# Physics:S-process

Short description: Nucleosynthesis pathway

The slow neutron-capture process, or s-process, is a series of reactions in nuclear astrophysics that occur in stars, particularly asymptotic giant branch stars. The s-process is responsible for the creation (nucleosynthesis) of approximately half the atomic nuclei heavier than iron.

In the s-process, a seed nucleus undergoes neutron capture to form an isotope with one higher atomic mass. If the new isotope is stable, a series of increases in mass can occur, but if it is unstable, then beta decay will occur, producing an element of the next higher atomic number. The process is slow (hence the name) in the sense that there is sufficient time for this radioactive decay to occur before another neutron is captured. A series of these reactions produces stable isotopes by moving along the valley of beta-decay stable isobars in the table of nuclides.

A range of elements and isotopes can be produced by the s-process, because of the intervention of alpha decay steps along the reaction chain. The relative abundances of elements and isotopes produced depends on the source of the neutrons and how their flux changes over time. Each branch of the s-process reaction chain eventually terminates at a cycle involving lead, bismuth, and polonium.

The s-process contrasts with the r-process, in which successive neutron captures are rapid: they happen more quickly than the beta decay can occur. The r-process dominates in environments with higher fluxes of free neutrons; it produces heavier elements and more neutron-rich isotopes than the s-process. Together the two processes account for most of the relative abundance of chemical elements heavier than iron.

## History

The s-process was seen to be needed from the relative abundances of isotopes of heavy elements and from a newly published table of abundances by Hans Suess and Harold Urey in 1956.[1] Among other things, these data showed abundance peaks for strontium, barium, and lead, which, according to quantum mechanics and the nuclear shell model, are particularly stable nuclei, much like the noble gases are chemically inert. This implied that some abundant nuclei must be created by slow neutron capture, and it was only a matter of determining how other nuclei could be accounted for by such a process. A table apportioning the heavy isotopes between s-process and r-process was published in the famous B2FH review paper in 1957.[2] There it was also argued that the s-process occurs in red giant stars. In a particularly illustrative case, the element technetium, whose longest half-life is 4.2 million years, had been discovered in s-, M-, and N-type stars in 1952[3][4] by Paul W. Merrill.[5][6] Since these stars were thought to be billions of years old, the presence of technetium in their outer atmospheres was taken as evidence of its recent creation there, probably unconnected with the nuclear fusion in the deep interior of the star that provides its power.

Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. The elements heavier than iron with origins in dying low-mass stars are typically those produced by the s-process, which is characterized by slow neutron diffusion and capture over long periods in such stars.

A calculable model for creating the heavy isotopes from iron seed nuclei in a time-dependent manner was not provided until 1961.[7] That work showed that the large overabundances of barium observed by astronomers in certain red-giant stars could be created from iron seed nuclei if the total neutron flux (number of neutrons per unit area) was appropriate. It also showed that no one single value for neutron flux could account for the observed s-process abundances, but that a wide range is required. The numbers of iron seed nuclei that were exposed to a given flux must decrease as the flux becomes stronger. This work also showed that the curve of the product of neutron-capture cross section times abundance is not a smoothly falling curve, as B2FH had sketched, but rather has a ledge-precipice structure. A series of papers[8][9][10][11][12][13] in the 1970s by Donald D. Clayton utilizing an exponentially declining neutron flux as a function of the number of iron seed exposed became the standard model of the s-process and remained so until the details of AGB-star nucleosynthesis became sufficiently advanced that they became a standard model for s-process element formation based on stellar structure models. Important series of measurements of neutron-capture cross sections were reported from Oak Ridge National Lab in 1965[14] and by Karlsruhe Nuclear Physics Center in 1982[15] and subsequently, these placed the s-process on the firm quantitative basis that it enjoys today.

## The s-process in stars

The s-process is believed to occur mostly in asymptotic giant branch stars, seeded by iron nuclei left by a supernova during a previous generation of stars. In contrast to the r-process which is believed to occur over time scales of seconds in explosive environments, the s-process is believed to occur over time scales of thousands of years, passing decades between neutron captures. The extent to which the s-process moves up the elements in the chart of isotopes to higher mass numbers is essentially determined by the degree to which the star in question is able to produce neutrons. The quantitative yield is also proportional to the amount of iron in the star's initial abundance distribution. Iron is the "starting material" (or seed) for this neutron capture-beta minus decay sequence of synthesizing new elements.

