spot which would be hot with the opposite hemisphere receiving no light and being freezing cold. Such a planet could resemble an eyeball with the hotspot being the pupil.[148] Planets with an eccentric orbit could be locked in other resonances. 3:2 and 5:2 resonances would result in a double-eyeball pattern with hotspots in both eastern and western hemispheres.[149] Planets with both an eccentric orbit and a tilted axis of rotation would have more complicated insolation patterns.[150]


As more planets are discovered, the field of exoplanetology continues to grow into a deeper study of extrasolar worlds, and will ultimately tackle the prospect of life on planets beyond the Solar System.[81] At cosmic distances, life can only be detected if it is developed at a planetary scale and strongly modified the planetary environment, in such a way that the modifications cannot be explained by classical physico-chemical processes (out of equilibrium processes).[81] For example, molecular oxygen (O2) in the atmosphere of Earth is a result of photosynthesis by living plants and many kinds of microorganisms, so it can be used as an indication of life on exoplanets, although small amounts of oxygen could also be produced by non-biological means.[151] Furthermore, a potentially habitable planet must orbit a stable star at a distance within which planetary-mass objects with sufficient atmospheric pressure can support liquid water at their surfaces.[152][153]

See also


  1. 1.0 1.1 For the purpose of this 1 in 5 statistic, "Sun-like" means G-type star. Data for Sun-like stars was not available so this statistic is an extrapolation from data about K-type stars
  2. 2.0 2.1 For the purpose of this 1 in 5 statistic, Earth-sized means 1–2 Earth radii
  3. For the purpose of this 1 in 5 statistic, "habitable zone" means the region with 0.25 to 4 times Earth's stellar flux (corresponding to 0.5–2 AU for the Sun).
  4. About 1/4 of stars are GK Sun-like stars. The number of stars in the galaxy is not accurately known, but assuming 200 billion stars in total, the Milky Way would have about 50 billion Sun-like (GK) stars, of which about 1 in 5 (22%) or 11 billion would have Earth-sized planets in the habitable zone. Including red dwarfs would increase this to 40 billion.


  1. "Planet Population is Plentiful". ESO. 11 January 2012. 
  2. "The Extrasolar Planet Encyclopaedia — Catalog Listing". 
  3. "Exoplanet Transit Database: TrES-3b". Czech Astronomical Society. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Landau, Elizabeth (12 November 2017). "Overlooked Treasure: The First Evidence of Exoplanets". NASA. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Schneider, J.. "Interactive Extra-solar Planets Catalog". The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia. Retrieved 1 January 2020. 
  6. F. J. Ballesteros; A. Fernandez-Soto; V. J. Martinez (2019). "Title: Diving into Exoplanets: Are Water Seas the Most Common?". Astrobiology 19 (5): 642–654. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1720. PMID 30789285. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 Cassan, A.; Kubas, D.; Beaulieu, J. -P.; Dominik, M.; Horne, K.; Greenhill, J.; Wambsganss, J.; Menzies, J. et al. (11 January 2012). "One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations". Nature 481 (7380): 167–169. doi:10.1038/nature10684. PMID 22237108. Bibcode2012Natur.481..167C. 
  8. Sanders, R. (4 November 2013). "Astronomers answer key question: How common are habitable planets?". 
  9. Petigura, E. A.; Howard, A. W.; Marcy, G. W. (2013). "Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (48): 19273–19278. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319909110. PMID 24191033. Bibcode2013PNAS..11019273P. 
  10. Khan, Amina (4 November 2013). "Milky Way may host billions of Earth-size planets". Los Angeles Times.,0,2673237.story. 
  11. "HR 2562 b". Caltech. 
  12. Konopacky, Quinn M.; Rameau, Julien; Duchêne, Gaspard; Filippazzo, Joseph C.; Giorla Godfrey, Paige A.; Marois, Christian; Nielsen, Eric L. (20 September 2016). "Discovery of a Substellar Companion to the Nearby Debris Disk Host HR 2562". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 829 (1): 10. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/829/1/L4. Bibcode2016ApJ...829L...4K. 
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Bodenheimer, Peter; D'Angelo, Gennaro; Lissauer, Jack J.; Fortney, Jonathan J.; Saumon, Didier (2013). "Deuterium Burning in Massive Giant Planets and Low-mass Brown Dwarfs Formed by Core-nucleated Accretion". The Astrophysical Journal 770 (2): 120. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/120. Bibcode2013ApJ...770..120B. 
  14. Zachos, Elaine (5 February 2018). "More Than a Trillion Planets Could Exist Beyond Our Galaxy – A new study gives the first evidence that exoplanets exist beyond the Milky Way.". National Geographic Society. 
