Chemistry:RTI-177

From HandWiki
(Redirected from Chemistry:RTI-386)
Short description: Chemical compound
RTI-177
Identifiers
CAS Number
PubChem CID
ChemSpider
ChEMBL
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC23H23ClN2O
Molar mass378.90 g·mol−1
3D model (JSmol)

RTI(-4229)-177 (2β-(3-phenylisoxazol-5-yl)-3β-(4-chlorophenyl)tropane, β-CPPIT) is a synthetic stimulant drug from the phenyltropane family, which acts as a DRI with micromolar affinity for the SERT.[1] RTI-177 has an unusually long duration of action of 20 hours or more, substantially longer than the related compound RTI-336 from which it differs in molecular structure only by the absence of a p-methyl group.[2]

"the nonselective monoamine transporter inhibitor RTI-126 and the DAT-selective inhibitors RTI-150 and RTI-336 both had a faster rate of onset (30 min) and a short duration of action (4h). In contrast, the nonselective monoamine transporter inhibitor RTI-112 had a slower rate of onset (30–60 min) and a longer duration of action (10h). The DAT-selective inhibitors RTI-171 and RTI-177 also had slower rates of onset (30–120 min), but RTI-171 had a short duration of action (2.5 h) while RTI-177 had a very long duration of action (20 h)."[3]

Update

Lower reinforcing strength of the phenyltropane cocaine analogs RTI-336 and RTI-177 compared to cocaine in nonhuman primates.

Comparison of six MAT inhibitors

RTI X R [3H]CFT [3H]Nisoxetine [3H]Paroxetine
Coc — — 89.1 3298 (1986) 1045 (45)
177 Cl phenyl 1.28 504 (304) 2420 (220)
176 Me phenyl 1.58 398 (239) 5110 (465)
354 Me ethyl 1.62 299 (180) 6400 (582)
336 Cl p-cresyl 4.09 1714 (1033) 5741 (522)
386 Me p-anisoyl 3.93 756 (450) 4027 (380)

In the Lindsey paper, RTI-177 was wrongly considered to be a dual inhibitor of the NET, although this was later found out to be incorrect.[citation needed]

"In acute toxicity studies in male rats, 3β-(4-chlorophenyl)-2β-[3-(4’-methylphenyl)isoxazol-5-yl]tropane (RTI-336) possessed an LD50 of 180 mg/kg after oral administration, compared with 49 mg/kg for RTI-177 (unpublished results, Howell 2005; Table 9). These results suggested that RTI-336 was a better candidate than RTI-177 for further preclinical development."[2]

Also the potency of the heterocyclic compounds is not as great as would be predicted based on in vitro test results.

References