The main neutron source reactions are:

 136C + 42He → 168O + Neutron 2210Ne + 42He → 2512Mg + Neutron
The s-process acting in the range from Ag to Sb.

One distinguishes the main and the weak s-process component. The main component produces heavy elements beyond Sr and Y, and up to Pb in the lowest metallicity stars. The production sites of the main component are low-mass asymptotic giant branch stars.[16] The main component relies on the 13C neutron source above.[17] The weak component of the s-process, on the other hand, synthesizes s-process isotopes of elements from iron group seed nuclei to 58Fe on up to Sr and Y, and takes place at the end of helium- and carbon-burning in massive stars. It employs primarily the 22Ne neutron source. These stars will become supernovae at their demise and spew those s-process isotopes into interstellar gas.

The s-process is sometimes approximated over a small mass region using the so-called "local approximation", by which the ratio of abundances is inversely proportional to the ratio of neutron-capture cross-sections for nearby isotopes on the s-process path. This approximation is – as the name indicates – only valid locally, meaning for isotopes of nearby mass numbers, but it is invalid at magic numbers where the ledge-precipice structure dominates.

Chart representing the final part of the s-process. Red horizontal lines with a circle in their right ends represent neutron captures; blue arrows pointing up-left represent beta decays; green arrows pointing down-left represent alpha decays; cyan/light-green arrows pointing down-right represent electron captures.

Because of the relatively low neutron fluxes expected to occur during the s-process (on the order of 105 to 1011 neutrons per cm2 per second), this process does not have the ability to produce any of the heavy radioactive isotopes such as thorium or uranium. The cycle that terminates the s-process is:

209Bi captures a neutron, producing 210Bi, which decays to 210Po by β decay. 210Po in turn decays to 206Pb by α decay:

 20983Bi + Neutron → 21083Bi + Gamma 21083Bi → 21084Po + e− + Electron Antineutrino 21084Po → 20682Pb + 42He

206Pb then captures three neutrons, producing 209Pb, which decays to 209Bi by β decay, restarting the cycle:

 20682Pb + 3 Neutron → 20982Pb 20982Pb → 20983Bi + e− + Electron Antineutrino

The net result of this cycle therefore is that 4 neutrons are converted into one alpha particle, two electrons, two anti-electron neutrinos and gamma radiation:

 4 Neutron → 42He + 2 e− + 2 Electron Antineutrino + Gamma

The process thus terminates in bismuth, the heaviest "stable" element, and polonium, the first non-primordial element after bismuth. Bismuth is actually slightly radioactive, but with a half-life so long—a billion times the present age of the universe—that it is effectively stable over the lifetime of any existing star. Polonium-210, however, decays with a half-life of 138 d to stable lead-206.

## The s-process measured in stardust

Stardust is one component of cosmic dust. Stardust is individual solid grains that condensed during mass loss from various long-dead stars. Stardust existed throughout interstellar gas before the birth of the Solar System and was trapped in meteorites when they assembled from interstellar matter contained in the planetary accretion disk in early Solar System. Today they are found in meteorites, where they have been preserved. Meteoriticists habitually refer to them as presolar grains. The s-process enriched grains are mostly silicon carbide (SiC). The origin of these grains is demonstrated by laboratory measurements of extremely unusual isotopic abundance ratios within the grain. First experimental detection of s-process xenon isotopes was made in 1978,[18] confirming earlier predictions that s-process isotopes would be enriched, nearly pure, in stardust from red giant stars.[19] These discoveries launched new insight into astrophysics and into the origin of meteorites in the Solar System.[20] Silicon carbide (SiC) grains condense in the atmospheres of AGB stars and thus trap isotopic abundance ratios as they existed in that star. Because the AGB stars are the main site of the s-process in the galaxy, the heavy elements in the SiC grains contain almost pure s-process isotopes in elements heavier than iron. This fact has been demonstrated repeatedly by sputtering-ion mass spectrometer studies of these stardust presolar grains.[20] Several surprising results have shown that within them the ratio of s-process and r-process abundances is somewhat different from that which was previously assumed. It has also been shown with trapped isotopes of krypton and xenon that the s-process abundances in the AGB-star atmospheres changed with time or from star to star, presumably with the strength of neutron flux in that star or perhaps the temperature. This is a frontier of s-process studies in the 2000s.