  15. Mandelbaum, Ryan F. (5 February 2018). "Scientists Find Evidence of Thousands of Planets in Distant Galaxy". Gizmodo. 
  16. Anglada-Escudé, Guillem; Amado, Pedro J.; Barnes, John et al. (2016). "A terrestrial planet candidate in a temperate orbit around Proxima Centauri". Nature 536 (7617): 437–440. doi:10.1038/nature19106. PMID 27558064. Bibcode2016Natur.536..437A. 
  17. Overbye, Dennis (6 January 2015). "As Ranks of Goldilocks Planets Grow, Astronomers Consider What's Next". The New York Times. 
  18. Beichman, C.; Gelino, Christopher R.; Kirkpatrick, J. Davy; Cushing, Michael C.; Dodson-Robinson, Sally; Marley, Mark S.; Morley, Caroline V.; Wright, E. L. (2014). "WISE Y Dwarfs As Probes of the Brown Dwarf-Exoplanet Connection". The Astrophysical Journal 783 (2): 68. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/68. Bibcode2014ApJ...783...68B. 
  19. "A Guide to Lonely Planets in the Galaxy" (in en). 2014-03-13. 
  20. Strigari, L. E.; Barnabè, M.; Marshall, P. J.; Blandford, R. D. (2012). "Nomads of the Galaxy". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 423 (2): 1856–1865. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21009.x. Bibcode2012MNRAS.423.1856S.  estimates 700 objects >10−6 solar masses (roughly the mass of Mars) per main-sequence star between 0.08 and 1 Solar mass, of which there are billions in the Milky Way.
  21. "IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes". 2006. 
  22. Brit, R. R. (2006). "Why Planets Will Never Be Defined". 
  23. "Working Group on Extrasolar Planets: Definition of a "Planet"". IAU position statement. 28 February 2003. 
  24. "Official Working Definition of an Exoplanet". IAU position statement. 
  25. Mordasini, C.; Alibert, Yann; Benz, Willy; Naef, Dominique (2008). "Giant Planet Formation by Core Accretion". Extreme Solar Systems 398: 235. Bibcode2008ASPC..398..235M. 
  26. Baraffe, I.; Chabrier, G.; Barman, T. (2008). "Structure and evolution of super-Earth to super-Jupiter exoplanets. I. Heavy element enrichment in the interior". Astronomy and Astrophysics 482 (1): 315–332. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079321. Bibcode2008A&A...482..315B. 
  27. Bouchy, François; Hébrard, Guillaume; Udry, Stéphane; Delfosse, Xavier; Boisse, Isabelle; Desort, Morgan; Bonfils, Xavier; Eggenberger, Anne et al. (2009). "The SOPHIE northern extrasolar planets. I. A companion close to the planet/brown-dwarf transition around HD16760". Astronomy and Astrophysics 505 (2): 853–858. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912427. Bibcode2009A&A...505..853B. 
  28. Kumar, Shiv S. (2003). "Nomenclature: Brown Dwarfs, Gas Giant Planets, and ?". Brown Dwarfs 211: 532. Bibcode2003IAUS..211..529B. 
  29. Brandt, T. D.Expression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (2014). "A Statistical Analysis of Seeds and Other High-Contrast Exoplanet Surveys: Massive Planets or Low-Mass Brown Dwarfs?". The Astrophysical Journal 794 (2): 159. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/159. Bibcode2014ApJ...794..159B. 
  30. Schlaufman, Kevin C. (2018-01-22). "Evidence of an Upper Bound on the Masses of Planets and its Implications for Giant Planet Formation". The Astrophysical Journal 853 (1): 37. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa961c. ISSN 1538-4357. Bibcode2018ApJ...853...37S. 
  31. Spiegel, D. S.; Burrows, Adam; Milsom, J. A. (2011). "The Deuterium-Burning Mass Limit for Brown Dwarfs and Giant Planets". The Astrophysical Journal 727 (1): 57. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/57. Bibcode2011ApJ...727...57S. 
  32. Schneider, J.; Dedieu, C.; Le Sidaner, P.; Savalle, R.; Zolotukhin, I. (2011). "Defining and cataloging exoplanets: The database". Astronomy & Astrophysics 532 (79): A79. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116713. Bibcode2011A&A...532A..79S. 
  33. Schneider, Jean (2016). "III.8 Exoplanets versus brown dwarfs: The CoRoT view and the future". Exoplanets versus brown dwarfs: the CoRoT view and the future. pp. 157. doi:10.1051/978-2-7598-1876-1.c038. ISBN 978-2-7598-1876-1. 
  34. Hatzes Heike Rauer, Artie P. (2015). "A Definition for Giant Planets Based on the Mass-Density Relationship". The Astrophysical Journal 810 (2): L25. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/810/2/L25. Bibcode2015ApJ...810L..25H. 
  35. Wright, J. T.; Fakhouri, O.; Marcy, G. W.; Han, E.; Feng, Y.; Johnson, John Asher; Howard, A. W.; Fischer, D. A. et al. (2010). "The Exoplanet Orbit Database". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 123 (902): 412–422. doi:10.1086/659427. Bibcode2011PASP..123..412W. 
  36. "Exoplanet Criteria for Inclusion in the Exoplanet Archive". 
  37. Basri, Gibor; Brown, Michael E. (2006). "Planetesimals To Brown Dwarfs: What is a Planet?". Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34: 193–216. doi:10.1146/ Bibcode2006AREPS..34..193B. 
  38. Liebert, James (2003). "Nomenclature: Brown Dwarfs, Gas Giant Planets, and ?". Brown Dwarfs 211: 533. Bibcode2003IAUS..211..529B. 
  39. "ESO's SPHERE Unveils its First Exoplanet". 
  40. "International Astronomical Union | IAU". 
  41. 41.0 41.1 Wolszczan, A.; Frail, D. A. (1992). "A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12". Nature 355 (6356): 145–147. doi:10.1038/355145a0. Bibcode1992Natur.355..145W. 
  42. "These May Be the First Planets Found Outside Our Galaxy". National Geographic. 5 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2018. 
  43. "5,000 Exoplanets! NASA Confirms a Cosmic Milestone". 
  44. Eli Maor (1987). "Chapter 24: The New Cosmology". To Infinity and Beyond: A Cultural History of the Infinite. Originally in De l'infinito universo et mondi [On the Infinite Universe and Worlds] by Giordano Bruno (1584).. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser. p. 198. ISBN 978-1-4612-5396-9. 
  45. Newton, Isaac; I. Bernard Cohen; Anne Whitman (1999). The Principia: A New Translation and Guide. University of California Press. p. 940. ISBN 978-0-520-08816-0. 
  46. Struve, Otto (1952). "Proposal for a project of high-precision stellar radial velocity work". The Observatory 72: 199–200. Bibcode1952Obs....72..199S. 
  47. Jacob, W. S. (1855). "On Certain Anomalies presented by the Binary Star 70 Ophiuchi". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 15 (9): 228–230. doi:10.1093/mnras/15.9.228. Bibcode1855MNRAS..15..228J. 
  48. See, T. J. J. (1896). "Researches on the orbit of 70 Ophiuchi, and on a periodic perturbation in the motion of the system arising from the action of an unseen body". The Astronomical Journal 16: 17–23. doi:10.1086/102368. Bibcode1896AJ.....16...17S. 
  49. Sherrill, T. J. (1999). "A Career of Controversy: The Anomaly of T. J. J. See". Journal for the History of Astronomy 30 (98): 25–50. doi:10.1177/002182869903000102. Bibcode1999JHA....30...25S. 
  50. van de Kamp, P. (1969). "Alternate dynamical analysis of Barnard's star". Astronomical Journal 74: 757–759. doi:10.1086/110852. Bibcode1969AJ.....74..757V. 
  51. Boss, Alan (2009). The Crowded Universe: The Search for Living Planets. Basic Books. pp. 31–32. ISBN 978-0-465-00936-7. 
  52. Bailes, M.; Lyne, A. G.; Shemar, S. L. (1991). "A planet orbiting the neutron star PSR1829–10". Nature 352 (6333): 311–313. doi:10.1038/352311a0. Bibcode1991Natur.352..311B. 
  53. Lyne, A. G.; Bailes, M. (1992). "No planet orbiting PS R1829–10". Nature 355 (6357): 213. doi:10.1038/355213b0. Bibcode1992Natur.355..213L. 
  54. Campbell, B.; Walker, G. A. H.; Yang, S. (1988). "A search for substellar companions to solar-type stars". The Astrophysical Journal 331: 902. doi:10.1086/166608. Bibcode1988ApJ...331..902C. 
  55. Lawton, A. T.; Wright, P. (1989). "A planetary system for Gamma Cephei?". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 42: 335–336. Bibcode1989JBIS...42..335L. 
  56. Walker, G. A. H; Bohlender, D. A.; Walker, A. R.; Irwin, A. W.; Yang, S. L. S.; Larson, A. (1992). "Gamma Cephei – Rotation or planetary companion?". Astrophysical Journal Letters 396 (2): L91–L94. doi:10.1086/186524. Bibcode1992ApJ...396L..91W. 