## References

1. Suess, H. E.; Urey, H. C. (1956). "Abundances of the Elements". Reviews of Modern Physics 28 (1): 53–74. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.28.53. Bibcode1956RvMP...28...53S.
2. Burbidge, E. M.; Burbidge, G. R.; Fowler, W. A.; Hoyle, F. (1957). "Synthesis of the Elements in Stars". Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (4): 547–650. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547. Bibcode1957RvMP...29..547B.
3. Hammond, C. R. (2004). "The Elements". Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (81st ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8493-0485-9.
4. Moore, C. E. (1951). "Technetium in the Sun". Science 114 (2951): 59–61. doi:10.1126/science.114.2951.59. PMID 17782983. Bibcode1951Sci...114...59M.
5. Merrill, P. W. (1952). "Technetium in the stars". Science 115 (2992): 484.
6. George Sivulka (8 March 2017). "An Introduction to the Evidence for Stellar Nucleosynthesis". Stanford University.
7. Clayton, D. D.; Fowler, W. A.; Hull, T. E.; Zimmerman, B. A. (1961). "Neutron capture chains in heavy element synthesis". Annals of Physics 12 (3): 331–408. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(61)90067-7. Bibcode1961AnPhy..12..331C.
8. Clayton, D. D.; Rassbach, M. E. (1967). "Termination of the s-process". The Astrophysical Journal 148: 69. doi:10.1086/149128. Bibcode1967ApJ...148...69C.
9. Clayton, D. D. (1968). "Distribution of neutron-source strengths for the s-process". in Arnett, W. D.; Hansen, C. J.; Truran, J. W. et al.. Nucleosynthesis. Gordon and Breach. pp. 225–240.
10. Peters, J. G.; Fowler, W. A.; Clayton, D. D. (1972). "Weak s-process Irradiations". The Astrophysical Journal 173: 637. doi:10.1086/151450. Bibcode1972ApJ...173..637P.
11. Clayton, D. D.; Newman, M. J. (1974). "s-process Studies: Exact Solution to a Chain Having Two Distinct Cross-Section Values". The Astrophysical Journal 192: 501. doi:10.1086/153082. Bibcode1974ApJ...192..501C.
12. Clayton, D. D.; Ward, R. A. (1974). "s-process Studies: Exact Evaluation of an Exponential Distribution of Exposures". The Astrophysical Journal 193: 397. doi:10.1086/153175. Bibcode1974ApJ...193..397C.
13. Ward, R. A.; Newman, M. J.; Clayton, D. D. (1976). "s-process Studies: Branching and the Time Scale". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 31: 33. doi:10.1086/190373. Bibcode1976ApJS...31...33W.
14. Macklin, R. L.; Gibbons, J. H. (1965). "Neutron Capture Data at Stellar Temperatures". Reviews of Modern Physics 37 (1): 166–176. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.37.166. Bibcode1965RvMP...37..166M.
15. Kaeppeler, F.; Beer, H.; Wisshak, K.; Clayton, D. D.; Macklin, R. L.; Ward, R. A. (1982). "s-process studies in the light of new experimental cross sections". The Astrophysical Journal 257: 821–846. doi:10.1086/160033. Bibcode1982ApJ...257..821K.
16. Boothroyd, A. I. (2006). "Heavy elements in stars". Science 314 (5806): 1690–1691. doi:10.1126/science.1136842. PMID 17170281.
17. Busso, M.; Gallino, R.; Wasserburg, G. J. (1999). "Nucleosynthesis in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars: Relevance for Galactic Enrichment and Solar System Formation". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 37 (1): 239–309. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239. Bibcode1999ARA&A..37..239B.
18. Srinivasan, B.; Anders, E. (1978). "Noble Gases in the Murchison Meteorite: Possible Relics of s-process Nucleosynthesis". Science 201 (4350): 51–56. doi:10.1126/science.201.4350.51. PMID 17777755. Bibcode1978Sci...201...51S.
19. Clayton, D. D.; Ward, R. A. (1978). "s-process studies: Xenon and krypton isotopic abundances". The Astrophysical Journal 224: 1000. doi:10.1086/156449. Bibcode1978ApJ...224.1000C.
20. Clayton, D. D.; Nittler, L. R. (2004). "Astrophysics with Presolar Stardust". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 42 (1): 39–78. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134022. Bibcode2004ARA&A..42...39C.