  57. Hatzes, A. P.; Cochran, William D.; Endl, Michael; McArthur, Barbara; Paulson, Diane B.; Walker, Gordon A. H.; Campbell, Bruce; Yang, Stephenson (2003). "A Planetary Companion to Gamma Cephei A". Astrophysical Journal 599 (2): 1383–1394. doi:10.1086/379281. Bibcode2003ApJ...599.1383H. 
  58. Holtz, Robert (22 April 1994). "Scientists Uncover Evidence of New Planets Orbiting Star". Los Angeles Times via The Tech Online. 
  59. "Oldest Known Planet Identified". HubbleSite. 
  60. Mayor, M.; Queloz, D. (1995). "A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star". Nature 378 (6555): 355–359. doi:10.1038/378355a0. Bibcode1995Natur.378..355M. 
  61. Gibney, Elizabeth (18 December 2013). "In search of sister earths". Nature 504 (7480): 357–65. doi:10.1038/504357a. PMID 24352276. Bibcode2013Natur.504..357.. 
  62. Lissauer, J. J. (1999). "Three planets for Upsilon Andromedae". Nature 398 (6729): 659. doi:10.1038/19409. Bibcode1999Natur.398..659L. 
  63. Doyle, L. R.Expression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (2011). "Kepler-16: A Transiting Circumbinary Planet". Science 333 (6049): 1602–6. doi:10.1126/science.1210923. PMID 21921192. Bibcode2011Sci...333.1602D. 
  64. 64.0 64.1 Johnson, Michele; Harrington, J.D. (26 February 2014). "NASA's Kepler Mission Announces a Planet Bonanza, 715 New Worlds". NASA. 
  65. Wall, Mike (26 February 2014). "Population of Known Alien Planets Nearly Doubles as NASA Discovers 715 New Worlds". 
  66. Jonathan Amos (26 February 2014). "Kepler telescope bags huge haul of planets". BBC News. 
  67. Johnson, Michelle; Chou, Felicia (23 July 2015). "NASA's Kepler Mission Discovers Bigger, Older Cousin to Earth". NASA. 
  68. 68.0 68.1 68.2 NASA. "Discovery alert! Oddball planet could surrender its secrets". Exoplanet Exploration: Planets Beyond our Solar System. 
  69. "[VIDEO TOI 700d : une planète de la taille de la Terre découverte dans une "zone habitable""] (in fr).,8645004.php. 
  70. "Exoplanet and Candidate Statistics". NASA Exoplanet Archive, California Institute of Technology. 
  71. Jerry Colen (4 November 2013). "Kepler". NASA. 
  72. Harrington, J. D.; Johnson, M. (4 November 2013). "NASA Kepler Results Usher in a New Era of Astronomy". 
  73. "NASA's Exoplanet Archive KOI table". NASA. 
  74. Lewin, Sarah (19 June 2017). "NASA's Kepler Space Telescope Finds Hundreds of New Exoplanets, Boosts Total to 4,034". NASA. 
  75. Overbye, Dennis (19 June 2017). "Earth-Size Planets Among Final Tally of NASA's Kepler Telescope". The New York Times. 
  76. Crane, Leah (23 September 2020). "Astronomers may have found the first planet in another galaxy". New Scientist. 
  77. Di Stafano, R.; et al. (18 September 2020). "M51-ULS-1b: The First Candidate for a Planet in an External Galaxy". arXiv:2009.08987 [astro-ph.HE].
  78. Gough, Evan (1 October 2020). "A Rogue Earth-Mass Planet Has Been Discovered Freely Floating in the Milky Way Without a Star". Universe Today. 
  79. Mroz, Przemek (29 September 2020). "A terrestrial-mass rogue planet candidate detected in the shortest-timescale microlensing event". The Astrophysical Journal 903 (1): L11. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abbfad. Bibcode2020ApJ...903L..11M. 
  80. "ALMA Discovers Trio of Infant Planets around Newborn Star – Novel technique to find youngest planets in our galaxy". 
  81. 81.0 81.1 81.2 Ollivier, Marc; Maurel, Marie-Christine (2014). "Planetary Environments and Origins of Life: How to reinvent the study of Origins of Life on the Earth and Life in the". BIO Web of Conferences 2 2: 00001. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20140200001. 
  82. Gbur, Gregory J. (2016-11-17) (in en). Singular Optics. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-315-35668-6. 
  83. Mamajek, Eric E.; Usuda, Tomonori; Tamura, Motohide; Ishii, Miki (2009). "Initial Conditions of Planet Formation: Lifetimes of Primordial Disks". AIP Conference Proceedings. 1158. 3. doi:10.1063/1.3215910. Bibcode2009AIPC.1158....3M.  Exoplanets and Disks: Their Formation and Diversity: Proceedings of the International Conference
  84. Rice, W. K. M.; Armitage, P. J. (2003). "On the Formation Timescale and Core Masses of Gas Giant Planets". The Astrophysical Journal 598 (1): L55–L58. doi:10.1086/380390. Bibcode2003ApJ...598L..55R. 
  85. Yin, Q.; Jacobsen, S. B.; Yamashita, K.; Blichert-Toft, J.; Télouk, P.; Albarède, F. (2002). "A short timescale for terrestrial planet formation from Hf–W chronometry of meteorites". Nature 418 (6901): 949–952. doi:10.1038/nature00995. PMID 12198540. Bibcode2002Natur.418..949Y. 
  86. D'Angelo, G.; Durisen, R. H.; Lissauer, J. J. (2011). "Giant Planet Formation". in S. Seager.. Exoplanets. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ. pp. 319–346. 
  87. D'Angelo, G.; Lissauer, J. J. (2018). "Formation of Giant Planets". in Deeg H., Belmonte J.. Handbook of Exoplanets. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature. pp. 2319–2343. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7_140. ISBN 978-3-319-55332-0. Bibcode2018haex.bookE.140D. 
  88. Calvet, Nuria; D'Alessio, Paola; Hartmann, Lee; Wilner, David; Walsh, Andrew; Sitko, Michael (2001). "Evidence for a developing gap in a 10 Myr old protoplanetary disk". The Astrophysical Journal 568 (2): 1008–1016. doi:10.1086/339061. Bibcode2002ApJ...568.1008C. 
  89. Fridlund, Malcolm; Gaidos, Eric; Barragán, Oscar; Persson, Carina; Gandolfi, Davide; Cabrera, Juan; Hirano, Teruyuki; Kuzuhara, Masayuki et al. (28 April 2017). "EPIC210894022b −A short period super-Earth transiting a metal poor, evolved old star". Astronomy & Astrophysics 604: A16. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730822. 
  90. 90.0 90.1 D'Angelo, G.; Bodenheimer, P. (2016). "In Situ and Ex Situ Formation Models of Kepler 11 Planets". The Astrophysical Journal 828 (1): id. 33 (32 pp.). doi:10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/33. Bibcode2016ApJ...828...33D. 
  91. D'Angelo, G.; Bodenheimer, P. (2013). "Three-Dimensional Radiation-Hydrodynamics Calculations of the Envelopes of Young Planets Embedded in Protoplanetary Disks". The Astrophysical Journal 778 (1): 77 (29 pp.). doi:10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/77. Bibcode2013ApJ...778...77D. 
  92. D'Angelo, G.; Weidenschilling, S. J.; Lissauer, J. J.; Bodenheimer, P. (2014). "Growth of Jupiter: Enhancement of core accretion by a voluminous low-mass envelope". Icarus 241: 298–312. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.06.029. Bibcode2014Icar..241..298D. 
  93. Lammer, H.; Stokl, A.; Erkaev, N. V.; Dorfi, E. A.; Odert, P.; Gudel, M.; Kulikov, Y. N.; Kislyakova, K. G. et al. (2014). "Origin and loss of nebula-captured hydrogen envelopes from 'sub'- to 'super-Earths' in the habitable zone of Sun-like stars". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (4): 3225–3238. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu085. Bibcode2014MNRAS.439.3225L. 
  94. Johnson, R. E. (2010). "Thermally-Diven Atmospheric Escape". The Astrophysical Journal 716 (2): 1573–1578. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1573. Bibcode2010ApJ...716.1573J. 
  95. Zendejas, J.; Segura, A.; Raga, A.C. (2010). "Atmospheric mass loss by stellar wind from planets around main sequence M stars". Icarus 210 (2): 539–544. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.013. Bibcode2010Icar..210..539Z. 
  96. Masuda, K. (2014). "Very Low Density Planets Around Kepler-51 Revealed with Transit Timing Variations and an Anomaly Similar to a Planet-Planet Eclipse Event". The Astrophysical Journal 783 (1): 53. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/53. Bibcode2014ApJ...783...53M. 
  97. "Artist's impression of exoplanet orbiting two stars". 
  98. Petigura, E. A.; Howard, A. W.; Marcy, G. W. (2013). "Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (48): 19273–19278. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319909110. PMID 24191033. Bibcode2013PNAS..11019273P. 
  99. Cumming, Andrew; Butler, R. Paul; Marcy, Geoffrey W.; Vogt, Steven S.; Wright, Jason T.; Fischer, Debra A. (2008). "The Keck Planet Search: Detectability and the Minimum Mass and Orbital Period Distribution of Extrasolar Planets". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 120 (867): 531–554. doi:10.1086/588487. Bibcode2008PASP..120..531C. 
  100. Bonfils, Xavier; Forveille, Thierry; Delfosse, Xavier; Udry, Stéphane; Mayor, Michel; Perrier, Christian; Bouchy, François; Pepe, Francesco et al. (2005). "The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets VI: A Neptune-mass planet around the nearby M dwarf Gl 581". Astronomy and Astrophysics 443 (3): L15–L18. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200500193. Bibcode2005A&A...443L..15B. 
  101. Wang, J.; Fischer, D. A. (2014). "Revealing a Universal Planet–Metallicity Correlation for Planets of Different Solar-Type Stars". The Astronomical Journal 149 (1): 14. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/149/1/14. Bibcode2015AJ....149...14W. 
  102. "Science work". 
  103. "STAR-DATA". 
  104. Garner, Rob (2016-10-31). "NASA Hubble Finds a True Blue Planet". 
  105. Evans, T. M.; Pont, F. D. R.; Sing, D. K.; Aigrain, S.; Barstow, J. K.; Désert, J. M.; Gibson, N.; Heng, K. et al. (2013). "The Deep Blue Color of HD189733b: Albedo Measurements with Hubble Space Telescope/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph at Visible Wavelengths". The Astrophysical Journal 772 (2): L16. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/772/2/L16. Bibcode2013ApJ...772L..16E. 
  106. Kuzuhara, M. et al. (2013). "Direct Imaging of a Cold Jovian Exoplanet in Orbit around the Sun-like Star GJ 504". The Astrophysical Journal 774 (11): 11. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/11. Bibcode2013ApJ...774...11K. 
  107. Carson; Thalmann; Janson; Kozakis; Bonnefoy; Biller; Schlieder; Currie et al. (15 November 2012). "Direct Imaging Discovery of a 'Super-Jupiter' Around the late B-Type Star Kappa And". The Astrophysical Journal 763 (2): L32. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/763/2/L32. Bibcode2013ApJ...763L..32C. 
  108. "Helium-Shrouded Planets May Be Common in Our Galaxy". SpaceDaily. 16 June 2015. 
  109. The Apparent Brightness and Size of Exoplanets and their Stars , Abel Mendez, updated 30 June 2012, 12:10 pm
  110. "Coal-Black Alien Planet Is Darkest Ever Seen". 11 August 2011. 
  111. Kipping, David M.; Spiegel, David S. (2011). "Detection of visible light from the darkest world". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 417 (1): L88–L92. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01127.x. Bibcode2011MNRAS.417L..88K. 
  112. Barclay, T.; Huber, D.; Rowe, J. F.; Fortney, J. J.; Morley, C. V.; Quintana, E. V.; Fabrycky, D. C.; Barentsen, G. et al. (2012). "Photometrically derived masses and radii of the planet and star in the TrES-2 system". The Astrophysical Journal 761 (1): 53. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/53. Bibcode2012ApJ...761...53B. 
  113. 113.0 113.1 113.2 Burrows, Adam (2014). "Scientific Return of Coronagraphic Exoplanet Imaging and Spectroscopy Using WFIRST". arXiv:1412.6097 [astro-ph.EP].
  114. "Unlocking the Secrets of an Alien World's Magnetic Field" (in en). 2014-11-20. 
  115. Kislyakova, K. G.; Holmstrom, M.; Lammer, H.; Odert, P.; Khodachenko, M. L. (2014). "Magnetic moment and plasma environment of HD 209458b as determined from Ly observations". Science 346 (6212): 981–4. doi:10.1126/science.1257829. PMID 25414310. Bibcode2014Sci...346..981K. 
  116. Nichols, J. D. (2011). "Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling at Jupiter-like exoplanets with internal plasma sources: Implications for detectability of auroral radio emissions". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 414 (3): 2125–2138. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18528.x. Bibcode2011MNRAS.414.2125N. 
  117. "Radio Telescopes Could Help Find Exoplanets" (in en-US). 2011-04-18. 
  118. "Radio Detection of Extrasolar Planets: Present and Future Prospects". NRL, NASA/GSFC, NRAO, Observatoìre de Paris. 
  119. Kean, Sam (2016). "Forbidden plants, forbidden chemistry". Distillations 2 (2): 5. Retrieved 22 March 2018. 
  120. "Super-Earths Get Magnetic 'Shield' from Liquid Metal" (in en). 2012-11-22. 
  121. Buzasi, D. (2013). "Stellar Magnetic Fields As a Heating Source for Extrasolar Giant Planets". The Astrophysical Journal 765 (2): L25. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L25. Bibcode2013ApJ...765L..25B. 
  122. Chang, Kenneth (16 August 2018). "Settling Arguments About Hydrogen With 168 Giant Lasers – Scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory said they were "converging on the truth" in an experiment to understand hydrogen in its liquid metallic state.". The New York Times. 
  123. Staff (16 August 2018). "Under pressure, hydrogen offers a reflection of giant planet interiors – Hydrogen is the most-abundant element in the universe and the simplest, but that simplicity is deceptive". Science Daily. Retrieved 18 August 2018. 
  124. Route, Matthew (10 February 2019). "The Rise of ROME. I. A Multiwavelength Analysis of the Star-Planet Interaction in the HD 189733 System". The Astrophysical Journal 872 (1): 79. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafc25. Bibcode2019ApJ...872...79R. 
  125. "Magnetic Fields of 'Hot Jupiter' Exoplanets Are Much Stronger Than We Thought" (in en). 2019-07-29. 
  126. Cauley, P. Wilson; Shkolnik, Evgenya L.; Llama, Joe; Lanza, Antonino F. (Dec 2019). "Magnetic field strengths of hot Jupiters from signals of star-planet interactions". Nature Astronomy 3 (12): 1128–1134. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0840-x. ISSN 2397-3366. Bibcode2019NatAs...3.1128C. 
  127. Valencia, Diana; O'Connell, Richard J. (2009). "Convection scaling and subduction on Earth and super-Earths". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 286 (3–4): 492–502. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.015. Bibcode2009E&PSL.286..492V. 
  128. Van Heck, H.J.; Tackley, P.J. (2011). "Plate tectonics on super-Earths: Equally or more likely than on Earth". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 310 (3–4): 252–261. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2011.07.029. Bibcode2011E&PSL.310..252V. 
  129. O'Neill, C.; Lenardic, A. (2007). "Geological consequences of super-sized Earths". Geophysical Research Letters 34 (19): L19204. doi:10.1029/2007GL030598. Bibcode2007GeoRL..3419204O. 
  130. Valencia, Diana; O'Connell, Richard J.; Sasselov, Dimitar D (November 2007). "Inevitability of Plate Tectonics on Super-Earths". Astrophysical Journal Letters 670 (1): L45–L48. doi:10.1086/524012. Bibcode2007ApJ...670L..45V. 
  131. "Super Earths Likely To Have Both Oceans and Continents - Astrobiology". 
  132. Cowan, N. B.; Abbot, D. S. (2014). "Water Cycling Between Ocean and Mantle: Super-Earths Need Not Be Waterworlds". The Astrophysical Journal 781 (1): 27. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/27. Bibcode2014ApJ...781...27C. 
  133. Michael D. Lemonick (6 May 2015). "Astronomers May Have Found Volcanoes 40 Light-Years From Earth". National Geographic. Retrieved 8 November 2015. 
  134. Demory, Brice-Olivier; Gillon, Michael; Madhusudhan, Nikku; Queloz, Didier (2015). "Variability in the super-Earth 55 Cnc e". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (2): 2018–2027. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2239. Bibcode2016MNRAS.455.2018D. 
  135. "Scientists Discover a Saturn-like Ring System Eclipsing a Sun-like Star". 
  136. Mamajek, E. E.; Quillen, A. C.; Pecaut, M. J.; Moolekamp, F.; Scott, E. L.; Kenworthy, M. A.; Cameron, A. C.; Parley, N. R. (2012). "Planetary Construction Zones in Occultation: Discovery of an Extrasolar Ring System Transiting a Young Sun-Like Star and Future Prospects for Detecting Eclipses by Circumsecondary and Circumplanetary Disks". The Astronomical Journal 143 (3): 72. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/3/72. Bibcode2012AJ....143...72M. 
  137. Kalas, P.; Graham, J. R.; Chiang, E.; Fitzgerald, M. P.; Clampin, M.; Kite, E. S.; Stapelfeldt, K.; Marois, C. et al. (2008). "Optical Images of an Exosolar Planet 25 Light-Years from Earth". Science 322 (5906): 1345–8. doi:10.1126/science.1166609. PMID 19008414. Bibcode2008Sci...322.1345K. 
  138. Schlichting, Hilke E.; Chang, Philip (2011). "Warm Saturns: On the Nature of Rings around Extrasolar Planets That Reside inside the Ice Line". The Astrophysical Journal 734 (2): 117. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/117. Bibcode2011ApJ...734..117S. 
  139. Bennett, D. P.Expression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (2014). "MOA-2011-BLG-262Lb: A sub-Earth-mass moon orbiting a gas giant or a high-velocity planetary system in the galactic bulge". The Astrophysical Journal 785 (2): 155. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/155. Bibcode2014ApJ...785..155B. 
  140. Teachey, Alex; Kipping, David M. (1 October 2018). "Evidence for a large exomoon orbiting Kepler-1625b" (in en). Science Advances 4 (10): eaav1784. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav1784. ISSN 2375-2548. PMID 30306135. Bibcode2018SciA....4.1784T. 
  141. "Cloudy versus clear atmospheres on two exoplanets". 
  142. Charbonneau, David (2002). "Detection of an Extrasolar Planet Atmosphere". The Astrophysical Journal 568 (1): 377–384. doi:10.1086/338770. Bibcode2002ApJ...568..377C. 
  143. St. Fleur, Nicholas (19 May 2017). "Spotting Mysterious Twinkles on Earth From a Million Miles Away". The New York Times. 
  144. Marshak, Alexander; Várnai, Tamás; Kostinski, Alexander (15 May 2017). "Terrestrial glint seen from deep space: oriented ice crystals detected from the Lagrangian point". Geophysical Research Letters 44 (10): 5197–5202. doi:10.1002/2017GL073248. Bibcode2017GeoRL..44.5197M. 
  145. University, Leiden. "Evaporating exoplanet stirs up dust" (in en). 
  146. "New-found exoplanet is evaporating away" (in en-US). 2012-05-18. 
  147. Bhanoo, Sindya N. (25 June 2015). "A Planet with a Tail Nine Million Miles Long". The New York Times. 
  148. Raymond, Sean (2015-02-20). "Forget "Earth-Like"—We'll First Find Aliens on Eyeball Planets". 
  149. Dobrovolskis, Anthony R. (2015). "Insolation patterns on eccentric exoplanets". Icarus 250: 395–399. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.12.017. Bibcode2015Icar..250..395D. 
  150. Dobrovolskis, Anthony R. (2013). "Insolation on exoplanets with eccentricity and obliquity". Icarus 226 (1): 760–776. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.06.026. Bibcode2013Icar..226..760D. 
  151. "Oxygen Is Not Definitive Evidence of Life on Extrasolar Planets". NAOJ (Astrobiology Web). 10 September 2015. 
  152. Kopparapu, Ravi Kumar (2013). "A revised estimate of the occurrence rate of terrestrial planets in the habitable zones around kepler m-dwarfs". The Astrophysical Journal Letters 767 (1): L8. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/767/1/L8. Bibcode2013ApJ...767L...8K. 
  153. Cruz, Maria; Coontz, Robert (2013). "Exoplanets - Introduction to Special Issue". Science 340 (6132): 565. doi:10.1126/science.340.6132.565. PMID 23641107. 

Further reading

  • Boss, Alan (2009). The Crowded Universe: The Search for Living Planets. Basic Books.  ISBN:978-0-465-00936-7 (Hardback); ISBN:978-0-465-02039-3 (Paperback).
  • Dorminey, Bruce (2001). Distant Wanderers. Springer-Verlag.  ISBN:978-0-387-95074-7 (Hardback); ISBN:978-1-4419-2872-6 (Paperback).
  • Jayawardhana, Ray (2011). Strange New Worlds: The Search for Alien Planets and Life beyond Our Solar System. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.  ISBN:978-0-691-14254-8 (Hardcover).
  • Perryman, Michael (2011). The Exoplanet Handbook. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-76559-6. 
  • Seager, Sara, ed (2011). Exoplanets. University of Arizona Press.  ISBN:978-0-8165-2945-2.
  • Villard, Ray; Cook, Lynette R. (2005). Infinite Worlds: An Illustrated Voyage to Planets Beyond Our Sun. University of California Press.  ISBN:978-0-520-23710-0.
  • Yaqoob, Tahir (2011). Exoplanets and Alien Solar Systems. New Earth Labs (Education and Outreach).  ISBN:978-0-9741689-2-0 (Paperback).
  • van Dishoeck, Ewine F.; Bergin, Edwin A.; Lis, Dariusz C.; Lunine, Jonathan I. (2014). "Water: From Clouds to Planets". Protostars and Planets VI. 835. doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch036. ISBN 978-0-8165-3124-0. Bibcode2014prpl.conf..835V. 

External links